Anacopian battle. Under the cover of legends and myths

15
If you climb the tower of the Anakopia fortress, which rises on the Iverskaya (Anakopia, Apsarskaya) mountain, then New Athos spreads before your eyes in full view. In the north, the mountain ranges of the Caucasus, covered by a continuous blanket of the Caucasian forests, stretch to the horizon, and in the south, where the eye can see, the Black Sea stretches. Now, of course, there is little evidence that these ruins were once a powerful fortification, erected in an unusually successful place - at an altitude of 344 meters, to which at one time there was only one single path no more than two meters wide. It is not in vain that the doctor of philological sciences Khukhut Bgazhba and the historian Georgy Amichba believe that the word Anacopia from the Abkhaz language of that time can be translated as “rugged”, “dissected by steepness”, “ledge”. It was here in the 736-737 years that a battle broke out, which included history like Anacopian (or the battle at the walls of Anacopia).


Anacopian Fortress




Arab expansion in the Caucasus


The Umayyad caliphate, which began active expansion in the second half of the 7 century, quickly subjugated a number of peoples. The Umayyad dynasties managed to capture North Africa, part of Central Asia, the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula, the southern and western Caspian lands, etc. And in the beginning of the 30-s of the 8-th century, the gaze of the Arab caliph Hisham ibn Abdul-Malik turned to the Caucasus.

Soon, Caliph Hisham appointed Marwan II ibn Muhammad (eventually becoming the last Umayyad caliph) ruler of the new Caucasian lands. And in order to pacify the local population, Marwan was given an army in 120-130 of thousands of soldiers. True, these figures cause very big doubts, because the caliphate at that time was at war with Byzantium, and rebellions and the struggle for power within the caliphate itself diverted a lot of forces.


Map of the Umayyad Caliphate for the 750 Year


One way or another, but Marwan became the governor of the caliph in the Caucasus in the 732 year. By the time of the battle near the walls of Anacopia, Marwan had already won the “fame” of a brutal commander who conducted a series of devastating raids from Georgia to the lands of modern Armenia. The Kartvels even called Marvan “deaf” (“deaf to suffering and supplications”), and the Armenians called him Marwan the Reaver. At the same time, several decades ago, the Georgian princes themselves invited the Arabs to their lands - only in alliance with them could the Kartvels resist Byzantium. Sometimes a tangle of political steps and “unions” is extremely painful for those who turned this tangle.

Finally, the Arab conquerors went through fire and sword through the eastern principalities of modern Georgia, and after that invaded the western and southern principalities. The Kartli mtavars (princes) Mihr (Mirian or Mir) and his brother Archil with a small army fled from the Arab invaders. At first they found shelter in Lazik (Lazistan, Egrisi, the Laz kingdom), but, pursued by Marwan, fled further to the lands of the Abazians - Abazgiya (modern Abkhazia).

Meanwhile, Marwan ravaged almost all the major cities and the fortifications of Lazica, which at that time was called the Principality of Egrisi. Even the walled city and the capital of the principality Tsihe-Goji (now called Nokalakevi) fell under the pressure of the frantic Marwan. Until now, on the site of the former capital Egrisi, the remains of the massive walls of an ancient fortress rise - all that remains of Ciehe-goji.

After the ruin of the southern Georgian principalities, Marwan rushed north to Abazgiya, having a formal reason to punish the Abazgs for harboring the enemies of the caliphate.

Enemy on the Doorstep


At that moment, Prince Leon I ruled Abazgia, and Anacopia was the capital of the principality with a powerful citadel on the top of the Iverskaya Mountain. At the same time, the Kartli princes, whom Georgian historians refer to as kings, managed to establish contact with Leon in advance and agree on alliance against the common enemy - the Arabs. Perhaps this union would not exist at all if it were not for the bloodthirstiness and vengeance of Marwan. For example, Marwan ordered the Argve princes to be brutally tortured, later they were hanged upside down, carefully tied, and after that they hung heavy stones around his neck and threw them into the Rioni River.



