The latest American "strategist" B-21 Raider will fly in December 2021 of the year

Northrop Grumman, the newest US forward-looking strategic bomber B-21 Raider, will make its first flight at the beginning of December 2021. Reports about it "Nplus1" with reference to The Drive.

The newest strategic bomber B-21 Raider is being developed in the interests of the US Air Force since 2015, when Northrop Grumman received a contract to create it. Two years later, in the spring of 2017, it was announced the completion of the outline design of the aircraft, after which the stage of creating flight samples began. It is emphasized that, starting from the first flight model, the aircraft will receive systems and software for delivering nuclear strikes. However, in the first few years of service, aircraft will not be certified for the transportation and use of strategic weapons.

As the Deputy Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Stephen Wilson, stated, the first flight of a promising bomber will take place at Edwards Air Force Base in California in early December 2021.

The new bomber was created according to the "flying wing" scheme. Its exact dimensions have not yet been disclosed, but it is known that it will be smaller than the American "strategist" V-2 and larger than the deck drone project UCLASS, the length / wingspan of which is 21 / 52,4 and 11,6 / 18,9 meters, respectively.

The United States Air Force Command expects the first B-21 Raider bombers to go into service in the middle of the 2020's. According to the available information, it is planned to purchase at least one hundred new aircraft, which should gradually replace the outdated strategic bombers B-52 Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit.

The first B-21 Raider will serve at Ellsworth Air Base in South Dakota.

Comments

[NEXUS]

Northrop Grumman, the newest US forward-looking strategic bomber B-21 Raider, will make its first flight at the beginning of December 2021. Reports about it "Nplus1" with reference to The Drive.

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

[Sky strike fighter]

And what will the B-21 Raider have so much besides Stealth technology?

[sabakina]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

And what will the B-21 Raider have so much besides Stealth technology?

The plane of the Russian pancake. Well, judging by the photo ...

[kotdavin4i]

Quote: sabakina

Well, judging by the photo ...

So in the photo B-2 is ordinary ..

[sabakina]

Quote: kotdavin4i

So in the photo B-2 is ordinary ..

Irons do not fly.

[pytar]

"Irons don't fly."
Flying irons! Now I have seen everything.

[Masha]

flying ... floating .. everything has a place to be ...

whatever the child would be amusing ...

[KVU-NSVD]

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

And what will the B-21 Raider have so much besides Stealth technology?

Probably, it will finally be able to shoot missiles with special stuffing, and not just drop bombs .. Actually, because of this feature, the B-52 fleet is still "afloat", so to speak. Well, as usual, the usual American Wishlist about reducing the cost of maintenance. Those. They want to get a reliable, relatively inexpensive stealth missile carrier and write off the rest of the motley fleet of strategists, because the 52s do not last forever. Let's see what happens this time - after all, after the B-52, they haven't managed to create anything successful in this area yet.

[Starover_Z]

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Quote: Sky Strike fighter

And what will the B-21 Raider have so much besides Stealth technology?

Probably finally it will be able to shoot missiles with a special missile.

This is for sure, since the dimensions are less than B-2. And it will not fly too close despite the vaunted stealth technology.

[Lopatov]

Quote: KVU-NSVD

Probably finally it will be able to shoot missiles with a special missile, and not just drop bombs

This is unlikely
It looks like a "replacement" F-117 is being created, which was only a fighter in name.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Spade

It looks like a "replacement" F-117 is being created, which was only a fighter in name.

So the Goblin was not a "flying wing", but rather a pyramid from Cheops.
And then, after all, it’s said - to replace the B-52 ... Well, how much can you already abuse the old man?

[Lopatov]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

So the Goblin was not a "flying wing", but rather a pyramid from Cheops.

What's the difference.

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

And then, after all, it was said - to replace the B-52 ...

Replacement may be different. For example, U-2 was actually replaced by UAVs.

[dirk182]

Superfood EW. Well, as they wrote. Like how he can almost fly with impunity over us and sow democracy. Stealth advanced) that is, the plane will not be visible. The pilot will only be visible against the sky)

[Boa kaa]

Quote: dirk182

that is, the plane will not be visible. The pilot will only be visible against the sky)

So they were late: judging by the drawing, they have been in service with us for a long time!

[Peter Romane]

Edges will be sharpened. You can shave it. )))

[777-3-59-97]

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

Wow! As if the story of the Su-57 read.

