Military Review

In India, told about the intentions to acquire tanks T-14 "Armata"

92
The Indian press published material describing preparations for the visit of Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi to Vladivostok. Indian columnist Vishal Tapar writes in SP's Land Forces that one of the main topics that will be discussed at the summit will be the topic of military-technical cooperation - cooperation between Moscow and New Delhi.




At the same time, the topic of discussion of a possible purchase of Russian tanks T-14 Armata. The total amount of the new contract, according to this newspaper, is estimated at $ 4,5 billion. At the same time, Vishal Tapar writes that India is considering options to use the latest Russian T-14 tanks for mass replacement of T-72 tanks, which are in service with the Indian army.

It is additionally noted that the Indian armed forces are set to acquire other military equipment on the same Armata platform. It is stated that earlier an Indian delegation visited Russia, which included officers of mechanized brigades of the Indian Armed Forces.

The material recalls that India back in the 2017 year announced its intention to acquire 1770 combat vehicles. However, as always in the Indian version of recent times, the authorities are not going to buy finished products from foreign suppliers. They are trying, and in this case, will agree to work together in the framework of the Do It In India program in the country. It is not reported when exactly India will decide which of the foreign suppliers to make purchases as part of its tank fleet modernization program.

In indian the press recall that the first batch of T-14 Armata tanks in the Russian Armed Forces will arrive in the 2020 year.
Photos used:
Depositphotos.com
92 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 24 August 2019 13: 25
    +30
    Yes, and then one of the "Armata" will be in the United States for testing, just as the T-90 appeared ...
    1. Honest Citizen
      Honest Citizen 24 August 2019 13: 29
      +1
      Hindus are such Indians. It’s not even surprising.
      1. Shurik70
        Shurik70 24 August 2019 14: 09
        +20
        Exporting any equipment anywhere you can say goodbye to its secrets in advance.
        It is not for nothing that many exports are designated by a special "E" index.
        Since the S-400 of Turkey was sold (and after our plane shot down to it), then the T-14 will be sold.
        Hopefully with the index "E" (that is, removed by top secret nodes)
        1. lucul
          lucul 24 August 2019 14: 26
          +1
          Exporting any equipment anywhere you can say goodbye to its secrets in advance.

          I agree . There, the export of arms - $ 15 billion a year. This is not so much money for the Russian Federation. Rural households alone bring more money to the treasury than arms sales.
          1. Vladimir_6
            Vladimir_6 24 August 2019 15: 19
            +6
            Quote: lucul
            There, the export of arms - $ 15 billion a year. This is not so much money for the Russian Federation. Rural households alone bring more money to the treasury than arms sales.

            So it’s like that, but as they say - a chicken is full on a grain of grain.
            1. lucul
              lucul 24 August 2019 17: 08
              +5
              So it’s like that, but as they say - a chicken is full on a grain of grain.

              Yeah, Russia, for example, poured money into R&D of Almaty, say 10 billion, and to amers, if they get a copy, these technologies will cost 100 times less.
              Just for understanding - ours were chasing a war, for Me.262, in the hope of getting the whole, for a reason. Having got it, we managed to significantly enrich ourselves with technologies that otherwise would have had to be developed from scratch ...
              1. Vladimir_6
                Vladimir_6 24 August 2019 19: 31
                0
                Quote: lucul
                So it’s like that, but as they say - a chicken is full on a grain of grain.

                Yeah, Russia, for example, poured money into R&D of Almaty, say 10 billion, and to amers, if they get a copy, these technologies will cost 100 times less.

