Gravity weapon. Start delayed

88
To defeat a potential opponent, you need a fundamentally new weaponbased on some new physical principles. Such slogans have been heard for a long time, but have not yet reached their implementation in practice. Among other things, in this area some gravitational weapons are regularly offered. The next mention of such a miracle weapon appeared only a few days ago.


The result of the application of strategic gravitational weapons over the whole planet - through the eyes of science fiction. Photo Starwars.fandom.com




Mysterious grazer


4 June weekly Zvezda spoke about the latest development of Russian scientists, able to change the ways of warfare. Such a system is designated as a generator of gravitational waves; the name grazer is also used. It is curious that the grazer and its unique features were present in the title, however, only a couple of paragraphs were devoted to such weapons, while the rest of the publication was about other products.

It is argued that the grazer using the generated gravitational waves can destroy various objects. At the same time, there are no secondary effects according to the type of contamination of the terrain. How exactly such a system should work is not specified. However, it is clear that while the "generator of gravitational waves" exists only in theory.

Graser is mentioned in the context of V. Leonov's inventions. In recent decades, this inventor and his company have proposed a "theory of superunification" and a "quantum engine" using its principles. The engine was even built and tested. However, the theory and inventions on its basis contradict the well-known picture of the world, and in its favor only dubious calculations and arguments like “scientists have not yet refuted” are cited.

Thus, there is every reason to believe that the grazer described in a recent article is another project of dubious nature that does not have any theoretical justification. The practical perspectives of such an “invention” are obvious.

Weapons of the past


However, the topic of gravitational weapons as one of the versions of the systems “based on new principles” is of great interest. There are reports of several attempts to create such weapons, but none of them led to the desired result. Moreover, one of these stories seems to be a banal hoax.

In various literature on the secrets and secrets of Hitler's Germany, the project of a certain scientist, known under the name or pseudonym Blau, is mentioned repeatedly. In a secret laboratory (according to some data, at one of the concentration camps), he worked on the creation of a tool that hit targets with the help of gravitational rays / waves. This product was supposed to affect the gravitational field of the Earth or create an anti-gravity field. This effect could be used in the air defense system: under the influence of gravitational rays, enemy aircraft were supposed to fall to the ground.

As often happens in stories about the secrets of the Third Reich, no documentary evidence of the existence of Blau and his project has been discovered. In this case, Hitler's gravitational weapons appear exclusively in publications of dubious nature.


Gravitational Bomb of B61. Photo of US Air Force


Curious story in the sphere of gravitational systems took place at the end of the two thousandth. US RUMO became interested in this topic and even issued an order for theoretical and practical work. Studies were commissioned by a private company, GravWave. According to the results of the work, it was required to present a new principle of acceleration of physical objects to high speeds - first of all, the launch of spacecraft was mentioned, but the military use of such methods could not be ruled out.

The basis of the new technology was to be the so-called. Herzenstein effect. It provides for the appearance of gravitational waves during the passage of electromagnetic waves through a static magnetic field. It should be recalled that at that time the existence of gravitational waves was not yet confirmed experimentally. However, in GravWave set to work.

Soon the organization JASON Defense Advisory Group learned about the order of RUMO. She prepared a report recommending that the current work be stopped to avoid wasting. Calculations showed that the gravitational launcher on the Herzenstein effect is extremely inefficient. Even with the use of all the power stations of the planet, such a system could supply the accelerated body with energy of the order of an 0,1 microjoule. To ensure acceleration at the level of 10 m / s2 required astronomical expenditure of energy.

Strong criticism from the scientific community has led to a halt of useless "research." In the future, the Pentagon considered the possibility of studying the notorious new physical principles, but real work in this direction was no longer conducted. Gravitational, geophysical, etc. American military preferred more real lasers and rail guns to weapons.

In our country, too, projects of weapons and other systems using gravitational waves or other not yet mastered phenomena were proposed. However, such proposals are mostly left without the support of serious organizations. This is probably due to a chronic lack of funding, due to which attention has to be paid only to real projects, but not to doubtful projects.

