The floating power unit "Academician Lomonosov" went to Chukotka

81
The world's first floating atomic power unit (PSU) "Akademik Lomonosov" went to the place of operation in Chukotka. The solemn ceremony of sending took place today in Murmansk.

The floating power unit "Academician Lomonosov" went to Chukotka




The Akademik Lomonosov PES left the pier of Murmansk and set sail for a long voyage to the Chukchi port of Pevek. Swimming will be carried out with the help of tugboats, which will lead him as if on a stretched string. One tug will pull the power unit, and the other will hold it, providing braking. Next will follow the third, spare tug. It is planned that the average speed of the caravan under favorable conditions will be 4-5 knots (7-9 km / h), and it will take about three weeks to complete the entire route. Thus, in Pevek, "Academician Lomonosov" will be in the second half of September.

The floating power unit "Akademik Lomonosov" of the 20870 project is the head project of a series of mobile transportable power units of low power. Designed to work as part of a floating nuclear power plant for use in the Far North and the Far East. One floating nuclear power plant can provide electricity to a city with a population of thousands of people in 100.

Akademik Lomonosov will be delivered to the port of Pevek, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, where work is underway to build onshore and hydraulic structures for the nuclear thermal power plant (FNPP), which will include a floating power unit. It is planned that the first kilowatts of FNPP will be issued already in December this year, replacing the retiring capacities of the Bilibino NPP and the Chaun TPP.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    81 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +11
      23 August 2019 13: 56
      Where are the idiots from Greenpeace? You are welcome to freeze your asses in the Novaya Zemlya area.
      1. +14
        23 August 2019 14: 00
        Quote: 210ox
        You are welcome to freeze your ass in the area of ​​Novaya Zemlya ..

        belay ?? ... Chukotka and Novaya Zemlya, this is how to compare Plesetskaya and Volochkova)))
        1. +2
          23 August 2019 14: 00
          Well, they will go by ...
          1. +1
            23 August 2019 14: 21
            Quote: 210ox
            Well, they will go by ...

            yeah .... as many as 12 hours will go by
            1. 0
              23 August 2019 14: 27
              Quote: Tiksi-3
              Quote: 210ox
              Well, they will go by ...

              yeah .... as many as 12 hours will go by

              This is enough for them.
              1. +5
                23 August 2019 14: 37
                Quote: sir.jonn
                This is enough for them.

                so there is the Kara gate (30 km in total) ..... but ice is always .... without an icebreaker how will Greenpeace go there ???
                1. +5
                  23 August 2019 14: 56
                  Quote: Tiksi-3
                  Quote: sir.jonn
                  This is enough for them.

                  so there is the Kara gate (30 km in total) ..... but ice is always .... without an icebreaker how will Greenpeace go there ???

                  I know. I’ve been to the Kars Gate and around the New Earth my mother wound her up, I write that this snickering green and the Kars Gate is enough for my eyes to clean her own.
                2. +4
                  23 August 2019 15: 09
                  Greenpeace will use environmentally friendly transport - inflatable mattresses. Firstly, it is patriotic (MATTRESSES!), Secondly, it is environmentally friendly, thirdly, it is safe (greenpeace does not sink), and fourthly, the curators have already told them long ago - "row from here" - and they have not allocated money for a long time. The Greenpeace political project has been closed, now the onizhedeti political project is replaced by it
                3. +3
                  23 August 2019 15: 39
                  Quote: Tiksi-3
                  .without an icebreaker how will Greenpeace go there ???

                  Song to help them. tongue
      2. -4
        23 August 2019 14: 02
        At stationary nuclear power plants, a melt trap is provided, it is interesting how they solved this problem on a floating nuclear power plant. It will be very disappointing if in case of an accident the fuel gurgles to the bottom
        1. +3
          23 August 2019 14: 04
          I think that everything is thought out. In general, our experts took into account the sad experience both ours and foreign.
        2. +1
          23 August 2019 14: 07
          This is true. Great news! good Let there be Light - on a long polar night! good
        3. +5
          23 August 2019 14: 08
          Quote: Vol4ara
          At stationary nuclear power plants, a melt trap is provided, it is interesting how they solved this problem on a floating nuclear power plant. It will be very disappointing if in case of an accident the fuel gurgles to the bottom

          Probably not the "station of young technicians" designed and built.
          1. -14
            23 August 2019 19: 45
            This is true. From the station, young technicians made Losharik and were noted in Arkhangelsk.
            So sho is not worried about anything, all the hope for them.
            1. +1
              23 August 2019 20: 09
              Clearly, Mr. Yankees litter. Your one nickname says a lot about your focus. Are you one of these?



