Military Review

Russia after Putin - writer's thoughts

36
The change of power in our country has features. Usually (and so it was for decades, not centuries), a new head of state is also a cardinal change of course. Often - with attempts exposures or exposures of the previous head.


Russia after Putin - writer's thoughts


This trend has a significant negative effect on the development of the country. Even during the existence of the dynastic monarchy in our country there were no guarantees that with the advent of the new autocrat, the political course (both external and internal) would be maintained.
Continuity usually remained such solely on paper, and the main role was played by undercover games, palace intrigues and so on.

This leapfrog repeatedly threw Russia back.

In this regard, experts are discussing the question of what kind of Russia will be after the presidency of Vladimir Putin. If the country steps on again historical rake with a complete revision of the built course, then opponents will have a new chance to push Russia to geopolitical backyard.

The opinion of the writer Yuri Polyakov, who became guests of the broadcast of one of the programs on the Day channel, is interesting in this regard.

Polyakov says that he “feels the clusters of anger growing” in Russian society. And at the same time, the writer makes a judgment that in modern Russia there is no political alternative.

Poles:

If a question arises: let's change the elite. But on who?

The writer ponders what will happen in Russia with the departure of Putin.

36 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Greenwood
    Greenwood 19 August 2019 05: 03
    +4
    the new head of state is also a cardinal change of course. Often - with attempts to expose or expose the previous leader.
    The trouble of Russia. Unlike the United States, where any president is forced to adapt to the system, our policy is actually formed by the head of state, often with very disastrous results.
    In this regard, experts are discussing the question of what kind of Russia will be after the presidency of Vladimir Putin.
    Either a normal socially oriented opposition will come to power, or one of the people from Putin’s circle will be appointed (and this is a problem, because there are mountains of dirt on all of his people, almost no one is clean).
    1. eagle owl
      eagle owl 19 August 2019 05: 27
      +1
      And in the USA, unemployed balabol form a policy. In fact, the class that created America, the same Yankees, is pushed back from politics, and politics is determined by migrants who have been sitting on the welfare for generations and have not worked for a day, now their candidates are fighting for their votes. and precisely in this is the collapse of the US political system.
      By the way, it has changed so fuckingly in the recent past, open your eyes, it was in the 90s that America began to bend down in a funny pose the boomerang they launched from the consumer society and unfounded populism, launched by them to destroy social stability, is not in the social camp now, namely in the USA they are being fooled by fairy tales about the ban on air transportation and livestock farms for landscaping America. And the minister in the Senate is seriously asked - and if you print an unlimited number of dollars, then nothing bad will happen? They did not hear about inflation, yeah.
      And are you trying to compare this Ocacio-Cortes comrade with Reagan and Nixon? Nothing has changed, tuned to the system? What a fierce lie!
      1. Greenwood
        Greenwood 19 August 2019 05: 43
        +4
        Quote: Uhu
        the collapse of the US political system
        Oh, just, without this mantra, let's talk about the political, economic and other collapses of the United States. Boring and uninteresting.
        Quote: Uhu
        it was in the 90s that America began to bend into a funny pose that the boomerang from the consumer society and unfounded populism launched by them to destroy social welfare
        So how, bent over? What has changed fundamentally in 30 years ?!
        1. eagle owl
          eagle owl 19 August 2019 06: 28
          -3
          https://www.infox.ru/news/285/world/politics/215444-kongressmen-iz-ssa-obvinila-muzcin-v-globalnom-poteplenii
          That's what. This is Kashchenko on the walk
          1. Greenwood
            Greenwood 19 August 2019 07: 04
            +7
            With the same success, one can draw conclusions about the political system of Russia according to the chatter of Zhirinovsky.
      2. ssergey1978
        ssergey1978 19 August 2019 06: 02
        +1
        The collapse of the political system! And you are funny.
        1. eagle owl
          eagle owl 19 August 2019 06: 31
          -3
          Yeah, all of America laughed, watching Trump and Congress sabotage each other's actions, which is why China unimpededly pushed the United States into the background, and they all continue to fight each other, but there’s no political crisis that you are!
          1. Greenwood
            Greenwood 19 August 2019 07: 05
            +3
            Quote: Uhu
            looking at trump with Congress sabotaging each other's actions
            Yes Yes. Better as in Russia: the pocket Duma, the pocket Federation Council, the opposition and that pocket.
            1. eagle owl
