Military Review

The US State Department spoke about the reason for the "violation" of the INF Treaty by Russia

76
The United States has once again accused Russia of violating the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate and Shorter Range Missiles. The US State Department said Moscow violated the INF Treaty "because of increasing threats around its borders."


The US State Department spoke about the reason for the "violation" of the INF Treaty by Russia


The US Department of State has published a new report on US compliance with its various arms control, non-proliferation and disarmament agreements. In this document, the United States once again blames the termination of the INF Treaty on Russia, saying that Moscow has developed the 9M729 missile, which "clearly violated the provisions of the treaty."

The United States has determined that Russia is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to own, not to produce and not to conduct flight tests of ground-based cruise missiles with a flight range of 500 to 5500 kilometers, and also not to have or not to launch launchers for such missiles

- the report says.

The State Department claims that Russia has become disillusioned with the INF Treaty for a long time and has been constantly looking for reasons to withdraw from the treaty, as "it could not own ground installations with medium-range missiles." The first attempts to "make it clear" that Moscow wants to leave the INF Treaty, according to American officials, appeared back in 2004 under Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov, and in 2006 the Russian government allegedly began talking about the need to deploy ground-based missile installations in Russia medium range.

According to the United States, Russia's decision to violate the INF Treaty arose on the basis of many years of disappointment that it was forbidden to own medium-range land-based missiles, even though the alleged threats within these ranges increased around its borders

- declared in the State Department.

Recall that the INF Treaty ceased to exist on 2 this August after the United States officially left it, and on August 18 the Pentagon tested a ground-based medium-range missile. At the same time, Washington has denied allegations that these developments have been ongoing for a long time. According to Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Robert Carver, the United States began to develop missiles only after it suspended its participation in the treaty.

Earlier, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that the costs of developing new missiles in Washington were laid down in advance, even before the country left the treaty, because they knew that they would withdraw from it, shifting the blame to Russia.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
76 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mixanchik
    Mixanchik 22 August 2019 19: 25
    +9
    The United States will regret it and ask for negotiations themselves .. This we have already gone through in our history. soldier
    Arms races, as in the days of the USSR there will be no gentlemen, do not even hope .. Everything will be easier! soldier
    1. AUL
      AUL 22 August 2019 19: 30
      +20
      Quote: Mixanchik
      On August 2 this year, after the United States officially left it, and on August 18, the Pentagon tested a ground-based medium-range missile.

      Well, nimble guys are there, beyond the puddle! In 2 weeks we developed, manufactured and tested a new product! Cool!
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 22 August 2019 19: 56
        +6
        Quote: AUL
        Well, nimble guys are there, beyond the puddle! In 2 weeks, we designed, manufactured and tested a NEW product! Cool!
        Ha! I also drew attention to this.

        Yeah! American warriors from the Pentagon shamelessly lie to the US State Department that they allegedly made and tested a new product in 2 weeks - it's like they go to the toilet for a large part in a public place according to the principle "The State Department and US congressmen calmly grab all the crap from them ! "
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 22 August 2019 20: 10
          +6
          My respect, Tatyana! love
          Quote: Tatiana
          supposedly in 2 weeks they made and tested a new product

          Tales of lying they are masters. My grandmother would have been told this: she loved to listen to fairy tales, and she herself poisoned that your boatswain ...
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 22 August 2019 20: 19
            +4
            Hi Paul! hi
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Tales of lying they are masters.

            Fundamentally NEW Product for such terms do not make and do not test!

            The Americans left the INF Treaty, exclusively having ready-made missiles in the coffers.
            And soon we will learn that they have these missiles and the installations for their launch in terms of quantity in the United States, that there is supposedly nowhere to put them to them.
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 22 August 2019 20: 22
              +2
              Quote: Tatiana
              A fundamentally new product cannot be manufactured or tested in such a time!