Theory and practice


The concept of a radiating system based on gravity, theoretically suitable for military use, was proposed in the sixties of the last century. At the level of the theory, various constructions of such a device were proposed and studied. In particular, the possibility of creating a special active medium emitting the necessary particles-gravitons was considered. They also studied the possibility of using the interaction of different radiations and fields.

However, over half a century of existence, the concept has not left the stage of theoretical calculations. Its implementation is hampered by a number of factors. First of all, this is an extremely low value of the gravitational constant. Because of this, at the moment it is impossible to form a "gravitational laser beam", as well as measure its parameters.


Gravity anti-submarine ammunition "Zagon-2E". Photo "Research Engineering Institute" / oaoniii.ru


Similar problems exist with the concept of gravitational-wave coupling. A few decades ago, a radio communication alternative using gravitational waves was proposed. However, the implementation of such a proposal is also associated with certain problems. Such waves are difficult to generate, receive and process.

Thus, the idea of ​​using gravitational forces in one form or another in the military sphere has no chance of practical implementation. Scientists all over the world are only studying the nature of gravity. There are serious successes, but it remains only to dream of real weapons or means of communication on such principles.

Modest but real


It is curious that the term "gravitational" is already applied to real ammunition for various purposes. This weapon uses gravity, but targets are defeated by more familiar methods. So, in English terminology, gravitational is often called free falling aviation the bombs. Indeed, Earth's gravity plays a crucial role in moving a bomb from a carrier aircraft to a target.

Domestic arms manufacturers call gravitational special kind of anti-submarine ammunition. Gravitational projectile / bomb is a product with means of homing and without its own power plant. A gravity anti-submarine bomb must search for targets from the surface. When a submarine is detected, the product “dives”, picks up speed due to gravity and maneuvers using the rudders.

The sensation is postponed


Science is advancing and refining the existing picture of the world, with the help of research, theoretical calculations and hypotheses are confirmed. All this lays the foundation for the further development of science and technology, including military. However, in some areas, such a laying of the foundation is very complex. Building real samples on this basis will not be easy or fast either.

It is easy to see that almost all the concepts of weapons “on the basis of new physical principles” encounter similar problems. It has already been established that gravitational weapons are possible only in theory, and their production requires the continuation of research works with an unclear result. For the further development of science and technology, it is necessary to continue basic research and study other new areas, as well as to look for ways to apply the knowledge gained. At the same time, state structures need to exercise some caution in order not to spend money on another “theory of everything” or an invented miracle weapon.
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    11 June 2019 05: 25
    They invented gravity weapons long ago - they threw stones at the head of the enemy! bully
    1. +5
      11 June 2019 05: 56
      We still forgot about gravity toilets on trains.
      1. 0
        12 June 2019 16: 29
        Quote: Login_Off
        We still forgot about gravity toilets on trains.

        There is also plus acceleration and absorption (thermodynamics), but in general it’s not serious to talk about gravitational weapons in general, as long as there is no general theory of gravity.
    2. +4
      11 June 2019 05: 57
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      They invented gravity weapons long ago - they threw stones at the head of the enemy! bully

      and it was efficient and cheap. In the Gaza Strip, Palestinians still use it as a sling.
      1. +4
        11 June 2019 06: 28
        Oh, this Leonov ... Somewhere in the very beginning of the 90s I came across an article in the "Technology of Youth" by one "inventor" -type, - he "thought" about how the May beetle flies, they say, according to all laws , with such a weight, he cannot fly. This "inventor" thought how this beetle flies and made a "discovery" -type, the whole point is precisely in the beetle's chitinous elytra, which, thanks to a peculiar relief from below, create a supporting force in flight when the beetle works with its low-powered wings. Further more - the "inventor", allegedly, built a platform along the profile of the beetle wing flaps and placed a wing at the bottom, operated by a manual drive like a "jumping stick" and .... flew. Yes, yes, he colorfully described his flights in the night sky, over the sleeping city. It’s me, unfortunately, the name of that “inventor” was forgotten over the years .... here, I sit and think, it was not Leonov, so to speak, - at the “beginning of his path as a miracle“ inventor ”. .. winked
        1. -1
          8 July 2019 01: 23
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          Oh, this Leonov ...

