Military Review

On the reform of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Will Putin turn into "elbasy"?

220

Constitution "usurper"


Every nation lives as its constitution allows it to live. If we accept this point of view, it becomes immediately clear why we live so, to put it mildly, uneasy: having voted in a referendum in 1993 for the “constitution of the usurper”, we fully paid for our own levity, gullibility, stupidity. Although…




It is still not entirely clear whether it is full. The constitution adopted at that time, despite all its obvious imbalances and abuses, still remains our basic law. Moreover, in a quarter of a century or more, it has undergone almost no changes: it is likely that its creators and their ideological heirs consider it a really good tool. Why change something good? That's it…

By the way, in some ways they are certainly right. If we accept the idea that the current Constitution of the Russian Federation was created not for the state to function well, but for the people to live with dignity, but only for the purpose of retaining power by a certain circle of people, then it is better to find something than our “highest regulatory legal act” pretty hard. Our president is both the guarantor of this constitution, the chief official, the commander-in-chief, and the government removes-appoints, and in general is not just the main thing, but the only actor in Russian politics. It has become ridiculous - even the president can be removed from the post of minister or general, and the immediate superiors of negligent (or retiring) subordinates are deprived of this opportunity.

Although, perhaps, they are not deprived, but they prefer not to take on much self-reliance. And if it goes on like this, soon the president, by his decrees, will appoint even householders and district police officers. Well, why not, really? The constitution allows ...

Does the Kremlin understand that this model of governance is flawed and simply dangerous for the future of the country? Probably understand, not so stupid people there. Still, the process of reforming the constitution will not get off the ground, it’s very convenient in its current form to ensure our favorite stability. And if the question of amending the Yeltsin constitution arises, it is only in connection with the future (and many expected) “transfer” of power.



Constitution 2.0?


Here and again, for the umpteenth time, there have been injections in the network about the forthcoming constitutional reform. In particular, the telegram channel "Nezgar", considered one of the most informed sources in terms of all sorts of "insiders", recently threw food for thought. According to the source, several power transfer scenarios are being prepared in Russia at once, each of which involves including making certain changes to the current constitution.

It is reported that State Duma Speaker Vladislav Volodin is one of the lobbyists for constitutional reform, which in itself is quite anecdotal. But we are not in a hurry to smile and laugh all the more: given the experience we have, it is obvious that Putin will propose a weak, initiative-less, passive figure, in principle incapable of taking any independent steps, for the post of his successor. Once it was Dmitry Medvedev, and the experience can be considered successful. Volodin is clearly from the cohort of people who are not capable of coups d'état, so why not? Nominal position, nominal figure in this position ...



It is assumed that a peculiar hybrid of the Soviet and German political systems can be taken as a basis. In particular, they will reject the Soviet rejection of elections on party lists for the sake of elections in the majority districts. A general concept of “a strong parliament - a strong government - a powerless president” will be taken from the German one.

Such an option seems somewhat controversial, since the very certainty that there is some kind of “strong government” in Germany (or the chancellor, whoever is more comfortable) is wrong: the chancellor in Germany is strong, while the coalition that has chosen him is strong. A defeat in an election or just a quarrel between coalition members can easily end with a change of chancellor, and he can’t prevent it. Another thing is that the Germans themselves do not like self-indulgence and every year they are not satisfied with re-elections (this is not the Italians of the eighties), but this is a factor that is hard to count, there is little hope for us in this sense.

It is also not yet clear whether the reform will affect only what is directly related to the issue of transfer of power, or will be broader. Will there be new government bodies like the State Council? And if they do, what will be their place in the model of public administration?

In part, it would be possible to answer this question if we knew the answer to the most crucial question: what, in fact, does Putin himself want from the transfer?

Actually, there are only two options: either he wants to retain full power in the country, simply transfer to another chair, or he just wants to calmly, “holding his hand on the pulse”, having the maximum guarantees of immunity, sit in a solid chair for the rest of his life. That is, to put it in simple terms: will Putin remain Putin or will he turn into a “elbasy”?

But even the second option still implies that the current president has more authority in the future. Because otherwise, no matter how honorable his position may be, no one will give him any guarantees of immunity. And this, as we understand, is very critical ...

All we have, except ...


Of course, any progress in reforming our constitution can be considered useful in advance. Nevertheless, it is of fundamental importance what motives were in the development and adoption of certain constitutional norms. If it is again a question of retaining personal power, as in 1993, the result is very likely to be just as sad.

And so I would like to see in the country a normal, strong parliamentarism, a responsible government, effective, but correct siloviki! And if it’s very scary to immediately give power to our parliamentarians, can you, as an experiment, be given a little more authority at least to regional parliaments? And there, taking into account the results obtained, it would be possible to gradually extend this experience to the whole country.

Of course, to many this promise will seem controversial: well, they will give power to parliament, so what? But just imagine: the government is not sitting for many years, showing a zero result, and after a year or two of such work gets a kick in the ass and goes to unload the cars. Corruption, which has long become one of the main problems of the country, is beginning to shrink, because it is easy to “buy” one official or prosecutor, but try “financially interested” three or four hundred deputies competing for the right and continue to occupy a warm place in the State Duma .

It is clear that all this is not a panacea. Still, it would be gratifying to observe the process of recovery itself, of setting up the work of our huge and potentially incredibly powerful state organism.

It so happened that through the efforts of our ancestors we got a huge country in which there is almost everything that is needed for a good life. We also have a hardworking, educated people, and a scientific and technological reserve that will allow another twenty or thirty years to develop and grow. There is only one thing: good governance. But it is not surprising - well, where could he get from our history and such a constitution?

But if history does not have to be rewritten and you have to live with it forever, then creating a normal constitution is more or less achievable.

Therefore, any message about a possible constitutional reform I meet with timid hope. Maybe these guys will accidentally make a couple of good changes to our basic law?

Unfortunately, I have almost no other hopes left.
Author:
220 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Separ DNR
    Separ DNR 16 July 2019 05: 23
    +19
    Will Putin not turn into Leader of the Nation?
    Hmmm recourse...
    Considering he (Putin) created and brought to absolutism the system of "manual control" of the state, and the practically absence of a "bench", what the hell is not kidding?

    But at the same time, though:
    Quote: A. Block
    Yes, we are Scythians! Yes, Asians - we,
    With slanted and greedy eyes!

    Not in Russian is a tradition No. . The people will not understand.

    Although ... Who will ask him. The people then? Who needs it ...
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 16 July 2019 05: 53
      +31
      Quote: Separ DNR
      Will Putin not turn into Leader of the Nation?
      Hmmm recourse...
      Considering he (Putin) created and brought to absolutism the system of "manual control" of the state

      rather, already brought to the point of absurdity ... brother-in-law, relatives, former bodyguards ...
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 16 July 2019 05: 56
        +4
        Quote: Separ DNR
        Considering he (Putin) created and brought to absolutism the system of "manual control" of the state, and the practically absence of a "bench", what the hell is not kidding?

        Quote: Aerodrome
        rather, already brought to the point of absurdity ... brother-in-law, relatives, former bodyguards ...

        And this is implied, of course. I just didn't "hit below the belt" ...
        1. Aerodrome
          Aerodrome 16 July 2019 05: 57
          +22
          Quote: Separ DNR
          I just didn't "hit below the belt" ...

          they beat us, why pity them?
          1. Separ DNR
            Separ DNR 16 July 2019 06: 03
            +21
            Quote: Aerodrome
            they beat us, why pity them?

            The bottom line is that we (DPR and LPR) are dill, the Russian government has, and I try to speak sharply about the Kremlin on this topic.
            But since the illusory prospect of becoming YOU (Russia) "dawns" in front of us, I also speak on Russian topics within. CAREFULLY.

            The truth is not always obtained. For sometimes words are not enough, only expressions remain.
            1. Aerodrome
              Aerodrome 16 July 2019 06: 05
              +5
              Quote: Separ DNR
              Quote: Aerodrome
              they beat us, why pity them?

              The bottom line is that we (DPR and LPR) are dill, the Russian government has, and I try to speak sharply about the Kremlin on this topic.
              But since the illusory prospect of becoming YOU (Russia) is "dawning" in front of us, I also speak on this topic. CAREFULLY.
              The truth is not always obtained. For sometimes words are not enough, only expressions remain.

              got it
              1. Monster_Fat
                Monster_Fat 16 July 2019 06: 51
                +7
                Probably the best way would be to restore the monarchy with a new dynasty and a new Duma nobility .... everything is almost ready for this and the disenfranchised serfs-servants around, already, too, are full ..... yes
                1. Stas157
                  Stas157 16 July 2019 08: 18
                  +20
                  These do not go away themselves. For twenty years, the place was not warmed in order to transfer it to another. I redid the constitution for this, increased the terms for myself ... and then I’ll come up with something! Already announced that, they say, he is not leaving politics. So those who are worried can calm down, the galley slave will not throw the oar, will remain in one capacity or another.
                2. kakvastam
                  kakvastam 16 July 2019 12: 56
                  +5
                  They have been playing with this for a quarter of a century. At first, due to illiteracy, they hoped to restore the dynasty, which had been abolished in February XNUMX, with Yeltsin as regent, then people in the know, it seems, explained, they began to pump “Orthodoxy” with an eye to re-establishment of the monarchy with the election of a new autocrat.

                  So wait a short time left.
                3. RUSS
                  RUSS 18 July 2019 14: 07
                  0
                  Quote: Monster_Fat
                  Probably the best solution would be to restore the monarchy with a new dynasty

                  Kabaeva Queen!
              2. depressant
                depressant 16 July 2019 09: 19
                +8
                To prevent Russia's slipping into the bad monarchy of 1914, I propose to introduce the following points into the Constitution:

                1. land, mineral resources and other natural riches of Russia cannot be private property, while the land is leased by the state for one or another period for efficient operation (housing, industrial production, agriculture);

                2. the mining industry and the first redistribution cannot belong to a private person;

                3. The owner of the means of production is obliged to be effective, and those who:

                a) does not use them in the interests of the common good (takes income abroad above the permissible norm);
                b) does not produce goods necessary for society (low quality of goods, palm oil as an example, etc.);
                c) does not provide citizens of his country with jobs (hires migrant workers in excess of the quota, or pays low salaries, does not provide safety measures, etc. - that is, provides a worker with something that cannot be recognized as a workplace that meets the accepted standards) ;
                d) does not comply with environmental requirements (smoke, discharge into waste water bodies, etc.);
                e) there is a corruption component in the activity.

                Items can be added.
                In all these cases, the means of production (buildings, constructions, machinery, land) are seized by the court free of charge in favor of the state, which can either close the production altogether or sell it to the owner who has already proved effective, but within the framework of antitrust laws.
                Such norms were, for example, introduced into the Constitution of Germany in 1949, which allowed this country to gradually increase its production and successfully get out of the post-war ruin, to become a European economic leader. In France, similar constitutional changes were introduced earlier - in 1946.
                1. Doctor
                  Doctor 16 July 2019 11: 49
                  -9
                  Will not help.
                  It’s not about the laws; they are formally liberal and democratic even under Dzhugashvili.
                  The main problem is the lack of civil society, or simply a slave psychology of the majority of the population. This happened historically: first under the Mongols, then under the kings, then under the Communists.
                  All hope for the younger generation.
                  1. Honest Citizen
                    Honest Citizen 16 July 2019 12: 04
                    +8
                    All hope for the younger generation.

