Rockefeller and Rothschild "Big Game" - in the light and in the shadow
30 May 2012 has revealed information about an agreement whereby the Rothshild Investment Trust “Capital Partners” (“RIT“ CP ”) owned by the Rothschilds acquired a large stake in Rockefeller Financial services (“ RFS ”) running the Rockefeller family business and other wealthy US families. Placed by almost all the leading world and Russian media, it was accompanied by similar and superficial comments, the essence of which was that the two largest clans of global oligarchs formed an alliance for “joint resistance to a new round of the global crisis”. In fact, there is nothing more distant from reality than such statements.
The fact is that the strategies of both oligarchic groups in recent years have been built on the principle formulated by Rothschild biographer Frederick Morton: “Today, the family seeks to make its presence in the world invisible and inaudible.” This is understandable: they prefer big and, especially, very big money silence. But it was precisely this silence that broke on May 30 with the attention that was riveted to the event, which clearly demonstrated the real weight of these leading clans not only in the global economy, but also in global politics. In our opinion, commenting on the emergence of a new “alliance”, financial analysts, apparently, simply confused the cause with the effect: the global crisis itself was a product of the activities of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, and not vice versa. How exactly this happened, we will try to figure it out now. So, in short, what happened means, perhaps, not the surrender of the Rockefellers to the Rothschilds, but, at the very least, a very substantial surrender of their positions. If you dig deep, you need a detailed analysis with historical an excursion - otherwise it will be almost impossible to understand something in this scenario.
Therefore, we start with the background of the question:
The real knot of contradictions between these two global clans are the two world wars of the 20th century. Moreover, in both cases they were unleashed by the Rockefellers, and it was they who reaped the rewards of success. When it became clear that France and Britain could not cope with Germany, and because of the February Revolution, Russia dropped out of the war, the Rockefellers set the Standard Oil of New Jersey to allow the oil empire to develop. Rothschildam oil wealth of the Middle East. Since 1927, Standard Oil has taken over 25% of IPC shares - the Iraqi Oil Company, which was established in 1912, under the name TPC - Turkish Oil Company. At the same time, 50% of the shares were then transferred to the ownership of the government of the Ottoman Empire, according to 25%, they received Rothschild's Shell, as well as Deutsche Bank, which got into their clip a bit later. Unlike their temporary partners (who, most likely, had no idea that they were temporary), the British “knew the future” - because they themselves had planned it, realizing that after the collapse of Germany and the Ottoman Empire in World War I, as winners, take away all 100%. It would have happened if the Entente could defeat the Germans on the battlefield. But for the European allies, this task turned out to be daunting, and US assistance was needed - General Pershing's expeditionary corps, who decided the outcome of the war on the western front (which, unlike the Second World War, was then decisive). The entry of the United States into the war in order to induce the British to fulfill the conditions set by them was imposed on the American government in a variety of ways. First of all, with the help of "backstage" pushing to the provocative acts of "underwater" war, widely used by Germany itself. The Germans did not want, and could not, because of financial dependence on the Rockefellers: in 1914-1916, they provided large loans for not only the Kaiser, but also his Ottoman allies, having received a shadow influence on their policies. The decisive reason for the US to withdraw from neutrality and to enter the war was the drowning of the German submarine Lusitania passenger transport, the preparation of which by backstage diplomatic maneuvers very much resembled the threshold of the Japanese attack in December 1941 on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor. Then after the next meeting with F.D. Roosevelt, US Secretary of War Stimson wrote in his diary: "We have touched on the sensitive issue of diplomatic actions to ensure that Japan takes the first and erroneous step - the step of undisguised aggression." It is not a special secret that both events have the same roots.
We can not say that the Rothschilds did not interfere with all this. Their main and hereditary political creature in the United States, Colonel House, who called himself “the power behind the throne,” devoted the whole 1914 to the year trying to put together a Western alliance against Russia with the participation of the United States, Great Britain, France and Germany. “England would not want to completely crush Germany, because then it would face one-on-one with its old enemy, Russia,” House wrote to President W. Wilson in May 1914 of the year, “but if Germany infinitely increases its fleet, England’s there will be no choice. ” In order to preserve the right of choice for England (and the Rothschilds, who for a hundred years already controlled its central bank), House even made a voyage to Berlin, where he received an audience with Kaiser Wilhelm II and Minister of the Sea von Tirpitz. All is in vain: the German fleet, with the Rockefellers' money (compensated, by the way, by the Federal Reserve Act by the American treasury), grew by leaps and bounds and the British could not stay away from the war, thus transferring all political trumps to the Rockefellers.
