The militants again tried to attack the Russian Hmeimim air base

74
Militants of terrorist organizations in Syria have resumed attacks on the Russian Khmeimim base. Another attack attempt with drones happened on the night of July 12. This was announced at a briefing by the head of the Russian Center for the Reconciliation of Warring Parties in Syria, Major General Alexei Bakin.

The militants again tried to attack the Russian Hmeimim air base




According to Bakin, another attempt to attack the Russian base Khmeimim occurred on the night of 12 in July of this year. From the territory of the Idlib de-escalation zone, three UAVs were launched towards the base, which, at a safe distance from the territory of the air base, were detected by air defense systems and destroyed. There are no material and material damage at the base itself, the air base functions normally.

Three Russian UAVs launched by terrorists from the Idlib zone were destroyed in a timely manner by Russian air defense weapons on duty and at a safe distance from the airbase

- said the general.

As previously reported, the militants do not stop trying to strike at the Russian air base, periodically launching drones in its direction and striking from MLRS installations. The air defense forces and means of the base successfully cope with threats, shooting down missiles and drones on the fly. The bulk of the strikes are delivered from the territory of the Idlib de-escalation zone, where the remnants of terrorists have taken refuge.

Recall that protection from air attacks in the near zone of the air defense of the Khmeimim airbase is carried out by the Pantsyr air defense missile system and the Tor-M2 air defense system, and the far zone is covered by the C-400 air defense system.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    13 July 2019 09: 37
    It looks like the "homemade products" were launched again.
    1. TTX
      0
      13 July 2019 09: 49
      Israel of Russians squeezes out of the zone of their interests!
      igil it was their womb, and Russia gouged them ..)))) So much money was lost.
      On the outskirts, won 5 billion, everyone arranged and now there is sponsorship
      We will definitely wet and wait for the F-35 link ... The main goal !!!!
      1. +8
        13 July 2019 11: 07
        It’s complete nonsense. Shelling and raids by drones comes from the zone of proturethan groups. We don’t answer there. The situation is like in a joke: mice cried, but continued to eat cacti. Here we are shooting down three hundred dollar drones with tens or even hundreds of thousands of missiles killed raccoons. What the hell is the target? The Turks in Syria, as well as the citizens of the Gear breed as they want and everything is just fine, Hurray comrades?
        1. 0
          13 July 2019 12: 29
          Air Defense Forces successfully Cope with threats by shooting down missiles and drones on approach. Most of the strikes are carried out from the territory of the Idlib zone

          Someday, success can end if Idlib is not stripped. Strange situation. Well, we can’t hide the Syrians from American and Israeli raids ... But it’s a shame not to defend our base! To defend not defending and repulsing attacks, but striking the aspen nest, and stripping to the end the terrorists who themselves were brought there for some reason.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. 0
                13 July 2019 16: 42
                Stas, it’s also not clear to me-working out in combat conditions of front-line air defense doesn’t call the language — how enchantingly expensive it turns out, don’t you?
                1. 0
                  14 July 2019 06: 32
                  Quote: zadorin1974
                  Stas, it’s also not clear to me-working out in combat conditions of front-line air defense doesn’t call the language — how enchantingly expensive it turns out, don’t you?

