Soviet Venus Research and Development Program

21
From the very beginning of the space age of mankind, the interest of many scientists, researchers and designers was confined to Venus. The planet with a beautiful female name, which in Roman mythology belonged to the goddess of love and beauty, attracted scientists because it was the closest planet to the Earth of the solar system. In many of its characteristics (size and mass), Venus is close to Earth, for which it is even called the “sister” of our planet. Also Venus, like Mars, belongs to the terrestrial planets. The Soviet Union achieved the greatest success in Venus research: the first spacecraft to Venus were sent already in 1961 year, and a large-scale research program lasted until the middle of 1980-s.


Comparison of the size of Venus and Earth




Very often on the Internet you can find materials that relate to the Soviet program of development or even the colonization of Venus. It should be noted that such programs have never been seriously considered, accepted or implemented in practice. At the same time, near-scientific articles and materials that dealt with the development of Venus and the possibility of its use by man really appeared. Today on the official website of the Roscosmos television studio you can find an interview with the design engineer Sergey Krasnoselsky, which tells about the projects for the development of Venus. This question has always interested scientists, engineers, designers and just people who are interested in space, but from a theoretical point of view. The practical side of the Soviet space program was focused on the study of Venus. And in this issue the USSR has achieved outstanding success. The number and scale of the research conducted and the satellites and space stations sent to Venus led to the fact that in the world of astronautics, Venus began to be called the “Russian Planet”.

What do we know about Venus


Venus is the third brightest object in the earth’s sky after the Sun and Moon, and you can watch the planet in good weather without a telescope. In its brilliance, the closest planet to the Earth of the Solar System is significantly superior to even the brightest stars, and Venus can also be easily distinguished from the stars by their even white color. Because of its location relative to the sun, Venus can be observed from Earth either some time after sunset, or before sunrise, therefore, in the culture, two bright definitions for the planet were fixed: “evening star” and “morning star”.

Observation of Venus is available to the average man in the street, but scientists, of course, are not attracted to this. Being the closest planet to Earth (the distance to Venus at different times ranges from 38 to 261 million kilometers, for comparison, the distance to Mars is from 55,76 to 401 million kilometers), Venus also belongs to the planets of the Earth group, along with Mercury and Mars. Venus was not accidentally called the “sister of the Earth”, in its size and mass: the mass is 0,815 terrestrial, the volume is 0,857 terrestrial it is very close to our home planet.

Soviet Venus Research and Development Program


In the foreseeable future, only two planets in the solar system can be considered as possible objects of colonization: Venus and Mars. And taking into account the accumulated volume of knowledge on Venus, which was obtained, including thanks to the domestic astronautics, the obvious option remained only one - Mars. Venus, despite its similarity with the Earth in mass and size, proximity to our planet and a large surface area, since Venus has no oceans, the planet is very unfriendly. Venus receives two times more energy from the Sun than the Earth. On the one hand, this could be an advantage, allowing to solve many problems due to the energy of natural origin, but, on the other hand, this is the main problem. The advantages of Venus end quickly enough, but the shortcomings of the “morning star” are much larger, it is simply impossible for man to live and exist on the surface of Venus. The only option is to master the atmosphere of Venus, but to implement such a project in practice is very difficult.

For a person, the conditions of being on Venus are not just uncomfortable, they are intolerable. Since the temperature on the surface of the planet can reach 475 degrees Celsius, it is higher than the temperature on the surface of Mercury, located two times closer to the Sun than Venus. It is for this reason that the “morning star” is the hottest planet in our solar system. At the same time, temperature drops during the day are insignificant. Such a high temperature on the surface of the planet is due to the greenhouse effect, which is created by the atmosphere of Venus on 96,5 percent consisting of carbon dioxide. A person will not be happy with the pressure on the surface of the planet, which is 93 times the pressure on Earth. This corresponds to the pressure that is observed in the oceans on Earth when submerged to a depth of about one kilometer.

