Frigate "Admiral of the Fleet Kasatonov" will go on state tests in September

The first serial frigate of project 22350 Admiral fleet Kasatonov "will go to state tests in September this year and will be included in the Russian fleet before the end of the year. This was reported by the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry.


Frigate "Admiral of the Fleet Kasatonov" will go on state tests in September


The military department said that at present the frigate is completing the stage of factory sea trials and within a week it will go to the ranges of the Baltic Sea, where a number of ship systems with which the ship is equipped will be checked. In September, the ship will begin the phase of state testing.

Within a week, the newest frigate of the 22350 project “Admiral of the Fleet of Kasatonov” will be released to work out the final stage of factory sea trials in designated ranges of the Baltic Sea. In September, the frigate will begin state tests

- it is spoken in the message of the Ministry of Defense.

The frigate “Admiral Kasatonov” is the second ship of the 22350 project and the first serial ship after the lead frigate “Admiral Gorshkov”. The displacement of 5 is thousands of tons with a length of 135 m and a width of 16 m. The frigate is able to go 4500 miles, thus developing speed to 29 nodes. The autonomy of swimming is 30 days. Crew - from 170 people.

Main power plant: gas turbine engine with a total capacity of 65 thousand liters. pp., diesel generators with a total capacity of 4 thousand kW.

The frigate is armed with: the 130-mm A-192 artillery mount, the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system; launchers for 16 anti-ship missiles "Onyx" or "Caliber", anti-submarine complex "Package", anti-submarine helicopter Ka-27.
Photos used:
"Northern shipyard"
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexey RA 13 August 2019 17: 59 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    Great discussion about the difference between head и first serial I foresee ...
    1. dvina71 13 August 2019 18: 01 New
      • 4
      • 4
      0
      Scha .. donated will catch up and start ..
    2. yehat 13 August 2019 18: 02 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Alexey RA
      I have a big discussion about the difference between the lead and the first production one ...

      ... my young Padawan, the dark side of the power hides the difference of these ships
  2. Proxima 13 August 2019 18: 00 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    Thank! Good news! If we had more hard-working ships, ships-workhorses!
    1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 31 New
      • 11
      • 7
      +4
      People like you are interesting, you always write such comments here. Do you see value in such comments?
      1. Proxima 13 August 2019 18: 35 New
        • 7
        • 8
        -1
        What does "always write" mean? Take the trouble to open my comments and read. They are mostly pretty extensive. Or are you going to troll now? Most importantly, rate the value of your comment.
        1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 40 New
          • 10
          • 6
          +4
          Well, something like - there would be more of such workhorses .. such comments were already direct.
          There won't be more of them yet. These three are for now, then a break to the next potty, and then an even more awesome break to a half super pot, but I’m afraid I can’t wait for the 40 year old to start putting the super pot. So it’s kind of strange that brave speeches seem to be like - there are more such horses, with the understanding that this will not happen in the near future.
          1. newcomer 13 August 2019 18: 48 New
            • 7
            • 5
            +2
            what you attacked a person, writes what he wants, how he sees. and you, Ryde Master, what do you see, what is your vision, well, except for complaints and moaning? not only frigates of the 22350 series live Flrt. many interesting things will come out and become part of the Navy. and the hitch between the serial is explained a bit lower on the branch.
            1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 56 New
              • 5
              • 3
              +2
              Well, I suggest simpler constructive. Can anyone know when the third serial will be released for testing and what's with the engines for it. It would be more interesting to read than brave religions about anything.
              There are people tracking, it would be better if they wrote more often. Honestly, mine posts are even more meaningful.
              1. newcomer 13 August 2019 19: 46 New
                • 5
                • 2
                +3
                Ryle Master. Well, here’s a construct for you (I wonder if you really didn’t know?): Golovko and Isakov will be transferred to the Fleet at the end of the 22nd. Golovko will be built by 21, Isakov by 22gg.
                1. newcomer 13 August 2019 19: 57 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  Yes, I forgot. on energy_ the first production engines will be transferred for Golovko and Isakov by the end of this year
                  1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 20: 10 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Well, Golovko, then maybe next year to start running?
                2. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 13 August 2019 20: 16 New
                  • 29
                  • 1
                  +28
                  Quote: newbie
                  Golovko will be built for 21, Isakov for 22.

