Military Review

The Ministry of Defense published an extended video of the flight of the UAV "Hunter"

61
The Russian Ministry of Defense has published an expanded video of the first flight of the Russian attack drone "Okhotnik", posting the video on the official channel of the military department on YouTube.


The Ministry of Defense published an extended video of the flight of the UAV "Hunter"


As previously Reported "Military Review", the first flight of the shock "Hunter" took place on August 3 at one of the airfields near Moscow. The drone made several circles over the airfield, during which the operation of the device was checked in different flight modes. At the same time, the entire flight passed with the landing gear released, which was done for safety reasons. After the completed maneuvers, the latest drone made a safe landing.

As it turned out, the drone’s flight was accompanied by the Su-30СМ fighter, which is also indicated by shots taken from the aircraft. Most likely, the hunter’s work in tandem with the plane, of course, was not worked out on the first flight, but it was previously stated that it was intended, including for working as a follower with a leading fighter. As an example, Su-57 was cited, from which C-70 took many technologies.

Unmanned aerial vehicle C-70 "Hunter" is made according to the "flying wing". Its construction uses special materials and coatings that repeatedly reduce the EPR, which makes it virtually invisible to enemy air defense systems. The take-off weight of the C-70 is about 20 tons. The UAV is designed for both reconnaissance and strike missions.

61 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. VO3A
    VO3A 16 August 2019 13: 23
    -36
    There is nothing yet, but we are already afraid of UAVs with this, we have already defeated everyone ..
    This is called a hybrid war .... Only against whom?
    They know that we know that they know what they think of us ....
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Civil
        Civil 16 August 2019 13: 35
        -4
        Quote: Svarog
        Quote: VO3A
        This is called a hybrid war .... Only against whom?

        The capitalists against the capitalists .. as usual, they want to squeeze a larger piece from each other ..

        Exactly, the meaning of this arms race without the struggle of ideologies.
        1. Valter1364
          Valter1364 16 August 2019 13: 40
          -2
          Everything is very simple. Bourgeois with bourgeois for the profits will always find a common language. At the expense of whom? Guess yourself. smile
          1. Shurik70
            Shurik70 16 August 2019 20: 18
            0
            In the video, the UAV takes off, flies calmly, lands. From the fact that the episode "quietly flies" was increased from 5 seconds of the previous video to 50 seconds, nothing new was shown.
            What is the meaning of "extended video"? what
            1. Ratmir_Ryazan
              Ratmir_Ryazan 17 August 2019 11: 05
              -1
              In that it is expanded and more than 10 times.
    2. g1washntwn
      g1washntwn 16 August 2019 13: 32
      +14
      Quote: VO3A
      They know that we know that they know that we .....

      ... we know why they were working on the possibility of using UAVs to deliver their nuclear weapons.
      The presence of similar weapons in the Russian Federation is able to direct the negotiation dialogs in a slightly different direction.
      1. Dietmar
        Dietmar 16 August 2019 17: 04
        +2
        The Americans jumped off the INF Treaty, now it is possible to test such a UAV, which clearly falls under the concept of an "intermediate and shorter-range missile."
    3. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 16 August 2019 13: 35
      -10
      Cool! And how a couple of years ago farts exploded in the VO - yes, this stealth is shit, and all the radars already see them, and the flying wing is not maneuverable at all, and we shot them down in dozens of Yugoslavia. But with the advent of su 57 and the hunter, somehow everyone shut up ...
      1. lucul
        lucul 16 August 2019 13: 40
        +4
        Cool! And how a couple of years ago farts exploded in the VO - yes, this stealth is shit, and all the radars already see them, and the flying wing is not maneuverable at all, and we shot them down in dozens of Yugoslavia. But with the advent of su 57 and the hunter, somehow everyone shut up ...

        So it is - for Russian radars these stealth technologies are visible, and for American and Israeli radars these stealth technologies are invisible.
        Are you daring? Or continue to chew?
        1. Vol4ara
          Vol4ara 16 August 2019 13: 46
          +7
          Quote: lucul
          Cool! And how a couple of years ago farts exploded in the VO - yes, this stealth is shit, and all the radars already see them, and the flying wing is not maneuverable at all, and we shot them down in dozens of Yugoslavia. But with the advent of su 57 and the hunter, somehow everyone shut up ...