In World War II, the economy became even more dependent on politics. When the Germans attacked France in May 1940, the French-British group was quickly defeated, the French signed a truce, surrendering Paris, and the British were pressed to the English Channel around the Belgian Dunkirk. Along with the “strange war” of the 1939-1940 fall-winter One of the main secrets of the Second World War, which baffled historians, was always the question: why did the Germans, instead of finishing off the enemy and cross the English Channel on his shoulders, got up and did not take a step forward until the British taken personnel to Br Tang Island. Moreover, the exported transports were not bombed.
A “casket” was opened very, very simply. The fact is that Hitler, if he wasn’t directly employed by the Rockefellers (although such an assertion is not excessive either), was completely dependent on them for the military economy and, above all, oil and products its processing, primarily gasoline. Facts and figures - from the creation of Basel Bank of International Settlements in 1930 for the purpose of financing the Nazis to Standard Oil in 1934, 730, thousands of acres of land near Hamburg and the construction of an oil refinery on them - abound. But we will not overload the material with them in order not to drown in details and particulars. And the people who brought Hitler to power were in the USA - the same brothers Allen and John Foster Dulles (Rockefeller brothers cousins). And all of them were led by a “three-headed” one, the American-British-German octopus — the Schroeder Bank (which had the status of an agent of the Nazi government), and also the firms associated with it (the current G. Schroeder — the offspring of those Shreders). And Roosevelt, who with the help of the same House, was brought to power by the Rothschilds, in fact turned out to be the creature of the Rockefellers. It is not by chance that House himself surrounded by the new president was replaced by B. Baruch, a large exchange speculator (like Soros), who significantly improved his affairs as chairman of the US military industry committee, which he occupied throughout World War I.
A small touch: when the US intelligence services in 1943 reported to Roosevelt about the possibility of “removing Hitler,” he categorically forbade it. But they tried to do it, but in July 1944, the British. Having concluded a truce with the "new" German government, they very much hoped to draw the US into the confrontation with the USSR and destroy the planned Soviet-American alliance. (It was, however, destroyed, but in a different way: instead of the chief architect of the New Deal, G. Wallace, the Rothschild's G. Truman's creature was extremely “timely" brought to the White House, who, shortly before Roosevelt's death, became vice-president, and then the president of the United States). On all of this, Hitler clearly followed all the instructions of the Rockefellers. And the instructions in May 1940, he received the following:
- Do not touch the English in Dunkirk;
- not to cross the English Channel and generally leave Britain alone, turning the preparations for Operation Sea Lion (the invasion of the British Isles);
- to deploy its efforts in the direction of the “plan of Barbarossa” - preparation for an attack on the USSR.
Hitler executed these instructions punctually. But why did he even get them? But because Churchill, on the verge of collapse in the situation with Dunkirk (reminded him and the British public of the nightmare of the failure of the British Dardanelles operation fleet, on which he, as the First Lord of the Admiralty, then insisted), agreed to fulfill all the conditions that Roosevelt put forward to him (by the way, they were cousins) in exchange for US defense and military assistance. Namely:
- transfer to the Americans the oil “pearl” of the British Empire - Saudi Arabia (which the British intelligence and, for example, TE Lawrence of Arabia, literally “plowed out” for the crown, literally plowed out the Ottoman Empire) for the crown;
- withdraw all British capital from the United States and sell all property held by the British in the United States to the Americans;
- after the end of the war - to dissolve the British Empire, giving independence to the colonies (began, as we remember, from India - 1947 g .; for the British colonial empire, the rest of the "Rothschild empire" - the French, Dutch and Belgian crumbled to 1960).
Thus, - many experts (primarily Western ones) involved in global history and politics talk about this - the main reason for the two world wars was nothing but the seizure of the Eurasian oil assets from the Rothschilds and the Rockefeller consolidation. That is why Germany was twice set against Britain (Hitler, like the Kaiser, the Rockefellers regularly financed the whole war). Roosevelt’s new “alignment” in 1944 personally dictated to the Halifax ambassador of Britain to the States (the same bailiff of the “Munich conspiracy”, who had successfully negotiated with Hitler in November 1937): Saudi Arabia - America, Iran - Britain, and Iraq and K We will “milk” together. Having yielded, moreover, twice, to brute force and circumstances, the Rothschilds of the "insults" inflicted by them did not forget and did not forgive.
