APRKSN "Prince Vladimir" of the project "Borey-A" entered the second stage of running gears.

Nuclear-powered strategic-purpose underwater missile "Prince Vladimir" of the modified 955A project "Borey-A" resumed sea trials, leaving for sea from Severodvinsk. The first part of the factory running tests was carried out in November-December last year.


APRKSN "Prince Vladimir" of the project "Borey-A" entered the second stage of running gears.


APRKSN "Prince Vladimir" came from Severodvinsk to the second stage of factory running tests. The first entry into the ZHI was on 28 on November 2018 of the year and lasted until December 22, after which the submarine cruiser was returned to the enterprise to eliminate the deficiencies identified during the tests and to make improvements.

The lead submarine cruiser of the Borey-A project was laid on Sevmash in Severodvinsk on July 30 2012 of the year, the output from the workshop took place on November 17 of the year 2017. According to the plans of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the transfer of the nuclear underwater missile carrier "Prince Vladimir" to the Russian Navy should take place before the end of this year.

At present, four more serial ARPXNs of this 955 project are being built at Sevmash: Prince Oleg (officially laid on July 27 2014), Generalissimus Suvorov (laid on December 26 2014 of the year), Emperor Alexander III (laid on December 18 2015) year) and "Prince Pozharsky" (founded December 23 2016 of the year).

Currently part of the naval fleet Three atomic missile submarines of project 955 (Borey) of the 4th generation are in service - the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh. In the future, the construction of the underwater cruisers of the Borey and Borey-A projects is not planned. Instead, the Ministry of Defense is considering the option of laying in the near future two submarines - carriers of cruise missiles of the Caliber, Onyx or Zircon type. The project received the preliminary name "Borey-K".

The submarines of the 955 and 955А projects (Borey and Borey-A) were developed by the Central Design Bureau of the Marine Equipment Rubin. The differences between the 955 and 955А projects were not disclosed, however, it is known that the Borea-A, compared to the Boreas, modernized the hull designs, uses new electronics, and the 955A boats are better stealth.
Photos used:
CrazyMk / forums.airbase.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Andrey VOV 13 June 2019 10: 50 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    What all the same this boat is healthy ....
    1. Aerodrome 13 June 2019 11: 21 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      What all the same this boat is healthy ....

      not a "shark" ... but ...
      1. WILL 13 June 2019 11: 53 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        You can congratulate the Severomortsev! good
        I hope that it is valid until the end of the year!
    2. Ross xnumx 13 June 2019 12: 10 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      What all the same this boat is healthy ....

      There is no happiness in size - only 179 parrots (170 m) in length, and 14 parrots (13,5 m) in width ... (parrot Ara = 95 cm long) laughing
      Armament and stealth are her documents. 16 launchers + torpedoes ... In short, what is needed for the fleet.
      hi
    3. Redbul 13 June 2019 12: 31 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      What all the same this boat is healthy ....

      And the main name is what is appropriate .. On this submarine I think everything is clear and the latest weapons at the level !!!
      Nuclear submarines and hypersound, this is a chip of Russia! Well, the most important thing is COSMOS, there we must again become the first, and then to hell we’re not the brother of men .. May God give health and long life to our engineers, engineers .. We need to protect them like the apple of an eye! They work for the idea of ​​Strong Russia, and not for money .. soldier
  2. prior 13 June 2019 10: 56 New
    • 10
    • 10
    0
    A great reason to increase the production of diapers from the Yankees.
    Seven feet under the keel !
  3. Valery Valery 13 June 2019 11: 01 New
    • 12
    • 8
    +4
    One more unit in our system!
    In the Northern Fleet, all the infrastructure for it is prepared.
    1. Tiksi-3 13 June 2019 11: 25 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      Quote: Valery Valery
      One more unit in our system!

