DefendTex Drone-40 Barrage Ammunition: A Compact Multi-Purpose Tool

53
In recent years, the concept of anti-burglar munitions has gained some popularity. The development of electronics allows you to implement it in different ways, including the most interesting. Not so long ago, the original version of the locking ammunition was proposed by the Australian company DefendTex. The Drone-40 product is made in the dimensions of an 40-mm grenade for an under-barrel grenade launcher, but is capable of performing UAV tasks.


Drone-40 in combat




Original concept


DefendTex Drone-40 barrage munition was developed recently, it was first presented in May this year at the conference of the US Special Operations Forces SOFIC-2019. The military was familiarized with the new project documentation and with a real model.

The Australian company offers an original concept of a multifunctional product, on the basis of which you can create locking ammunition of different sizes and with different characteristics. The project Drone-40 is about the device caliber 40 mm, compatible with a number of existing grenade launchers.

A new type of UAV should be fired by a grenade launcher or other launcher, then launch its own propeller groups and fly. Using its own means of observation, the product provides target searching or reconnaissance. In another configuration, it is able to strike at the designated object. The concept provides for equipping the device with combat units of various types or specialized equipment.

According to the developer, such ideas can be implemented in locking ammunition of various kinds. Already submitted product for 40-mm systems. In the future, it is planned to develop similar systems in the form of an 12 caliber cartridge and 81-mm mines.

Drone-40


The current Drone-40 product is a device with a caliber of 40 mm and a length of about 170-180 mm with a cylindrical body and a lively or flat head fairing. Such a UAV is noticeably larger and heavier than the standard 40x46 mm grenade, but differs from it in functions and objectives.

The ammunition head is a payload module. First of all, the Drone-40 should carry combat units of various types. Declared the possibility of using fragmentation, armor-piercing, smoke or thermobaric warhead. It is also possible to use a reconnaissance system with a video camera or an “anti-thrust” warhead. The method of action of the latter is not specified.

The cylindrical part of the body is an instrument compartment with the necessary equipment. Four slots are provided in the housing wall, in which four folding supports with electric motors and screws are placed before launch. Inside the case are controls, battery, etc. The flight is carried out with the help of four motors with screws. The device is controlled from the console or flies according to a predetermined program using satellite navigation. The rear wall of the central compartment is reinforced for interaction with powder gases. This part of the Drone-40 is placed in a sleeve with a propellant charge.

Using any serial 40-mm grenade launcher, the Drone-40 product should be launched in the direction of the enemy. Available powder charge provides care from the starting point. In flight, the UAV opens the plumage and starts the engines, as a result of which it becomes a typical quadcopter. The on-board equipment provides two-way data exchange and video transmission to the operator.

The onboard battery allows the ammunition to fly an active flight for 12 minutes. When hovering at one point, the flight time increases to 20 min. Level flight speed - up to 20 m / s. Work is provided at a distance of up to 10 km from the operator.

It is argued that the system Drone-40 is extremely simple design and low cost. The drone consists mainly of finished components that are in the series. Especially for it is made the minimum required number of parts. Due to this, the cost of experimental products does not exceed $ 1000. The launch of mass production will reduce this parameter by about half.

Methods of Use


As planned by the creators, the Drone-40 munitions munitions can be used to solve a wide range of tasks by infantry or special units. First of all, such products should be a simple and affordable means of intelligence. With the help of standard weapons, the fighters will be able to “hang” a video camera over the enemy’s position and observe its actions, gaining an advantage.

According to the data from the reconnaissance vehicle, it is possible to carry out an attack using combat UAVs. To this end, DefendTex offers several options for combat units for various purposes. With their help, ammunition can fight manpower, buildings and even armored vehicles. Due to the ability to control and manual guidance, Drone-40 should show high accuracy and effectiveness of hitting targets.

It is also proposed the mass use of anti-ship ammunition with different payloads. Such a “swarm” should include devices with reconnaissance equipment and products with warheads of different types. This will allow you to explore and identify targets in a given area, and then hit them using the most effective in this situation. weapons - including a simultaneous strike.

Possible prospects


The theme of anti-ship ammunition in recent years has been actively developed, aided by both the development of technology and the interest from industry and potential customers. Australian experts from DefendTex drew attention to this trend and presented their concept, as well as one of the options for its implementation.