The hot war ended and the cold war began.
If the Rockefellers are primarily an "oil" dynasty, then for the Rothschilds the main thing is "gold" and other precious metals. These are their main spheres of influence and control. Therefore, the Rothschilds began by digging under the dollar, aiming to replace it with gold (we admit that from this point of view, the “decoupling” of the dollar from gold backing, carried out by R. Nixon in 1971, looks somewhat different than we are used to). The main lever for this is the price of gold. It is established not by market, but by directive. Since the mid-1940s, every day, without breaks on weekends and holidays, twice a day, the London Association of the Precious Metals Market has held the so-called "fixings", in which five banks participate: the parent bank of the British branch of the Rothschilds "NM Rothshild & Sons", close to their French branch "Societe Generale" (we still need it), commemorated from the "Turkish-Iraqi" deal of 1910-1920s "Deutsche Bank", the Chinese "branch" of the Rothschilds - the global bank Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp . " ("HSBC"), who grew up in the 2004th century on the drug trade, and also the world leader in the circulation of gold and precious metals "ScotiaMocatta" - a division of "Scotiabank Global Banking & Markets". These fixings are carried out, of course, at the NM Rothshild & Sons site and, moreover, it was this bank that invariably presided over them until 10 (and then pharisaically “went into the shadows”). We will not list all the vicissitudes of the unfolding inter-clan struggle. We only note that over the past decade, gold has risen in price more than 1980 times, and the dollar is weakening due to the exorbitant US national debt, the creation of which in the early 1995s the Rothschilds again brought this country - with the help of the famous "Reaganomics", that is, inflation of "financial bubbles". And what, one wonders, still had to do for Reagan when the commission he created, headed by the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve P. Walker (a protege of the same Rothschilds) "found out" that in Fort Knox (the US gold reserve) there is not a single gram of the American state gold - only foreign and private. It was necessary to somehow finance the "Strategic Defense Initiative" and other innovations in the arms race, which, as it were, "accidentally" fell for the Brezhnev and Andropov leadership of the USSR. So Reagan began to inflate "soap bubbles", building with their help "Potemkin villages" and "castles in the air." It was then that the US had a national debt. The United States would have come to its "handle" much faster than it is now, by about XNUMX, but it was very lucky with the collapse of the USSR, which the Rothschilds were already preparing with the help of communications in our country. Without going into special details (another topic), let us single out only the main persons involved in this chain: Beria - Kuusinen (the connection of the Comintern with Freemasonry) - Andropov - Gorbachev; besides them, Mikoyan and Kosygin got into this chain (and by no means on the sidelines).
The Rockefellers were not particularly interested in the collapse of the USSR.
Moreover, for them the Soviet Union was a counterweight to the Rothschilds. The Rockefellers equally supported both the Nazis and Soviet industrialization. Unlike them from the eternal rivals of the Rothschilds, they needed a balance of “brilliant isolation” not governed by London, but a united Eurasia with all its oil. Potential leaders of the continent, in view of the presence of passionate ideologies (albeit opposed), they saw both Hitler and Stalin, whoever won, but only with their own indispensable control (this required bringing both countries into an internecine war challenge the USA). In addition, having received a concession share of Baku oil at the end of 1920, the Rockefellers, already with Hitler’s hands, tried to finally take it into ownership, having calculated, however, on this at Stalingrad. (The “economic” nature of the 1942 military campaign, in contrast to 1941, when the political centers of the USSR became the target of the Wehrmacht’s attack, indicate many modern specialists, including German ones). Beating his unexpected "fellow travelers", I.V. Stalin in 1945 year became an independent figure of global scale. Unknown, unlike the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the Molotov-Hiss Pact, concluded in 1944-1945. At the United Nations Conferences in Dumbarton Oaks and San Francisco, and sponsored by the future governor of New York and the vice president of the United States, Nelson Rockefeller, was an unpleasant surprise for the American political establishment. From now on, he shouldn’t have to poke his nose into the affairs of the peoples of the USSR and the countries of Eastern Europe, as well as Moscow, in “British” Iran and “American” Saudi Arabia. (At the time of Hiss’s McCarthyism on the denunciation of one of the novice members of the commission on anti-American activity R. Nixon was even convicted of “spying for the USSR” - that's how annoyed!). The situation, unfortunately, has radically changed after the death of the leader. Strengthened in power as a result of the five-year period of “palace coups” (1953-1958), Khrushchev, being a Trotskyist, “exposed” the notorious “personality cult” and with the help of Mikoyan turned to the Rothschilds. With little that Brezhnev who understood these layouts, Kosygin, and especially Andropov, gained strength. Not having time to realize his destructive “European project” in life, the all-powerful KGB chief “spawned” Gorbachev, who launched this project before being elected general secretary, concluding a number of secret agreements on redistributing spheres of influence in Europe with the heir to the “Austro-Hungarian throne” in 1984 Otto von Habsburg. That is, on the one hand, the Rockefellers could not rely on the Gorbachev USSR to withstand the pressure of the Rothschilds. And, on the other hand, by the end of the 1980-ies, due to the accumulated public debt, there was a threat of the collapse of their patrimony - the United States. And the Rockefellers turned into the path of least resistance: they joined the collapse of the USSR together with the Rothschilds: the final consensus on this issue was reached in 1989, at a closed meeting of “influential people” (annual Bilderberg Conference) held on the Spanish island of La Toja. (Ibid, despite the desperate resistance of M.