              [Center]
              1. -7
                23 August 2019 21: 39
                Dunce, I wrote to you that you are a provocateur and a liar. Kipelovo and Tu-142 to remind?
                Have you posted at least one YOUR photo where you served, at least one surname you have named.?
                I ask the second time. There is no answer. You don’t even get it.
                Conclusion, different people work from the account. That is, the bot is you :-) :-) :-)
                1. 0
                  24 August 2019 08: 18
                  And you, Mr. Smart and "expert in aviation", remind you how you could not distinguish Tu-142 from Tu-114? And I am not obliged to present my photos to every local troll with a rating of 13. There will be a lot of honor.
          2. -1
            24 August 2019 13: 48
            Quote: Piramidon
            Quote: Vol4ara
            At stationary nuclear power plants, a melt trap is provided, it is interesting how they solved this problem on a floating nuclear power plant. It will be very disappointing if in case of an accident the fuel gurgles to the bottom

            Probably not the "station of young technicians" designed and built.

            It would be so simple, there would be no accidents. I hope that the experience of Chernobyl and Fukushima was taken into account
        4. +3
          23 August 2019 14: 48
          While the FNPP stood near Murmansk, the reactor was driven out over the entire SPNI program, even 110% of the rated power was tested. HRM (melt localization device) is not used for such capacities.
          1. +1
            23 August 2019 18: 17
            That is why second Chernobyl is practically impossible on our modern reactors. Rosatom has the most stringent intra-industry requirements for automation and security.
            1. -9
              23 August 2019 19: 47
              Nude nude :-)
              Bald Alexandrov, shaking in front of Gorbachev with three golden stars, convinced him that his RBMK reactors did not explode.
      3. +12
        23 August 2019 15: 01
        Rosatom is 68% of the planet’s nuclear power plants under construction, 50% of all uranium enrichment on Earth, 60% of the global RTG market, the only company with cost-effective uranium enrichment technology, the only company capable of building and building atomic icebreakers, 3+ generation reactors, MOX closed fuel cycles, floating nuclear power plants, nuclear power plants and much more, 4 of the last five elements of the periodic table were created in Russia.
        Russia is a global leader in the nuclear industry.
        1. +10
          23 August 2019 16: 35
          Thanks to the IVS and Lavrenty Pavlovich, as well as to the hundreds of Soviet scientists who created the Soviet nuclear industry, whose heir is Rosatom!
          1. +1
            28 August 2019 10: 05
            Many thanks to Lavrenty Pavlovich, academicians Aleksandrov, Landau, Kurchatov, Afrikantov and many others! But we must also understand that back in the early 2000s, the nuclear industry of Russia was in a deplorable state, and it was over the past 15 years that not only a fantastic revival took place, but also a host of new competencies that neither Russian, Soviet nor even world science have mastered. possessed. Therefore, it is not only a matter of continuity of generations, but also of new competent personnel.
            1. 0
              28 August 2019 16: 19
              Quote: Sarmat Sanych
              Therefore, it is not only a matter of continuity of generations, but also of new competent personnel.

              Certainly!
        2. -1
          23 August 2019 19: 51
          Rogozin and his son need to go there :) interestingly, five years is enough for them to ruin everything, well, Serdyukov is in the wings ...
    2. +6
      23 August 2019 13: 56
      SEB "Akademik Lomonosov" left the pier of Murmansk and went on a long voyage to the Chukotka port of Pevek.

      Good luck!
    3. +3
      23 August 2019 13: 58
      We bring light and warmth to the whole world. hi
      1. +6
        23 August 2019 14: 06
        Even especially stubborn (RF Armed Forces) ... wink
      2. +1
        23 August 2019 14: 22
        Quote: K-612-O
        We carry light and warmth

        WE, forum users - we bring laughter and joy to people))
    4. 0
      23 August 2019 14: 04
      It is not clear why he was not made self-propelled. The energies above the roof ...
      1. +5
        23 August 2019 14: 13
        Quote: Igor Borisov_2
        It is not clear why he was not made self-propelled. The energies above the roof ...