Intelligence modification with a video camera


The Drone-40 sample shown in May looks interesting and promising, though not without flaws. No less interesting is the general concept of building a UAV in the form factor of ammunition for rifles, grenade launchers and mortars. It can be further developed and has chances to reach real operation.

The main advantage of the project DefendTex Drone-40 can be considered the fact of creating locking ammunition for 40-mm grenade launchers. Such a product does not require special means to launch, and therefore it can enter into service with a wide range of units. Low cost and its expected reduction will also contribute to the widespread adoption of the Drone-40. The ability to use different warheads or special equipment is also a definite plus tactical.

The use of the 40mm grenade form factor for infantry grenade launchers has led to limitations and even disadvantages. Due to the limited dimensions of the case, the Drone-40 can only be in the air for a maximum of 10-20 minutes. The carrying capacity of the product is limited, and therefore the video camera has to be made as a separate module for mounting instead of the warhead. Because of this, attacking one target using one warhead requires the participation of at least two drones.

Some of the problems that exist with the Drone-40 can be eliminated when developing new locking ammunition with increased dimensions. So, 81-mm mortar mine can simultaneously carry the camera and the warhead. In the case of smaller products, such as the “bullet” of an 12 caliber, new problems and difficulties should be expected.

It should be noted that at the moment DefendTex Drone-40 products exist only in the form of prototypes and still remain at the testing stage. The existence of the project was told only a few months ago. The new development has attracted media attention, but so far nothing is known about the interest of potential customers. Also, the timing of the emergence of new designs that develop the proposed concept remains unknown.

Thus, the interim results of the project so far look modest. Australian experts from DefendTex have proposed and implemented an interesting concept of a compact and lightweight patrol munition that can carry different loads and solve various problems. However, due to objective limitations, the Drone-40 product has some drawbacks that can impair its real capabilities. What will be the future of the new ammunition and the whole concept is unclear. You should expect new messages. Perhaps they will reveal both the future of the project and the opinion of potential customers.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    30 July 2019 07: 09
    An interesting idea.
    1. +5
      30 July 2019 09: 04
      Proven in battles. This concept has proven itself in Iraq and Syria. Where the bahamas such UAVs were built with electrical tape and matches.


      Well, here are the 40mm grenades:



      Well, the UAVs themselves.




  2. 0
    30 July 2019 07: 31
    Cool idea. About 15 years ago, we developed something similar. But these were just different ammunition for a 40-mm grenade launcher, or a camera, or a guided combat charge.
  3. 0
    30 July 2019 07: 54
    It remains to come up with. how to overcome enemy "jammers". Maybe declare REP a war crime?
    1. +2
      30 July 2019 08: 24
      Quote: Spade
      It remains to come up with. how to overcome enemy "jammers". Maybe declare REP a war crime?

      Well, not every opponent has them, all the more so in sufficient quantities, and the concept is extremely interesting and promising.
      1. 0
        30 July 2019 08: 42
        Quote: Warrior2015
        Well, not every opponent has them

        Better to say so: while the most poor babays do not have this. If "friends" don't help
        Quote: Warrior2015
        promising.

        In the future, REP will be for everyone., In the future, optics will be detected and suppressed, in the future, UAVs of any size will be detected and destroyed

        This "promising concept" has no prospects
        1. 0
          30 July 2019 09: 34
          Quote: Spade
          In the future, REP will be for everyone., In the future, optics will be detected and suppressed, in the future, UAVs of any size will be detected and destroyed

          Perhaps, and in the long run, but so far the "Barmaley bombers" have created certain problems for the outposts of the anti-terrorist forces from Iraq to Syria, including our Khmeimim. Of course, different methods of fighting are offered (including "interceptor drones" with nets, claws, etc.) - but so far, "bombers" are ahead.
        2. 0
          30 July 2019 10: 36
          Quote: Spade
          This "promising concept" has no prospects

