The project I-Dome SAM (Israel). "Iron dome" on wheels

30
There are several types of missile defense systems in service with Israel, and new models may appear in the foreseeable future. The main novelty of recent times in this area is the project I-Dome. He proposes the transfer of funds from the Kipat Barzel stationary complex to a self-propelled chassis and the expansion of the range of tasks to be solved. The resulting combat vehicle is designed to accompany the troops or the rapid organization of air defense and missile defense of a given area.





Exhibition sample


The first missile defense system "Kipat Barzel" / Iron Dome / "Iron Dome" took over on duty in 2011, and since then such equipment regularly participates in repelling missile attacks. In the future, the company-developer Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. engaged in the development of the project and the adaptation of the complex to use for various purposes. For example, several years ago, a draft version of the ship's “Iron Dome” air defense system was presented, and now the land mobile version is also offered.

For the first time, the project of the mobile complex I-Dome was told last year during the Eurosatory 2018 exhibition. The company-developer revealed the basic data on the new project, and also pointed out its advantages. Experienced equipment is not yet available, and only graphic materials and models appear on the exhibitions. The timing of the appearance of a complete sample remains unknown.

Technical features


In the original version of the system, the Iron Dome includes several different tools on stationary platforms, which makes it difficult to transport and deploy. The new project I-Dome provides for some changes in the composition of the complex and the transfer of its main components to a self-propelled chassis with suitable characteristics.

I-Dome promotional materials feature a triaxial foreign-made special chassis. It has a platform with mounts for the necessary devices and tools. A self-propelled combat vehicle carries a radar station, communications and control systems, as well as a launcher with interceptor missiles. Some of the funds of such a complex are directly borrowed from the stationary “Dome”, while others are being developed anew.

Above the cab and the engine compartment of the base chassis is a raised platform with a telescopic mast for the radar antenna device. The latter is made in the form of a pyramid with four active phased antenna arrays, providing a circular view. In the working position, the antennas are raised, which increases the detection range. The type and characteristics of the radar was not specified. Probably, it should provide target detection at ranges of at least 70 km - comparable to the parameters of an interceptor missile.

Apparently, the shooting controls and other electronic components are undergoing some changes related to the proposed methods of combat work. Radar and SLA must accompany a large number of targets and control the launch of missiles. It is required to provide independent work and actions as part of a developed integrated air defense-missile defense.

A lifting launcher with 10 transport and launch containers for Tamir missiles is placed on the landing gear of the chassis. No special revision of the interceptor missiles is envisaged. It is planned to use the same missiles as on the stationary complex, including those that have been upgraded. This provides for the expansion of combat capabilities.

At the moment, the Tamir serial anti-missiles are intended only to combat unguided rockets of various types. An improved rocket is also being developed, capable of hitting aerodynamic targets like aircraft, helicopters and UAVs. After the appearance of such a modification of the missile defense system, the Kipat Barzel complex in a stationary or mobile version will be able to expand the range of tasks to be solved. In fact, the new missile defense system will make it a universal air defense system.

Complex I-Dome will not get the opportunity to fire on the go. Before use weapons the car will have to stop and get ready to start. The required procedures are said to take no more than a few minutes. The air defense system will be able to just as quickly return to the traveling position and continue to move.

An anti-aircraft system of this kind is proposed for solving two main problems. She will have to protect stationary objects, quickly going to a given position and performing deployment. In addition, I-Dome will be able to replenish military air defense and ensure the protection of troops on the march or in positions. In both cases, the use of universal missiles should provide high performance and fighting qualities.

Weapon of the future?



A promising air defense and missile defense system I-Dome exists only in the form of documentation and promotional materials. As far as we know, a full-fledged prototype has not yet been built or tested. His appearance is a matter of the future. Nevertheless, even on the basis of the available materials one can consider the proposed sample and draw preliminary conclusions.

The project I-Dome SAM (Israel). "Iron dome" on wheels


In the I-Dome project, first of all, the very fact of transferring funds from the Kipat Barzel stationary complex to a self-propelled chassis is interesting. On one machine, it was possible to place all the fixed assets, although at the price of this was a certain reduction in tactical and technical characteristics. A machine of this architecture can quickly go to a given area and begin combat work. Also provided escort troops.

