"New" issued material about the "radioactive dirt" on the non-nuclear "Admiral Kuznetsov"

18
The publication of the newspaper Novaya Gazeta is being actively discussed on the Internet, which eloquently testifies to the level of competence (incompetence) of the staff of the publication. The article devoted to the Russian heavy aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov”, in which the “New” referred to a former member of the repair crew of the aircraft carrier Ivan, tells something incredible. This Ivan announced that he was climbing in a white reactor suit in a “reactor compartment”, where there was a risk of getting dirty in “radioactive dirt”.

"New" issued material about the "radioactive dirt" on the non-nuclear "Admiral Kuznetsov"




There's every spot fonit

- from the publication in the newspaper.

Readers have responded to this amazing technical illiteracy and inexhaustible liberal desire to throw mud at the Russian army and navy. The “New” epic failure was noted, since there is no “reactor compartment” and “radioactive mud” at “Admiral Kuznetsov” for the reason that the aircraft carrier is not atomic. The “New” moderators began to delete comments from those readers who pointed out an illiterate and frankly false publication.

From the editorial demanded to explain. “New” was explained in an original way, stating that the material allegedly did not tell about “Admiral Kuznetsov”, but about “Peter the Great”. And “the hero of the publication Ivan”, it turns out, performed work on the repair of the atomic missile cruiser, not the aircraft carrier. But such an attempt to otbrykatsya to success for the "New" did not lead. The fact is that in the mentioned edition of 2017 on Peter the Great there were no repairs in the reactor compartment, and the ship of the Russian Navy will only be repaired and upgraded next year.

Details in the video from Ruslan Ostashko:

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    18 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      25 July 2019 11: 15
      What difference does it make? The main thing is to blurt out loudly! This is the specificity of the current media!
      1. +3
        25 July 2019 11: 18
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        This is the specificity of the current media!

        More precisely - this is the specifics of the present time .. because it’s now hype - to declare oneself loudly .. and it doesn’t matter in what light .. the main thing is to become famous ...
      2. 0
        25 July 2019 14: 19
        What difference does it make? The main thing is to blurt out loudly!

        It is customary to answer for the words.
        It is necessary to sue for slander, that is, to beat according to their most idolized place - for money.
        The more ordinary people sue for slander and win these cases, the less lies and dirt will be in our media.
        The matter remains small - the will of the state and that the courts take the side of those filing claims, and compensate for the resources expended on the court many times ...
        1. 0
          25 July 2019 22: 36
          The more ordinary people sue for slander and win these cases, the less lies and dirt will be in our media.

          Laugh?
          In our country, then everyone will jail each other.) After all, "slander" is so rubber ... that they will run to court if they call it a "fool".)

          The matter is left to the small - the will of the state

          So what what, but the will to file claims for "libel", they have.)
      3. -3
        27 July 2019 02: 12
        What difference does it make


        Vladimir hi , but what difference does it make whether he is there or not? What's the point ?! Look at the Chinese fleet, I am already silent about the States. In our country, this is not a FLEET, compared to China, for example, "Kuzya" is not an AIRLINER, it is nothing! Maybe it's enough to puff out your cheeks and it's worth talking about why we are sitting where we are, and how to get out of it !?
        1. +1
          29 July 2019 03: 18
          Quote: Sea Cat
          where are we sitting

          Konstantin hi Here we sit! How unfortunate ...
          1. 0
            29 July 2019 11: 36
            Good afternoon, Vladimir hi . I am touched by this minuscule audience, you would think that from the fact that they are throwing minuses to someone, the situation will at least somehow change for the better. Like, let's close our eyes together and imagine that everything is in order here? Well, what to talk about with such an audience?
            1. +1
              29 July 2019 14: 14
              Konstantin hi The audience at VO has become very inadequate ... I already am silent about the minuses, they can sculpt everyone, I wrote that they put the minuscule minuses, so they answered me with minuses. I defend my point of view, although many do not like it. Okay, we’ll be alive - we won’t die!
              Happy Navy Day! drinks
              1. +1
                29 July 2019 20: 25
                Agree hi , good luck ! drinks
    2. +8
      25 July 2019 11: 18
      Interesting here. Will they pass a law to determine chief editors and scribblers on logging for such scriptures?
      After all, there must be a punishment for this. The fines do not send them, they will still print "milen" money from over the hill. It is necessary that it is the scribblers themselves and their leadership who have allowed this to suffer.
    3. +9
      25 July 2019 11: 20
      and what kind of distribution of fake news do we have no corresponding article? It seems like it appeared ... Write a collective application and one trash will be less.
    4. +6
      25 July 2019 11: 25
      Oh, how "Novinisty" does not live well and tells! Everything was in truth, nothing was invented ...
      I understand in any fiction there can be logical holes, but what kind of "genius" should the writer and editor himself be, who allowed this opus to be published
    5. +5
      25 July 2019 11: 36
      What does the sponsor spend denyushku? Doesn't it hurt him? Or is he as advanced as a journalist from many media outlets ....
      they would write better about aliens, that’s where there is room for imagination to go wild !!! and no one will refute!
    6. +5
      25 July 2019 11: 43
      What sponsors, such and news.
    7. +3
      25 July 2019 11: 45
      Such journalists should be given shovels and sent for cleaning for garbage pits under the supervision of machine gunners, for fifteen days.
    8. +4
      25 July 2019 11: 53
      where there was a risk of getting dirty in "radioactive dirt".

      has carried? not dirty? wassat
    9. +2
      25 July 2019 14: 13
      What's "new" that white helmets, I don't see the difference. But the prosecutor's office would not hurt to rip off two or three or five millionaires in favor of children of a technical creative orientation for slandering the representatives of the second oldest. I think so.
    10. 0
      25 July 2019 15: 37
      Well, what is this for us?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"