          Here you are right, but there are no prospects for another reason. At short distances and in small sizes, it is more profitable to have a conventional UAV launched from the hands or a robotic manipulator, such a "manual" version of the UAV will be more efficient due to the larger dimensions (more electronics (better optics), fuel, ammo, lower fuel consumption and higher speed for account of the size of the blades) and a better distribution of elements in their volume, but worse than the "caliber" it will be only in terms of delivery time to the work area, which, taking into account the small distance (range of the grenade launcher / mortar / RPG), will be equal to a couple of seconds, which will be leveled for spending time on UAV stabilization and reconnaissance in relation to the terrain
        3. 0
          30 July 2019 20: 50
          The simplest ammunition for a 40mm grenade launcher, it can be armed with any and very numerous units. Why does your rep work in a spherical vacuum? But isn't the enemy concerned about cleaning up these REP assets, can the REP cover 100% of the territory where the enemy infantry is?
          1. 0
            30 July 2019 21: 27
            Quote: English tarantass
            Why does your rep work in a spherical vacuum?

            On the contrary, it works in reality. Therefore it is applied.

            Quote: English tarantass
            But is not the enemy concerned about cleaning up these REP funds

            Of course it’s preoccupied, but to the point ...

            Quote: English tarantass
            Can a REP cover 100% of the territory in which enemy infantry is located?

            Yes.
            1. 0
              31 July 2019 09: 34
              Excuse me, but to all objections like: "why so, and not so" you answer approximately: "because I know how to do it right." I do not want to discuss this topic with you, for that there is an equally stubborn and self-confident Professor.
        4. 0
          4 August 2019 10: 12
          In Russia, for a quarter century, everything is only in perspective. At the moment, specifically we have none of this. Is it only on Channel One. In Chechnya and in Abkhazia, even at the level of brigades, there was virtually no electronic warfare. And here we are talking about the separation.
    2. +3
      30 July 2019 09: 12
      What are jammers? We invented a portable type portable nuclear reactor? Where is the energy from?

      All jammers now work according to 2 principles:
      - a small area of ​​continuous signal suppression. And this does not help against the drones going to the ANN. For example, those who attack Khmemim, they go to the ANN + Glonass + GPS corrections, and only the ANN in the final section. Therefore, despite the range in 40-50km - the accuracy of the ANN unit with Aliexpress is high, since it corrects 30 + km of the path using the satellite.

      - a point lesion, here it is necessary to visually detect, get a special gun and begin to suppress signals. Again, this does not work against ANNs. But it’s impossible to drop the bomb on the remote control, yes.



      That is, in each detachment - there must be a person who 24 / 7 observes the sky and only does this. Even when the team is in battle, to start eating, he still has to watch the sky and keep his gun ready.

      In general, in Iraq, despite the large consignments of these rifles, urgently purchased, the Babakhs could not establish a fight with UAVs.
      1. 0
        30 July 2019 15: 02
        Quote: donavi49
        What are jammers?

        Ordinary.
        Quote: donavi49
        We invented a portable type portable nuclear reactor?

        By the way, the portable station for creating interference with radio fuses, quite old, weighs 11 kg.

        Quote: donavi49
        And this will not help in any way against the drones going to the ANN

        in such dimensions, the "drone going to the INS" will have an accuracy of plus or minus a couple of hundred meters. What, together with the microscopicity of the warhead, will make the device useless

        Quote: donavi49
        That is, in each unit - there must be a person who 24/7 watches the sky

        C-RAM systems are enough for this. Their radars have long learned to detect UAVs.
        1. +1
          30 July 2019 15: 42
          Well, this portable station has a very small coverage area. This is enough to kill mines with a radio fuse. But it’s not enough for the drone to fall ill at 40-50m altitude. And in the same stadium on DeZ - they bombed with 100 + m. And there were jammers that didn't help (also there were anti-aircraft guns and didn't help either). The greater the distance, the more power exponentially, because we do not live in a vacuum.
          1. -1
            30 July 2019 16: 31
            Quote: donavi49
            Well, this portable station has a very small coverage area.

            And her eyes are enough. Because the capacity of its battery is a thousand times greater than that of microdrons
            And if it will be a station on a car chassis?

            Quote: donavi49
            But it’s not enough for the drone to fall ill at 40-50m in height.