In the proposed form, I-Dome is able to protect troops or areas from air strikes. In addition, there remains the opportunity to work on unguided rockets - a characteristic threat to Israel. Thus, the new development of Rafael can be considered as a typical modern air defense system, assembled from the available components.

However, there are also reasons for criticism, some of which are directly related to the transfer of components to a mobile platform. Obviously, the on-board radar in its parameters is lagging behind the larger and more powerful, used in the composition of the Iron Dome. In addition, the ammunition of one launcher is reduced by half. The impossibility of firing on the move, due to the design of the launcher, imposes restrictions on combat use and its effectiveness.

Some questions are caused by the stated possibility of intercepting aerodynamic targets. Work on the modernization of Tamir missiles, aimed at obtaining such functions, has been going on for several years, but has not yet reached the adoption of improved missiles. The lack of progress on the anti-aircraft missile limits the potential of the complex. If the tasks of updating the missiles are not solved, then I-Dome will become not a universal air defense system, but a specialized anti-missile system, even if it is in a mobile version.

Apparently, the complex I-Dome has a commercial potential. Such a system may be of interest to both the Israeli army and the military of other states. The international market of air defense and missile defense is large enough, and any new model has a chance to become the subject of a contract. The presence of certain positive qualities increases the likelihood of receiving an order.

As a competitive advantage I-Dome can be considered basic combat capabilities. In addition, the results of the operation of the Iron Dome systems with Tamir missiles are a good advertisement for this air defense system. During operation, stationary complexes attacked more than 2 thous. Rockets, shells and mines, intercepting 90% targets. The proposed modernization provides for the preservation of anti-missile potential during the development of the fight against aircraft. All this may interest the buyer.

However, while the project I-Dome is in its earliest stages and is not yet ready for mass production and supply of equipment to customers. In the past and this year, the company-developer showed only advertising materials and equipment mock-ups, but not full-fledged prototypes. The progress of the last year is unclear, which is why the real prospects of the project remain questionable. It is obvious that Israel offers an interesting version of the universal short-range air defense system, but its future has not yet been determined.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    12 July 2019 07: 01
    There are practically no questions, mobility will give a good plus. I wanted to ask if there would be enough radar capabilities and communications for integration into a single air defense / missile defense structure, but then I looked at the world map and cooled down. To work in isolation from a single air defense / missile defense system, you need to try very hard. A radar is needed for the middle / near zone, and communication to the nearest node is not a problem at all due to the geography, specifics and possible threats of the local theater.
    1. -1
      12 July 2019 08: 16
      Shoot down some ammunition over infrastructure, human life .... a bad idea !!! anyway, the damage is huge ... i.e. among other things, the range must be increased !!! and these are such costs and technical tricks, wow!
      And so, mobility is a plus, especially if the ability to connect to the system, network is preserved!
      1. -1
        12 July 2019 08: 45
        Quote: rocket757
        Shoot down some ammunition over infrastructure, human life .... bad idea

        For this, mobility is needed in order to quickly and quickly advance to the probable direction of the strike and intercept BEFORE there is a threat to the protected object (from fragments, unexploded warheads, etc.). In this case, the stationary complex near the protected object remains to intercept the slipped percent and insures the quick response group.
        1. -1
          12 July 2019 09: 26
          Quote: g1washntwn
          For this, mobility is needed so that on time

          Have you actually had anything to do with anti-aircraft matters? because the question / explanation .... naive or something!
          The SPECIALIST over the painted picture is only FAST !!! HA, HA, HA!
          1. -3
            12 July 2019 09: 43
            Have you actually had anything to do with anti-aircraft matters? because the question / explanation .... naive or something!

            Well, the Russians in the air defense are too far ahead. Many things to other countries will be simply incomprehensible, even at the level of specialists.
            Therefore, judging is strictly not recommended)))
            1. -1
              12 July 2019 10: 16
              Quote: lucul
              Therefore, judging is strictly not recommended.