With the help of the collapse of the USSR and at our expense, the Americans managed to close many “holes” in their economy and finances. The figures of how much and what exactly was taken out of our country by the 1995 year, October 24 1995, at a closed meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US military, named B. Clinton (they were very impressive at the beginning of the 2000) ). At the same time - we must pay tribute to the Rockefellers - they prevented the collapse of the Russian Federation, including with the help of Yeltsin (who, unlike Gorbachev, spoke in favor of the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation). And not only Yeltsin. What was looted in the former USSR was enough for America for twenty years.
And again, the national debt overcame, and again the States - “at the last line” (14 trillion dollars of total debt is not one annual budget). What should the Rockefellers do if the United States does not? Brzezinski, in his new book, Strategic Vision: America and the Global Power Crisis (saw the light of 2012 in February), explicitly writes that the United States today resembles the USSR before its collapse and is considering two options for global development, with or without American leadership that is, if you call a spade a spade, without the United States. In addition to the crisis in the eurozone, the massive exodus from Wall Street of top managers of large financial companies and corporations, which began in the spring of 2012, strains the global situation. (These “cadres” in the financial space and on banking areas are well oriented both day and night: they know when, where and what it smells like and where, with what smell and how quickly to run). Just in case, the Rockefellers today are buying up land in Argentina and Chile. But throwing a white flag (or a towel on the ropes) seems to be considered premature. The Rothschilds, in turn, are pressing.
F. Hollande in France - their creature.
A. Merkel is now in loneliness in the European Union and in deep defense within the country. Oriented to Britain, according to V.D. Yezhov (the Soviet biographer Adenauer), the Social Democrats "take" one federal land after another (recently, symbolically important municipal elections in North Rhine - Westphalia won). New Rockefeller "exceptions" in the form of Schroeder number XXUMX in the SPD is not expected. The parliamentary elections in Germany, meanwhile, are already in the 2 year, and the victory of the SPD will mean the consolidation of the entire Eurozone by the Rothschilds. And then instead of the “European state” built by the Rockefellers since Hitler's time, the EU will turn into a mosaic divided into municipalities - chaos, which, if anything, unites, it is devoid of any national and religious identity (and therefore completely suits the Rothschilds) “zone free trade. " And in this chaos they will drag in (they are already drawing in!) The CIS and Russia, starting with Ukraine, Moldova and the Baltic states, where chaos, in fact, already rules the ball. In the US, B. Obama is the creator of the Rothschilds: in June 2013, the boss of the Democratic Party was represented by none other than J. Soros - the closest associate of the Rothschilds. In Russia, the Rothschilds control the "family" that had fallen to their side under Yeltsin-President; Voloshin plays a key role in promoting her political interests. They also have a common business with the oligarch Deripaska, and through him - with the creatures of Chubais - the oligarchs Potanin and Prokhorov (it is from here that both the legs and the horns of all the "orange", "snow" and "swamp" street protests grow in Moscow). Chubais is the most cunning of all: he has connections with the Rothschilds (through former US Treasury Secretary L. Summers, who heads the National Economic Council in America), and with the Rockefellers - he is a member of the board of directors of the global bank JP Morgan Chase. The goal is simple and clear: in any case, stay afloat - and in fact “floats”, “does not sink”!