          It would be more correct to write: "Oh, this Monster_Fat" wink
          Why write if you don’t remember anything? Here, refresh your memory.
          Gravitoplan Grebennikova V.S.
          http://smirnovs.info/Ufo/Gravitoplan.htm
  2. +1
    11 June 2019 05: 35
    In fact, such a weapon strongly affects the gravitational field of the planet locally at the place of its testing! And the result is either the so-called supergravity, or an increase in the gravitational field at times, or a possible local "zeroing" of gravity, or antigravity! Therefore, such weapons can be used outside the planet's atmosphere in order to primarily avoid the side effects of reconciliation.
  3. +4
    11 June 2019 05: 40
    That's just this topic was discussed again. Well, it’s impossible to create gravity weapons. The author himself does not doubt it. So why raise this topic again?
    1. 0
      8 July 2019 02: 06
      Quote: riwas
      Well, it’s impossible to create gravity weapons.

      Why are you so sure about this?
      Newtonian mechanics does not impose any restrictions on the speed of movement of material objects, but Einstein comes and declares: "The speed of light is the maximum possible in nature." Is that so?
      Any new fundamental physical theory changes picture of the world.

      Consider Einstein's general relativity. There are formulas and they can be interpreted as a kind of "curvature" of space. Just what space is and how it is curved is unknown to anyone. In the presence of such a theory of gravity, the problem of creating artificial gravitational fields resembles the famous fairy tale: "Go there - I don't know where, bring that - I don't know what." lol
      General relativity is an example of a "physical" theory where the physical meaning is completely lost behind mathematics.
      Based only on general relativity, one can safely say: "Gravitational weapons are impossible."

      However, V. Leonov created new fundamental physical theory into which Einstein's general relativity entered as a special case. ChangeIs this theory an existing picture of the world? Of course Yes.
      First of all, this concerns issues of controlling gravity, since space itself is clearly and clearly described and what processes in it cause the phenomenon of gravity.
      In this case, in order to assert that gravitational weapons are impossible, GR alone is not enough, one must also take into account the opinion of the new theory. Therefore, it is necessary to prove that the theory of Superunification is incorrect, since it does not prohibit gravitational weapons, but at the moment serious scientific criticism of the theory of Superunification is simply not exist.
      1. 0
        20 July 2019 21: 47
        Tell me the light getting into a black hole will not get acceleration (or deceleration)?
  4. +3
    11 June 2019 05: 42
    There is a problem.
    The problem lies in ourselves.
    In our property to perceive and analyze information.
    And the fact is that any scientist, if not a genius, is squeezed into the framework of scientific knowledge and dogma.
    Which build a maze for thought.
    And out of this maze, units of millions manage.
    More specifically.
    In order to perceive the picture of the world in full, it is necessary to abstract from generally accepted scientific truths.
    And start looking (and find!) Where no one has ever thought.
    I won’t even hint where and how, in order to avoid unnecessary development of the situation.
    It is scary to imagine the possibility of possessing such a powerful weapon.
    This weapon will create the prerequisites for such a deformation of the consciousness that owns it, that the consequences for all of humanity will be very fatal.
    Thank God that politicians with the help of scientists did not have such opportunities.
    It's early, oh, how early is it for us to get access to what is called the Level of God.
    We are too ugly and terrible creatures to get such a weapon at our disposal.

    I just expressed the thoughts of great scientists of different times accumulated in my mind.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        11 June 2019 06: 07
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        . early, God allowed the monkey to descend from the tree and become a man.

        this old man darwin did ...
      2. +1
        11 June 2019 07: 55
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        Humanity with its reckless actions destroys not only the ecosystem on the planet but also itself ... a parasite on the body of planet Earth.

        Someone from the Great ones compared a person with a virus. And he and the other destroys everything around him for reproduction and survival. It destroys. Compare how much we destroy, every year the "Red Book" "swells" and how much we try to restore.
    2. 0
      11 June 2019 07: 58
      Quote: demo
      We are too ugly and terrible creatures to get such a weapon at our disposal.

