Third-generation anti-tank missile systems

49
For greater convenience, anti-tank missile systems are usually divided into several generations, taking into account their features and capabilities. According to the most common version of such a classification, three generations of complexes are currently in operation, and in the future, the fourth will enter the army. Consider the main features of the third generation ATGM, classification problems and existing samples.


ATGM FGM-148 Javelin in position. Photo US Army




Classification Issues


The formation of a new generation of anti-tank systems, which later received the third number, began at the turn of the seventies and eighties of the last century. During this period, electronics and rocket technology made it possible to create an ATGM capable of independently performing part of the necessary functions and relieve the operator.

It is believed that the main criterion for the third generation of complexes is the presence of a missile with a “start-and-forget” function. At the same time, tactical and technical characteristics and combat capabilities fade into the background. This definition of generation corresponds to a number of modern anti-tank systems developed by some countries.

The concept of the next fourth generation is also proposed, but there is controversy surrounding it. So, according to popular belief, this generation will include systems with maximum autonomy, capable of independently finding the target and attacking it without the participation of the operator. However, the Israeli company Rafael, which produces the anti-tank systems of the Spike family, offers a different classification. According to this version, its missiles with the function of retargeting in flight should be attributed to the fourth generation. The new Spike ATGMs have controls with elements of artificial intelligence, and therefore it is proposed that they be allocated to the fifth generation.


Spike-LR portable system. Wikimedia Commons Photos


However, according to the generally accepted classification, Israeli anti-tank systems should be classified as the current third generation. However, the issue of whether a product belongs to a particular generation of technology does not actually affect its characteristics or commercial potential.

Generation representatives


Probably the most famous third-generation ATGM is the American-designed FGM-148 Javelin system. This complex was created in the mid-eighties and in the 1996 was adopted by the US Army. It was also supplied to third countries. Since then, the FGM-148 has been used repeatedly in combat.

The Javelin ATGM missile is equipped with an infrared homing head with a cooled matrix. The design of the GOS uses solutions aimed at increasing the efficiency of capture and tracking of a heat-contrast target. In flight, a rocket performs a maneuver in height and hits a target from the upper hemisphere. The tandem warhead provides penetration of at least 600 mm homogeneous armor for dynamic protection. The maximum range of application is 3 km.

The Israeli company Rafael offers customers six options for multi-purpose ATGM Spike, as well as several of their modifications with various innovations. The first samples of this line came into service in the early eighties; the process of modernization and development does not stop to this day. Spike systems are in service with several countries and have been used repeatedly in combat.


Spike-NLOS Long Range Missile. Wikimedia Commons Photos


A common feature of all Spike missiles is the use of an infrared seeker with the “start-and-forget” principle. In some cases, other systems also receive missiles, including radio or wireline control. In addition to the “run-and-forget”, some products have the function of searching for and capturing a target in flight and redirecting it after launching at the operator’s command.

ATGM “Spike” of various modifications show the maximum firing range from 1,5 to 25 km. The characteristics of combat equipment also differ. In this case, both cumulative and fragmentation warheads were developed. Spike missiles are used on different platforms on the ground and in the air.

Of particular interest is the ATG “Nag” developed by the Indian company Bharat Dynamics Limited. This system was created from the beginning of the eighties, but successful tests were carried out only in the middle of the two thousandth. Then the ATGM was adopted and entered the series. The Nag missiles are used as part of the land system on the BMP-1 chassis. The helicopter complex is still being tested.


Launch of the Nag rocket from the NAMICA-1 installation. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of India / pibcms.nic.in


In the basic version, the Nag rocket is equipped with an infrared seeker. Since a certain time, an active radar head has been in development. In its current form, the missile captures the target before launch and heads towards it along the optimal path with a defeat in the upper projection. Overhead ATGM range reaches 4 km, aviation version should shoot at 8-10 km. Penetration is not specified, but it is claimed that the missile is capable of hitting modern Tanks.

