Japan instead of Turkey. What makes the F-35 program attractive to US allies

20
The American F-35 multi-role fighter program has recently attracted the attention of world media - and above all because of a major political scandal that erupted after Turkey’s purchase of S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems from Russia. In response, Washington refused Ankara to sell the F-35. But Japan wanted to join the program. Why is the new American fighter so attractive?





F-35 Program: History and Benefits


The idea of ​​creating a single multi-purpose fighter in the United States of America came more than thirty years ago, in the 1980s, when the Cold War was still underway and in Washington they were concerned about the modernization of military equipment used by American aviation. And here, just in time, an event of a truly global level happened - the Soviet Union collapsed, and post-Soviet Russia fell into the orbit of American influence for some time. American politicians and diplomats frequented Moscow, intensified their work and special services.

In the 1995 year, when Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin was in power in the Russian Federation, the American company Lockheed Martin announced the receipt of technology from the Yakovlev Design Bureau, the illustrious Soviet-Russian design bureau that developed fighter jets. It was the experience accumulated by Soviet designers that was used for further developments in the creation of the American multi-role fighter.

At the same time, plagiarism should not be attributed to the Americans: despite the fact that in 1991-1997. Yakovlev Design Bureau and Lockheed Martin worked closely, many of the components used in the F-35 are significantly different. So, back in the 1950's. In the United States, the rotary nozzle mechanism was invented, and in the 1960 it was tested to create a supersonic fighter.

The immediate predecessors of the JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) program, due to which F-35 was developed, were the Common Affordable Light Fighter (CALF) and Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) programs. The first project was launched in 1992 and provided for the creation of a publicly accessible light fighter, and the second project was aimed at improving the strike capabilities of aviation - it was launched in 1993. Thus, to 1993-1994 years. The American military leadership finally decided on the need to replace the US Air Force multipurpose fighters with a single and maximally unified fighter.



In 1995, the United States' closest military-political ally, Great Britain, joined the program. London contributed 200 million dollars as a contribution to the project, that is, 10% of its cost. Thus, the program has acquired a supranational character and has become the largest program in the field of rearmament and modernization of combat aircraft since the end of the Cold War. No other country in the world offered such a program, so in some ways the project of the USA and Great Britain could be called unique. For example, for the needs of the US Air Force alone, it was planned to produce more than 2 of thousands of new aircraft.

In the 2001 year, the final choice was made in favor of the X-35 model presented by Lockheed Martin. According to the results of the competition, she was recognized as more effective than her main competitor - the X-32 model from Boeing. Thus, for the needs of the air force, naval aviation of the naval forces and marine infantry, a new uniform fighter was created with the possibility of vertical and short take-off and landing. The new fighter was supposed to replace the F-16, A-10, F / A-18, AV-8B and the British Sea Harrier. The advantages of the model presented by Lockheed Martin included the method of creating vertical thrust by using a special lifting fan. X-32 was deprived of such a fan.



Based on the test results, it was decided to develop standardized fighter-bombers for the aviation needs of NATO countries for land and sea based. US and UK invested $ X billion in 2,5 program. Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Turkey, Canada and Australia joined the project. It was decided to spend 233 billion dollars on the development and acquisition of aircraft, but then the implementation of the program was significantly delayed and, accordingly, the cost of its implementation increased.

Ultimately, the cost of servicing and upgrading aircraft can be over one trillion dollars in half a century. Naturally, with such expenses, the United States was interested in attracting the maximum number of its allies to participate in the program. But after Turkey acquired the Russian C-400, Washington decided to neglect even Turkish money in order to preserve the political face in such a delicate situation.

Meanwhile, it was in Turkey that it was planned to create a pan-European center for maintenance and repair of F-35 aircraft engines, which would meet the aviation needs of all countries participating in the North Atlantic Alliance. But the deterioration in relations between Ankara and Washington has put this plan at risk.

The economic implications of the program


It should be noted that many NATO countries were part of the program rather on a forced basis. The fact is that in modern conditions the cost of developing and building a new generation aircraft for most European countries has become overwhelming. And the only way to preserve their own aircraft design schools was only by joining a single project, the flagship of which were the United States and Great Britain.