[sabakina]

Quote: 777-3-59-97

Wow! As if the story of the Su-57 read.

Does the SU-57 have a story? IL-2 is, LaGg-5 is, PE-2 is, even MiG-21 is. Maybe you also need a work book?

[Vol4ara]

Quote: sabakina

Quote: 777-3-59-97

Wow! As if the story of the Su-57 read.

Does the SU-57 have a story? IL-2 is, LaGg-5 is, PE-2 is, even MiG-21 is. Maybe you also need a work book?

Replace the word "story" with "story" and everything will become clear

[Avis-bis]

Quote: sabakina

LaGg-5 has

He doesn’t. He himself is not.

[sabakina]

And what is there?

Quote: Avis-bis

Quote: sabakina

LaGg-5 has

He doesn’t. He himself is not.

[Avis-bis]

Quote: sabakina

And what is there?

Quote: Avis-bis

Quote: sabakina

LaGg-5 has

He doesn’t. He himself is not.

LaGG is. LaGG-3 is. La-5 is. LaGg-5 - no.

[vadim dok]

SU 57 HAS A STORY OF CREATION, but so far there is no history of application.

[Observer2014]

vadim dok (Marusev)

SU 57 HAS A STORY OF CREATION, but so far there is no history of application.

Su 57 was used in Syria a couple of years ago. Therefore, we will be fair. There is experience. But diplomatically, let's say a little.

[Catfish]

That is what Soviet education means, without labor - nowhere! Pour depending on the experience.

[1976AG]

Quote: 777-3-59-97

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

Wow! As if the story of the Su-57 read.

Let's not forget that the creation of the Su-57 was at a time when the entire military-industrial complex had to be lifted from the ruins

[NEXUS]

Quote: 777-3-59-97

Wow! As if the story of the Su-57 read.

Seriously? And the story of the creation and refinement of the F-22 do not want to remember, no?

[777-3-59-97]

And the history of the creation and refinement of F-22 do not want to remember, no?

No I do not want to.

[quote]

Quote: 777-3-59-97

And the history of the creation and refinement of F-22 do not want to remember, no?

No I do not want to.

And what, will begin to feel sick?

[WILL]

Well, they kind of wrote that they plan to order at least a hundred planes ... a hundred Strategists is quite a lot. And how much it costs, there is no information in the article.

[NEXUS]

Quote: 777-3-59-97

No I do not want to.

And so, dear? It is better to spit all the way towards 57, and not 22, apparently for you.

Quote: ANIMAL

Well, they kind of wrote that they plan to order at least a hundred planes ..

B-2 also planned a large series. As a result, 20 boards and, today it is not clear how many are in combat condition. And this bomber a priori will not be cheap. And that means about 100 cars are fairy tales, and not for a smart electorate.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: ANIMAL

And how much it costs, there is no information in the article.

Alexey Sanych!
Well, if the Spirit (Ghost-Spirit) B-2 was worth 1 billion dollars ... then the "granddaughters", presumably, will pull at least 1,5. This is so offhand. But in fact, maybe all 2 will come out: appetite comes with eating!

[WILL]

Yes, at such a cost, it is difficult to make a forecast by quantity.
It seems that initially in those tasks it was about $ 300 million. Appetite grows with food!

[Olenka velikaya]

Quote: NEXUS

Northrop Grumman, the newest US forward-looking strategic bomber B-21 Raider, will make its first flight at the beginning of December 2021. Reports about it "Nplus1" with reference to The Drive.

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

What do you think our developments do not bring to mind, or does everyone live in a fairy tale? immediately released and no need to update, process data and improve

[NEXUS]

Quote: Olenka velikaya

What do you think our developments do not bring to mind, or does everyone live in a fairy tale?

Dear, given the complexity and price of this device, even the development of the F-22 and SU-57 are not nearby in complexity. While B-2 costs more than 2 lards apiece.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: NEXUS

While B-2 costs more than 2 lards apiece.

Andrew, hello!
Without the filling of B-2, there is 1 lard. And with full forcemeat for combat use, as much as 2,1 lard! (more precisely - 2 billion 100 million 300 thousand, according to NSIAD-97-181).
Therefore, you are most likely right. Will make about 30 pieces or so. And they will say that 1 is as effective as 3 B-2. So there will be a "compromise" for everyone.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

Andrew, hello!

Hi Sasha!