Currently, the company BDL is finalizing the ATGM "Nag" for use on new media, and is also developing modernized versions of the rocket and control equipment. It is planned to improve flight performance and introduce a new GOS.

In 2014, China presented its version of the third generation ATGM. The HJ-12 is a portable guided missile system for infantry use. In terms of architecture and methods of application, the Hongjian-12 complex is similar to Javelin and some modifications of Spike. According to various sources, the HJ-12 is already in service with the PLA and can be supplied to third countries.

The HJ-12 missile is equipped with an infrared seeker capable of searching for targets day and night. GOS fully complies with the “run-and-forget” principle with the capture of the target before launch. Firing range reaches in the daytime 4 km, at night - half as much. The use of a tandem warhead with armor penetration up to 1100 mm of homogeneous armor for dynamic protection is claimed.

Third-generation anti-tank missile systems
Portable complex HJ-12. Photo Defense-update.com


For a number of reasons, third-generation ATGMs are not yet in service with the Russian army. Our armed forces continue to use second-generation systems in which target destruction is ensured by automatic fire control. However, the development of fundamentally new systems is already underway. The first domestic next-generation ATGMs can enter the troops in the medium term.

Advantages and disadvantages


The main advantage of the third generation ATGM is the presence of a fully autonomous GOS, capable of hitting a target without operator intervention. Thanks to this, the complex can leave the position immediately after the shot, without risking falling under retaliation. Manual or semi-automatic guidance of a rocket from this point of view makes it difficult to solve a combat mission and leads to certain risks.

The appearance of shot-and-forget missiles is directly related to the development of electronics. Another result of this process was the emergence of new functions, such as finding and capturing a target in flight or changing a target directly on the trajectory. Also, thanks to the development of electronic systems, the possibilities of working for external target designation, transferring a flying rocket under the control of another launcher, etc. are being introduced.

However, all such advantages are associated with characteristic disadvantages. A modern rocket with advanced GOS and controls is of high cost. From the point of view of the cost of production and operation of the third generation ATGMs noticeably lose to the second. In the third generation, sophisticated electronics are available on the launcher and on the rocket. The second generation provides for the use of more complex and expensive systems only on the media, while the rocket is simplified and cheaper.


Missiles "Hongjian-12". Photo Defense-update.com


It is the economic characteristics of different ATGMs that are the main prerequisite for the situation observed in the world. Leading countries are developing and putting into service their third generation systems. Other armies buy this weapon. At the same time, the development of second-generation ATGMs continues, and such products are no less popular in the international market.

However, in a number of situations, third-generation ATGMs, including with additional features, they have obvious advantages over other systems. Thus, it should be expected that in the foreseeable future, the systems of two generations will enjoy the success of the international market at once. This situation will continue until the fundamentally new next-generation ATGMs enter the market. When this happens is unclear. It can be assumed that the appearance of a conditional fourth-generation ATGM will hit the positions of its predecessors, but it will not be able to quickly displace them from the market and from arsenals.

The development of the third generation of anti-tank systems continues, and new models with special capabilities regularly appear. Progress in this area allows some manufacturers to even talk about the start of new generations. However, the emergence of new systems does not yet threaten the third generation. Obviously, this generation will remain in service for a long time and will soon give way to other complexes.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    19 August 2019 18: 17
    Thank you for the article
  2. +5
    19 August 2019 18: 26
    Interesting article. It is a pity that our third generation is still only in development.
    1. 0
      25 August 2019 12: 45
      The lag in the production of high-quality thermal imaging matrices affects.
      1. -1
        2 October 2019 08: 44
        Quote: 3danimal
        The lag in the production of high-quality thermal imaging matrices affects.