              It's just LOGIC, I guess this is available to everyone. In addition, now you can simulate everything on your computer whatever you want .... if you enter the correct input, the result will always be the SAME!
            2. -1
              12 July 2019 19: 23
              From whom the gap, in what? In advertising on our television.
          2. -1
            12 July 2019 19: 34
            Your opponent is right in the context of Israel. From Tel Aviv, 250 km to any border. Therefore, in the context of Israel, the strengthening of the stationary air defense grouping due to mobile launchers is relevant
            1. 0
              12 July 2019 19: 46
              Mobile air defense either accompanies the object of protection in readiness 0, or work effectively against the achressor, which attacks the SCHEDULE! Otherwise, they DON'T MAKE ANYWHERE, incl. due to the small radius of missile destruction.
              This is not a claim, it is experience and a statement of facts.
              It is very expensive to effectively defend ..... it is not effective to defend itself, you will have to pay twice, thrice .........
              1. -1
                12 July 2019 19: 54
                You know, I respect your experience. But in the context of Israel, everything is a little different. They do not fire a thousand missiles in one salvo. There shelling can last for weeks. And this complex will advance in the right direction and will be there in an hour or two, supporting the stationary complexes, or will arrive to protect the non-covered stationary air defense zones. And an increase in range is an increase in price and multiple. Hezbalons and Hamazes boasted that they had 10 thousand missiles. Most of which are primitive and only a few are branded Iranian designs. Air defense should not choke, cover its facilities and not ruin Israel. So they spin as they can.
                1. 0
                  12 July 2019 20: 50
                  Everything is clear, but one of the obvious ways to reduce the cost of missiles, complex, is to sell for export! There is serious COMPETITION in this segment!
                  I don’t teach Jews to trade, I just argue.
                  I do not teach them to build their defensive systems, but there are nuances that, it seems to me, have not been worked out to the end ... precisely because of the costs, when the gain in efficiency and savings are not immediately obvious!
                  Again, without criticizing the mobile complex itself, what is the quality of Israeli technology, I know, even with an unbiased opinion, the advantages over complex systems of other manufacturers are not so obvious!
                  Then why fence the garden ???
                  1. -1
                    12 July 2019 21: 05
                    I understand it as a mobile component of the iron dome. Missiles, guidance systems - mastered and tested
                    1. 0
                      12 July 2019 21: 46
                      Suppose that I just don’t know everything I need, I make an assumption about .... maybe that’s why I can’t get my heels to the nose .... I can’t determine the obvious advantages of the mobile complex over other methods. Pennies do not converge, like that.
      2. -2
        12 July 2019 09: 27
        Quote: rocket757
        Shoot down some ammunition over infrastructure, human life .... a bad idea !!!

        to allow some ammunition to explode on the same objects is a bad "idea" by an order of magnitude.
        1. 0
          12 July 2019 10: 23
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          to allow some ammunition to explode on the same objects is a bad "idea" by an order of magnitude.

          No question, this is understandable. But why not choose from two BAD results ... THIRD, quite accessible and feasible, if you set the goal to keep your important just WHOLE, and repel the attack until when the consequences of this process are not at all good!
          Increase the range .... otherwise the savings will come sideways!
          Yes, Israeli technology has its own troubles dictated by the narrowness of the tasks performed in their specific circumstances !!! Go beyond this framework .........
          1. -2
            12 July 2019 10: 53
            Quote: rocket757
            Increase the range .... otherwise the savings will come sideways!

            you think with your geographic scales.
            in Israel, the distance between the enemy launcher and the target is sometimes 4-5 kilometers.
            1. 0
              12 July 2019 11: 00
              Israeli technology has its troubles

              and about it too
              Quote: Maki Avellievich
              the distance between the enemy launcher and the target is sometimes 4-5 kilometers

              BUT, I consider the topic more broadly, that is, about the export potential of the product. Although it will not be superfluous for you to modify the product .... however, yourself, yourself, yourself with a mustache.
  2. 0
    12 July 2019 10: 25
    In short, HA, HA, beautiful pictures ... also draw cartoons, things will go!
  3. +1
    12 July 2019 11: 12
    At the moment, the Tamir serial anti-missiles are intended only to combat unguided rockets of various types. An improved rocket is also being developed, capable of hitting aerodynamic targets like aircraft, helicopters and UAVs. After the appearance of such a modification of the missile defense system, the Kipat Barzel complex in a stationary or mobile version will be able to expand the range of tasks to be solved. In fact, the new missile defense system will make it a universal air defense system.

