SAM Bavar-373 (Iran) - an analogue of the C-300?

55
Over the past few years, the Iranian industry has been developing a new Bavar-373 long-range anti-aircraft missile system. On Thursday 22 August, Iran marked the Day of Defense Industry, during which the first official display of the latest air defense systems in full was held. It is alleged that the Bavar-373 product surpasses some existing foreign air defense systems in its characteristics and is comparable to the most modern models.





From design to products


The development of the Bavar-373 project was first announced in 2011, and by that time some components of the complex had been built, which were necessary for testing. The creation of a new air defense system was associated with the impossibility of obtaining Russian C-300 systems. It was decided to independently create the necessary long-range air defense systems.

Over the next few years, tests and refinement of the complex were carried out. At the same time, various information on the progress of the project and the assembly of certain products appeared in official and unofficial sources. From a certain time, the industry began to demonstrate the individual components of the complex. As a result, this made it possible to compose a complete picture and determine the technical appearance of the air defense systems.

On the eve of the Day of Defense Industry, Iranian television for the first time showed a complete set of Bavar-373 air defense systems. In addition, the Ministry of Defense indicated the readiness of the project for serial production and delivery of equipment to the troops.



22 August, a new sample formally presented to the public. During the festive events, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani made a curious statement. According to him, Bavar-373 is stronger than Russian-made S-300 air defense systems. In its characteristics, it is close to the newer C-400. However, the comparison methods were not specified.

Thus, the Bavar-373 project went through all the necessary stages and reached the adoption stage. In the foreseeable future, new air defense systems will have to enter the troops and complement the existing air defense systems.

Technical details


Bavar-373 is a long-range air defense system for use in object-based air defense. The facilities of the complex are based on multi-axle automobile chassis, which provides quick transfer and deployment to positions. In this case, before starting work, some preparation is required. In terms of the general appearance and composition of the facilities, Bavar-373 is similar to other air defense systems of its class.

The new type of air defense system consists of two vehicles with radars for various purposes, a command post and several self-propelled launchers. The defeat of targets is carried out with the help of several types of missiles, including the latest Sayad-4, which provide maximum characteristics of the range and altitude of the defeat.



According to foreign data, radar detections from the Bavar-373 air defense system are capable of monitoring the situation at ranges up to 400-450 km and tracking up to hundreds of targets. Simultaneous firing at six targets using 12 missiles is provided. Apparently, the command post and radar from the anti-aircraft complex can work within the framework of a common control system and exchange data with other air defense systems or air defense systems.

A self-propelled launcher for air defense systems carries four transport and launch containers with missiles of various types. The rocket is launched vertically, “hot” way without the use of declination engines. The combat characteristics of the Bavar-373 depend on the type of missile used. So, the latest Sayad-4 missiles should hit targets at ranges of the order of 200 km and altitudes up to 27 km. It is possible to use other missiles with different characteristics.

With the help of compatible missiles, the Bavar-373 complex must hit aerodynamic and ballistic targets of various types. This SAM can attack planes and helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles of various types, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles of certain classes.



The Bavar-373 air defense system has high expectations. It is the first long-range anti-aircraft system created by Iran independently. The new class complex will have to complement existing systems of other types and significantly increase the potential of Iranian air defense. According to recent reports, the industry is ready to supply serial equipment to the army. Accordingly, the deployment of air defense systems will begin in the very near future.

Iranian achievement


First of all, the fact of the appearance of the Bavar-373 air defense system and its bringing to the series and operation is interesting. Iran has long been developing its own air defense systems, but so far has not had success in the field of long-range systems. In the past, it was planned to purchase foreign samples to resolve this issue, but the delivery was delayed for several years, and Iran had to launch its own project.

From the first announcement of the Bavar-373 air defense system to News About eight years passed on deliveries to the troops. During this time, Iranian enterprises completed the development of all the required components, as well as tested and refined. In the near future, the army will receive its first long-range air defense systems. Thus, despite the known difficulties, Iran continues to develop its air defense.