Naturally, Mihr and Archil rushed precisely to Anacopia. Only there they could count on some chance to jointly fight off Marwan’s troops. There is no exact information about the army of the Kartli princes. Some sources claim that Mihr and Archil had only a detachment of a thousand fighters, consisting of princely squads and people from their eristavs (a title equal to the title of a duke or Greco-Roman strategist). According to other sources, the army of runaway rulers reached three thousand soldiers, which was possible, because from the ravaged southern Georgian principalities, the population rushed north.

The Abazg army at the Anakopia fortress numbered about two thousand soldiers. At the same time, Prince Leon himself was not in the fortress at that moment. At that moment, he was in a certain Sobgi fortress, located on a mountain pass on the way to Ossetia. According to historians, the prince tried to conclude an allied treaty with the Alans in order to together try to repulse the ongoing Arab invasion. Marwan’s army numbered from 20 to 40 of thousands of soldiers.

Almost all information about that battle is described by only three authors. Moreover, one of them is nameless, only his work is known - “Martyrdom of David and Constantine”. Two other authors are Leonti Mroveli, who wrote “The Martyrdom of Archil” in the 11 century, and Juansher Juansheriani, who also wrote the 11 century, “The Life of Vakhtang Gorgasal”. Alas, this state of affairs creates a lot of confusion - often the authors contradict each other. In addition, the narrative itself is very specific and Christian religiously, having many references to the conduct and heavenly patronage of the host.



The latter can be explained by the fact that at that time the Caucasus was still largely a Christian region. And whatever political contradictions stood between the Kartli, Laz or Abazg princes, they were all Christians opposed to Muslims. The naming of the Arabs in one of the works - “pagans” also speaks of the degree of purely religious hostility towards the invaders.

The battle at the walls of Anacopia


The most fully and in detail the battle and its results were described by Juancher Juancheriani. It was on the basis of his work that many historians reconstructed the battle at the walls of Anacopia. So, Juanscher wrote:

“And they appeared (Mihr and Archil) before that holy icon of the Most Holy Mother of God, praying to her, bowing ... And before dawn, the Lord God sent southern heat to Saracen, and they fell ill with blood cholera. That night, a divine angel appeared to Archil, who told him: “Go and fight with the Ogaryans (“ Hagar ”, the name of the Arabs, which came from the name of Abraham’s concubine, the girl Hagar, who gave birth to his son Ishmael, but who was expelled and founded the first branches of the Arab tribes - approx. auth.), for I sent a cruel and exterminating disease of people and animals ”.


Anacopian battle. Under the cover of legends and myths

The fresco "Battle of Anacopia". Author - Valery Gamgia


Behind the specifics of the presentation is the fact that foreign troops in this area often suffered from climate, heavy rains and heavy roads. Therefore, it is likely that the majority of Arabs, accustomed to a diametrically different terrain and climate, were infected with the terrain's characteristic diseases. An epidemic in an adversary’s camp is always a gift for the defenders. Thus, even before the start of the battle, the Arabs were mowed down by the “subtropics general,” so to speak.

The battle itself, according to Juansher Juansheriani, began at dawn, when Mihr and Archil, together with the combined forces of the Abazgs and Kartvel, came out towards the Arabs. The demoralized forces of the Arabs lost that battle. According to Juansheriani, up to 35 of thousands of soldiers fell from disease, and three thousand lost their lives from the sword. The survivors fled from these lands, led by Marwan.



Thus, the following factors influenced the outcome of the battle: the rallying of the Kartvels and Abazs in the face of a common enemy, the religious nature of the war, the bloodthirstiness of Marwan himself, the shortsightedness of the Arab commanders in relation to the specific terrain they were going to conquer. And also we should not forget the importance of Anakopia fortress. For example, according to the anonymous author of “The Martyrdom of David and Constantine,” the Arabs won the battle, but they smashed their strength against the walls of the fortress and retreated.

The heart of Anacopia is a powerful citadel on the top of the Iverskaya Mountain (height -344 meters above sea level). In length, the Anakopian citadel reaches 83 m, and in width - 37 m. The height of the walls reached five meters, and the thickness in some places exceeded a meter. Walls were erected from tightly fitted limestone blocks about 60 cm long and wide. There are several buildings inside the citadel, including cult ones, as well as a deep well with enough water for the siege (it is in working condition).



