Spectacular video of Su-57 fighter flights appeared on the Web

A video of the flights of Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57 appeared on the Web in anticipation of the start of the MAKS-2019 international air show, which will be held in Zhukovsky from August 27 to September 1 this year. In the video frames, fighters perform various aerobatics.

An almost 12-minute video, entirely devoted to the airborne operation of Russian fifth-generation Su-57 fighters, shows various aircraft maneuvers in the air. Three of the newest fighters perform various air exercises in the air, including the "Cobra Pugachev", which not all types of NATO aircraft can perform, but only fifth-generation aircraft, according to open information, only the American F-22.

The Su-57 is a fifth-generation Russian multirole fighter designed using stealth technologies at Sukhoi Design Bureau. The fighter is designed to destroy air, ground and surface targets using air defense systems, long-range reconnaissance, as well as to destroy the control system aviation the enemy. It can fight alone and within the framework of the concept of a “single field”. The onboard control system accompanies up to 60 targets, while firing at 16 of them.

Comments

[PalBor]

Hmm, I always envied pilots who could do that. I even barely endured carousels in TsPKO. We are waiting for new engines.

[Egorovich]

The beauty!!! Well done !!! Nothing else comes to mind from such magnificence. Bravo!!!

[figwam]

Here is another beautiful photo

[Sky strike fighter]

In the photo it seems that they are floating in the water element. Like torpedoes after launch.

[Evil543]

Today, four 57 and a couple 30 flew, it is a pity that 27 only in Zhukovsky at MAKS will be, and not in the vicinity

[Pedrodepackes]

Handsome men, what do you say. If only without problems, like the F-22. Interestingly, and then the engines were modified by their relatives?

[AshiSolo]

After such videos, I always sit thoughtfully. How big is the man that he was able to create such perfect machines ... Yes, we are still insanely far from nature, with its perfection, but that's what perfection is. And here - here it is, only with the hands of man. Symbiosis of man, computer, metal and flame. Yes, so elegant and virtuoso. Each time aerobatics fascinates with its unearthly grace. Yet heaven is an element. And for pilots and their cars - it is natural and only possible. Handsomely.

[den3080]

Recently I saw a plot on TV about computer design of aircraft with the further manufacture of aircraft parts on 3D printers.
how elegant the details are compared to those made by conventional methods. Closer and closer to the constructions that nature provides. And this is being done in Russia.
Already goosebumps.
And now a similar feeling has arisen when watching this video.
Well done!

[Errr]

Quote: AshiSolo

Symbiosis of man, computer, metal and flame

and composites.) Su-57 is a "supercomposite"!

Quote: AshiSolo

Yet heaven is an element. And for pilots and their cars - it is natural and only possible.

Yes, you are a lyric poet, my friend ...))) Therefore, here is a little lyric poetry for you.)

[glk63]

If you remove the song - in general it will be wonderful.

[Errr]

Quote: glk63

If you remove the song - in general it will be wonderful.

It's a matter of taste.) But here it is also that Nikolai Anisimov is unofficially called "the voice of Russia's aerobatic teams." In addition to composing and performing "songs") about pilots and airplanes, he often voices at aerospace salons and air shows in different countries the work of "Russian Knights", "Swifts", "Rus" (fly on L-39) and "Berkuts". Personally, I sympathize with this person, who wholeheartedly loves the sky and aviation, because the doctors "hacked" him when he tried to enter CHVVAUL. Eyesight disappointed.)

[glk63]

Sorry if offended. Indeed - a matter of taste.

[Errr]

I did not even think to be offended.))) The world is interesting for its diversity.)

[Reading]

Man, this is a parasite that destroys everything around. And to admire the type of military equipment, a person can be very far from nature.

[rocket757]

Spectacle, I'm almost glad!
But I will be completely happy when our ALL AVIOPROM, although it will start "flying"!

[rocket757]

Cool.
Probably I want to just be glad that there IS and not think about what almost there .....

[bmv04636]

Now we have to combine that this is all complete bullshit

[navy33]

Well done !!! Beautifully piloted, already breathtaking.

[Dietmar]

I wish our one such bird in the Patriotic War, I’m silent about the link ... Goering could be hung immediately ...