              eagle owl 19 August 2019 09: 17
              -1
              You are so nifig in the subject do not cut that it is stupid to argue with you. Throughout the world, the government forms the majority of the elected parliament. That is, whoever won is the government. That is, the Duma ... Parliament or the Senate - all over the world pocket.
              Probably hard to argue on topics in which neither the ear nor the snout?
              And yet, there are presidential republics, there are parliamentary ones. In the latter, the president is a clown. Do you even know that the president of Germany is not Merkel? wassat
              Further, in the same USA is even more fun. Over the past 300 years, immigrants from one of 5 families have become presidents; there is generally a caste system. By the way. Obama too - not a Kenyan farmer from the street - among relatives - Bushes., Truman, Gerald Ford, why the aircraft carrier was so named, Lyndon Johnson and James Madison, there is a caste system in general, it’s not even pocket-sized, but much more fun, a closed caste, like in England.
              However, it's not about that.
              The point is that there is a full-fledged war, so far without a firearm, but already with the special services, at the top of politics. An example - all the investigators and witnesses in the case of the violation of Clinton's secrecy - suddenly died in six months B- = CE. This is not a fake Skripal for you, this is a special services war
              1. Greenwood
                Greenwood 19 August 2019 16: 19
                -1
                Quote: Uhu
                You are so nifig in the subject do not chop
                But where am I to a true political expert, registered 3 days ago to promote the truth-womb to the masses.
                Quote: Uhu
                Probably hard to argue on topics in which neither the ear nor the snout?
                Do you have a degree in political science, experience in a government institution? Or one more couch "expert" who imagines himself to be such.
                Quote: Uhu
                Do you even know that the president of Germany is not Merkel?
                YES what are you saying ?! Do you know that Merkel is not a man? lol
                Quote: Uhu
                Further, in the same USA is even more fun. Over the past 300 years, immigrants from one of 5 families have become presidents; there is generally a caste system. By the way. Obama too - not a Kenyan farmer from the street - among relatives - Bushes., Truman, Gerald Ford, why the aircraft carrier was so named, Lyndon Johnson and James Madison, there is a caste system in general, it’s not even pocket-sized, but much more fun, a closed caste, like in England.
                Mindflow.
                Quote: Uhu
                The point is that there is a full-fledged war, so far without a firearm, but already with the special services, at the top of politics. An example - all the investigators and witnesses in the case of the violation of Clinton's secrecy - suddenly died in six months B- = CE. This is not a fake Skripal for you, this is a special services war
                You need to work on Ren-TV or NTV. Ideal for conspiracy theorists, paranoid and political "experts" from the couch.
      3. Gardamir
        Gardamir 19 August 2019 08: 07
        +3
        And in the USA
        Why are you so praying in the USA? From this began the destruction of the Union - Great Russia!
    2. Same lech
      Same lech 19 August 2019 05: 27
      +2
      All of these sores in Russia have long been known ... but it is extremely difficult to treat them, since they have eaten into our blood and flesh to the bones and surgically cut them, oh, how painful.
      So I don’t know ... what will the doctor prescribe for a headache ... a pill or a guillotine? what
    3. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 19 August 2019 06: 27
      0
      what kind of opposition? who is it that hesitate to ask)))
      1. Greenwood
        Greenwood 19 August 2019 07: 06
        +5
        Quote: carstorm 11
        who is it that hesitate to ask)))
        Like who? Bulk, Sable, that's all. Choked.
        1. shura7782
          shura7782 19 August 2019 11: 56
          0
          Quote: Greenwood
          Quote: carstorm 11
          who is it that hesitate to ask)))
          Like who? Bulk, Sable, that's all. Choked.

          Amazing Do you seriously think so !? This is serious for you. opposition , for which people rush to vote without looking back, if only not for GDP?
          1. Svarog
            Svarog 19 August 2019 13: 15
            +1
            Quote: shura7782
            Amazing Do you seriously think so !? Is this a serious opposition for you, for which people will rush to vote without regard, if only not for GDP?

            Serious opposition can only be socialist ideas .. all the others are the same side view.
            One does not have to expect constructive changes from Navalny; he will come to power and form the same organized crime group as now. The only ones who can give serious positive changes are the socialists ..
            1. shura7782
              shura7782 19 August 2019 13: 49
              +1
              Vladimir, now you have the same question.
              Quote: Svarog
              .... will come to power, ......

