EPF Expeditionary Transport Vessel (USA)

28
The US Navy has many transport vessels capable of transporting personnel and equipment. Since the beginning of the current decade, the ships of the Spearhead project have been serving for the speedy transfer of individual units over considerable distances. Current plans provide for the construction of 14 of such vessels, and most of them have already been completed - it remains to be completed and transferred to the customer only 4.


The fourth ship of the USNS Fall River (T-EPF-4) series during testing, July 2014.




Target - speed


In the past, the US Army, Navy and Marine Corps were actively working on the issue of increasing the speed of the transfer of troops to remote theaters of military operations. The army did this in the framework of Theater Support Vessel, while the Navy and the ILC had their own project, High Speed ​​Connector. In 2004, it was decided to merge the two programs in order to obtain a common result.

Since that time, the work was carried out within the framework of the project Joint High Speed ​​Vessel ("Single High-Speed ​​Ship"). In 2015, the classification was changed - the new ships were renamed the Expeditionary Fast Transport (“Expedition High Speed ​​Transport”). The ship’s shipboard numbers have changed accordingly.

The task of the JHSV / EPF program was to create a promising transport vessel, capable of transfering soldiers with equipment or comparable cargo to a distance of about 1000-1200 nautical miles in a minimum time. It was proposed to leave the transports unarmed, but to equip them with developed radio-electronic means similar to those used on warships.


USNS Fall River (T-EPF-4) accelerates


JHSV research continued until 2007-2008, after which the development of a technical project started. A number of defense enterprises from the United States and other countries were attracted to the development work. Upon completion of this program stage, a contractor was selected for the construction of ships. The order was received by Austal USA, the ships were to be built at its plant in the city of Mobile (pc. Alabama).

According to the plans of that time, by the beginning of the twenties, 23 should be built for high-speed transport. In the future, the Pentagon was faced with a reduction in budgets, because of which he was forced to reduce the series to 14 units. Will order additional vessels after the completion of the construction of the planned - is unclear.

Aluminum Catamaran


The main objective of the JHSV / EPF project was to provide an advantageous combination of payload, speed and range. To this end, the project had to apply a number of characteristic ideas and solutions. First of all, it is a catamaran scheme and the widest possible use of light aluminum alloys. Also applied are original layout solutions that simplify the transportation of the required cargo or a large number of people.


EPF ship in section - visible arrangement of cargo and habitable decks


The vessel with a total length of 103 m and a width of 28,5 m is built according to the catamaran scheme with a normal draft of 3,8 m. The displacement is 1515 t. The power plant and other units are placed inside the side hulls. The bridge connecting them is a superstructure with volumes for crew accommodation and payload. The superstructure has a characteristic box-like shape that provides maximum internal volumes. The wheelhouse is located on its roof.

The catamaran is equipped with four MTU 20V8000 M71L diesel engines with horsepower 12200. The power plant also includes four ZF 60000NR2H gearboxes and jet propulsion units. Such units allow the EPF to reach speeds up to 43 nodes. The maximum cruising range is defined in nautical miles 1200.

The on-board set of electronic equipment was developed by General Dynamics Mission Systems and is based on the OPEN CI complex, previously used on ships of the LCS family. The ship receives all the means necessary for driving and interacting with other ships fleet. At the same time, instrumentation does not include the systems necessary for working with weapons.


Equipment on the cargo deck of the USNS Millinocket (T-EPF-3)


JHSV / EPF’s own armament includes only four tomb stands with M2 machine guns around the vessel’s perimeter. It is also possible to attract soldiers to combat work. However, according to the plans of the command, transport ships should not participate in the battles, they should rely on the assistance of warships.

Aft deck is given under the helipad. Next to it there is a place for helicopter transportation and a takeoff and landing control post. The vessel can work with any US Navy helicopters. The operation of the tiltrotor MV-22 on the vessel is excluded in order to avoid their mutual damage.

The ship’s own crew includes from 26 to 46 people depending on the task. Proper distribution of the available volumes made it possible to organize more comfort than on most US Navy ships.