For example, Italy throughout its stories was one of the key representatives of the European aircraft industry. At one time, Italians made a great contribution to aeronautics, to the construction of the first aircraft, and these traditions remained in the country throughout the twentieth century. Now in Italy there is the only aircraft factory outside the United States where the F-35 is manufactured. It is located in Novara, near the Cameri air base in the north of the country. The first F-35 fighter assembled outside the United States was released at this plant in early March of the 2015 year and received the designation AL-1.

The Italian leadership hoped to ensure the release of fighters both for the needs of the Italian Air Force and for the needs of the Netherlands Air Force, with which an agreement was reached.



Interestingly, Israel, the Republic of Korea and Japan did not initially join the F-35 program. As for Israel, the American military leadership did not trust him very much, but he quickly gained observer status in the program with the right to vote and began to receive the first F-35. Israeli military experts, by the way, rated the fighter itself and its technical characteristics very highly, but then critical comments about the new American aircraft began to appear in the Israeli press.

Japan, in turn, long expected that the United States would supply a more powerful F-22 aircraft for the needs of its aviation. For the American side, the constraining factor was that Japan, with its developed high-tech industry, would inevitably require a more serious level of participation in the program for itself.

In December 2016, US President Donald Trump announced that the cost of the program had gone out of control, after which the Pentagon started talking about serious fighter defects. In January 2019, Bloomberg published a report by the US Department of Defense that described the critical problems identified by numerous inspections of the latest fighter. In particular, it turned out that already many planes should be decommissioned, as their high-tech coating wears out quickly and they become available for enemy air defense radars. In a combat situation, such a defect can be fatal.

Will Japan come to the program instead of Turkey?


Until recently, Japan remained in the status of a foreign buyer of F-35 fighter jets, however, in the spring of 2019, it unexpectedly showed great interest in raising its status under this program. This interest from the Japanese leadership surprisingly coincided with the growing crisis in US-Turkish relations and the subsequent cessation of cooperation with Turkey through the F-35 program.

The scandal surrounding the supply of Russian C-400 and the American response to these deliveries in the form of Turkey's exclusion from the F-35 program was only one of the consequences of the general deterioration in relations between Ankara and Washington. Dissatisfied with the excessive ambitions of Recep Erdogan, the Americans tried to tell Turkey how to behave in the Middle East, and took the next step in demonstrating their independence from Ankara - Turkey ordered C-400 and, in principle, even under the threat of sanctions, did not want to abandon them acquisitions.

Then the United States expelled Turkey from the F-35 program and stopped training Turkish troops for flying this fighter, which had previously been launched in the United States. Naturally, the F-35 service center will also be moved from Turkey. In Ankara, the United States, of course, evaluated this behavior very negatively, calling it undermining the very foundations of partnership between countries. In addition, Recep Erdogan accused Washington of robbery, since Turkey has already invested heavily in the program and if it is excluded from it, then the question arises of reimbursing the money spent without a proper result.

After a vacant place appeared in the program, Japan declared its interest in it. However, many experts are convinced that the United States will refuse the Land of the Rising Sun to increase its status in the program. And the reason for such a decision by the American side will be precisely the presence in Japan of its own highly developed aviation industry.



In addition, Japan is currently developing its own new-generation aircraft, the X-2 Shinshin, based on which Tokyo wants to create its own new F-3 fighter. If Japan enters the F-35 program as a full-fledged production partner, then the creation of the Japanese fighter itself can significantly accelerate, as the Japanese will have access to many technological secrets and additional features.

There is one more nuance. The United States in the Asia-Pacific region, in addition to Japan, has another ally - South Korea. But for South Korea, the United States is an ally and intercessor, and Japan is an eternal economic competitor, with which, among other things, Korea has a very long and unpleasant joint history, full of historical insults to the island neighbor. So if Japan entered the F-35 program as a full member, it is possible that the South Korean side would make a similar request. But such a plot development is clearly not in the interests of the United States.

