Vilnius called BelAES under construction “main threat” for Europe

88
The Belarusian Nuclear Power Plant (BelNPP), which Moscow and Minsk are building together, is the main threat to Europe. This was stated by the deputy of the Seimas of Lithuania from the party "Union of the Fatherland - Lithuanian Christian Democrats" Zhigmantas Pavilenis, reports "Sputnik Lithuania" with reference to the press service of the Lithuanian parliament.

Vilnius called BelAES under construction “main threat” for Europe




According to the Lithuanian parliamentarian, the launch of the Belarusian nuclear power plant will strike a blow to the energy security of Europe. In order to prevent this, Lithuania should with all its strength confront this “threatening project” and take up the strengthening of the energy security of the Baltic states. In addition, Vilnius should force the European Union to stop ignoring the danger that comes from the station.

If Belarus implements its plans to launch the power plant this fall, it will be a huge blow to the whole of Europe, and we must make great efforts to counter this menacing project.

- he said.

Earlier, Lithuania complained to the IAEA about the danger posed by nuclear power plants, but international experts said that the station is being built in accordance with international safety standards.

It should be noted that Vilnius has repeatedly complained to various international agencies, wishing to stop the construction of the Belarusian NPP. Most of all, Lithuania is not satisfied with the choice of a site for its construction. The fact is that the station was built 50 kilometers from Vilnius.

BelNPP - nuclear power plant of type AES-2006. Two power units can total up to 2400 megawatts. The first unit of the nuclear power plant is scheduled for commissioning in the 2019 year, the second - in the 2020 year.
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    23 July 2019 11: 01
    after they destroyed everything of their own (well, everything that came from the USSR, including the Ignalina NPP), it remains only to envy, whine and complain ... their proficiency in non-volatility
    1. +7
      23 July 2019 11: 05
      In order to destroy that would buy from Europe ... otherwise there is no way)))
      1. +10
        23 July 2019 11: 22
        Yes, any significant and progressive event in Russia or Belarus haunts the venomous evil gnomes from Lithuania. They are well paid for fanning Russophobia.
        1. +2
          23 July 2019 13: 51
          They do not need to pay for Russophobia ... they have it in the blood)))
      2. +3
        23 July 2019 11: 29
        So I want to tell them - wash.
        1. 0
          23 July 2019 13: 16
          They bought electricity in Belarus and will buy it.
          1. +1
            23 July 2019 18: 18
            Everything is extremely simple. Lithuania is jealous of the construction site because they themselves planned to build the Visagina NPP according to the Japanese project, but there were no investors, so they didn’t stink the whole EU because of the BPP, and this statement is a typical propaganda that has nothing with reality. Belarus understands this and ignores this stink from Lithuania.
      3. 0
        23 July 2019 15: 04
        Quote: Canecat
        In order to destroy that would buy from Europe ... otherwise there is no way)))

        From Europe, their mongrel was ordered to complain and whine.
    2. +1
      23 July 2019 12: 11
      It is interesting when the absolute insolvency of the Baltic states, and a number of other supposedly boring countries will bother the world.
      1. +7
        23 July 2019 12: 25
        Quote: Siberia 75
        It is interesting when the absolute insolvency of the Baltic states, and a number of other supposedly boring countries will bother the world.

        It seems that next year the EU ceases to give subsidies to the Baltic states.
    3. 0
      23 July 2019 12: 58
      Quote: silberwolf88
      after they destroyed everything of their own (well, everything that came from the USSR, including the Ignalina NPP)

