In Rybinsk launched the third "Rook" to protect the Crimean bridge

54
Special brigade "Rosgvardii", carrying out the protection of the Crimean bridge, will soon get into service anti-diversion boats. A solemn launching ceremony of the third Rook for the brigade was held today at the Rybinsky SSZ Vympel. It is reported by the press service of the shipyard.

In Rybinsk launched the third "Rook" to protect the Crimean bridge




It is reported that this is the third anti-sabotage boat in a series of four being built in the interests of the Federal Service of Forces of the Russian Guard, the second production boat was launched on July 10 this year. The contract for the supply of four boats for the Kerch Brigade was concluded at the end of 2017 of the year with a delivery date of November of 1 of the year to 2019.

Today in Rybinsk, the third “Rook” was launched to guard the Crimean Bridge. The crew has already begun to master the ship,

- Said the Rosguards, while confirming that all boats will arrive in Kerch this fall.

Special brigade of the Rosguard, created to protect the Crimean bridge. deployed in Kerch and has a large arsenal of tools designed to prevent sabotage from both water and land.

The 21980 anti-sabotage boat "Rook" is designed to combat submarine sabotage forces and means to support the actions of combat swimmers in the water area of ​​the basing station and on the approaches to it. Able to be autonomously at sea for up to five days with a cruising range of up to 200 nautical miles. Crew - 8 man.

Displacement - about 140 t, length - 30 m, width - 7,3 m, draft - 1,8 m
Full speed - knot 23
Navigation range - 200 miles
Autonomy - 5 days
Crew - 8 man
Armament: one 14,5-mm MTPU machine-gun unit, one DP-64 anti-sabotage grenade launcher, one DP-65 anti-sabotage grenade launcher, four Igla-type MANPADS.

Electronic weapons: NRS MP-231, GAS Kalmar, OGAS Anapa.
  • Press Service of the Rybinsk Administration
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    30 July 2019 16: 23
    The news is good, but not a little, only 4?
    1. +5
      30 July 2019 16: 28
      At the Black Sea Fleet six more at the Navy.
    2. +3
      30 July 2019 16: 29
      For the Black Sea Fleet, patrol ships of pr.22160 are still under construction. They are also able to perform anti-sabotage functions.
    3. +2
      30 July 2019 16: 57
      Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
      The news is good, but not a little, only 4?

      The bridge is not guarded by the Rooks alone.
    4. +9
      30 July 2019 16: 59
      And at a speed it’s rather weak.
      1. +1
        30 July 2019 17: 29
        I also wanted about it. And there will be no boats on hydrofoils for this purpose? Although that I understand the land tovarisch in the ships. winked
      2. 0
        30 July 2019 21: 40
        But the bullets fly fast.
        1. +3
          30 July 2019 22: 30
          That's just with the "bullets" limping, there you need 30mm with stabilization in horizontal and vertical. set, so that there was a possibility of effective work at 5 km - the distance of the enemy's ATGM / MANPADS, otherwise - the threat of destruction from any "boat"
  2. -6
    30 July 2019 16: 28
    Of course I didn’t ship, but I’m looking at this boat-power of attorney doesn’t cause! As it is with stability, it is piled on top, and there is no rainfall. It can only be released into the calm. Can it be so? No. what hi
    1. -4
      30 July 2019 16: 58
      Quote: fa2998
      I certainly did not ship

      Noticeably.
      1. +1
        30 July 2019 17: 01
        Is it possible to learn more? This ship does not look like a tumbler. hi
        1. -7
          30 July 2019 17: 03
          Quote: fa2998
          Is it possible to learn more? This ship does not look like a tumbler. hi

          Yes, surely the boat passed the tests before going into the series. Designed and release it just SHIP. What details do you need? Can you use Google?
          1. -1
            30 July 2019 17: 07
            Yes, our cars undergo test-coffins on wheels, buckets with nuts, do it yourself. lol hi
            1. +1
              30 July 2019 17: 33
              Quote: fa2998
              Yes, our cars undergo test-coffins on wheels, buckets with nuts, do it yourself. lol hi