[Kusja]

Mdaa, today I looked through brochures of almost a hundred years ago, dedicated to the domestic aviation industry. Airships, the first red pilots, and even a decade of the military aviation academy of Zhukovsky, Newport ... That would be good for those people to look at such a current miracle with one eye ..

[Sky strike fighter]

A complete delight !!!! The laws of physics do not seem to apply to it. What will happen when they install Item 30? No, it’s interesting to have a Su-57 with two Items 30 and cut the fast and the furious, how many it will accelerate if the cruising is promised about 2000 km / h?

[hydrox]

Yes, perhaps it will be able to evade missiles on its own, and anti-aircraft shells will be able to overtake in flight if it itself has a speed of more than 3M

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: hydrox

Yes, perhaps it will be able to evade missiles on its own, and anti-aircraft shells will be able to overtake in flight if it itself has a speed of more than 3M

Now there are such missiles that you can’t get away from them on any 5th generation fighter because of speeds from 5 Mach to 12 Mach and the guidance systems are high-quality, they will capture the target even at a great distance. R-37M, S-400, Aegis.

[hydrox]

You would not be spreading yourself in front of the amersky SM-kami :: only the SM-1 and SM-2 speeds are known from the press, both missiles have M <2. And to shoot down imitators - there is no need for high speeds.
But to consider the use of Russian missiles R-37M and all missiles of the S-400 complex with a maximum speed of 2500 km / h on our aircraft - is this just your frivolity or "mattress" propaganda, for which you can cut something down?

[hydrox]

By the way, the speed of the "Arrow" product is 5> M <6

[Tusv]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

.What will happen when they install Product 30?

Judging by the low stall speed and the digital camouflage. A cloud flies, it doesn't even threaten with rain. "Chick and you are in heaven" - as Humpbacked used to say. And finally, on the dvigun of the first stage, an automatic avoidance of a missile attack is provided. That is, the Pugachev cobra is launched without the participation of the pilot, what does this mean? No matter how praise the F-35, F-22, J-31, the chances in aerial combat are not great. Well, he fired rockets into milk and was left unarmed. By the way, the technology has been tested on the Su-35

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Tusv

And finally, on dvigun already the first stage provides automatic avoidance of a missile attack

where have you read such nonsense? Link please?

Quote: Tusv

That is, the Pugachev cobra is launched without the participation of the pilot, what does this mean? As the F-35, F-22, J-31 did not praise, the chances of aerial combat are not great. Well, he fired rockets into milk and remained unarmed.

Cobra is a beautiful and complex maneuver, but more for an air show. I’ll explain that there weren’t any unnecessary questions: when attacking with missiles from the TGSN (IK-GOS) the cobra is useless from the word completely, on the contrary, it’s even harmful - because the head of the rocket caught on the heat of the engines, and you also kindly stopped the plane so that the rocket is lighter than it it was a hit. It is also of little value when attacking with a missile with a radar homing system - the aircraft does not have kinetic energy, it does not have the ability to perform an energetic maneuver to disrupt the capture of the GOS missile. Missile defense maneuvers are not built like that.

[Tusv]

So it was shown on TV

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Tusv

So it was shown on TV

they show a lot of things on TV. As not very smart propaganda.
A cobra as a missile defense is of little value.
As a maneuver of conducting air combat with a gun - it is possible, but you still need to live up to it.
If you watch how the cobra is performed -

at a speed of about 500 km / h, the pilot completely takes the handle "towards himself", and upon reaching a pitch angle of 120 ° he gives "away" to a position close to neutral. Having reached the operational angles of attack, the pilot again takes the handle "on himself" again, thus preventing the escape to negative angles of attack.
The time spent at supercritical angles of attack should be minimal, otherwise lateral movement and stall will begin. Therefore, the rotation in the longitudinal plane must be energetic, with large angular velocities (about 65 ° / s). The maneuver takes 5-6 s and stays at attack angles greater than critical, 2.5-3.5 s. In this case, pitch angles of 70-120 ° are achieved, attack angles of 80-95 °, the speed of input into the figure is ~ 500 km / h, and at the output - 200-230 km / h.

it becomes clear that the aircraft, after performing the maneuver, is an excellent target. Nobody canceled the Pokryshkin formula "height - speed - maneuver - fire", and with the advent of missiles (especially highly maneuverable medium-range missiles) the maneuverable characteristics of the aircraft itself fade into the background - the missile is still faster and more maneuverable, it is necessary to disrupt guidance not only and not so much maneuver, how many means of electronic warfare

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

they show a lot of things on TV. As not very smart propaganda.

