Military Review

Pyongyang refused any further negotiations with Seoul

43
North Korea refuses any further negotiations with South Korea. This was reported by the Central Telegraph Agency of Korea (CTAC).


Pyongyang refused any further negotiations with Seoul


Pyongyang criticized the speech of South Korean President Moon Jae In on the occasion of the Liberation of Korea, in which he mentioned the "disturbing actions of the DPRK" and the positive actions of South Korea aimed at establishing peace. Pyongyang said it did not intend to conduct further negotiations with Seoul. According to the representative of the North Korean Committee for the Peaceful Unification of the Homeland, Seoul is simultaneously conducting military exercises with the United States and hopes that the next stage of the negotiations will begin "naturally."

The South Korean authorities want to get a catch through future negotiations between the DPRK and the United States, twisted in the clouds, if they believe that the next stage of negotiations will come naturally after the joint military exercises with the United States, like a change of seasons in nature. It’s better for them to give up such reckless desires as soon as possible.

- the comment says.

In the DPRK, the president of South Korea was called "a scoundrel, what else to look for," which quotes "inspiring slogans" and called his statements empty.

Even at that moment, joint military exercises against the DPRK continue in South Korea. Does he have a conscience to talk about the atmosphere of dialogue, the peaceful economy and the peacekeeping mechanism. (...) He's really an impudent person to look for

- CTAK quotes a North Korean representative.

In turn, Seoul once again demanded that Pyongyang stop launching "unidentified shells", warning that the continuation of missile launches could lead to an escalation of military tension in the area of ​​the Korean Peninsula.
Photos used:
https://ru.depositphotos.com/
43 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nycomed
    Nycomed 16 August 2019 10: 56
    -1
    Again, "all over again, okay." negative
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 16 August 2019 11: 44
      +1
      music played for a short while ...
      1. Civil
        Civil 16 August 2019 11: 59
        -25
        In general, negotiations are impossible in principle, Kim alone decides in the DPRK, and representative democracy in South Korea. The autocratic (absolutist) tsar, who considers the people to be his property, can never agree with a people who does not accept kings. It’s the same as if Nicholas 2 tried to agree on something with the Bolsheviks.
        1. Cryvedco
          Cryvedco 16 August 2019 12: 13
          +11
          I am a liberal transvestite if there is democracy in South Korea.
          1. Civil
            Civil 16 August 2019 12: 25
            -6
            Quote: Creedco
            I am a liberal transvestite if there is democracy in South Korea.

            You can go for false breasts laughing
            8 parties in parliament, 12 president from the war, advanced economy, free exit, brutal corruption investigations, high income, high life expectancy, did not fall under any sanctions.
            1. Cryvedco
              Cryvedco 16 August 2019 12: 29
              +8
              Quote: Civil
              under no sanctions did not fall.

              From this is finally the most important indicator
              1. Civil
                Civil 16 August 2019 12: 50
                -4
                Quote: Creedco
                From this is finally the most important indicator

                That is, the ability to be smart and rich is not evaluated in any way? The DPRK is also smart and rich, a list of members of the Politburo can be found on the Internet. The rest go in line and do not ask stupid questions.
                1. Svarog
                  Svarog 16 August 2019 13: 39
                  -1
                  Quote: Civil
                  That is, the ability to be smart and rich is not evaluated in any way?