Thus, participation in the F-35 program is of great interest to countries with their own high potential in the field of aviation industry technologies. For them, cooperation with the United States in the production of the latest fighters is another tool for the development of their aviation industry, including to accelerate their own development in the field of fighter aircraft.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    1 August 2019 05: 46
    I'm wondering if this aircraft will be able to break the f16 sales record?
    1. +2
      1 August 2019 06: 10
      This is the most important question! And the results of combat use, comparable to Falcon, are far in the background!
      1. +1
        1 August 2019 06: 12
        if it can be sold in such a print run, I think they can not bathe at all what they think about it
        1. 0
          1 August 2019 07: 45
          Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
          if it can be sold in such a print run, I think they can not bathe at all what they think about it

          Well, they at least sell, and we give our weapons to the floor on credit
          1. +3
            1 August 2019 14: 29
            they are also on credit)))
    2. -6
      1 August 2019 06: 32
      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
      I'm wondering if this aircraft will be able to break the f16 sales record?

      And I'm wondering when the S-400 will shoot down the first F-35 (the intruder plane). And the fact that Japan decided to "fit into the program" is commendable. The downed plane will fall into the sea - ends in the water.
      1. +2
        1 August 2019 08: 08
        already .. already dropped ... ends and really into the water
    3. 0
      1 August 2019 16: 06
      f-35 will not break the record for several reasons
      firstly, operation is 3-4 times more expensive, and the price is impressive, i.e. they stupidly will not be able to contain so much
      secondly, f-35 obviously has very limited modernization resources.
    4. -3
      1 August 2019 20: 47
      Good question. Sherman, by the way, was such a guano in World War II. .A German tiger is the personification of technological power. The Germans even complained that on the Western Front, American tanks are ending earlier than shells in the German Tigers .. Think about what I mean.
  2. +1
    1 August 2019 08: 20
    It would be an interesting phenomenon to make a plane, like a combat unit, not for battle but for sale!
    However, the world has changed, anything unexpected can probably happen!
    One thing is clear, if the "penguin" scatters across the cities and towns, buyers will have to develop all the NECESSARY infrastructure !!! and this is no longer GUT, for their opponents !!! Because this is the most important thing in this project !!! Aircraft and others will do better, and the corresponding infrastructure will be the very thing!
    Those. it turns out that nothing was in vain (if completed) just very expensive !!!
    Envy is not worth it, but take it into account!
  3. +1
    1 August 2019 09: 22
    The whole question is, what are the REAL combat and operational qualities of F 35. Over the mountains of propaganda from all sides it is impossible to distinguish what is there and how. This suitcase flies frankly does not matter, it is more or less established (although there are doubts here too). All the rest is on the "conscience" of various kinds of commentators who do not recognize conscience, even if it knocks them on empty heads.
    And the next question is operating costs. Hundreds of millions of dollars from each country that buys this device every year - is this the real cost of operation, or is it just a form of tribute that the US collects from its "allies" more and more openly and shamelessly? The real fate of the aircraft and of the entire pro-American "military alliance" will largely depend on the answer to this question. Most of the "allies" will simply not be able to withstand the increased pressure on budgets, the world economy has been doing poorly in recent years, and nothing is visible in the waves ...
  4. 0
    1 August 2019 09: 43
    The Turks are generally arrogant, they themselves set up a partner by acquiring an air defense system from a likely enemy in violation of all the agreements on the bloc, and they also require compensation .. They must be expelled from NATO, and obligated to pay all costs associated with the transfer of production ..

    As for the plane, they will certainly run it in and finish it to the maximum speed, the strategy to be the first to detect and the first to shoot is thoughtlessly correct ..
    1. +3
      1 August 2019 10: 39
      maagalex (Alex) Today, 09:43

      the first to discover and the first to shoot thoughtlessly correct ..

      well, only from the point of view of a person who is familiar with the possibilities of air combat only from propaganda brochures. In fact, only the first is true. So earlier detection allows the first to start preparing for an attack. But with the "first shot", not everything is as rosy as you think. It is the Americans who manage to overwhelm the enemy with a score of 100: 0 in their demonstration training battles. Because the acquisition of a target for tracking is automatically counted as victory in aerial combat. Which is exactly what the F-35s allow, especially because of the veil of interference from the growlers. In reality, a lot of factors will affect the result of this first shot. And if the penguin did not hit targets with the first launches (and the internal compartments give almost no chance of repeated launches), then he has only one option - to smear his heels with kerosene. Since at medium and short distances, he has very little chance of survival
      1. -1
        1 August 2019 11: 19
        Well yes. Who said a missile shot would be a defeat to the target? And why not anti-ballistic missiles lead to success? This ship cannot dodge the rocket, and the aircraft is a fast and maneuverable device that moves in the same speed range as the rocket, plus all kinds of traps, plus jamming, plus other things. Not so great is the likelihood of defeat in general.
      2. -3
        1 August 2019 17: 09
        Quote: Ka-52
        In fact, only the first is true. So earlier detection allows the first to start preparing for an attack. But with the "first shot", not everything is as rosy as you think.

