The submarine Novorossiysk Black Sea Fleet completed dock repair

Dock repair of a submarine of project 636.3 Novorossiysk of the Black Sea fleet finished, the submarine was withdrawn from the Sevmorzavod dock, TASS agency reported, citing an informed source.

According to the agency, the dock repair of diesel-electric submarines Novorossiysk, conducted jointly by the specialists of the Sevastopol Sevmorzavod and the St. Petersburg Admiralty Shipyards, was completed, the submarine was removed from the dock and delivered to the berth. The submarine will leave the plant in two weeks, during which additional preventive work will be carried out.

The past day "Novorossiysk" withdrawn from the dock "Sevmorzavod"

- clarified the interlocutor of the agency.

Reportedly, this is the first large dock repair of diesel-electric submarines Novorossiysk after its transfer to the fleet in 2014. It is assumed that after the completion of the repair of "Novorossiysk" at the "Sevmorzavod" can alternately supply other submarines of this project for repair. It is known that "Rostov-on-Don", "Kolpino" and "Veliky Novgorod" dock repair did not pass.

The diesel-electric submarine Novorossiysk is the head in a series of six submarines of the 636.3 Varshavyanka project built for the Black Sea Fleet. 20 of August 2010 of the year was laid on the Admiralty Shipyards CVD in St. Petersburg, launched on November 28 of 2013 of the year, accepted into the Russian Navy 22 of August 2014, and on September 11 2014 became part of the Black Sea Fleet.

Displacement above sea level 2350 tons, underwater 3950 tons. 73,8 meter length, 9,9 meter width, 6,2 meter draft. Surface speed 17 nodes, underwater 20 nodes. Working depth immersion 240 meters, 300 limit meters. The autonomy of swimming 45 day. Crew 52 man. The main armament - KR "Caliber" and 533 mm torpedoes.

Comments

[WILL]

Well, nice! Seven feet under the keel! The crew - good health!

[VSrostagro]

Interestingly, after the repair will go to the base or work off the coast of Syria?

[Nycomed]

A good boat, for the Black Sea Fleet - seven feet!

[VikVrt]

Hello everybody! In Soviet times, docking between campaigns was a routine, they also changed the battery in the factory, and nothing was written about it in the newspapers ...

[Alexander Petrov1]

These boats and even with missiles at a price of $ 300 million, which is 2 times less than their Western counterparts, have already paid off for Russia, the best offer on the world market is price - quality, wonderful boats in their class.

[2 Level Advisor]

if they don’t sell, how did they pay off?

[Alexander Petrov1]

How can they not sell it? That the Admiralty Shipyards gave them to the Russian Navy for free or for money?

[2 Level Advisor]

well .. well, if you think so, yes .. the state bought from a state-owned company and it turns out to work? yes .. but what does it mean then your - "paid off"?
The boats are very good, proven and of high quality, that's a fact - but earnings? so you can get that the state earns on the purchase of "Yars" for the needs of the army ..

[Alexander Petrov1]

If no one dares to attack the state, because the aggressor knows that he cannot win and is guaranteed to be destroyed, that means money is not wasted on the army, and we have them very small compared to the United States and China and India, and we maintain parity with all of them, then our army is more efficient and, accordingly, paid back.

[Bigriver]

Quote: 2 level advisor

well .. well, if you think so, yes .. the state bought from a state-owned company and it turns out to work? yes .. but what does it mean then your - "paid off"?
The boats are very good, proven and of high quality, that's a fact - but earnings? so you can get that the state earns on the purchase of "Yars" for the needs of the army ..

You have some kind of farmer's economy.
Is it unclear what your current of thought is?: / Do you think each weapon should be profitable in the first place? "Petrel", apparently, is very bad for this parameter? Because it won't bring dollars from external contracts? :)
But can it be otherwise?
For example, the state makes money on the international market on something specific, then invests these funds in high-tech (research institutes), provides the defense industry with state orders, and millions of jobs with real wages are counted. For your boat, for your information, hundreds of enterprises of the country work. Is this not socially important? Is it not making money?

[2 Level Advisor]

You’re just my logic that I conveyed to the opponent telling about the fact that not measuring everything with earnings .. so the defendant made a mistake))) but in general there is a difference between the concepts of earnings and total income ..

[Alexey RA]

Quote: 2 level advisor

if they don’t sell, how did they pay off?

They sold their predecessors. Project 636.3 is a "Russified" export project 636 / 636M / 636.1. And the submarines of these projects are serving in Algeria, Vietnam and China.

[Grad-Xnumx]

How often do Varshavyanka dock repairs take place?
It went into operation at the end of 2014 and after 4,5 years for repairs?