                    Is that under McDonald's and Coca-Cola? No, thank you ...
                    1. Doctor
                      Doctor 16 July 2019 14: 17
                      +3
                      But there are still no others.
                      As F. Ranevskaya said: “Of course, modern youth is terrible. But what’s even worse is that we don’t belong to her. ” laughing
                  2. Sunstorm
                    Sunstorm 16 July 2019 16: 19
                    +6
                    from your point of view just a couple of clarifications possible? Who were the French before taking the Bastille? What did they have with society? After all, the French are the most freedom-loving people of Europe? And who was not yet under the kings? Maybe the Germans? Can you recall what Prussian absolutism is? Maybe the Swedes were not under kings? Oh, the Swedes and now under the king .. but stop there and socialism and the king ... Maybe the Spaniards? yes it is there in general the gloom of colonialism and even the birthplace of the Inquisition in general those still smerds .. The Italians, the British? What kind of people have we been democratic for most of our history? Ahhhh Poles and their gentry, the only example in the world, although the stop there was also full of disenfranchised servants, and indeed the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth ended badly ... precisely because of these freedoms. In general, if anyone has a slave psychology, it’s yours personally. Or you don’t know a damn thing about the world history of mankind .... I recommend starting the study from India ..
                    Well of course I forgot about the USA ... but how old is the USA? what will they turn into? And how long have Black stopped being planted in a separate part of the bus?
                    1. Doctor
                      Doctor 16 July 2019 18: 24
                      +4
                      Perhaps you are right. Probably the truth in Russia the Golden Age was under the rule of a German, and ordinary people lived best under the leadership of a Georgian.
                      But I was talking about something else. The French, in order to take to the streets in yellow vests, had enough to raise fuel prices by 5%. And we swallowed pension reform and no one even meowed. So, slave psychology is not only with me personally.
                      1. Sunstorm
                        Sunstorm 18 July 2019 15: 16
                        +1
                        "Slave psychology" is generally a stamp that you inherited from not very smart ideologists from the USSR, just remember who raised all the revolutions? "Slaves" therefore there is a contradiction here .. it is impossible with "slave psychology" to raise slaves to revolt .. Spartacus .. or Sicily. Take this stamp out of everyday life, it is completely erroneous. Moreover, please note that our officials-the people are not nice \ not right .. And our fighters for the people-the people are not nice, not right ..
                      2. Doctor
                        Doctor 19 July 2019 22: 06
                        -1
                        Slaves cannot make revolutions. Can you imagine that the villagers of the Voronezh region organize and overthrow the current government? At best, a powerful riot.
                        Revolutions, as a rule, are organized and directed by a group that has stood out from the elite and is not happy with its position or the actions of state leaders. They are inside the government, know the laws of its functioning, have finances and connections. The people follow them (or do not follow) and create a critical mass that breaks the system.
                      3. Sunstorm
                        Sunstorm 19 July 2019 23: 10
                        0
                        At one time, the "village" people of the Tambov region (which is not so far from Voronezh) organized themselves very well and refuted your thesis (in my personal opinion) .. It turns out that the former "disenfranchised" inhabitants of the Empire could organize .. and the former residents USSR (with its socialism, new man and higher education cannot)
                        But I digress, and forgive me what is the difference for you between "rebellion" and "revolution" .. Rebellion is when it is suppressed, and revolution is when it is successful?
                        Quote: Arzt
                        Slaves cannot make revolutions.
                        Do you know this discovery for me, you can do exactly the same and you need to do the examples you need?
                        Quote: Arzt
                        Revolutions are usually organized and directed by a group that stands out from the elite,
                        - I won’t even argue) I will clarify They can make slaves, They cannot direct (you can direct what you do ...), Organize - they can (they can’t write works on the theory of revolution, but they can practically organize them). Did you know that slaves can consider yourself an elite?) (not to be of course in reality to it)
                        Quote: Arzt
                        The people follow them (or do not follow) and create a critical mass that breaks the system.
                        here, on the whole, I disagree, it’s not possible to break the system of the state, you can only break the state itself, since the system is the foundation and walls and roof of the state.
                      4. Doctor
                        Doctor 20 July 2019 18: 06
                        0
                        Tambov Riot. (What revolution?)

                        Yes, rebellion is when it is crushed, and the revolution is successful.

                        In terms of structure and state, just the opposite is true: Russia was, is and will be, it doesn’t matter with tsars, general secretaries or presidents.

                        As to whether slaves can commit, direct and organize.

                        The leaders of the American Revolution - the United States Founding Fathers Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, Levingston, Madison, Hamilton, Washington - are all the elite of society: financiers, large landowners, scholars, and of course lawyers. The common people naturally participated actively, creating a revolutionary mass.

                        Soldiers and officers of the French six-thousandth corps of the Marquis of Rocheambault, who fought on the side of the rebels in the US War of Independence, dragged the seditious republican idea into France. The leaders of the French Revolution Mirabeau, Lafayette, Demoulin, Robespierre, Marat - all of them are representatives of far from the lower classes of society. The people are right there, actively participating: destroying the Bastille, charging the guillotine, emptying the wine cellars.

                        25 after the Bastille, Russian troops enter Paris. Thirty thousandth case of Count Vorontsov remains in France for 3 years. Upon returning to Russia, the soldiers and officers bring not only memories of sweet wine and tender French women, but also the seditious idea that you can live without a king. In December 1925, the idea materializes on the Field of Mars. The leaders of the Decembrists are solid noblemen (before the princes) and senior officers. The people, as always, quickly approached the scene, but did not have time to frolic - the rebellion was quickly crushed.

                        The Decembrists were hanged and transplanted, but the bearers of the idea did not disappear, they have been active throughout the 19th century: they write poems and articles, go to the people, and sometimes kill sovereigns. Among the Narodnaya Volya people there are many representatives of the middle class (raznochintsy), but there are also noblemen. However, the February Revolution of 1917 was again carried out by immigrants from the upper classes. Russia's usual hunger riot, which at another time would have been crushed in 3 days, against the backdrop of a big war, a weak king, a sick heir, etc. turns into a revolution. At the head of the rebels, representatives of the State Duma (Rodzianko, Guchkov), the betrayal of senior Army officers led by Alekseev completes the case.
                        The people come off to the fullest, in order to calm them down, the Bolsheviks have to carry out decimation - to kill every tenth inhabitant of the country.
                2. WIKI
                  WIKI 16 July 2019 12: 32
                  +6
                  Quote: depressant
                  mineral resources and other natural riches of Russia cannot be private property

                  They are constitutionally owned by the people.
                  1. mr_ise
                    mr_ise 16 July 2019 13: 05
                    +2
                    Have you read the Constitution for a long time? Article 72. 1. The joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the constituent entities of the Russian Federation shall include: c) issues of ownership, use and disposal of land, subsoil, water and other natural resources.
                    Where is it said about the people?
                    1. WIKI
                      WIKI 16 July 2019 15: 23
                      +3
                      Quote: mr_ise
                      Where is it said about the people?

                      Article 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation states that the bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people. The people exercise their power directly, as well as through public authorities and local authorities.
                3. naidas
                  naidas 16 July 2019 13: 29
                  +2
                  Quote: depressant
                  I propose to introduce into the Constitution

                  Yes, you can make anything on paper, I wonder how much money will be allocated for the reform of the Constitution and whether it is possible to participate.
                4. Rostislav
                  Rostislav 16 July 2019 16: 24
                  +3
                  There is logic in such proposals, but it is dangerous - they will start to take away production under a fictitious pretext (for example, “draw” a violation of ecology - just spit) and pass it on to “friends”. It’s not just the laws, but how they are enforced.
        2. akunin
          akunin 16 July 2019 08: 22
          +1
          Quote: Separ DNR
          I just didn't "hit below the belt" ...

          one name for "elbasy" is a kick below the belt. "Elbasy" will take root in our country, not the head of state (ate-country, bass-head) unequivocally (it hurts to "oh your mother's like" - a quote from a Soviet-era anecdote about the collective farm named after Rabindranath Tagore). Kazakhs - thank you. laughing
          1. AUL
            AUL 16 July 2019 09: 49
            +11
            Quote: akunin
            collective farm named after rabindranath tagore

            The name of Lope de Vega ... But this does not change the essence.
            I read the article, and somehow it became sad. The people wonder what else they will come up with up there? What else will the master suit us? Will he put you completely with cancer or will he allow you to breathe a little? And then no one will ask us where the master tells - there the herd will wander, loving (according to the law) the power. And no one without sarcasm recalls the line of the constitution that "the power in the country belongs to the people" ...
            1. akunin
              akunin 16 July 2019 10: 14
              +1
              Will it put cancer at all or will it still allow you to breathe a little?
              won't allow
              "To drag and not to let go"
              From the sketch "Booth" (1868). The hero is a security officer (a police officer of the lowest rank, who served near the booth, which was for him a shelter from the weather, and sometimes a dwelling) Mymretsov. His duties "were, firstly, to" drag "and, secondly," not to let go "; he usually dragged where they decidedly did not want to get, and did not let go where they deadly wanted." became a symbol of stupid arbitrariness.
              Assumption Hleb (1843-1902) from the latter (not quite in the subject, but the same vector
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvVlmn4YDnA
      2. Greg Miller
        Greg Miller 16 July 2019 11: 05
        +9
        Putin cannot become Elbasy, because he has already turned into Yeltsin !!!!
        1. Vladimir T
          Vladimir T 16 July 2019 13: 11
          -9
          Under Yeltsin walked under the table?
    2. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 16 July 2019 06: 43
      -4
      Quote: Separ DNR
      This is not a tradition in Russian. The people will not understand.

      Although ... Who will ask him. The people then? Who needs it ...

      This is the last presidential term of Vladimir Putin. What will happen next ... we will live to see ... If only not for a new one Gorbachev!
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 16 July 2019 06: 45
        +6
        Quote: 30 vis
        If only not for the new Gorbachev!

        Sounds like : “If only there was no war”... Tension, and soars in the air ...
      2. Gardamir
        Gardamir 16 July 2019 08: 08
        +19
        The last presidential term of Vladimir Putin.
        and did you believe?
        And the new Gorbachev has been in the Kremlin since 2000, and this has become especially noticeable in recent years.
      3. New Year day
        New Year day 16 July 2019 09: 45
        +12
        Quote: 30 vis
        This is the last presidential term of Vladimir Putin.

        he himself said so ... once

        And nothing has changed
      4. Skay
        Skay 16 July 2019 10: 55
        +10
        This is the last presidential term of Vladimir Putin.

        Yes, what a problem! They will make the first royal.
      5. Catfish
        Catfish 16 July 2019 14: 01
        +3
        This is the last presidential term of Vladimir Putin.


        Are you sure that by its end the client will simply die? Although, who knows ....
      6. Kito
        Kito 17 July 2019 13: 18
        +1
        everything can be
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 16 July 2019 07: 03
      +16
      As Zhvanetsky said, what you protect is what you have. The guarantor has the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all reforms are not for the people, but for himself and his party EP. Power just does not surrender.
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 16 July 2019 07: 06
        +4
        Quote: siberalt
        The guarantor has a Constitution and all reforms are not for the people, but for himself and his party EP.

      2. Boris55
        Boris55 16 July 2019 08: 34
        -18
        Quote: siberalt
        The guarantor has the Constitution of the Russian Federation and all reforms are not for the people, but for himself and his party EP.

        1. The current Constitution is adopted in 1993. Putin, when it was created, did not stand nearby.


        2. Today, the leader of the EP is Medvedev. Putin refused EP services back in the 2012 year, when he created a new management structure for the elections - ONF. In the 2018 year, he refused it and went as an independent.

        Why does he work with EP? This is the only force capable of accepting the Laws and enforcing them.
        Why is the EP "promoting" Putin? Because the people vote for Putin.


        Will he leave politics forever? Not. Will he be president after 2024? Not.
        1. Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat 16 July 2019 08: 44
          +14
          ABOUT! "Boris" (accent on the first syllable) was noted .... How, is there your famous phrase: "Russia-people-Putin" - is doing well? winked
          1. Boris55
            Boris55 16 July 2019 09: 00
            -12
            Quote: Monster_Fat
            ABOUT! "Boris" (stress on the first syllable) was noted ...

            As I understand it, yours from those ones that scored 3.5% (statistical error) up to the heap? laughing



            You can joke over Putin for as long as you want, but the people, even after all the anti-people’s laws adopted by the Duma (which does not go beyond the current Constitution), are still on Putin’s side.

            Only after a change in the social system is it possible to radically change the Constitution. Pulling a sheep’s skin on a wolf does not make sense.

            How to change the social system without revolution - see:
            - restructuring No.1 - NEP;
            - restructuring No.2 - thaw;
            - restructuring No. 3 - restructuring.
            1. Monster_Fat
              Monster_Fat 16 July 2019 09: 06
              +13
              How do I understand yours from these?

              "Not a fig", you do not understand .... "my own" - they run in a gray skin and gnaw a horse in a ditch ... Maybe now, you will understand ... wink And "the people for Putin" ... I will not even comment on this opus. yes
              1. Boris55
                Boris55 16 July 2019 09: 17
                -9
                Quote: Monster_Fat
                "Not a fig", you do not understand .... "my own" - running in a gray skin and gnawing a horse in a ditch ...