                  Among the cheers of patriots, this is not appreciated. They do not want to reason with them enough of what is put into their heads.
            2. Wolf
              Wolf 16 August 2019 14: 39
              +4
              AND WASALI USA! anyway, to power! ;)
              1. Wolf
                Wolf 16 August 2019 14: 45
                +4
                They must know that Korea was liberated by the USSR army in 1945! And immediately the USA ZLOCHINTSI AND CRIMINALSI drove in and managed to deliver Y. K as a BIG state.
                1. Nycomed
                  Nycomed 16 August 2019 15: 56
                  0
                  "Who stood on whom? Take the trouble to express your thoughts more clearly."
                  M.A. Bulgakov "Heart of a Dog"
                  1. Crimean partisan 1974
                    Crimean partisan 1974 16 August 2019 17: 36
                    +3
                    "Who stood on whom? ------ a question about the compaction at the meeting of the tenants of our house. They say even Isydra Duncan did not have a dining room. And evil tongues said that she also cut rabbits in the bathroom
        2. Crimean partisan 1974
          Crimean partisan 1974 16 August 2019 17: 46
          +5
          Kim in the DPRK alone decides, and in South Korea representative democracy ..... yeah, democracy on the State Department’s dildo is flat. where the State Department will turn there and the course, but in Pyongyang everything is clear, God forbid, we’ll arrange the devil knows what and not any bagels
      2. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 16 August 2019 21: 48
        +3
        Quote: Aerodrome
        music played for a short while ...

        Well, as required. yes The "candy-bouquet" period was short.
        The Kimovites did not fall for it and continued to write their history further, having previously "sharpened their pencils." laughing Actually, there were no illusions, because in the past there were moments of more serious progress in terms of the North-South dialogue, but this did not give real results. Under Kim Jong Il, the President of South Korea even came to Pyongyang. Then they rolled back again, and so every time. Both are in fact "proxies" in the regional confrontation between the superpowers, which, in turn, are not very interested in a new large and independent player in the region. They, of course, are not pitted until the hot phase (for it will affect everyone), but they are not allowed to be friends either.
  2. Pedrodepackes
    Pedrodepackes 16 August 2019 11: 07
    +1
    According to the representative of the North Korean Committee for the Peaceful Unification of the Homeland, Seoul is simultaneously conducting military exercises with the United States.

    In turn, Seoul once again demanded from Pyongyang to stop launching "unidentified shells"
    in general, both are good, like two boys in a sandbox ... funny, if not for nuclear weapons in the hands of "boys"
    1. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 16 August 2019 11: 20
      +2
      Quote: Pedrodepackes
      in general, both are good, like two boys in a sandbox ... funny, if not for nuclear weapons in the hands of "boys"

      ... one of them.
      According to the representative of the North Korean Committee for the Peaceful Unification of the Homeland, Seoul conducts military exercises with the USA at the same time and hopes that the next stage of negotiations will come "naturally.

      When two boys play in the sandbox, then to an outsider a man on a horse (cowboy) does not (the name of a plant known in Russia) climb to them with a colt and a lasso ....
      1. Pedrodepackes
        Pedrodepackes 16 August 2019 11: 22
        -1
        Quote: ROSS 42
        When two boys play in the sandbox, then to an outsider a man on a horse (cowboy) does not (the name of a plant known in Russia) climb to them with a colt and a lasso

        so one of the boys is so brave that behind
        Quote: ROSS 42
        stranger on a horse (cowboy)
        stands and plays with the colt
        1. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 16 August 2019 11: 32
          +2
          Quote: Pedrodepackes
          so one of the boys is so brave that behind a stranger on a horse (cowboy) stands and plays with the Colt

          The boy is brave and sensible, so he knows how the "games" of adult uncles with colts and horses for little boys end. Uncle is crazy. In addition, the Nobel Peace Prize may pass by ... request
          1. Paranoid50
            Paranoid50 16 August 2019 21: 55
            +3
            Quote: ROSS 42
            The Nobel Peace Prize may pass by ...

            Duc, it’s now, it seems, on the contrary, they give it for unleashed wars. request "Smoked Lucifer" Obamka will not let you lie. wassat
  3. prior
    prior 16 August 2019 11: 18
    +1
    Who is Trump?
    Just one of the US presidents during the reign of the Eun Dynasty in North Korea.
    And who will Eun become after unification of Koreas? With a high degree of probability - the prisoner Guantanamo.
    And why did he need such a union ?!
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 16 August 2019 11: 19
    +3
    In such cases, it is said - Someone must take the FIRST step towards reconciliation !!! -
    BUT, there they rule minke whales, they rule as they want, not paying attention to anyone!
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280 16 August 2019 12: 00
      +4
      So there were steps .. Even the leaders of both Koreas met on the demarcation line .. for the first time, it seems .. And they praised each other ..
      So why were these teachings needed with America ?? It is clear to whom it is beneficial ..
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 16 August 2019 12: 28
        +1
        Quote: Roman070280
        It is clear to whom it is beneficial ..