                "Undoubtedly, the Armata is the only tank in the world with an uninhabited turret, which dramatically increases crew survivability in battle. It would not be an exaggeration to say that it is head and shoulders above all known analogues, including the vaunted Israeli Merkava Mark4. But its price has already become Thus, Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov bluntly stated that the Armed Forces do not seek to massively purchase T-14s because of their high cost, preferring to increase the combat potential of the available military equipment through its modernization (read - to improve the T-72).
                The Indian army wants to acquire 1770 promising combat vehicles to replace the aging T-72 tanks. Possible alternatives include the Ukrainian Oplot and the South Korean K-2 Black Panther. https://www.interfax.ru/world/631707
                The main contender is the Russian T-14 "Armata" tank.
                But it’s not a fact that they’ll buy it. They will expose the conditions for technology transfer and assembly in India.
                So let's see what the results will be after the visit of Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi to Vladivostok.
              2. self-propelled
                self-propelled 24 August 2019 21: 16
                +1
                Quote: lucul
                Yeah, Russia, for example, poured money into R&D of Almaty, say 10 billion, and to amers, if they get a copy, these technologies will cost 100 times less.

                to receive material does not mean to obtain technology for its production. technologies are many times more expensive
              3. insafufa
                insafufa 27 August 2019 17: 37
                0
                Ours in Korea pursued a saiber much more energetically than for me
            2. RideMaster
              RideMaster 24 August 2019 21: 56
              -2
              4,5 lard transaction price maybe even this is not profit but the total price.
              Every month they put in a little capsule. Do not put a month in a capsule for 1770 armatures and for 15 years this will be abundant in case of war.
          2. venik
            venik 24 August 2019 18: 51
            +3
            Quote: lucul
            There, the export of arms - $ 15 billion a year. This is not so much money for the Russian Federation. Rural household alone brings more money to the treasury than arms sales

            ========
            Well, if you want Russia to turn into an "agrarian and raw material appendage" of the West ..... Well then - YES! We must limit ourselves only to the export of raw materials and agricultural products ...
            But the question is: Why is this technologically advanced countries (from China to the States) are so desperately squeezing the most advanced weapons into international markets ??? The struggle there goes "not for life, but to death!) ???? Why are they all so stupid?
            1. Honest Citizen
              Honest Citizen 24 August 2019 19: 21
              -1
              And why are these technologically advanced countries (from China to the States) so desperately squeezing the most advanced weapons into international markets ???

              Are you sure that these "perfect weapons" are without "tabs"? I am now tormented by vague doubts.
              1. venik
                venik 24 August 2019 21: 55
                0
                [quote = Honest Citizen] Are you sure that these "perfect weapons" are without "tabs"? I am plagued by vague doubts. [/ Quote]
                ============
                Are you sure that they are not in our technology ?? Vague doubts torment me now. [/ Quote]
            2. lucul
              lucul 24 August 2019 21: 48
              -3
              And why are these technologically advanced countries (from China to the States) so desperately squeezing the most advanced weapons into international markets ???

              Handshake frantically !!!!
              Well, let me tell you how the United States is desperately trying to sell Russia an F-22 with an F-35, and some Aegis in addition.
          3. self-propelled
            self-propelled 24 August 2019 21: 13
            +2
            Quote: lucul
            There of that export of arms - at 15 billion dollars a year. This is not so much money for the Russian Federation

            well, how to say small ... recourse in addition to the direct cost of weapons, there is also the cost of after-sales service - there is also a lot of money dripping.
            and the equipment is exported in a "cut-down" configuration.
            and there are also "gingerbreads" in terms of staking out a place for themselves and not letting competitors into the local market + military contracts are tightened by others, civilian, if you like ...
        2. private person
          private person 24 August 2019 15: 43
          -1
          Hopefully with the index "E" (that is, removed by top secret nodes)

          Well, and what would be a technique without these very nodes and why would it even be needed? Rather, for what? In the form of an exhibit? After all, these very secret nodes are the highlight of this technique.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 24 August 2019 18: 29
        0
        Quote: Honest Citizen
        Hindus are such Indians. It’s not even surprising.