According to official data, the development of all components of the new air defense system was carried out independently and without the help of foreign countries. Probably, Iranian experts took into account foreign developments and achievements, but there is no question of a direct borrowing of technologies. Earlier, among other things, they received a refutation of the version of Russian participation. According to official figures, Iran did not contact our country about the purchase of modern air defense systems or the required technologies.



The level of the obtained characteristics can serve as evidence of the independent development of the Bavar-373 air defense system with the Sayad-4 missile system. According to the declared parameters, the Iranian complex is similar to the Russian C-300PMU2, created in the late nineties. Thus, repeating the Russian ideology of developing air defense systems, Iran is still two decades behind. At the same time, the Iranian president said that Bavar-373 is superior to C-300, although it did not provide any details and did not disclose methods of evaluation and comparison.

Whether Iranian industry will be able to narrow the gap is not known. At the same time, the country's leadership intends to continue the development of its weapons and equipment. The result of this in the future may be new models, the capabilities of which will be comparable with the modern developments of foreign countries.

Despite lagging behind the leading countries, Iran has secured an advantage over the states of its region. None of the countries in the Middle East can produce long-range air defense systems like the Bavar-373. Their armies have equipment of this class, but these systems were purchased from third countries. Own production is absent, due to which Iran is in a better position.

Air Defense Prospects


To date, Iran has been able to create a developed layered air defense system that covers the entire territory of the country. The armament consists of complexes of short, medium and long range. The latter category is currently represented by only four divisions of the Russian S-300PMU2 air defense systems, delivered several years ago. In the near future they will be strengthened by the technology of their own Iranian production.



The consequences of this are obvious. The deployment of the production of the Bavar-373 air defense system will allow continuing re-equipment without dependence on foreign suppliers and the international situation, as well as with optimal spending. In fact, now the plans for the development of long-range air defense systems depend only on the needs and capabilities of the Iranian army.

The appearance of the Bavar-373 product can also be considered in the context of the military-political situation in the region. Recently, relations between Iran and foreign countries have noticeably worsened, which leads to known risks. In such a situation, new high-performance air defense systems combined with other air defense systems may turn out to be the most important argument preventing the transition of disputes into a real collision.

In general, the latest news about the Bavar-373 project shows Iran’s desire and ability to create anti-aircraft missile systems of all major classes with sufficient tactical and technical characteristics. Iranian industry is lagging behind the leading countries of the world in this area, but all the necessary measures are being taken to narrow the gap and ensure the necessary level of development of air defense.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -7
    23 August 2019 07: 16
    100% copy-paste with -300.
    1. +6
      23 August 2019 07: 27
      Quote: pogis
      100% copy-paste with -300.

      In which place?
    2. -1
      23 August 2019 08: 14
      To date, Iran has been able to create a developed layered air defense system that covers the entire territory of the country.

      However, in the event of war, all these Arab / Persian / Middle Eastern generals take excellent money and merge the country, as was the case in Iraq, Syria, Libya ... because both there and there are capitalism of average fluffiness.
      1. -3
        23 August 2019 08: 29
        The modern State of syphids is striking. There is evidence that they themselves could not be developed without the help of China, and the ruins were not complete. Elemental base they do not produce their own. Only for them there is no concept of allies and partners and they are not reliable allies. They have one interest in them and I consider stupid relations about them in our media
      2. 0
        23 August 2019 11: 09
        Can I have some examples? And where does the generals and the military-industrial complex?
        1. +1
          23 August 2019 12: 03
          Quote: Red_Baron
          Can I have some examples? And where does the generals and the military-industrial complex?