              Well, it started. Again, we have nothing good, no cars, no weapons, we release one shit. They saw the photo and already made conclusions about the performance characteristics.
              As my commander said - "Born to crawl, don't get confused on the runway."
            2. +1
              30 July 2019 17: 50
              I would like to look at a new car of the same price category, which would significantly surpass domestic ones in terms of safety and durability. In addition to "Logan", I do not know of those. Tell me if you know, I will be grateful :))
          2. -2
            31 July 2019 03: 52
            And how did the Ukrainian boats of "Gyurza" avenue humiliate? How bad they are. And as a "rook" it's just a great boat. laughing
            1. 0
              31 July 2019 13: 25
              Quote: From Siberia we
              And how did the Ukrainian boats of "Gyurza" avenue humiliate? How bad they are. And as a "rook" it's just a great boat. laughing

              I wrote to you about "Gyurza"? But when they start to dabble in Russian, I feel like something out of this from such writers.
      2. 0
        30 July 2019 19: 36
        You also seem not to be a shipwright)
        1. +2
          30 July 2019 21: 06
          Quote: 2 level advisor
          You also seem not to be a shipwright)

          He didn’t ship at all, although he wore it and still have the right to wear a marine uniform. I can read and think a bit before writing not-so-smart assumptions. hi
    2. +3
      30 July 2019 17: 28
      It can only be released in calm

      How nekorabel, nekorabella, who can read for that!

      This is a boat of the coastal zone, designed to work with excitement up to 4 points.

      The draft is under 2 meters, for example, the project 21631 has a draft of only 2,5 meters and a superstructure is what


      I’m not talking about gun calibers and any other burden. And nothing turns upside down.

      Maybe so?

      Maybe you should first read, think before rushing to write?
    3. +2
      30 July 2019 21: 38
      And who will climb the bridge in a storm? Will smash nafig wave. And underwater at these depths in a storm is not very good. Normal patrol boat. But what has to do with the "Russian Guard", Zolotov was given a full admiral?
  3. BAI
    -5
    30 July 2019 16: 29
    Too small. How will he ram violators?
    1. -3
      30 July 2019 16: 34
      He does not ram them, suppresses grenades.
      1. -5
        30 July 2019 16: 46
        Quote: seregin-s1
        He does not ram them, suppresses grenades.

        Does the needle knock drones?
    2. 0
      30 July 2019 19: 46
      Quote: BAI
      Too small. How will he ram violators?

      He will not have to ram, he will not catch the offender. Except that whatever the Ukrainian tugboat.
  4. -7
    30 July 2019 16: 44
    In fact, the bridge is expensive. Aggressive neighbors from the independent contribute to this.
    1. +3
      30 July 2019 16: 55
      Quote: Elephant
      In fact, the bridge is expensive. Aggressive neighbors from the independent contribute to this.

      Security has always been expensive; there are always many hunters for the weak.
    2. 0
      30 July 2019 16: 57
      Quote: Elephant
      In fact, the bridge is expensive. Aggressive neighbors from the independent contribute to this.

      Put a minus, since you undermine faith in Russia, do not take into account the fact: such a bridge ALREADY tried to build and could not! Praised German engineers ... do not take into account the fact:
      in Crimea people should not to feel isolated from Russia and much more ...
      there are objects more expensive than money!
      1. -8
        30 July 2019 17: 05
        And you minus in revenge. I just stated a fact, nothing more. The security issue has not been raised.
      2. +5
        30 July 2019 18: 12
        Quote: himRa
        in Crimea, people should not feel isolated from Russia

        come on, I’m just from Yalta, I hasten to inform you - there is no Sberbank there, as well as VTB .... Lukoil-Rosneft and Gazprom aren’t the same, they will shoot 300 rubles a day (unlimited on the entire peninsula) MTS-Tele2 and others like them absent .... then explain your phrase - people should not feel apart from Russia .... almost 5 years have passed ... ..
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        30 July 2019 19: 34
        Quote: himRa
        ALREADY tried to build and could not! The vaunted German engineers ... do not take into account the fact:

        sorry but they could not for another reason
        In the spring of 1943, Hitler ordered the construction of a five-kilometer automobile and railway bridge across the Kerch Strait for the subsequent invasion of Iran through the Caucasus. Construction work began, but the advance of the Red Army did not allow the German troops to complete the construction. When the German troops retreated, the cableway was partially dismantled and partially blown up, and the unfinished bridge was destroyed; but already in February 1944, Soviet troops restored the cableway and used it to support the offensive, later it was dismantled and relocated to the Carpathians.
        Already in January 1943, Soviet troops drove the Germans out of Taman, and in May 1944 from the Crimea. The Nazi retreat was so rapid that they left cement and beams for the bridge.
        And, already on April 24, Soviet builders drove the first pile on the opposite side of the strait from Kerch. In vain rush, as history has shown
        1. 0
          30 July 2019 21: 26
          However, in the 30s, during the period of industrialization of the country, the “great leader” Joseph Stalin recalled the project. This time, along with the bridge, they also wanted to reconstruct the railways adjacent to it. The highway was supposed to pass from the south of Ukraine from Kherson through the Crimea, then along the bridge across the Kerch Strait, along the Taman Peninsula with access to the Novorossiysk region and then along the entire Black Sea coast of the Caucasus to Poti. At that time, domestic factories could not cope with the release of all the metal parts necessary for the construction of a giant bridge, so they were ordered shortly before the Great Patriotic War in Germany, with which economic relations were developing successfully at that time.

          When, in 1942, German troops captured Crimea, they decided to use the metal structures manufactured by order of the USSR for their intended purpose and sent them from Germany to Kerch. They began preparatory work in the early spring of 1943 with the construction of a railway from Krymskaya station to Chushka spit. From there, in the direction of the Crimean village of Zhukovka, they began to build approaches to the bridge over a strait with a length of over 3,5 kilometers.

          But soon the construction stopped. The situation on the Caucasian front has changed for the Germans for the worse. And already in the summer of 1943, instead of a bridge, German military engineers designed and built a cableway across the Kerch Strait to transport military goods to blocked troops in the Taman Peninsula area as soon as possible. For several months, it almost uninterruptedly delivered 500-800 tons of various cargoes every day. But this did not help the invaders. In the fall, before fleeing from the Taman Peninsula, the Nazis blew up part of the supports of the cable car, but did not manage to completely destroy the structure.

          I understand what you want to say, but the Nazis hammered the first piles, and ... realizing that they didn’t have time (things at the front), they switched to the cable car and this does not detract from the RF engineer ...
          right? stands a bridge and will stand! )) Moreover, this year there will be a railway message ... I hope you are happy with this news ... I read a lot of your comments, too many contradictions, oh well ... let's say this: whose Crimea?
          1. 0
            1 August 2019 10: 30
            Quote: himRa
            let's say this: whose Crimea?

            you speak like Natsik from Ukraine. Our flag is there, but state-owned companies are afraid to go there - sanctions!
  5. +3
    30 July 2019 17: 09
    something I do not catch up.
    but what, the guard is not only driving tanks and bombs, but also floating?
    somehow it’s not too much like internal troops
    1. +4
      30 July 2019 17: 26
      Quote: yehat
      something I do not catch up.
      but what, the guard is not only driving tanks and bombs, but also floating?
      somehow it’s not too much like internal troops

      Oh well u vovanov "waterfowl" divisions were formed already in 1975. And then they only grew and multiplied - as the water threat to the objects protected by IW / RG was realized. smile
      In 1984, by order of the chief of internal troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR as part of military units for the protection of objects on water communications, separate divisions of crews of boats and divers were reduced to divisions of patrol ships (boats) consisting of 103 and 104 divisions.
      In 1988, on their basis, the first separate detachment of patrol ships (boats) of airborne forces in the Far East and Armed Forces was created. It included a training center for the training and retraining of divers.
      By order of the USSR Council of Ministers of May 18, 1989, the Atomflot atomic fleet repair and technological enterprise of the Murmansk Shipping Company and ships located in its water area were to be taken under military guard. By order of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs of August 3, 1989, the organizational and staffing structure was approved - the 2nd marine detachment of patrol ships (boats) of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs with a base in Murmansk.