        Their Wishlist are very developed, but how it comes down to it ...
      3. Amin_vivec
        Amin_vivec 24 August 2019 19: 04
        +2
        4,5 billion dollars at 3,7 million per unit ... well, let it be 4,5 per export unit ... these are 1000 tanks ... (1200 at the initial rate) Although not. They want technology and production. As a result, there will be a screwdriver assembly of 100 low-quality tanks - the rest will be stolen and still be faulty, they will refuse in the middle and they will begin to collect the abrams ...
    2. Artemiy_2
      Artemiy_2 24 August 2019 13: 29
      +2
      Are there really people who believe in this stuffing about the t-90? This is a complete bullshit
      1. svp67
        svp67 24 August 2019 13: 35
        +16
        Quote: Artemiy_2
        This is a complete bullshit

        And the Su-27, MiG-29, various air defense systems, the same S-300, many tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers of the Soviet model, also bullshit? And the "purchase" through Morocco of T-80U and Tunguska, also bullshit?
        1. Nevsky_ZU
          Nevsky_ZU 24 August 2019 13: 43
          +4
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Artemiy_2
          This is a complete bullshit

          And the Su-27, MiG-29, various air defense systems, the same S-300, many tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers of the Soviet model, also bullshit? And "buying" through Morocco T-80U and "Tunguska", the same bullshit?

          And why should this not be stipulated in contracts? For some reason, the countries where American equipment is operated are not being sold to us, even if it’s not NATO. Otherwise, they will receive a cap from the USA. But can’t we roll out such conditions, such as being locked for re-export without approval?
          1. Grigory_45
            Grigory_45 24 August 2019 18: 05
            -3
            Quote: Nevsky_ZU
            But we can’t roll out such conditions, such as locked for re-export

            this is always described in a counterattack, and tough sanctions follow for violations of this clause. But the presence of re-export should be proved.
        2. fif21
          fif21 24 August 2019 15: 08
          +4
          Quote: svp67
          And the Su-27, MiG-29, various air defense systems, the same S-300, many tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers of the Soviet model, also bullshit? And "buying" through Morocco T-80U and "Tunguska", the same bullshit?

          You forgot the study of the Russian submarine by the Americans in India. They trade in other people's secrets, and this must be taken into account. hi
          1. Nikolay Semirechensky
            Nikolay Semirechensky 24 August 2019 19: 19
            +1
            And where can I read about it? If this is true, then the information is glaring!
        3. nafanal
          nafanal 25 August 2019 18: 10
          0
          Well, what did they extract from this Tunguska or T-80 ... Have you tried to copy? They didn’t even try ... Tank development concepts are different ... So for general reference .. Even the hijacked top-secret planes they did not try to copy. Tea is not Chinese ...
      2. APASUS
        APASUS 24 August 2019 13: 47
        +5
        Quote: Artemiy_2
        Are there really people who believe in this stuffing about the t-90? This is a complete bullshit

        The creator of this rumor is Damian Ratka, an expert of the Polish magazine Nowa Technika Wojskowa ("New military equipment"). The appearance of this information can be treated differently, but I found something interesting on his page.

        Damian [email protected]
        Aug 21
        Others
        Destroyed the tower of the T-90A. They say that the photo was taken in the Crimea. So did the Ukrainians destroy him during the fighting? Or is it a victim of some kind of accident with the use of ammunition (this has already happened several times in Russian tanks in the past)? More questions than answers.

        An expert who can’t answer the question about the origin of the photo and, in fact, distributes the misinformation. He can confidently answer the question about the presence of the T-90 tank in the USA.
        1. svp67
          svp67 24 August 2019 13: 59
          -2
          Quote: APASUS
          An expert who can’t answer the question about the origin of the photo and, in fact, distributes misinformation

          The photo is not a "disinformation", and I did not find it in his comments either. He did not assert anything or where
          The answer could be given by these two of our "dashing" marines

          It may be worth remembering that the "marines" are guarding the perimeters of our bases in Syria, and there is already a network and such ... alas
          1. Voyager
            Voyager 24 August 2019 16: 38
            0
            You should not display such photographs for public display.
          2. DarkMatter
            DarkMatter 24 August 2019 16: 46
            +1
            I looked at the quick, there are five mentions of a tower photo in these of your tweeters. Everywhere they write that the photos from the landfill, that is, ours were tested. From there, and a photo with soldiers who could take a picture of the test results from the boredom at the training ground, heaps of such kind were dumped at the training grounds.
            Only the Pole decided to think, or maybe after some mythical military operations in the Crimea? Decide for yourself =)

            The second photo is the corpses of An-Nusra militants who stole a tank in Aleppo. Result on the face, there are no tanks that do not burn.
            P.S. And what about the marines in relation to this photo ?!
            1. svp67
              svp67 24 August 2019 19: 19
              0
              Quote: DarkMatter
              P.S. And what about the marines in relation to this photo ?!