      Maybe that's why the Interplanetary Reason is in no hurry to share its knowledge with us.
      It’s the same as giving the child matches and leaving them unattended.
      Destroy everything around you too
      1. +2
        11 June 2019 10: 59
        You are surprisingly right! Therefore, I personally am against the knowledge that we bring to people. But even without giving them, man will destroy himself by destroying the planet as a balanced eco system. In general, people should understand that the hour is not yet near when you will be able to come into contact with developed civilizations directly. Therefore, knowledge comes with messengers in your own way of perception, which you do not perceive as reality
        1. +3
          11 June 2019 12: 05
          You, gridasov, as you develop yourself, less and less associate yourself with people. Do you consider yourself, as it were, a mediator between humans and aliens?
          1. 0
            11 June 2019 14: 56
            Do not raise these questions and will not be shocked by the answers. We are people because this is the optimal form of a rational being within the framework of this planet. But we are no longer the mind people who are associated with intellectual concepts from the past. I would not want to talk about this topic. A person does not always interpret this correctly.
        2. 0
          11 June 2019 12: 52
          Therefore, knowledge comes with messengers in your own way of perceiving


          laughing Hmm, three years ago this computer model called "Gridasov" even looked like a human. Probably, then the programmers did personally interfere in the "scribbling". But the Japanese have created a robot secretary with plasticity, facial expressions, voice and intelligence. Sits at the table and talks. And people only notice the "catch" after 5 minutes. tongue
          1. +1
            11 June 2019 13: 33
            But, you see, it’s interesting to observe how AI self-develops? About 10 years ago it was impossible to imagine ...
            1. 0
              11 June 2019 14: 57
              Indeed, about ten years, and I learned to talk and understand people. And it worked awkwardly.
              1. 0
                11 June 2019 15: 33
                Something I didn’t catch ... Gridasov, are you a bot with AI, an alien or an intermediary?
                Sometimes the truth and "human" language was written here in VO.
                Or are you 10 years old (as you write), "growing up" from schoolboy to student?
                1. 0
                  11 June 2019 17: 52
                  But is it difficult to combine everything. In each period of time, different evolutionary states
                  1. -1
                    11 June 2019 19: 54
                    gridasov
                    Very much about evolution from you, directly operate on a cosmic scale. For 10 years, straight by leaps and bounds .. And which of the evolutionary theories do you hold in your opinion?)
                    And you're not a Schauberger fan anymore? Strange ..
                    1. 0
                      11 June 2019 21: 19
                      As for evolutionary theories, this is identical to the fact that you don’t mention my name in vain. The same is true with theories. We don’t know the goals and objectives of our existence as a species, but what I would say can shock you or you just won’t hear me. You cannot get away from Schauberger - if you take his reasoning and inventions as specifically existing concepts and devices.
        3. 0
          12 June 2019 10: 45
          Quote: gridasov
          But even without giving them, man will destroy himself by destroying the planet as a balanced eco system.

          the planet is not always a balanced eco-system. In the past, there have been events without a person that upset the fragile balance of the system, so the physical processes of the planet themselves affect the system more than a person. Suffice it to say that the planet "gazes" more than mankind and is capable of itself changing the temperature by volcanism, eruptions, no man can do that. throughout history and only in short periods of thaw that something alive can achieve something .. Volcanoes easily compensate for any effect of human "Global Warming"
          Cosmic bodies can also greatly change the planet without humans. We have achieved many of the biological species of the planet, but still we are a 97% biological species serving our body’s mind. The body of the primate.
          Of all the cataclysms that killed the living most - humanity is not in the first place.
          And the Sun and the internal processes of the planet.
          PS.
          Gridasov has emotions. Only in this topic.
          And a certain "Higher mind" if you meet will be without a biological shell. What should we talk to him about? If we are living emotional primates - and actually AI without any emotions there.
          This is worse than meeting Columbus and the natives. This is a meeting of a bulldozer and a tree. An annoying misunderstanding and an insignificant obstacle.
          1. 0
            12 June 2019 11: 03
            What the higher mind suffers? Developed civilizations are deficient in sensory energy. I will not explain how this level is determined mathematically. But the deficit of sensory energy is created by wars, suffering, or by scientifically increasing the level of critical potential of one symmetry system so that the second part of this system will also be expressed by what we call positive feelings of joy, pleasures of righteousness, etc. Therefore, we are needed as long as we feel and are at a certain level of reproduction of this level of energy. I would like to be mistaken.
            1. 0
              12 June 2019 11: 19
              Quote: gridasov
              Developed civilizations lack sensory energy