Soviet research program of Venus


The USSR began the study of Venus before the first flight of Yuri Gagarin into space. 12 February 1961 from the Baikonur cosmodrome to the second planet of the solar system went to the spacecraft Venus-1. The Soviet automatic interplanetary station flew in 100 thousands of kilometers from Venus, managing to reach its heliocentric orbit. True, the radio connection with the station "Venus-1" was lost earlier, when it retired from the Earth by about three million kilometers, the cause was a malfunction of equipment on board the station. From this case, lessons were learned, the information obtained was useful in the design of the following spacecraft. And the station Venus-1 itself became the first spacecraft to fly at close range from Venus.


The descent vehicle of the Venus-7 automatic interplanetary station. 1 layout: 1


Over the next 20 and more, the Soviet Union sent dozens of spacecraft of various purposes to Venus, some of which successfully completed scientific missions in the vicinity and on the very surface of the planet. At the same time, the process of studying Venus by Soviet scientists was complicated by the fact that the researchers simply did not have data on pressure and temperature on the planet second from the Sun.

The launch of "Venus-1" was followed by a series of unsuccessful launches, which were interrupted by the launch of the Venus-3 automatic interplanetary station in November 1965, which was finally able to reach the surface of the second planet of the Solar System, becoming the first in the world stories a spacecraft that got to another planet. The station was unable to transmit data about Venus itself, even before landing on the AMC, the control system failed, but thanks to this launch, valuable information about space and near-planet space was obtained, and a large array of trajectory data was accumulated. The information obtained was useful for improving the quality of ultra-long-haul communications and future flights between the planets of the solar system.

The next Soviet space station, called Venus-4, allowed scientists to obtain the first data on the density, pressure and temperature of Venus, and then the whole world learned that the atmosphere of the "morning star" is more than 90 percent carbon dioxide. Another important event in the history of the study of Venus was the launch of the Soviet apparatus "Venus-7". 15 December 1970 was the first ever soft landing of a spacecraft on the surface of Venus. The Venus-7 station has forever entered the history of astronautics, as the first fully operational spacecraft, which successfully landed on another planet in the solar system. In 1975, the Soviet devices “Venus-9” and “Venus-10” allowed scientists to obtain the first panoramic images from the surface of the planet under study, and in 1982, the landing device of the station “Venera-13” assembled by the designers of the Lavochkin Scientific-Production Association, sent to the Earth the first ever color photographs of Venus from its landing site.


Venus Surface Images


According to Roskosmos, just from 1961 to 1983 year, the Soviet Union sent automatic interplanetary stations to Venus 16, also in 1964, after the launch of the AMS "Venus-1", the uncontrolled passage of Venus "Zond-1" was made, and in 1984 the year was “ the morning star "went to two new Soviet apparatus, called" Vega-1 "and" Vega-2. "

"Flying Islands of Venus"


According to experts, the only option for the development of Venus by man is life in its atmosphere, and not on the surface. Back at the beginning of 1970, Soviet engineer Sergey Viktorovich Zhitomirskiy published an article titled “Flying Islands of Venus”. The article appeared in the 9 issue of Technique for Youth magazine for 1971 a year. A person can live on Venus, but only in the atmosphere at an altitude of about 50-60 kilometers using air balloons or airships. It is extremely difficult to implement this project, but the mechanism of development is clear. If a man managed to gain a foothold in the atmosphere of Venus, the next step would be to change it. Actually Venus is better than Mars by the fact that the atmosphere on the planet really exists, that it is not fit for life and colonization is another question. Theoretically, mankind could direct efforts to modify the atmosphere of Venus, using the accumulated knowledge and technology.