        What for? After all, it is not intended to hang around the coast. Moreover, from it you still need to stretch the electric and heat supply systems. request
      2. +5
        23 August 2019 14: 34
        Quote: Igor Borisov_2
        It is not clear why he was not made self-propelled. The energies above the roof ...

        And to keep on staff a bunch of additional specialists who, due to the lack of constant seafaring practice, will destroy the FNPP as soon as possible.
        Thank! Do not! stop
        1. +2
          23 August 2019 14: 55
          it's nothing! in Soviet times, floating cranes without tugboats sailed down the Volga. We tacked with a grab!
          1. +2
            23 August 2019 15: 00
            Quote: karabass
            it's nothing! in Soviet times, floating cranes without tugboats sailed down the Volga. We tacked with a grab!

            With a fool you can and not come up with such rationalizers, and for our age is enough. The main thing is that they should not be allowed to floating nuclear power plants.
          2. KCA
            0
            23 August 2019 17: 00
            We have such a stand, under its own power, without tugs went "Bulgaria" to raise

            Austrian-built self-propelled diesel-electric floating crane with a lifting capacity of 350 tons, designed to replace gates at the locks of hydraulic structures, as well as to lift sunken ships.
            1. +1
              23 August 2019 17: 56
              Quote: KCA
              We have such a stand, under its own power, without tugs went "Bulgaria" to raise

              Austrian-built self-propelled diesel-electric floating crane with a lifting capacity of 350 tons, designed to replace gates at the locks of hydraulic structures, as well as to lift sunken ships.

              I had to watch how they work at the shipyards; on my vessel, the diesel engine was changed like that. The largest saw with a lifting capacity of 2500 tons at the GRYFIA shipyard in Shezin. The fact is that they have no seaworthiness and the mover is designed for independent movement in the water area of ​​a ship repair plant, or in the port area. Everything else except in calm weather under the responsibility of the captain.
              1. KCA
                0
                23 August 2019 18: 33
                So he did not walk by sea, along the Volga, although there is a breeze on the reservoirs, the same "Bulgaria" and sank, so to speak, in a "storm"
                1. +4
                  23 August 2019 19: 12
                  Quote: KCA
                  So he did not walk by sea, along the Volga, although there is a breeze on the reservoirs, the same "Bulgaria" and sank, so to speak, in a "storm"

                  River navigation is much more complicated than sea navigation; the combination of current, still water and narrowness is a very insidious thing. I have witnessed more than once when ships calling from a stream in a river channel, without having time to slow down, rammed everything that was in the direction of the pier into the port harbor. Even Experienced Professionals they don’t always manage because the wind, current, draft are variable and can bring quite a few surprises, which is why I write that the independent movement of low-maneuverable ships such as a floating crane without an accompanying tugboat is a gamble all the sad consequences of which will fall on the captain’s shoulders.
    5. +4
      23 August 2019 14: 11
      This is a very powerful thing ... There is no such thing in the world ... No one. We can be proud ...
    6. -1
      23 August 2019 14: 18
      Quote: Piramidon
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      It is not clear why he was not made self-propelled. The energies above the roof ...

      What for? After all, it is not intended to hang around the coast. Moreover, from it you still need to stretch the electric and heat supply systems. request

      Just gratuitous energy in bulk, and so three tugboats must be driven. Moreover, in Chukotka it wasn’t an eternal joke, but only until the completion of the FNPP construction, as I understand it. Why do floating cranes do self-propelled? Let the tugboats drag them ....
      1. 0
        23 August 2019 14: 29
        Quote: Igor Borisov_2
        and three tugboats must be driven.

        And what, you need to drive them every day?
        Moreover, in Chukotka it wasn’t an eternal joke, but only until the completion of the FNPP construction, as I understand it.

        Well, once in ten years, three tugboats are activated. And To make this construction self-propelled, for the sake of your whims, will cost more than one billion rubles.
        Why do floating cranes do self-propelled? Let the tugboats drag them ....