            You still tell that jammers. preventing the detonation of radio-controlled land mines, actually just sawing

            Quote: donavi49
            And there were jammers that didn't help

            Who told you that. that "didn't help"?
            1. +1
              30 July 2019 17: 01
              No, I just point out that the further you need to jam the signal, the more powerful the system should be. Therefore, there are no solid spheres at checkpoints even among all Americans.

              UAVs on the 60-100m can only be hit with small arms or targeted, that is, pointing the device at it.

              Who told you that. that "didn't help"?


              Data. It was




              Then an UAV with bombs flew in


              It became

              1. -2
                30 July 2019 17: 33
                Quote: donavi49
                No, I just point out that the further you need to jam the signal, the more powerful the system should be.

                As practice shows, UAV-kamikaze for successful use must be as close to the target. 8)))))))))))))) 0

                Quote: donavi49
                Then an UAV with bombs flew in

                It remains to compose. where were the same REP systems that "did not help"

                Quote: donavi49
                UAVs on the 60-100m can only be hit with small arms or targeted, that is, pointing the device at it.

                eight))))))
                The radio jamming range of the transmitter on the UAV (receiving control signals from the NPU)
                to 30 km
                Radio suppression range of ground-based receiver (data and telemetry channel)
                to 10 km
                Radio jamming range of the navigation receiver on the UAV
                not less than 40 km
                Range of setting misinforming interference to the navigation receiver on the UAV
                not less than 40 km


                Belarusians lie?
  4. +1
    30 July 2019 08: 13
    Some time ago, there were reports about the development of mini-UAVs launched from an anti-tank grenade launcher such as RPG-32 or RPG-29 ... By the way, from such RPGs it is possible to launch UAVs of both aircraft type and helicopter with coaxial propellers ... After the message about the use by the Israelis of a reconnaissance video camera with a parachute in the form factor of a 40 mm grenade grenade, there were proposals in the "free patents" of a video camera-helicopter (with coaxial screws ...) in the same form factor. (40 mm). As for the method of hitting a target (object) with miniature ammunition, that is, a suitable method: "master-slave"! By the way, this method is proposed in Russia! The essence is this: the "leading" mini-ammunition (projectile) is equipped with a "full-fledged" control system (homing) ... such an ammunition may not be equipped with an explosive charge (due to lack of space ...) "Slave" ammunition is equipped with a charge BB (striking elements ...) and an extremely simplified guidance system! Such ammunition must be "fired" in a "burst" (eg 1 "leader" + 4 "slaves" ...)
    1. sen
      +1
      30 July 2019 13: 29
      Well, yes, quickly deliver the UAV to the desired point, again saving fuel.
      In general, the idea is interesting. Something similar is implemented in "Tornado".
  5. +2
    30 July 2019 09: 06
    Doesn’t take off - if the drone has its own engines, then in the fig it also shoot from a grenade launcher / mortar?
    1. -1
      30 July 2019 09: 35
      Quote: Operator
      if the drone has its own engines, then in the fig it also shoot from a grenade launcher / mortar?

      Well, then, in your opinion, on a fig shot to the RPG-7, "fasten" an expelling (powder) charge, if it has a rocket engine !? Or ... there are many UAVs (with an engine! fellow ) are launched with the help of rocket boosters or, even, a rubber-loaded catapult?
      1. 0
        30 July 2019 11: 20
        Do not confuse warm with soft. A heavy drone needs a catapult or accelerator to lift off the ground at a sufficient speed. The presented concept, firstly, is lightweight, such a thing can be manually thrown into the air with sufficient force, and then everything will fly all by itself. Moreover, manual start less unmasks, but this is a first-line drone. Secondly, a small drone already has problems with volume, and it is spent on what any fighter can do, and even faster (get-turn-on-load-shoot is slower than getting-turn-on-throw).
        As a result, the manual launch drone 1. does not unmask the position, 2. has more charge (if it is with warheads) or may hang longer in the air (the amount spent on an additional battery).
        The concept of a shot from a 40 mm grenade launcher makes sense only for cheap (within $ 50-100) crafts that are made in the form factor of this shot (40 x 46 mm) and do not have their own engine, yes, the powder charge can throw such the drone is 200-300 meters up and to the side, and then the drone plans \ descends by parachute or somehow slows down its fall, but such a drone lives only a minute or two. Pays off its cheapness.
        1. 0
          30 July 2019 13: 28
          Quote: Tatoshi
          Do not confuse warm with soft