                Maybe you will realize that the last hut burns first and no matter what neutral you are, the choice ultimately always comes down to yours: yours is a stranger, and if you don’t make a choice, be the bats and one and the other.
                1. 2 Level Advisor
                  2 Level Advisor 16 July 2019 10: 48
                  +9
                  Boris, if you are not a Troll, then I would like to live in the same illusory world ...
                  1. Beringovsky
                    Beringovsky 16 July 2019 14: 12
                    +13
                    The thought of Boris, which he is trying to push through with the stubbornness of the paver, is primitively simple in essence - Putin is good, trust him and do not rock the boat.
                    The problem is that in fact the entire state system in modern Russia is based on Putin's name. Therefore, from every iron they rub us about how great Putin is. When it sounds "and the king
            2. New Year day
              New Year day 16 July 2019 10: 00
              +9
              Quote: Boris55

              As I understand it, yours from those ones that scored 3.5% (statistical error) up to the heap?

              But does the government, in principle, want the opposition, and especially now?
              I think no. The authorities are afraid that amid falling ratings and irritation of the people, the presence of non-systemic opposition in legitimate bodies can lead to great upheaval - and in the long run, to the collapse of the government itself. You can laugh and slander the persons you have brought, but in the event of chaos, they will not take power. It will be taken by those of which we do not even suspect. And it is much worse for the country. And the opposition is very important for any government, so that the nose is not bullied and stolen. But power is precisely for this, and is sharpened by the lack of control over their actions.
              Quote: Boris55
              You can joke over Putin for as long as you want, but the people, even after all the anti-people’s laws adopted by the Duma (which does not go beyond the current Constitution), are still on Putin’s side.

              in Russia from love to hate is one step. If the GDP was confident in the people's love for it, it would not have created the Rosguard.
              Quote: Boris55
              Only after a change in the social system is it possible to radically change the Constitution.

              who will change him- "Asharukovs" in power? Don't make people laugh
              1. Boris55
                Boris55 16 July 2019 11: 36
                -8
                Quote: Silvestr
                The authorities are afraid that amid falling ratings and irritation of the people, the presence of non-systemic opposition in legitimate bodies can lead to great upheaval - and in the long run, to the collapse of the government itself.

                Power is afraid - this means, and you understand that there are no revolutionary ways to change it.

                The authorities are afraid, but why do people vote with such obstinacy for this power and do not allow this power to go into history? In the fall, elections will be held in most of Russia. So let's see who the people will vote for, which counters for the presidential election they will choose.

                Quote: Silvestr
                If the GDP was confident in the people's love for it, it would not have created the Rosguard.

                Putin, having created the Russian Guard, reassigned the power structures of local barons to the state, thereby depriving them of power support. It is right. The right to violence must belong to the state.

                Quote: Silvestr
                who will change him

                Do you need someone who is the only one at Calvary for all? It will be quickly cleaned up, but if each of us, not in words but in our thoughts, rejects the exploitation of man by man as the norm, then the government will not be able to steer in the old way. I already gave an example with vouchers. If we had not led them, we would not have sold the Motherland.
                1. New Year day
                  New Year day 16 July 2019 13: 20
                  +10
                  Quote: Boris55
                  In the fall, elections will be held in most of Russia. So let's see who the people will vote for

                  of course. That's just why they remove unwanted candidates from the registration and why do all the candidates unanimously reject the EP?
                  Do you seriously believe that the elections are HONEST? Excuse me, but I don’t want to listen to this noodle

                  Quote: Boris55
                  Putin, having created the Russian Guard, reassigned the power structures of local barons to the state, thereby depriving them of power support.

                  do not make me laugh! All these barons meekly sit in their place

                  Ex-Governor Khoroshavin
                  1. Sergey1987
                    Sergey1987 16 July 2019 16: 06
                    0
                    Quote: Silvestr
                    That's just why they remove from the registration of objectionable candidates

                    Who for example?
                2. Honest Citizen
                  Honest Citizen 16 July 2019 18: 38
                  +2
                  Boris, a prime example:
                  https://news.rambler.ru/community/42506976-rosgvardiya-zayavila-o-prave-sotrudnikov-ne-predstavlyatsya/?utm_source=head_old&utm_campaign=self_promo&utm_medium=mcol&utm_content=news
                  Do not be lazy, read.
                  Now imagine how many fraudsters will now be mowed under it?
                  This, of course, is not Putin's fault? :)
              2. kakvastam
                kakvastam 16 July 2019 13: 12
                +5
                Quote: Silvestr
                in Russia from love to hate is one step.

                Emotions have the ability to change sign while maintaining intensity, and the more popular the hype, the more terrible the hatred will be.
                But this is still a long way off, people are rather phlegmatic: they don’t react to a certain level, and then breaks off coils.
                1. New Year day
                  New Year day 16 July 2019 13: 44
                  +2
                  Quote: kakvastam
                  But this is still a long way off, people are rather phlegmatic: they don’t react to a certain level, and then breaks off coils.

                  "Where is the beginning of that end, which ends with the beginning" K. Prutkov
              3. Sergey1987
                Sergey1987 16 July 2019 16: 04
                -5
                Quote: Silvestr
                in Russia from love to hate is one step. If the GDP was confident in the people's love for it, it would not have created the Rosguard.

                I see you are not tired of carrying nonsense. The Russian Guard is created on the basis of the Ministry of Internal Affairs BB, and those, in turn, are based on the USSR BB. You at least bothered to read something.
          2. Revival
            Revival 16 July 2019 10: 35
            +17
            Boris has such a mantra. It is included by keywords like "Siri" or "Alice", the main thing is to load variations of the answer / question.
            When necessary, the president is independent, when necessary, powerless ...
            The reason is programmed according to the situation.
        2. vic02
          vic02 16 July 2019 09: 42
          +3
          People certainly vote for Putin, but only official results in the absence of systemic violations of the electoral legislation by the authorities would be completely different. At least one person from throwing ballots for EdRo, Putin, their proteges, from those who arranged and arranges elective representations in Primorye, St. Petersburg, Moscow and the region in favor of those in power suffered punishment?
          1. New Year day
            New Year day 16 July 2019 13: 47
            +9
            Quote: vic02
            their henchmen, from those who arranged and arrange election performances in Primorye, St. Petersburg, Moscow and the region in favor of those in power, were punished?

            Registration denied at Moscow City Duma:
            Ilya Yashin, Dmitry Gudkov, Konstantin Yankauskas, Lyubov Sobol, and even one of the leaders of the Yabloko party, Sergei Mitrokhin.
            As they assure themselves, TEC members intentionally incorrectly drove the names and surnames of people who signed up into the databases and, of course, did not find them. The situation with human rights activist Andrei Babushkin turned out to be even more interesting. Grandmother introduced in TEC 5792 Signature in support of his nomination, and in response received a protocol that 6035 signatures were declared invalid.
            Churov lived, Churov alive
        3. New Year day
          New Year day 16 July 2019 10: 09
          +12
          Quote: Boris55
          The current Constitution was adopted in 1993. Putin, when it was created, did not stand nearby.

          certainly, but stood, sat next to her creators-

          Quote: Boris55
          To date, the leader of the EP is Medvedev. Putin refused EP services back in 2012, when he created a new management structure for the elections - ONF. In 2018, he refused it and went as an independent.

          and how is the ONF different from EP?
          Quote: Boris55
          Why does he work with EP? This is the only force capable of accepting the Laws and enforcing them.

          unconditionally, but those that suit IT!

          That is why HE is so "successful" in fighting prices
          Quote: Boris55
          Will he leave politics forever? Not. Will he be president after 2024? Not.

          never. NOT for that he built his power to give it away.
          He will be He "Leader of the Nation" or will remain the president of the country on-drum: nothing will change, HE and his team will rule to the end. It is not yet clear who is theirs or their country
          1. Revival
            Revival 16 July 2019 10: 37
            +14
            No need to beat Boris so severely with photographs on microcircuits, he is not to blame, the program is ...
          2. Boris55
            Boris55 16 July 2019 11: 45
            -13
            Quote: Silvestr
            certainly, but stood, sat next to her creators-

            Damn belay And I, just recently, was next to the Kremlin wassat

            Quote: Silvestr
            and how is the ONF different from EP?

            Already nothing, so he refused their services. You persecute them at the door, so they will narm out the window ...

            Quote: Silvestr
            That is why HE is so "successful" in fighting prices

            He did not accept such laws, and in general any laws allowing to create such. This is to our elect in the Duma.

            Quote: Silvestr
            nothing will change

            Nothing will change whoever comes. The concept will remain the same until we change the vector of goals: from capitalism to socialism of the Stalinist model. How to do this without noise and dust - we learn from the bourgeoisie, how they carried out three perestroika. The first - blocked by Stalin, the second - the people of Novocherkask (1962 year), the latter - was crowned with success.
            1. New Year day
              New Year day 16 July 2019 13: 02
              +10
              Quote: Boris55
              And I, just recently, was next to the Kremlin

              So what? I have not seen EBN and GDP more than once from about 20 meters. Am I their companion?
              Quote: Boris55
              Already nothing, so he refused their services.

              conclusion: everything that creates power turns into feces
              Quote: Boris55
              He did not accept such laws, and in general any laws allowing to create such

              right, but he signed them all. And on pension reform, they stood up for their protection, then I agree.
              And then. how do you explain his words:


              Quote: Boris55
              The concept will remain the same until we change the vector of goals: from capitalism to socialism of the Stalinist model.


              these these will change the concept?

        4. sunzhenets
          sunzhenets 16 July 2019 10: 34
          +13
          Quote: Boris55
          Because people vote for Putin.

          How people evaluate the president, it was visible on the Internet according to the estimates of the straight line (likes / dislikes more than 1/10) and his New Year’s address, to which comments were turned off. Therefore, 76% are no more plausible than 146% of 2011.
          According to the article. We do not have a procedure for recalling a deputy by voters. We have half of the Duma of athletes and artists, half of the Duma have residence permits and citizenship of other states. Good government from the parliament in its current form can not be expected.
          1. Nikolay73
            Nikolay73 16 July 2019 12: 13
            -4
            I don’t think that likes / dislikes are all right, I’m for Putin, but I didn’t "like", I worked and now what? These are rather emotions, and they are often not friendly with logic. Do I need to do something in our country - of course, is there now for me another contender for the presidency - no. IMHO.
            1. kakvastam
              kakvastam 16 July 2019 13: 18
              +1
              The number of "huskies" lovers is negligible in percentage terms, and for every one who does not "bark" there are a dozen who do not "break", so this argument does not work.

              And the fact that Mr. Putin’s supporters have no other candidates for his place is not at all surprising.
              1. sunzhenets
                sunzhenets 16 July 2019 13: 52
                +3
                Quote: kakvastam
                The number of "huskies" lovers is negligible in percentage terms, and for every one who does not "bark" there are a dozen who do not "break", so this argument does not work.

                C'mon, it doesn't work. A certain number of people looked a straight line. Someone did not give an assessment (among them were supporters and opponents of the president). Someone set. Like / dislike in this case is an assessment of the president’s activities by the population. And for 1 positive rating more than 10 negative.
                Moreover, this is an objective statistic, because 99% of the population use the Internet.
                1. kakvastam
                  kakvastam 16 July 2019 14: 10
                  0
                  Still, functional illiteracy is the scourge of our time.
                  Nikolay73 wrote that he did not "like", which means that the ratio "for" / "against" is wrong. You object to him, but for some reason you are addressing me.

                  Quote: Sunflower
                  Moreover, this is an objective statistic, because 99% of the population use the Internet.

                  This is just brilliant! I’ll leave 99% on your conscience, but the fact that 100% of bots use the Internet is beyond doubt, and it is impossible to evaluate the power of the troll factories of the warring parties.
          2. Qwertyarion
            Qwertyarion 16 July 2019 12: 39
            +3
            Quote: Sunflower
            half of the Duma has residence permits and citizenship of other states.

            And this is just in case, because there are different cases ...
            So, if it happens that it’s bad, you have to rush around, sell your property, transfer money, take your family out, and then, business, get to the airport, and buy a ticket and ... don’t remember badly.
          3. Sergey1987
            Sergey1987 16 July 2019 16: 09
            -3
            Quote: Sunflower
            As people evaluate the president, it was visible on the Internet according to estimates of a straight line (likes / dislikes of more than 1/10) and his New Year’s address,

            Are you laughing Is this your indicator?
        5. Vladimir T
          Vladimir T 16 July 2019 13: 14
          -4
          Do not spoil the general ecstasy of local liberals. They excite each other with delirium. Give them for cum. And then they are screwing up.
        6. WIKI
          WIKI 16 July 2019 15: 47
          0
          Quote: Boris55
          This is the only force capable of accepting the Laws and enforcing them.