                  Well, of course, it’s expensive to shoot down cheap drones with cheap rockets, to carry additional radars by the Ruslans and to keep the air defense in constant combat readiness. The same constant voltage (for Moscow), when the base is constantly under attack. And most importantly, the problem itself (Idlib) cannot be solved in any way and it seems that they are not even planning to solve it. There are voices saying Idlib is Erdogan’s area of ​​responsibility, it’s his fault. Well, so what? The problem is with us and not with Erdogan.
            2. 0
              13 July 2019 16: 38
              Kotu. Stas expressed his opinion. But without going into details, you tried to insult a colleague on the site, calling him a spokesman, distinguishing yourself. In this case, what are we going to here? Just discuss the present, moreover, with your thoughts. We are all here sofa analysts, like it or not. Rude is not necessary! About subtle, agletsky humor will not work.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. 0
                  13 July 2019 17: 21
                  I’m the same reader of the site as you are. If you have old scores, write in a personal account. I don’t call names about sofa analysts, I state the fact that we all don’t do politics, we communicate. Actually TALK ON KITCHEN OR ON THE SOFA WITH OUR COLLEAGUES (otherwise why is everything here?) Doesn’t like it? No one canceled the flag and drum)))) I don’t teach anyone, I expressed my opinion.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            13 July 2019 20: 37
            Funny you. To solve this problem, ground forces are needed. They are not here. That is, there are people in military uniform of the SAR, but no troops.
      2. -7
        13 July 2019 11: 08
        F35 will not even go into the air defense coverage area, so don’t dream hard, and especially our Israeli aircraft will not attack.
      3. +4
        13 July 2019 14: 05
        Quote: ttx
        Israel of Russians squeezes out of the zone of their interests!
        igil it was their womb, and Russia gouged them ..)))) So much money was lost.
        On the outskirts, won 5 billion, everyone arranged and now there is sponsorship
        We will definitely wet and wait for the F-35 link ... The main goal !!!!

        An interesting logic is that the Turks shot down our plane. The Turks arm the Babakhs, fight against the Kurds, although it was the Kurds who soaked ISIS and still do not know what to do with thousands of ISIS prisoners, and where are the ISIS prisoners from the Turks? No them
    2. 0
      13 July 2019 10: 17
      In my opinion, this is a routine. What is the news about - that our work is very successful? We are in the know.
      1. +5
        13 July 2019 10: 58
        Yes, not news and routine .. But the barmalei are still trying to find vulnerabilities in the air defense base.
        Alexey (Siberia 75) calls for an otvetka, this is quite fair, but in my opinion, the main thing is to, despite the routine, hone the defense parameters so that they can’t find vulnerabilities. hi Complacency is our long-standing enemy.
      2. 0
        13 July 2019 10: 58
        Now it may be a routine, but just a few years ago, imagine that Russia hit rockets in a foreign land? Clave to the opinion of world obschechestva? Therefore, we follow and support! Everything was very close- weak Russia, impoverished Russia ,,,
    3. +15
      13 July 2019 10: 23
      The fact that terrorists are attacking the Russian base is a regular situation. But it is necessary that after each such attempt, the next message was about our successful retaliatory strike. And there was a list of destroyed militants and their weapons.
      As he said, in my opinion, DU Puchkov "Rocket and bomb strikes are actively agitating fanatics, to renounce their idiotic beliefs"
  2. +12
    13 July 2019 09: 38
    When will our gadyushnik be cleaned up already?
    1. -1
      13 July 2019 09: 42
      Quote: Pivot
      When will our gadyushnik be cleaned up already?

      When the "sponsored" channels will be closed.
      But it is impossible to do it alone.
      In Afghanistan, 10 years cleared ...
    2. 0
      13 July 2019 09: 56
      When the issue is resolved with the Idlib gadyushnikom. And it is unlikely. It is necessary to expand the security zone. It’s one thing to launch a drone, another thing MLRS.
      1. 0
        13 July 2019 10: 29
        Quote: 210ox
        When the issue is resolved with the Idlib gadyushnikom. And it is unlikely. It is necessary to expand the security zone. It’s one thing to launch a drone, another thing MLRS.

        Well, in fact, recently, militants are trying to expand their territory, and in the direction of Khmeimim too. Assad simply has no one to fight, the country is bled. Rather, the situation will gradually deteriorate further. Well, about the "Idlib ax" for Assad and the trap for the Russian Federation, I have already written more than once. hi
      2. +2
        13 July 2019 10: 52
        It seems to me very much that Russian troops should not engage in cleansing foreign territories, let alone incur losses during these operations: the territory of Syria - that’s Assad and clean it!
    3. +4
      13 July 2019 10: 44
      Well there are 2 obstacles:
      1) Turkish stream, nuclear power plants, tomatoes, hot tours to Turkish hotels. In general, if you go into Idlib strongly, Erdogan will be offended and his reaction is unpredictable.