          So it is - for Russian radars these stealth technologies are visible, and for American and Israeli radars these stealth technologies are invisible.
          Are you daring? Or continue to chew?

          That is, you truly believe that the creators of the first stealth aircraft were not concerned about their discovery? :) do you think that stealth aircraft may not be visible to radars? Are you seriously? :)
          1. RideMaster
            RideMaster 16 August 2019 13: 56
            +2
            He has a hat store, he’s used to throwing it.
            1. lucul
              lucul 16 August 2019 14: 18
              +5
              He has a hat store, he’s used to throwing it.

              Ahaha, I know for a long time what you have (Red Army ) Drove all stronger))
              1. RideMaster
                RideMaster 16 August 2019 14: 41
                +2
                I am Russian and live in Russia. I just don’t have a hat store.
                But I didn’t care at all, I don’t even know how they compare.
          2. lucul
            lucul 16 August 2019 14: 09
            -1
            That is, you truly believe that the creators of the first stealth aircraft were not concerned about their discovery? :) Are you seriously?

            Do you want to breed me into dialectics? )))
            Do you think that stealth aircraft may not be visible to radars?

            Aha-ahah this is already ......
            What was the purpose of creating a flying iron called a stealth plane? )))))
            1. Vol4ara
              Vol4ara 16 August 2019 14: 19
              +3
              Quote: lucul
              That is, you truly believe that the creators of the first stealth aircraft were not concerned about their discovery? :) Are you seriously?

              Do you want to breed me into dialectics? )))
              Do you think that stealth aircraft may not be visible to radars?

              Aha-ahah this is already ......
              What was the purpose of creating a flying iron called a stealth plane? )))))

              To reduce radar visibility, but not for invisibility at all, this can be possible theoretically, but certainly not now and certainly not for all angles - inconspicuous frontally, when training from behind it will glow like a Boeing. When a sniper wears a camouflage robe, he becomes less mobile and less noticeable, but not invisible at all, you should come closer to him and you will see him, or use more powerful binoculars if you know where to look
              1. lucul
                lucul 16 August 2019 14: 21
                0
                To reduce radar visibility, but not for invisibility at all, this can be possible theoretically, but certainly not now and certainly not for all angles - an inconspicuous front, when training from behind it will glow like a Boeing.

                Don’t worry so much - Russia is not going to attack Israel)))
                1. Vol4ara
                  Vol4ara 16 August 2019 14: 38
                  +1
                  Quote: lucul
                  To reduce radar visibility, but not for invisibility at all, this can be possible theoretically, but certainly not now and certainly not for all angles - an inconspicuous front, when training from behind it will glow like a Boeing.

                  Don’t worry so much - Russia is not going to attack Israel)))

                  Well, when Peter becomes part of Israel, I will sincerely worry about him ...
                  Drive the discus into demagogy
      2. SSR
        SSR 16 August 2019 13: 47
        +5
        Quote: Vol4ara
        Cool!

        + I hope that they will show at MAX.

        PS.
        After the accident with A-321, I immediately suggested that there might be a dump there?
        According to Rospotrebnadzor, they did find an illegal dump.
        How so ?!
      3. abc_alex
        abc_alex 16 August 2019 17: 28
        +3
        You do not understand. Reducing the radio visibility of the aircraft is a normal technical and technological process going on from the 50s of the 20th century. In fact, each new aircraft of the USA and the USSR was built with the requirement to reduce radio stealth.
        But stealth is it. It is a doctrine, a paradigm. After all, shtatovtsy put it not as a property of an aircraft, but as its BASIC parameter. Nighthawk could barely fly as it was made entirely for stealth. Spirit is generally not clear how and why to use it, since it is "stealth". Fighters of the "fifth generation" because of the "stealth" turned out to be wildly expensive, strangely capricious and "gentle" in service, and besides, they are also endowed with strangely contradictory parameters or "creatively meaningful" characteristics.
        They have "all around stealth", we have "all around and stealth".
      4. SOF
        SOF 17 August 2019 00: 17
        0
        Quote: Vol4ara
        somehow everyone shut up ...