        This was true for the early 70s. But the technology does not stand still. The missiles are improving, the range of a possible first launch is growing. Of course, the first launch is not a guarantee of victory. But its importance is constantly growing, especially in the case when the enemy also has a great numerical advantage. And the F-35 is a lot, a lot ...
        Perhaps only the PRC can not give way to them in the number of boards. And that is not a fact ..
        Quote: Ka-52
        then he has only one option - to smear heels with kerosene. Since at medium and near distances he has very few chances to survive

        1) Here is the last real air battle - Pakistani F-16 block 30 against the Indian Su-30MKI. The F-16s were either discovered first and their missiles were long-range, or found simultaneously, only the missiles were better, but the fact was that they attacked first and the Su-30 pilots received Rita’s signal of shelling. What did they do ? Swiftly flew to realize their hypothetical advantage in the BVB? No, they are not suicide bombers, they completed the evasion maneuver and left the battle. That is, as you say, they spread the heels with kerosene ... But this is far from the latest F-16 variation, which the F-35, according to the Americans, defeats in the exercises with a score of 15-1.
        2) It is not clear why you think that the F-35 will not have a chance to survive in the BVB. He, of course, is not the best aircraft in this regard, but after lifting the restrictions, according to the Americans, he is no worse than the F-16.
        3) Not to mention that his main task is to work on the ground. Here, in terms of the totality of capabilities, more than one fighter can not be compared with him.
        1. 0
          2 August 2019 06: 26
          This was true for the early 70s.

          for what 70s ????? if you don’t know why write? In ALL recent air battles, the range of productive launches rarely exceeded 20 miles. And this is the 2000s, comrade expert!
          The missiles are improving, the range of a possible first launch is growing.

          All such statements by "experts" are based on the following conclusions:
          1. taken technical RVV flight range under the most favorable conditions according to advertising brochures.
          2. the target does not carry out anti-ballistic maneuvering, does not use means of disrupting guidance (and generally behaves like a fat dumb goose)
          3. the target is necessarily identified in advance, goes on the opposite course and does not suspect the enemy.
          4. It is believed that the speed (and therefore the ability to perform maneuvering of the explosive force) is the same throughout the flight to the target.

          In reality, Comrade Expert, the RBB range at an altitude of 1.5 km is approximately 35% lower than its flight range at an altitude of 8 km. The speed of the RBB in the final section of the trajectory drops from 3-4M (at the start) to 1,2M. Maneuvering behind an evading target leads to even greater energy loss and a drop in speed up to 0,8M. Accordingly, both the flight range and the probability of hitting a target. The more energetically the target dodges, the more energetically the RVV maneuvers and the more it loses the starting impulse. Talking about a range of 100500km is simply stupid.
          And we are only talking about the capabilities of the missiles themselves. And if we begin to list factors such as heading angles, the use of electronic warfare and measures to disrupt guidance, the problem of identifying targets (even among Americans), then your sighs about long-range air combat begin to simply cause a smile
          Here is the last real air battle - Pakistani F-16 block 30 against Indian Su-30MKI

          not an indicator at all. Because the course of the battle is known only by the nonsense of both sides, the distorted media.
          It is not clear why you think that the F-35 will not have a chance to survive in the BVB. He, of course, is not the best aircraft in this regard, but after lifting the restrictions, according to the Americans, he is no worse than the F-16.

          hahah))) you are a fan of lightning. I praise for persistent American patriotism, Comrade Belisarius lol In reality, only the F-16 behaves better than the F-22 of the other "Americans" in maneuvering, and then only at high angles of attack.
          3) Not to mention that his main task is to work on the ground. Here, in terms of the totality of capabilities, more than one fighter can not be compared with him.