Especially important for the Rothschilds China. If the Chinese elite succeeds in “crushing” (and, judging by the split that began in connection with the “Bo Xilai case”, this unfortunately began to turn out), the Rothschilds will be able to “hook” gold on the yuan. And carefully build it into the status of a new global reserve currency, secured not with oil, like a dollar, but with gold (for this, gold is inflated in price). If this number passes, then soon the dollar and the US themselves can be brought down (about which, unfortunately, many people have long and naively been dreaming of us as something very positive).
For what?
To create the “North American Union” with the new Amerеро currency, and then the “Transatlantic Union”, in which North America, in full accordance with the “global plan” of the Club of Rome, would unite with Europe, and the Amero with the euro. And a “real” world currency would have turned out: a pound sterling, probably — what else? (This Atlantic Transformation project is provided for by the Texas Agreements, which in March 2005 were concluded by the top officials of the NAFTA member states - the North American Free Trade Area). But this “shift” - from dollar to pound (presumably) - needs a “stabilizer”. According to the Rothschilds plan, they should be the yuan, backed by gold (the price of which the Rothschilds, as we have seen, are set by themselves), as well as backed up by the military and political power of the PRC. By the way, against the background of the union, and more precisely the purchase of the Rothschild Rockefellers, China and Japan with 1 June came out of mutual dollar calculations, and will now be calculated strictly in yuan and yen. This tale, however, for naive simpletons. The yuan and the yen are brought to a common denominator only through an equivalent (EMC is a single measure of value). Previously, this equivalent was the dollar (it is controlled by the Rockefellers). And now?
Since it does not say what it is, it means that the role of the EMC goes to gold. And this gold equivalent (standard), from the price of which mutual Chinese-Japanese calculations will make a start, will already be controlled by the Rothschilds. That is, "sly" China and Japan imposed the immediate prospect of a change of global financial power. In other words, the Rockefellers "passed" another milestone. And after that, apparently, they requested a truce. It is a truce, not the world. Similarly, the Rothschilds in the 1917 and 1940 years asked the Rockefellers for a "truce" in the inter-clan struggle (and for American military aid to Britain against Germany). Debt, as they say, is beautiful!
The Rothschilds now, like the Rockefellers then, kindly agreed. This is the inner meaning of the “historic” agreement from 30 of May 2012. With the background we have completed. We turn to the essence of the agreement. So, the business component of the Rothschild-Rockefeller Alliance looks like this: the aforementioned RIT “CP” group, headed by Jacob (Jacob) Rothschild, bought 37% of RFS shares. Immediately, a very piquant detail comes out: under the control of Rothschild's “buyers,” there are only 3 billion dollars, and under the control of Rockefeller's “purchased” - 34 billion (just a little less than 40 billion).
How so?
However, everything falls into place when we recall that this share in 37% was previously owned by the French bank Societe Generale - that same member of the London gold fixings. But in the 2008 year, when this bank bought Rockefeller’s aforesaid share, it had assets worth 71 billion dollars under management - 2 times more than what it bought. And now these 37% from the giant have passed to the dwarf, which, it turns out, owns the assets of another giant.
What does all this mean?
First of all, the fact that the Rockefellers actually requested a "truce" back in 2008. But then, apparently, it was decided to "suppress" them once more, which resulted in the Sino-Japanese agreement on mutual settlements. So by 2012, the Rockefellers' position deteriorated even more. But why does Jacob Rothschild's company have only $ 3 billion, when the family's fortune is estimated at least on a scale of 2 to 20 trillion, and some "hotheads" even call the figure of 300 trillion? (Here it is necessary to make a reservation that the famous Forbes list, which shows us the upper bar of personal fortunes at the level of $ 64 billion, does not take into account the main thing - collective, family capital, in fact, hiding them, which, apparently, is intended). The very same "case of 3 billion" is in the internal alignment of the Rothschilds. The group initially had five branches, then their number was reduced, and, ultimately, two remained - British and French (more precisely, Franco-Swiss). They did not quarrel with each other, but they were not particularly friendly - they sluggishly competed against the background of the Rockefeller leadership. In 1980, a split occurred in the British branch. And Jacob Rothschild was expelled from the family by Evelyn de Rothschild - with the ban on the use of the name "Rothschild" in the names of his firms. The opal was softened in 1988, and in 2004, when Evelyn handed over the management of the family business to a representative of the French branch, David de Rothschild, Jacob was fully exonerated. It follows from this that Jacob is, in fact, the "agent of influence" of the French Rothschilds among the British. That is why he was subjected to exile, restoring his rights only when the process of official unification of the two branches began. (And this process ended in March-April 2012, when the French and British branches merged in Paris). From the discrepancy between Jacob Rothschild's 3 billion and the total capital of the group (which does not allow us to speak of participation in the Rothschild deal specifically as a group), it also follows that, in full accordance with the right of the winner, the Rothschilds included only a tiny part of their assets in the merged company, and the Rockefellers were taken away many highly profitable “cream” (Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, oil and gas concern Vallares, etc.). But it also follows from this that “to accept the surrender” of the first person of the Rockefellers - David (grandson of the founder of the dynasty) - sent the third-rate Rothschild - not the first or even the second in the intra-group hierarchy, who was also an outcast for a long time among “their own”.