        ... wow wow ...
        ... tell me, were you blowing up something there, here in the VO, proving to the community that the buzzer, which was fought by the fishermen because of its invisibility, is the crown of planetary shipbuilding? ....
        winked
        1. Vol4ara
          Vol4ara 17 August 2019 10: 05
          0
          Quote: SOF
          Quote: Vol4ara
          somehow everyone shut up ...

          ... wow wow ...
          ... tell me, were you blowing up something there, here in the VO, proving to the community that the buzzer, which was fought by the fishermen because of its invisibility, is the crown of planetary shipbuilding? ....
          winked


          No, the zomvolt is of little interest to me at all. And what does it have to do with it, they decided to write something in order to write something?
  2. RussianUzbek
    RussianUzbek 16 August 2019 13: 29
    +15
    A beautiful bird and as a stand for working out technologies is also good!
  3. Thrifty
    Thrifty 16 August 2019 13: 35
    +2
    It’s a pity that he’s not yet in service with the army!
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 16 August 2019 13: 37
      +6
      Well, quickly only cats breed.
    2. RideMaster
      RideMaster 16 August 2019 13: 58
      0
      Why is he? In a big war with reb and air defense, they will immediately be besieged and simply stop launching. Iran knocks down lightly. Nato, too, will lightly plant such as we drones. Airplanes are in the big war so far.
  4. Amateur
    Amateur 16 August 2019 13: 40
    -13
    And why on the front strut of the chassis headlight? She shines for whom?

    Omon Ra? wassat
    1. Dikson
      Dikson 16 August 2019 16: 43
      +11
      in fact, a headlight is, in addition to lighting, also a visual signal to an observer on the ground that the chassis has come out and the rack has become locked ...
  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 16 August 2019 13: 42
    +2
    Powerful bird, and beautiful. It flies so confidently ... Indicatively? Yes...
    1. RideMaster
      RideMaster 16 August 2019 14: 03
      -10
      Well, she flies clearly uncertainly but rather cautiously and lowly.
      Strive for objectivity, dreaming and helping out of the blue, the whole country is, why be like.
  6. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 16 August 2019 13: 45
    +6
    I think in the future the chassis should be removed?
    Yes, 20 Russian tons is not a pound of foreign raisins. It remains to wish success to the designers and fruitful work to the factory workers.
    good
    1. RideMaster
      RideMaster 16 August 2019 14: 05
      +15
      I've been here infrequently, but even I have already managed to read 50 explanatory comments once that the landing gears are not removed during the first flight. I don’t understand how you can skip such information on a regular basis?
    2. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 16 August 2019 14: 57
      +4
      Quote: ROSS 42
      I think in the future the chassis should be removed?

      it is already removed. It's just that it is often not removed on test flights, in order to avoid ... what if the systems fail and it will not work during landing? Is it worth ditching the device "for nothing" in order to please some of the townsfolk with the retracted chassis? The first test flights take place at low speed and altitude; the extended landing gear does not have a critical effect on the flight.
  7. Nycomed
    Nycomed 16 August 2019 13: 45
    +2
    Saw on TV, beautiful! good
  8. Piramidon
    Piramidon 16 August 2019 13: 49
    +5
    Quote: VO3A
    There is nothing yet, but we are already afraid of UAVs with this, we have already defeated everyone ..

    Revel in this ignorance with your NATO friends.
  9. RideMaster
    RideMaster 16 August 2019 14: 01
    -4
    I am generally touched about the experience in Syria and the application of experience. What experience is there? With slippers to fight?
    No, of course there is a moral moment for the pilots, such as they really can, in all other respects ... even those same 22 lenses fly there, what experience can be?
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 16 August 2019 14: 05
      +4
      experience is not only direct battles. these are exploration service holes. this is a change in logistics. this is management and many many many things. any war even this gives a lot of food for thought.
      1. RideMaster
        RideMaster 16 August 2019 14: 07
        -5
        I do not argue. But this instance is just for slippers. I can’t imagine yet where else can we drive slippers when they end in Syria. Maybe in Libya?
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 16 August 2019 15: 06
          +7
          Several times in your comment, your favorite word - "slippers", shines. Who is this? If these are those whom you dismissively mean, then they have long been not in slippers but in Turkish "ankle boots" on modern armored vehicles. If you treat your opponent with arrogance and disdain, then this has never led to anything good. But if something like the X-101 is installed on a similar aircraft, then not only your "slippers" will attend.
          1. RideMaster
            RideMaster 16 August 2019 15: 11
            -3
            A ha 101 he pull? I’m just clarifying
            Slippers are a collective image of a weak enemy without reb and air defense, well, if only Turkish berets can be shot down then yes.
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 16 August 2019 15: 20
              +2
              Quote: RideMaster
              A ha 101 he pull?