        Savings again. What is more expensive than a tank or a tank? plus with armor penetration, we are not so hot
        1. 0
          2 October 2019 18: 12
          But with the armor penetration, everything is fine (quite powerful warheads have been created). Another thing is that Javelin compensates for his lightness (and the lower power of his warhead) with a “slide” maneuver and an attack on the weakly protected tower roof / top of the engine compartment.
          The price of ATGM ($ 200000) is still less than the price of T-72B / B3, T-90A / ... and others, and most importantly, this is tactical efficiency. After all, a tank that breaks through will cause much greater damage.
  3. -1
    19 August 2019 18: 53
    Great article. Clearly and clearly.
  4. +2
    19 August 2019 20: 19
    Anti-tankers tell me pliz without banter, why on the launch tube healthy washers at both ends? On our ATGM I did not see them
    1. +9
      19 August 2019 20: 28
      Foamed polymer.
      Edge Protection
      1. 0
        19 August 2019 20: 30
        But it looks rather bulky and lugging uncomfortable thanks for the answer
        1. +6
          19 August 2019 20: 39
          Quote: CommanderDIVA
          But it looks rather bulky and lugging uncomfortable thanks for the answer

          This is polystyrene. Almost no weight.
      2. 0
        19 August 2019 23: 55
        To reduce wear?
  5. -1
    19 August 2019 20: 48
    Technically, Ptur does not present complexity in GOS.
    But we need to decide whether we need a shooter for shooting when it is convenient for us or for shooting when necessary. The second generation shoots and gets when necessary and where necessary to a range many times greater than the third generation.
    The fatal flaw of the third generation is the need to capture the target before launch. The capture range is highly dependent on the conditions of use.
    Locking a target on a trajectory without operator participation is extremely problematic because it is produced against the background of the underlying surface with a huge amount of natural and, in general, artificial interference. If you make a communication line "ATU-operator", then in a normal army it is more logical to use a RUK or an attack UAV.
    In addition, the so-called. "drone-kamikaze" in fact is, incl. anti-tank agent
    1. +3
      20 August 2019 17: 27
      range, it’s written in the article about spike and 25 km, there are no problems with range, just to shoot further you need more rockets (more fuel, more lenses and matrixes to see further, etc.), javelin (today this is the standard - a very successfully made set ) was originally designed for a certain range, because weight is also important for soldiers !!!!!!!!! you can make them drag rockets of 30-50kg that will hit 10-30km and what's the point? real battle he is near !!!!!!!!! and how many of these banduras can soldiers take with them? once again, you want a range - see a long-range spike (at 25 km) but the Israelis do not carry it in their hands, and the installation is on jeeps :)))
      so what about range myth
      Now about the capture: that is, all those "tripods" of the 2nd generation complexes that are placed on the hills !!!!! do not need to install? don't you risk your life? I'm already silent about the fact that most of them do not have remote control (nonsense) and you need to stand at the "machine" while the rocket flies to the whole world showing yourself shining with a laser, Is it safe? ... but the javelin operator should stick his neck out of the trench on a few tens of seconds without irradiating anything with a laser, press the button and dive into the trench are they kamikaze? There is no need to juggle, the complexes of the 3rd generation reduce the risks for their operators by orders of magnitude!
      1. 0
        25 August 2019 12: 52
        You are wrong, operators of 1-2 generations must steadfastly endure a high threat to life and despise the faint-hearted operators of the 3rd generation;))
    2. 0
      2 October 2019 18: 16
      This is all the discussion on the topic "how good it would be ..."
      3rd generation ATGM does not give itself out when aiming, does not require participation and does not make the operator vulnerable after firing.
      Range of application? On Javelin (3-generation light ATGM), the light did not converge in a wedge. There are Spyke, for example, of any size and at any range.
  6. 0
    19 August 2019 21: 41
    Read interesting. And what about Russian complexes?
  7. +1
    19 August 2019 22: 25
    French MMP, according to the author, is not a 3rd generation ATGM?
    1. -1
      10 June 2023 10: 57
      Quote: Corn
      French MMP, according to the author, is not a 3rd generation ATGM?