                  Not certainly in that way. What Shishkin writes about this: “Thanks to the information from VKontakte of the Ukrainian Zorya NPKG - Mashproekt, kindly provided by artemiyrussia’s colleague, one can try to predict the fate of Golovko and Isakov. Former (2000-2015) engineer Zori , and from 2016 of the Rybinsky UEC-Saturn, S. Panov, in discussion with his interlocutors, reports that in Russia “a ban has been imposed on the design of ships with a foreign power plant,” and that “the estimated delivery time [M55] for ships is the summer of 2020 of the year. ”And in more detail:“ as for the M55, then its ed the tractors are being tested at the Zvezda, gas turbine engines are ready. Reducers from Zvezda will arrive on Saturn probably in December, all this will be tested again and in the summer 2020 DGTA will be delivered to the ship. "It is impossible to mount a power plant afloat for the simple reason that it includes shaft shafts and propulsors ( propellers) - that’s why frigates will wait for DGTA on the slipway. In addition, it must be emphasized that: 1) installation of a power plant is not easy and very time-consuming; 2) Russian DGTAs, although slightly insignificant in terms of mounting technology, will differ from Russian-Ukrainian ones (in essentially it's bud (the first experience of their installation on a ship); 3) at the Severnaya Verf still have not regained their competencies, in other words, they have not learned how to work quickly. With this in mind, one can hardly expect the launch of Admiral Golovko in 2020 in In the best case, this will happen in the first half of the next 2021 year, and the transfer of the Navy ship (after completion and testing) - before the end of the 2022. As for Isakov, taking into account the announced expected interval between the delivery of the gas turbine engine (DGTA) for two orders in 3 − 6 months (I / II quarter 2019 g.), Its descent and transfer to the customer will take place in 2022 and 2023 gg. https://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/214435.html
                  On my own, I will add that this project has many problems, except for fine-tuning the Poliment-Redut anti-aircraft missile system, in particular, turbines for 22350 frigates were made in Rybinsk from the very beginning. Saturn made turbines, Kolomna made diesels, then it was sent to Zorya, who added her gearbox and gas generator, tested the assembly in its assembly and testing complex of gas turbine engines and units, and sent it to St. Petersburg. It was necessary to import not so much a turbine, but a Ukrainian gearbox, which is part of the DSTU. To date, they have made a turbine; an assembly and testing complex of gas turbine engines and units (gas turbine engines and gas turbine engines) for offshore programs has built the production of ship gas turbine engines. Now industry will have free hands. GEM for 22350 is only the beginning. By the way, such stands remained after the collapse of the Union only in Ukraine at Zorya-Mashproekt. The gearbox is ready; in 2020, you can assemble a turbine, diesel engine and gearbox at the stand. Tests of PO55 gearboxes for power plants of frigates of 22350 Ave. at the Zvezda plant, St. Petersburg (photo without date from S. Panov via artemiyrussia)
                  1. abc_alex 13 August 2019 20: 36 New
                    • 11
                    • 0
                    +11
                    Wow! Respect, master. For the sake of such posts, you should go to this forum.
                    1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 23: 24 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      I support. What I hinted at.
                  2. newcomer 13 August 2019 21: 08 New
                    • 5
                    • 1
                    +4
                    Aristarkh Ludwigovich, you are on top. the fact of gathering engineers at our facilities is especially pleasant. in the hall a shift of 6/7 months is such a project, with all the difficulties that we know, it’s not terrible. the launch of our gas turbine engines will greatly facilitate further construction.
                    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 13 August 2019 21: 15 New
                      • 13
                      • 0
                      +13
                      Quote: abc_alex
                      Respect