USNS Millinocket Transport (T-EPF-3) unloads vehicles


Payload


Almost all internal volumes of the superstructure are given for the accommodation of people or goods. At the same time, the EPF can transport infantry battalions and its equipment to the battalion. The cargo deck is intended for vehicles, for the people - the cockpits above it. Total load weight approx. 600 t.

Kubriki equipped with 104 beds for a long stay of the landing. For short swims, a set of 312 seats is used. In the premises there are spaces for luggage and weapons. On board there is a supply of fresh water and provisions. The duration of the voyage with a landing party from 312 people is limited to 4 days. It is possible to sail for a duration of 14 days - in this case only the 104 person is transported.

For equipment and armaments, a cargo deck is intended for a length of more than 70 m, a width of 26 m and a height of 4,7 m. The total deck area is approx. 1900 sq.m. Means of securing goods in the field are provided. Access to the cargo deck is provided by a large aft hatch. Loading equipment is carried out on its own using a folding aft ramp mounted on the starboard side. The durability of the ramp ensures loading of any equipment, including tanks. On the port side of the stern there is a crane for non-self-propelled cargoes. The crane and ramp can be used when working with other vessels.


USNS Spearhead lead ship (JHSV-1) before launching, September 8 2011


The main task of the EPF is the transportation of soldiers and vehicles. At the same time it is possible to use ships in special missions. An EMU type hospital or other special equipment can be deployed on the cargo deck.

14 ships


22 July 2010 in Mobile laid the lead ship of the new project - USNS Spearhead (JHSV-1). Subsequently, it received a new tail number T-EPF-1. In September, 2011 was launched, and at the end of 2012 it was handed over to the Shipping Command. Currently, this vessel continues to serve and participates in various combat training activities.

Since 2011, another 11 of JHSV / EPF type vessels has been laid. To date, the customer has received 10 ships, including the head ship. Ships No. 11 and 12 are at different stages of construction. At the end of March, a contract for the last two vehicles appeared. Their construction will begin in 2019-2020.


USNS Spearhead (T-EPF-1) in Motion


The construction of the lead vessel cost $ 214 million. The launch of the series reduced this parameter to 180 millions. In 2015, the lead ship suffered significant damage during operation, and repairs required additional expenses. In addition, as a result of these events, an order for updating the project with a view to strengthening the design appeared. Together with the Spearhead upgrades are four production vessels. All this further increased the cost of the program.

Already at the stage of sea trials, the lead ship USNS Spearhead (T-EPF-1) confirmed the fundamental possibility of solving the problems posed. The vessel successfully developed the declared speed of more than 40 nodes and ensured the transportation of the specified cargo. At the same time, some weaknesses were identified. So, acceleration to the maximum speed is possible only when the waves are no more than 3 points; with 5 points, speed is limited to 3 nodes. On strong waves, the catamaran is prone to greater pitching than ships with a single hull structure. There were also complaints about the comfort in the compartments for the landing. Later, there were problems with the strength of the structure.

Program results


To date, the US Navy managed to get 10 high-speed transport vessels of a new type, it is expected the delivery of another 4. Over the past years, the fleet, the army and the International Labor Commission managed to test such vessels during various exercises and to give them an assessment. The results of operation are still mixed. With a number of significant advantages, EPFs retain significant drawbacks. Nevertheless, despite the corrected or remaining problems, such transports are capable of solving assigned tasks and ensuring the rapid redeployment of subunits.


USNS Spearhead (T-EPF-1) ships, USNS Choctaw County (T-EPF-2) and USNS Fall River (T-EPF-4) based on Little Creek, May 2015.


Spearhead ships regularly participate in exercises. For example, the ship USNS Yuma (T-EPF-8) recently went to the port of Odessa - he was to participate in the exercises Sea Breeze 2019. Other representatives of the project also do not stand idle and provide training for sailors, soldiers and marines, as well as participate in patrols and other activities.

The American concept has already interested the foreign military. In 2014, Austal received an order from the KVMS Oman for the construction of two ships of the HSSV type. The HSSV project is based on the American JHSV / EPF, but provides for the construction of a smaller vessel with a 320 tonnage. Both vessels were built in Australia and were transferred to the customer in 2016.