      2) Nothing. Well, they chose the offensive site in May. Even somehow agreed with Turkish partners. AND? As a result of the offensive +/- nothing. Kafr-Nabul was recaptured, but in fact it is under the threat of constant attacks + it doesn’t go on the offensive, for the 56 highway was blocked by the Baha’s counter-attack and it hasn’t been 1,5 for a month now how to knock them off the highway. Coming without a highway is not enough logistics. At the same time, the women are actively beating under the base of Kafr Nabula with the threat of cutting off the village.

      The last battles for Hamamiyat are just about that. Yes, the Baboons managed to be overturned the next day - due to the fact that the VKS reacted very actively and bombed the main column of the Baboons. But if it had come out like on the Highway - when they also intended to return it the next day, but now they are returning 1,5 months, then the threat would already be at Kernaz.

      Here is a video from Blokhin about this with the layout:

      Prior to that, in Latakia, the Chechen raid had overslept (literally) (the White Mosque was mainly PR there). They cut off several sleeping blocks, for let the Russians put out patrols, signal mines on the approaches and, in general, Allah forbids to put night sentries.
    4. 0
      13 July 2019 12: 19
      Turks will not allow this to be done. One gets the feeling that now Turkey orders music there and not Russia, despite the C 400, the nuclear power plant, and the southern stream. Can all the same hint to them about the Kurds?
  3. 0
    13 July 2019 09: 48
    Why isn't Idlib still in ruins? Are they kept peaceful or by American instructors?
    1. -2
      13 July 2019 09: 51
      Quote: Motivatornick
      Why isn't Idlib still in ruins? Are they kept peaceful or by American instructors?

      Yes, probably there, in place, in Syria, you know better than from here
      1. +3
        13 July 2019 10: 25
        so you can comment on any news in.
        1. -6
          13 July 2019 10: 40
          Someone prevents you from expressing your "thoughts"? Or is it impossible to pass by? But if you are so sighted, say it from the sofa.
          I see you present all the time original ideas.
          Ehspirt straight.
          Rewarding
          1. +3
            13 July 2019 10: 50
            I have not seen such nonsense. You need to be treated.
            1. -7
              13 July 2019 10: 55
              Something above the couch, I don’t see the diploma of a diagnostician.
              And take care of your eyesight, come in handy
    2. +6
      13 July 2019 09: 59
      Quote: Motivatornick
      Why isn't Idlib still in ruins?

      Under the agreement, Idlib is a de-escalation zone. You cannot violate the agreement.
      1. 0
        13 July 2019 13: 58
        Quote: Piramidon
        Under the agreement, Idlib is a de-escalation zone. You cannot violate the agreement.