                      Quote: newbie
                      on high

                      Thanks comrades hi The development and establishment of production with the rejection of cooperation with Zorya-Mashproekt is a non-acidic task, comparable to the development of new products. But there is a major movement, Russia needs a Fleet. I analyze for myself in other sectors, the amount of property that was returned under state control in recent years is huge - according to various estimates, up to 70-80% of production was returned.
                      1. Artemiy_2 13 August 2019 22: 07 New
                        • 6
                        • 0
                        +6
                        I noticed this comment when I scoured the info about gearboxes. Then he informed Shishkin and he wrote an article. So said made his small role in informing the public.
                        PS
                        Now we are designing a gearbox for frigate 22350M with a VI of 7000 tons.
                  3. bessonov932 13 August 2019 23: 15 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Figase! Here is the text. Thank!
      2. alystan 13 August 2019 18: 55 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Dear Anatoly,
        your first sentence (admiration + desire to continue in the same vein) contradicts the second (question-doubt).
        No offense, but you need to deal with the spelling of the words "write" and "write."
        I myself am not Russian by nationality, but I know this difference, thanks to my teachers.
        1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 19: 31 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          Where you saw admiration I don’t understand.
          I wonder what kind of people are so simple.
          Let me write on every news - excellent! More in the operation of such ships, you give the revival of the Russian fleet!
          The resource will become just super informative and interesting.
          I know Russian well, unfortunately it’s a habit on forums to not especially follow the spelling.
          1. Bookcase 13 August 2019 19: 37 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            If anyone has a better mood, this is no longer a useless comment. Positive in our time is a necessary and healthy thing. :-)
            1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 19: 41 New
              • 5
              • 1
              +4
              For some reason, it seems to me that there are at least random people here, and everyone knows how things are with shock boxes.
              I’m not against the positive, they will accept it will be great, even so.
              I do not understand this phrase, already familiar here, would be more such horses. Not at all positive if you know how it really is. More like sarcasm.
              1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 13 August 2019 20: 03 New
                • 7
                • 1
                +6
                Quote: RideMaster
                For some reason, it seems to me that there are at least random people here, and everyone knows how things are with shock boxes.

                Here sir, you are mistaken. In the news section, mainly emotions, pluses, likes. Look for really interesting comments in the weapons section.
          2. alystan 13 August 2019 19: 56 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Anatoly, I wrote "no offense", which means that I really did not have such intentions.
            Well, and about the correct spelling of these words: the question is not in the spelling as such, but in the complete distortion of the meaning invested.
            Delight? And here it is - "Interesting people like you ...". In fairness, it could be interpreted as a mockery. But the continuation of the same sentence "you always write such comments", I personally understand how some kind of request / desire to continue to write in the same spirit.
            And the “mistake” is only in one letter, which I pointed out.
            1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 20: 11 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              As for the letter I understood, I will try not to miss such errors)
  3. Pirogov 13 August 2019 18: 01 New
    • 6
    • 8
    -2
    Knowing the epic with Gorshkov, one hardly believes that Kasatonov will be included in the fleet by the end of the year.
    1. Artemiy_2 13 August 2019 18: 32 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      What relation do Goroshkov’s problems have to Kasatonov?
    2. Gray brother 13 August 2019 19: 02 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Pirogov
      Knowing the epic with Gorshkov, I somehow don't believe much

      You have strange cause and effect relationships. You have something to worry about.
      1. Pirogov 14 August 2019 22: 02 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Gray Brother
        You have strange cause and effect relationships. You have something to worry about.

        Tell me how many Gorshkov were brought into the fleet? This is your normal and remove the cap will finally be useful to you ...
  4. newcomer 13 August 2019 18: 08 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    what to say _ handsome. good luck on the state. tests. after the fabulous completion of the story with Polement Redoubt on Gorshkov, with Kasatonov, everything will go fine, normally.
  5. Palomnik 13 August 2019 18: 21 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    The first serial frigate of project 22350 "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kasatonov"