      So the WG inherited a rather large fleet from the BB ... and immediately expanded it at the expense of the naval detachment for the protection of the Bridge:
      1st marine detachment of military unit 3800 (Khabarovsk).
      2nd marine detachment of military unit 3798 (Murmansk).
      31 training naval detachment of military unit 7628 (Severobaykalsk), the former 5th separate training naval division (training specialists for naval units and units of the Russian National Guard troops).
      32nd naval detachment of military unit 6777 (Ozersk and Snezhinsk) patrol boat divisions, security tasks in the water areas of lakes: Irtyash; Sinara and the Strongman.
      39 marine detachment of military unit 6942 (Kerch) guards the Crimean bridge (consisting of 115 separate special-purpose brigades).
      The patrol boat division of military unit 3705 (Sosnovy Bor) is the guard of the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant (as part of the brigade).
      Not separate companies and platoons of patrol (patrol) boats of military units. (Sochi, Kazan, Voronezh, Krasnoyarsk, etc.).
    2. 0
      30 July 2019 19: 46
      Vova not only swim, but also fly. It had its own aviation and its own naval units. Like the border guards.
      1. 0
        31 July 2019 10: 04
        I do not understand this. if you have heavy equipment, you are an army, not internal troops.
        for the tasks of explosives do not need bombers or tanks.
        And if the explosives are equipped with these means, it is worth asking in the Duma a question - what the hell are the troops sent to act with the civilian population armed with THIS - in my opinion,
        here is not far from the genocide. It remains to equip TOC and chemical weapons for completeness.
        a rubber boat is enough to patrol the bridge.
        If they make seaworthy boats, this is not a problem for explosives.
        1. -1
          31 July 2019 10: 16
          To protect the bridge of a rubber boat is definitely not enough. Like my grandfather with a berdanka to protect nuclear power plants. In Chechnya, the VVshniki were not at all at peace with the war. And how to do it without heavy weapons? And if you look deeper into history, then the NKVD troops and tanks stopped and they did it well.
        2. 0
          31 July 2019 11: 06
          Quote: yehat
          for the tasks of explosives do not need bombers or tanks.


          Quote: yehat
          And if the explosives are equipped with these means, it is worth asking in the Duma a question - what the hell are the troops sent to act with the civilian population armed with THIS - in my opinion,

          What civilian population? What about this?

          Let me remind you that enter the tasks of the explosives including:
          participation in ensuring regimes of emergency, martial law, the legal regime of counter-terrorism operations;
          participation in the territorial defense of the Russian Federation;

          The use of the army in the First and Second Chechen was due precisely to the fact that the explosives did not have enough forces to restoration of constitutional order. Because, according to the law, on the territory of the Russian Federation, without the introduction of an emergency regime, only explosives can conduct combat operations.
          Quote: yehat
          a rubber boat is enough to patrol the bridge.

          We put a pressure chamber on it - and we get a submarine rubber boat. For the inspection of the same bridge piers for something bad is the task of the units guarding the bridge.
          Quote: yehat
          If they make seaworthy boats, this is not a problem for explosives.

          So the bridge on the left and right is the sea. And at sea there is excitement, on which a rubber boat turns into an attraction "hold on to me".
  6. 0
    30 July 2019 17: 25
    It’s good that the rooks are being built. I in Crimea bought two studios in a construction site, just by the sea)) investments are protected)))
  7. -1
    30 July 2019 17: 57
    It's a good news.
  8. +1
    30 July 2019 20: 04
    Third?!! This is the scale!
    1. -1
      30 July 2019 20: 15
      Quote: universe1
      Third?!! This is the scale!

      And how much is that bridge? How many do you need ? 20 boats? 40? You are tormented by listing who does not guard this bridge. Believe me, there are enough forces.
      1. 0
        30 July 2019 23: 29
        How many ports are there in Crimea, how many military bases ...
  9. +1
    30 July 2019 20: 11
    And to load the SZ "More", which will probably be closer to the bridge and specialize in such vessels, this motney-religion does not allow what? ...
    Apparently, no one needs to save specialists who are massively fired due to the penny s / p for three people a day. Presumably, any Vasya can cook under an X-ray. A steamer, any Kolya will collect. And systems, dviglo, wires, any Fedya mounts ....
    How to feed a family on twenty thousand rubles at Moscow prices ?.
  10. +2
    30 July 2019 22: 22
    Sberbank and VTB, MTS, etc. in Crimea, no, because as soon as they find themselves there they immediately KIRDYK in the form of sanctions from the United States and all "progressive humanity." Here is an incident, like Russia, but no ... as if not our land. The bourgeois are afraid for their money.
  11. 0
    31 July 2019 10: 31
    Quote: AS Ivanov.
    And if you look a little deeper into history, then the NKVD troops and tanks stopped and they did pretty well

