The pride of the Russian aviation industry. Sukhoi - 80 years

33
Today 80 turned Sukhoi Design Bureau - one of the best aircraft design offices in Russia, story whose leaves in the Soviet period. The legendary aircraft "Su", in demand worldwide, is the main product of the design bureau.





The first steps of the legendary KB


The end of the 1930s was a very serious and responsible period for our country. Industrialization was taking leaps and bounds: more and more enterprises were being built, new types of equipment, civil and military equipment were being produced. The Soviet leadership paid special attention to development aviation.

Understanding perfectly well that in a probable war, aviation will be destined to play one of the key roles, the Soviet leadership directed all its forces not only to strengthen the air force, but also to improve scientific and technological developments in the aircraft industry. 29 July 1939 was published a decree SNK USSR. In accordance with it, the brigade of aircraft designers of the Moscow Aviation Plant No. 156 was transferred to Kharkov, where they had to start mass production of Su-2 aircraft.

However, the history of the KB began, in fact, nine years earlier. In October, 1930, Pavel Osipovich Sukhoi, headed the brigade No. 4 of the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI), in which the formation of the design team began. Between 1930 and 1939 the designers developed the I-4 and I-14 serial fighters, the experienced I-8 and DIP fighters, the RD record aircraft (the famous flights of Valery Chkalov and Mikhail Gromov were made on it), the long-range bomber DB-2, the close bomber Su-2.

The pride of the Russian aviation industry. Sukhoi - 80 years


The first decade of existence of the design office fell on the most difficult and dramatic years. Two years after the establishment of the bureau, the Great Patriotic War began. But the designers evacuated to Perm continued their work. Only in the period from 1940 to 1942. 893 Su-2 were released, which successfully solved the combat missions assigned to them on the air front of the Great Patriotic War. After returning from the evacuation, the design bureau continued work in Tushino near Moscow.

The victory over Nazi Germany did not mean that the Soviet Union lost opponents. On the contrary, yesterday's allies in the anti-Hitler coalition, since 1946, have become a new probable collective enemy of the Soviet state. And in order to preserve the country's defense capability, more and more new solutions in the field of aircraft industry were required.

Throughout 1945-1949. the Sukhoi design bureau continued its work, then there was a short break from 1949 to 1953, when, after the accident of the Su-15 plane, the management decided to liquidate the design bureau. But in May 1953 of the year, two months after the death of Joseph Stalin, the work of the designers under the leadership of Sukhoi was restored - now they worked in the OKB-1, the production base of which was the 51 plant.

The father of the developer "Su"


The activity of any aircraft design bureau cannot be considered in isolation from the personality of the chief designer - a person who determines not only the direction of technical developments, but also the general line of development and work of the design bureau. Therefore, design offices are named after the names of their leaders: Tupolev, Ilyushin, Sukhoi.

The path of Pavel Osipovich Sukhoi to aviation began even before the revolution. He was born on July 22 1895 in the family of a teacher from a village school in the village of Glubokoe, Disna district, Vilna province, Russian Empire. When in the 1900 year, the father of the future aircraft designer Osip Andreevich was offered to head the school for the children of railway employees, the family moved to Gomel.

In the 1905 year, Paul entered the Gomel men's gymnasium, from which he graduated in 1914 with a silver medal. Already in the gymnasium years, Pavel Sukhoi became interested in aviation - many young men at that time were impressed by the flights of the aviator Sergei Utochkin, who also conducted his tours in Gomel.

Pavel wanted to enroll in the Imperial Higher Technical School in Moscow, where they taught the basics of aeronautics, but because of bureaucratic delays could not enroll (they refused to accept because they were copies, but not original documents). Then Pavel Sukhoi entered the mathematics department of Moscow University, and a year later he entered the Imperial Higher Technical School. There he joined the Aeronautics Circle, organized by Nikolai Zhukovsky.



When Pavel Sukhoi reached military age in 1915, he was mobilized for military service and sent to the Warrant Officer School. So Pavel Osipovich was on the Western Front, where he served in artillery. After the revolution, Sukhoi returned to Moscow, but found the school closed. Then Pavel returned to Gomel, for some time he worked as a teacher at a school in the town of Luninets in the west of Belarus, where he married a French teacher, Sofya Tenchinskaya.