              While the tests are underway and the performance characteristics are not yet clear, as well as your categorical statement that he is imprisoned only against "slippers"
          2. RideMaster
            RideMaster 16 August 2019 15: 17
            -1
            I looked. One if just from the bottom you can probably attach x 101.
            But I don’t see why there is a hunter. They are better then to throw with that 95 and not to fool. The hunter is an extra link.
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 16 August 2019 16: 37
              +1
              Quote: RideMaster
              But I don’t see why there is a hunter. They are better then to throw with that 95 and not to fool

              What do you think is easier to produce, the Tu-95, of which there are not so many left and the production of which can hardly be resumed, or the Okhotnik?
              1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
                GELEZNII_KAPUT 16 August 2019 17: 22
                +2
                Quote: Piramidon
                What do you think is easier to produce, the Tu-95, of which there are not so many left and the production of which can hardly be resumed, or the Okhotnik?

                Why aren’t the Tu-160 flying ?!
                1. Piramidon
                  Piramidon 16 August 2019 17: 27
                  +1
                  Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
                  Why aren’t the Tu-160 flying ?!

                  Why, we have a lot of them?
                  1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
                    GELEZNII_KAPUT 16 August 2019 17: 31
                    0
                    Why, we have a lot of them?

                    Resume production
                    1. Piramidon
                      Piramidon 16 August 2019 18: 34
                      -3
                      Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
                      Resume production

                      So far, only in messages in the facebook.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 17 August 2019 11: 32
      0
      In Syria, experience has been gained in striking ground targets in a COMBAT SITUATION from helicopters and aircraft, including carrier-based aircraft with the Admiral Kuznetsov TAVKR, while our fighters also accompanied our attack aircraft so that American F-22s would not interfere with them and naturally removed parameters from their planes and I think they even worked out techniques for finding stealth aircraft and pointing our fighters at them. The network contains pictures of the F-22 in the sights of our fighters.

      For a modern airplane or UAV, it doesn’t matter who attacks the gangs of terrorists sponsored by the United States or NATO, the question here is the effectiveness of hitting a target.

      What matters more is what types of ammunition to hit, from which carriers and what characteristics such ammunition should have.

      Squadrons of such UAVs loaded to the eyeballs can be safely sent to the range of the ultimate flight without fear that our pilots might die (given the size and one engine of such an UAV, the flight range is likely to be under 4000 km, the combat radius is 2000 km, respectively) and put in all so much that little does not seem.

      Squadrons and pairs of such "Hunters" at low altitude, using stealth technology in their design, will be able to more effectively pass through the enemy's air defense lines, get close to the enemy's air defense system, ammunition and fuel depots, accumulations of enemy equipment and manpower, bridges, railway nodes and other important objects and destroy them at great depths in the rear of the enemy.

      The hunter is a unique UAV. Its uniqueness in size (the ability to carry a sufficient number of different weapons, flight range and stealth. I think the same will also be in the deck version and in the export version.
  10. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 16 August 2019 14: 02
    -1
    Beautiful bird))
  11. yehat
    yehat 16 August 2019 14: 10
    0
    Quote: Vol4ara
    Cool! And how a couple of years ago farts exploded in the VO - yes, this stealth is shit, and all the radars already see them, and the flying wing is not maneuverable at all, and we shot them down in dozens of Yugoslavia. But with the advent of su 57 and the hunter, somehow everyone shut up ...

    I didn’t understand what changes the fact of the appearance of su57 and this um ... Big Sadly Flying Apparatus
    Both are not stubborn without regard to achieving maximum stealth, but tried to integrate the most balanced amount of different performance characteristics.
    By the way, the Americans chose not the most "stealth" prototype when choosing the F-22.
    1. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 16 August 2019 14: 27
      0
      Quote: yehat
      Quote: Vol4ara
      Cool! And how a couple of years ago farts exploded in the VO - yes, this stealth is shit, and all the radars already see them, and the flying wing is not maneuverable at all, and we shot them down in dozens of Yugoslavia. But with the advent of su 57 and the hunter, somehow everyone shut up ...