One of the first who proposed the idea of ​​mastering and settling the clouds and the atmosphere of Venus was the scientist of the American space agency and science fiction writer Jeffrey Landis. He also noticed that the surface of the planet is too unfriendly for the colonists, and the pressure on the surface is simply monstrous and far from the pressure in one terrestrial atmosphere, while Venus is still a planet of the earth group, much like Earth and with almost the same acceleration free the fall. But for humans, Venus becomes friendly only at a height of more than 50 kilometers above the surface. At this altitude, a person is confronted with air pressure that is comparable to that of the earth and approaches the same atmosphere. At the same time, the atmosphere itself is still dense enough to protect potential colonists from harmful radiation, fulfilling the same protective screen role as the atmosphere of the Earth. At the same time, the temperature also becomes more comfortable, falling to 60 degrees Celsius, it is still hot, but humanity and the available technologies allow to cope with such a temperature. Moreover, if you rise several kilometers higher, the temperature will become even more comfortable, reaching 25-30 degrees, and the atmosphere itself will still protect people from radiation. Advantages of Venus also include the fact that the gravity of the planet is comparable to that of the earth, so the colonists could live in the clouds of Venus for years without any special consequences for their body: their muscles would not weaken, and the bones would not become fragile.



The Soviet engineer Sergey Zhitomirsky, who was hardly familiar with the point of view of his American colleague, also held about the same point of view. He also spoke about the possibility of deploying a permanent scientific base in the atmosphere of Venus at an altitude of more than 50 kilometers. According to his plans, this could be either a large balloon or, even better, a dirigible. The airship shell Zhytomyr proposed to be made of thin corrugated metal. According to his ideas, this would have made the shell tough enough, but left the ability to change the volume. In the atmosphere of the "morning star" the base was to cruise at a predetermined height along predetermined trajectories, moving above the surface of the planet and, if necessary, hovering in the sky above certain points of interest to researchers.

He thought a Soviet engineer and how to fill the shell of aircraft for the sky of Venus. According to his idea to carry helium, traditional for these purposes, from Earth, made no sense. Although the helium's own weight would be approximately 9 percent of the mass of balloons, cylinders in which it would be necessary to transport gas to the planet under the pressure of atmospheres 300-350, would be pulled as much as the entire aircraft would weigh. Therefore, Sergey Zhitomirskiy proposed to take ammonia from low-pressure cylinders or ordinary water from the Earth, which would help to significantly reduce the mass of cargo delivered. Already on Venus under the pressure of the high temperatures of the planet, these liquids themselves would turn into steam (without any energy consumption), which would serve as a working fluid for a balloon.

In any case, neither in the 1970-ies, nor now the program for the development of Venus is not a priority for the development of world space exploration. Colonization of other planets is a very expensive pleasure, especially when it comes to such an environment unfavorable to human life, which is today observed on the surface of the "morning star". So far, all the views of mankind are riveted to Mars, which, although it is further away and does not have its own atmosphere, still seems to be a much more friendly planet. Especially if we consider the option of building a scientific base on the Martian surface.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    11 June 2019 18: 53
    What Mars, a neighbor would be bitten ...
  2. +1
    11 June 2019 19: 17
    Better bite several times, so surely!
  3. +16
    11 June 2019 19: 19
    Fantasy! All results were achieved when developers had much less tools than at present. I do not want to be like whiners wounding their moody whining on any topic. But still he asked himself. What is more important for me personally is to find out what conditions of life on Venus are and to know that my country has gained knowledge about it or have the right to speak out without any regard for any reason and listen to people who often have no idea what they are talking about. As for whom - for me the first is more important. I foresee that they will attack me. But what about the empty store shelves? So after all, everything was in orders; meat consumption in the eighties was only slightly less than now. The ability to travel - but I had a huge country at my disposal, if you wanted, you could go to the German Democratic Republic or the Czech Republic without any visa - even on a tank if you wanted to. They stole - and even then they stole, but what is happening now is incomprehensible to the mind. Someday I could imagine. that Ukraine will become an enemy. This is what we have lost. But it is useless to whine about it - you cannot return the past.
  4. +2
    11 June 2019 19: 51
    Projects and fantasies for the development of Venus, (until they find there gravitapia) what is there to take in the clouds for earthlings? CO2-so we ourselves, fossils, it’s easier to take on other planets or process from our own landfills (this is where a storehouse of useful minerals is).
    1. +2
      11 June 2019 23: 21
      Quote: evgen1221
      Projects and fantasies for the development of Venus, (until they find there gravitapia) what is there to take in the clouds for earthlings? CO2-so we ourselves, fossils, it’s easier to take on other planets or process from our own landfills (this is where a storehouse of useful minerals is).