But, fleeing the advancing Polish troops, the family returned to Gomel, and in 1921 Sukhoi went to Moscow to continue his studies at the Technical School. By this time, the teacher and senior friend of Pavel Sukhoi, Nikolai Zhukovsky, headed the Institute of Red Air Engineers Fleetand then the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute. But in March 1921, Zhukovsky died.

Sukhoi's diploma work was written under the leadership of Andrei Tupolev - the closest ally of Zhukovsky. In March, Sukhoi 1925 defended his diploma on the theme: "Single fighter with 300 engine horsepower." After that, as one would expect, Sukhoi continued work in the design bureau of Andrei Tupolev, became deputy chief designer, and then headed his design bureau.

The years of the Cold War. The golden age of "Su"


After the work of the Sukhoi Design Bureau was resumed in 1953, the designers under the leadership of Pavel Osipovich continued to work on various modifications of Su. Aircraft "Su" quickly became a real brand.

In September, the 1955 of the year for the first time took to the air the C-1 front-line fighter, and from 1957 of the year began its mass production under the name "Su-7". Over 15 years, more than 1800 Su-7 aircraft were produced. Fighter supplies have been established in 9 countries of the world. Then the T-3 fighter-interceptor was designed, which became the prototype of the Su-9 and Su-11 interceptors. Airplanes of this type during the 1960-s remained the fastest in the Soviet military aviation and were in service with the USSR Air Force until the 1980-s.

Then, in May 1962, the first flight was made by the all-weather interceptor T-58, which went into production as Su-15. It was released about 1500 aircraft of this type. In August, the first flight of the C-1966I was performed on 21 - this aircraft for the first time in the history of domestic aviation had a variable sweep wing. On the basis of the prototype, mass production of the Su-17 fighter-bomber began.



In 1962, work began on the creation of the long-range Sotka T-4 shock-reconnaissance complex in the Sukhoi Design Bureau. 22 August 1972, the first flight of a prototype was made. For the first time in the global aircraft industry, a welded airframe made of titanium and high-strength steels, a high-temperature hydraulic system of ultrahigh pressure, multi-cylinder hydraulic actuators of steering surfaces were used, an electric remote control system was installed.

Designers set the plane speed up to 3200 km / h. Such speed at that time was not only not one fighter in the world, but also the vast majority of guided missiles. It would seem that the success of the brainchild of Sukhoi was ensured. But in October 1974, the OKB was forced to stop testing the new aircraft. Already then it became known that the plane was competing with the developments of the Tupolev Design Bureau, which led to the decision of the higher instances to cease experimental flights.

15 September 1975 of the year in the sanatorium "Barvikha" died 80-year-old Pavel Osipovich Sukhoi - the chief designer and "symbol" of the Design Bureau named after him. After the death of Sukhoi, the design bureau was headed by E.A. Ivanov. OKB continued its work, improving technical developments. Su-17, Su-24, Su-25 aircraft and, finally, the first Su-27 modification were developed and tested. But after the death of four test pilots during testing of the Su-27, the new chief designer of the bureau was appointed M. P. Simonov.



In 1980, the bureau under the leadership of Simonov continued the development of combat training Su-27UB and Su-30, shock Su-34, multifunctional Su-35, deck Su-33. In addition to combat aircraft, the OKB launched the development and production of sport aircraft Su-26, Su-29, Su-31. It was on them that the Soviet and then the Russian teams received high awards at international aerobatics competitions.

When at the turn of 1980-x - 1990-x. against the background of the growing economic and political crisis, the Soviet leadership reduced the financing of the military-industrial complex, on the initiative of MP Simonov began the implementation of export programs for the Su-27. In particular, the first deliveries of this aircraft to China were made. It was thanks to the export contracts of the Sukhoi Design Bureau that continued to exist in the dramatic for the domestic industry of the nineties of the twentieth century.

Superdzhety and artificial heart


The development of civil aircraft began in the Sukhoi Design Bureau as early as the 1990s, precisely against the backdrop of a crisis in the defense industry and a reduction in funding. In 2001, the Su-80GP cargo and passenger aircraft and the Su-38L agricultural aircraft took off. When in 1999, the new CEO of the OKB became MA. Pogosyan, structural changes were made in the OKB. In 2000, a subsidiary of Sukhoi Civil Aircraft was established.