          This force is engaged in lawlessness.
        7. Herman 4223
          Herman 4223 18 July 2019 10: 19
          0
          You are mistaken, the USAID company wrote the constitution to us. These individuals only stood aside.
    4. knn54
      knn54 16 July 2019 08: 23
      +3
      -Gray: "not in the Russian tradition" ...
      There are no "ZHUZov" in the Russian Federation
      Here is the king, the emperor is this. yes. THE WHOLE dynasty ever started with someone ...
      PS And the FSB warned that "stuffing" would begin. We will watch.
      PP.S And Shoigu Field Marshal, or Generalissimo ...
    5. Underwater hunter
      Underwater hunter 16 July 2019 12: 11
      +3
      Quote: Separ DNR
      Although ... Who will ask him. The people then? Who needs it ...

      For the time being .. and then the people will start asking from them .. You don’t have to expect anything good from these, they proved themselves to be full in 20 years then ..
      1. Separ DNR
        Separ DNR 16 July 2019 13: 11
        +3
        Quote: Underwater Hunter
        then people will start asking from them ..

        I would not want it to come to that ... Russia does not need shocks akin to shocks of the beginning of the XNUMXth century ...
        But, unfortunately, the government itself leads to this ... And if it blazes ... I don’t even know if Russia as a state will be able to stand up because of internal strife and vulture attacks from the outside.
        But there will be attacks, and no longer sanctions ...

        God give the mind power ...
        1. WIKI
          WIKI 16 July 2019 16: 04
          +1
          Quote: Separ DNR
          then people will start asking from them ..

          I would not want it to come to this ...

          I don’t want shocks either. And probably any sane person doesn’t want that either. Only I really do not like it when our government, in order to exclude the slightest possibility of protests, scares the people with horror stories: "It will be like in Ukraine", "It will be like in France." Our people are smart, and I hope he will figure out what to do. And there will be no shocks because the changes will begin not with the people, but with the elites, who are tired of fearing not only punishment, but also the unpredictability of the future.
    6. nafanal
      nafanal 19 July 2019 14: 21
      0
      It will not turn out .. Too smart .. Deng Xiaoping is a good option. As for the bench, he has no sons. Lukashenko has .. And you don’t have to think about the people that he is stupider than he really is. The liberal bastard in 17 also thought that no one needed the people
  2. Thrifty
    Thrifty 16 July 2019 05: 24
    +3
    The new version of the Constitution should stipulate that the prime minister, like the president of the country, as well as the Supreme Council, as well as the State Duma, its members and members are elected and re-elected for a maximum of 2 terms of 5 FIVE years! After that, a deputy or prime minister LIFE does not even have the right to run for central government! In the local, it is possible, but where he spent his time getting a huge salary, he does not have the right to even be present as a guest! But in general, the Constitution of the country needs to be rewritten, because it does not allow the country to live for real. We are obliged to constitutionally secure the right of a private owner to use the natural resources of the country only as a tenant, and for a period not exceeding 30 years! And the bowels should de facto belong to the population of the country, and not to a bunch of crooks, these bowels are robbers!
    1. Bastinda
      Bastinda 16 July 2019 06: 28
      0
      Clinical death, or to whom, is pushed. laughing
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 16 July 2019 07: 07
      +5
      Until they make a complete lustration of officials from EP, nothing will change. winked
      1. depressant
        depressant 16 July 2019 09: 29
        -1
        Here, Lean and Sibirbalt have already made sensible suggestions. Other colleagues, do not hang your noses! More optimism! Offer and justify, we must show what we expect from the authorities.
      2. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 16 July 2019 09: 52
        -1
        sibiralt (Oleg) Today, 07: 07

        Until they make a complete lustration of officials from the United Russia, nothing will change. winked "" ""

        Make it .. castration. sorry. lustration - others will come wink

        Politics has become a business ... all along the vertical.
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 16 July 2019 11: 12
        +5
        Quote: siberalt
        Until they make a complete lustration of officials from EP, nothing will change. winked

        In the coming September, the people in the regions should not polish the stools in the kitchens with the fifth point, but firmly remember the "Edrosov's pranks" with the retirement age, VAT, growing tariffs, fines for fishing, etc. - go to vote against representatives of United Russia making their way to power in the regions. This is certainly not lustration (some kind of bad word), but it works and the power is annoying. Last year, four regions were beaten off from the "edra" out of 18 who participated in the elections. It seems that in some regions out of 14 "Edro" also lost, but the pocket electoral commissions have successfully worked with rigging and pulled the "right" candidates by the ears. The four regions of the "renegade" are only those where the result of the defeat of the ruling party was so obvious that manipulation of the calculations could lead to a social explosion and the United Russia chose to back down. This event greatly strained them, because soon a couple of large party gatherings were held, where their party bosses reproaching the party flock for the "macaroshki" and for "no one asked you to give birth" offered to work out a standard for "the moral character of a United Russia party" - like, "Though you are demons, but the mask of an angel must be worn like a robe, at least during the whole working day. " Realizing that the phrase "member of the United Russia party" is perceived by the people more negatively than (even) tolerantly, and their candidates nominated for the seat in September will meet with serious distrust from the voters, their (United Russia candidates) in "risky" regions, where the ruling party has completely lost the instinct of self-preservation, they will push through as self-nominated candidates. Why am I, but actually to the fact that all laws that infringe on the rights of Russians, we pass "by a majority vote" with the active participation of the majority party in the Duma, namely "United Russia". So it will be with the Constitution, when amendments to the basic law are adopted without a national referendum, but by a majority vote in the Duma. This will be explained by the fact that the people themselves, with their votes "delegated" them to power, and therefore entrusted them, the "best of the best", to make fateful decisions, just as it was with the pension reform. I suppose that in addition to the question of the succession of power, the distribution of functions (president-government, (parliament?)), Attempts to formulate some semblance of state ideology, the concept of "Russia is a social state" will be deleted in order to remove social obligations from the state to the population and provide he has every right to study and be treated (other buns) at his own expense - there are babos, get treatment from doctors, no babos, get treatment from a healer. If the changes to the Constitution are promoted before the elections to the State Duma (2019-2020), then we can say that it will be the Constitution of Edra, and if this event mentioned by Kuzovkov occurs after the elections to the State Duma, which will take place in 2021, then the people have a chance to cut the number of edra's mandates in the Duma and participate in the referendum, thereby defending some of their rights. In short, you have to go to vote and do it deliberately.
        1. WIKI
          WIKI 16 July 2019 16: 42
          +1
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Last year, four regions were recaptured from Edr

          Do you seriously consider the LDPR opponents of the EP? This is the same in my opinion.
          1. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 16 July 2019 19: 47
            +1
            Quote: Victor Biryukov
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            Last year, four regions were recaptured from Edr

            Do you seriously consider the LDPR opponents of the EP? This is the same in my opinion.
            But did I even mention LDPR in my comment ???
            I do not want to indulge in florid arguments about who is there in the Duma with whom is friends with "houses" i.e. parties and who is playing along with whom portraying the opposition, but the fact is that 4 regions have gone from under the noses of United Russia. Here, in itself, the emerging tendency for the growth of the protest mood of Russians against United Russia is important. It is very interesting what the elections will show in the coming September.
            1. WIKI
              WIKI 16 July 2019 21: 29
              +1
              Khabarovsk Territory has not gone anywhere. The wagon left everything, as with EP:
      4. Underwater hunter
        Underwater hunter 16 July 2019 12: 13
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        Until they make a complete lustration of officials from EP, nothing will change. winked

        There everyone needs to be lustrated, except Poklonskaya and the Communist Party ..
        1. Qwertyarion
          Qwertyarion 16 July 2019 12: 42
          0
          Quote: Underwater Hunter
          Everyone needs to be lustrated there, except Poklonskaya

          And do sectarians have any special privileges during lustration?
      5. Vladimir T
        Vladimir T 16 July 2019 13: 16
        0
        Chew! Crested words, lustration. Hto here?
      6. WIKI
        WIKI 16 July 2019 16: 36
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        Until they make a complete lustration of officials from EP, nothing will change.

        If you make a complete lustration of the courts, the EP itself will disappear. And in place of the old judges to appoint graduates of law schools. Well, of course, something needs to be fixed in the system itself so that they do not get rid of it.
    3. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 16 July 2019 08: 59
      -3
      Under the Constitution, the year 77, the bowels and so on (hereinafter referred to as the text) belonged to PEOPLE .... and what, a lot of the population of the USSR was raped by all this? And what is the result?
      and a lease for 30 years regarding mineral resources and other things is pointless, if leased, then at least 49, and not just pump, but from geology to processing the deepest, otherwise it makes no sense
      1. Underwater hunter
        Underwater hunter 16 July 2019 12: 14
        +4
        Quote: Andrey VOV
        Under the Constitution, the year 77, the bowels and so on (hereinafter referred to as the text) belonged to PEOPLE .... and what, a lot of the population of the USSR was raped by all this? And what is the result?

        We write all the laws for the benefit of a narrow group of people, so if there are changes, then it’s definitely not in favor of the population.
    4. kakvastam
      kakvastam 16 July 2019 13: 24
      -2
      Quote: Thrifty
      The new version of the Constitution should stipulate that the prime minister, like the president of the country, as well as the Supreme Council, as well as the State Duma, its members and members are elected and re-elected for a maximum of 2 terms of 5 FIVE years!

      The mantra about the need for periodic changeability regardless of the results of activity is a fantastic stupidity that ignores the very nature of management. It is not necessary to arrange an expensive leapfrog, but to establish the receipt of prompt and reliable feedback.
    5. WIKI
      WIKI 16 July 2019 16: 28
      +1
      Quote: Thrifty
      We are obliged to constitutionally secure the right of the private owner to use the natural resources of the country only as a tenant,