              Exactly . Preventive strikes with the charge of what they themselves are to blame for - the policy of mattresses.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
            2. sabakina
              sabakina 22 August 2019 20: 32
              +2
              Tatyana, the same story with nuclear warheads. They stupidly did not know what to do with them, so they just stored it. BUT! A nuclear warhead is extremely unstable. How the old warhead will behave only God knows ...
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Mixanchik
            Mixanchik 22 August 2019 20: 29
            +2
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            My respect, Tatyana

            And mine, too, Tatyana love
            Quote: Tatiana
            Yeah! The Pentagon’s American warriors shamelessly lie to the US State Department that they allegedly made and tested a new product in 2 weeks,

            These dogs live by this .. Milosevic was right, before his death, he sent us a message to the Russian Slavs. hi
            Do not trust, do not fear, do not ask ! So far, Russia has such tactics .. But for now, negotiations will soon be requested
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 22 August 2019 20: 49
              +2
              Quote: Mixanchik
              And mine, too, Tatyana
              Mutually! hi
              Quote: Mixanchik
              Milosevic was right, before his death, sending us a message to the Russian Slavs.
              You will remember Milosevic more than once for this message to the Russian Slavs with a kind word!
              Bright memory of him from us!
    2. abc_alex
      abc_alex 22 August 2019 19: 48
      +8
      Quote: Mixanchik
      The United States will regret it and ask for negotiations themselves .. This we have already gone through in our history.

      No, they don't care about these missiles. Such missiles will not reach them, so they can poke them all over Europe without any problems for themselves. And partly Asia.
      Europeans, like last time, can boil, but now the wrong European has gone ... No.
      1. Mixanchik
        Mixanchik 22 August 2019 20: 39
        -1
        Quote: abc_alex
        Quote: Mixanchik
        The United States will regret it and ask for negotiations themselves .. This we have already gone through in our history.

        No, they don't care about these missiles. Such missiles will not reach them, so they can poke them all over Europe without any problems for themselves. And partly Asia.
        Europeans, like last time, can boil, but now the wrong European has gone ... No.

        Who is Europe, we have known for a long time that from the first, that from the Second World War .. This time we will not behave and we know all the "hornets' nests" and there is something to immediately extinguish, no matter how far they are. (Even if the last the active submarine will remain, or even the missile in the mine.) I am not threatening, just keep in mind gentlemen. hi You brought us too much grief and disaster, and again the wave is coming .. soldier
    3. SHIPS
      SHIPS 22 August 2019 19: 59
      -12
      She's already coming, wake up :-)
      Easier what? The Iron Curtain and going abroad as in the USSR, for the elite?
      1. meandr51
        meandr51 22 August 2019 21: 58
        +3
        Bearers of secrets and now are not allowed. True, not as strict as before. I have a border guard neighbor at the airport who is not allowed to travel abroad.
        1. SHIPS
          SHIPS 23 August 2019 08: 52
          -1
          C'mon, the same five years after leaving. Even me with the first form was released after six.
      2. Lopatov
        Lopatov 22 August 2019 22: 33
        +5
        Quote: NAVI
        She's already coming, wake up :-)

        True, only Great America is involved in it. Having a military budget of almost half the global 8))))

        Quote: NAVI
        Easier what?

        The simplest thing is that the Americans regularly shoot themselves in the legs. As with this contract. Its termination is not beneficial exclusively to the United States. Because the contract was executed exclusively by us.
        And they still have to restore the system of contracts. But it will never be so beneficial for them.

        The Americans, thanks to their great wisdom, got two enemies instead of one enemy and a powerful situational ally. With all the consequences.
        1. SHIPS
          SHIPS 22 August 2019 22: 52
          -8
          Hmm .... how everything is running :-)
    4. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 22 August 2019 20: 02
      +2
      Quote: Mixanchik
      The United States will regret it and ask for negotiations themselves .. This we have already gone through in our history. soldier
      Arms races, as in the days of the USSR there will be no gentlemen, do not even hope .. Everything will be easier! soldier

      This is yes. We now have a lot of completely frostbitten ones. So I think too. Someone will give the command and then "suddenly goodbye clouds" soldier . I myself am so
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 22 August 2019 20: 06
        +3
        I live by the principle: "since such a booze has gone, cut the last cucumber"
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 22 August 2019 22: 42
          0
          Quote: igorbrsv
          "since such a booze has gone, cut the last cucumber"