In the civil division of the OKB, the design of a new civil aircraft for the needs of domestic passenger aviation began. 19 May 2008 for the first time a prototype of the Superjet SSJ-100 aircraft flew into the sky, and since April 2011, regular operation of this aircraft began.



What is interesting, besides the strictly aviation subject matter, the Sukhoi Design Bureau was noted, moreover, since the 1960-ies, and in the medical field. Back in 1960, the USSR Health Minister Boris Petrovsky turned to Pavel Sukhoi with a request to help develop an artificial heart - a pneumo-hydraulic pump that could temporarily replace a heart for a person until a donor heart was installed.

Currently, the design bureau continues to develop combat aircraft, including the development and modernization of the PAK FA (a promising front-line aviation complex), fighters of the Su-27 and Su-30 families, attack aircraft of the Su-25 family.

Speaking about the technical achievements of the Sukhoi design bureau, it is worth noting that in the history of its existence the team created about 100 aircraft types, more than 60 of which went into mass production. The total number released in the series of Sukhoi aircraft is more than 10 thousands of copies. Airplanes were delivered and are being delivered to 30 states of the world.

The Sukhoi Design Bureau remains the pride of the domestic aircraft industry. Years and decades pass, twenty years remain until the centennial jubilee, and the design office, created in the distant thirties, continues to work for the good of our country, strengthening its defense capability, contributing to the development and improvement of the domestic economy.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    29 July 2019 14: 23
    Good luck and new world's best Su cars good
  2. +4
    29 July 2019 14: 33
    Congratulations to all OKB! Great new projects!
  3. -9
    29 July 2019 15: 05
    Tell me what's new in Russia (RF)? This is the pride of the Soviet, not Russian aviation industry. Or are they proud that they did not get their hands on optimizing?
    1. -3
      29 July 2019 15: 29
      Quote: Gardamir
      Pride of the Soviet aircraft industry. “Sukhoi” is 80 years old

      absolutely for sure! no need to appropriate the creation of previous generations! soldier
      1. 0
        29 July 2019 17: 59
        absolutely for sure!

        Well, yes, you need to sprinkle ash on your head and sing mantras about a gas station.
        And of course, designers, technologists worked so much, workers made one model after another, were proud of it, and then peppers in the Bialowieza Forest realized for three and ALREADY BE Proud.
    2. 0
      29 July 2019 16: 03
      Quote: Gardamir
      This is the pride of the Soviet, not Russian aviation industry.

      And the Su-57 is also Soviet?
      There are no 20 years of the Soviet Union and you all think that during this time a new generation of engineers and designers has not grown? Were the teachers bad?
      1. +2
        29 July 2019 16: 46
        And the Su-57 is also Soviet?

        In the late 1980s, the Air Force of the USSR (with the leading role of 30 Central Research Institute) developed requirements for a fifth-generation fighter for front-line aviation to replace the MiG-29 and Su-27. Based on these requirements, MiG RSK developed the project 1.44, and Sukhoi Design Bureau developed the Su-47 Berkut. The collapse of the USSR and the economic recession that followed did not allow further work on the creation of the aircraft, project 1.44 was later closed due to the cessation of funding, and the Su-47 Berkut began to be used as a flying laboratory
        In May 2001, the Russian Air Force launched a program to develop a 5th generation fighter - a promising frontline aviation complex (PAK FA). The preliminary draft was being prepared in the second half of 2001 - early 2002. To create the PAK FA, Rosaviakosmos and the RF Ministry of Defense developed a comprehensive target program approved by the RF government in December 2002. It defines the main contractor (SUE "AVPK" Sukhoi ") and the timing of the main stages of work. A complex of R&D and preliminary design began, which was supposed to be completed by submitting a draft design by the beginning of 2004. The initial budget of the project was 1,5 billion rubles RSK MiG and OKB named after Yakovlev were involved in the implementation of the program The work plan provided for the start of flight tests of the aircraft in 2006-2007 and the beginning of deliveries of aircraft to the troops by 2014-2015.
        Some Su-47 and MiG 1.44 technologies were used in the project. In 2004, the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin was shown the layout of the aircraft
        On August 11, 2017, the commander of the Russian Aerospace Forces Viktor Bondarev for the first time officially announced the serial name of the fighter known as the T-50 - the aircraft received the designation Su-57.
        1. +2
          29 July 2019 17: 16
          Clear. Please, please tell us what kind of on-board computers were there then? Is all the electronics from there too? Engines are also from the 80s? Yes, many more questions arise.
          You know, here’s what’s coming to mind. In the USSR in the mid 30s there was also no industrialization. After all, after 17 years, 30 years have passed too. Judging by your logic, everything that was then being built was the entire legacy of the tsarist regime?
          1. +3
            29 July 2019 18: 21
            computers
            1985-1987 we already had computers in the AOSI classes.
            Trying to humiliate the Union, you again praise the West.
            1. -5
              29 July 2019 19: 44
              Quote: Gardamir
              1985-1987 at the AOSI classes we already had computers