      Imagine what a megaproject for a saw - the terraforming of Venus! To declare it a national project - and to shoot "Angara" blanks towards Venus at the price of this equipment. All the same, you can't check (well, or let Navalny fly to check one way). And we have talents for whom nanotechnology is too small already.
  5. +3
    11 June 2019 20: 33
    If only there was no war! I consider space only for this. Everything else is show off and fantastic. With such a birth rate as ours, in 25 years others will already be exploring our Russia, who will not give a damn about space, but not on our territory!
  6. +8
    11 June 2019 21: 04
    The USSR began the study of Venus before the first flight of Yuri Gagarin into space. On February 12, 1961, the spacecraft "Venus-1" set off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome to the second planet of the Solar System
    The USSR began the study of Venus on February 4, 1961 with the launch of Sputnik-7, aka Heavy Satellite 01. It did not start to Venus, remained in very low Earth orbit due to a failure of the upper stage.
    The device was called a heavy satellite in the press, so as not to disclose the fact of an unsuccessful launch.
    Uncontrolled "Heavy satellite 01", being in low orbit, existed for three turns. Descended from Siberia. A strange trajectory and an obscure TASS report gave rise to speculation in the press that this was a disaster for a manned ship. The medal that the 1VA No. 1 device was supposed to deliver to the surface of Venus survived. A protective ball with a medal inside was found in the summer of 1963 by a bathing boy in the Biryus river.
    The Soviet automatic interplanetary station flew 100 thousand kilometers from Venus, managing to enter its heliocentric orbit.
    The station could not go "into its heliocentric orbit", otherwise it would revolve around the Sun in the same orbit as Venus. The station entered its own heliocentric orbit.
    The launch of Venus-1 was followed by a series of unsuccessful launches, which were interrupted by the launch of the automatic interplanetary station Venus-3 in November 1965
    The launch of Venus 1 was followed by the launch of Venus 2, which flew in tandem with Venus 3.
    The Venera-2 station was launched on November 12, 1965 at 8 hours 2 minutes Moscow time. A television system and scientific instruments were installed at the station. On February 27, 1966, the station flew at a distance of 24 km from the planet Venus and switched to a heliocentric orbit. During the flight, 000 communication sessions were conducted with the Venera-26 station (2 with Venus-63). However, the station control system failed even before its approach to Venus. The station did not transmit any data on Venus.
    Four days after the launch of Venus-2, on November 16, 1965, the Venus-3 station was launched, which carried a descent vehicle instead of a photo-television installation. The Venera-3 station reached the planet Venus on March 1, 1966, two days after the Venera-2 station.
    1. +1
      11 June 2019 21: 44
      Many years ago I talked with a mathematician who was concerned with calculating the trajectories of interplanetary stations. He told me that the lack of computing power in the USSR at that time did not allow to accurately solve the problem of the "three bodies" Earth-Venus-Sun. Therefore, we applied the iteration method. That is, based on the study of the trajectories of the first unsuccessful launches, amendments were introduced, which in the end made it possible to achieve an accurate hit on the target. The Americans had more powerful computers, but they also failed to successfully launch the device to Mars according to the Mariner program the first time.
    2. +5
      11 June 2019 21: 45
      According to experts, the only option for the development of Venus by man is life in its atmosphere, and not on the surface.
      Not the only one. There is such a term as terraforming - a change in the climatic conditions of a planet, satellite, or other cosmic body to bring the atmosphere, temperature, and environmental conditions into a condition suitable for the living of terrestrial animals and plants.
      In relation to Venus, the first option was proposed in 1961 by the famous American astronomer Carl Sagan. Carl Sagan suggested throwing some chlorella into the atmosphere of Venus. It was assumed that without natural enemies, the algae would multiply exponentially and relatively quickly fix carbon dioxide in large quantities in organic compounds and enrich the atmosphere of Venus with oxygen. This in turn will reduce the greenhouse effect, due to which the temperature of the surface of Venus will decrease.
      Similar projects are proposed now - for example, it is proposed to spray in the atmosphere of Venus genetically modified (for survival during flight in atmospheric currents) blue-green algae, at a level of 50-60 km from the surface, on which the pressure is about 1,1 bar and temperature about +30 degrees Celsius.
      Subsequently, when further studies showed that water is almost completely absent in the atmosphere of Venus, Sagan abandoned this idea. In order for these and other photosynthetic climate transformation projects to be possible, it is necessary to solve the problem of water on Venus, for example, deliver it there artificially or find a way to synthesize water "in place" from other compounds.
      1. +2
        11 June 2019 22: 58
        Quote: Undecim
        There is such a term as terraforming - a change in the climatic conditions of the planet,