          "... the first nail in the coffin of the Iraqi resistance was driven by one of the commanders of the special forces of the Republican Guard, Saddam Hussein's cousin, General Mahir Safiyan al-Tikriti. When the Allied troops stood at the gates of Baghdad a week ago, representatives of the CIA came out to the general. Having received security guarantees for themselves and of his entourage, Mahir Safiyan al-Tikriti, who was in charge of the defense of a part of the capital, promised to surrender the city without a fight and withdraw his troops from it.
          Next came a chain reaction. The commander of the 4th corps of the Iraqi army, which held strategically important positions in the rear of the allies near the city of Amara on the Iran-Iraq border, entered into a conspiracy with the Americans. In exchange for the same security guarantees, the corps left its position, losing it to the only battalion of the US Marine Corps. In the same way, the 10th armored division of the Iraqi army survived.
          The allies have made similar deals with Saddam's generals in northern Iraq. "

          For the rest, everything is on the Internet. The notorious "donkey with gold" still takes cities.
          1. +1
            23 August 2019 13: 27
            Iran is not Iraq. There Islam is a little of the wrong system.
          2. -1
            23 August 2019 16: 11
            Yes, I understand everything, but what does the military-industrial complex mean?
            And at the expense of capitalism there, I’m not quite sure, and not in it, it seems to me just the point.
        2. 0
          23 August 2019 12: 19
          The experience of finding the Shiite clergy in power in the Safavid era can be called the “black page” in its history. Firstly, the deification and indulgence of the power of the shahs, which often acted contrary to religious precepts, undermined the authority of the Shiite clergy as a whole. Secondly, the attempt to achieve a monopoly and “squeeze out” the Sunnis from Iran ultimately turned around him and contributed to the collapse of not only the ruling dynasty, but also the clergy itself, which was brutally persecuted under Nadir Shah.
          1. -2
            23 August 2019 12: 26
            The collapse of Iran is just around the corner. And all this splendor is temporary. If they still receive nuclear weapons, then our fate is not enviable.
            1. +2
              23 August 2019 13: 25
              Whose is this yours? Doge, if you are this state of Israel, then Iran is unlikely to go to nail you with nuclerenbaton. There is no sense, and staff members immediately harnessed the same nuclearbaton.
              1. -4
                23 August 2019 14: 10
                I meant the Russian Federation with such allies as China, Iran and Syria, we do not need enemies. There was such an anecdote about the Romanians Iosif Vissarionovich Romania decided to help the Germans beat. Well, that’s good. Zhukov’s answer, we don’t have free divisions to protect the Romanians from the Germans. My answer to you is that we do not have free divisions to guard the hedgehog of Iran Syria was enough with the head.
                1. +6
                  23 August 2019 14: 41
                  Quote: insafufa
                  My answer to you is that we do not have free divisions to guard the hedgehog of Iran Syria was enough with the head.

                  It is especially amusing to read this, knowing that it was thanks to Iran that we did not have to send a full-fledged "limited contingent" of ground forces to Syria. Because the Iranian IRGC has in fact become the backbone and main support of the "anti-radical" forces in both Syria and Iraq.
                  Quote: insafufa
                  I meant the Russian Federation with such allies as China, Iran and Syria, we do not need enemies.

                  Are you proposing to take the Saudis and their fosterlings as allies? To get Iran and Syria "from the other side", and in addition, Yemen and Afghanistan? wink
                  1. -1
                    23 August 2019 20: 27
                    I have great skepticism about the IRGC. If you analyze the situation. That ksir without our participation almost slept all over Syria. And in all dangerous directions without the guys from the MTR, this cannon fodder would be grinded. Because of such allies, our boys died more than once there. am
                2. +1
                  23 August 2019 16: 34
                  insafufa (Insaf) Today, 14:10
                  I meant the Russian Federation with such allies as China, Iran and Syria, we do not need enemies.