    With such a formidable name, he should show himself in the oceans .. Seven feet under the keel!
    Our fleet will be no worse than in the USSR! I really hope so.
  6. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 29 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    And with the fourth, as I understand it, a break is planned.
    I wonder when the superpowers will start laying.
    1. Artemiy_2 13 August 2019 18: 31 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      When there will be those design and documentation. Now work on them is in full swing.
  7. Valerik1337 13 August 2019 18: 30 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    Russia is the mistress of the seas
    1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 41 New
      • 9
      • 2
      +7
      Alas, while the Caspian except.
      1. Sky strike fighter 13 August 2019 18: 50 New
        • 3
        • 9
        -6
        Pull up geography, Russia has access to a dozen seas. Not only the Caspian. And quite able to rely on the shore, aviation and navy to control them all in full, with the exception of the Baltic Sea.
        1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 57 New
          • 6
          • 1
          +5
          I'm about the mistress, and not what you went on to do.
        2. Greenwood 14 August 2019 04: 29 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          And quite able to rely on the shore, aviation and navy to control them all in full
          What about Japanese?
  8. K-50 13 August 2019 18: 38 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    It is a pity they refused the AK-130. Powerful "thing" was. sad
    1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 49 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      In modern warfare, I think the ships will not come together this way. It’s even easier to beat the enemy with zurams on the other side, even if they miraculously spent all their PCRs without hitting each other.
  9. RideMaster 13 August 2019 18: 47 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    By the way, why are there many rods in calibers. For me, all these ships should be pulled by onyxes. 8 or 16 calibers with more or less air defense is even worse than 68 Tomahawks in Syria.
    Nevertheless, the main task of the ship is to create a swarm of at least 16 onyxes to break through the enemy ships.
    1. Dart2027 13 August 2019 19: 35 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: RideMaster
      For me, all of these ships should pull onyx

      They can use them, just the complex as a whole is called Caliber.
      1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 19: 42 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Onyx is not even a caliber nearby.
        1. Dart2027 13 August 2019 19: 46 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: RideMaster
          Onyx is not even a caliber nearby

          Again. The complex, which was called Caliber, can use both Caliber family missiles and Onyx missiles. What are you unhappy with?
          1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 20: 13 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Onyx is simply not part of the caliber complex. This is a separate rocket. Installation on the ship is also not called a caliber.
            1. abc_alex 13 August 2019 20: 44 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              The installation is called UKSK 3S14. It is standardized for missiles of the Caliber and Onyx complex.
              1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 23: 27 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                Sorry for the tedious, I hinted to a friend that onyx is not a complex caliber. I don’t know why he insists.
                1. abc_alex 14 August 2019 07: 27 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  I see ...
            2. bayard 13 August 2019 23: 27 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              The Caliber missile family includes surface-to-surface \ ship-to-surface missiles, anti-ship missiles with a supersonic warhead \ second stage, anti-submarine missile torpedo.
              UKSK 3С14 is unified both under the Caliber family, and under the Onyx missile, and in the long term also Zircon missiles.
              And it’s not a fact that in a real combat situation the Onyx will be more effective, and not the Caliber with a supersonic warhead. By secrecy of approaching the enemy’s ship, the low-altitude Caliber will give odds to the high-altitude supersonic Onyx with which the US Navy air defense is quite capable of handling.
  10. Sapsan136 13 August 2019 18: 55 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    Good, but with such a pace of renewal, the Russian fleet will soon be left without it
  11. Observer2014 13 August 2019 19: 25 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Few of these ships. Very few. For the defense of the country there are at least 20 of them on the country's pyramid.
    1. RideMaster 13 August 2019 19: 36 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      For defense, a super pot would be good. These at least have a chance to break through air defense orders alone with 48 onyxes and at least damage the aircraft carrier well. Of course, in conjunction with aviation, to guide. 16 onyxes ... well, in a good situation, if without an avik, this one can dump a couple of burks, or a couple of tickendirogs.
      And given that it is unclear for which show-offs they still mostly drag in calibers, it is still sadder.
      1. bayard 13 August 2019 23: 43 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        What a task, such ammunition is being dragged.
        It's a frigate, not a cruiser, with such a displacement you can’t take it anymore. And the tasks of the frigate will still be limited by its capabilities.
        And if you need to strike at AUG with a good warrant, then you can detach an underwater cruiser for this task - the modernized Antey Ave. 949A with 72 KR Caliber, Onyx or Zircon, taking into account which of your torpedo tubes devices, he will be able to launch another order of 12 pcs. KR "Caliber" (with a supersonic warhead). And to cover the Antey from enemy anti-submarine aircraft, one or two 22350 frigates can be detached. In total, we get 104 - 116 KR in the salvo.
        Enough of this outfit for AUG?
        It seems to me - more than.
  12. AREOPAG23 13 August 2019 23: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Please explain what, after all, does he have a full displacement? Previously wrote 4.500, on Wikipedia 5400, in article 5000?
  13. musorg 14 August 2019 12: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    On the water since 2015 somehow a bit too much.