      The French themselves call it the 5th generation ATGM.
  8. -1
    19 August 2019 22: 43
    Interesting article, thanks!
  9. Hey
    +1
    19 August 2019 23: 10
    I always wondered, reading about such "wunerfalls", how quickly and how long their consumption will be replenished during intensive hostilities.
    1. +2
      20 August 2019 10: 25
      Well, probably a little faster and a little cheaper than replenishing destroyed combat vehicles, with crews ...
    2. +1
      20 August 2019 13: 01
      Quote: MUD
      how quickly and for how long their consumption will be replenished during intense hostilities

      When used properly for their intended purpose, they may end earlier.
    3. 0
      25 August 2019 12: 54
      By intensity you mean the scale of World 2 ??
  10. -2
    20 August 2019 00: 24
    I wonder how the infrared head and 25 km range are combined in Spike? What is this "keen eye?"
    And why does the night so interfere with the HJ-12 infrared head that the range drops by half? On the contrary, interference and false targets are less.
    1. 0
      20 August 2019 02: 14
      infrared head and 25 km range

      Something like this is how they "combine".

      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_NLOS


      1. 0
        20 August 2019 10: 09
        According to the article - they do not match, there is no "shot and forgot". This is not the third generation.
        1. 0
          22 August 2019 00: 35
          There is this concept, you can launch a rocket and forget about it, if you can’t escape immediately, 25 km will save you. And according to other criteria, this is the third generation and maybe even more.
    2. 0
      20 August 2019 04: 36
      Quote: bk0010
      And why does the night interfere with the HJ-12 infrared head so much that the range drops by half?

      Yes, there may be confusion in the explanations! Here is what I, for example, learned when the first reports about HJ-12 appeared ...: IR-GOS (thermal imaging ...) allows you to use a rocket with 2 km ...; TV (!) (TV-GOS) - with 4 km!
    3. 0
      25 August 2019 12: 59
      Approximately the same as in explosives with ARLGSN missiles. The autopilot leads to the desired square, where the thermal imaging seeker finds a target that matches the image in his memory.
  11. -4
    20 August 2019 01: 04
    It would only be interesting to find out how effective it is in hitting a tank roof when firing from the front. There, both the stream and the fragments on the same Leopard should go nowhere. And what's the point?
    1. 0
      20 August 2019 02: 17
      how effective is getting into the roof of a tank when shooting from the front

      As effective as possible from any direction. 100% penetration of the armor, and taking into account the large power of the ATG data, the jet will fly deep.
      1. 0
        20 August 2019 10: 03
        and taking into account the high power of the ATG data warhead, the jet will fly deep.

        in the case of TOU like them, this is not a jet, but a shock core. Which is easily broken by simple screens.
        1. 0
          20 August 2019 16: 30
          Quote: Ka-52
          in the case of TOU like them, this is not a jet, but a shock core. Which is easily broken by simple screens.

          belay ???! Are you going to “break” the armor-piercing core of an armor-piercing sabot projectile just as “easily”? sad
          1. +1
            21 August 2019 10: 41
            what does it have to do with it
            armor-piercing core armor-piercing projectile? sad

            it was a question of an attack from the upper hemisphere. Have your BOPS started to maneuver in height before hitting?
            The impact core is not your armor-piercing core. They are connected only by the method of influencing the barrier (kinetic). Unlike the core, the pestle can be broken by screens.
            1. 0
              21 August 2019 11: 28
              Quote: Ka-52
              Have your BOPS started to maneuver in height before hitting?

              And what? Good idea! But I mentioned BOPS for another reason ...
              Quote: Ka-52
              Impact core is not an armor-piercing core for you

              I do not argue...
              Quote: Ka-52
              Unlike the core, the pestle can be broken by screens.