                  Perhaps you know which allies are "right" or "good"? Announce. Please be kind.
                  1. -1
                    23 August 2019 20: 16
                    Have you forgotten from the Russian Federation only two allies Fleet and Army ,,, am
                3. -1
                  23 August 2019 16: 50
                  You, like some of our Israeli colleagues, have some kind of Nazism. And that country is bad and the people in it are worthless, and this one too. But there are only one problems with these.
                  1. -1
                    23 August 2019 20: 37
                    Why be surprised if these warriors are primarily hucksters, and then soldiers. The times of the Prophet Muhammad may Allah be pleased with him. The basis of his army was his companions and the Yemeni infantry of these warriors in the blood. The Iranian army of the Iraqi military has been dead with corpses for ten years, these two states have fought and almost always Iraqis beat these Iranians. And Israel is always a big loss when meeting with the regular army of Iraq.
                    1. -2
                      23 August 2019 22: 00
                      You know, it happens differently in life. For example, Who will now look at the army of Norway, Denmark, Sweden. And when they put it right, everyone who comes across. And Sweden, even during the Napoleonic Wars and later was one of the strongest armies in Europe.
                      In general, the belligerence of these countries is now less relevant. But production and economics will be more important and more complicated.
                      1. 0
                        26 August 2019 09: 46
                        I said they were primarily hucksters and then the warriors sold the T90s either to Iraq or India to the amers. Well, how to coexist further with such allies am
            2. +3
              23 August 2019 14: 36
              Quote: insafufa
              The collapse of Iran is just around the corner. And all this splendor is temporary. If they still receive nuclear weapons, then our fate is not enviable.

              The Islamic Pakitstan, which is not too friendly to us, has had its means of delivery for a long time. And what - how is our fate?
              1. -2
                23 August 2019 16: 43
                Quote: Alexey RA
                And what - how is our fate?

                almost. I, for example, expecting to siss every day.
                1. +2
                  23 August 2019 17: 02
                  Quote: Red_Baron
                  I, for example, expecting to siss every day.

                  Well this, soldier, doesn’t matter! Such is today's environmental situation. They all succumb ... I succumb ... And even the commander-in-chief wakes up, it happens - but according to the situation! Well, because of this, do not give the last debt to the motherland? We will define your shameful affliction as a feat: we will send to paratroopers. There you will also start to fight.
                  © DMB laughing
                  1. -2
                    23 August 2019 17: 06
                    phew, I knew that everything was fine with me. laughing
              2. -1
                23 August 2019 20: 20
                That's about Pakistan, you shouldn’t have passed this Afghan way. Pakistan has been knocking on us for ten years now. Ours so far have sewn him up because of the Hindus who in recent years are increasingly looking at the zapod.
    3. -3
      25 August 2019 10: 06
      Quote: pogis
      100% copy-paste s-300

      actually the Iranian version of the American Standard and Patriot.
  2. +2
    23 August 2019 07: 22
    They copied, did not copy .... if there is no desire to make a claim from the developers, then pof everything.
    Let it be the same or better, all the same model of previous years of development .... they now need to saturate the troops with this equipment, train the personnel / rocketry, otherwise there will be nothing to talk about!
  3. 0
    23 August 2019 07: 29
    Dear author, it is clear that you are not an expert in the field of air defense, but before writing this:
    Rocket launch verticallyHot way
    , you at least look at the photos of PU laid out in the publication. Tilted, is not vertically No.
    1. +2
      23 August 2019 08: 03
      Sergey, below I gave a link to the news - there is a video. In my opinion, vertically.
      1. +4
        23 August 2019 08: 10
        Quote: asv363
        Sergey, below I gave a link to the news - there is a video. In my opinion, vertically.