              Because in the photo our soldiers, or rather sailors, have a chevron of the Russian Marine Corps on the right sleeve of one of them, and it can be clearly seen in the photo, as well as "sea" hats
              1. DarkMatter
                DarkMatter 24 August 2019 21: 03
                -1
                Where in the second photo are our soldiers? These are militants who hijacked a tank and paid for it. You all mixed up for something, Syria, photo left and so on. Reread your message again, and then mine =)
                1. svp67
                  svp67 24 August 2019 21: 08
                  0
                  Quote: DarkMatter
                  You all mixed up for something, Syria, photo left and so on.

                  Syria is the only place where our marines intersect with the T-90. So the top photo, most likely from there
                  1. DarkMatter
                    DarkMatter 24 August 2019 21: 17
                    -1
                    But what does it mean most likely, where does the marines again? This photo is generally screen of video report government channel SANA, whose icon is in the corner and is located.
                    I repeat once again, in the photo there are militants who stole a tank and went to fight on it. There it is even written with an arrow in red letters Al-Qaeda T90 driver, damn it)))

                    Why make further assumptions if everything is clearly written, who, where and when?

                    https://lenta.ru/news/2017/09/20/t90/
          3. APASUS
            APASUS 24 August 2019 19: 31
            0
            Quote: svp67
            He didn’t say anything or where

            Maybe you were looking badly or not at all?
            https://twitter.com/DRatka1
            Damian ratka
            The

            @ DRatka1
            Aug 21
            Others
            Destroyed T-90A turret. It's said photo was made on Crimea. So during fights Ukrainians destroyed it? Or is it victim of some sort of accident involving ammunition cook off (it happend several times in Russian tanks in the past)? More questions than answers.
      3. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 24 August 2019 18: 02
        -3
        Quote: Artemiy_2
        This is a complete bullshit

        the same "bullshit" as the MiG-29, Su-27 (which killed the American pilot), S-300, Torah, Strela, T-72, Mi-24 and many other Soviet-made equipment that fell into the hands of the Americans ...

      4. venik
        venik 24 August 2019 18: 44
        -1
        Quote: Artemiy_2
        Are there really people who believe in this stuffing about the t-90? This is a complete bullshit

        =======
        I am afraid no!
    3. Thrifty
      Thrifty 24 August 2019 13: 30
      +3
      Sergei
      hi the Yankees will be there as soon as the T14 crosses the Indian border!
    4. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 24 August 2019 13: 34
      +7
      And then the Americans will even say that we stole the technology from them and made Armata, and they themselves will start to produce similar cars and sell them to their vassals at a high price. As the analogs of our Kalash and RPG-7 are now doing.
    5. rocket757
      rocket757 24 August 2019 13: 34
      +2
      Maybe it will. Then export versions of the equipment do.
      Technological and military-technical espionage has not been invented today!
      So that it remains to invent, do the next generation of military equipment! Let them chase the ghost of military-technical superiority !!!
      Until they themselves begin to invent something, they will not catch him by the tail!
    6. Angelica
      Angelica 24 August 2019 13: 42
      +1
      svp67 (Sergey) Today, 13: 25
      Yes, and then one of the "Armata" will be in the United States for testing, just as the T-90 appeared ...

      Was the T-90 Indian?
      1. venik
        venik 24 August 2019 18: 43
        -1
        Quote: angelica
        Was the T-90 Indian?

        ============
        Alas! He was RUSSIAN! (Yes Yes exactly!). I also remember that "scandal" in the middle of the 90s .....
    7. loki565
      loki565 24 August 2019 14: 21
      +1
      So what, there is infa that in Russia there is the whole shot turret of the Turkish leopard, so to speak, we tested for breaking through.
    8. Dietmar
      Dietmar 24 August 2019 14: 58
      -1
      Hindus, like Arabs, will bargain for several years, put forward all conditions, then sign a contract, but they won’t be in a hurry, and bargain again, and again conditions, often impossible or contradictory to themselves ...
    9. venik
      venik 24 August 2019 18: 41
      -1
      Quote: svp67
      Yes, and then one of the "Armata" will be in the United States for testing, just as the T-90 appeared ...