      I didn’t understand what changes the fact of the appearance of su57 and this um ... Big Sadly Flying Apparatus
      Both are not stubborn without regard to achieving maximum stealth, but tried to integrate the most balanced amount of different performance characteristics.
      By the way, the Americans chose not the most "stealth" prototype when choosing the F-22.

      When there wasn’t even a hint of stealth from ourselves, then the stealth was all crap. As soon as something appeared, then everyone was silent. What is not clear here
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 16 August 2019 16: 53
        +1
        Quote: Vol4ara

        When there wasn’t even a hint of stealth from ourselves, then the stealth was all crap.

        No one stealth messed up. All rightly were unsure of the balance in the American flying, which, for the sake of flying characteristics, gave a very original appearance.
        The Americans give some unrealistic data on the EPR of their aircraft .., justifying castration by maneuverability and speed.
  12. yehat
    yehat 16 August 2019 14: 17
    +3
    Quote: Nycomed
    Saw on TV, beautiful! good

    and you buy a split-screen TV and, in parallel with the flight, start a beauty contest or video of the execution of Chubais with Gorbachev. It will be even more beautiful.
    1. RUSS
      RUSS 16 August 2019 14: 21
      -12
      Quote: yehat
      video of the execution of Chubais with Gorbachev.

      In current realities, the Chekist execution video will be more popular
      1. yehat
        yehat 16 August 2019 14: 26
        +8
        I see no reason for such hatred of "Chekist".
  13. yehat
    yehat 16 August 2019 14: 31
    +3
    Quote: Vol4ara
    As soon as something appeared, then everyone was silent. What is not clear here

    I do not evaluate the opinion of the crowd of profane as significant. And I'm not at all interested in the sound power of this crowd. The strength of their cries does not increase the strength of arguments. And if you ignore them, it was not that everyone was yelling, and then they were silent. Everyone was interested in precisely the proportion of the balance between the desire to get a part of stealth, resist stealth and get the maximum of traditionally significant performance characteristics.
  14. Mentat
    Mentat 16 August 2019 15: 20
    +6
    Quote: Vol4ara
    Cool! And how a couple of years ago farts exploded in the VO - yes, this stealth is shit, and all the radars already see them, and the flying wing is not maneuverable at all, and we shot them down in dozens of Yugoslavia. But with the advent of su 57 and the hunter, somehow everyone shut up ...

    Individual visitors who gnash their teeth from excess bile at the sight of Russian achievements did not shut up at VO.

    Once again, for the most advanced: no "stealth", i.e. invisibility does not exist, there are methods to reduce radar visibility, which work in limited conditions. This is not some kind of prodigy with which the West is trying to present these technologies in order to attribute some incredible properties to its aircraft, but to itself incredible technological achievements.
    1. Constructor68
      Constructor68 16 August 2019 15: 39
      +2
      As there is no notorious EPR. Which is essentially an abstract quantity. But most sofa experts use this meaning with such aplomb, as if this knowledge was brought by Moses on the tablets
  15. Amateur
    Amateur 16 August 2019 16: 50
    +1
    And why on the front strut of the chassis headlight? She shines for whom?

    Dear members of the VO site. I apologize in advance to colleagues who put a "minus" on my comment on the headlight. I would really like to clarify why you put "-". Because you are offended about the UAV, or have you not read V. Pelevin? Thanks in advance for your feedback.
  16. FC Rostov
    FC Rostov 16 August 2019 17: 50
    0
    God forbid those professional who created this colossus (killer with a glove and fsh)
  17. svp67
    svp67 16 August 2019 19: 07
    0
    How big he is ...
  18. Mixanchik
    Mixanchik 16 August 2019 19: 12
    0
    The less information, the more serious the bird .. hi I remember many here sneering, supposedly enough for us cartoons from Putin)))) Now they shut their mouths and it's very good, but they switched to OUR "bloody regime" for protests .. wink