          So, in the lobby, as they say, to smear the snot - here it will no longer be up to reflections. yes Although, I am sure, there are such that even in the midst of the database they will scratch their turnips, wondering: maybe this is so bad and evil ??? am
    5. jojick
      jojick 23 August 2019 01: 44
      -1
      Does it bother you that all this is happening stupidly due to the fact that this modest agreement does not include the PRC, Israel and all other users of "tactics"?
    6. Karaul14
      Karaul14 23 August 2019 02: 44
      -3
      Quote: Mixanchik
      The United States will regret it and ask for negotiations themselves .. This we have already gone through in our history. soldier
      Arms races, as in the days of the USSR there will be no gentlemen, do not even hope .. Everything will be easier! soldier

      Of course it won’t, the Russian Federation doesn’t understand this race simply, the Soviet economy accounted for 40% of the US economy, and the Russian economy less than 10% of the US economy, which is why the United States withdrew from this treaty.
      1. Alex Justice
        Alex Justice 23 August 2019 10: 29
        0
        The Russian Federation does not understand this race simply, the economy of the USSR accounted for 40% of the US economy, and the Russian economy less than 10% of the US economy, which is why the United States withdrew from this agreement.

        Nuclear war is not possible, but someone will make good money on new missiles. All just for the money.
  2. ochakow703
    ochakow703 22 August 2019 19: 27
    +8
    Recall that the INF Treaty ceased to exist on August 2 this year after the United States officially left it, and on August 18, the Pentagon tested a ground-based medium-range missile.
    They can work! For 16 days - from the culmination to the start !!!
    1. D16
      D16 23 August 2019 07: 12
      0
      A stand for the Mk-41 marine launcher with a hot start was welded. Peremoga! laughing Ours with the same success will be thrust into the launch of the 3M14 Escander instead of the R-500. Only after this will a full-fledged mobile medium-range missile system be obtained, and not an American raskoryak, cobbled together in haste. Type America Strong fellow
  3. K-50
    K-50 22 August 2019 19: 27
    +12
    Moscow has developed a 9M729 missile that "clearly violated the provisions of the treaty."

    Moscow has developed, but for some reason does not test it at full range.
    The Pin Dos niki did not violate the INF Treaty, but they have already tested a missile, and from the MK-41 launcher, identical to those located in Romania and Poland. Moreover, the financing of these works began a year ago, when there were no "shouts" about Moscow's violation of the INF Treaty. As well as there are still no facts of such a violation, except for the indiscriminate cries of overseas "partners".
    But Russia is still to blame.
    As in Krylov's fable: "... you are to blame for the fact that I want to eat ..." (c)
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 22 August 2019 20: 29
      +3
      But what difference now is who first violated. Leave this to the story. We are now living in new realities. And there is no need to lament here. We need to adequately counter the threats. We have no other choice. And who is good and who is bad is no longer important. This is of no interest to anyone.
      1. SHIPS
        SHIPS 22 August 2019 22: 56
        -6
        There was a way out. Fork 2012 and then March 2014.
        As my instructor said at the school, "Don't be pi, they won't have." This is a bland option :-)
  4. Dietmar
    Dietmar 22 August 2019 19: 34
    +9
    Quote: "The State Department claims that Russia had become disillusioned with the INF Treaty for a long time and was constantly looking for reasons to withdraw from the treaty, since" it could not own ground installations with medium-range missiles. "

    But what about the Caliber missiles? Russia showed them SPECIALLY back in 2015 to everyone. If it is even possible to reach Lisbon or London from the Caspian, why should Russia "land" these missiles? After all, the Americans have already let slip that the Chinese missiles are haunted by them, and the INF Treaty prevented them from acting against China.
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 22 August 2019 22: 00
      +1
      And just like the USA. Caliber is a sea rocket. They were not limited to any contracts. Have you heard about the American Tomahawks?
      1. Albert1988
        Albert1988 22 August 2019 22: 11
        +5
        Quote: meandr51
        And just like the USA. Caliber is a sea rocket. They were not limited to any contracts. Have you heard about the American Tomahawks?

