During the exhibition in Tianjin showed the Chinese tank "drift"

26
In the Chinese Tianjin, an exhibition of weapons and military equipment. It presents samples of weapons from dozens of companies, including the China Bing Group and Dongfeng. The exhibition draws attention to the fact that viewers are invited to get acquainted with the exhibits not only in their stationary form, but also during the performance of demonstrative dynamic elements.

During the exhibition in Tianjin showed the Chinese tank "drift"




One of the spectacular elements of the program at a special training ground was tank "drift" - a demonstration of the driving performance of Chinese-made tanks. Movement along the training ground was carried out, as stated, at top speed, with fairly sharp turns and conditional access to the firing position.



The spectators say that the "drift" was quite spectacular, but when it came to overcoming the improvised hill, the tankers slowed down and the tank rolled over the hill rather slowly. At the same time in the Chinese media, the performances of the PLA tankmen loudly called "Tank flying through the sand." The "flew" tank exclusively in the horizontal plane, without showing any spectacular jumps.



Type99, ZTZ-98 (Type98) tanks and other armored vehicles, including wheeled, were demonstrated at the test site.
  • sina.com.cn
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 June 2019 09: 52
    I don't know how he "flew" there, but judging by the photo, he has good protection of the front and side projections, at least externally. After all, these tanks also went through the "baptism of fire".
    And at the expense of the drift, in order to increase the effect, the Chinese should have built concrete platforms in the turning places, then there would have been less dust and spectacular sparks from under the tracks would have flown ...
    1. -4
      27 June 2019 09: 54
      What a flaw, to find fault, to question and ridicule everything "not ours" ... ?? (to the author of the article) ... China is developing and it is not necessary to exalt it ... just as it is not necessary to humiliate, patronizingly ridicule it ..

      from the article:
      "
      .... however, when it came to overcoming an impromptu hill, the tankers slowed down and the tank crossed the hill rather slowly.


      ... The tank "flew" exclusively in the horizontal plane, not showing any spectacular jumps.
      "
      1. +5
        27 June 2019 09: 56
        Quote: Nasr
        What kind of inferiority, to find fault and make fun of is not ours ...

        One would like to ask, where did you see this in this article?
      2. +2
        27 June 2019 11: 04
        I will add that I was much more impressed with the stabilization of the z-99 than the t90 jumps.
        Chinese on the move much more accurately shoots ours
    2. 0
      27 June 2019 09: 56
      Fifteen hundred horses in 56 tone, why not fly?
      1. +5
        27 June 2019 10: 04
        Quote: armata_armata
        Fifteen hundred horses in 56 tone, why not fly?

        Not so simple. Yes, 26,78 horses per ton, this is a fairly high figure, but what gear ratio they have chosen in the transmission is not known. And yet, "to take off" is a third of the matter, it would still not be good to land softly and without consequences for the equipment and crew. And judging by the results of tank biathlon, these "Chinese tanks" have problems with the reliability of the suspension system and suspension, under such loads. Either the truck will burst, or the balance beam will fall off ...
        1. +2
          27 June 2019 10: 09
          Not so simple. Yes, 26,78 horses per ton, this is a fairly high figure, but what gear ratio they have chosen in the transmission is not known. And yet, "to take off" is a third of the matter, it would still not be good to land softly and without consequences for the equipment and crew.

          I do not argue with this, the very concept of such a "flight" of heavily armored vehicles is really not clear to me, well, God bless her
          And judging by the results of tank biathlon, these "Chinese tanks" have problems with the reliability of the suspension system and suspension, it is under such loads

          At the tank biathlon Type 96 was shown, this is a completely different tank ...
          1. +2
            27 June 2019 10: 20
            Quote: armata_armata
            I do not argue with this, the very concept of such a "flight" of heavily armored vehicles is really not clear to me, well, God bless her

            Pure demonstration of opportunities.
            Quote: armata_armata
            At the tank biathlon Type 96 was shown, this is a completely different tank ...