[Alexander Petrov1]

So the more trips to combat service, the more wear and tear of the boat and mechanisms, and these boats work practically without rest, but it was rather a small repair and preventive maintenance, and a larger repair and modernization usually takes place in 10 years, which is on diesel, that on nuclear submarines, for example, when the Vladikavkaz diesel submarine was lowered, the Navy said that the service life was extended by 10 years, and so was the Tula nuclear submarine.

[From Siberia we]

Ships dock every three years. overgrown with a shell

[Masha]

and the battle continues again!

[Bigriver]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

... it was rather a small repair and preventative maintenance, and larger repairs and modernization usually goes through 10 years, ..

This is a VERY little repair.
The topic is "sick". The fact is that now in our fleet there is no medium repair at all, as a category. This is what you are talking about. Designers, for the last half century, have laid down a certain cycle in projects, 10-12 years of service before average repair. After it - another extension for 10-12 years. Under Defense Minister Sergeev, instead of medium repairs, the HTG category (restoration of technical readiness) was introduced. This is a complex of measures AT TIMES more simple and simplified than the average repair. There, the extension of service is usually 6-8 years. True, there is eclecticism :) Like the last case: the nuclear submarine "Omsk" (949A), released after the HTG and modernization (weapons complex) :)
"Pravda-2"! :)) We started to modernize and re-equip the first boat of project 949A. This must be a revolution. Since, since the end of the 80s (project 675MKV), such sweeping work has not been done at all.

[Alexander Petrov1]

I don’t understand that the funds are not enough for the full-scale maintenance of boats and the deadlines are being tightened, but somehow the repair and modernization of boats is slowly going, and in principle, if there is enough resource after repair and modernization for as long as 10 years, this seems to be not bad at the level of western competitors ...

[Bigriver]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

I don’t understand that the funds are not enough for the full-scale maintenance of boats and the deadlines are being tightened, but somehow the repair and modernization of boats is slowly going, and in principle, if there is enough resource after repair and modernization for as long as 10 years, this seems to be not bad at the level of western competitors ...

Consider it. The nuclear submarine Irkutsk (949A), which has been under repair since 2002, was delivered to the Navy in December 1989. He will be modernized. It will take 5 years.
TOTAL how much did he serve?
13 years of service, 17 years of downtime in the uncertainty at the shipyard, 5 years of modernization. Cool arithmetic?
Yes, ahead is the prospect of 12 years of service! But, this is somewhere starting in 2024.

[Alexander Petrov1]

I don’t agree with you that, to put it mildly, a mess, but what to do, we are digging out the chronic underfunding of the late 90s and early 2000s ...

[Bigriver]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

I don’t agree with you that, to put it mildly, a mess, but what to do, we are digging out the chronic underfunding of the late 90s and early 2000s ...

Not that a mess ... He was!
Now there is a feeling that the emphasis in ensuring national security is placed on certain things. Well, this is "March-2018". It says it all. Since the beginning of the 2000s, amers had a plan to ensure total superiority over Russia in strategic weapons by the current line in time. Through this - bending over Russia, limiting its sovereignty. If we did not work for a breakthrough, but linearly invested finances in the confrontation, we would not have succeeded in fucking. And so .., like it happened. The strategic threat has been removed for a couple of decades, thanks to technology demonstrators.
Second.
One way or another, "the generals are preparing for the last war." Including here :)) Who said that we need to be ready for a full-scale confrontation with NATO? Maybe a more serious threat is posed by the AMOUNT of small and transient conflicts along the perimeter of Russia?

[Alexander Petrov1]

So it is true, but I would like for ships and boats to be made and repaired quickly and to save money on downtime ...

[Bigriver]

Quote: Alexander Petrov1

So it is true, but I would like for ships and boats to be made and repaired quickly and to save money on downtime ...

This is with us Society abides in a continuous sense of the ease of evolution. First, socialism, then - a breath of some kind of air, then degradation, stagnation, a return to the "roots". And everything is fleeting and we feel only through our "pocket". The psyche is fast, unlike the economy. For 10-15 years we have ruined the continuity in many things: design, development, production experience, etc. These are all very inert things that have been grown for decades. Nothing will happen quickly. The main thing now is progress and constancy. Throws "here and there" are suicidal.
It is already impossible to restore the skill of departed designers, designers, plant managers, workshops, sites, etc. You need to start all over again. Well, or almost from scratch. This is possible when people feel a clear and defined medium-term perspective.

[Alexander Petrov1]

Let's hope for the best...

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Such a boat, and even with an air-independent installation - that would be the case.

In order not to pop up to her every day or how much she has there.

With autonomy for a month. She lay down at the bottom and waits. Where such boats will be any AUG, not to mention smaller groups, thinks 100 times before coming closer to the depth of action of such a boat and its weapon systems.

For protection it’s better than you can imagine.

The mines of her are still remotely mounted and some kind of underwater drones, so that she herself can detect and destroy mines.

Maybe there is something like that on Varshavyanka, who knows?