        Yes you are right. In the video, the missiles are launched vertically. In the photo in the article, the TPK is tilted, like on the Patriot air defense system.
    2. 0
      25 September 2019 18: 23
      In the photographs, installations are in the process of deployment. An expanded installation places the missiles vertically. For example:
  4. 0
    23 August 2019 07: 33
    I mean, no country in the Middle East can produce its own air defense systems? And Izg'ail?))) There comrades are not the worst air defense systems rivet. All the same, the Soviet engineering school))
    1. 0
      23 August 2019 10: 07
      "And Izg'ail?))) There comrades are not the worst air defense-missile defense systems rivet. All the same, the Soviet engineering school))"
      The chosen ones, apparently, are associated more with the west than with the east, they just were lucky with the positioner precisely near the Arabs ...
      Although, according to some reports, they themselves are not at all a bit Arabs, slightly modified by some advanced someone ... belay
      1. 0
        23 August 2019 13: 48
        Yes, in many ways you are right. Israel is truly Eastern Europe in the Middle East.
    2. 0
      23 August 2019 16: 06
      Well, actually, in fact, not a single country in the Middle East can completely produce its own air defense systems, and those countries that they themselves collect, are able to use and what to produce like Iran and Israel, do it on the basis of technology and / or cooperation with the USSR, USA, China, DPRK, EU and Russia.
  5. 0
    23 August 2019 07: 57
    For news in English from the Press TV site, right at the beginning there is a video of demo launches. Unlike what I saw earlier - launchers, in my opinion, are standing (and rising) vertically, the rocket also starts vertically. Well done Iranians!
    https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/08/22/604153/Iran-missile-system-Bavar373-President-Rouhani-Defense-Minister-Hatami
  6. -1
    23 August 2019 08: 04
    The Iranian military industry, in recent times, has begun to do well, too.
    1. -2
      23 August 2019 11: 19
      And in what? I have a feeling that while their industry is stealing the development a little or making their own on their basis. But even they cannot be provided in sufficient quantities. Or release modern competitive technology.
      Although it seems to me, nevertheless, the path is good from donkeys and copper pans, to technology from which 1 step to the modern. Although for such a large country, again it seems to me that the scale of production is not amazing.
      1. 0
        23 August 2019 11: 22
        Even if they steal something, it is also necessary to be able to recreate it, while they still have a good result.
        1. -2
          23 August 2019 11: 25
          Not bad. But with developed industry, you can fill up the region with your weapons and equipment. Or saturate your army well.
          That, so far, as I understand it, no.
          1. 0
            23 August 2019 11: 41
            They have only purchased weapons so far, but now they are still starting to build up their own, like this.
            1. -2
              23 August 2019 17: 03
              Unfortunately, I was not specifically interested in Iran, and I can only say some general things. But the same Cornets, they copied in 2007, it seems a year or earlier. But in the Middle East they accuse that if the Cornet was used then the Russian one. Logically, Iran should overwhelm the Middle East with its version. Small arms, a cheap and relatively simple technique. But they are not. Everywhere you throw it, either old Soviet or Chinese. Their tank - Zulfikar, which is still trash, roughly say. Also, the latest version released about a hundred pieces. Development issues are not particularly worth it - there are almost none. Implementation issues are also not worth it. That's who in that region really develops the military-industrial complex very well and has excellent capacities so this is Turkey.
              And Iran has been increasing everything since the beginning of the 2000s, but so far it has not increased much. Rather, it’s better to be honest - it does not increase to any significant levels.
              1. 0
                23 August 2019 17: 58
                They have some good developments, here is an article for you as an example.
  7. 0
    23 August 2019 09: 20
    View this air defense in battle only remains if the Iranians knocked down an American UAV then the pluses to this complex will be added
    1. -1
      23 August 2019 11: 15
      Uh, but is a UAV really a serious goal, especially for a complex of similar range and power?
  8. 0
    23 August 2019 09: 32
    According to official figures, Iran did not contact our country about the purchase of modern air defense systems or the required technologies.

    And what was that then?
    Completed supply of C-300PMU-1 divisions to Iran
    October 13 2016

    https://topwar.ru/102035-zavershena-postavka-divizionov-s-300pmu-1-v-iran.html

    Recall that the contract, the total value of which was estimated at 0,8 billion dollars between Moscow and Tehran, was concluded in 2007 year. Through 3, Russia supported anti-Iran sanctions banning the supply of offensive weapons, which caused a lot of controversy. Disputes arose if only because C-300 has nothing to do with offensive weapons. Iran was going to collect “penalties” from Russia by appealing to international courts, but the situation was resolved.

    More recently, Russia began shipping C-XNUMPPMU-300 divisions to Tehran. The first batch was sent to Iran in April of this year. In total, including the final batch, Iran received through the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation five divisions of anti-aircraft missile systems.