      Ignalina NPP had RBMK reactors similar to the Chernobyl NPP. So it's time to change all RBMK reactors. Radiation swelling of graphite occurred on all RBMKs, and on some there was a threat that the channels would lead. In general, in Soviet times, RBMKs allocated 25 years of the assigned resource.
      1. +3
        23 July 2019 14: 14
        Extended the life of up to 45 years. According to the graphite masonry, if necessary, an SEC is carried out - part of the channels is sawn. In any case, the first unit of the Leningrad NPP worked for its 45 years and was stopped at the end of December last year solely because of the end of its operating license.
        1. +1
          23 July 2019 18: 43
          The main reason for sawing channels, extending the life of the service before replacing VVER. For the Gigivat of electricity is just nowhere to take. When the power unit No. 1 VVER-1200 was launched at Leningrad NPP-2, the power unit No. 1 of the RBMK-1000 series at the Leningrad NPP was stopped.
          1. 0
            23 July 2019 20: 08
            I agree. But extending the service life of graphite masonry to 45 years was justified, as was the TPX method.
    4. 0
      23 July 2019 19: 00
      Yes, indeed, everything got "wasted", and now you woke up?
  2. +4
    23 July 2019 11: 03
    As if one reactor will be built right in the center of Vilnius! Now, what do they care? If only to spoil the air with their cries? ??
    1. +4
      23 July 2019 11: 24
      No, they are members of NATO. They were told that soon, just about the civilized world would once again begin to destroy Russia.
      What will happen to nuclear power plants in Russia, of course, they don’t care, but here right next to it.
      Fear.
      We thought it would be possible to comfortably rob and kill the Russians, but it may turn out that we ourselves will have to save ourselves.
  3. +3
    23 July 2019 11: 06
    If Estonians built it, they would strain even more
    1. 0
      23 July 2019 15: 06
      Quote: Ken71
      If Estonians built it, they would strain even more

      On the contrary. Could not strain lol
  4. -29
    23 July 2019 11: 07
    The problem now, due to climate change, is drought. If a nuclear power plant is near a river, then there is a very high risk of its sudden shutdown due to lack of water for cooling and for the operation of turbines. This applies to all "river" nuclear power plants in the world.
    1. Hog
      +3
      23 July 2019 11: 13
      Well, they drown the reactor, so what? Where is the danger?
      1. -16
        23 July 2019 11: 18
        It is much more difficult to shut down and restart nuclear power reactors than to restart a conventional thermal power plant.
        During the restart of the nuclear power plant, and most emergency situations occur.
        1. Hog
          +3
          23 July 2019 11: 23
          Emergency situation - a condition of a potentially hazardous facility, characterized by violation of the limits and (or) conditions of safe operation, which did not go into an accident, in which all the adverse effects of hazards on personnel, the public and the environment are kept within acceptable limits by the appropriate technical means provided by the project.
        2. +4
          23 July 2019 11: 25
          Muffling is just that simple. Relatively of course, but fast enough. For example in emergency situations.
        3. +1
          23 July 2019 12: 05
          Warrior - if this is a joke, then where to laugh? For a serious statement by an adult, I'm sorry, it does not pull! At a minimum, you have forgotten about such a problem as the level of training of attendants, for starters. ...
        4. +1
          23 July 2019 12: 59
          Well, why so scare. Each year, each unit in a planned manner twice stops for routine maintenance and starts. All this without emergency situations, if strictly according to the manual. So the drought has nothing to do with it, there will be enough time to foresee it and take action.
        5. -1
          23 July 2019 14: 07
          Khokhlam tell this, which with the rods of Westinghouse in no way (to the trouble) will not play enough.
    2. +14
      23 July 2019 11: 14
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The problem now is due to climate change - drought.

      oh yes ... politics has nothing to do with it, it’s about ecology and climate ... I laugh ... if the states did that, the sprats would jump with delight ...
    3. +6
      23 July 2019 11: 26
      You couldn’t hear more ridiculous nonsense. Read about technology at nuclear power plants.
      1. -17
        23 July 2019 11: 31
        Read about nuclear power plant shutdowns due to dry rivers or reservoirs in France and California. In all cases, very unpleasant situations arose.
        But, I see, I touched on the "holy topic" of the Russians - nuclear energy.
        NPP is "our everything". smile
        Okay, I'm leaving ... drinks
        1. +1
          23 July 2019 13: 20
          Read about nuclear power plant shutdowns due to dry rivers or reservoirs in France and California. In all cases, very unpleasant situations arose.

          Reactors, in our country and in the West, work on a different principle. Therefore, it is incorrect to directly compare.
          The availability of fresh water in Belarus is one of the highest in the world. On occasion, you can always pump water from groundwater.
          Therefore, we should not worry about a possible lack of water.
    4. +6
      23 July 2019 11: 29
      Quote: voyaka uh
      This applies to all "river" nuclear power plants in the world.

      What is a river nuclear power plant?
      1. +6
        23 July 2019 11: 39
        This question should be asked to the Ukrainian residents. Normal people cannot answer this.
    5. +2
      23 July 2019 11: 32
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The problem now, due to climate change, is drought. If a nuclear power plant is near a river, then there is a very high risk of its sudden shutdown due to lack of water for cooling and for the operation of turbines. This applies to all "river" nuclear power plants in the world.