          The possibilities of working on the ground are the capabilities of the station itself and the weapons adapted to it. What does the penguin have to do with it? And how will strike capabilities help him survive in aerial combat?
          1. -1
            2 August 2019 15: 11
            Quote: Ka-52
            for what 70s ????? if you don’t know why write? In ALL recent air battles, the range of productive launches rarely exceeded 20 miles. And this is the 2000s, comrade expert!

            In the 60s, the Americans had confidence that there would be no more BVB, Vietnam showed that this was not so (but, by the way, it showed the huge advantage of the first detection and launch). However, with the development of technology, the value of DVB increased more and more. BVB was not there for a very long time. I recall the meaning of the terms-BVB is a battle at a visual range. Over 20 miles that you write about is a long-range battle. I did not write about the range of 10500 km that you are talking about.
            Quote: Ka-52
            then your sighs about long-range air combat begin to simply cause a smile

            All this is true and beautifully written, but not on the topic. I wrote that the first detection and attack is not a panacea, but a method of obtaining a tactical advantage which, together with a numerical advantage, will always be with the F-35 (except for a possible conflict with the PRC ) will give the opportunity to gain dominance in the air. No one talks about 100% attacks from a distance of 150 km.
            Quote: Ka-52
            not an indicator at all. Because the course of the battle is known only by the nonsense of both sides, the distorted media.

            In this case, this is just the information of the Indian media (which just really love to exaggerate their successes). And the information is perfectly logical, if Rita warns you, you will do the evasion maneuver, and not look for close combat with an unknown enemy
            Quote: Ka-52
            In reality, only the F-16 behaves better than the F-22 of the other "Americans" in maneuvering, and then only at high angles of attack.

            An interesting statement. However, I wrote, it is not inferior, but not superior, these are different things. And then maybe you know American planes better than the Americans themselves, but you need to prove this statement.
            Quote: Ka-52
            What does the penguin have to do with it? And how will strike capabilities help him survive in aerial combat?

            No, that's right. I simply reminded that the Penguin is a multi-purpose aircraft, whose dignity primarily lies in its wide range of strike capabilities. Of course, you know that aviation is intended specifically for striking the ground. Fighters are service personnel. The station and weapons that allow this are integrated into a specific aircraft which, in addition to strike capabilities, can also conduct air combat.
            .
            Quote: Ka-52
            hahah))) you are a fan of lightning. I praise for persistent American patriotism, Comrade Belisarius

            But this is a systemic and fundamental error. You cannot mix ideology with technology. The one who does this has already lost. If you have already switched to personalities, I’m a fundamental adversary of capitalism as a whole, and especially its American version. But this has nothing to do with technology relationship, here you need to judge rationally. On the whole, your BVB fetish would be similar to the stories about the very real advantages of the Yak-3 and La-7 and the shortcomings of the first jet aircraft, or the stories about the advantages of the Mig-21 and Mig-23 after the appearance of the F-15. Fortunately, then they were not guided by such ideas and created fundamentally new programs. From my point of view, you need not pray for close combat, but create and mass-produce airplanes that are not inferior to the F-35 in the long-range.
    2. 0
      1 August 2019 12: 33
      Once again I will repeat for trolls, TURKS TO GET AND S-400 and F-35 and the military alliance of Turkey with NATO and the United States is a different level, my opinion is that the Turks wanted to gain control in the Middle East and Central Asia, but there are two problems here: Persians with Jews, Turks could agree with Arabs and Central Asia, but the Persians are an eternal problem, and Jews, too, if they unite the Middle East, then new problems would appear: the USA, Europe, Russia, China, etc., in short, the problem of this world eternal, there is a universal formula for combining all e about Islam, but also within the various currents of Islam everyone thinks that he is right.
      1. 0
        1 August 2019 14: 08
        there is a universal formula for uniting all this is Islam

        why Islam, and not Christianity, Buddhism, or at worst pastafarianism? Or is the pasta god less likely to unite people?)
        Turks wanted control in the Middle East and Central Asia

        the unification of BV and Asia under the auspices of Turkey is not possible from the word at all. They have nothing to offer the Arab world
  5. +1
    1 August 2019 12: 00
    Quote: maagalex
    framed a partner by acquiring an air defense system from a likely adversary in violation of all agreements under the block

    and what contract did they violate?
    for example, the United States is buying a whole range of military equipment in the Russian Federation and everything is OK - only lobbyists of the military industrial complex are unhappy.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"