      But the private trader is still not the owner of the subsoil. The main thing here is how the state regulates the process of their use. What is wrong with private companies developing subsoil? They are much more effective than state-owned companies. So the state has more with them. But why then are they needed? These are political rather than economic projects. Therefore, their leaders and sit in their places for many years, with poor performance of their work.
  3. Rust
    Rust 16 July 2019 05: 39
    +2
    I hardly think of the German political system. People in the Kremlin are really not stupid, they will portray easier. BB tomatoes will not grow for sure. He will not come down from Olympus. And our people are really good. But with hard work and education is not very.
    1. The popuas
      The popuas 16 July 2019 08: 23
      +9
      Don’t speak for the people, for 18 rubles, of course, we don’t really agree to bend your back request and where they pay well, they work tirelessly hi
      1. Rust
        Rust 16 July 2019 11: 02
        0
        So I definitely don’t need to tell who works and where, it’s not working. I’m not sitting in the office myself. I earn 24 years with my hands and back in different regions.
        1. The popuas
          The popuas 16 July 2019 16: 33
          0
          Then why such ,, sayings ,, request
          1. Rust
            Rust 16 July 2019 18: 34
            -2
            To the fact that I see a lot of people serving time. To think a step forward of action, to be lazy. Most reason, pay little, I will not give all my best. I believe that first you need to show yourself, then raise the RFP. And two troubles, by the way, I think are not expensive and fools, but laziness and do not care (censorship speaking). General sticking into gadgets with jokes in the subject of education. My regards.
  4. Far B
    Far B 16 July 2019 05: 45
    +15
    Even if they reform the Constitution, what will change? Power put on her with the appliance. And the guarantor put it down. And they have demonstrated this more than once. So you can write anything in the "fundamental law". But to perform ... Again they will show round honest eyes on TV and "... the circumstances have changed, please show understanding, blah blah blah." It is not necessary to change the Constitution, oh, not the Constitution.
    If revenue falls in a brothel, you need not rearrange the beds, but change the girls (s).
    1. depressant
      depressant 16 July 2019 09: 36
      0
      And if it is elementary to clean up the "brothel"? Change the rules for using the area? It helped in other countries! Probably because the people showed exactingness to the conditions of their existence. And the fact that we have a "brothel" is completely within the framework of the current constitution. Let's change it! Russia will not survive another bloody mess.
      1. Far B
        Far B 16 July 2019 09: 42
        +6
        Russia without any total mess over the past 30 years has lost so many people that my mother does not grieve. Which is better - surgery or long and tedious therapy? debatable issue.
        1. depressant
          depressant 16 July 2019 10: 00
          -4
          Dalny, the operation has already passed. People even here, in VO, talked about the whole cemeteries of our youth, who died in the damned 90s. What about the Chechen wars? I do not want to lose our young! Enough is enough! The time has come for persistent, patient and competent therapy. As you put it, boring. And everyone needs to be involved in the process, within the boundaries of their capabilities.
          1. Far B
            Far B 16 July 2019 10: 06
            +5
            So they assure us that there was no operation, that there was just therapy? What we are going not revolutionary but evolutionary? We’ve been going on for 30 years, but for some reason we’re getting deeper and deeper. They lie, therefore? Then how to make sure that they do not lie about evolution-therapy? To change the Constitution - will not help until it is put on the device. What to do if therapy does not help? Or do they lie about therapy? sad
            1. depressant
              depressant 16 July 2019 10: 19
              -4
              Change the constitution as I suggested above. Competition between owners for means of production within the framework of the concepts of "effective and ineffective owners" will take on the harsh forms of total surveillance of producers on each other and will do most of the work for those who propose to enter the squares to confront the Russian Guard. If not all the work. As is the case in Germany.
              1. Far B
                Far B 16 July 2019 10: 22
                +7
                Once again - how will a change in the Constitution help when they put this very Constitution? Until you answer this question, all your other wishes will remain wishes. I, perhaps, also wish a lot of things laughing
                1. depressant
                  depressant 16 July 2019 13: 08
                  -2
                  Good. I will try to answer to the best of my abilities and capabilities.
                  Is that how it is in Germany?
                  There are a number of enterprises of the same profile. Each of them has its own tax inspector. Does this mean that there are as many tax inspectors as there are enterprises? No, there are a limited number of them, each of them oversees several industries. Visits, checks, corrects, advises, and where necessary, interferes - in general, watches. To the extent that without the sanction of the inspector and even his direct participation, and in many cases of direct replacement of the manufacturer by him, the tax in the bank cannot be paid. Imagine the responsibility of an inspector who puts his signature on a tax payment document. That is, two people are equally responsible for paying tax and keeping records under the law - a private manufacturer and a government official. If anything, both sit down. At the same time, the curator keeps the reporting documentation of enterprises for at least 10 years. As a family lawyer. This is the field for corruption, right? Nothing like this! Not only do the inspectors keep an eye on each other, so not only competing enterprises, but also all non-core neighbors, as well as citizens, keep an eye on each other - the law not only allows denunciation, but also encourages it. After all, a stain on a neighbor is a stain on everyone, a decline in reputation, total inspections that carry a loss of income, or even kick out of business someone whom an unscrupulous inspector "did not notice" for many years. It turns out that one pierced, and the entire German business lost its reputation. And he, the business, is very afraid of this because of international competition. Hence - the strictest surveillance of all of all. It is unprofitable for business to have an ineffective owner of the means of production in its ranks. But the government helps efficient business in every way it can, and in every possible way helps to increase the number of manufacturers. Did you get such a system right away? I don’t think so. But competition within the country and in the international market, the law and vigilant citizens have done their job. In this sense, the Russians are rather uncomfortable doing their business in Germany, they are suspected of dishonesty in advance, they are not helped. A car mechanic I knew from my life in the south started his own business in Germany, but in the end he closed it and returned - it's difficult! Although German is his native language, and he received German citizenship. Now it thrives in Krasnodar. And the Germans from Germany in our corrupt conditions - expanse. So it turns out that the pack of napkins that I bought the other day was made in China, and a joint venture with the Germans registered in St. Petersburg sold it to me. Not otherwise, some kind of fraudulent scheme that the German company could not implement in Germany, but in Russia - could.
                  1. Mazuta
                    Mazuta 18 July 2019 09: 08
                    0
                    Was it about the constitution? !!
              2. Revival
                Revival 16 July 2019 10: 43
                +3
                Who will change it against themselves, those who must change now and are ineffective owners, and are not going to become effective, but are going to remain owners.
                Elections? Re-election? There are no fools. If the election procedure will allow them to gradually be replaced, then it will be changed so as not to allow.
                So the therapy is most likely ...
              3. WIKI
                WIKI 16 July 2019 17: 07
                0
                Quote: depressant
                will take hard forms of total surveillance of manufacturers one after another and will do most of the work for those who offer to go out on the square to confront Rosguard

                Isn’t it easier to go to the polls and make sure that the constitutional amendments are not introduced by 2/3 of the votes of one party (EP), but as a result of consensus based on discussion between the parties. In this case, there is the option of amending the constitution, based on a referendum.
      2. New Year day
        New Year day 16 July 2019 10: 11
        +7
        Quote: depressant
        And if it is elementary to clean up the "brothel"?

        no need to move the bed, you need to replace the "girls"
        1. naidas
          naidas 16 July 2019 13: 17
          0
          "I (country) have no other writers (managers) for you!"
      3. WIKI
        WIKI 16 July 2019 16: 51
        +1
        Quote: depressant
        And the fact that we have a "brothel"

        We are not a brothel, but a controlled "chaos".
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 July 2019 06: 01
    +2
    Not only one thing: good governance
    It is hard to disagree with the author. To solve any stalled issue, everyone is trying to reach out to the president, and those who have to decide on their official duties often think about personal gain and do not care about the rest. The constitution written at EBN under the dictation of American curators certainly requires amendments.
    1. Revival
      Revival 16 July 2019 10: 50
      +2
      To change the constitution in favor of the people / state, paradoxical as it may seem, first you need to get the upper hand who wants these changes to the constitution.
      Otherwise, we put the cause ahead of the investigation.
      The people do not have a mechanism to amend the constitution bypassing the top for changing the top under the new constitution.
      1. depressant
        depressant 16 July 2019 20: 49
        0
        As a member of this forum, I can answer your words only the following.
        Above, Viktor Biryukov said that we have controlled chaos, not a brothel. But if the upper classes do not introduce constitutional amendments approved by the lower classes, they will receive both a brothel and uncontrollable chaos. For my part, I made proposals that excluded both, I did what I could, and then I wash my hands ...
        But for some reason it seems to me that uncontrollable chaos is needed by the top to carve up the country. Hence - 400 thousand national guardsmen as Putin's personal army, whole armies of guards from the oligarchs and repeated attempts to officially divide Russia into apparently previously agreed upon regions as future independent countries. And in order to secure the non-interference of foreigners in the carve-up, clumsy attempts are made to give them parts of our territories as bribes. Do you think it's nonsense? But since, obviously, I am not the only one who thinks so, and the further, the more people this nonsense will come to mind, I want to exclaim: "Tops! Stop driving the whole country crazy with your crazy actions!"
  6. Same lech
    Same lech 16 July 2019 06: 08
    +11
    Strongly against Volodin ... this speaker of the State Duma contributed to the adoption of many anti-people laws and I think that he is a lobbyist of the big capital of Russia and he doesn't give a damn about ordinary citizens.
    And so, of course, the GDP stayed at its post, began to bronze on its gallery ... if you look at the president’s activities from the height of history that way for 20 years ahead, he certainly is a positive person for Russia despite its minuses ... but everything comes to an end ... who will replace him? .... a dictator? an educator? a businessman? a drunkard? a traitor? an actor? ... all this has already happened in our history ... my brain is drowning in great incomprehensibility ... the main brain processor is warming .. Smokes can be said in an attempt to predict the future.
    As soon as the power is determined then we can talk about the main law of Russia.
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 16 July 2019 07: 37
      +9
      Once it was Dmitry Medvedev, and the experience can be considered successful. Volodin is clearly from a cohort of people who are not capable coups d'etat, so why not? Nominal position, nominal figure in this position ...

      Volodin is the brightest representative of ED, with all that it implies. But not a slug like a lady. The figure is strong, unprincipled, cynical, ready to go over the heads. If you need to put anyone in their place, let the minister at least from the government. The role of a nominal figure is in no way suitable. If suddenly an imperious advantage is on his side, then he will overturn Putin easily. He is not sorry, but personally I am against Volodin.
      1. depressant
        depressant 16 July 2019 09: 41
        +4
        I join for these reasons, and there is zero creativity. The "watchdog" of the existing order.
    2. AUL
      AUL 16 July 2019 10: 05
      +5
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      .who will succeed him? .... dictator? enlightener? businessman? drunkard? traitor? actor? ...
      ...
      As soon as the power is determined then we can talk about the main law of Russia.

      And why should the AUTHORITY be determined with this, and not the CITIZENS of the Russian Federation? Power - it’s clear how it will be determined!
    3. vic02
      vic02 16 July 2019 11: 25
      +3
      if you look at the activities of the president from the height of history that way for 20 years ahead
      Do you make the tablets of history here?
      certainly he is a positive person for Russia
      That is, the stagnation of the economy, the loss of production, the export of capital, the robbery of the people through pension reform, the profanation of elections for you are positive or, so to speak, insignificant minuses?
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 16 July 2019 15: 04
        -3
        You forgot to mention what kind of Russia he took from a drunkard ... everything else you listed is what I refer to its minuses.
        1. vic02
          vic02 17 July 2019 11: 12
          0
          He took Russia from a drunkard
          And he continued in the same spirit. Reforms of the electric power industry and Russian Railways according to Chubais, reform of the Moscow Region according to Serdyukov, the opening of free cross-border movement of capital, curtailment of social programs, and pension reform were carried out according to instructions from the West (IMF recommendations, etc.).
    4. spirit
      spirit 16 July 2019 13: 21
      -1
      The military junta ala Maduro will come hi
  7. Fedorov
    Fedorov 16 July 2019 06: 29
    -11
    Someone on the site completely read the constitution? I suppose not. And I think few of the Russians held this book in their hands. So that disputes are not appropriate, we will trust the authors who write the articles and their conscience hi
    1. Vladimir T
      Vladimir T 16 July 2019 06: 50
      +5
      We will not trust the authors of dubious opuses, but to read the constitution and laws. It is simpler and more reliable.
    2. Same lech
      Same lech 16 July 2019 06: 55
      +8
      And I think few of the Russians held this book in their hands.

      I have in the archive on the media ... from time to time I pull out, brush off the dust and compare sections of the Constitution with real life on the ground ...
      I read good wishes in the main law, in places I even shed tears of emotion ... you start to look at the summaries of political, economic, criminal, civil life in the localities, I start to curse with a selective obscenity ... do you understand the pattern gap ... how to translate virtual wishes into real life?
      1. Fedorov
        Fedorov 16 July 2019 07: 09
        +3
        Eh Lech ... if you were a deputy of the State Duma, you could give a deputy inquiry to the Constitutional Court - like "does not correspond, where is justice, and wait three months for an answer. So it remains to swear hi
      2. Andrey VOV
        Andrey VOV 16 July 2019 09: 02
        0
        And where is everything exactly according to the constitution, in which country ??
        1. Revival
          Revival 16 July 2019 11: 09
          +2
          And here no one builds "heaven on earth". People talk about being as close as possible.
          So your populist method of bringing it to the point of absurdity "where everything is exactly according to the constitution" is too clumsy and has not worked for a long time.
          1. Andrey VOV
            Andrey VOV 16 July 2019 11: 58
            0
            There is no populism, just it’s also not necessary to bring to the point of absurdity that, as soon as we begin to observe, everything will happen again and again .... You will remember how long our country lived having a constitution, in that very concept, and not codes of laws, conciliar code and so on ... and what basically was the attitude of the citizens of our country in general to the law ... is the question of enforcement mechanisms and acts that would be clear to everyone where it’s clear and clear, this is so, it’s possible and for that it will be so, but if it is otherwise, we will punish it inevitably
    3. Gardamir
      Gardamir 16 July 2019 08: 12
      +5
      Someone on the site completely read the constitution?
      I will reveal the great secret. There is such a thing called the Internet. You write the word "Constitution" there, and read to yourself, at least all your life.
    4. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 16 July 2019 09: 01
      0
      Apparently you dear did not study anywhere .... type in a search engine and read, since there are not many letters
    5. AUL
      AUL 16 July 2019 10: 09
      +2
      Quote: Fedorov
      Someone on the site completely read the constitution? I suppose not. And I think few of the Russians held this book in their hands. So disputes are not appropriate, we will trust the authors,

      And it's not destiny to get into the Internet and read it yourself? Or it's easier to trust different authors, like, "they don't write in vain!" (C)
  8. Bastinda
    Bastinda 16 July 2019 06: 30
    0
    Quote: Thrifty
    After that, a deputy or prime minister LIFE does not have the right

    Clinical death, or to whom it is pushed ...
  9. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 16 July 2019 06: 32
    +18
    Actually, the president already has a "title from the people": "Fabulous ..."! And what about the Elbasy? Nuuu ... if the Russian Federation is the "backbone" of Eurasia (as the government and the State Duma say ...), then maybe it will do! Then what happens? what "Fabulous Elbasy"? sad
  10. Amateur
    Amateur 16 July 2019 06: 37
    +9
    I wanted something: either the constitution, or the stellar sturgeon with horseradish, or to take and to rip someone off. To get a good jackpot - and to the side. And then, "looking at the time", either bite stew with horseradish, or dream about the constitution. Ah, take her dust, this constitution! No matter how you turn around it, it is not given as a treasure in your hands! It seems that a million of living stellate sturgeon is easier to eat than to get this thing! And what kind of constitution is this, and why did I suddenly want it - right, and I don’t know. Will there be a treasurer under this constitution? - flashed through my mind. If it will be - well, then, of course ..
    (the words belong to a certain liberal from M.E.Saltykov-Shchedrin, 1876.) fool
  11. Vladimir T
    Vladimir T 16 July 2019 06: 48
    -25
    Libera has seized upon the media. wassat And I am for Putin. If only it were not for the pseudo-liberals that they themselves are eager for power for their corruption. Now the landing has begun and corrupt officials and thieves. But here liberalists are again not happy. Trough past your nose? So who pokes at the trough of the snout, doesn’t they understand?
    1. Honest Citizen
      Honest Citizen 16 July 2019 06: 52
      +13
      So who pokes at the trough of the snout, doesn’t they understand?