      For this, there is always a supply of water at the station, and given that the Viliya river has a width of up to 100 meters in this place, it is not particularly believed that it can dry out
      1. -9
        23 July 2019 11: 37
        In California, huge deep concrete reservoirs were drying up. And had to stop the reactors.
        Is the Volga a big river? - do not happen anymore. But she, too, has been "on the brink" in recent years.
        Only a nuclear power plant powered by water from the sea can guarantee stable operation. But there are troubles: salt, tsunami ...
        1. +5
          23 July 2019 11: 44
          Quote: voyaka uh
          In California, huge deep concrete reservoirs were drying up.

          The fact is that Belarus is not California, natural zones differ by an order of magnitude
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Is the Volga a big river? - do not happen anymore. But she, too, has been "on the brink" in recent years.

          This is the result of human activity primarily, not climate change. We have set up power plants and now can’t adjust the discharge
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Only a nuclear power plant powered by water from the sea can guarantee stable operation. But there are troubles: salt, tsunami ...

          I think the problem is primarily in technology. Chernobyl made me think differently, changed the approach to security systems.
    6. +1
      23 July 2019 11: 46
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The problem now, due to climate change, is drought. If a nuclear power plant is near a river, then there is a very high risk of its sudden shutdown due to lack of water for cooling and for the operation of turbines. This applies to all "river" nuclear power plants in the world.

      ===
      regions of drought do not threaten this, unless climatic conditions change dramatically
      1. -4
        23 July 2019 11: 54
        "unless the climatic conditions change dramatically" ///
        ----
        So what am I talking about?
        I’m not saying that the climate is changing because of man. But it is changing, and only the blind can not notice it. Sharp waves of heat in northern Europe lead to droughts. And droughts stop both hydropower plants and thermal power plants and nuclear power plants. Turbines need water to operate. At the same time, restarting a nuclear power plant is much more problematic than restarting a hydroelectric power station or thermal power plant.
        1. +1
          23 July 2019 11: 56
          Quote: voyaka uh
          So what am I talking about?

          ===
          I live in this region, I do not see the prerequisites, there is plenty of rainfall. arising heat periods are short
          1. +1
            23 July 2019 12: 00
            Well, thank God! So that everything remains .... drinks
          2. +4
            23 July 2019 12: 16
            Why are you arguing with him?
            He is from the series "always and everywhere to water the Russians and Russia." For ANY occasion. In any way.
            Drought, this is the first thing that came to his mind. An earthquake could come.
            And the most widespread one is "Russian savages took the nuclear power plant from somewhere (probably they stole it), and now it is urgent to take it away from them".
            This is what peers through a rotten grin through polite cultural discussions about ecology.
            This is real Russophobia in Hebrew. Do not say anything directly, so that if you take someone for a certain place, you could universally shout that they did not say that. no one was offended, and we ourselves are to blame.
            1. +4
              23 July 2019 12: 50
              Quote: Thunderbringer
              He is from the series "always and everywhere to water the Russians and Russia." For ANY occasion. In any way.

              ===
              you are wrong, read the history of his comments. and indeed, everything is wrong to the heap
        2. +5
          23 July 2019 12: 07
          Quote: voyaka uh
          "unless the climatic conditions change dramatically" ///
          ----
          So what am I talking about?
          I’m not saying that the climate is changing because of man. But it is changing, and only the blind can not notice it. Sharp waves of heat in northern Europe lead to droughts. And droughts stop both hydropower plants and thermal power plants and nuclear power plants. Turbines need water to operate. At the same time, restarting a nuclear power plant is much more problematic than restarting a hydroelectric power station or thermal power plant.