              Do you take this threat seriously? In my understanding, he himself will not come to power and will not push his own. Hope other names come up. These will be chosen from them.
              1. Svarog
                Svarog 19 August 2019 13: 52
                0
                Quote: shura7782
                Do you take this threat seriously? In my understanding, he himself will not come to power and will not push his own. Hope other names come up. These will be chosen from them.

                No, of course, there is no such threat.
                Quote: shura7782
                Hope other names come up. These will be chosen from them.

                There are names .. but the system does not give them a chance, that’s the problem. Grudinin, Platoshkin, Shevchenko are worthy candidates, but you won’t see them on TV ..
            2. shura7782
              shura7782 19 August 2019 15: 46
              +1
              Quote: Svarog
              The only ones who can give serious positive changes are the socialists ..

              The confrontation between socialists and conservatives gives a positive effect. Socialists are not yet ripe and edros are not conservatives.
              1. Svarog
                Svarog 19 August 2019 16: 00
                -1
                Quote: shura7782
                Socialists are not ripe

                To check maturity, you need to give an opportunity .. and they are not even allowed on TV ..
                Quote: shura7782
                edros are not conservatives.

                United Russia is an opportunist, among whom almost all crooks .. not a party, but a bunch of business interests ..
                1. shura7782
                  shura7782 19 August 2019 17: 09
                  +1
                  ..... and they are not even allowed on TV ......

                  All true.
          2. Greenwood
            Greenwood 19 August 2019 16: 22
            +1
            Quote: shura7782
            Do you seriously think so !? Is this a serious opposition for you, for which people will rush to vote without regard, if only not for GDP?
            Seriously nowhere. lol Lesha is our everything !!!
            1. shura7782
              shura7782 19 August 2019 17: 31
              +1
              Quote: Greenwood
              Lesha is our everything !!!

              laughing good
        2. Greg Miller
          Greg Miller 19 August 2019 18: 55
          +1
          Quote: Greenwood
          Quote: carstorm 11
          who is it that hesitate to ask)))
          Like who? Bulk, Sable, that's all. Choked.

          And what is so special about Navalny and Sobol differing from United Russia? Will Kudrin, Chubais or the oligarchs be sad with them? No, it won't, everything will be the same as it was under Putin ...
          1. shura7782
            shura7782 21 August 2019 21: 26
            +1
            Quote: Greg Miller
            ... like under Putin ...

            It turns out that way.
    4. Old Michael
      Old Michael 19 August 2019 08: 10
      0
      The trouble of Russia

      The trouble of Russia is the Polyakovs.
      Having served a term as a clerk at the headquarters of the construction battalion, this person believes that he has learned the essence of the army, and writes "One hundred days before the order." Having worked snarling in the district committee of the Komsomol, he gives birth to the next "incorruptible" - "state of emergency of the regional scale", pouring like shit on everyone he could remember.
      Written, undoubtedly, talented. But for some reason, besides this very shit, Polyakov did not take out anything good either from the army or from the Komsomol. And so he went on slamming through life, with a sweetheart.
      1. Old Michael
        Old Michael 19 August 2019 09: 24
        +5
        Citizens minusers!
        Explain, in just one word, how have I offended you?
        PS Polyakov, of course, "drew the readers' attention to the pain points of our society." But he tasted all the original nishtyaks at these points. And his literary device is a logical diversion known as "unreasonable generalization". So, for example, my son, being three years old, saw a man with an awesome red beard and asked: "Why do all redheads wear a beard?"
  2. Far B
    Far B 19 August 2019 05: 37
    +2
    If the country again steps on a historical rake with a complete revision of the built course, then the opponents will have a new chance to push Russia to geopolitical margins.
    If a question arises: let's change the elite. But on who?