    The author is mistaken. Tanir is designed to intercept airplanes and drones in the zone of its action.
  4. +1
    12 July 2019 16: 47
    Quote: rocket757
    No question, this is understandable. But why not choose from two BAD results ... THIRD, quite accessible and feasible, if you set the goal to keep your important just WHOLE, and repel the attack until when the consequences of this process are not at all good!
    Increase the range .... otherwise the savings will come sideways!
    Yes, Israeli technology has its own troubles dictated by the narrowness of the tasks performed in their specific circumstances !!! Go beyond this framework .........

    I think that the third option will not work due to the specifics of the theater. The size of Israel is such that if you use the third option, you have to shoot down over the territory of other countries

    Quote: rocket757
    In short, HA, HA, beautiful pictures ... also draw cartoons, things will go!

    Alas, Victor, but after cartoons in March 2018, talking about cartoons from others is somehow not particularly logical
    1. 0
      12 July 2019 17: 35
      Good evening soldier
      Quote: Old26
      Alas, Victor, but after cartoons in March 2018, talking about cartoons from others is somehow not particularly logical

      EVERYONE is sinning about cartoons! these are now the rules of the "game", that is, business and politics! I personally disgust, but we are not asked about that.
      Quote: Old26
      due to the specifics of the theater.

      This is understandable, they have already pointed out to me that I am guided by other scales. But, the product is probably for sale, so sho long-range missiles will not be amiss.
      They themselves missiles with such performance characteristics are most in demand. A working, quite effective system ... I do not criticize it, just pointed out some absurdities in the statements, that’s all.
  5. -2
    12 July 2019 19: 58
    Quote: Ken71
    From Tel Aviv, 250 km to any border.


    That's it.
    Despite this geographical feature, the Israeli government managed to do so in the 20th century. take a fuck with all the neighbors, all that remains is how to train the entire population, how to react in critical situations and rely on various air defense systems.
    Until all the requirements of the well-known UN Resolution are fulfilled, and not only those relating to the rights of Israel, it is necessary to improve air defense systems and keep IP-1 under their pillows.
  6. Quote: Comrade Kim
    Unread

    ***
    Comrade KIM! Israel will implement UN resolutions immediately after you *.
    When will you start implementing the S. Korea Resolutions:
    UN Security Council Resolution 1718.
    UN Security Council Resolution 1874
    UN Security Council Resolution 2087
    UN Security Council Resolution 2094 etc etc?
    Do you urge everyone to implement the UN Resolutions?
    Russia too?
    By the way, to quarrel with neighbors ... firstly, not with everyone, secondly, Israel is not alone in this ...
    1. 0
      12 July 2019 22: 17
      Only our neighbors are afraid to shell us.
      1. Of the shooting enemies of Israel, there are only those who, for humanitarian reasons, have not been destroyed: not a single STATE of Israel even shells: neither Egypt, nor Jordan, nor Lebanon, nor Syria, nor even Iran.
        The bombardments of Hamas and Hezbollah are not neighbors, but certain organizations, such as Chechen organizations, which in some countries, including Muslim ones, are recognized as banned, and in others - fighters for certain ideas.
  7. 0
    13 July 2019 01: 31
    Quote: Lieutenant Colonel of the USSRF Air Force in reserve
    not a single STATE of Israel shells:

    You can argue with your assumption.
    The site stubbornly blocks the response text, so you have to upload a screenshot:


    1. What strange borscht set of quotes did you provide?
      Yes, not a single state, in general, directly shells Israel. Except for some rare incidents with a corresponding reaction from Israel. Only Syria, Iran, and the PA can be considered direct opponents, and they usually use third non-governmental forces.
      With the rest of Israel’s neighbors (Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates, SA, etc.), relations are now more or less normal.
      In general, Israel has a visa-free visa with 161 countries, and Russia with 119 countries. Well, and who is more isolated?
      Resolution 3379 was canceled by UN General Assembly Resolution 4686, the majority voted for it: 111 states, 25 against, 1 abstained. Among the "for" the initiator is the USSR and the "friends of the USSR", who hesitate along with the line of the USSR, and by the USA line,
      And links to opinions that do not coincide with the views of the initiating countries (Australia, Austria, Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bulgaria, Bolivia, Brazil, Burundi, Great Britain, Hungary, Venezuela, Gambia Guyana, Guatemala, Germany, Honduras, Grenada, Greece, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Zaire, Zambia, Israel, Iceland, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Canada, Cyprus, Colombia, Costa Rica, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania, Liechtenstein Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Mozambique, Mongolia, Nicaragua, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Rwanda, Romania, El Salvador , Samoa, Swaziland, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, USSR, Suriname, USA, Ukraine, Uruguay, Federated States of Micronesia, Finland, France, Central African Republic , Czechoslovakia, Chile, Sweden, Ecuador, Estonia, Yugoslavia, Jamaica, Japan. as well as those who voted for (Benin, Bhutan, Botswana, Gabon, Haiti, India, Cape Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Kenya, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Lesotho, Madagascar, Namibia, Nepal, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Thailand, Togo, Fiji, Philippines), apparently, are insignificant, because these countries have neglected the views of Pirlin and Baryshev because of their authority ..
      Threat love UN resolutions? Is it all or selective? I understand, comrade Kim, that you don’t like the resolutions on S. Korea ....
      Resolution of the UN General Assembly A / RES / 68 / 262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine is a document adopted by the 27 on March 2014 as a result of an open vote at the 80 plenary meeting of the 68 session of the UN General Assembly. According to the resolution, the UN General Assembly confirms the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and does not recognize the legality of any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the status of the city of Sevastopol, based on the results of the Crimean referendum held on March 16 2014 year, since this referendum , according to this resolution, has no legal force.
      Of the 193 UN member countries, 100 voted in favor, 11 voted against, 58 abstained, and 24 did not vote.
      And this one?
  8. 0
    4 September 2019 09: 05
    The complex is like a complex. Nothing phenomenal.
  9. 0
    10 September 2019 15: 55
    Quote: rocket757
    Everything is clear, but one of the obvious ways to reduce the cost of missiles, complex, is to sell for export! There is serious COMPETITION in this segment!
    I don’t teach Jews to trade, I just argue.
    I do not teach them to build their defensive systems, but there are nuances that, it seems to me, have not been worked out to the end ... precisely because of the costs, when the gain in efficiency and savings are not immediately obvious!
    Again, without criticizing the mobile complex itself, what is the quality of Israeli technology, I know, even with an unbiased opinion, the advantages over complex systems of other manufacturers are not so obvious!
    Then why fence the garden ???

    What is the export potential? Who can sell a system that does not intercept aerodynamic targets?
  10. 0
    16 September 2019 09: 48
    Quote: E.S.
    Quote: rocket757
    Everything is clear, but one of the obvious ways to reduce the cost of missiles, complex, is to sell for export! There is serious COMPETITION in this segment!
    I don’t teach Jews to trade, I just argue.
    I do not teach them to build their defensive systems, but there are nuances that, it seems to me, have not been worked out to the end ... precisely because of the costs, when the gain in efficiency and savings are not immediately obvious!
    Again, without criticizing the mobile complex itself, what is the quality of Israeli technology, I know, even with an unbiased opinion, the advantages over complex systems of other manufacturers are not so obvious!
    Then why fence the garden ???

    What is the export potential? Who can sell a system that does not intercept aerodynamic targets?

    Why not intercept? What fundamentally differs atmospheric interception ballistic from aerodynamic? For the complex, only software, and the design and energy of the rocket will be limited in range and overload.