      ========
      And you, my dear, were not interested, WHEN, and most importantly FROM WHERE Americans got a T-90 ??? No? So take an interest (at least on the Internet!). You will be VERY surprised!
    10. Vadivak
      Vadivak 24 August 2019 19: 06
      0
      Quote: svp67
      and then one of the "Armata" will be in the US for testing, just like the T-90 appeared.

      Export of tanks on the basis of "Almaty" is possible only after meeting the needs of the state defense order ....
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 25 August 2019 09: 14
        -3
        Quote: Vadivak
        Export of tanks on the basis of "Almaty" is possible only after meeting the needs of the state defense order

        how so must be.
        Alas, history knows the opposite. Only four examples: T-90 tanks and Su-30 fighters (first to India, then to itself), BMP-3 and ZRPK Pantsir (UAE, then native Defense Ministry flew up)
  2. Honest Citizen
    Honest Citizen 24 August 2019 13: 28
    +11
    Actually, first we need to equip our army with "Armatami". And by airplanes. And then as for export, so we do, but as for ourselves - so "in line" (c) Sharikov, M. Bulgakov "Heart of a Dog"
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 24 August 2019 13: 42
      +3
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      Actually, first we need to equip our army with "Armatami". And by airplanes. And then as for export, so we do, but as for ourselves - so "in line" (c) Sharikov, M. Bulgakov "Heart of a Dog"

      Now capitalism, in order to buy something from yourself, you first need to get the dough somewhere, but for this you need to either steal or sell
      1. Honest Citizen
        Honest Citizen 24 August 2019 13: 44
        +2
        in order to buy something from yourself, you first need to get the dough somewhere,

        To paraphrase a little: if you do not want to voluntarily feed your army, you will force-feed the alien.
        So capitalism, feudalism, communism - what's the difference. The army should not know the need for anything. Otherwise, others will come and take everything away.
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 24 August 2019 14: 08
          +1
          Quote: Honest Citizen
          The army should not know the need for anything

          Guns instead of butter? You’ll be the first to howl.

          Quote: Honest Citizen
          Otherwise, others will come and take away everything.

          They could have come - they would have come already. And if they didn't come, then everything is correct. The balance is met, and the "wolves" are fed, and the sheep are safe yes
          1. Honest Citizen
            Honest Citizen 24 August 2019 14: 10
            0
            Guns instead of butter? You’ll be the first to howl.

            The slogan under which all the Young Democrats "signed" during the collapse of the USSR.
            Already does not roll.
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 24 August 2019 14: 11
              -4
              Quote: Honest Citizen
              all young democrats during the collapse of the USSR

              I can also stick labels wink
              1. Honest Citizen
                Honest Citizen 24 August 2019 14: 13
                +1
                And what have the labels? I remember what "screams" were in the press during the period of "late perestroika", namely from 86-87. And that "military bases are a burden" and "guns instead of oil" ...
                So, alas, there were no labels here and there.
                1. Cat man null
                  Cat man null 24 August 2019 14: 19
                  -1
                  Quote: Honest Citizen
                  I remember what "screams" were in the press during the period of "late perestroika", namely from 86-87

                  Well, then you compare the ass with a finger. Moreover, the priest began precisely at the times you mentioned. And it's already over.

                  And the screams on the topic "oh, they are selling, and in the army - according to the residual principle" - they are a sign of childhood, my friend ... and it is in the priest yes

                  Well, of course, if it’s not trolling laughing
                2. serg.shishkov2015
                  serg.shishkov2015 24 August 2019 15: 43
                  0
                  And our defense from the beloved child became a scapegoat! Why not hang on her! Become guilty of everything! even the fact that the trees turn yellow ahead of time! I'm not lying! I heard this from my classmates! only had time to break out of his city!
          2. RideMaster
            RideMaster 24 August 2019 22: 03
            -1
            Gold and yuan instead of oil are of course fed
      2. Big Cat
        Big Cat 24 August 2019 14: 10
        +5
        In order to get the loot you just need to stop stealing. And for this to plant all the thieves.
        1. lucul
          lucul 24 August 2019 14: 23
          +2
          In order to get the loot you just need to stop stealing. And for this to plant all the thieves.