        What are you saying? belay
        And according to the constitution, Syria is a sovereign state, and Bashar al-Assad is a legitimate president ... belay
        Where to turn efforts to whom to entrust?
        There are tactics for conducting combined arms operations and, excuse me hi To set up de-escalation zones by agreement with someone means that the other party is obliged to observe ... if not, then ... if some dare, they will receive an answer ...
        So, reluctantly, with the use of the latest weapons, the policy is continued by other means! If this is not observed, then there is no need to puff up in vain. There are a number of tried and tested security features. By the way ... I have never seen a fish whose scales have grown after cleaning ...
        1. -1
          13 July 2019 20: 41
          You are talking about the integrity and sovereignty of Trump and tell Erdogan. And then, I'm afraid they are not in the know.
  4. +3
    13 July 2019 09: 50
    I do not understand why they are not taking measures against the Idlib zone. Well, well, we agreed with the Turks on the preservation of the viper, apparently, for some reason the Turks need it - a compromise, so to speak, but it is obvious to everyone that de-escalation does not occur there, and if there is no de-escalation - why not hit the viper with all its might, so that the resources attacked us dried up - and the hunt was gone. This is strange to me.
    1. +2
      13 July 2019 11: 00
      So, in fact, we are in Idlib and we are doing what we have been doing - we are bombing the reconnoitered targets on a quiet basis, and launching our PM to clean it up is both our possible losses, possible graters with the Turks (that we beat their allies), and confrontations with the Americans, supplying the idlib group from total annihilation - in general, we maintain a dynamic balance of forces ... laughing
  5. +3
    13 July 2019 10: 00
    launched by terrorists from the Idlib zone
    This zone is like a chiri on the neck and if I am not mistaken, the zone of responsibility of Turkey. Therefore, claims can be safely addressed to the Turks for their inaction regarding ISIS.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +5
      13 July 2019 10: 49
      Quote: rotmistr60
      launched by terrorists from the Idlib zone
      This zone is like a chiri on the neck and if I am not mistaken, the zone of responsibility of Turkey. Therefore, claims can be safely addressed to the Turks for their inaction regarding ISIS.

      Of course, claims can be safely addressed. Yes, that's just the Turks, they boldly put on these claims. In the open supplying weapons to Idlib groups, as well as helping with artillery fire. And they are not used to half measures, they can remind of their interests in another way, it's me about the downing of our plane. And if anyone thinks I sympathize with the Turks, then so fool. It’s just that I remind you what trap the Russian Federation got into. Turkey and other local players have many more opportunities there. It’s like we had an opportunity with Crimea and Donbas - a common land border, with a common people on opposite sides of the ribbon (I'm talking about the mood of the inhabitants), through which you can quickly transfer anything you want and in any available quantities. Plus the most acute challenges to state interests. For which, the same Turks are ready and will fight. Are we ready to fight the Turks (and its allies will quickly catch up)?
      And I will refer to the discussion: I. Strelkov, V. Kvachkov, K. Sivkov, M. Kalashnikov: what to do? (part 3)
      I will not upload the video, so that there would be no complaints from admins. Hammer the selected text in the search engine. An analysis of the Syrian possible perspective from 2 min. 40 sec (and better look in full). hi
    3. 0
      13 July 2019 11: 04
      One gets the feeling that the Turks are preserving this grouping from destruction in order to grab this whole piece in their favor, so that the Kurds do not smell ...
  6. +4
    13 July 2019 10: 10
    Well done, they repelled the attack with dignity. Now it remains to destroy their viper.
  7. +3
    13 July 2019 10: 12
    Guys! Hold on! You are fighting for Russia there !!
    1. +7
      13 July 2019 10: 30
      Quote: serg.shishkov2015
      Guys! Hold on! You are fighting for Russia there !!

      Right. Ensuring the security of military bases is not comparable to ensuring security from bandits from any region of Russia. We remember Volgodonsk, Dubrovka, Nord-Ost, Beslan ...
      Turkey is playing its own policy, realizing that if it does not intercede for the militants, they will be "rolled" across the deserts, after which the Turkish presence in Idlib will be ended.
      1. -3
        13 July 2019 10: 41
        Quote: Terenin
        after which the Turkish presence in Idlib will end.

        And in Syria itself
      2. +1
        13 July 2019 14: 06
        Quote: Terenin
        We remember Volgodonsk, Dubrovka, Nord-Ost, Beslan ...