            Yes, they are not completely different, this is all the development line of our T-72, but it would be interesting to see these machines in biathlon
        2. 0
          27 June 2019 11: 26
          Well, they are still heavier than ours. direct comparison cannot be made
          and biathlon, whatever one may say, is imprisoned for t72 / 90
          1. +2
            27 June 2019 11: 32
            Quote: yehat
            and biathlon, whatever one may say, is imprisoned for t72 / 90

            When passing the biathlon circle there are no obstacles and barriers designed only for our T-72 / 90, there are quite other machines that can be used.
      2. 0
        27 June 2019 10: 05
        not enough, somewhere a third should be, that is, a thrust of 18 tons. and aerodynamic quality is serious lol
    3. +1
      27 June 2019 09: 59
      and if we add titanium parts to the tracks, the sparks would be blue
  2. +5
    27 June 2019 10: 01
    I also drift))) this is a drift, the fast and the furious nervously smokes in the funnel)))
    1. -2
      27 June 2019 10: 13
      Quote: loki565
      I also drift)))

      Yes, in the drift itself on the tank there is nothing particularly complicated, the main thing is that the coupling properties of the track with the surface at this moment would not be high and that’s all ...

  3. 0
    27 June 2019 10: 01
    At the same time, in the Chinese media, the speeches of the PLA tankers loudly called "Tank flying in the sand." The tank "flew" exclusively in the horizontal plane, without showing any spectacular jumps.

    It seems the Chinese think that this tank does not need to jump. In my opinion, the Chinese created it only for desert wars. request
    1. 0
      27 June 2019 11: 07
      Quote: Simon
      In my opinion, the Chinese created it only for desert wars

      sand is not the most pleasant soil.
      if the tank behaves well in the sand, then in addition to the mountainous and marshy territory it will feel good everywhere.
      in general, the Chinese have the concept of MBT + light tanks for difficult terrain
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. -1
    27 June 2019 10: 46
    They just do not have a very good distribution of these horses on the drive and track rollers, as well as serious problems with the transmission. They do not hide this. Therefore, their rollers fly out very often, and the goose breaks, and the sprocket crumbles. I saw this in biathlon personally. They also had a problem with loading very often. Well, the training of tankers is up to standard. I want to note that these are all childhood diseases and I think that they will get rid of their equipment from them, just like their auto industry is getting rid of these diseases. The only where we are still ahead of them and I think we will continue to lead this military-industrial complex and the cosmos.
  6. 0
    27 June 2019 11: 00
    Quote: svp67
    and lateral projections he has good, at least outwardly

    what did you see on board?
  7. -1
    27 June 2019 11: 25
    I am worried about their number of tanks ... they can reach Moscow
  8. -1
    27 June 2019 11: 42
    Quote: svp67
    other machines can be used there too.

    just don’t say that the angle of climb on the slides is random)))
  9. -3
    27 June 2019 11: 43
    Quote: Saboteur Holuay
    can reach Moscow

    they will not reach Chita - there will not be enough resource.
    German engines can withstand, but the chassis - no.
    1. -2
      27 June 2019 12: 43
      They better have an option, through Kazakhstan, the warehouse was burnt there.
  10. -1
    27 June 2019 12: 00
    even though there are photographs. I actually expected the video
  11. -4
    27 June 2019 12: 40
    How many million hectares have been given to the Chinese for cutting down the taiga? Then these pieces of iron will roll in incredible quantities. As a sergeant in the Soviet army, I never thought that I would live to see such a nightmare. The Chinese are our "friends", and the Ukrainians are our enemies.
  12. -1
    27 June 2019 15: 31
    Quote: svp67
    Quote: loki565
    I also drift)))

    Yes, in the drift itself on the tank there is nothing particularly complicated, the main thing is that the coupling properties of the track with the surface at this moment would not be high and that’s all ...


    This is not a "drift" excuse, but a yuz. And "abrashki" is generally disgusting to look at.
    A drift on a tracked vehicle looks like this:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO5ZI3mH-BY
    At the same incomplete 30hp per ton
  13. 0
    29 June 2019 08: 35
    Quote: yehat
    tanks for difficult terrain

    Siberia and the Far East

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"