The Israeli Adirs have such a system, but Ours is a fantasy? However.

it becomes clear that he himself, after completing the maneuver, is an excellent target.

And it happens. Half-barrel and Fritz in sight. The same Pokryshkin noticed this. The maneuver is similar. Sharp braking by aerobatics and exit from the trajectory. Cobra, bell do the same. And no fiction

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Tusv

There is such a system on the Israeli Adirs

airplanes have a missile attack warning system, which, in turn, can automatically use electronic warfare equipment to disrupt the guidance of an attacking missile. I didn’t hear that the BIUS itself was carrying out some missile defense maneuvers. Automation of the aircraft to this day itself can only pull it out of a tailspin or lead to the horizon.
Link will be? It’s easier to figure out what was meant.

Quote: Tusv

And it happens. Half-barrel and Fritz in sight.

Firstly, these are all maneuvers of close air combat, to which one still needs to survive. Now a different era, the battle begins at a medium distance, with the help of missiles. Further - see above.

In addition, a half-barrel, a slanting loop - do not lead to a critical loss of speed. Cobra - leads, the plane almost loses translational speed. After exiting the maneuver, he also needs time to increase speed in order for the control surfaces to work normally. Loss of speed is always a bad thing, an almost certain chance of the device's death.
The maneuver is beautiful, but not combat.

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

Firstly, these are all maneuvers of close air combat, to which one still needs to survive. Now a different era, the battle begins at a medium distance, with the help of missiles. Further - see above.

Therefore, Cobra, and not a half-barrel. Here you need to know an important nuance. The infrared trace is shifting, because the rocket is very likely to miss. The adversary doesn’t have rockets like Verba, but you won’t get cannons. They said they’ll be far away. And about Adira - The professor was broadcasting on this site

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Tusv

The infrared trail is shifting, because the rocket is very likely to miss

won't miss. No trace is moving anywhere, the engines continue to work, and at maximum. Performing cobra - you only make it easier for the rocket.

The cobra was never seen as an element of air combat. Why did you come up with it, you ask? So the logical answer is to demonstrate the super-maneuverable capabilities of the machine. Another thing is whether someone needs it, that super-maneuverability? But it looks cool at an air show, right? Combat techniques are not so spectacular, but much more effective.

Even during World War II, a relatively small number of victories were won as a result of maneuvering at the maximum capabilities of the aircraft. And much more on the principle "saw the enemy first - tactically competently built an attack - shot down". So now - "I saw the first - the first shot - I won"

Just think, what radars are going to trick today by "stopping" the plane in the sky? And how many seconds then will it take to accelerate the aircraft to normal speed, at which it will again be able to maneuver in a controlled manner to continue the battle? How many times will it get knocked down while "hovering"?

However, do not believe my words - you can talk with aviation specialists. They will tell you about the same.

Quote: Tusv

And about Adira - the Professor was broadcasting

Professor - he is such a professor ..)

[Tusv]

I'm better in the picture

Well, the UVT nozzle can tear down, and it is unlikely to prevent a return attack

[Awaz]

Once upon a time, in an Internet video was popular from an American dumb movie about how missiles chase an airplane, performing complex maneuvers. However, in reality, missiles have a rather sluggish ability to maneuver. Moreover, in difficult conditions, such as combat and counter-electronic warfare, for example, the advertised characteristics are sharply leveled and FIG knows how it turns out in a real battle. If I were you, I wouldn’t believe unfoundedly with clips from an American movie about rocket capabilities

[Grigory_45]

Quote: AwaZ

on the internet, the video was popular from an American dumb movie about how rockets chase an airplane, performing complex maneuvers

Do not watch American films))
The missile does not go after the plane, but to a certain anticipated point, which its computer calculates, thereby minimizing its maneuvering losses. But if necessary, it is capable of turning almost on the spot, with such angles of attack that a manned aircraft is not capable of.