In addition, some time before the Anacopian battle, the fortress was surrounded by another line of defense, distant from the citadel. This line consisted of eastern, southern and western fortress walls, the most powerful of which was the southern wall, reinforced by seven towers. Thus, Anacopia, as a whole defensive complex, in itself was able to make the enemy think about the feasibility of a siege in a hostile territory and climate. As a result, one way or another, but the Arabs retreated, leaving Abazgiya and Egrisi and suffered a political defeat, reflected in the rise of the Abazgs and Kartvels, whose union, however, did not last long.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    24 August 2019 06: 17
    The Kartli mtavars (princes) Mihr (Mirian or Mir) and his brother Archil with a small army fled from the Arab invaders.
    "Timid Georgians were running ..."
    Who will seriously study this battle now in order to dispel all the myths and strengthen the legend? Georgia? This is definitely not necessary. Abkhazia? Does she have opportunities for this? So that for a long time this battle will refer to "legends and myths".
    Thanks to the author for trying to open this page of history to the best of his ability.
    1. +1
      24 August 2019 22: 22
      Firstly, thanks to the Author for another interesting material. And I will answer the comment above, there are historians and there is an interest in historical science. And if you call me a city in Russia with a population of 50-60 thousand people in which there are 2 theaters, a philharmonic society, 2 universities, 2 art galleries, 16 schools, a museum, television ... then I admit that the Abkhazians are savages. And by the way, on the street you won’t hear a mat and you won’t see a drunk man, by the way. As for the Anokopian battle itself, the main version of the defeat of the Arabs is dysentery. Since traditionally the Abkhaz were fortified in inaccessible places, and the forager units were destroyed from ambushes. On this subject there is an interesting book "at the walls of Anokopiya."
      Sincerely.
    2. -1
      25 August 2019 21: 54
      Yes, so timid that all the same, along with the Abkhazians heaped on the Arabs. laughing
  2. +2
    24 August 2019 09: 06
    Yes, indeed, under the cover of myths and legends.
    Levi-Bul defined thinking, which, among other things, does not believe in scientific facts, but believes only in myths and legends, he defined it as "prelogical".
    In Transcaucasia and the North Caucasus, of course, this type is present very strongly: my grandfathers told me that his grandfather told me that at the time of his grandfather one respected person told.
    And most importantly, they all believe these tales)
    Thanks to the author!
    1. 0
      24 August 2019 22: 26
      Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
      In Transcaucasia and the North Caucasus, of course, this type is present very strongly: my grandfathers told me that his grandfather told me that at the time of his grandfather one respected person told.
      And most importantly, they all believe these tales)

      That's interesting.
      I don’t know how about the Caucasus, I don’t know my ancestors there. But I remember my two great-grandmothers well. One born in 1897 second 1902. The first from the Tambov region, the second from Vinnitsa. I remember their stories about 20-30 years of the 20th century. I was 10-15 years old when I listened to them, they are around 90.
      When now my children sometimes listen to the repetition of their stories with my mouth, then my parents correct me in some places, who caught these great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers, and even listened to their farthest rights. So my parents and grandfathers and grandmothers listened to these stories more than once and not two, and not only from them alone.
      I don't know how long I will live, but the family is large, and there are always groups of a couple of people at the table who remember "differently". Most often in the little things in different ways.
      Total "living" memory at the table, with a story from the second person at most, it will be 150 years ago. Not so few.
      Maybe grandfathers and great-grandmothers should at least believe in something. Fortunately there is nothing to compare.
      1. 0
        25 August 2019 16: 44
        This question is not about faith or disbelief in family affiliation, but the question of the transfer of information in societies with pralogic thinking, the information of which is characterized by a number of distortions, not special, but caused by the development of thinking at this stage.
        The Caucasian society cited, since the events described in the article took place in the Caucasus, but on the whole, oddly enough, the same Abkhaz ethnic group, having some statehood at the beginning of our era, as the society remained at the state level.
        Best regards,
        Edward
        1. +1
          25 August 2019 21: 59
          [quote = Eduard Vaschenko] This question is not about faith or disbelief in family attachments, but about the transfer of information in societies with pralogical thinking, information of which is characterized by a number of distortions, not special, but caused by the development of thinking at this stage [/ quote]
          You are right here.
          Once, one living person said something approximate: "... It is natural for a Russian person to live according to the laws of historical (traditional) justice. At first, a Russian person does not respect his boss ...".
          I can add my opinion that the word "Russian", I would change to the word "Slavic", or rather Slavonic. Although there are certainly other European cultures with an extreme degree of development of popular liberalism (where freedom is equal to responsibility to society), for example, native France, Spain.
          The justice and truthfulness of the transmission of information is the key to freedom.
          Sincerely.
          1. 0
            26 August 2019 14: 18
            "... It is natural for a Russian person to live according to the laws of historical (traditional) justice. At first, a Russian person does not respect his boss ..."