        If you remember, a tragedy happened at the performance of the musical "Nod-Ost" at the Dubrovka theater.
        Therefore, we remember Volgodonsk (the explosion of residential buildings), Dubrovka (Nord-Ost), Beslan (hostage-taking in the school) ... hi
  8. +1
    13 July 2019 10: 27
    On self-made drones, our anti-aircraft defense systems are well trained (the Shell is already upgraded and new missiles are made, they are cheap to intercept drones), but there are no experience with serious targets like the KR, stealth, etc. And such a passive reaction to attacks causes bewilderment, every time they have to plow everything by aircraft in response to these attacks
    1. +3
      13 July 2019 10: 56
      Quote: _Ugene_
      On self-made drones, our anti-aircraft defense systems are well trained (the Shell is already upgraded and new missiles are made, they are cheap to intercept drones), but there are no experience with serious targets like the KR, stealth, etc. And such a passive reaction to attacks causes bewilderment, every time they have to plow everything by aircraft in response to these attacks

      Of course they train well, only expensive. Anti-aircraft missiles against a cheap drone or hail rocket is not the kind of exchange that you can do for years. hi
      1. -1
        13 July 2019 11: 37
        what's the difference at the missile test site to spend on training targets or here? but without training, it’s of little use, so all the rules, only very monotonous goals, it’s bad
        1. +3
          13 July 2019 12: 04
          Quote: _Ugene_
          what's the difference at the missile test site to spend on training targets or here? but without training, it’s of little use, so all the rules, only very monotonous goals, it’s bad

          Yes, the difference is that several missiles are spent on the training ground, but here there is a massive consumption during attacks. And they deliver them there, through the "distant lands". Therefore, such training is expensive. And at the heart of any war is the economy (however, you know this without me). But for the forces opposing the Russian Federation, on the contrary, such an exchange is economically very profitable. You've probably heard the expression - a war of attrition, this also implies economic, incl. Therefore, it is not possible to move the security zone away from Khmeimim and vice versa, so the militants are trying in every possible way to move it in order to have the possibility of constant shelling. We don't seem to have any direct losses from this (at least they don't sound it), like what is the point of attacking, but the economic sense is precisely what the militants are pursuing. And if there is a massive shelling, then there is always the likelihood of losing expensive aircraft. And there were already photos of the aircraft burned at the airfield (unless of course there was a fake). So, expensive trainings are obtained and the risks are too great, with such "training". At the exercises, there are no such risks, to lose several units of equipment in addition to the personnel, therefore, it is training or training that is used.
          So, being under real shelling and exercises is not at all the same thing. hi

          PS Three things are needed for war: money, money, and again money.
          1. -1
            13 July 2019 15: 33
            have you beguiled something, what kind of expense, what kind of war? we have such a miserable contingent there that in the scale of costs for our entire army there is a penny
        2. 0
          13 July 2019 14: 16
          Quote: _Ugene_
          what's the difference spend missiles at training ground for training targets or here?

          Yes, exactly the same as that exists between constant combat readiness and combat-firing exercises.
          Our guys showed that popping is fraught - it pleases. But the command should have a plan (not to smoke, but to guide to action) to provide preventive measures for those who want to let drones, especially in Turkey, there is experience (albeit not quite to terrorists, but similar in their ugly essence):

          You can try ... Yes ... stop Chan must be with pork shit ... feel
  9. +1
    13 July 2019 10: 28
    Most of the strikes are carried out from the territory of the Idlib de-escalation zone, where the remains of terrorists took refuge.

    And why not deliver punched blows in response?
    1. +1
      13 July 2019 11: 07
      Yes, in return, it’s possible, only who will conduct reconnaissance - after all, it’s not the children who oppose us either?
    2. +3
      13 July 2019 11: 11
      Point strikes where? There is 3 of Luxembourg or 3,5 of Mauritius in area. And apply constantly. Useless then?

      Here's an example KafrZita disengage.



      Here is the latanma




      Here is your precision - even ran back not far. Watch first. Then they make a traditional picture for the media.


      Here is Zita again - 2 days ago.


      And here is Latanma 2 weeks ago.



      But the bombing cannot be solved there, only with legs ... And there are problems with this, because the infantry is still weak and runs away from any sneeze.
      1. -1
        13 July 2019 12: 02
        Quote: donavi49
        But the bombing there can not be solved, only legs.