        Exactly! Precisely, that they were not limited, from that and amers itched at the most I can not. What was the essence of the INF Treaty? Most of the amerskih of these same RIACs were naval and air-based, and the Soviet ones were ground-based by 90 percent. Thus, thanks to Gorbachev (to call him a traitor or simply "alternatively gifted" - whatever you like), we lost the overwhelming majority of such missiles, and the Americans only a small one. And now there are "calibers" - sea missiles. not limited by contracts. That's all - it becomes unprofitable for amers to observe the agreement. because that. for what it was started - the maximum restriction of the INF from Russia - no longer exists ...
  5. taiga2018
    taiga2018 22 August 2019 19: 48
    +5
    The United States was the first to withdraw from the treaty, and Russia, according to their own words, was looking for a reason to withdraw from it ... So the US withdrawal became the reason ... Such American "logic" will be swallowed up to the tonsils only by the satellites standing in front of the United States on their knees ...
  6. igorbrsv
    igorbrsv 22 August 2019 19: 54
    +5
    Enough to play the fool. Everyone knows that sea launch missiles can easily become ground-based. And nobody forbade sea and air launch. And Russia produced several offspring at once. Which is not like the Americans. They thought there were axes, okay. And here the couple began to lag behind with hypersonic missiles. Yes, the caliber was certainly no worse than an ax. And the theoretical information on the range of our missiles from ground launch was. With a caliber of up to 3000km. What Iskander freaking at 5000km. There were simply no violations. We have. Just everyone with a reserve ...
    It's time to send already this ambitious "exclusive" "nation" (rabble). There is no agreement. Walk the Americans through the forest. And now to do it openly and announce the priority goals in advance. Air defense / missile defense of NATO of the nearest neighbors with their inevitable death. And explain why. To clear the shortest path for Poplar to America. And that the delivery vehicles and their performance characteristics are officially confirmed. And the amount of flight time to show. It's not like they won't reach the bunker in Romania. They won't even have time to notify. I'll wait for them in hell if that am
    There is nowhere to hurry
    1. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 23 August 2019 10: 40
      -1
      And now do it openly and announce the goals in advance of priority. Air defense / missile defense of the nearest neighbors with their inevitable death. And explain why. To clear the shortest path to the Topolis to America. And that the delivery vehicles and their performance characteristics are officially confirmed. And the amount of flight time to show.

      The West is only at hand, an excellent trump card. The militaristic lobby will start shouting that they are threatening us, we need more money for weapons.
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 23 August 2019 11: 06
        0
        And if now you don’t knock the shoes on the table, threatening yourself with a kuzkin’s mother, they will shout even louder. Russia and China have sat up at the UN. Russia was blamed. Let them officially admit that they will die defending the interests of their master. Though they should have an awareness of this. Are they all genetically modified there, without the instinct of self-preservation. After all, it is laid down in humans at the genetic level. And now genes tell me that it is necessary to define a firm position. A shoe on the table!
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 22 August 2019 20: 00
    +5
    Late to drink Borjomi .....
    Just draw crosses on the maps and show them, tell those who wish to have such whale rockets at their place, what IM will be for it, if that!
    Not to politicians, they were bought in the bud, but to burghers, villagers and other urban shushira!
    After all, nothing new, and not so long ago!
    One thing is worrying, the average man is grown up on films about the apocalypse and it's hard to reach his dull brain!
    The force of inertia of thinking is very difficult to overcome.
  8. seacap
    seacap 22 August 2019 20: 04
    +2
    When, finally, our "leaders" begin to solve their affairs and defend the interests of their state without looking back at others, they will just as firmly and categorically fight with someone else's hands. at every opportunity.
    1. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 22 August 2019 21: 48
      +1
      Here's about the best exactly said. People for us and now fit into the ground. And sometimes it becomes a shame to remain on the sidelines. Let's hope this will serve as a unifying factor among us. So different. It’s time, perhaps, to walk through the "neighboring regions" and explain to them that they were wrong. Maybe leave them independence even once again. If so give up
  9. kind
    kind 22 August 2019 20: 16
    +2
    But the point of return is passed. Now the United States will spoil Russia, in response to its powerlessness in front of the new Russian weapons. Already in START-3 they want Russia to abandon new developments in the field of armaments. All their policies are built on provocations, especially if they are inferior to anyone in anything. Say there is no new weapon or technology in the US, this must be banned around the world. The whole problem is that they do not know how to negotiate and try to quarrel us with the whole world.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 22 August 2019 20: 23
      +3
      The problem is that they know how to buy, bribe, intimidate and crush ... this is their playing field, their rules, we can’t do anything there. It is necessary to create another, alternative, and this is an arch-difficult work and you must have seven spans of mind!
    2. meandr51
      meandr51 22 August 2019 22: 03
      +2
      On the contrary, they can. We need to learn from them like this "negotiate".
  10. Slavenin82
    Slavenin82 22 August 2019 20: 34
    +2
    In everything that mattresses declare, you need to insert the word "USA" instead of "Russia"! Then everything falls into place!
  11. Thrifty
    Thrifty 22 August 2019 20: 35
    +2
    In fact, the absolute world champions in lies are these rotten USA! And, most importantly, their Euro-slaves stupidly believe any lies emanating from a rotten United States.
    1. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 23 August 2019 11: 06
      0
      Now Champions in lies Ukraine.
  12. Well done
    Well done 22 August 2019 20: 38
    0
    And I didn’t even read. In addition to the title. And so everything is clear. Well surprise us with something original, exclusive! Are washed up. In a dream. I will consider the violinists or recall the sanctions. Hypnotic!
  13. alexmach
    alexmach 22 August 2019 20: 42
    +1
    At the same time, Washington has denied allegations that these developments have been ongoing for a long time. According to Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Robert Carver, the United States began to develop missiles only after it suspended its participation in the treaty.