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

They will make 30 pieces or so. They will say that 1 is as efficient as 3 B-2.

Sasha, at the exit it may well happen that this rider will turn out to be more expensive than Spirit. And even if it makes mattresses cheaper than B-2, I don’t think much. And therefore, a series of 100 Riders is how to declare that F-35 will be mass-produced, in the amount of 50 thousand pieces.

[bald]

Dig deeper, Mom didn’t tell everything. Their system of development and implementation is being destroyed, they are mired ... by the way, although we are striding, we are confident in tone. Andrey, again KB issues are not resolved by those. You're with the concept and about science, respectively, according to the military commissar.

[NEXUS]

Quote: bald

Andrew, again, the KB issues are not resolved by those. You're with the concept and about science, respectively, according to the military commissar.

Vladimir, we solve problems as they arise. And given the budget deficit, something must be sacrificed. Sitting on the pope 30 years has not gone away. And we need to catch up on all defense issues, which requires a defense budget many times more than it is now.

[Antipatr]

Factor of? And the face (mug, muzzle, mug) will not crack? Well, march to the Budget Rule! In the country, 12% go to the toilet on the street, not counting those who go for themselves, retirees are sitting on macaroons, and he is at you - at times to him! Mauger, and six aircraft carriers lay?
Vladimir Lysova. Hmmm ... curious.

[viktorR]

12% go to the outhouse on the street

- You're firing pan :)

[Antipatr]

No, I read. For example, this:
https://m.9111.ru/questions/777777777250457/

[viktorR]

Yes, everything is simple for me, all the inhabitants of the country of the victorious Maidan who called me a traitor (I am from Sevastopol) with whom I talked in chat roulette over the past couple of months have voiced the same thing. Volnov and Karpov told them about this (I advise you to google information about these people). Conclusions beg, say so.

[freejack]

12% go to the outhouse on the street

What was the cutest ???
The people calmly adversary promising bomber - the iron is discussing ...
And this is what got out of the Department of Statistics of Municipal Production?

[bald]

Sorry I will add, one of us has done it !!! - Interest in implementation and further work

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

What do you want? Are you paying taxes in the USA?
Yes, even if they have been tested for at least a hundred years, and then they will refuse it altogether.
Why count the money of the Americans?

[NEXUS]

Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi

What do you want? Are you paying taxes in the USA?

If the mattresses did not threaten us, then at least let the mushrooms grow on their heads, it would not matter. And where is the US taxpayer money?

[Dangerous]

Yes, no one is threatening us, stop watching the first channel already.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Dangerous

Yes, no one is threatening us, stop watching the first channel already.

You tell this to your doctor Brainworm, dear. Especially about the fact that NATO bases, somehow doing something near our borders, despite the fact that Reagan swore swore that NATO would not move an inch to the east. Apparently this is done from a special peace. Yes, even the whole world declares that we are a threat to US national security No. 1. Sometimes you need to turn on your head, dear, and not sit here to be clever.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Dangerous

No one is threatening us

Pancake! Colleague, urgently change your nickname to "SAFE" and hang an avatar with a "duckweed swamp". There will be the most THAT!

[Svetlana]

>>>> And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years <<
The usual story. As technology develops, it will not be modernized for 15 years, but for 50 years - 70-100.

[Monster_Fat]

Yes, that's right: in the US, the FIFTH GENERATION bomber will be "finished for a few more years," and in Russia they will sew hats for hurray patriots.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Monster_Fat

Yes, that's right: in the United States, the FIFTH GENERATION bomber will "continue for a few more years."

Yes they will, dear mattress.

Quote: Monster_Fat

and in Russia they’ll sew a hat for cheers-patriots.

And in Russia they calmly bring what we now need, despite the fact that the defense budget is several times smaller. Well, yes, you are sleeping and seeing, so that you can stick your fucking democracy somewhere else, with drugs, poverty and freedom.

[Monster_Fat]

Yes, yes, you say everything correctly: the budget of Russia, according to the "budget rule", is not sent to Western banks and is not invested in "Western securities", but is spent exclusively for the benefit of the country (there are even "national programs to combat poverty" - how! ) and the development of its economy and armed forces. Russia is a steadily developing state with an average wage of 500-550 (in the reports of the "truthful" Rosstat like: someone ate a chicken, and the other just looked at how he eats, but according to Rosstat, they both ate half a chicken ... ) US dollars, in which half of the population can not afford to buy a second pair of shoes and 75% of the population receive a salary which is barely enough for a minimum of products until the next salary. But in the USA it’s much worse, one poverty, drugs (greetings to Russia, will the Duma get beer out of alcohol legislation soon? ), and the freedom to be homeless, yes. And in general, the dollar will soon "collapse", and Ukraine will freeze, go around the world, go bankrupt, empty (underline the necessary) ...