      in which formation? ... they promise to surrender it in 2020 !! ... so not in formation !!
      1. Artemiy_2 13 June 2019 15: 39 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        In fact, there was no postponement of borea. Vladimir is still promised to pass this year
  4. NEXUS 13 June 2019 11: 15 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    We build boreas relatively quickly, but we can’t get them defended in the form of Ash-M. We cannot test Kazan, the rest are under construction. And in fact there is only one Severodvinsk out of the new multi-purpose vehicles, which is very different from the Yasen-M project.
    1. 2 Level Advisor 13 June 2019 11: 36 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      Well, yes .. shifting to the right, in principle, is not very strong, not like in other places, just a couple of years .. Monomakh is a year late, Oleg and Suvorov this year should be on the water .. and at best only next year .. and the fleet will be transferred + 1-2 years more ..
      There is an interesting conclusion - taking into account the fact that, for example, under the RPKSN TOF full “seams” of 3 nuclear submarines in the ranks, one of them is still the ancient 667BDR 80 years old (the last in the Navy) .. to replace Oleg and Suvorov ..
      And what do we see when a complete "ambush" - 2-3 SSBNs is clearly not enough on the Pacific Ocean, even if only 1 unit on the database is always ... At least 4 units are needed. minimum .. AND SO ATTENTION !!! when the "ambush" everything is built almost on time .. So we can - if we want? so why don't we want to?
      1. 2 Level Advisor 13 June 2019 14: 25 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        the position of the minusers is interesting, he outlined the "pure" facts, but they throw minuses .. nothing to say? or maybe in fact instead of 3 SSBNs in the Pacific Fleet - there are 8 pieces?
    2. jonht 13 June 2019 11: 37 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      You can’t argue with that. But there is one nuance .... Ash-M is said to be significantly different from the head in the filling. And as we have another problem with the refinement of equipment.
    3. Grits 13 June 2019 15: 03 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: NEXUS
      We build the boreas relatively quickly, but we can’t defeat them in the form of Ashen-M. Kazan is not tested, the rest are under construction. And in fact there is only one Severodvinsk out of the new multi-purpose vehicles, which is very different from the Yasen

      Borea is not so different from previous BDMs as Ash from previous Sharks. Ash is a very new and too sophisticated boat. Once I went to the BDM for testing. Everything always went smoothly. But recently a friend from Severodvinsk came to see me. He told me that when they went to sea on Severodvinsk, the submission team spat and cursed. Too much new and incomprehensible. Too many inconsistencies and malfunctions. This ship was sailing heavily. Therefore, Kazan is also not easy
  5. Dzafdet 13 June 2019 12: 18 New
    • 1
    • 14
    -13
    But there aren’t any rockets, but hands under the finger ... laughing tongue wassat
    1. Redbul 13 June 2019 12: 35 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      Quote: Dzafdet
      But there aren’t any rockets, but hands under the finger ... laughing tongue wassat

      Remind you of the "Caliber" from the Caspian, from simple boats? And then we'll figure it out. do not worry so much for Russia))))
      1. Thunderbringer 13 June 2019 13: 18 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        This one from the Crimean Bridge will collapse series
        Never mind.
    2. Artemiy_2 13 June 2019 15: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      not tired of lying? This is not the first time you write it
  6. nikolas 83 13 June 2019 13: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Borey-K with cruise missiles would not be bad. Or a universal boat so that you can change pu from mbr to tpk with cruise missiles, depending on the task.
  7. Dzafdet 13 June 2019 16: 01 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Artemiy_2
    not tired of lying? This is not the first time you write it


    What does it mean to lie? The rocket is raw and the sailors are fucking with it. So the Navy is not used to working with SLBMs ... So there are boats, but there are NO RELIABLE missiles for them ...
    1. Artemiy_2 13 June 2019 16: 39 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
  8. Old26 14 June 2019 10: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: nikolas 83
    Borey-K with cruise missiles would not be bad. Or a universal boat so that you can change pu from mbr to tpk with cruise missiles, depending on the task.

    Universal, on which you can change the ICBM launchers to TPK with the Kyrgyz Republic will be very expensive. To have a KR carrier boat is also not entirely clear why. Especially in the dimensions of "Borea".
  9. Dzafdet 15 June 2019 17: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: nikolas 83
    Borey-K with cruise missiles would not be bad. Or a universal boat so that you can change pu from mbr to tpk with cruise missiles, depending on the task.

    Universal, on which you can change the ICBM launchers to TPK with the Kyrgyz Republic will be very expensive. To have a KR carrier boat is also not entirely clear why. Especially in the dimensions of "Borea".



    So according to the plans, they should shoot the KR .. But what will happen in real life? ...
  10. Dzafdet 15 June 2019 17: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Artemiy_2



    https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2016/09/28/10219247.shtml#page1..хе-хе...