    Well, in principle, for those half a year they could have completely prepared their tomahawk for testing.
    1. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 22 August 2019 21: 51
      0
      Prepare, but not modify.
      In the sense of "the plan is ripe" for a long time
      1. alexmach
        alexmach 22 August 2019 21: 57
        +3
        Prepare, but not modify

        What is there to refine? The rocket is 40 years old. The first combat use by land was in 91 in Iraq. Constantly refined, now it’s either version 4 or version 5. She could strike on land, approach targets at a low altitude, she always knew how, do you think that in order to launch a rocket starting from a military landing ship on a ship from a similar military landing ship only on land do you need any improvements at all? Type in the absence of pitching can not start? Or do you think putting this VPU on a chassis with a lifting mechanism is an unrealistically difficult refinement?
        1. igorbrsv
          igorbrsv 22 August 2019 22: 03
          0
          Here I am about that. Everything was calculated in advance. Just eyes closed on it. Officially, for twenty days, they finalized it and tested it turns out. Well, the dog is with them. Our missiles can do no worse
          1. alexmach
            alexmach 22 August 2019 22: 06
            0
            Officially, for twenty days, they finalized it and tested it turns out

            Well, it doesn’t work out. They already had half a year after the suspension of the contract.
            1. igorbrsv
              igorbrsv 23 August 2019 00: 02
              0
              Unilateral suspension? Not terminated by both parties? And the question is, what could they have done twenty years ago? Like Russia with the caliber family. But they officially came out on August XNUMX. If only they kept the limits of decency. And then they are like a widow not grieving. And the hangers-on are happy about something. They are what Trump promised paradise and duty free. I'm sorry I drank a little. I can inaccurately formulate a thought.
              In general, I think we need medium- and short-range missiles for defense much more needed than the same amers for attack. Let them roll with their contracts and no longer remember them. Why do they also offer us some options? They need? Well, go go em, or hend hoh
              1. alexmach
                alexmach 23 August 2019 08: 10
                0
                Unilateral suspension? Not terminated by both parties?

                And what do you think suspension means? Not a refusal to comply with contractual restrictions? Do you think you can stop it and continue to comply?
                In general, I think we need medium- and short-range missiles for defense much more necessary than the same amers for attack

                Here vryatli. Russia is clearly in a more vulnerable position with respect to the United States in terms of attacks by these same missiles. We have more banal neighbors, and a huge number of them are American vassals.
                And the hangers on the main thing rejoice something