        The term exists of course, but with existing technologies it is thousands of years old. And then .. not with the current social system. Socialism hardly planned for five years, you know capitalism .. for six months ahead, nothing can be predicted :)

        The very idea of ​​space exploration today does not make sense. On chemical missiles, flying to Mars is like swimming on a log across the Atlantic. For the argument, especially drunk, you can probably just once, but nothing serious can be organized here. Before the advent of next-generation engines, this is only entertainment for journalists.

        As a result, for today, only intelligence on the subject that we have a number of interesting things, and we are waiting for breakthroughs in space engines.
        1. +8
          11 June 2019 23: 12
          The speed of technology development is also sometimes difficult to predict.

          My first calculator. At the time of going on sale in 1964, it cost 1193 dollars. But this is only a little more than half a century has passed.
          1. +5
            11 June 2019 23: 43
            Interestingly, it moved the individual, who put under the minus comments. It seems that the time has come to introduce testing on the site for adequacy, since nothing else can be explained by the lack of it.
            1. AUL
              +5
              12 June 2019 06: 04
              Quote: Undecim
              Interestingly, it moved the individual, who put under the minus comments.

              So there are some "comrades" here who minus not the meaning of the commentary, but the author! fool
        2. +3
          12 June 2019 01: 26
          The term exists of course, but with existing technologies it is thousands of years old.

          2, 8 billion years ago began on Earth with cyanobacteria, ended 500 million years ago with the formation of a modern atmosphere with 20% oxygen. 2,3 billion years were required on Earth to make what is now from carbon dioxide. This is in the presence of water, without which practically nothing. 2,3 billion years, all oxygen produced went to the oxidation of iron first in water, then rocks on land. Even if there was water on Venus, we still won’t have time before the Sun burns and goes out. request
          So take care of nature, your mother ....
          1. +1
            12 June 2019 01: 57
            Previously, traces of vital activity were found in rocks aged 4,3 billion years ago. Life was born almost immediately.
          2. 0
            29 August 2019 01: 30
            And before that, a fire raged on the earth. It burned 40 percent of oxygen and formed coal. If for you the example of Mars, it turned red after the loss of a significant part of the atmosphere, the main component of which was not oxygen .. So .. in the order of delirium ...
  7. +1
    11 June 2019 23: 04
    Could, without chips, without computers. Soviet school, and which won the struggle for the desk.
    1. +1
      12 June 2019 06: 19
      Could, without chips, without computers. Soviet school, and which won the struggle for the desk

      Well, don’t, there were chips and computers, and of such quality that after they landed on Venus the device remained alive for another two hours, no one else could repeat, the rest had all the electronics in the atmosphere burned out ... But now all of our elementary base nailed electronics for satellites from behind the hill
  8. 0
    12 June 2019 16: 08
    I heard a hypothesis from followers of Blavatsky’s teachings that WE are from there ..
    1. 0
      14 June 2019 17: 11
      Quote: The Siberian Barber
      WE are from there ..
      You? And we are from here fellow
      1. 0
        14 June 2019 19: 09
        laughing drinks good
        Quote: astepanov
        Quote: The Siberian Barber
        WE are from there ..
        You? And we are from here fellow

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"