          Well, comparing hydropower plants and thermal power plants with nuclear power plants is somewhat wrong.
          Hydroelectric power plants are built on rivers and water is a consumable material, and quite final in case of drought, the water consumption for hydroelectric power stations is enormous.
          In the case of thermal power plants and nuclear power plants, water is only the heat carrier of the second circuit (or third) and the water flow in the reservoir (as a rule, a reservoir is only evaporation.
          That is, consumption is not particularly critical.
          In general, the restart of nuclear power plants and thermal power plants is exactly the same and is regulated by the time of accumulation of steam.
          It’s almost 17 hours at the known Heder power station, after the boiler is completely damped.
          At nuclear power plants, approximately the same parameters
    7. +1
      23 July 2019 12: 04
      The water supply in the ponds of the nuclear power plant is sufficient for the seasonal operation of cooling towers.
    8. +4
      23 July 2019 12: 21
      In order for the power station to suddenly stop, it is necessary for the water in the river to end just as suddenly. How do you imagine that?
      And this, water is not used for the operation of turbines. Water cools the condensers to produce water from the exhaust steam. And the water is taken not from the river, but from the cooling pond, a small reservoir of this kind.
      And yet, you see two cooling towers in the photo? Why do you think they are?
    9. +3
      23 July 2019 12: 32
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The problem now, due to climate change, is drought. If a nuclear power plant is near a river, then there is a very high risk of its sudden shutdown due to lack of water for cooling and for the operation of turbines. This applies to all "river" nuclear power plants in the world.

      hi A contrived problem. Reservoirs for cooling reactors are a complex hydraulic structure, which is designed in conjunction with the station. For example, the area of ​​the ChNPP reservoir is 21 sq. km, average depth 6m, max. 20 m. There is a "working pond", where water is discharged from the stations, because of the high temperature, the liquid evaporates actively all year round, so the reservoirs quickly become shallow. Therefore, it becomes necessary to systematically pump waste water into another reservoir for purification. pontoon pumping stations are used.
      Pumping water can last more than three months, and the volume of fluid pumped during this time reaches thirty million cubic meters.

      This technology of replacing the liquid is called purging the reservoir, which helps to clean the water from salts (their saturation can reach 1300 milliliters per liter), which can clog the reactor cooling system.

      The water pumped into the second pond is purified in various ways and returned to the production cycle or natural reservoirs, since it is completely environmentally friendly.
      Of course, there is recharge from natural reservoirs to the "main" reservoir. When designing reservoirs, they take data for the last 50 years, as a "backup feed" they design reserve pipelines and take into account artesian wells.
    10. +2
      23 July 2019 12: 41
      Do not write nonsense. Water cooling of 4 circuits at a nuclear power plant takes place in cooling towers, by partial evaporation. To replenish the evaporated water and partially replace it, small ponds are enough. Such large, wide pipes near each power plant, and not only nuclear, that’s where the main heat removal takes place.
      PS Among the commentators, I see, there are more and more "writers" who do not have even basic knowledge of physics in high school.
    11. 0
      23 July 2019 13: 41
      Take an example from Lithuania! We destroyed the constructed enterprises of the USSR, did not build our own and are not going to, glory to the nation, death to fools!
    12. 0
      23 July 2019 18: 58
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The problem now is due to climate change - drought. If a nuclear power plant is near a river, then the risk of its sudden shutdown due to


      Let it be for you. Everything is much simpler. When the Lithuanians closed Ingalina, the Europeans promised them to solve all the problems with the energy shortage. Alternatively, build a new nuclear power plant according to the most European standards, giving the most democratic megawatts, overflowing with quanta of freedom. :) But then, "all of a sudden" Belarusians ordered a nuclear power plant in Russia, and the Lithuanians began to "burn out", because in Brussels they changed their rhetoric and softly asked for a business justification of the Lithuanian nuclear power plant project. A couple of years later, the Poles started talking about their own nuclear power plant. And it became very clear to the Lithuanians that instead of selling electricity, they now have a lifetime purchase of it. So they squeal, hoping that in Brussels they will somehow "cancel" the Belarusian nuclear power plant and give them the promised Lithuanian one. The squeals of the Lithuanians have nothing to do with the real danger and ecology. These are the screams of a deceived woman with low social responsibility.
  5. +7
    23 July 2019 11: 15
    I live in Kaliningrad, I noticed no one is assimilating as much as the Lithuanians, it takes some years and some Stankevicius or Komisaraitis completely stop speaking with an accent, and their descendants generally become just Russian. You can still catch an Estonian or even a Latvian by accent and features of the mentality, and the Lithuanians become Russian literally in the next generation.
    1. +3
      23 July 2019 11: 20
      genetics, old man, Great Lithuania - this is not Zhmud, but Russians
    2. 0
      23 July 2019 11: 42
      Quote: gabonskijfront
      I live in Kaliningrad