    only much more often did the NKVD troops, not adapted for army operations, quickly lose their combat readiness and retreat, as happened on the border and in 42nd during the Blau operation
  12. 0
    31 July 2019 11: 27
    Quote: Alexey RA
    The use of the army in the First and Second Chechen was due precisely to the fact that the explosives did not have enough forces to

    there should be interaction between the armed forces
    with your logic, explosives will be needed and nuclear submarines.
    If you don’t have enough strength, give the explosive temporary reinforcement parts — artillery, tanks
    If there is nothing to patrol, use a fleet with BB representatives on board
    And with your logic, in the army, except for the warrior, all the soldiers will have to get shields with batons,
    and in the BB it would be necessary to install tori with tunguska, multiple launch rocket systems, etc.
    compound compounds interact poorly? Teach officers, not produce extra troops.
    1. 0
      31 July 2019 19: 50
      Quote: yehat
      there should be interaction between the armed forces

      What kind of interaction? The army, by law, has no right to fight inside the country, except in a state of emergency (for the introduction of which at one time even the war in Chechnya was not enough - the government really does not like to introduce this regime). Fighting the internal enemy is the task of the BB, just as in the USA it is the task of the National Guard.
      In addition, do not forget that the BB is a reserve of the armed forces.
      Quote: yehat
      If there is nothing to patrol, use a fleet with BB representatives on board

      The fleet is not engaged in the protection of objects - it does not have extra forces and powers for this. A naval boat does not even have the right to detain the alleged intruder.
    2. +1
      1 August 2019 18: 11
      Quote: yehat
      If there is nothing to patrol, use a fleet with BB representatives on board

      That is, the fleet must distinguish boats from its composition. Set up a base for them. Supply them. And not be able to use them for other purposes - because the bridge always needs protection. Changing boats is also undesirable - new crews will have to delve into the features of the patrol area for a long time. Moreover, these boats will be based and serve in a place that the fleet is not interested at all - for the Black Sea Fleet, the fight against PDSS and patrolling the water area are needed in Novorossiysk and Sevastopol, and not in Kerch.
      In fact, if you assign the protection of the Bridge to the Black Sea Fleet, the fleet will forever lose 4 boats. Or the WG will bombard the MoD and the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet with angry letters about the inadmissibility of the use of boats from the Bridge security forces to perform extraneous tasks.
      1. 0
        2 August 2019 10: 40
        Thank you for writing desk games, but it doesn’t bother me)))
        the fleet should sail, and BB should walk on foot, this is my deep conviction.
        although ... inflatable boats so be fit into my idea of ​​internal troops,
        because the inner fleet does not accept my brain.
  13. 0
    1 August 2019 10: 19
    Quote: Alexey RA
    except in an emergency

    and is the need for tanks not an emergency?
    is it so fluid?
    1. +1
      1 August 2019 17: 45
      Quote: yehat
      and is the need for tanks not an emergency?
      is it so fluid?

      But do not you remember how both wars of power were dodged by the snake, just not to introduce the state of emergency? There is no state of emergency in the country - it’s just restoration of constitutional order.
      In the same Dagestan, near the border, the army men howled: they, according to the law, without the state of emergency, had the right only to return fire - until the first bullets flew, the soldier could not shoot. Even if gunmen go up to the checkpoint.
      1. 0
        1 August 2019 18: 01
        I was somewhat preoccupied with myself, I did not particularly watch, but then I talked with those who were there.
        they say the second company was a madhouse, and the first is much worse
        two soldiers say they don’t remember the 2nd company at all - they were constantly either drunk to zero or under drugs. We lost our armored personnel carrier, just woke up in the morning and there is no typewriter ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"