        Yes there and "legs" can not be solved. You can't put up a checkpoint at every house. (striped in Iraq tried)
        But VKS missile attacks are sobering. And the most stubborn are sent immediately to the guria.
        Then, of course, restore peace through diplomatic methods
  10. -2
    13 July 2019 10: 51
    What about our reconnaissance drones? I hope they are in the air around the clock, tracking militants trying to attack our military base? ??
    1. +2
      13 July 2019 12: 21
      Quote: Thrifty
      I hope they’re in the air around the clock, tracking militants,

      The militants are cunning, they do not always wear banners with the words "I am a terrorist".
  11. +5
    13 July 2019 10: 52
    This is ad infinitum and should be taken for granted, the conflict has two components, military-political and social. Yigil is a battering ram for reformatting the Middle East, this is its military-political component, there are a lot of stakeholders from the global financial system, to international terrorism and who uses and where their interests converge, and where they gladly turn their heads to each other no matter. And social, this is a heightened sense of justice embedded in Islam itself, radical Islam will always find its adherents among the humiliated and offended, as communism found them at the time, because that the dream of social justice always exists.
    1. +1
      13 July 2019 12: 16
      One of the most sensible comments on the site in terms of assessing the overall situation in Syria.
  12. -3
    13 July 2019 11: 02
    that is, there are serious problems with intelligence in the Russian troops in Syria? Not the first time already. You can somehow prevent shelling.
    1. +3
      13 July 2019 11: 58
      How? They are collected somewhere in Idlib (or generally in the Turkish Allepo) - then they are either transported ready-made or in a large-disassembly to some thread Jisr-Sugur or Kafranbel. They collect, check, and throw them on Toyota in Al-Gaba or a Babakh piece of Latakia. From where they make launches.



      The packages of the Bulgarian City come either from Gaba or from Latamini's pocket (this is Hama). In Gab they tried to advance in May - they cleaned the valley, they did not overpower the mountain range. As a result, they all returned back to the broads. In Lataminier - only the Baboons are now advancing, they are holding a piece of the 56 highway dead there - without which all the logistics of the initial May attack break.

      To prevent launches of shock and UAV kamikaze - you can only pushing the positions of the broads from the air base (or the air base from the broads) + reliable operational work. Because it is possible to transport UAV pieces to the controlled territory, to collect there in a shed and launch from the nearest hill.

      You can counter Toyota Grads only if you have constant patrolling with shock UAVs of launch squares. For Toyota will dump and get lost before any aircraft has time to fly into the air, Even if there is a reconnaissance UAV and fixes the moment of launch.

  13. -3
    13 July 2019 11: 12
    Why not gouging this Idlib? Turkish stream and C 400 interfere? Nothing prevents the Turks from attacking us almost directly. God-chosen ones are possible, Turks are possible, Amers are possible, not an army and a great country but some terils!
    1. 0
      13 July 2019 11: 58
      There, the Turks are tickled from time to time, the east is a delicate matter

  14. -7
    13 July 2019 11: 21
    I wonder how many aircraft have already been damaged there? What material damage? Secret? And are the Generals there in their place? Why does the military guard fail to cope with the task? What does the valiant military police do there? Checks documents from pilots and technicians directly on the take-off field?
    1. +3
      13 July 2019 12: 27
      Commentators on VO do not like such questions. And just such issues should be discussed first.
  15. 0
    13 July 2019 13: 20
    Ay bullies! Do not shawl ... soldier
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. -1
    13 July 2019 13: 32
    Quote: donavi49
    Well there are 2 obstacles:
    1) Turkish stream, nuclear power plants, tomatoes, hot tours to Turkish hotels. In general, if you go into Idlib strongly, Erdogan will be offended and his reaction is unpredictable.