        Oh, things are complicated there for a long time .... striped rule under the UN brand! to get them out of there, even if they want, this is a problem.
  5. ddmitrij
    ddmitrij 16 August 2019 11: 23
    +2
    South Korea may and would like to stop joint exercises with the United States, but the Korean army is subordinate to the US ambassador. So it’s unlikely that something will work out. Sorry.
  6. Nycomed
    Nycomed 16 August 2019 11: 24
    -8
    Eun was offended, he expected some violent reaction from the whole world to the last launches of his missiles. And there was no reaction, not that "stormy", but none at all.
    1. Nycomed
      Nycomed 16 August 2019 12: 34
      -2
      I even know the name of Eun's successor.
  7. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 16 August 2019 11: 25
    +8
    The South Korean authorities want to get a catch through future negotiations between the DPRK and the United States, twisted in the clouds, if they believe that the next stage of negotiations will come naturally after the joint military exercises with the United States, like a change of seasons in nature. It’s better for them to give up such reckless desires as soon as possible.
    Well said . To a point and without tricks - respect and respect. Unfortunately, in the Western media the meaning and these words themselves will be distorted. In the information war with Comrade We have no chance, there remains hope for a direct and clear line of the party. We wish Comrade success. S in his struggle with world imperialism. In Seoul, they would be happy to change their line, but few can ...
  8. Elysium
    Elysium 16 August 2019 11: 35
    0
    Which is to be expected. If there will be some kind of unification of Koreas, then not in the next generation. Too different, a lot of cats between ran and plus external factors and players.
  9. Roman070280
    Roman070280 16 August 2019 11: 58
    +3
    Even at that moment, joint military exercises against the DPRK continue in South Korea. Does he have a conscience to talk about the atmosphere of dialogue, the peaceful economy and the peacekeeping mechanism.

    But the DPRK is completely right ..
  10. syndicalist
    syndicalist 16 August 2019 11: 58
    +2
    We will discuss anything - from the purchase of Greenland, to the words of some kind of North Korean bureaucrats, but not the news of recent days - the Lavrovs actual offer to transfer the Kuril Islands to the Japanese.
    Admins VO, ay!
    The pause dragged on to complete indecency.
    1. Black_Vatnik
      Black_Vatnik 16 August 2019 12: 23
      +1
      The solution to this issue will partly depend on us. Or we will eat it, because "Who if not Putin?" ! "
      On the last May 9, going out into the city and looking at the many thousands of people with ribbons and portraits, I thought to myself "Where were you all when you raised the retirement age and VAT?"
  11. Black_Vatnik
    Black_Vatnik 16 August 2019 12: 19
    +2
    Eun is bent, they told me a year ago on this site.
    Trump bent Eun, ”they repeated.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 16 August 2019 22: 00
      0
      Quote: Black_Jacket
      Trump bent Eun, ”they repeated.

      Why didn’t they just say ... fellow
  12. Old26
    Old26 16 August 2019 15: 12
    +2
    Pyongyang criticized South Korean President Moon Jae-in's speech on the occasion of Korea's Liberation Day, in which he referred to "the DPRK's alarming actions" and South Korea's positive actions aimed at establishing peace. Pyongyang said they do not intend to conduct further negotiations with Seoul. According to a spokesman for the North Korean Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Homeland, Seoul is simultaneously conducting military exercises with the United States and hopes that the next stage of negotiations will come "naturally."