                They hope for a repetition of the collapse of the USSR, a new perestroika and all that.
                1. SHIPS
                  SHIPS 23 August 2019 08: 57
                  -3
                  A rhetorical question.
                  And after what actions of the USSR and the Russian Federation, all these neighbors wanted to become US vassals. Poland 1939, Baltic countries, Czechoslovakia 1968, Georgia 2008, Ukraine 2014 ......
                  1. igorbrsv
                    igorbrsv 23 August 2019 09: 34
                    0
                    The United States has long been hobbling Georgia and Ukraine. And what about Poland and the Baltic states? They have no complaints against Germany request
                    And the USSR has not died for thirty years.
                    We can say that Russia abandoned them and they were forcedly laid down under the United States. So what are they singing about their independence then. They would say immediately people we are bonded request
                    And then when they talk about it, they’re offended
                    1. alexmach
                      alexmach 23 August 2019 14: 20
                      0
                      We can say that Russia abandoned them and they were forced to lay down under the USA

                      Poland with the Baltic states then? Well, no, they themselves wanted to. since the 80s
                  2. Alex Justice
                    Alex Justice 23 August 2019 11: 15
                    +1
                    [quoteA after what actions of the USSR and the Russian Federation, all these neighbors wanted to become US vassals. Poland 1939, the Baltic countries, Czechoslovakia 1968, Georgia 2008, Ukraine 2014 ......] [/ quote]
                    The reason is the standard of living. There will be a better standard of living in Russia than in the West everyone will be drawn to Russia. The law of lace panties.
                2. igorbrsv
                  igorbrsv 23 August 2019 09: 38
                  0
                  . Russia is clearly in a more vulnerable position with respect to the United States in terms of attacks by these same missiles. We have more banal neighbors, and a huge number of them are American vassals.

                  Exactly. And what will we do when we are surrounded by air defense? It will be necessary to destroy them in the first place. And here better than medium- and short-range missiles no one can handle. Then let it be officially
                  1. alexmach
                    alexmach 23 August 2019 14: 22
                    0
                    And here better than medium and short range missiles no one can handle

                    Do not reach the same. Or are you talking about positional areas in Europe. Then yes.
                    Exactly. And what will we do when we are surrounded by air defense?

                    Withdraw warheads into space for example?
  14. Old26
    Old26 22 August 2019 21: 01
    +4
    Quote: AUL
    Well, nimble guys are there, beyond the puddle! In 2 weeks we developed, manufactured and tested a new product! Cool!

    Don't pay attention to propaganda. The Americans tested a version of the Tomahawk missile known as the TLAM (Tomahawk Land Attack Missile) from a ground launcher. That is, in translation "Tomahawk" intended for striking the coast (on land) has been produced since 1986. Has a range of up to 1600-1800 km. There is nothing new in this rocket. The first modification, known as RGM / UGM109C Block-II in the series since 1986, has a range of 1250 km. Could only strike straight ahead. Most likely this rocket no longer exists in nature. The next modification of the RGM / UGM109С Block-IIА already had a range of up to 1600 km, could strike both from a hill in a dive and undermine the target. There were also modifications RGM / UGM109С Block-III, RGM / UGM109D Block-II, RGM / UGM109D Block-IIB, modification RGM / UGM109Е Block-IV "Tactical Tomahawk". Here is one of these modifications, they tested, apparently taking half of the Mk-41 launcher. By the way, this, by the way, was confirmed by Putin today during an interview, saying that an already existing sea-based missile was tested. The novelty of the tests is a launch from a ground-based launcher ...
  15. Local from the Volga
    Local from the Volga 22 August 2019 21: 02
    +1
    Forget and grind! Do your thing!
  16. SHIPS
    SHIPS 22 August 2019 21: 46
    -2
    Funny photo
    The missile is long and thin, the general is small and thick.
    Two are trying to twist the phones to fit somehow. :-)
  17. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 22 August 2019 21: 50
    +2
    On August 2, they left the INF Treaty, and 18 already launched the Tomahawks from a ground launcher.

    The price of promises and all contracts with the USA is worthless. We destroyed our missiles and carriers, and meanwhile they were building up universal sea-based cruise missiles, which in a couple of weeks had already been converted into a tactical missile system on land.
    1. Terenin
      Terenin 22 August 2019 22: 18
      +2
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      On August 2, they left the INF Treaty, and 18 already launched the Tomahawks from a ground launcher.