              Computer dimensions do not tell me what were?
              And the speed of work and power and software are all from the 80s?
              1. +5
                29 July 2019 19: 57
                And speed and power
                You are too strict. because I was only a student. I can say that the monitor was approximately like in the late 90s, the system unit is horizontal. The recording went to a regular audio cassette and it is clear that all this was in text-digital, naturally no graphics.
                1. -5
                  29 July 2019 20: 04
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  I can say that the monitor was approximately like in the late 90s, the system unit is horizontal. The recording went to a regular audio cassette and it is clear that all this was in text-digital, naturally no graphics.

                  I assembled such a computer myself. It was called "Zet Spectrum". I can hardly imagine what he can do in the Su-57
                  1. +3
                    29 July 2019 20: 51
                    The processor from the ZX Spectrum was on the American Apollo. So he can count a little.
          2. +2
            29 July 2019 19: 39
            By the way, I wonder what element base is used on the Su 57, our development or is it still licensed? Can someone tell? I remember that on the MiG 31 there were such microcircuits ... As one of the REOshnikov said, our microcircuits are the largest microcircuits in the world!
            1. -5
              29 July 2019 19: 53
              Quote: Andrey Sukharev
              By the way, I wonder what element base is used on the Su 57, our development or is it still licensed?

              Yes, most likely its own.
              They know how to do it when it does it.
              We had in the 80s on a business trip at the factory one guy from the factory where they made radio components. So he said that the military came first and selected the best parts. Those with characteristics that were slightly worse were taken by the manufacturers. Well, all the rest went to the national economy. That is, on TVs, receivers and other household electrical appliances. Therefore, with good televisions, according to the scheme, there were breakdowns in details.
              I don’t remember where I read, but the Americans were amazed that lamps were still used on the MiG-25.
              Someone wrote on the site that one pilot made such a comparison between the Su-27 and Su-57. Not literally, but in fact it sounded like that. It's like a gigabyte floppy disk and flash drive
              1. 0
                29 July 2019 22: 04
                As for the lamps on the MiG-25. Blocks performed their functions. Naturally, they required high-voltage power, in contrast to semiconductor elements. And yet - under the conditions of the use of nuclear weapons, all semiconductor circuits die instantly from radiation, and it does not interfere with the lamps to work.
                1. 0
                  29 July 2019 22: 09
                  Quote: Aviator_
                  Blocks performed their functions.

                  And I'm talking about it. When it was necessary, our engineers and designers made sweets from ...
                  And I remembered more. The Americans were amazed how we made sure that the lamps did not pop out of the sockets. Well, you remember how in old TVs they were pressed by springs). So they didn’t seem to think of this)
          3. +5
            29 July 2019 19: 41
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Clear. Please, please tell us what kind of on-board computers were there then? Is all the electronics from there too? Engines are also from the 80s?

            Tell us what computers and where are they from now? What element base? Whose monitors and indicators? And about engines at all is not necessary. He is practically from there. Stage 2 engine, in your opinion there is no Russian. In the gland there is, but in fact not. How does it work, does it work. So you shouldn't be talking about the Union. Moreover, since the beginning of the XNUMXs, or even earlier, the education reform has been in full swing. The consequence of which should be a new person. Qualified consumer. Fursenko said so. These consumers will come into life and start ... Either consume <somewhere in the Sukhoi Design Bureau. Or create at the level of consumption. These will be purely Russian developments.
            1. -2
              29 July 2019 20: 11
              Quote: Antique
              Tell us which computers are coming from now?