As part of the Expeditionary Fast Transport program, the army, the KMA and the US Navy have developed and implemented a fundamentally new concept of a transport vessel for the rapid transfer of units. Not all the results of the program coincided with expectations, but in the existing form of the court found application in the structure of the transport fleet of the Navy. In addition, a new concept interested third countries. The construction of the first EPF series continues, and it cannot be excluded that after its completion a new contract will appear on similar vessels or on their analogues of another project.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -12
    2 July 2019 12: 17
    Go somewhere, carry what is known! Dermocracy of the striped people to everyone and everyone!
    Nothing new, only the technique is changing.
    You might think that it will be enviable? but no, everyone has their own priorities.
  2. +5
    2 July 2019 12: 33
    I wonder how they structurally withstand pitching
    1. +3
      2 July 2019 14: 57
      With a calculated wave of up to 3 points and a speed of 40 knots, there will be no pitching at all. On this kind of ships they put active pitching dampers. Neither longitudinal nor transverse rolling will be in principle. Everything is extinguished. Airborne Express. Speed ​​40, spray to the sides.
      Under certain conditions, a good thing. Unless anticipated counteraction. Otherwise, a disposable contraption.
      1. +1
        2 July 2019 15: 22
        3 points - not serious
        and I spoke not about quenching, but about structurally embedded strength, because unlike a single-hulled ship, this is important for a catamaran.
        1. +3
          2 July 2019 15: 54
          There is no strength there. 40 nodal catamaran and strength are incompatible. It says: 5 points - 3 nodes. That is, generally not at all. At this speed, this unit will not be controlled. Just to not drown.
          Australians are building their expresses in 3 corps, and even then they only carry passengers, not tanks. Catamarans with durability have fundamental problems.
          1. 0
            2 July 2019 23: 53
            Possible typo with 3 knots. But I think the meaning is true.
          2. -1
            3 July 2019 00: 04
            that's what is written in English. wiki.
            "At sea state 4 it can travel up to 15 knots, travel only 5 knots in sea state 5, and has to hold position in any sea state higher; while this might be seen as an operational limitation that can delay its arrival to port facilities , the ship was intended to operate closer to shore rather than in blue-water conditions. "
        2. -1
          3 July 2019 11: 46
          Quote: yehat
          3 points - not serious

          Most likely this is a typo. It will be necessary to rummage in the Internet.
  3. +2
    2 July 2019 12: 58
    On some yachts of our "rogue" a couple of battalions can fit, and for the price of yachts and an aircraft carrier buy a mono wassat
    1. +2
      2 July 2019 16: 33
      And if you use motor boats of citizens, then the division can be taken away.
    2. 0
      2 July 2019 19: 41
      At exactly wassat , and if air mattresses, then wait a bit)))
  4. +2
    2 July 2019 13: 51
    not for all our seas toy
    but for the Syrian express, that's it. real express would be good
    1. +1
      2 July 2019 14: 29
      A sideways logistics? Value for money - no one has canceled.
      For emergency, special cases, probably the most, but for constant, systematic work, not ah!
      To hammer nails with a blaster, why?
      Normal, LIFTING, military transport. That will be the most.
      1. +3
        2 July 2019 14: 45
        yes it’s better than loading KILLElectors, it takes at least 775 projects, and goes soon.
        Yes, and what kind of logistics do we have? the aircraft carrier is coming from the north, and the Bosphorus tugs drag the ship mooring, loading the amphibious crane ammunition - this is not logistics, but a need
        1. +2
          2 July 2019 14: 52
          We have lost a lot .... so it is necessary to restore in the mind! Look, consider most of the cargo traffic through the Lend-Lease simpleton "Liberty" pulled on themselves! Because it's cheap and angry.
          This lightning-fast operation on a small scale requires extraordinary solutions, but the protracted, planned work of a completely different, simple and cheap! Schaub was not spoken there, and the war has its own, clearly built economy! Whoever does this does not lose in principle, even winning / losing.
      2. +1
        14 March 2020 23: 11
        I agree. The concept of using this ship is rather ambiguous and resembles the idea of ​​our ekranoplanes, which failed. While the ekranoplanes could land on an unprepared coast. I think that instead of one such ship it is more efficient to build 2-4 BTA aircraft. The fact is that EPFs can deliver soldiers only to the captured port, which means that in most cases the BTA will be able to deliver them. It is much faster and cheaper. Aluminum ships are unlikely to be truly massive in wartime.
        1. 0
          15 March 2020 10: 08
          What are the goals and objectives for this vehicle? Who needs them and why?
          And so, you have to pay for everything. For speed, for range, for the same "invisibility" .... what remains in the end.
          1. 0
            15 March 2020 14: 12
            The article does not clearly describe the tasks, but I can assume that the EPF's task is to quickly transfer the vanguard of troops within one theater of operations, to quickly respond to a threat. This is relevant in an insufficient number of troops. In a simple way: "to plug holes in the front." A historical example is when the British tried to hold their colonies with small forces and for cheap. So back in the 20s, they transferred battalions between Egypt, Palestine and the Arabian Peninsula when, alternately, uprisings arose in these places. But even then they did it with the help of aviation. The mattresses, apparently, also want to control their Mediterranean and Middle Eastern colonies with small forces. Another trick is that their C-17s are the same as the EPF ships, about 200 Lyamas, only this can explain the reasons for the construction of the series. Well, and also the fact that the merchants from Austal clearly have lobbyists in the Armed Forces. They also build the stupid LSC-2. If the S-17 cost as our Il-76, 50-75 million, no one would build EPF, I think.
  5. 0
    2 July 2019 14: 09
    The vessel successfully developed the declared speed of more than 40 knots ...
    ... acceleration to maximum speed is possible only with excitement no more than 3 points; at 5 points, speed is limited to 3 knots.