          Gospidya! We have to talk about famous things! Catapults tell the UAV its initial (!) Speed, regardless of whether it is heavy or light! As rockets have sustainer (!) And starting (!) Engines (or two-mode ...)! "Rubber" catapults are used to launch light and ultralight UAVs ... there are also pneumatic, electric catapults ...
          Launching a UAV with a grenade launcher ensures convenience and speed of launch! This ensures a sufficient initial speed for the drone!
          Launched from the shoulder a unique miniature aircraft TPK-7E is being developed in Russia. This reconnaissance drone will be transported in a container similar to a conventional hand grenade launcher.

          After starting, it automatically spreads composite wings. After that, for a long time it is able to conduct an overview of the terrain, developing in flight speed up to 200 km / h. The flight altitude is 5000 m. The preparation time for the drone to work is from 10 seconds to 2 minutes. Everything is determined by the way of management. If automatic mode is selected, the drone autonomously follows a predetermined route. When manual - the operator exercises control from a portable control tablet.

          The tablet will receive real-time video from a high-resolution camera installed on the UAV. When scouting at night, the operator can also receive a thermal image from an onboard night vision device with an uncooled matrix.
          In addition to two cameras - television and thermal imaging - the winged reconnaissance can be equipped with many other payloads, including a compact radar with a target detection range of up to 5 km, a communication repeater, and a target designation system for external percussion vehicles.

          It was reported that the device will acquire the ability to self-defeat targets, for which it will be armed with airborne ammunition.

          A sample of this unmanned aerial vehicle was demonstrated at a number of exhibitions, including the international military-technical forum "Army-2017"
          ,
        2. 0
          30 July 2019 17: 18
          Mistake The propellant charge to the drone has a bone ratio, and is not included in the mass and composition of the drone.
          1. 0
            31 July 2019 03: 28
            Quote: garri-lin
            The propellant charge to the drone is of a fundamental relationship, and the mass and composition of the drone is not included.

            Naturally! And who says the opposite?
            1. 0
              31 July 2019 10: 16
              This I do not you this previous. I did not like his statement that the propellant charge reduces the payload mass.
    2. 0
      30 July 2019 17: 16
      Why do airplanes from aircraft carriers launch a catapult? Huge fuel economy. And if the fuel on board is tens of grams or a dozen ampere hours, then saving it is right.
  6. 0
    30 July 2019 09: 56
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    on a fig shot to the RPG-7, "fasten" an expelling (powder) charge, if it has a rocket engine

    So that the exhaust gases from the rocket engine do not unmask the position of the grenade launcher and do not burn his face.
    1. 0
      30 July 2019 12: 51
      Quote: Operator
      Do not unmask the position of the grenade launcher and do not burn his face.

      "Liquid" your arguments! 1. Unmask the position? Nonsense! When the expelling powder charge is triggered, flame, smoke are still present! The rocket engine of the grenade is triggered near the grenade launcher, at a distance of 15 m from the grenade launcher.

      Worried about the grenade launcher's face? So you can slobber over RPGs, for example, a round shield (yes at least a square one, if you like it more!) ... or put on a gas mask (as the "Ofenror" arrows did!) ... if you don't like a gas mask, put on a semblance of it ...
      Just do not voice nonsense! And yet ... where are your "anti-arguments" to drones with rocket launch engines or to a "rubber" catapult?
      1. 0
        30 July 2019 13: 15
        Shaw, really quadrocopters are equipped with rocket and rubber starters? laughing
        1. 0
          30 July 2019 13: 36
          Quote: Operator
          Shaw, really quadrocopters are equipped with rocket and rubber starters?

          Yo mine! wassat But how to live on after such "communication"? what It was about the aircraft-type UAVs, as more high-speed, maneuverable, "long-range" ...
          1. 0
            30 July 2019 13: 37
            Have you read the article under discussion?
            1. 0
              30 July 2019 13: 52
              I just expanded the "scope" of the article a little! Because This topic is not, in itself, limited to "copters"!
              1. 0
                30 July 2019 14: 01
                And we discuss exclusively quadrocopters.