      The price of promises and all contracts with the USA is worthless. We destroyed our missiles and carriers, and meanwhile they were building up universal sea-based cruise missiles, which in a couple of weeks had already been converted into a tactical missile system on land.

      hi
      This is how decent people differ from the scum who live by the principle of "deceiving your neighbor and spit on the bottom ..."
    2. alstr
      alstr 22 August 2019 23: 48
      +2
      In fact, the Americans turned up with this test very cool. And even it’s not about the INF, but about the missile defense.
      Now the argument that launchers in Romania and Poland cannot be used on tomahawks is a complete mess. Because according to their own statements, they were able to modify the launcher for launching from the ground from scratch in TWO weeks.
      1. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan 23 August 2019 12: 58
        0
        Of course, they did it stupidly, but enlightened citizens of Europe and Asia would not care if they did not receive a shocking blow from Russia.

        It is necessary to accelerate the work and make Iskander missiles from 500 to 5500 km. And to keep in their sights everything that could threaten Russia at this distance.

        And this is -


        Let it be a reminder of the meanness of the West.
    3. SHIPS
      SHIPS 23 August 2019 01: 00
      -4
      Pioneer precision 500, second Pershing 30 meters.
      By the way, by inertial accuracy Pershing in Russian missiles is still unattainable.
      And they cut it. And who asked our so many Pioneers to rivet?
      "Do you want to be advanced, this square nest"
      1. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan 23 August 2019 13: 03
        0
        Life asked, the threats against the USSR were not only from Pershing, but also from thousands of NATO aircraft, all this had to be smashed before they could fly into the air and bomb us like Vietnam at one time, while spraying the surviving chemicals .

        Do you want to live in peace? Always be ready for war!
  18. CommanderDIVA
    CommanderDIVA 22 August 2019 22: 05
    -1
    Was there any sense in this treaty for us and the Americans at present? Vsezh understand that no one has stopped working on missiles with a range of 500 to 5500 km since the signing of the treaty of the USSR and the United States, and other countries of the nuclear club also probably have developments on carriers of this class, otherwise we and the Americans will continue to comply with other regulations quietly will be stamping missiles of the specified range. Conclusion - if you sign a new treaty then everyone
  19. Islam G
    Islam G 22 August 2019 22: 25
    0
    And most interestingly, they all believe or pretend they believe, especially Grandma Merkel
  20. eagle owl
    eagle owl 23 August 2019 00: 22
    +1
    Meanwhile, it seems that their own firefighters caught the US government in a lie about 9/11. In plain text, that the explosives were laid in the buildings before the arrival of the aircraft in them ...
    https://www.activistpost.com/2019/07/ny-fire-commissioners-call-for-new-9-11-investigation-citing-overwhelming-evidence-of-explosives.html
    1. SHIPS
      SHIPS 23 August 2019 00: 56
      -5
      And the Americans were not on the moon and lynch blacks.
      1. Alex Justice
        Alex Justice 23 August 2019 11: 19
        0
        And all of them are in slaves, except for Russia and China.
      2. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan 23 August 2019 14: 06
        +1
        In addition to the towers # 1 and # 2 of the twins of the World Trade Center, the third tower # 7 crashed into which no plane crashed.

        Tell me why tower # 7 collapsed?
  21. Chaldon48
    Chaldon48 23 August 2019 01: 49
    0
    I don’t know which of Russia's neighbors, even with medium-range missiles, but in my right mind, for no reason at all, I would threaten Russia with these missiles.
  22. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 23 August 2019 02: 52
    +1
    "Highly-like" and nothing new !!! One thing is not clear. Where is America and where is Europe?
  23. Ehanatone
    Ehanatone 23 August 2019 04: 35
    0
    And the hive here is comments, 3.14ssy is 3.14ssy
  24. mkop
    mkop 23 August 2019 08: 45
    0
    Recall that the INF Treaty ceased to exist on 2 this August after the United States officially left it, and on August 18 the Pentagon tested a ground-based medium-range missile. At the same time, Washington has denied allegations that these developments have been ongoing for a long time. According to Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Robert Carver, the United States began to develop missiles only after it suspended its participation in the treaty.

    Do I understand correctly that this lieutenant colonel claims that the United States created a rocket in 16 days? What are these statements made for? Who in their right mind would believe this?