      ===
      not so long ago, residents from the Lithuanian suburbs were actively engaged in shuttle trade (cigarettes, alcohol, fuel, etc.), now, probably, prices have leveled off and activity has subsided?
      1. 0
        23 July 2019 11: 49
        They are in Poland for groceries, just like us. Only we have almost no sense, insurance, gasoline, a visa comes out the same way. And Lithuanians and Poles also sell a little cigarettes and gasoline, but only in border towns, so that manually pushing the car was not far .
        1. 0
          23 July 2019 11: 53
          Quote: gabonskijfront
          They are in Poland for groceries, just like us. Only we have almost no sense, insurance, gasoline, a visa comes out the same way. And Lithuanians and Poles also sell a little cigarettes and gasoline, but only in border towns, so that manually pushing the car was not far .

          ===
          that’s how I meant Lithuanians, because they, the peddlers, in the bus at the border crossing, there were at least a third of the passengers.
  6. 0
    23 July 2019 11: 15
    Eh ... Old Man is not for you !!! laughing
  7. +1
    23 July 2019 11: 20
    I write without reading the article, and so it is clear what the Selyaks croak about. Oh God, stop the planet — I'll get off. Well, at least kill, I don’t understand their logic and benefits. When criticizing your population for expensive electricity, yelling that buying cheap energy from a neighbor on the right is terrible at the same time buying from a neighbor on the left for tridorogo and working out in kind is the most it. Hand face and knockout under a table from such statements.
  8. 0
    23 July 2019 11: 21
    Lithuania complains to the IAEA of alleged danger from a nuclear power plant

    Nobody wants to become like Chernobyl, it’s understandable .... but what’s the rest? what is the energy hazard?
    In short, they stir up very stupidly, and therefore they will be here and there in the span.
  9. +1
    23 July 2019 11: 25
    Any movement of the Russian Federation or Belarus will be blocked and interpreted. Thus, the EU will show who is in charge, who has real power. The goal is to establish an alternative regime and low energy prices. To do this, the humanization of the enemy is carried out. These are modern military operations.
  10. -3
    23 July 2019 11: 25
    so there is only a nuclear power plant left! Putin said green energy windmills are harmful for birds only oil and atom only hardcore
  11. 0
    23 July 2019 11: 27
    Most of all, Lithuania is not satisfied with the choice of site for its construction. The fact is that the station was built 50 kilometers from Vilnius.

    Remove the problem - return the gift to Comrade. Stalin.
  12. +4
    23 July 2019 11: 28
    Yes, the whole screech on this issue of the Balts in general, and the Lithuanians in particular, it seems to me, is connected with the exit from the energy bridge connecting Kaliningrad with the rest of Russia. Lithuania does not have its own generation, especially after the closure of its nuclear power plant. There was one lever - the energy bridge, through which it was possible to bargain cheaper energy for yourself. Kaliningrad is switching to full self-sufficiency in electricity, Belarusians will introduce their own nuclear power plants - they will also receive self-sufficiency plus the ability to sell surpluses. And the only thing left for the Baltic states is to sit and moan and their trough and pay for the light in their bulbs now at market prices.
    1. +1
      23 July 2019 12: 29
      That NATO Kaliningrad region bypassed there should be built nuclear power plants. Both it is useful, and the Poles will be afraid to touch in their dreams.
  13. 0
    23 July 2019 11: 45
    It even becomes insulting. It seems that Russia alone is the main threat to "free" Europe and the entire "brightest" world community. And now a joint nuclear power plant with Belarus has been attached to us. Can't we threaten alone or have we overstrained ourselves?
  14. +2
    23 July 2019 11: 48
    Well, there VVER-1200 is not VVER-TOI, but almost. Safer than almost any reactor operating in Europe and certainly anyone in 404
  15. +1
    23 July 2019 11: 56
    The owner of the Balto-Shavks was given the command - "Voice!" They themselves do not represent anything.
    As IA Krylov said in his fable "Passers-by and Dogs"
    Envious people, no matter what they look at,
    They will rise forever barking;
    And you yourself go your way:
    Pole, let alone.
  16. +2
    23 July 2019 11: 57
    There is an answer to the claims of Lithuania - to begin construction of the third power unit.
    1. 0
      23 July 2019 13: 49
      He is redundant there
  17. 0
    23 July 2019 12: 07
    In fact, Vilnius (correctly Vilnius) has never been Lithuania, but the part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania related to Belarus.
  18. +1
    23 July 2019 12: 25
    The price of Lithuania’s entry into the EU was the closure of Ignalina NPP.