        Yes, here everything is clear to you. Compare the incomparable.
      2. 0
        23 August 2019 17: 36
        Into a free account for 100000 in the studio
    7. +3
      23 August 2019 14: 28
      Painted the same. And then minus here for the primer and not a neat appearance.
      1. +2
        23 August 2019 15: 35
        So I made the same comment. Apparently, during the test, painting was considered unnecessary costs.
        Now it’s a completely different kind.
    8. -2
      23 August 2019 14: 31
      Quote: Tiksi-3
      this is how to compare Plesetskaya and Volochkova

      and what, is there a difference between these broilers?
      1. +2
        23 August 2019 14: 44
        Quote: yehat
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        this is how to compare Plesetskaya and Volochkova

        and what, is there a difference between these broilers?


        Yes, and its (difference) size is comparable to the depth of the Mariana Trench both professionally and intellectually (naturally Volochkova "at depth" in both cases), and your term "broiler" refers ONLY to Volochkova. However, I am sure that you are not really ignorant, so as not to know this.
      2. 0
        23 August 2019 15: 07
        Quote: yehat
        and what, is there a difference between these broilers?

        In principle, it is the same as between the nuclear-powered icebreaker Yamal and Arktika. The difference is noticeable from afar only to a specialist:
        1. +1
          23 August 2019 15: 12
          clearly, one is white, the other is black. the difference is drop dead.
          I’m joking so much, of course I know who Maya Plesetskaya is and who Volochkova is.
          simply, if you give an example, then such that everyone understands.
          If I tell from my sphere a specific comparison as Tal with Portisch, few will understand.
      3. 0
        23 August 2019 15: 44
        Quote: yehat
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        this is how to compare Plesetskaya and Volochkova

        and what, is there a difference between these broilers?

        Awesome! One is really prima, and the other, God forgive me.
        1. 0
          23 August 2019 22: 24
          Quote: lis-ik
          Awesome! One is really prima, and the other, God forgive me.

          The second lived not during the first. In addition, I think that you reach the second, in terms of achievements - the same pipe dream as the first. So for most of those present here, they are both equally far and unattainable.
    9. -6
      23 August 2019 14: 35
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      This is a very powerful thing ... There is no such thing in the world ... No one. We can be proud ...

      right? do these firewood work?
      1. +6
        23 August 2019 14: 45
        Quote: yehat
        do these firewood work?

        These do not bring "light and joy to people." These "crap" are. Do we need it?
        1. 0
          23 August 2019 15: 13
          rather they bring light without joy ...
      2. 0
        23 August 2019 14: 47
        And these are actually Mars toys. She can only wear shit democracy. But Lomonosov brings warmth and light to people. Someone with a sword, and some with good. Something like this...
        1. -10
          23 August 2019 17: 42
          Clearly, Lomonosov’s bulb :-)
      3. 0
        23 August 2019 18: 09
        Well then, they themselves still have not done? And you can see the photos of Peter the Great and Dmitry Donskoy to feel
        1. +1
          24 August 2019 01: 10
          Well then, they themselves still have not done?


          For the first time, floating reactors were used in the United States to provide energy for the Panama Canal in the event of the threat of a deliberate failure of the ground-based energy supply system (1966–1976) and the American research base in Antarctica (1962–1972).

          an expensive kilowatt is obtained, and they don’t. Only where there is nowhere to go.
    10. -11
      23 August 2019 14: 47
      "One floating nuclear thermal power plant can provide electricity to a city with a population of 100 thousand people."
      Yes, or the same 100 thousand people with light energy, if something goes wrong, and then others, where the wind blows. And, well, yes, we are not Israel, in some places it will be possible to live.
      1. +1
        23 August 2019 17: 38
        What about the hydropower plant?
      2. 0
        23 August 2019 18: 12
        If you had no idea about modern nuclear energy, especially in Russia, you would go to smoke aside. At our modern reactors, the probability of a catastrophe is reduced to zero.
    11. +1
      23 August 2019 14: 48
      Good news!! Good luck!!! good
    12. +1
      23 August 2019 14: 52
      For a long time they wanted to close the Bilibino NPP. Now for sure.
      1. 0
        23 August 2019 22: 03
        For a long time they wanted to close the Bilibino NPP. Now for sure.

        Yeah. Went to replace.
    13. -2
      23 August 2019 14: 54
      Could immediately gash it self-propelled, there would be no need to caress.
    14. 0
      23 August 2019 14: 56
      It would be interesting to look at the switchgear at this station.
    15. 0
      23 August 2019 15: 00
      Well, who writes this, huh? "A stretched string" is the surest way to arrange an accident, because the so-called so-called "good nautical practice" just prescribes, during sea towing, to eject the tug to such a length that it swims in the water and plays the role of a shock absorber in rough seas, and it is always at sea, even in calm weather.
    16. 0
      23 August 2019 15: 10
      Quote: sir.jonn
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      It is not clear why he was not made self-propelled. The energies above the roof ...