              Are you talking about mine, or which one on SU?
              Engine 2 stages, in your Russian no. In iron is, but in fact not.

              By what fact?
              You will not throw off a reference to the "fact"?
              The consequence of which should be a new person. Qualified consumer.

              So the plane did old shots? How old are they now? And didn’t they teach anything young?
              And further. Here you give a "non-consumer" a set of details and propose to do something, can you imagine what happens?
              So in vain you are so about the Union.

              About the Union is you. By your logic, the experts of the old school did not teach the young anything?
          4. +1
            30 July 2019 09: 01
            As for the computers that were then, I highly recommend that you go at least to Vika and read the article for a start https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onboard_digital_computer_computer_This time. For example, our enterprise (NIISA, Minsk) widely used onboard digital computers of various models, originally developed for use on airplanes, in their ground highly mobile ACCS * Maneuver "," Etalon ". These are two.
            In particular, as part of the NIISA developed at the beginning of the 70x post for processing radar information PORI P2, the aircraft BCNM A15 was used, which could operate continuously like a clock for several days without a single malfunction.
            There were, of course, disadvantages in this car. In particular, it required, as far as I remember, programming in Assembler and hard-coded firmware of commands in memory, which led to increased laboriousness when developing software and its changes. But this also ensured the highest reliability of the machine in very difficult operating conditions. And this machine was made entirely on the domestic element base. And peripheral devices were made on the same base. There was no other. And although the final product (KShM, PU) in terms of size was more foreign counterparts, but at the same time it pretty well provided a solution to the tasks.
            What am I doing? And to the fact that already in the USSR there was a well-developed electronic industry, which produced a wide range of integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from which quite modern instruments and systems for various purposes were created at that time.
        2. 0
          29 July 2019 18: 04
          Have you read your link?
          In May, the 2001 Russian Air Force launched the 5th generation fighter

          and if you're talking about
          The project used some technologies Su-47 and MiG 1.44.


          And in 47 some technologies were not used 27?
          And at the seventeenth of the seventeenth, and at the seventh of the seventh?
          And there, not long before the conclusion that all the power of the USSR from tsarist Russia .....
          Your obstinacy is simply amazing; Lenin was probably the one who called ossified dogmatists, and it was they who contributed a lot to the collapse of the USSR.
        3. 0
          30 July 2019 08: 09
          It's funny!
          Have you ever seen 1.44 and the Berkut? Of course, after 30 years have passed, you can write them down in the "5th". But where is the cruising supersonic? Where is the stealth? Where are the internal bays?
          For 1.44 I will not say (well, you can see everything there ...), but what is now called "Berkut" was originally an aircraft demonstrating the capabilities of a forward-swept wing, "our answer to the X-29". The answer came out very long and extremely belated. And it was a dead end!
          Initially, the Berkut had nothing in common with the American G5 (since it was started to design even before the formation of this concept in the USA), but it is possible that some developments from it to the future Su-57 migrated (for example, production technology composite wing box), but the ideology of the Su-57 is completely different!
          So the Su-57 is a full-fledged Russian development. But how successful it is is time will tell. (SuperJet, for example, is very hard going ...)
          And if we talk about the "Soviet trace", the layout of the Su-57 was created under the influence of ideas ... Bartini!
      2. +1
        30 July 2019 01: 55
        Quote: Lipchanin
        And the Su-57 is also Soviet?
        There are no 20 years of the Soviet Union and you all think that during this time a new generation of engineers and designers has not grown? Were the teachers bad?

        Well, how can I tell you - among my familiar engineers of the Russian defense industry, the majority are deeply behind 70, and this is precisely the old Soviet design school, not Russian; and it is precisely on them that production capacities have been and continue to be. But their now working young colleagues - even those who are about 40, well, as it were, are far from reaching their level (about the younger ones who are 20-30 years old and have nothing to say). And this is not in my amateurish opinion, but the opinion of old engineers.
        1. +2
          30 July 2019 04: 56
          Well, how can I tell you - among my familiar engineers, the Russian defense industry is over 70 for the majority, and this is precisely the old Soviet design school, not Russian; and it was precisely on them that production capacities were and are being held.