    Now Lithuanians are writing in boiling water.

    What is permitted to Jupiter is not permitted to the bull.
    1. 0
      23 July 2019 12: 44
      Quote: Horse, people and soul

      What is permitted to Jupiter is not permitted to the bull.

      "Jupiter" itself is closing the nuclear power plant at an accelerated pace. The Allies never dreamed of such speed of destruction of the Axis infrastructure.
      1. 0
        23 July 2019 12: 47
        Jupiter to Jupiter - discord.

        Germany closes the station. France most of all European countries generates electricity at nuclear power plants.

        And Russia is also Jupiter. The senility of the European Commission for Russia is not a decree.
        1. 0
          23 July 2019 16: 32
          Quote: Horse, people and soul

          Germany closes the station.

          I know, actually.
          France most of all European countries generates electricity at nuclear power plants.

          In the world. 60% This exception confirms the rule. French, with rare exceptions, is one of the most sane nations.
    2. 0
      23 July 2019 15: 00
      Not only the nuclear power plant, they also removed their litas in exchange for the euro. The Poles left the zloty here, well done.
  19. +1
    23 July 2019 12: 42
    "The main threat to Europe" is the long tongues and short minds in the Baltics ..
    1. 0
      23 July 2019 12: 47
      Short minds passionately plus. Better not to say.
  20. 0
    23 July 2019 12: 42
    I'm not sure of the exact quote, but something like this: "Obscurantism will return on the wings of progress." © some state politician.
  21. +1
    23 July 2019 12: 53
    The threat to Europe comes from the Baltic countries. And this is not only a threat to Europe. If in the world this attitude to scientific and technological progress, to science and culture, which exists today in these territories, prevails, then this is a threat to the whole world, to all mankind.
    1. 0
      23 July 2019 14: 30
      "Or maybe throw a grenade there?"
  22. 0
    23 July 2019 13: 07
    This is called autonomy! They lived in the USSR and did not grieve, did not experience any problems, but how they live now - every day is a problem!
    1. +1
      23 July 2019 14: 30
      Ignalina NPP was in Lithuania. No! Having bent and having posed a backside under the West (as well as Bulgaria) - they closed the only source of electricity. Now they are buying from Belarus.
      Abidna!
  23. +2
    23 July 2019 13: 15
    We still have to install huge fans in their direction, let them look and are afraid of what they’ll inflate, and before the border sell gas masks, at a cheap price, of old and bulk in warehouses. You can still search for unused land at the border, clear it, enclose it with a fence and tell us that we are building another, five times more powerful! In general, you can mock well.
  24. +2
    23 July 2019 13: 26
    Another bunch in a puddle from the Baltic pug)))
  25. -1
    23 July 2019 14: 10
    If the Lithuanians complain, then Batko is doing the right thing.
  26. +1
    23 July 2019 14: 27
    Yeah!
    Lithuania heavily put on its pants after the closure of its station.
    Now the snake hisses.
    But to whom? To Finland, which is building?
    To Sweden, where else do the stations work?
    No! Lithuania is crushed by a redneck: "We were deceived! Chief, everything is lost!"
  27. +1
    23 July 2019 16: 15
    Bark, mongrels, bark .... And the caravan goes ... It was necessary to think with your head when they climbed into Europe ...
  28. 0
    23 July 2019 17: 45
    Awesome people! Russia is the main threat! Putin is the main threat! Nord Stream 2 is the main threat! The Belarusian nuclear power plant is again the main threat! ... Probably every night they go to sleep in the bunker, having previously stuffed themselves with hundreds of tranquizizers, depressants and sleeping pills! I feel sorry for them - they live in constant fear for their skins, so you can easily end your life on the bed of a madhouse.
  29. 0
    23 July 2019 19: 31
    And then I thought why the Americans are filming a new obscene series about the Chernobyl disaster, it remains to count the money "green" and, perhaps, bang one of the old Soviet nuclear power plants.
  30. 0
    23 July 2019 21: 31
    Nothing new - they constantly complain and shout that the nuclear power plant under construction is dangerous ...