          To do this, you must necessarily ask - where does the money come from. Can not justify-confiscation ....
        2. Oyo Sarkazmi
          Oyo Sarkazmi 24 August 2019 14: 27
          +2
          The budget surplus in the first half of 2019 is 1,5 trillion rubles, which is $ 23 billion. Money is such that there aren’t enough thieves on it request
          1. RideMaster
            RideMaster 24 August 2019 22: 04
            +1
            And all in a little egg. Where can I allocate a couple of lards to the armature?
        3. Vol4ara
          Vol4ara 24 August 2019 16: 56
          0
          Quote: Big Cat
          In order to get the loot you just need to stop stealing. And for this to plant all the thieves.

          Not enough prisons
      3. lucul
        lucul 24 August 2019 14: 20
        0
        Now capitalism, in order to buy something from yourself, you first need to get the dough somewhere, but for this you need to either steal or sell

        Here you have it all, buy and sell)))
        For himself - barter. Did not hear about this?
      4. AU Ivanov.
        AU Ivanov. 24 August 2019 15: 26
        0
        Do not believe it, even during the years of World War II, weapons were bought from manufacturers.
      5. Vadivak
        Vadivak 24 August 2019 19: 09
        0
        Quote: Vol4ara
        and for this you need to either steal or sell

        First steal and then sell
    2. Chaldon48
      Chaldon48 26 August 2019 11: 11
      0
      I think that the whole point is in production facilities, high-tech equipment, which we have in short supply.
  3. Klingon
    Klingon 24 August 2019 13: 41
    0
    for ourselves, you first need to purchase, and even from the tests did not even come out. Interestingly simulators for driving training in Armata are available? on * TV * ride it is not in the hatch and not in the periscope to watch
    1. Big Cat
      Big Cat 24 August 2019 14: 12
      -4
      https://topwar.ru/145482-pochemu-tank-armata-ne-poshel-v-vojska.html
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 24 August 2019 14: 14
      -1
      Quote: Klingon
      it’s not for you to look through the hatch and not into the periscope

      Your speech gives you a deep connoisseur of armored vehicles laughing

      Hatches - they are on the bottom, they don’t look at them, sometimes they look at them.
      The periscope is on a submarine, there is no periscope on the tank request
      1. Klingon
        Klingon 24 August 2019 17: 06
        0
        Well then you understand what I mean? It doesn’t matter what these viewing holes / devices, triplexes are called, or what are they? Of course, I apologize, but if you try to describe medical examination devices, I think the same thing will happen. But they, too, can be described roughly by a concept like * probe * and they will understand you in principle
        PS. I still can’t help but wonder the visitors of VO, it’s worth writing some comment here as there is another couch Expert who will be smart and poke his nose. Is this some kind of website pathology?
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 24 August 2019 17: 29
          -2
          Quote: Klingon
          Well then you understand what I mean? It doesn’t matter what these inspection openings / instruments are called

          I understood something. But I also realized that you, not understanding the subject very much, nevertheless, are eager to advise everyone who understands it and makes decisions on what and how to do it.

          That is, you behave just like

          Quote: Klingon
          another couch Expert

          Not everyone here likes them, and there is a tradition of such "experts"

          Quote: Klingon
          poke

          Actually, that's all.
      2. garri-lin
        garri-lin 24 August 2019 18: 18
        0
        So there seems to be a notion of a microscopic observation device and a microscopic sight.
      3. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 25 August 2019 09: 12
        -3
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        The periscope is on a submarine, there is no periscope on the tank

        on BTVT there are periscope observation devices, or, on slang - a periscope or triplex. There are also periscope sights.