[Antipatr]

For drugs and poverty, you are not in last place! And in freedom - to torture with impunity, toss drugs, put in bottles, blow up houses, steal billions - also ahead of the rest.
After the war, the Germans also lamented: "Oh, we worked conscientiously for ourselves, voted for the Fuhrer - he built roads, won unemployment, but Maidanek, Buchenwald - no, they did not see ..."

[NEXUS]

Quote: Lbt2103

And that poverty has already won over here?

And show me the country where they fight with it ...

[Sky strike fighter]

Quote: Lbt2103

And that poverty has already won over here?

Tell me at least one country in which she was defeated.

[Local from the Volga]

How quickly everyone forgets everything .... With a drunk, you would have been pierced by a belly, while you were in the queue for the exchange of the last 100 dollars at 98m! Or marveled at the tanks in the center of the capital at 93m scorching the building of the Government of the Russian Federation! Or to the boys of soldiers who confused the sight with a shutter at AK in Grozny! Sits here about hats and talks about the fifth generation of the Hohenzollern!

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: NEXUS

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

I do not know what will come of it, and when, but the fact that six years after receiving the development task the first sample will fly off is impressive.

[Victoria-V]

Impressive - not the right word. For post-Soviet aviation engineers, this seems impossible. They seem to pay well, but other reasons will not allow us to catch up with the United States in the next 10-15 years. Most importantly, it will definitely fly (99%) on Friday, December 3, 2021. 1%, a little earlier. And to spray with envy, like some commentators, is not good.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Victoria-In

It seems that they pay well, but other reasons will not allow us to catch up with the United States in the coming 10-15 years.

If it does not: share your view on these reasons. It is interesting to know the depth of awareness of the situation in our UAC.

[Victoria-V]

It will be difficult. I'm sorry. Chatterbox - a godsend for the FSB. Listen to Bondarev, Borisov, Kladov and others carefully ...

[spirit]

I bet the raider will fly, but the B-52 Stratofortress will never be removed from service,

[armata_armata]

B-52

They won’t remove it. It is extremely convenient for delivering bombing attacks anywhere in the world where they have already managed to deliver air defense, and does this with minimal cost.

[Antipatr]

However, like the Tu-95.

[Masha]

Quote: spirit

I bet that the raider will fly

that’s flying, not flying that’s the question ...
It is worth it
Succumb to the blows of fate,
Or need to resist
And in a mortal battle with a whole sea of ​​troubles
Do away with them?
sorry a few parsnip paraphrased ...

[sabakina]

Quote: Masha

sorry a few parsnip paraphrased ...

Come on ... Personally, I still do not understand ...

[Masha]

and Pasternak changed, just a little bit of Shakespeare ....

[1976AG]

you are a romantic person, Masha)

[Masha]

let me take it as a compliment ...

[1976AG]

Quote: Masha

let me take it as a compliment ...

exactly )

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Masha

sorry a few parsnip paraphrased ..

Masha, and Borya was not original ... at William, Shakespeare, he stole and put it on a rhyme in Russian ... BRIEF!

So the designs die with scope,
In the beginning promised success,
From long delays.
But enough!
Ophelia! Oh joy!
Remember My sins in your prayers, nymph.

Source: https://vikent.ru/enc/6272/

[Masha]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

Borya was not original ... at William, Shakespeare, he stole and put it on a rhyme in Russian ... BRILLIANT!

I just expressed myself more or less correctly - "altered"

[Lord of the Sith]

It is planned to have the B-52H in service until the age of 83 by 2040, until the exhaustion of the resource glider.

[g1washntwn]

Quote: Sith Lord

It is planned to have the B-52H in service until the age of 83 by 2040

And in 2040 and to the United States, some kind of "pension reform" and Rosstat agents will come

[Lord of the Sith]

Well, American economists themselves expect a "super crisis" this fall. I thought last year in December will be, well, or in January of this year. But they managed to hold back stock markets and even inflate.