Quote: AwaZ

If I were you, I wouldn’t believe unfoundedly with clips from an American movie about rocket capabilities

I believe in the capabilities of domestic missiles and missiles in general. Especially when she is on the active site. Children’s babble sounds like

Quote: AwaZ

missiles have a sluggish enough room for maneuver

It depends on what kind of rocket. Ranged battle - for the most part, yes, but they are imprisoned for the destruction of poorly maneuverable targets such as bombers, transporters, AWACS. Short- and medium-range missiles possess excellent speed and maneuverability characteristics that far exceed the capabilities of both the aircraft itself and the (even more so) pilot. Available overload up to + 40g, speed under 5M - not a single one of their aircraft ever dreamed of. Not to mention the GOS with a large field of view, allowing the launch of a rocket from a position when the aircraft is not aimed at the enemy’s aircraft.

[Awaz]

and you do not contradict yourself? if the rocket flies to some calculated point of the expected meeting with the target and when the target understands that the rocket is approaching it, I hope it can change course or conduct an anti-ballistic maneuver, which should make the rocket also carry out flight corrections. A missile traveling at a speed two times three times the speed of an airplane can hardly maneuver like an airplane. And if she misses, then the second time she definitely won’t return))) Or do you not believe in it, that is, believe that will return.? And the launch is not in the direction of the target, because it happens that the rocket has not yet been dispersed.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: AwaZ

if the rocket flies to some calculated point of the intended meeting with the target and when the target understands that the rocket is approaching it, I hope it can change course or conduct a missile defense maneuver, which should make the rocket also carry out flight corrections

absolutely right)

Quote: AwaZ

A missile rushing at a speed two times three times the speed of an airplane can hardly maneuver like an airplane

like an airplane, no. Better than an airplane) A missile has a larger available overload and can make maneuvers at angles of attack not accessible to the airplane

Quote: AwaZ

And if she misses, then the second time then she definitely will not return)

if the GOS has lost its target, then yes. Nobody even says that the rocket will chase the plane as "tied on a string." A miss is as good as a mile.

Quote: AwaZ

on the internet, the video was popular from an American dumb movie

yeah, I remembered - "Behind Enemy Lines" was called, where missiles from Strela-10 chased the Super Hornet almost all over Serbia. Then, too, he neighing at the fantasy of the directors)

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

The cobra was never seen as an element of air combat. Why did you come up with it, you ask? So the logical answer is to demonstrate the super-maneuverable capabilities of the machine. Another thing is whether someone needs it, that super-maneuverability? But it looks cool at an air show, right? Combat techniques are not so spectacular, but much more effective.

The picture showed that the Cobra can be effective, and over-maneuverability. Even the Su-27 proved how easily they go into the tail of the f-15. Without UVT

Professor - he is such a professor ..)

Technology 36 years of the last century. The conclusion of the Laptezhnik (Pieces or U 87. How anyone likes the nickname) from the peak. So nothing supernatural. Why does it seem to you that the Cobra, Bell automatic machine gun is so difficult to get on?
And I repeat. The bourgeois have missiles like Verba with an optical seeker. So the maneuver could well be. And about the infrared trace showed already in the figure. The missile misses. Maximum knock down nozzle

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Tusv

The picture showed that Cobra might be effective

no, not shown. The picture shows what it is. Not a word about efficiency. But I made many arguments why it cannot be effective.

Quote: Tusv

The conclusion of the Laptezhnik (Pieces or U 87. How anyone likes the nickname) from the peak. So nothing supernatural

what I wrote above is automatic reduction to the horizon (if the pilot has lost spatial orientation) or withdrawal from a corkscrew is used on combat aircraft. But the missile defense maneuver is more complicated, its construction depends on each specific situation. Purely in terms of a template, it doesn’t work here, many factors influence - rocket type, range, speed, approach path, available altitude, presence of electronic warfare equipment, etc., etc. (and not just - the plane is at its peak, the height is less than that - yeah , then it's time to act on the steering wheels and bring the car to the horizon).

You better look for links. is there even such a system on at least one airplane than to write speculation.

Quote: Tusv

Maximum knock down nozzle

cool))) And the plane will be able to continue flying and perform a combat mission? Are you aware that the vast majority of missiles have a non-contact fuse?

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

But I made many arguments why it cannot be effective.