    Typo? belay
    Or is the difference of 2 points really so critical? what
    1. +2
      2 July 2019 14: 26
      Typo- up to 30 knots!
      1. -1
        3 July 2019 00: 05
        There is no typo, that's what is written in English. wiki.

        "At sea state 4 it can travel up to 15 knots, travel only 5 knots in sea state 5, and has to hold position in any sea state higher; while this might be seen as an operational limitation that can delay its arrival to port facilities , the ship was intended to operate closer to shore rather than in blue-water conditions. "
  6. 0
    2 July 2019 14: 33
    probably, they should still work on the shape of the bow and bottom parts of the "bridge"
  7. 0
    2 July 2019 15: 23
    Quote: Vinnibuh
    and for the price of yachts

    it would be necessary to humiliate the amers by recording these yachts in the luxury landing fleet.
    they have speed, we have terms of transportation. let's see whose sailors howl first laughing
  8. +3
    2 July 2019 15: 48
    if the vessels are not armed, then they need escort, otherwise they will multiply by zero very quickly. if you give accompaniment, then there is no particular sense in 40 knots of speed, as for me a rather controversial concept
    1. +2
      2 July 2019 16: 39
      These ships are just like a dagger, which is. Which is used point blank.
      Presenting the situation of their use is simple. Three pieces of such a ship will make a rustle anywhere. And they can, for example, make a throw during the night and land a bunch of people (with normal tanks !!!) where necessary. And if there are more of them, then they can cause big problems.
      And accompanied by aviation. The Americans have a lot of it.
  9. +1
    2 July 2019 23: 52
    The most beautiful ships. And very effective in their industry. Here the question is not enviable - not enviable. It seems to me that this nonsense is not able to overcome some of its complexes and not appreciate the good technique even of an opponent.
    It is unfortunate that we all understand why such a technique will be used. and these are not peaceful goals at all. And as usual - violence, coercion, the establishment of their own rules. Alas.
    I did not like much the strong dependence on excitement, but in the end they did not cross the ocean.
    1. 0
      11 July 2019 13: 51
      It seems to me that this nonsense is not able to overcome some of its complexes and not appreciate the good technique even of an opponent

      And what's good in it ??? As practice has shown, such ships can be destroyed with one old missile, without a cover they are useless, and the cover should move at the same speed (and there are none), otherwise all the speed advantages of these ships are lost.
      1. 0
        15 July 2019 20: 40
        It seems to me that they have slightly different tasks and opportunities. And cover from missiles is a gain. If necessary, they will deliver. The same helicopters can be shot down with a burst of machine gun, but no one says that this is a bad technique and you do not need to use them to deliver troops.
        Again, it seems to me a matter of application.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"