[atalef]

Quote: Sith Lord

Well, American economists themselves are expecting a "super crisis" this fall.

Shaw already?
Can I link to the original?

Quote: Sith Lord

I thought last year in December will be, well, or in January of this year

of course .
America and the geyropa were about to die yesterday.
it was in 17 that grandfather Lenin spoke.

[Lord of the Sith]

Alexander, well enough to be weird then. These articles and statements come out almost every week. Here is the hodgepodge about the economy
https://aftershock.news/?q=node/773939

[atalef]

Quote: Sith Lord

Alexander, well enough to be weird then. These articles and statements come out almost every week.

soot.
Once, Sergey, wait for the crisis - the next one.
An alarming suitcase has been standing at the door for many years.

Quote: Sith Lord

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/773939

[Lord of the Sith]

But fresh
https://ria.ru/20190726/1556883212.html

[atalef]

Quote: Sith Lord

https://ria.ru/20190726/1556883212.html

Sergey, hi, all this is nothing.
Crises in the economy happen with an enviable periodicity, and this correctly and inevitably introduces corrections into the economy and schools of managers.
Nothing wrong with that.
Do not wait for the death of the United States, the European Union
Firstly, they themselves want to live, therefore they will have enough knowledge and resources to overcome these crises (as has already happened more than once)
Secondly - as in the old proverb - while the fat dries up - the thin one dies - what is this about?
Oh brakes that in the event of a crisis, the Russian economy will suffer much more than the above-mentioned countries of fat people.
Regular predictions about the death of the United States - then appear when the former, certified by * super experts * - for some reason do not come true.
(and maybe the sea of ​​experts), then almost every day.
the United States will not die, the European Union will not die.
Maybe someday, but not in the near future.
And if this happens, there are no prerequisites for Russia to take the first place (or the leading one) on this ashes.
Hypothetically, if this happens, China will crawl through, India will be purely in numbers.
Having such neighbors as new hegemons - I don’t think you will like their claims.
They definitely won’t consider you equal to themselves, and even less so rely on the old diplomacy.
What is preferable to you - to have Europe and the USA in hypothetical enemies, or a new hegemon * friend * China.
Do you think China will invite Russia to share the world pie with it - it's ridiculous.
I’m sorry to tell him my companion, who is equal in economics and population to 10% of him, but with ambitions not just equal, but the type of leader.
In the old diplomacy, Russia is perceived as the leading one and, in general, it is given its rightful place.
In the new diplomacy, this will not happen.
You are not pulling either in economic development or in human resources.
A victory in the Second World War they will definitely be on the drum.
God forbid we live in an era of change, and even more so for you.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: atalef

What is preferable to you - to have Europe and the USA in hypothetical enemies, or a new hegemon * friend * China.

Alexander! If you still haven’t noticed, I will tell you, but in great secret:
WE PREFERREDLY AND US, AND EU, AND CHINA TO HAVE IN FRIENDS, but not enemies.
But your pro-American ears are visible a mile from under the bale! Are you still trying to set us on China? Well, not yet. An agreement on military cooperation between the Russian Federation and the PRC is already being prepared. Guess three times ... who gets the "faberge sickle" from this?
So your strategic cooperation with the hegemon, by definition, does not suit us. The 90 and the beginning of the 00 are already very memorable. As Russia was robbed then, so perhaps the colonies of the new world were not gutted!
So, - "walk Vasya! As Shakespeare said in sonnet 18" (c)

[Boa kaa]

Quote: atalef

An alarming suitcase has been standing at the door for many years.

No, namesake! We won’t take you back from your historical homeland ... He escaped - he escaped! Stay there, among your fellow tribesmen.
And we without you, the defectors, alone Solovyov and Satanovsky and K * will manage! We have Zhirinovsky one of which is worth it! (Although everywhere he screams that he is Russian!)

[Solo2503]

Specify in what year 17 the great-grandfather of Ulyanov-Lenin said this?

[Antipatr]

Lord of the Sith - Watch, do you think days? Well, of course, there will be a crisis. As was dozens of times before and will be in the future. And then it will end and they will again leave it first and make the rest of the developed world for economic growth. It has always been so, it will continue to be so.

[rocket757]

Again "invisible"?
Let’s take a look and see what else to say ..... and again I predict that work will be accelerated to create new means of airspace control! No claim to excellence can go unanswered for how long!