    Russia does not respond with fire to launch sites, not because you fantastically fantasized, but because it keeps and respects its word - this is a de-escalation zone, with which we agreed. It seems that you, having learned the Russian language and lived in Russia for a long time, did not understand these same “Russians.”
    1. +2
      13 July 2019 15: 09
      And is the attack on the Khmeimim base from the de-escalation territory part of the treaty? Maybe you need to learn from Israel, which expresses less concern and destroys goals that it considers dangerous? And another question, but what is the territory of Syria is not taken into account?
  18. 0
    13 July 2019 15: 10
    Quote: Lipchanin
    Quote: Pivot
    When will our gadyushnik be cleaned up already?

    When the "sponsored" channels will be closed.
    But it is impossible to do it alone.
    In Afghanistan, 10 years cleared ...

    hi So sponsors, this is the whole world. In advance, Turkey hints that Russia needs to give gifts (or write off loans for Turkey) sad
  19. -1
    13 July 2019 18: 35
    It is time to plow the Syrian territory to the very border with the Turks and populate normal people with appropriate military support.
  20. -1
    13 July 2019 19: 13
    Quote: mihai_md2003
    And is the attack on the Khmeimim base from the de-escalation territory part of the treaty?

    No, however, this is a violation of the militants, this is their provocation. Russia is far from a country that will follow such simple and miserable provocations. If the militants take actions that can be regarded as an attack on the base, they will be cleaned up. This has already happened.

    Maybe you need to learn from Israel, which expresses less concern and destroys goals that it considers dangerous?

    Not necessary. You need to live with your own mind, act in your own conscience.
    Moreover, Israel is legally in an unresolved conflict with Syria. Is it worth learning such actions on such grounds, the question is, to put it mildly, open.

    And another question, but what is the territory of Syria is not taken into account?

    It is on this basis that, at the invitation of the legitimate authorities of Syria, our troops are located and operating there, taking into account a number of agreements. It should be understood that this is not the level of yard disassembly under the shaf, this is a special operation abroad against the backdrop of complex geopolitics. Actions should be clear, verified and thought out several moves forward.
    1. +1
      13 July 2019 19: 52
      Quote: Mentat
      No, however, this is a violation of the militants, this is their provocation. Russia is far from a country that will follow such simple and miserable provocations. If the militants take actions that can be regarded as an attack on the base, they will be cleaned up. This has already happened.

      The militants are under the full protection of Turkey, so I do not make a big difference between them. If they act contrary to the interests of Turkey, then the Turks should pull them. I can’t recall any examples of such jerking.
      Quote: Mentat
      Not necessary. You need to live with your own mind, act in your own conscience.
      Moreover, Israel is legally in an unresolved conflict with Syria. Is it worth learning such actions on such grounds, the question is, to put it mildly, open.

      Exactly the same as Syria is in an unsettled position with Israel, and if Russia takes the Syrian position, it would be harder to hint to Israel about the inadmissibility of the bombing of Syrian territory. Let Israel already express concern a couple of times, so to speak, for a balance of interests in the region.
      Quote: Mentat
      Special operation abroad amid complex geopolitics

      The special operation abroad certainly had and has its goals. So far, we see that Syria is divided into at least 3 parts. The oil regions were taken by the Americans north of Turki. Israel bomb everything it wants and when it wants. Not like winning !!!
  21. 0
    13 July 2019 22: 38
    When at least they will reveal the sources and enter them on the fifth
  22. 0
    13 July 2019 23: 04
    Quote: mihai_md2003
    Quote: Mentat
    No, however, this is a violation of the militants, this is their provocation. Russia is far from a country that will follow such simple and miserable provocations. If the militants take actions that can be regarded as an attack on the base, they will be cleaned up. This has already happened.

    The militants are under the full protection of Turkey, so I do not make a big difference between them.

    Possess all the completeness of the information, maybe it should be more modest to make statements?
    Who cares what you do or don’t do there? Judging by what you write, Russian is not your native language. Abroad?