              How ? what They themselves said that "the method of influencing the obstacle is kinetic"! How does the screen (then ... what screen? What screen?) Breaks a "blyamba" made of dense heavy metal (copper, tantalum, copper-tantalum alloy ...), which has an awesome kinetic energy comparable to the energy of BOPS? If the "shock core" after the formation "approaches" the armor "correctly oriented", then the action of the "nucleus" is similar to the action of BOPS! In principle, it is possible that the screen can change the flight trajectory of the "nucleus" and the orientation of the "nucleus" on the flight path, but only under certain conditions! EFP-penetrators are also being developed, which will not differ much from the armor-piercing cores (penetrators) of BOPS!
              1. 0
                22 August 2019 04: 50
                the pestle collapses after interacting with a steel screen 3-5 mm thick. Behind such a screen, the nucleus is crushed into 25-30 fragments, which are distributed over an area with a diameter of 100 mm on an obstacle installed at a distance of 300 mm behind the screen. In this case, the breakdown effect of the formed fragments does not exceed 10-12 mm. The standard probability of hitting SPBE in the roof of ours, that of Amer’s tanks (without additional protection) is about 0,4. With the simplest screen, the probability of dropping to a decent 0,1. That's all arithmetic.
        2. 0
          22 August 2019 00: 33
          We start with the second generation TOW-2B complex, we end up with the fact that this rocket hits the roof not even at an angle, but in fact it’s impossible to put grilles and something like that for objective reasons in the roof of the tank, except for DZ, but this is a different story.
          1. 0
            22 August 2019 05: 39
            grilles cannot be installed on the tank roof

            sure. Just if we are not talking about bed lattices from the history of Ukraine and Syria, but the protection of the container type.
            except that DZ

            conventional DZ against shock nuclei is not an assistant. Unless in the form of a variant of a remote control like NERA or the like, in which protection based on the use of materials capable of absorbing part of the pestle and giving it in the form of a moving bulge interacting with it
            1. 0
              22 August 2019 09: 22
              and container type protection.

              it is impossible to put grilles and something similar on the tank roof for objective reasons

              The objective reason is the crew hatches and all kinds of equipment occupying a place on the roof. And in general, of all the 3 missile systems that I remember (NLAW, SRAW and TOW 2B) that hit the roof on the span: 1 is not a third generation complex (TOW) at all, and the other two seem to fit the criteria, but I'm not sure, and only one of them uses an impact core (NLAW)
              Unless in the form of a variant of a remote control like NERA or the like

              I don’t know, I don’t understand. I know that NERA is a "classmate" of the domestic Cactus and both are executed in the form of large blocks that are difficult to place on the roof (sort of like). And I know that even the simplest remote sensing device should help, although not much, from BOPS and BPS, if they have a sufficiently low speed, and probably against the cores should also help.
  12. +2
    20 August 2019 05: 04
    Well, the Israelis and borzanuli (!) ... 4th, 5th generations! So you can reach the 10th generation! And how many "specialists" now can count St. 10 without a computer? If we adhere to the NATO classification, then missiles with a seeker + 2-way data line (2LPD) (the ability to detect, identify, retarget in flight by an operator using a 2LPD and a seeker ...) should be attributed to the generation 3 + ... missiles with "independent "(automatic) function of detection, target identification can be attributed to the generation 3 ++ (although, in this case, it is already possible to argue about the 4th generation ...) But missiles with network-centric functions (NLOS LS) can immediately be attributed to the 4th generation!
  13. +1
    20 August 2019 05: 42
    However, the development of fundamentally new systems is already underway.