      Is all EP in bulk on the bunk ????
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 16 July 2019 07: 49
      +19
      Quote: Vladimir T
      Libera seized upon the media. And I'm for Putin.

      I am shocked by the putreots, in words against liberalism, but they drown for the main liberal. The guarantor himself and his secretary have publicly confirmed this. And the entire government bloc, sheer liberals. Do the Zaputinians have special glasses in their eyes, that they don’t see this?
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 16 July 2019 08: 14
        +8
        special glasses
        rather special pockets.
        1. depressant
          depressant 16 July 2019 10: 32
          +1
          Yes, which managed to hire. There are so many of them before the election!
    3. New Year day
      New Year day 16 July 2019 10: 18
      +9
      Quote: Vladimir T
      Now the landing has begun and corrupt officials and thieves.

      So the world experience is, start with your inner circle, the benefit there are worthy people for prosecution rampant. DO NOT rub your eyes with small poodles.
    4. sunzhenets
      sunzhenets 16 July 2019 10: 42
      +5
      Quote: Vladimir T
      Trough past your nose? So who pokes at the trough of the snout, doesn’t they understand?

      This trough is only for our own, we have understood this for a long time. Dollar millionaires were prepared at the St. Petersburg sambo school, and governors are grown from bodyguards
    5. naidas
      naidas 16 July 2019 13: 26
      +4
      Quote: Vladimir T
      Now the landing has begun and corrupt officials and thieves.

      Yes, the fight against cockroaches, who lit up with a slipper, the rest is warm and fed.
  12. rocket757
    rocket757 16 July 2019 07: 06
    +4
    "TsAR" we need, good and everything, everything, everything, for everything in short!
    "Boyars bastards", "Tsar" is the head of everything .... that's just with the "head" we sho something wrong .... AND HOW ???
  13. A.K.
    A.K. 16 July 2019 07: 07
    +9
    Yes, it is not the constitution that needs to be changed, but the consciousness of people, education, behavior in society. And even if it is changed at least every day, people go to power in order to steal and appeal, and not in order to work for the benefit of people and the country as a whole. Society itself with a foul mind its priorities and values ​​are not the same.
  14. parusnik
    parusnik 16 July 2019 07: 12
    +13
    In any case, the ruling class will rewrite the Constitution for itself ...
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 16 July 2019 07: 53
      +4
      Initial correct .... RULING CLASS and FOR YOURSELF!
      And us ??? And we have a "bamboo" to smoke on the sidelines .... did not deserve more, because we do nothing ....
    2. AU Ivanov.
      AU Ivanov. 16 July 2019 08: 06
      +3
      Why rewrite it? It’s enough not to execute.
    3. WIKI
      WIKI 16 July 2019 17: 51
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      In any case, the ruling class will rewrite the Constitution for itself ...

      Now for today it is really so. But what prevents to change the situation after 2021? To take away from the EP the constitutional majority, and to bring to light its doubles of the Liberal Democratic Party and the right. Russia.
  15. steelmaker
    steelmaker 16 July 2019 07: 21
    +10
    Before you change anything, you need to give an objective answer to the 1993 constitution. Why were people shot from tanks? Call criminals criminals! According to constitutional reform, all parties and experts should objectively speak out. They indicated what interferes and what needs to be done. All this talk to keep Putin in power is all.
    1. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 16 July 2019 08: 43
      +1
      For a whole month parties and experts will objectively speak out on all channels and why it is urgent to change it
  16. samarin1969
    samarin1969 16 July 2019 07: 23
    +8
    There is no exceptional charisma. The circle of dignitaries is limited and any of them is a candidate for a public role. They will select / appoint without problems. And nothing will change except the portraits in the offices.

    Well, they can easily rewrite the Constitution. Like "reform". laughing

    Only the "external factor" can somehow change the policy in the Russian Federation. The system for the redistribution of benefits has been built. There are no people who have died of hunger on the streets. The system is happy with everything.
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 16 July 2019 10: 26
      +9
      Quote: samarin1969
      Only the "external factor" can somehow change the policy in the Russian Federation.

      104 years ago, an article by Vladimir Lenin “On the defeat of his government in the imperialist war” was published.
      "3. Hatred of their government and their bourgeoisie is the feeling of all class-conscious workers who, on the one hand, understand that war is a" continuation of the policy "of imperialism, and respond to it by" continuation "of their hatred of their class enemy, and with on the other hand, they understand that "war against war" is a vulgar phrase without revolution against one's government. You cannot incite hatred of your government and your bourgeoisie without wishing them defeat, and you cannot be an unhypocritical opponent of the "civil (= class) peace", without inciting hatred of your government and your bourgeoisie! "
      Remove the word "war" and everything is relevant now
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 16 July 2019 13: 20
        -5
        Quote: Silvestr
        104 years ago, an article by Vladimir Lenin “On the defeat of his government in the imperialist war” was published

        You did not indicate that this article was published in a newspaper that was published in Geneva, Ilyich deftly settled down - wandered around a Swiss cafe and composed foul articles, and for whose money? Kaiser? Zionists?
        1. AU Ivanov.
          AU Ivanov. 16 July 2019 14: 37
          0
          Yes, something bad happened. Stalin is in exile, at the Arctic Circle, where the wolves are afraid to spoil. Trotsky with Lenin in Switzerland. Bear in the North - Masha in the south.
          1. bober1982
            bober1982 16 July 2019 14: 43
            -2
            Quote: AS Ivanov.
            Bear in the North - Mashka in the South

            Bear - hit on the run from the north, and Mashka prepared a sealed car, it also turned out badly.
    2. WIKI
      WIKI 16 July 2019 18: 44
      +2
      Quote: samarin1969
      Only the "external factor" can somehow change the policy in the Russian Federation.

      To all the options, I would prefer a drop in oil prices to $ 30 a year by 2. And the people would be combed out so that the authorities could clean their brains.
      1. samarin1969
        samarin1969 16 July 2019 19: 07
        +2
        Quote: Victor Biryukov
        Quote: samarin1969
        Only the "external factor" can somehow change the policy in the Russian Federation.

        To all the options, I would prefer a drop in oil prices to $ 30 a year by 2. And the people would be combed out so that the authorities could clean their brains.

        Indeed, the fall in oil prices could become the "Russian Yellowstone". People will remember the assembly of the AK. But about the "brain cleaning" - I do not believe. And now they live and eat, as before the end of the world. Business jets will fly to the "promised lands" or they will blame everyone. soldier
        1. WIKI
          WIKI 16 July 2019 19: 15
          +4
          Quote: samarin1969
          or they will blame everyone.

          If, say, not 10 thousand, but a million come out in Moscow, it is unlikely that any of the rank and file dare to shoot, although it is possible that there will be an order from the top.
  17. Qwertyarion
    Qwertyarion 16 July 2019 07: 32
    +3
    But if history does not have to be rewritten and you have to live with it forever, then creating a normal constitution is more or less achievable.
    Therefore, any message about a possible constitutional reform I meet with timid hope. Maybe these guys will accidentally make a couple of good changes to our basic law?

    Do not even hope! They will do as they want, for themselves, and those who are awesome from innovations will be asked to treat with understanding ....
    1. SARANCHA1976
      SARANCHA1976 16 July 2019 08: 40
      +3
      Yes, they will raise the minimum wage with a pension of a thousand and everything is fine with the electorate
      1. Qwertyarion
        Qwertyarion 16 July 2019 09: 47
        +2
        Quote: SARANCHA1976
        Yes, they will raise the minimum wage with a pension of a thousand and all is well

        And the retirement age is another 5 years and everyone will be happy ....
        1. SARANCHA1976
          SARANCHA1976 16 July 2019 20: 18
          0
          Yeah and everybody to paradise
  18. Gardamir
    Gardamir 16 July 2019 08: 05
    +9
    I totally disagree. The Constitution, if it is observed to the letter, is quite normal. Only under the screams that she is abnormal, the constitution is constantly rewritten. Tell me where is the word in the Constitution "contract"? And there are a lot of such cases when the Constitution is interpreted as it is convenient for them. And then the Constitution is not the same. Wait, they will rewrite and there will be, well, if not the Elbasy, then some elder (they will find the word more modern).
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 16 July 2019 08: 21
      +4
      "The law is that drawbar" .... and the drawbar is not in our hands!
    2. GRIGORIY76
      GRIGORIY76 16 July 2019 11: 40
      +2
      Fuhrer or Duce, people do not care.
  19. SARANCHA1976
    SARANCHA1976 16 July 2019 08: 37
    +10
    So here is the thing. In the constitution! Oh, change faster, then we’ll live then. It’s like with the Ministry of Internal Affairs, we decided that the ghouls worked in the police, and let's rename the police that life will begin. And the people are the same ..
    1. AU Ivanov.
      AU Ivanov. 16 July 2019 09: 15
      -2
      And where will we get the others? People go to power in order to improve their financial situation. And the police and power structures are a section of society, they didn’t come from another planet. And our Constitution is normal, it’s another matter that the severity of Russian laws is compensated by the non-bindingness of their implementation.
      1. kuznec
        kuznec 16 July 2019 10: 26
        +8
        Quote: AS Ivanov.
        And the police and power structures are a section of society, they didn’t come from another planet.

        I disagree. In a healthy society, the screening of candidates for police positions (O Gods! And in Russia THIS was called the police! My grandfathers and grandmothers spat at the word "policeman"!) And the authorities are structured in such a way that the most worthy ones rise to the top - capable, honest, hardworking. Then it will be the true elite. With us, everything is exactly the opposite. Talented, honest, hardworking - the authorities are not needed. Although I assure you - they have not gone anywhere, they are.
        But the problem is that those units of percent of garbage that is present in every society are taken up. is an elementary sociology. And why? And by the principle of similarity - what kind of power, such and selection into power.
        1. AU Ivanov.
          AU Ivanov. 16 July 2019 10: 41
          -2
          Police - territorial military formations. Law enforcement agencies at all times and peoples were called "police" So that they renamed it correctly. Of course, they are honest. But, for the most part, they are honest, until they got to the position. A person works in an ordinary position - his own on the board, honest and hardworking. As soon as he sits down in a chair - shit, metamorphosis! Look down, noble manners and hands begin to rake. A couple of years ago, on one of the popular sites, there was an anonymous survey: will you steal, if such an opportunity presents itself. But 87% answered “yes”, “I don’t know” 6. And only 7% consider themselves honest. In short: if we bring up our children correctly, then our grandchildren, perhaps, will live in a society with an acceptable level of corruption. Well, or a dictatorship. It will be life-threatening to steal there. Although, who stopped it.
        2. WIKI
          WIKI 16 July 2019 18: 21
          +2
          Quote: kuznec
          Able, honest, hardworking - authorities are not needed.