      And to keep on staff a bunch of additional specialists who, due to the lack of constant seafaring practice, will destroy the FNPP as soon as possible.
      Thank! Do not! stop

      The crew there is permanent and not needed, but only a ferry, with constant marine practice. And if every ten years you can send three tugboats, then the crew once every ten years can also be sent. Navigation, communications and radar systems, I think (not visible in the photo) and life support, it is equipped. And the installation of propeller shafts with screws and small stroke motors (up to 9 knots) I don’t think is a very costly problem ......
    17. -1
      23 August 2019 15: 20
      Quote: Galleon
      It would be interesting to look at the switchgear at this station.

    18. -2
      23 August 2019 15: 49
      Quote: lis-ik
      Awesome! One is really prima, and the other, God forgive me.

      didn’t it occur to you that the Lord himself should apologize for the presence of Volochkova?
      I am somehow not inclined to consider myself "his" slave and eternal debtor, who always asks for forgiveness.
    19. -2
      23 August 2019 16: 12
      This is power !!!!! This means pushing it to any shore, stretching the cable and cheap email. energy please build what you want to master the territory ..
      1. 0
        24 August 2019 01: 24
        and cheap email. energy please


        Unfortunately, not cheap. About how to heat the stove in rubles. In the middle lane (for example, in the Crimea) it will not pay off. There are just areas where this is the only real way to get electricity and heat in the right amount.
    20. -9
      23 August 2019 17: 41
      Here is the Chukchi spared :-)
      As in the village Lavka arrived with goods.
      And they will change electricity for skins, as in "Chief of Chukotka"?
      1. +2
        23 August 2019 18: 42
        Quote: NAVI
        Here is the Chukchi spared :-)
        As in the village Lavka arrived with goods.
        And they will change electricity for skins, as in "Chief of Chukotka"?

        You would have everything as in the 90s ....

        But the West knew that there were rich resources and this one with Chubais was also understood by everyone ..
        What the country led to, we all know! negative
        Crimea lost and most importantly the Arctic! Just stick in there, not only frostbite your noses ..
        1. -6
          23 August 2019 19: 50
          The North does not pay off. Maybe only diamonds.
          Therefore, people from there and scratched in the early 90's .... and I am among them :-)
          1. -2
            23 August 2019 20: 23
            Quote: NAVI
            The North does not pay off. Maybe only diamonds.
            Therefore, people from there and scratched in the early 90's .... and I am among them :-)

            The North Arctic can cover the entire budget of Russia for many years .. This has long been proven! While there are mostly military, they are preparing everything .. hi
            Liberastov and greenpeace, how cold it is to send hehe
            And the North will pay off with interest in future generations .. Perhaps now !!!!
            1. -6
              23 August 2019 21: 42
              Proven by whom?
              While the people were sent there, work was carried out.
              I want to live now, about communism and each family a separate apartment, I already heard enough.
    21. 0
      23 August 2019 18: 56
      Well, he really good luck! Well, normal engineers to connect! Who was there has an idea about networks!
    22. +2
      24 August 2019 02: 05
      Quote: yehat
      Quote: lis-ik
      Awesome! One is really prima, and the other, God forgive me.

      didn’t it occur to you that the Lord himself should apologize for the presence of Volochkova?
      I am somehow not inclined to consider myself "his" slave and eternal debtor, who always asks for forgiveness.

      It may come to mind that Heavenly Father must apologize only to utterly idiots. If there were no bastards and villains on Earth, you would not have distinguished Volochkova from Plisetskaya. And he died full and d and about that ... Doodles are needed. In order for others to be brought up on their example. And you are a wonderful witness to this.
    23. 0
      25 August 2019 11: 37
      And in the event of an emergency, it will be possible to simply sink the reactor and that’s all ...
      In general, of course, a powerful and necessary thing.
      Slightly reduces the volume of northern deliveries in terms of fuel.
    24. 0
      25 August 2019 12: 00
      I am very pleased. All Pevek is waiting!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"