He circled in a red circle where the B-V rocket hits. The B-B missile is missed. And yes, the Jews are stupid go vertical and get away with it. A rocket can also give a circle. She is faster.
I repeat. The cobra is moving away from a missile attack, the radar is losing sight of, the infrared track is deceiving. And this is not a miracle

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

Are you aware that the vast majority of missiles have a non-contact fuse?

As a Guard corporal, three times with the Red Banner, the orders of Suvorov and Kutuzov, of course I know. Are you aware that not all ground divisions are hit by Our "control targets"? But there are some fucking targeting officers. We have, for example, a letekha - a sniper - he hit all targets with a lobshnik, with special snobbery

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

Just think, what radars are going to trick today by "stopping" the plane in the sky? And how many seconds then will it take to accelerate the aircraft to normal speed, at which it will again be able to maneuver in a controlled manner to continue the battle? How many times will it get knocked down while "hovering"?

Speaking of radars. Many radars do not see dangling objects.
And finally, are we talking about air-to-air rockets or ground-to-air rockets?
Of course you won’t get away from the earthly ones, there at 200 meters a striking element scatters. And the ball guidance officer will effortlessly point at the Target. There are no aerobatics to help, but from VV

[Tusv]

Quote: Gregory_45

Even during World War II, a relatively small number of victories were won as a result of maneuvering at the maximum capabilities of the aircraft. And much more on the principle of "saw the enemy first

Most victories in the Second World War are won from the Sun, Steep peak. Affected area above the roof. I don’t want to shoot.
And the first to see and defeat is far from a fact. You are definitely not a PUSHNIK

[Sky strike fighter]

And it happens. Half-barrel and Fritz in sight. The same Pokryshkin noticed this. The maneuver is similar. Sharp braking by aerobatics and exit from the trajectory. Cobra, bell do the same. And no fiction

About how it happens in real combat. Features of the battle at medium distances.

combat at medium distances begins with a competition of technique: whose radar will "see" further, whose "friend or foe" system will recognize earlier. The disadvantages of electronics are difficult to compensate for with destructive power, since without information (information about the location and characteristics of the target), long-range weapons cannot be aimed. Let's look at the composition of the ammunition load of a modern fighter-interceptor on alert: short-range and medium-range missiles are equally divided. This demonstrates the readiness to conduct both close and long-range combat in the arising typical situation.

The realization of the advantages of the new weapon in the practice of real combat has encountered serious obstacles. The results of the Lebanese conflict in the Middle East, where the era of all-aspect combat opened, showed that of the total number of attacks carried out, only one third fell on "frontal" attacks. Two-thirds were occupied by traditional close maneuver battles using missiles with IR seeker and guns. Finding out the reasons for this pointed to the enemy, who did not want to expose himself to attacks from distant lines. In addition, the shortcomings of the weapon itself were revealed.

Aiming launch was carried out only after the target was locked for automatic tracking and its flight was tracked for a rather long (by the standards of battle) time. The evasive maneuver (to get out of "detection" or "capture"), undertaken by the target, did not allow starting an approach at a distance of effective fire. Also, not a single launch was made in the view of the lower hemisphere, the interfering influence of the "earth" turned out to be much greater. The "friend or foe" system understood the identity of the target only with a single interception. The complication of the air situation, the intersection of the flight paths of "friends" and "foes" put the system at a standstill.

http://www.vko.ru/biblioteka/opyt-ispolzovaniya-rossiyskih-istrebiteley-v-lokalnyh-voynah

[New Year day]

The day before yesterday I looked at the roof. the beauty

[seregatara1969]

I saw the other day two of a pair of merry-go-round fighters spinning in the sky. trying to catch each other in sight. admired endlessly. like birds were spinning

[Valery Valery]

Miracle plane !!

[let_nab]

Elegant, damn it ...

[Ross xnumx]

As the saying goes:
Meet on clothes, and escorted to the mind!

When they first meet a person, people evaluate his “form”, how he looks, how he says. In the process of communication, people begin to peer into the "content" of this person - as he thinks, what he says. Evaluated by his mind, intellect, wisdom

This is not the first time that flights have evoked certain feelings - pride in our designers and pilots, admiration for the elegance of forms.
I would like to wait until the moment when it will be possible to discuss its use in any conflict or operation - this is a combat aircraft.