          You are a little mistaken. Look at our propagandists on TV. Both capable and hardworking. But the trouble is, they have problems with non-replaceability. Climb all new, and new, as the devil from a snuffbox.
          They work without sparing their tongue and our brains.
          1. kuznec
            kuznec 17 July 2019 03: 04
            0
            You forgot the honest ones. And this changes your thesis, as a response to my comment.
            1. WIKI
              WIKI 17 July 2019 08: 48
              +1
              If you take an individual person, it is very rare to find a combination of all the qualities in one person. It turns out like in a joke: If you want to marry smart, handsome and rich, you have to marry three times.
              1. kuznec
                kuznec 17 July 2019 16: 18
                0
                This is all scholasticism. A key flaw in the system is the filter, which lets up exclusively villains. Take at least the journals you mentioned. And do not look for excuses in particulars.
  20. Million
    Million 16 July 2019 08: 38
    +6
    Until they die, nothing will change. Yes, and then likelihood is also high.
    1. bondrostov
      bondrostov 16 July 2019 09: 36
      +3
      Unfortunately, you are right when this will happen !? And How...
    2. Roman070280
      Roman070280 16 July 2019 10: 49
      +1
      "and no one helped them .. but he could" (c)
  21. Andrey VOV
    Andrey VOV 16 July 2019 08: 55
    -4
    It's true, what author is already starting to chase this caramel or gum, who loves more, about the upcoming elections in the 24th year, about the amendment of the Constitution ... not tired of it? Well, stupid, very similar to the replica of the hero of "Carnival Night":
    - "Is there life on Mars? Is there life on Mars? Science does not know this" ... and sheer blah blah blah ..
  22. Loess
    Loess 16 July 2019 09: 08
    +2
    It got ridiculous - even the president can remove from the post of minister or general
    And who is the minister’s boss?
  23. populist
    populist 16 July 2019 09: 39
    +2
    ... there is almost everything you need for a good life. We also have a hardworking, educated people, and a scientific and technological reserve, which will allow another twenty to thirty years to develop and grow. There is only one thing ...

    ― We have the means. We are not smart enough. Cat Matroskin wink fool
  24. Nestorych
    Nestorych 16 July 2019 09: 39
    +4
    Every nation lives as its constitution allows it to live.

    The people live as they allow the elite to rule! Moreover, our laws are "strong" by their failure to comply.))
    Putin will remain Putin or become "elbasy"

    laughing What enchanting verbiage, yes he is in the life of elbasy. And his only task was to go crazy for life.
    1. New Year day
      New Year day 16 July 2019 10: 20
      +4
      Quote: Nestorych
      What enchanting verbiage, yes he is in the life of elbasy. And his only task was to go crazy for life.

  25. evgic
    evgic 16 July 2019 09: 41
    -12
    Children's article, comments also at the level of middle school students
  26. Roman070280
    Roman070280 16 July 2019 10: 47
    +4
    Does the Kremlin understand that such a management model is flawed and simply dangerous for the future of the country?
    They do not care about the country from the bell tower ..

    In Russia, several scenarios of a transfer of power are being prepared at once, each of which involves the introduction of certain amendments to the current constitution.


    And the people will continue to ride on the ears, rubbing about democracy and elections ..

    Volodin is clearly from a cohort of people incapable of coups, so why not?

    Here I read all this .. I look at the photo .. I think - are people really so stupid that they will lead and vote for it ??
    And then I remember Medvedev .. and I won't be so surprised if in a few years "we choose" to replace Volodya Volodyevich - another Volodin ..

    PS .. and the article as a whole is very good ..
  27. mavrus
    mavrus 16 July 2019 10: 50
    +4
    Quote: AUL
    Quote: akunin
    collective farm named after rabindranath tagore

    The name of Lope de Vega ... But this does not change the essence.
    I read the article, and somehow it became sad. The people wonder what else they will come up with up there? What else will the master suit us? Will he put you completely with cancer or will he allow you to breathe a little? And then no one will ask us where the master tells - there the herd will wander, loving (according to the law) the power. And no one without sarcasm recalls the line of the constitution that "the power in the country belongs to the people" ...

    Quote: Monster_Fat
    Probably the best way would be to restore the monarchy with a new dynasty and a new Duma nobility .... everything is almost ready for this and the disenfranchised serfs-servants around, already, too, are full ..... yes

    Then not with the "Duma nobility" (the nobles still served the state at the very least), but with the "Duma boyars".
    Well, so that there was - "Boyar Duma".
  28. 3vs
    3vs 16 July 2019 11: 00
    +2
    "Maybe these guys will inadvertently make a couple of good changes to our basic law?"
    No, these definitely won't!
    Will make another requisition:

    "The law on voluntary home insurance against emergencies will start working in August. For 15 years, the authorities have repeatedly tried to push citizens to pay for risks in advance.
    On August 4, a law on voluntary housing insurance from emergency situations will enter into force. While it will work in seven pilot regions - St. Petersburg, Leningrad, Moscow, Sverdlovsk, Tver, Novosibirsk and Tyumen regions. The law itself does not introduce this service, but involves the development of appropriate programs at the level of entities.
    The exact price of the policy is still unknown.
    The association of insurers believes that insurance per square meter will cost about 3 rubles, the Ministry of Finance estimated it at an average of 1 rubles per year. There were also figures of 150 rubles a month. "

    Source:
    news.mail.ru/economics/37990349/?frommail=1
  29. Shuttle
    Shuttle 16 July 2019 11: 30
    +6
    Every nation lives as its constitution allows it to live.

    Wrong thesis. Not the constitution is a source of goodies and obstacles for the life of the people, but a socio-economic system.
    We dismantled with our own hands (we allowed our fellow tribesmen) to dismantle painted with hammer enamel, sometimes wooden and even rusty, bursting with steam and smoke, rattling and creaking starship for all. Dismantled in order to make a bunch of brand new nickel-plated, fast-moving and comfortable personal ones out of it. mersedesik. But it turned out that it’s impossible to make a Mercedes at all, even small and not very modern ones. More precisely goes, but not at all.
    It does not matter who exactly what personality ts is at the helm. It protects the interests not of the entire population of the country, not of its majority, but of those who ensure the existence of this power. It doesn’t matter what he thinks and thinks there. Power in the country belongs to the capitalists. Their interests are protected first of all. An elementary example. For capital, the third amnesty is already present, anti-crisis support, compensation for losses from foreign sanctions. For workers raising the retirement age. Oh, yes, yes - a little more increase in the subsistence minimum, and after the minimum wage.
    If, instead of the darkest one, be Medvedev, even Medvedchuk, even Khodorkovsky, even Patrice Lumumba himself, even Pinochet he would have to do the same thing because such is the socio-economic system. It is he who determines which laws in the country are valid, and which are not. Actually, it is him, i.e. the dictatorship of the ruling class determines which rules and agreements apply in the country at all.
    It is not the constitution that determines the system, but the system that determines the constitution. First comes the line, and the constitution follows him. And if the constitution does not follow the system, does not serve the interests of the ruling class above all others, then the ruling class ignores it in one way or another. For dictatorship (power not limited by anything) belongs to him, the class of the largest capitalists.
    So having accepted an erroneous thesis at the beginning, we can arrive at a correct result at the end only randomly, regardless of the orderliness of the arguments leading to the result.
    Therefore, the constitution can be polished, rubbed and even varnished and gold. But to change your life you need to change something else.
    1. evgic
      evgic 16 July 2019 16: 10
      +2
      The first meaningful comment on the article
    2. Dante Alighieri
      Dante Alighieri 18 July 2019 18: 51
      +1
      Dmitry, my deep respect for your comment. Indeed, most have forgotten about such conceptual things as a basis and a superstructure. But he was right, old Marx was right when he spoke about these two elements of society. Only the German philosopher, in my opinion, was a little mistaken with the proportion: not 90 to 10, but rather 70 to 30, or even 65 to 45.
      And I want to express special thanks for such a successful metaphor:
      With our own hands we dismantled (allowed our fellow tribesmen) to dismantle painted with hammer enamel, sometimes still wooden and even rusty, full of steam and smoke, a rattling and creaking starship for everyone. Dismantled in order to make him a bunch of brand new nickel-plated, fast and convenient personal Mercedes. But it turned out that to do Mercedes at all, even small and not very modern does not work. More precisely, but not at all.
      - Right, more precisely, you will not say!
      1. Shuttle
        Shuttle 19 July 2019 04: 08
        0
        Metaphor about a spaceship and Mercedes is not mine. She belongs to Elena Prudnikova. I listened to water from her videos on the channel of the security officer Comrade. Puchkova.
  30. Aliken
    Aliken 16 July 2019 11: 40
    +2
    It is not clear what changes the author wanted to see in the Constitution.
  31. BAI
    BAI 16 July 2019 12: 07
    +5
    can one give even more powers to at least regional parliaments as an experiment?

    Already given. The country was almost ruined. Our regions are formed on a national basis. This is a powder keg, to which everybody who wants to bring a wick is now and then.
  32. samarin1969
    samarin1969 16 July 2019 12: 18
    +3
    Quote: Silvestr
    You can’t incite hatred towards your government and your bourgeoisie without wanting to defeat them

    The fact of the matter is, dear Sylvester, that there are no YOURS among them. The powerful of this world have always been and will be dishonest, cruel and unprincipled - this is how the world works. Menshikov, Potemkin, Engelgarty, Arakcheev, Witte, and tsars with industrialists also stole and swam in luxury. But they built a lot, fought, expanded the state, were thinkers. None of them changed their homeland for mythical "universal values". But "our" "forbers" and "officials" simply cannot live without "abroad." The attitude towards Donbass is very indicative. It is not Maalyuli nuns or Yezidis who are being burned and terrorized there. ...
  33. kakvastam
    kakvastam 16 July 2019 12: 51
    +2
    Does the Kremlin understand that such a management model is flawed and simply dangerous for the future of the country?

    Unfortunately, the need for the illusion of control is indestructible, and the CEO, who distributes everything, including paper clips and toilet paper, is not so rare. It's all about the scale of the individual - a person prefers to deal with problems proportionate to him. And with this, our elite is in trouble ...
  34. Radikal
    Radikal 16 July 2019 12: 54
    +2
    Quote: Aerodrome
    Quote: Separ DNR
    Will Putin not turn into Leader of the Nation?
    Hmmm recourse...
    Considering he (Putin) created and brought to absolutism the system of "manual control" of the state

    rather, already brought to the point of absurdity ... brother-in-law, relatives, former bodyguards ...

    Moreover, the introduction (on a legislative basis) of the concept of "family business" is expected, so that soon "their" children, grandchildren, nephews, 7th water on jelly will legally own and inherit subsoil, land, and other "tasty nishtyaks "Russia to its relatives. sad
  35. Lieutenant Colonel of the USSR Air Force in stock
    +2
    My song, you fly through villages.
    Listen, steppes, akyn of Dzhambul!
    .....
    Sing, akyn, let the songs flow
    Sing about the Stalin Constitution!
    With a song, akyn, go to the gatherings,
    With a song about the brotherhood of great nations
    With a song about our blooming homeland,
    With a song, to work and victories calling!
    Warmed millions of hearts with care -
    Stalin - the wisest, beloved father!

    Nevermind what is written there has nothing to do with real life!
  36. Puzoter
    Puzoter 16 July 2019 14: 06
    +2
    In fact, open voting can solve the problem of power at all levels. Using a computer and the Internet, you can cast your vote for any candidate, and with the help of cryptotechnologies you are guaranteed to be protected from fraud. In addition, such a system is guaranteed to knock out the soil from Maidanuty and other Busoters and make it impossible to speculate. Indeed - all voices are in the public domain, everyone knows who people support, on what basis to go to the square? Well, cast your ballots for your candidate and there is no problem. In this case, the voting should be permanent - I do not like the president (the governor, the head of the village council, substitute the right one) - I take my vote from him and give it to another. When the other gains a critical mass of votes, and the current one loses it, the transfer of power takes place. At the same time, you can be president for life - the main thing is not to forget about the people.
    1. Aquilifer
      Aquilifer 16 July 2019 17: 13
      -1
      Open databases will give expanse to such lads:

      ... like this:

      ... and even so:

      Still, the principle of secret ballot was not taken from the floundering bay.
      But it would be useful to cancel voting on party lists. The deadline will come, and voters will specifically ask the deputy Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov: "What have you been doing for these n years?"
      And, of course, without a responsible approach on the part of the voters themselves, everything will be extremely sad.
      1. Puzoter
        Puzoter 16 July 2019 23: 41
        +1
        It is not necessary to display your last name. Purchases for bitcoins are carried out absolutely anonymously, but this does not negate the fact of transactions. Blockchain technology could revolutionize the electoral system and neither stormtroopers nor fanatics can do anything. And at the same time it would be the most honest and fair system. As for the influence on the minds of official propaganda to promote the "correct" candidates, it will also be meaningless because elections will be held permanently, in real time, and at the same time it will be immediately visible when the deeds of the candidates are at odds with their words.
    2. Shuttle
      Shuttle 16 July 2019 18: 25
      0
      Quote: puzoter
      In fact, the problem of power of all levels can be solved by open voting. With the help of a computer and the Internet, you can cast your vote for any candidate, and with the help of cryptotechnologies, you are guaranteed to be protected from fraud.