    That is, the respected top leader hoped that he would do whatever he wanted by conducting rocket launches, and his neighbors would applaud him? Sorry, but South Korea hardly wants to be "under the Labor Party of Korea and personally respected top leader Eun. Negotiations are always a compromise. And here I want and will launch rockets, and you conduct exercises - no, no

    In the DPRK, the president of South Korea was called "a scoundrel, what else to look for," which quotes "inspiring slogans" and called his statements empty.

    Well, who could be the president of South Korea. Only a scoundrel.

    Quote: Roman070280
    So there were steps .. Even the leaders of both Koreas met on the demarcation line .. for the first time, it seems .. And they praised each other ..
    So why were these teachings needed with America ?? It is clear to whom it is beneficial ..

    And why was it necessary to arrange missile launches after a long moratorium? What, there was an aggravation on the Korean peninsula ???

    Quote: Nycomed
    Eun was offended, he expected some violent reaction from the whole world to the last launches of his missiles. And there was no reaction, not that "stormy", but none at all.

    Yes, there are so many new "nishtyaks" shown, but no one admired. It's a shame. I wonder what Eun was counting on by arranging these demonstration launches? That the UK will not do anything? Refuse to exercise with the United States? Maybe they would have refused if Eun did not arrange his military games
  13. Mcar
    Mcar 16 August 2019 15: 44
    -1
    Pyongyang refused any further negotiations with Seoul

    And rightly so.

    For understanding. North Korea is Korea itself. And South Korea is an occupied territory. Who needs clarification?
    1. Nycomed
      Nycomed 16 August 2019 21: 50
      -1
      Is the people of South Korea obvious?
  14. Yaro Polk
    Yaro Polk 16 August 2019 15: 46
    -1
    The honeymoon was not long, yeah, you might think the Semeru amerkos will be allowed to reunite with Pyongyang, they only know how to disconnect their brothers. The people, in this they are proffes, they can’t take it away, geeks laughing
  15. Popov Konstantin Ivanovich
    Popov Konstantin Ivanovich 16 August 2019 15: 55
    0
    It’s interesting, but how does the North Neighbor of the Korean Democratic Republic (which is not the Russian Federation) look at all this mess? There are more severe guys angry rather than a "cowboy with a colt" and they have more weighty arguments than NN.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 16 August 2019 22: 51
      0
      Quote: Popov Konstantin Ivanovich
      North Neighbor of Korean NDR (which is not the Russian Federation)

      Duc, this is not just a neighbor - this is the Senior Brother-guardian. yes The next launches take place against the background of the next phase of the trade war between this Brother and Uncle over a puddle.
      Quote: Popov Konstantin Ivanovich
      they have more arguments than Eun.

      Duc, in fact, is also their arguments. laughing
  16. E.S.
    E.S. 16 August 2019 16: 16
    0
    Quote: Civil
    In general, negotiations are impossible in principle, Kim alone decides in the DPRK, and representative democracy in South Korea. The autocratic (absolutist) tsar, who considers the people to be his property, can never agree with a people who does not accept kings. It’s the same as if Nicholas 2 tried to agree on something with the Bolsheviks.


    A person cannot agree on a television whose remote control is in Uncle Sam’s hand.
    It is also impossible to negotiate with a crowd in the market, with an anthill or a group of individuals with different interests
  17. APASUS
    APASUS 16 August 2019 17: 14
    0
    Maybe the United States gave economic freedom to South Korea, but the southerners do not have a political management plan, the United States dominates here. It was naive to immediately put hopes on the agreement of the two
  18. Mixanchik
    Mixanchik 16 August 2019 17: 38
    -2
    The condition for the negotiations of the two Koreas is one, WITHOUT the USA! .. They would agree, Eun is not so dictator and is negotiating on an equal footing. He will squeeze them all the same!
  19. Nosgoth
    Nosgoth 18 August 2019 18: 59
    0
    AUTHOR, is it "impudent" or "scoundrel"?
    And then they called it a "scoundrel" in the text, but in the quote it says - "impudent", how is it, inattention or on purpose?