This is in itself a humiliation, but it was not limited to them. To hurt Rockefeller even harder and more demonstratively:
- first, the deal was widely publicized, apparently, thus recording the fact of a request for a “truce” (which was not the case in 2008);
- secondly, they included in the terms of the agreement the right of the parties only to joint executive decisions and functions that will be taken by the general management company (in other words, the Rockefellers are no longer entitled to dispose of their own companies at home, in the US and in their “office” nor friendly assets);
- thirdly, even “tolerant” financial analysts (the ones that hang the public “noodles on the ears” about “uniting groups in dealing with the crisis”) recognize that the agreement leads to an expansion of the Rothschilds expansion in the US banking sector.
And what does it mean?
Of course, an impressive new step in revising the historical conditions for the sale of British assets in the US, delivered to 1940 by Roosevelt (that is, the Rockefellers) to his cousin Churchill (that is, the Rothschilds). This is about the same thing that the Germans did with the French in 1940, insisting on signing a humiliating for the French army truce in the same Compiegne forest and in the same headquarters car, where in November 1918, Field Marshal Foch accepted the actual surrender of the German command.
In fairness, we note that this revision began back in the 1980s, from the redistribution of the oil market in the United States (when British royal oil company British Petroleum climbed with "both feet", and not one but the United States in a particularly humiliating with the Saudis).
Does Rockefeller have a counterplay, and if so, which one?
There is a game, but in the business sector it will be difficult to realize it - due to the fact that it is difficult to withdraw assets from a common company: the Rockefellers themselves can no longer solve this issue, but they Well allow. Not to try!
Should their partners try to withdraw their assets?
But will they risk a direct challenge to the Rothschilds - that is the question. Than playing such dangerous games is easier (and more profitable) to throw the Rockefellers, having agreed with the new owners. And here we come to the fact that the truly serious defensive lines of the global clan in distress are not in the economy, but in politics, more precisely in geopolitics.
1. Elections in the United States. They will not only be presidential, since a significant part of the Senate and state governors will be subject to renewal in November 2012.
If the Rockefellers manage to get the Republican majority not only in the House of Representatives (as now), but also in the Senate, you can try to drive past 23 December 2012 of the year - when, formally, according to the Federal Reserve Law, the term of the 99-year lease from the Fed Reserve Print machine for the production of dollars from the US state. Here, after all, what is the important nuance? When such joint steps are taken as the creation of the Fed on 99 years (in 1913 year) - and the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers did it together, always, in addition to the laws, tacitly "gentlemen's" agreements are concluded. Of course, it is possible to break them, but this will be “not comme il faut”, that is why they are so risky to be reputed only in extreme cases. We dare to assume that in this case such agreements were also concluded - and it was for 99 years. Their most probable meaning is that before this period expires, under no circumstances should you “tear off the blanket” and not make any sudden movements. That is, the hands of those and others will finally be untied only after 23 December 2012 of the year - then we will see “who is whoo” (as Mr. Gorbachev said). The Fed is now controlled not by the Rothschilds, but by the Rockefellers. Therefore, the Rothschilds can be profitable to bring it down, to move from dollar to gold (and yuan), creating the conditions for launching the process of “reformatting” North America with the US incorporating into the “North American” and further into the “Transatlantic” alliances.