          Well, do not tell. I myself work in this environment, so to speak, and I can say that there are technical minds. There are pros and cons for each generation IMHO. The older ones are more pragmatic and purposeful, with high self-motivation. But it is sometimes too conservative. Sometimes to the point of absurdity. Younger more creative ones can come up with good ideas, but they are difficult to finalize. Yes, and motivation for the result is lame. Something like this
    3. +3
      30 July 2019 04: 49
      Gardamir Yesterday, 15: 05
      Tell me what's new in Russia (RF)? This is the pride of the Soviet, not Russian aviation industry. Or are they proud that they did not get their hands on optimizing?

      what nonsense are you writing? All evolution is developing sequentially, including technical. And it develops based on the experience of previous generations. This is NORMAL practice! Or do you see in your indefatigable badherd that each subsequent generation should reinvent the wheel ???
  4. +2
    29 July 2019 21: 21
    Superjet - a horse scam that did not give anything to aviation. More useful would be the modernization of the Tu 154 and Yak 40-42 under Western engines. Faster, cheaper and more suitable for our airfields.
    1. +2
      29 July 2019 22: 06
      Superjet is called "superbudget". Poghosyan killed a fully certified Tu-334 for his product.
  5. 0
    29 July 2019 22: 09
    Virtually nothing is said about the Su-25, the model of which I first saw as a student in the fall of 1975 of the year in the wind tunnel of the T-102 TsAGI.
  6. 0
    29 July 2019 22: 13
    OKB Sukhoi remains the pride of the domestic aircraft industry.

    But what about the MIG firm, didn't the Americans beat North Korea instantly? Isn't that a moment of war with Jews in the Middle East? Weren't the blasts most massive warplanes?
    And where is MIG now? It seems to me that they drowned it specially, not without the help of the leaders of the Sukhoi firm.
    1. +1
      29 July 2019 22: 54
      But what about the MIG firm, didn't the Americans beat North Korea instantly? Isn't that a moment of war with Jews in the Middle East? Weren't the blasts most massive warplanes?

      So, what is next ? Sorry, you can write about YAK, TU, IL, etc.
      And where is MIG now? It seems to me that they drowned it specially, not without the help of the leaders of the Sukhoi firm.

      How drowned tell me, dry in the 90-00x survived only thanks to the export of the Su-30 to India ... Or did the dry specialists buy the Indians? lol
      1. 0
        29 July 2019 22: 57
        It is a pity that in the USSR there were such companies as YAK, IL, TU and MIG, and in Russia there was only one - SU. Why didn’t the state support these firms, why are we flying Boeing, Airbus and even some Fokkers?
        And because there were no real statesmen in the power, but there were and are incompetent leaders.
        1. 0
          29 July 2019 23: 11
          Why didn’t the state support these companies, why are we flying Boeing, Airbus and even some Fokkers?

          Because there was a coup and the USSR is no more, all firms are now surviving as the state can no longer support anyone, it will buy at least something to provide weapons and that’s joy, thank God for 30 years that we have at least one thing for these 30 years the aircraft building design bureau was able to survive, while at least trying to produce something at the level of the latest world innovations, it was at least 20 years behind them ...
          And because there were no real statesmen in the power, but there were and are incompetent leaders.

          Leaders are competent, only now they are working in their own pocket, and not for the good of the state, and this trend will not change in the near future
        2. 0
          30 July 2019 02: 01
          Quote: Fan-Fan
          Why didn’t the state support these companies, why are we flying Boeing, Airbus and even some Fokkers?

          Because in the USSR there was no reserve for economical aircraft engines; Well, did not reckon with fuel consumption and all. As the economy of the socialist model grunted and had to float out on old developments, without R&D, that's all. And even today, Russian aircraft construction is considered to be excellent in terms of glider, partly in terms of avionics, but very weak in terms of engine building (yes, it’s not a shame, but Western engines are more efficient and much more economical). Therefore, we fly in civilian life on Western aircraft in the main. And the epic with Sukhoi Superjet so far ended in zilch and many disasters.