            Each nation has its positive and negative traits, every sandpiper praises its swamp: and I, including this, see nothing wrong with us.
            Maybe we are not like that - but our "bosses" are not right?

            But, "good" or "bad" is not quite a scientific term,
            but nations standing at a certain stage of development and correspondingly having a certain system of values ​​- this lends itself to scientific analysis.
            Best regards
            1. 0
              28 August 2019 21: 03
              Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
              Each nation has its positive and negative traits, every sandpiper praises its swamp: and I, including this, see nothing wrong with us.
              Maybe we are not like that - but our "bosses" are not right?

              I don’t see either.
              Given the ancient traditions of feeding and localism, which turned into the ability to buy titles and positions without the presence of talent and experience.
              Maybe this is reinsurance, when you meet anyone you don’t know without trust (at least indifferent, at most as the enemy), but life taught us this, and not us. We only nourish this tradition with the constancy of examples))
              And probably not in vain in the "liberal" Eastern Europe, the legitimacy of my doctor's diploma, obtained according to the standards of the USSR, is required to be proved with triple reinsurance. We taught them this. And in the most painful way. Initially teaching them "life", and being their teachers, in fact, were unable to do their "homework" (this is within the living generation, and not the history of things long gone. It is not clear who started first.)

              By the way, here is an interesting gradation of value systems by countries / peoples, cultures or something. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Inglehart_Values_Map.svg/300px-Inglehart_Values_Map.svg.png
              https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Inglehart_Values_Map.svg/301px-Inglehart_Values_Map.svg.png
              And this with a change in time https://youtu.be/ABWYOcru7js?t=2
              I do not quite agree with this scheme, it is painfully radical and generalizing. At what I do not see any admirers of the Kaaba there. But what bribes her is the current confrontation between the points indicated in the upper left corner of the table.
              Moreover, with what ease these "points" begin to react among themselves - to survive! Natural chemistry with its exothermic reaction, heterogeneous combustion, which periodically passes from the laminar phase to the turbulent (c)) - And exactly opposite at the top are countries with an endothermic reaction. If the whole system is in equilibrium, then where do the endotherms get their energy from ??
              The most interesting in the center.
              1. 0
                28 August 2019 21: 24
                How interesting you are all turned.
                Interesting!
                PS alas, about the diploma box just opened. Politics and the protection of their jobs.
                Best regards,
                Edward hi
  3. +1
    24 August 2019 10: 48
    I’ve been under the walls of this fortress, but in most I didn’t. She makes a serious impression, so maybe the Arabs could have broken her teeth.
  4. +1
    24 August 2019 10: 52
    The Arabs became extinct from the epidemic, the remaining were weak and discouraged by the disease. The Arabs themselves left, because there were no forces left to keep the territory.
  5. -1
    24 August 2019 18: 01
    most likely there was a long siege during which the Arabs began to have illnesses in the camp and they were forced to retreat, maybe the combined army broke the rearguard left by the Arabs to cover the departure of the main army with the sick and weakened, but this is more my guess
    1. 0
      28 October 2019 13: 32
      most likely there was a long siege during which the Arabs began in the camp of the disease

      The fact that Ch. respected Klim Zhukov calls "combat diarrhea" laughing
  6. 0
    25 August 2019 21: 59
    Surprisingly worthy material from the East Wind, without typical in the past small-sized anti-Georgian elements. I would advise the author to write a little more informative who these Kartlis and Egris are (Eastern and Western Georgians), who were the authors who left us a compilation and chronicles of those events (in this case, Georgian chroniclers). All the same, to a reader unfamiliar with the history of the Caucasus, all these ethnonyms and names of chroniclers at first sight do not say anything