But the Rockefellers in their time (in 1927 year) realized what kind of mine in the form of the Fed they laid under the United States. And, possessing undivided control over the White House and Congress, they amended the Federal Reserve Law so as to deprive the printing press of the Fed not strictly at a certain time, but when Congress decides. (The Rothschilds, who apparently decided that by the same token tacit agreements were violated, responded to the Great Depression and the victory of Democrat Roosevelt over Republican Hoover, which, however, as we have already noted, turned out to be Pyrrhic). Thus, the mere preservation of Obama in the White House is necessary for the Rothschilds, but not sufficient to derail the dollar. Moreover, Obama is likely to be needed only at the last stage: to “skip” without vetoing Congress’s decision to revoke the right to rent a printing press from the Fed (which the Republican president would most likely use). But in order to adopt such a law and send it to Obama for signature, you need to have a majority in both houses of Congress. And if after the elections in November 2012 of the year it turns out to be from the Republicans (who are divided between the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds), it will be problematic to make a decision to revoke the lease. It is significant: those Republicans who, like Ron Paul, were quick to raise the issue of revoking the right to rent from the Fed already during the current presidential campaign, got off the electoral distance very quickly - this means that Rockefeller supporters now rule the republican camp . So we are waiting from November.
The second "line of defense" of the Rockefellers - the XVIII CPC Congress (again November 2012).
If the Chinese leadership, both before and after the congress, maintains a balance that ensures uninterrupted “two-stroke” change of power - first the General Secretary of the CPC Central Committee and the Chairman of the PRC, and then, after five “intermediate” years, the Chairman of the Central Military Council (CER) , the chances of success for the Rothschilds will remain a bit. For a “safe haven” suitable for the transition to the “golden yuan” for the time necessary for the “reformatting” of the West, balanced China cannot become - only unbalanced, with the dominant dominance of one of the inner-party groups and the harsh suppression of all the others (like this took place in the 1970's). Without reliable 100% guarantees in the form of a gold-yuan pair, supplemented in the political sphere by a strategic Sino-Japanese alliance, the Rothschilds dollar and the US will not collapse - the risk of getting the situation out of control is too great, and then weapon. There will be a chance to lose everything at once, including life. The next line of defense of the Rockefellers (admittedly, after the elections in France, almost completely lost) is German Chancellor A. Merkel and, in general, the “axis” of the government coalition represented by the CDU-CSU bloc. and at the 23 EU summit in May, the new French President F. Hollande practically presented Merkel with a French-Dutch (in fact, Rothschild) ultimatum:
- abandon the idea of turning the EU into a political association;
- put the euro in dependence with the help of "Eurobonds" - collective debt obligations of the eurozone (the idea of Soros, apparently claiming control over them on behalf of the Rothschilds).
Only one thing can save the situation: Merkel’s decisive rejection of this ultimatum and the acceleration of the crisis in the eurozone — right up to its consolidation under German control, no matter which one is to be "asked" for it. That is, the transformation of Germany into a single and only emission center for the euro. In this case, the situation would essentially return to 1940: Europe under German control, but not tanks, and a printing press. A kind of "Fourth Reich." This is what Gerhard Schroeder spoke of in September 2011 when he called for the creation of the “United States of Europe” with the help of the Merkel – Sarkozy axis (which has since been swept away by the “wind of change”). It is unlikely that Merkel will succeed: first, it is necessary to consolidate German society, but it is fragmented and mainly in opposition to the "party in power". And the time before the election (September 2013) is too short.
And the last frontier is Russia V.V. Putin's
Having renewed the strategic alliance of Rosneft with the American Exxon-Mobil to 2011 (instead of British Petroleum), which was helped by the scandal in TNK-BP, the Russian leader gave a clear and unequivocal sign. It was understood and heard: that is why in January 2012 of the year, despite all the noisy reports of the State Department and the American embassy in support of street protests, in favor of V.V. Putin, as the future head of state, has expressed the patriarch of Russian politics, Academician EM. Primakov. A week later, such a significant figure as G. Kissinger appeared in Moscow. Interestingly: a day before the promulgation of the agreement between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller, TNK-BP left M. Friedman, head of Alfa Group, a consultant to the International Council of Experts of the US Council on Foreign Relations (his 2009 conflict with the aforementioned business Partner Rothschild Deripask
- V. Pavlenko, Doctor of Political Sciences, full member of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems
- http://akademiagp.ru/v-b-pavlenko-bolshaya-igra-rotshildov-i-rokfellerov-na-svetu-i-v-teni/
Information