    If they act contrary to the interests of Turkey, then the Turks should pull them. I can’t recall any examples of such jerking.

    There everyone acts in their own interests, including Russia. Undoubtedly, to a tremendous degree helping Syria, while practically preserving its statehood in general.

    Quote: Mentat
    Not necessary. You need to live with your own mind, act in your own conscience.
    Moreover, Israel is legally in an unresolved conflict with Syria. Is it worth learning such actions on such grounds, the question is, to put it mildly, open.

    Exactly the same as Syria is in an unsettled position with Israel, and if Russia takes the Syrian position, it would be harder to hint to Israel about the inadmissibility of the bombing of Syrian territory. Let Israel already express concern a couple of times, so to speak, for a balance of interests in the region.

    Your capabilities or horizons are apparently not enough to understand that Syria and Israel are in a slightly different position. If not for the intervention of Russia, the state of Syria would cease to exist at all.

    Quote: Mentat
    Special operation abroad amid complex geopolitics

    The special operation abroad certainly had and has its goals. So far, we see that Syria is divided into at least 3 parts. The oil regions were taken by the Americans north of Turki. Israel bomb everything it wants and when it wants. Not like winning !!!

    Nobody has captured anything yet. There is a systematic decrease in the intensity of the armed conflict and the strengthening of Syrian state stability. It was declared victory over ISIS, which was the main goal of Russia in Syria, and this is so. This education is no longer wealthy. The plans of ISIS, I recall, was the capture of part of Russian territory.
  23. +1
    14 July 2019 02: 24
    Quote: Mentat
    Possess all the completeness of the information, maybe it should be more modest to make statements? Who cares what you do or don’t do there? Judging by what you write, Russian is not your native language. Abroad?

    I know that this is not polite, but I have a counter question. Tell me, does my location or degree of knowledge of the Russian language somehow relate to the topic under discussion? Or is it some kind of psychological device on your part? Can only a Russian, and even better a Muscovite with a residence permit strictly inside the garden ring, express their opinion?
  24. 0
    14 July 2019 08: 06
    Quote: mihai_md2003
    Quote: Mentat
    Possess all the completeness of the information, maybe it should be more modest to make statements? Who cares what you do or don’t do there? Judging by what you write, Russian is not your native language. Abroad?

    I know that this is not polite, but I have a counter question. Tell me, does my location or degree of knowledge of the Russian language somehow relate to the topic under discussion? Or is it some kind of psychological device on your part? Can only a Russian, and even better a Muscovite with a residence permit strictly inside the garden ring, express their opinion?

    Nobody forbids you to express your opinion, as you see. You do it wonderful. However, if you are outside of Russia and are not its citizen, it’s not worthwhile to teach what to do or not to do to her and her people, the leadership, command of the armed forces, and with the tinge of an attempt to provoke readers.

    Moreover, this is pointless; we have a completely different society and people. There are enough sensible, intelligent, talented people at all levels, including and in this forum, to separate, figuratively speaking, the seeds from the chaff.
  25. 0
    14 July 2019 08: 51
    Quote: 210ox
    When the issue is resolved with the Idlib gadyushnikom. And it is unlikely. It is necessary to expand the security zone. It’s one thing to launch a drone, another thing MLRS.

    It was necessary to leave from there, and it was not necessary to come there. Russian cities are shelled, and here you are freeing everything to free
  26. -1
    14 July 2019 12: 57
    Quote: Mentat
    Moreover, this is pointless; we have a completely different society and people. There are enough sensible, intelligent, talented people at all levels, including and in this forum, to separate, figuratively speaking, the seeds from the chaff.

    A very dangerous train of thought. You still write about the exclusivity of the nation and superiority over all others. This approach allows you to rely not on logic and justice in decision-making, but on the exclusivity of your opinions. A direct path to misunderstanding between nations and international conflicts.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"