China appreciates Iranian "analogue C-300" with a new version of anti-aircraft missiles

The Chinese press appreciated the updated Bavar-373 anti-aircraft missile system presented by Iran at the arms exhibition. The official presentation of the “fresh” version of the Iranian air defense system will take place from August 22 (Iran’s defense industry day), but the first frames with an exhibition version are already on the network.

The demonstration is held in the Iranian city of Isfahan.

Chinese reporters note that the Bavar-373 is an Iranian version of the Russian S-300 air defense system. It is added that the Iranians began to develop the complex in connection with weapons embargo imposed in 2010 on the basis of a UN Security Council resolution. Then, as you know, Russia supported the anti-Iranian resolution, which led to a very scandalous situation under the contract for the supply of S-300. Over time, the Russian Federation still delivered.

The Iranian system for detecting targets uses a proprietary MeRaj-4 radar with AFAR.

Chinese reporters praised the Sayyad-4 anti-aircraft missile, which is used on the Bavar-373. We are talking about a modernized version of the rocket, which, as noted, has a wider range of capabilities for hitting air targets than the predecessor version.

According to Chinese media reports, the Bavar-373, an “analogue of the C-300,” continues to use the French arms intelligence system, which appeared in Iran several years ago. In France, which supports the arms embargo against Iran, these reports are not commented on.

The air defense launcher is located on the Zayjanah chassis (versions 8x8 and 10x10), which has a high cross-country ability. The Bavar-373 can work on four or six targets at once, while allegedly it still does not have the function of destroying tactical ballistic missiles.

It is noted that the Iranians did not hesitate (and the Chinese themselves are shy?) To use foreign technologies and components to create their own anti-aircraft missile system.

Comments

[Chaldon48]

What can I say here, everyone takes advantage of what they have.

[Nevsky_ZU]

I "like" so much when abroad, be it the Chinese, Iranians or anyone else, compare their developments with the S-300, like they surpassed the Russians. As if there are no modifications of these S-300 complexes from Russia ..., and immediately after them comes the S-400. They say it was 5 minutes before they caught up with Russia at the air defense school.

[Chaldon48]

China in terms of copying ahead of the rest.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Nevsky_ZU

I "like" so much when abroad, be it the Chinese, Iranians or anyone else, compare their developments with the S-300

The point is not that they have surpassed or not, but in the markets. Moreover, with the advent and saturation of such systems, the armed forces of third countries gives the latter the opportunity to not so much fear the Washington democratizers.

[Alexey-74]

Well, the quality of the air defense system can be estimated really in combat conditions, and so all the performance characteristics and so on - advertising bragging. If our S-300 and S-400 trolls, then what about their systems ......

[MoJloT]

Tests at the Israeli Air Force when?

[Romario_Argo]

Bavar-373 can work on four or six goals at once

with a stretch I suppose that it is up to 6 channels of the control center with guidance of 6 missiles to 6 targets

Sayyad-4 anti-aircraft missile

Sayyad-4 missiles have a range of 250 km., And a semi-active missile warhead, similar to the 48Н6 missiles also 250 km., With a semi-active missile warhead, but with radio correction on the path

uses a MeRaj-4 proprietary radar with AFAR

Meraj-4 radar: this is 3000 hours of failure, 6 channels of the control unit
RPN radar 30Н6Е1 air defense missile systems S-300PMU-1: 6 channels TsU, 10 000 hours of failure
* Iran has managed to create an air defense system comparable in its characteristics with S-300PMU-1, this is 1993 year,

[g1washntwn]

It can and can be compared to a missile (I do not have information), but the complex itself is more likely with the Patriot. PU inclined, radars - also for work in the sector. Where is the foreshortening?

[Kosh]

PU there is just a vertical launch, there the Iranians showed video and footage from the tests

[Kosh]

On the screen in the article, the launcher is shown at the moment when it was lowering or rising, in a combat position it is vertically installed

[g1washntwn]

OK. What's with the radar? Is able to turn around in the sphere?

[afrikanez]

Well, just not the Chinese who are to blame for borrowing technology. Themselves are the world's "copier", and there too.

[Angelica]

Quote: Chaldon48

China in terms of copying ahead of the rest.

The Japanese at one time followed the same path. And now they don’t disdain. The most recent high-profile example is Japanese hybrid cars. https://news.drom.ru/11569.html

[Old26]

Quote: MoJloT

Tests at the Israeli Air Force when?

It was already. This complex was at the T-4 base in Syria. Just not a single missile was fired at Israeli targets. And the Israelis covered the base. So this unmatched and superior S-300 complex "proved" to be

[Kosh]

It was not, this complex generally only recently completed tests in Iran. As for the T-4 base, there even according to what the Israeli and American media wrote, they believed that last year they tried to deliver one Tor-M1 air defense missile system there but did not even manage to put it on combat duty. Israel struck immediately after unloading.

[Sky strike fighter]

According to Chinese media reports, the Bavar-373, an “analogue of the C-300,” continues to use the French arms intelligence system, which appeared in Iran several years ago. In France, which supports the arms embargo against Iran, these reports are not commented on.

Weak spot. The French during the Falkland War gave the British the keys to their Exocet anti-ship missiles at the request of the latter. And we must remember that the French air defense systems did not work at the right time during the Iraq war.

[Grigory_45]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

The French during the Falkland War gave the British the keys to their RCC Exocet at the request of the latter

And what really helped? Perhaps that is why the Exosets drowned the Atlantic Conveyor, Sheffield and damaged the destroyer Glamorgan (with the last missile)

Everything is much simpler. The British had hysteria. British air defense has shown itself to be completely unsatisfactory. The British air defense systems did not meet the requirements of combating low-flying cruise missiles, there were no small-caliber automatic anti-aircraft artillery on ships, and there were no AWACS.

You retype network ravings again due to a lack of basic knowledge and thinking skills.

[Old26]

Quote: Kosh

It was not, this complex generally only recently completed tests in Iran. As for the T-4 base, there even according to what the Israeli and American media wrote, they believed that last year they tried to deliver one Tor-M1 air defense missile system there but did not even manage to put it on combat duty. Israel struck immediately after unloading.

I read it on our resources, but I will not argue. It is possible that we are talking about the Torah.