        Yeah, a panorama is a widescreen image or view of the area. But not a panoramic sight))) Because it is not in accordance with the instruction.
        To words less need to cling
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 24 August 2019 14: 02
    +7
    I don’t know about other VO “visitors”, but I’m already confused about Indian “Wishlist”! I think it's time to print a list of numbered Indian desires on the VO page, so as not to annoy your fingers about "Klava" once again, but to immediately indicate the number in the list. After all, how will it save time and space on the page! For example, India in 20 ... year wanted to acquire (2), and in the next - (3), (5) and (7); but then she changed her mind (7) and laid her eyes on (9), but in (9) she was temporarily refused, offering (8) instead!
    1. Big Cat
      Big Cat 24 August 2019 14: 13
      -3
      Maybe it’s not only in India?
  6. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 24 August 2019 14: 55
    +1
    With all due respect to the Great People of India, their military traditions, etc. something simpler would suit them better ...
    1. DPN
      DPN 24 August 2019 17: 26
      0
      They have the same class divisions as the US, they have oligarchs and paupers like the US, so why are they easier? What we had STRONG, we collapsed, so what is easier?. Want to say the poor will go for the oligarchs? doubtful.
    2. Grits
      Grits 25 August 2019 08: 21
      0
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      something simpler would suit them better ...

      It's like being judged - having a bunch of gratuitous money buy super new expensive equipment. But they manage to lose it in fluff on the Hussites in slippers armed with one RPG and AK of the 60th year of release
  7. Kars
    Kars 24 August 2019 16: 04
    0
    A repetition of history, and India will save a second time tank-building of the Russian Federation?
    1. garri-lin
      garri-lin 24 August 2019 18: 21
      0
      At what cost? T 90 received its own name Vladimir in honor of a man who sacrificed his health and life in an attempt to adapt the capabilities of the tank to Indian Wishlist.
  8. DPN
    DPN 24 August 2019 17: 19
    0
    Once, INDIA helped out, or maybe saved the Russian city from being, if it repeats it again, THANKS MANY THANKS!
  9. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 24 August 2019 18: 37
    -2
    It will not be soon. UVZ cannot fulfill the state order, but here the export ...
  10. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 24 August 2019 21: 19
    0
    They are much more logical than the T-90MS .... but insist that the gun was 82e and the optics with the thermal imager and the French connection.
  11. Gambit44
    Gambit44 24 August 2019 21: 44
    0
    Hindus are still rat-assed rats, you can’t trust them in any way.
    1. Chaldon48
      Chaldon48 24 August 2019 22: 39
      0
      And who can Russia trust?
      1. Gambit44
        Gambit44 26 August 2019 04: 10
        0
        Of course, only yourself is trusted, and everyone else is treated with great caution, especially with regard to the sale of new and most advanced military equipment for export. In particular, this primarily applies directly to countries such as China and India.
  12. Local from the Volga
    Local from the Volga 24 August 2019 21: 45
    0
    What nonsense !!!! Gypsies barely assemble a bike ... JUST THOUGHT HOW MORE AS HOW TO GET MONEY!
  13. Chaldon48
    Chaldon48 24 August 2019 22: 38
    0
    Well, here is the bazaar replenished with goods, now our MO will buy something.
  14. Sergey Russky
    Sergey Russky 24 August 2019 22: 42
    +1
    it’s not in vain .. for money and mother sell your own
  15. cat Rusich
    cat Rusich 24 August 2019 23: 38
    0
    I can advise the producers of "Armata" to stock up on "sedatives" - the dance with the Indians will be "long and passionate" yes
  16. kig
    kig 26 August 2019 02: 31
    0
    I don’t know how anyone, but when I look at Armata, the question arises: why is this projectile trap on the tower? It is clear that there is something necessary there, but they will certainly enter there, and no rebound is expected.
  17. Maxwrx
    Maxwrx 26 August 2019 20: 51
    0
    Hindus, hey! We haven’t sold you t-90s yet!
  18. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 26 August 2019 20: 58
    0
    First, it’s not fate to rearm your army, than to sell to any Papuans? Yes, and I guess on credit for our own money.