[Tusv]

Quote: ROSS 42

feelings - pride in our designers and pilots, admiration for the elegance of forms.

That is yes. Accustomed to deadly beauty. All new aerobatics from our aircraft industry. Here the bourgeoisie quietly envy. I also liked how this digital color works. Now flickers, then Drying turns into a cloud. It may happen that the enemy pilot the last thing he did not see would be the Su-57. With dvigunom the second stage should work. An all-round engine with UVT, less sound, less heat make the Su-57 generation 5 ++ automatically. Pratt und Wintney die of envy - their engine is not all-perspective

[Thrifty]

Really beautiful! !! I watched the video with the vaunted f35, so there, compared to the Su57, they can’t do anything at all - don’t fly, don’t maneuver how ours do it !!!

[Yaro Polk]

At 4 minutes, my heart skipped a beat

[Evil echo]

A bewitching sight !!! No small overloads probably withstand the pilots. Oh, live to see.

[Yaro Polk]

There was a post on this site, allegedly the Chinese say their 5th generation fighters are three times better, that I have not seen such turns from the Chinese, not to mention the Yankees with their "EFs"

[Colonel]

Beautiful, damn it, very probably Putin is to blame. I'm not talking about politics, just like that.

[Flanker27]

Group aerobatics are damp. One feels a fear of the pilots for the price of this bird. Single is also slightly dynamic. Maybe it seems because of the size. I would like to see the military commander who decides to use this golden aircraft in an armed conflict. Maximum launch of missile defense from the zone of missile defense. And close maneuverable combat is too much risk. All maneuvers with loss of speed lead to getting into a tactically disadvantageous position. And the use of weapons with zero speed is ineffective. AR B-B needs an initial speed. And the formula HEIGHT SPEED MANEUVER! tested over the years

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Flanker27

Single is also slightly dynamic. Maybe it seems because of the size

Not only. The operator seems to blame for the fact that the plane is sluggish, people with a video camera. Planes need to be able to take off.

[Constructor68]

Although it is an IFI, it’s a fighter for gaining air supremacy. His sikhiya is an air battle. Hence the tactics of application. Therefore the phrase

Maximum launch of missile defense from the zone of missile defense

not correct.
Close maneuver combat is certainly a risk. Just do not understand the phrase

All maneuvers with loss of speed lead to getting into a tactically disadvantageous position. And the use of weapons with zero speed is ineffective

firstly, not any maneuvering leads to a loss of speed. There are panes like the speed of a steady reversal. That is, the turning angle at which speed loss does not occur. It is different for different cars (depending on aerodynamic characteristics and thrust equipment) and pilots know about it. Secondly, why rolls into zero speeds? To fall into a corkscrew long before this? And most short-range fights take place at a speed of 0,6-0,8M. The following is simply not effective

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Flanker27

launch of SD from the zone unreachability Air defense.

Right Where not even air defense sigil.

[Alexey Sommer]

Quote: Flanker27

Group aerobatics are damp. One feels a fear of the pilots for the price of this bird. Single is also slightly dynamic.

For example, I did not notice the differences from the Su-35 in maneuvering for the worse.
What are your evaluation criteria?
Show a model example! Though reset the link?

[Grigory_45]

The on-board control system accompanies up to 60 targets, while firing at 16 of them

it’s all great, but there are so many weapons on board? ..

[Tuzik]

the previous generation set a very high level of aerobatics, so that nothing is surprising, for example, in this video 2:20

[Lord of the Sith]

Oh, the birds are good)) Hurry to the VKS

[Alexey Sommer]

The spectacle is simply mesmerizing!
And joy for our country that we can do this.

[Pevek]

Very beautiful aerobatics, I really liked it. Mesmerizing. And the drying is beautiful, in flight graceful. So it turned out.

[KCA]

He looked, they are deceiving us, this is not a plane, hell knows what, how to get up, any GOS missile will go crazy, and this is with the pilot with the helm, what will such machines do in UAV mode?

[depressant]

I watched all the videos, I listened to all the songs, and the holiday quietly stirred in my soul.
Pilots and planes are a great asset of the country. I am proud.

[DimanC]

It seems that flying kites with the contours of birds of prey soar at the airport. So it seemed on the footage of the Su-57 landing at the end of the video.