                PS To close the question: the RPG-7 grenade is accelerated in the launch tube to a speed of 145 m / s using a starting charge, after the grenade leaves the tube, it is accelerated to 300 m / s using a rocket engine. If the grenade was accelerated in the launch tube to a speed of 300 m / s, then the flame and smoke plume at the position of the grenade launcher would be four times larger (E = mv2).
                1. 0
                  30 July 2019 14: 55
                  Quote: Operator
                  To close the question: the RPG-7 grenade is accelerated in the launch tube to a speed of 145 m / s using a starting charge, after the grenade leaves the tube, it is accelerated to 300 m / s using a rocket engine. If the grenade was accelerated in the launch tube to a speed of 300 m / s, then the flame and smoke plume at the position of the grenade launcher would be four times larger (E = mv2).

                  Well, why all this "scribbling"? I just "casually" mentioned (!) RPG-7 in connection with the phrase: "It won't take off - if the drone has its own engines, then why should you shoot it with a grenade launcher / mortar?" .... do you know?
  7. 0
    30 July 2019 11: 51
    I misunderstood about the camera. Modern in the size of a pea. I recently picked up a good DVR, so there the whole filling is 10 or 15 grams. If without a battery.
  8. -1
    30 July 2019 12: 05
    I have only one question - why push the drone into the grenade launcher?
    what is it, just throwing can not start?
    I would prefer a device in the form of a hand grenade rather than an underbarrel.
    1. -1
      30 July 2019 13: 21
      For the same reason that the rocket has an upper stage. To save battery, it’s small there and for speed output to position.
      1. -1
        30 July 2019 13: 24
        a folding slingshot is better to use than a gutter.
        quieter, greener, unlimited launches.
        1. -2
          30 July 2019 13: 26
          A grenade can also be launched with a slingshot.
          1. 0
            30 July 2019 13: 36
            a grenade needs accuracy and range, and a slingshot does not guarantee it
            and the drone just needs 15-20 meters up
            1. -1
              30 July 2019 13: 38
              So this drone needs accuracy and range
              1. 0
                30 July 2019 13: 43
                I don’t think so, in my opinion, excessive TK
                you don’t put a helicopter propeller on your car to avoid traffic jams
                1. -1
                  30 July 2019 13: 44
                  This is not a car, this is a grenade with motors. And its creators decided that she needed accuracy and range.
                  1. 0
                    30 July 2019 13: 46
                    it is a grenade with a rather fragile mechanism, which, in my opinion, is contradictory.
                    1. -1
                      30 July 2019 13: 51
                      Fragile, one-time, short-lived, maybe even printed on a printer - just to blow and forget. (Although I wouldn’t get excited about the strength of modern composite materials.)
    2. 0
      31 July 2019 03: 59
      Quote: yehat
      Why push the drone in a grenade launcher?

      And if the drone is fired from a 105 mm grenade launcher (container)? The weight of the grenade (RPG-29) is -4,5 kg ... the weight of the brick is -4-4,2 kg. How far and how will you "throw" a brick? How will it "fly" with you? When launching a UAV from a grenade-type container, the UAV is given an initial speed, a direction with an orientation in space (i.e., like a rocket launch engine ...). It's another matter, indeed, with a miniature UAV ... especially in the "40-mm" form factor! In this case, you can "throw" with your hand or use "PU" like a crossbow ... but using, for example, a "grenade launcher" allows you to deliver a mini-drone to the area of ​​the intended target at a distance of several hundred meters (at least ...) without energy costs of the "apparatus", the supply of which is very limited ...
  9. 0
    30 July 2019 13: 53
    Quote: nesmeshimenya
    Although at the expense of the strength of modern composite materials, I would not get excited

    the drone must have a guidance head or optics. This is fragile.
    1. -1
      30 July 2019 14: 10
      So it will be seen how much this will hinder the application. The market will judge.
  10. 0
    30 July 2019 14: 44
    Germans are the coolest - BionicOpter by Festo AG




  11. 0
    30 July 2019 16: 17
    In principle, any quadrocopter can drop bombs without any alteration. As far as I know, they can all make a coup in the air. Now, if you put a body on it ...
  12. 0
    30 July 2019 23: 29
    Interesting topic. Barrage bullet 12 gauge is generally tin. Something from the tank do not pop out. :)