      Yes, not the problem that it is impossible to get rid of the pulses, emissions and other orgy in the elections. People really wanted the current president to win the presidency. There is no doubt about it. But why did they want it? Because a little less than all the brass rights of this country work on the corresponding task. Do you understand?
      All general elections are elections at the expense of the population of that representative of the ruling class, who in the next cadence will defend the interests of the ruling class.
      Here in Argentina was an example with Allende. He just went a jot against capital and had to die. And then what? Argentines for a long time to vote simply banned. Once and banned. Everything.
      The point is not in the CEC, not in the counting system. The case is in power. In the system of power. Peacefully power from class to class is not transferred. Neither reactionary to progressive (1917) nor progressive reactionary (1991-1993). Ce la vie.
  37. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 16 July 2019 15: 04
    +2
    It can be seen that the author is not indifferent to the fate (future) of our country, especially since there is already a sad experience of destructive and even treacherous management. I think that keeping the "Institute of the Wise Men" in the power structures in the form of a Security Council, which would be formed from former presidents, is not a bad idea, but on the contrary - a kind of Politburo. If you determine the competence of the Security Council members to solve certain strategic issues and topics, and most importantly control over the president, then it is possible to exclude the factor of subjectivity and voluntarism in decisions. Something like that.
    1. Servisinzhener
      Servisinzhener 17 July 2019 11: 07
      0
      a kind of Politburo
      Only in a rethought form, because the kind that was in the USSR did not prevent the collapse. Although if you think about it, everything depends on the personal qualities of members of the Politburo. The fact that in 1991 it did not include a person like Brezhnev in 1964.
  38. Sunstorm
    Sunstorm 16 July 2019 16: 09
    +3
    Inadvertently they can =) Therefore, let's not scare them off) otherwise they will hear enough and how ..... they will do it "on the right"
  39. Aquilifer
    Aquilifer 16 July 2019 16: 18
    0
    Putin, concrete and collective, will be forced to maintain his authority among the masses - with populist measures, self-glorification against the backdrop of a new diplomatic crisis and, possibly, some visible liberalization and "deverticalization" of the political system.
    I think the atmosphere in the country will be extremely musty at first, but the Juche will gradually fade away due to the departure from the dogma of infallibility. Maybe in years ... twenty years we will observe the Duma confrontation with the current coalition, not only non-systemic, but practically absent, and the next one " Russia. "Generations are changing, and this is the main and most interesting thing that has been happening in our country for the last three quarters of a century.
  40. Private89
    Private89 16 July 2019 18: 50
    +1
    The ruling class in the country is the capitalists, the means of production in their hands, so any laws no matter how correct they are on paper will ultimately serve their interests.

    "Right is the will of the economically ruling class raised into law ..." (K. Marx)


    To think that the capitalist will take care of his worker or the people as a whole is the height of naivety. The capitalist will always betray, always sell, because the main thing for him is to make a profit by exploiting the labor force. As long as people tolerate or hope that the authorities change their minds and begin to serve their people or a conditional Lenin (General, Holy Tsar, Savior, effective manager, good Capitalist) comes and corrects everything, changes are extremely unlikely. The class consciousness of most people (proletarians) is asleep and it is necessary to work so that it wakes up, then people will start to struggle not only for their economic rights, but also for the proletarians to be the ruling class in the country, namely this is a guarantee that the state, its laws, its power will serve the interests of the majority. So if you understand that the capitalist is exploiting you, make sure that your neighbor understands this as well as your work colleague, etc. and then the quantity will go into quality.
  41. Lieutenant Colonel of the USSR Air Force in stock
    0
    Vladislav Surkov: Putin's long state

    About what is going on here.

    Putin’s big political machine is only gaining momentum and tune in for a long, difficult and interesting job. Its full capacity is far ahead, so that in many years Russia will still be Putin’s state, just as modern France still calls itself the Fifth Republic of de Gaulle, Turkey (despite the fact that the authorities there are now anti-Semalists) still relies on Atatürk’s Six Arrows ideology, and the United States is still turning to the images and values ​​of the semi-legendary “founding fathers”.

    It is necessary to realize, comprehend and describe Putin's system of rule and, in general, the whole complex of ideas and dimensions of Putinism as the ideology of the future. It is the future, since the real Putin is hardly a Putinist, just as, for example, Marx is not a Marxist and not the fact that he would agree to be if he knew what it was. But this must be done for all who are not Putin, but would like to be like him. For the possibility of broadcasting his methods and approaches in the coming times.

    Thus, four main models of the state are known to Russian history, which can conditionally be called by the names of their creators: the state of Ivan the Third (Grand Duchy / Kingdom of Moscow and all of Russia, XV – XVII centuries); State of Peter the Great (Russian Empire, XVIII – XIX centuries); Lenin State (Soviet Union, XX century); Putin state (Russian Federation, XXI century). Created by people, expressed in Gumilev’s “long will”, these large political machines, replacing each other, being repaired and adapted on the move, provided the Russian world a stubborn upward movement.

    Статья полностью http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2019-02-11/5_7503_surkov.html
  42. Den717
    Den717 16 July 2019 21: 25
    0
    And if the question of amending the Yeltsin constitution is raised, it is only in connection with the future (and many expected) “transfer” of power.

    Well, damn it, another oracle !!! And what, there are no other problems in the constitution? Or is it just not visible to you?
    Putin will propose to the post of his successor just a weak, non-initiative, passive figure, in principle not capable of any independent steps. Once it was Dmitry Medvedev, and the experience can be considered successful. Volodin is clearly from a cohort of people incapable of coups, so why not?

    If you, except for non-binding phrases, could confirm your statements about someone's "lack of independence" and "inability". You do not really know any of them and have no idea about their abilities. Maybe you are a secret member of the "high council" and you know these persons for common work? For sure, an article of the Criminal Code about lying in the media would be very useful ...
    It is assumed that a peculiar hybrid of the Soviet and German political systems can be taken as the basis

    Or for starters, to acquaint people with the source of such news? And then .... again hit the dream constructions ..
    And so I would like to see in the country a normal, strong parliamentarism, a responsible government, effective, but correct siloviki! And if it’s very scary to immediately give power to our parliamentarians, can you, as an experiment, be given a little more authority at least to regional parliaments? And there, taking into account the results obtained, it would be possible to gradually extend this experience to the whole country.

    Remember also about the era of mercy .... You them, these "effective, but correct", "responsible" and "strong" where you get them. Will you go yourself? Lead? Are you ready to be criminally liable for failure to fulfill your election promises and revoke your powers at any time? That's just the point. We are all concerned about the country and justice, until we put it to the real "lever". And in real matters, the bulk of the "guardians" who are ready to teach the presidents how to govern the country have not even advanced to the foremen. With rare exceptions, they do not participate in disputes on such topics. They understand that ... there is no point in spoiling their nervous system .... And, I think, by doing so they show their wisdom.
  43. NF68
    NF68 16 July 2019 21: 40
    +1
    Putin is still much more modest.
  44. Servisinzhener
    Servisinzhener 17 July 2019 10: 10
    +1
    For the work done to the author +. But still I do not agree with him. Here at this point:
    Of course, to many this promise will seem controversial: well, they will give power to parliament, so what? But just imagine: the government is not sitting for many years, showing a zero result, and after a year or two of such work gets a kick in the ass and goes to unload the cars. Corruption, which has long become one of the main problems of the country, is beginning to shrink, because it is easy to “buy” one official or prosecutor, but try “financially interested” three or four hundred deputies competing for the right and continue to occupy a warm place in the State Duma .
    An example of one neighboring country that has already snapped up, where the parliament approves ministers, does not confirm your conclusions. This example is very revealing, because the people are the same. Whatever the pot-and-panheads say.
    The main risk that the current constitution carries with such broad powers of the president is that if the president becomes like Gorbachev, then it will be extremely difficult to stop him.
    But the parliamentary form also has a minus. When the political force that the president represents does not have a majority, and there is another political force that either has a majority or can easily gain it. Which will torpedo any decision that the president wants to make and completely block his work. Regardless of whether such behavior will harm the country. An example of the United States and closer Moldova. And Ukraine, too, has not gone far when the foreign minister does what he thinks, and the president cannot take it off. at the moment he does not have a majority in parliament.
  45. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim 17 July 2019 18: 11
    0
    Quote: depressant
    I propose to introduce the following points into the Constitution:

    There is a tool for your offer!
    Make out, subscribe !!!
    https://www.roi.ru/

  46. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim 17 July 2019 18: 14
    +1
    Quote: depressant
    To prevent Russia's slipping into the bad monarchy of 1914, I propose to introduce the following points into the Constitution:

    1. land, mineral resources and other natural riches of Russia cannot be private property, while the land is leased by the state for one or another period for efficient operation (housing, industrial production, agriculture);

    2. the mining industry and the first redistribution cannot belong to a private person;

    3. The owner of the means of production is obliged to be effective, and those who:

    a) does not use them in the interests of the common good (takes income abroad above the permissible norm);
    b) does not produce goods necessary for society (low quality of goods, palm oil as an example, etc.);
    c) does not provide citizens of his country with jobs (hires migrant workers in excess of the quota, or pays low salaries, does not provide safety measures, etc. - that is, provides a worker with something that cannot be recognized as a workplace that meets the accepted standards) ;
    d) does not comply with environmental requirements (smoke, discharge into waste water bodies, etc.);
    e) there is a corruption component in the activity.

    Items can be added.

    issue support:


    https://www.roi.ru/
    1. depressant
      depressant 18 July 2019 13: 52
      +1
      Comrade Kim!
      If you contact me, then I don’t go to other sites, I live in one house - IN. As for the suggestions made in my post, they are not at all original, in one form or another they periodically flash in the Internet space. Therefore, take it as your own.
      And I would add one more requirement:
      Recognize small and medium-sized enterprises as local industrial production.
      This will mean that their localization is mandatory at the place of actual location, while the tax is paid to the local budget. And not like now. Legal address in Moscow, production in Yekaterinburg, tax goes to Moscow. In this case, local authorities with their eternally deficit budgets will do their utmost to promote the flourishing of small and medium-sized businesses on their territory. By the way, this is the norm of Stalinist socialism. The same one that in the shortest possible time after the Second World War helped to raise the country, provide 12% of the gross product growth, and then lower prices. Only under Stalin, small and medium-sized enterprises were called cooperatives, and farmers were called individual farmers.
  47. andrei2911
    andrei2911 18 July 2019 16: 55
    +1
    Quote: Boris55
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    ABOUT! "Boris" (stress on the first syllable) was noted ...

    As I understand it, yours from those ones that scored 3.5% (statistical error) up to the heap? laughing



    You can joke over Putin for as long as you want, but the people, even after all the anti-people’s laws adopted by the Duma (which does not go beyond the current Constitution), are still on Putin’s side.

    Only after a change in the social system is it possible to radically change the Constitution. Pulling a sheep’s skin on a wolf does not make sense.

    How to change the social system without revolution - see:
    - restructuring No.1 - NEP;
    - restructuring No.2 - thaw;
    - restructuring No. 3 - restructuring.

    Who told you nonsense about "people for Putin"? Now you won't hear a good word from people about him. I myself voted for him with a fool in 2018. I believed ... Now I understand how wrong I was. The country is on the verge of rebellion, and you are nonsense about "people on Putin's side" are sculpting ...
    1. depressant
      depressant 18 July 2019 17: 44
      +1
      I have to admit, Andrey, that you are right. Decreasing prices were again returned to the high May level, and for meat - higher. The shopping carts are sparingly filled again. The friendliness of the people somehow suddenly and immediately gave way to frowning and concern, but attributing this about the weather does not work. The recent scandal in the midst of a credit middle class, which had to be observed from my balcony, ended with curses against the authorities and left a heavy impression. I used to watch 112 by Ren, now it's impossible. A continuous stream of petty thefts, savage fights, inconceivable murders ... Discontent is boiling so far in the lower layer. And no one believes that the recent high-profile arrests are a targeted policy to eradicate corruption. Just at the top there is a struggle for power, visible to the population only implicitly, in such indirect manifestations.
  48. Oleg133
    Oleg133 18 July 2019 23: 08
    0
    What does Putin want, the patriot of the Russian Federation timidly asks? About the people and what he wants, not even a word. Democracy
  49. M. Michelson
    M. Michelson 19 July 2019 04: 50
    0
    As long as the current Constitution, nurtured on the blood of patriots, is preserved, all these "Elbasy" will only be a child's rat game.
  50. kig
    kig 20 July 2019 05: 17
    0
    And what exactly is wrong with the constitution? It would be nice if the author covered in more detail the points that arouse his suspicion.