    All the same mantras. And who knew Putin in 1999?
    If the direction of movement is chosen incorrectly, then it is more useful to go back a little to correct the course, and not to drill forward, because in the end this very "forward" can be much more ... um ... behind.
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 19 August 2019 05: 48
      -1
      Quote: Dalny V
      And who knew Putin in 1999?
      There is such a moment. In 1999, the population did not have the Internet and free access to information. Putin was indeed a dark horse back then, and few people knew his past. Now it will hardly be possible to find a person about whom a detailed biography will not be painted on the Internet. Plus, if someone is found, at once the entire "democratic" community, opposition, the blogosphere and journalism will go through every day in the life of such a candidate and almost get into his cowards. Navalny will immediately release a detailed investigation. In 99, there were no such opportunities. It is hard to say whether Putin would have achieved such success now if he had been appointed as his successor.
      1. Far B
        Far B 19 August 2019 06: 13
        +7
        in the 99th, the Internet was already there, but not so publicly available))))
        In general, in the same 99, the press and television were much freer than today, so you can publish all sorts of revelations and then you can completely calmly. It was just that Putin's candidacy at that time suited the majority - both "owners of factories, newspapers, steamers", and a common man in the street, to whom the Yeltsin decade stuck in their livers. At the same time, the same man in the street "voted with his heart" in 96, re-electing EBN (and bringing himself the default-98), and, most likely, if Yeltsin had not resigned, he would have re-elected him in 2000 as well. Because the influence of "official propaganda" has not been canceled. Only one newspaper "God forbid!" remembering which it was disgusting to take in hands. But she did her job - instilled in people that if the commies returned to power, they would immediately unleash the red terror, the revolution would bang, and "Russia will not survive the new revolution" (although the entire Yeltsin decade is one continuous sluggish civil war). The notorious Boris Dyachenko in Vladik was in all seriousness going to dump over the hill in the event of Zyuganov's victory in the 96 elections. So in the old days, the media resource was enough to bring out the ins and outs of the candidates (not only were they leaking compromising evidence on the left. Remember the copier box - but they still voted for Yeltsin, because “it could be even worse in the future, so let it's better as it is now ").
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 19 August 2019 07: 08
          +4
          Quote: Dalny V
          in the 99th the Internet was already there, but not so public
          If only in Moscow. In the 99th, home computers were rare.
          Quote: Dalny V
          they still voted for Yeltsin, because "it could be even worse in the future, so let it be better as it is now."
          Now many, including visitors to this resource, vote for Putin exactly the same principle.
    2. Gardamir
      Gardamir 19 August 2019 08: 10
      0
      slightly back
      Yes, it doesn’t work out a bit ...
  3. Cats
    Cats 19 August 2019 10: 20
    0
    "With all the wealth of choice ..."
  4. Brigadier
    Brigadier 21 August 2019 16: 42
    0
    What Putin, what Yeltsin, what Gorbachev ... What's the difference? Apples from the apple tree ...
    All three of them did a lot to make the people "love" them greatly!
    I hope that after Putin, the Borko-centers will give for something more necessary.
  5. 1536
    1536 23 August 2019 13: 39
    0
    Many people remember Viktor Vasnetsov's painting "The Knight at the Crossroads". It was written in 1877, but it is still relevant today. “It is written on the stone:“ As a straight ehati - I never live - there is no way for a passer-by, or a passing person, or a passing one ”. The following inscriptions: “to the right ehati - to be married to being; on the left ehati - rich in being. "
    And in Russian fairy tales there are similar plots: "On the fork of paths and roads lies the Prophetic Stone, and on it the inscription:" You will go to the right - you will lose a horse, you will save yourself; if you go to the left, you will lose yourself, you will save a horse; if you go straight, you will lose yourself and your horse. ".
    If our people stop listening to the heralds of "Perestroika", dressed up today in various togas, and still in words "fighting" for "people's happiness", then everything will be fine. Unfortunately, gullibility and faith in the "intelligentsia", which behave treacherously in Russia at all times, can again play a cruel joke with the country and with the people. Let this "intelligentsia" think what to do, looking at the stone at the crossroads. It, alas, cannot be altered or overburned, it is what it is ... In spring and autumn it is especially dangerous (according to analyzes of 1917).
    The answer is simple, spit on this stone, look around and do not go anywhere, but start arranging the place where you stand, sit, live, etc. And whoever has a bad conscience or fees depend on what has been said, he must choose where to leave, go, turn off.
  6. Ukrainian socialist
    Ukrainian socialist 30 August 2019 12: 06
    +1
    It is necessary to cut socialism, and accordingly overthrow the old government. Moreover, our economy can function normally only with a planned-protectionist economy.