    C-XNUMPPMU-300 - export version of the C-1PM air defense system. The declared maximum speed of the guided missile is 300 thousand m / s. The number of goals followed is up to 2,1.
    1. -1
      23 August 2019 11: 14
      Quote: Nait
      And what was that then?
      Completed supply of C-300PMU-1 divisions to Iran
      October 13 2016
      https://topwar.ru/102035-zavershena-postavka-divizionov-s-300pmu-1-v-iran.html

      Perhaps it was precisely what was written that was meant - modern. PMU-1 in my opinion from the beginning of 90 are issued.
  9. 0
    23 August 2019 09: 37
    Quote: ButchCassidy
    I mean, no country in the Middle East can produce its own air defense systems?

    It doesn’t say so:
    None of the Middle East countries can issue air defense systems yet large range like "Bavar-373".

    The Israeli dome is not long-range.
    Although they have great successes, not so long ago a satellite was hit directly by a rocket with their direct hit.
    1. 0
      23 August 2019 09: 58
      Quote: Nait
      The Israeli dome is not long-range.

      in Israel there are a couple of air defense missile defense systems other than the Dome
  10. -1
    23 August 2019 15: 32
    It is difficult to judge by what is Iranian in this complex and what is copied from someone.
    In my unenlightened opinion, it seems that the radar has an active phased antenna array (AFAR), in contrast to the passive phased (AFAR) used in C300PMU. Further, the principle of launching and managing missiles in the initial part of the trajectory also differs from that used in C300. Well, the size of the TPK make it possible to doubt that the missiles of this complex have the same performance characteristics as those of the C300 missiles.
    Everything else is already a question of the energy consumption of the SAM fuel, the computing power of the digital computer, algorithms for processing radar information and control of the air defense missile system, and much more, which is still a thing in itself because it is unknown. In addition, it must be remembered that the Iranians have repeatedly demonstrated a "cardboard fool" instead of real "hardware". But misinformation is not only their methods. All of them sinned and are sinning to one degree or another.
  11. -1
    23 August 2019 17: 07
    . At the same time, the Iranian president said that the Bavar-373 is superior to the S-300

    Listen to them, so each of their analogs and complex surpasses ours. Only due to what? Lagging countries can only copy; they do not have their own school. They did not go a long technological path.
  12. 0
    23 August 2019 17: 53
    It is not clear what such confidence is based on. I would like to take a look at this air defense system in action, but it will be seen there.
  13. -1
    23 August 2019 23: 45
    Quote: gregor6549
    It is difficult to judge by what is Iranian in this complex and what is copied from someone.
    In my unenlightened opinion, it seems that the radar has an active phased antenna array (AFAR), in contrast to the passive phased (AFAR) used in C300PMU. Further, the principle of launching and managing missiles in the initial part of the trajectory also differs from that used in C300. Well, the size of the TPK make it possible to doubt that the missiles of this complex have the same performance characteristics as those of the C300 missiles.
    Everything else is already a question of the energy consumption of the SAM fuel, the computing power of the digital computer, algorithms for processing radar information and control of the air defense missile system, and much more, which is still a thing in itself because it is unknown. In addition, it must be remembered that the Iranians have repeatedly demonstrated a "cardboard fool" instead of real "hardware". But misinformation is not only their methods. All of them sinned and are sinning to one degree or another.

    Definitely AFAR, but it is believed that in this case it is not a fact, which is good.
    The laws of control at the launch site are a consequence of the launch method (hot start) and the rocket control method.
    The product most likely makes its functional more or less satisfactory, there are some details that the Persians have "niche", but basically, it seems that they mastered the most necessary things.
  14. -1
    23 August 2019 23: 47
    Quote: V1er
    . At the same time, the Iranian president said that the Bavar-373 is superior to the S-300

    Listen to them, so each of their analogs and complex surpasses ours. Only due to what? Lagging countries can only copy; they do not have their own school. They did not go a long technological path.

    For example, they can surpass the quantity by quantity, for the price of one of their three hundred pieces ten will do
  15. -1
    23 August 2019 23: 48
    Quote: TermNachTER
    It is not clear what such confidence is based on. I would like to take a look at this air defense system in action, but it will be seen there.

    Yes globalhawks fel enough eyes

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"