    The American media are interested in a new portable anti-tank missile system being developed in Russia. They are trying to compare it with the Javelin, but the Russian ATGM will probably surpass the "American" in some respects.

    https://rg.ru/2019/02/17/novyj-ubijca-tankov-nato-v-ssha-ocenili-rossijskij-analog-javelin.html
  14. +1
    20 August 2019 12: 55
    ATGMs are becoming more and more expensive. It may be cheaper to use a relatively small drone with a vertical launch and armed with several cumulative bombs with aerodynamic brakes.
  15. -1
    20 August 2019 17: 44
    Quote: Topgun
    range, it’s written in the article about spike and 25 km, there are no problems with range, just to shoot further you need more rockets (more fuel, more lenses and matrixes to see further, etc.), javelin (today this is the standard - a very successfully made set ) was originally designed for a certain range, because weight is also important for soldiers !!!!!!!!! you can make them drag rockets of 30-50kg that will hit 10-30km and what's the point? real battle he is near !!!!!!!!! and how many of these banduras can soldiers take with them? once again, you want a range - see a long-range spike (at 25 km) but the Israelis do not carry it in their hands, and the installation is on jeeps :)))
    so what about range myth
    Now about the capture: that is, all those "tripods" of the 2nd generation complexes that are placed on the hills !!!!! do not need to install? don't you risk your life? I'm already silent about the fact that most of them do not have remote control (nonsense) and you need to stand at the "machine" while the rocket flies to the whole world showing yourself shining with a laser, Is it safe? ... but the javelin operator should stick his neck out of the trench on a few tens of seconds without irradiating anything with a laser, press the button and dive into the trench are they kamikaze? There is no need to juggle, the complexes of the 3rd generation reduce the risks for their operators by orders of magnitude!

    You probably either didn’t read it to the end, or I didn’t put it clearly enough. Spike captures the target on the trajectory, then - on the test
  16. 0
    21 August 2019 01: 17
    Quote: English Tarantas
    how effective is getting into the roof of a tank when shooting from the front

    As effective as possible from any direction. 100% penetration of the armor, and taking into account the large power of the ATG data, the jet will fly deep.

    What breaks is understandable. Question in action for the reservation. For the same Javelina, the angle is set under the AZ of our tanks. Without it, the jet and the fragments will go to the bottom of the hull, without really hitting anything.
    With an impact core, for example, TOW-2B is already more interesting, but the question is how powerful a fragmentation field gives an impact core when it hits the roof of a tower and how wide the angle of expansion. But here the presence or absence of the ability to shift the estimated point of detonation before launch will affect the effectiveness. If it is, the characteristics of the armor action are not so significant.
  17. 0
    22 August 2019 17: 17
    What prevents a missile of a second-generation complex from being launched from one place and induced from another?
    1. 0
      25 August 2019 13: 10
      Maybe, but depending on which guidance method. In the case of guidance over the wire - no.
      For complexes of the second generation, with a beam receiver in the tail - no.
      Only for laser aimed at the spot target on the seeker.
      And in this case, the operator still impersonates himself with laser radiation.
  18. 0
    25 August 2019 12: 35
    An inaccuracy can immediately be noted: on the Javelin, a THERMAL VISION GOS is installed, which remembers the image of the target and is aimed only at it. And not just a heat source, which would make it possible to use LTC.
    Next, about the cost. The “let it go” principle provides greater flexibility of use, less chance of counteraction to the target (laser radiation is detected by defense systems) in the form of return fire and curtains. And the increased cost (3 times) does not play a big role, against the background of the cost of MBT - any of them is much more expensive.
    And for the “rich” armies of developed countries, of course, the 3rd generation ATGM will be priority.
  19. 0
    April 20 2022 22: 01
    After all this, the main thing is that our tankers should always be reliably and reliably covered by the KAZ "Arena" and similar systems. In general, whatever one may say - a cunning series of shots from an RPG-7 in 90 cases out of 100 - will destroy any armored vehicles.
  20. 0
    10 June 2023 11: 01
    There was information about the development in Russia of the 3rd generation Avtonomiya ATGM, our analogue of the American FGM-148 Javelin ATGM. But it is not known at what stage the work on this ATGM is at the moment.




    There is also information that the Hermes ATGM is a 3rd generation ATGM. And it is used during the NWO in Ukraine. ATGM "Hermes" was created in several versions, for ground and aviation equipment.
    ATGM "Hermes" in the version for the Ka-52 helicopter.