[Marconi41]

Well, well, the Americans, as in the case of the F-22, again set the tone in aviation. Our answer is PAK YES. Let's see what this answer will be. But in this case, ours is much less behind than last time. In any case, I really hope so.

[Thrifty]

For the price, I wonder how it will change. I think that the hundredth, and the first will cost the same, or the hundredth will be much more expensive than the first but not cheaper.

[demiurg]

Will they learn to wear cruise missiles or will it fly with bombs?

[Antipatr]

Quote: demiurg

Will they learn to wear cruise missiles or will it fly with bombs?

Bombs, dear, are not just in the arsenal, and they are not going to write them off. This is the only tool that allows you to quickly monitor the result of the attack and, if necessary, to produce it again.

[Alien From]

Mattresses expect their bird to fly, we are sure that oh, how long)

[Flatter]

Let it fly. In 2021 we will have a base on the moon

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

Let it fly. In 2021 we will have a base on the moon

Hope it was sarcasm?

[Flatter]

Well, in vain you do not believe. And we believe.

[1976AG]

Quote: Flatter

Well, in vain you do not believe. And we believe.

Someone who believes in God, someone in the Loch Ness monster, and someone in the base on the moon in the 21st year ...

[pytar]

Externally, the aircraft is very similar to those in service with the B-2, which, according to senior military analyst at the University of Lexington and Pentagon adviser Loren Thomson, is due to the fact that the new project actually eliminates the shortcomings of the B-2, while preserving all its advantages. However, all the same, these two aircraft are noticeably different from each other.

In the design of the new bomber, Northrop Grumman relies on stealth. According to Thomson, in some angles the B-2 was clearly visible for enemy radar stations; In the case of the B-21, invisibility will be foreshortening.
On the new bomber, the engines will be located closer to the rudimentary fuselage, while the engines of the General Electric F118-GE-100 of the B-2 aircraft are located at a certain distance from the central section of the airframe. The new project involves the use of oblique air intakes instead of "notched" ones. In addition, B-21 will receive engine jet gas coolants designed to reduce infrared visibility. It is curious that such devices were present in the early images of the future B-2, but were not included in the final version of the project. The engines will likely be a modification of the F-135 installed on F-35 Joint Strike Fighter fighters. This will allow both to obtain the required characteristics, and to reduce the cost of engine production for two aircraft.
Unlike previous cars of its class, the new B-21 should be able to quickly adapt to new missions of one kind or another. The specifics and features of the required architecture should guarantee the ability to easily and quickly upgrade equipment, as well as facilitate the integration of new tools.
For example, in the cargo compartment, in addition to weapons, it will be possible to place observation devices, target designations, etc. In addition, the B-21 will be able to become the carrier of special communications equipment, unmanned aerial systems, electronic intelligence systems or electronic warfare.

[JD1979]

I’m wondering if this aircraft will be created in a complex way, like a carrier-weapon system, or will they again receive a third aircraft in a row (the first ones are B-2 and B-1B) which had bomb-bores that did not allow to hang the main cruise missile - Tomogavk? If they slap it again it will be Epic.

[pytar]

As I understand it, complexity (enhanced functionality + communication) is the main priority, and it should be implemented at a higher level than previous models of bombers. All aviation (including UAVs), as conceived by strategists, should act as a single unit, together with the SS and Navy. The fact that the project initially provided for a leading, if not absolute application of artificial intelligence systems, hints that unmanned versions will probably be the main ones in future versions of B-21.
Information about the arsenal of weapons is scarce, but it is certain that all the shortcomings of the previous bombers will be taken into account. In my opinion, B-21 is the evolution of B2, which will include the most advanced technological developments.

[JD1979]

Complexity as a carrier-weapon is like in the USSR / Russia, an Airplane (carrier) is created and weapons are designed for it and adjustments are made before the production starts, so that everything fits. And in the USA, airplanes are one company, missiles are another, and there are zero interactions between each other, the coordinator in the person of the Ministry of Defense, for some reason, does not work or does not work as it should, as a result, one does not fit into another. Although we are better.

[voyaka uh]

"the main cruise missile - Tomahawk?" ////
-----
Tomahawk - no. But a new CD is being developed, which will be adjusted to the internal compartment of the R-21

[Bogatyrev]

They had JASSM sort of for that. Tomahawk - only from the sea

[JD1979]

The B-52 senior citizen wears axes with JBF; Now, years later, in addition to the ancient free-falling bombs, the AGM-1s LRASSM has finally been added, and other modifications, before that they could not come to any normal air defense system, because a pile of scrap metal is guaranteed.

[Sancho_SP]

So the mass is two masses of f-35.

Armament, presumably, is only inside the corps. And that means - of limited length.

Conclusion: the bet is placed only on promising funds of the REB. Not take off.

[Mastrer]

Well, the experience of collecting spirits at the price of half an aircraft carrier from mattresses does exist. Let's see what lessons they learned from b2. And whether ...

[Wolf]

20 . March 1999 Yerbi killed the US strategist "Misuri". It fell from the Croatian from the "ancient system" Neva. The rocket hit only 20-30 years. If the C300 was beaten, think that the Martian aircraft beat NATO? :)

[Wolf]

In addition to 1 F117, Kotoris zbit Serbs, yet 2-5 F117 beat zbiti! ;)

[Wolf]

Yesterday God is the Warrior of the Voivode Zhivoin Misha. Today he is also being studied at West Point in the USA, but they cannot reach his sense of movement in the army! If the army in you is small and poorly armed, everything can be replaced by MOVEMENT, the bistream will smoothly move !!! His order for the army officers to break through the 1918 Solun Front. You can calmly say that bi Voivoda Zhivoin Misha

and today God beat all NATO commanders!

[Wolf]

What, that someone is minus ??? Let's bet who was one of the generals close to God Mishich in 1 MV? Today, this bi was approximately like the army of the DPR and LPR Will defeat the army of England, France and Ukraine, and then they will dealt a crushing blow to the US army !!!

[Mimoprohodil]

What is it? The plane is "shot down" and is flying now

[evgen1221]

A stealth bomber and a V-2 refueling tanker, a stealth rocket carrier, a V-21, plus F22 and a 35-in my opinion a normal chain is being built, plus unmanned aerial vehicles. Provided I finished the software.

[voyaka uh]

The chain lacks a stealth fighter with a sufficient range to accompany the R-21. And no longer have time to develop it before the release of the Raider.

[evgen1221]

Does the B-52 have such escorts? According to mine, they have enough of those that exist and bases around the world to hand over the strategist along the way.

[voyaka uh]

The B-52 also does not. But with the B-52, the concept is completely different: first, air defense is suppressed,
complete domination in the air is won, and then they fly in and
40 tons of bombs are dumped.
And the Raider, as conceived, passes the air defense unnoticed. Including early air defense
warnings (meter range radars). And escort fighters
he needs only as a safety net -
if bombers run into interceptors by accident.
I talk about theoretical concepts.
You can put forward a lot of arguments against them.

[rocket757]

Quote: voyaka uh

I talk about theoretical concepts.
You can put forward a lot of arguments against them.

A good clarification, otherwise I thought sho write bedtime stories.
There are no arguments against it, because no one has risked and will not dare to check the full-fledged air defense of a really strong country with their helluva lot of "invisible" airplanes.

[Maxwrx]

It seems the Americans wrote that the main requirement is the price is not higher than 300 million, for comparison, 160m2 costs 16 billion rubles (260 million)

[Victoria-V]

Not 300, but 550. But there are no problems with money.

[Maxwrx]

It is 300 or even cheaper for 175 bombers who want to spend 50 billion including development. Read English-language sites, not Russian ones. Even on Wikipedia English it

[Vkd dvk]

Quote: 777-3-59-97

And they will bring it to the series for another 15 years. Despite the fact that the series may turn out to be very small, given the cost of this device.

Wow! As if the story of the Su-57 read.

With a hangover do not go online. Devils will not be tempted.

[Rus_Balt]

It seems that the technology of the flying wing is becoming the hallmark of aviation of the future. They were able to debug control technologies, aircraft made using this technology became reliable. Not many countries can build such technological aircraft. And the gap in high technology will only widen.

[Usher]

The same, only in the left hand. Analog B-2, called differently. Wangyu, will be sawed for 15 years

[Antipatr]

Quote: Flatter

Well, in vain you do not believe. And we believe.

Rogozin was cleaning up!

[Antipatr]

Quote: voyaka uh

The chain lacks a stealth fighter with a sufficient range to accompany the R-21. And no longer have time to develop it before the release of the Raider.

FX, F-XX?