              they have nothing to spend energy on chemical processes in biological bodies that are useless in terms of creation / production.
              It is better to spend energy on something worthwhile, creating it. Although in essence the creation of something is expansion, expansion is characteristic of a biovid.
              It is difficult to say what the "developed civilization" is thinking - because it is not anthropomorphic! She may not think at all (in the human sense) ...
              and certainly doesn’t suffer. For some chemical processes.
              1. 0
                12 June 2019 12: 36
                You yourself as you want, but I would have done so. For the rest, feed yourself with your own thoughts. And in general, my presence here is not due to idle conversations that lead to nothing.
  5. +3
    11 June 2019 05: 52
    Similar to gravity, but different.
    The village of Galtsovka, Zmeinogorsk district, Altai Territory. November 30, 1984
    "Ball lightning, the size of a soccer ball, flew over the village at a height of two to three tens of meters. The first shed with reinforced concrete pillars on its way was crushed and tumbled down.
    Flying further over a slate-covered apartment building, the CM pulled off the slate along with the nails from the roof of the house (from a surface of the order of several hundred square meters) and lifted all this slate into the air and pulled it along, scattering it throughout the village.
    Flying further over the tractor station, the CMM crushed one frame welded from metal corners and covered with a tarpaulin, and the other frame, when approaching it, first dragged the CMM along the ground: and when the CMM overtook the frame, it was lifted by CMM into the air and moved 300 meters and gently planted on the ground. The weight of the entire frame was at least 100 kg. "
    1. +5
      11 June 2019 06: 00
      The properties of CMM plasma have not yet been fully studied ... what is happening inside of it is completely incomprehensible.
      1. +3
        11 June 2019 06: 08
        The fact that ball lightning contains a powerful charge of electrons, has powerful magnetic fields - this is proved by numerous eyewitness accounts. But there are doubts about the plasma, since ball lightning is stable even in hurricane winds.
        1. +4
          11 June 2019 06: 11
          I don’t understand how CMM can easily penetrate material objects without destroying them. what
          Numerous eyewitness accounts of this ability of this phenomenon put me in a stupor ... science fiction and more.
          1. 0
            11 June 2019 06: 20
            Shakhparonov I.M. got this effect in practice and even issued a certificate of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "VNTITs" N73200500096. Original:

            "When the crystal structure of a substance is exposed to Kozyrev - Dirac (ICD) radiation, a previously unknown effect of the transition of the crystal structure to an amorphous one with violation of the crystallographic long-range order is observed. The difference between order and disorder that exists in nature, as well as the long-term existence of ordered structures, is due to the presence of a fundamental difference in the state of the substance between its crystalline state, on the one hand, and liquid, gaseous, on the other. This state is determined by the presence or absence of rotation of structural particles of matter (nucleons, atoms, molecules, ions). The nature of this difference lies in the following.
            1. Structural elements of a solid - atoms are spatially oriented in the crystal lattice system and fixed in a strictly defined position. Moreover, they possess, as a consequence, high-frequency oscillations near their geometric center and, the interaction between atoms is carried out only at the electrostatic level.
            2. In contrast to crystalline matter, molecules of liquids and gases, in addition to high-frequency vibrations, also possess high-frequency rotation, which is carried out at the electrodynamic level. Previously discovered magnetic monopolies in Kozyrev-Dirac radiation have a powerful magnetic field and the ability to acquire energy due to the external magnetic field of the Earth, as a result of which the magnetic monopole has great penetrating power. Under the influence of a flux of magnetic monopoles on a crystalline substance, its structural elements, atoms transfer the angular momentum of a magnetic monopole. As a result of this, the electrostatic interaction of atoms takes on an additional effect and the atoms transfer to the electrodynamic level of interaction, which leads to their rotational motion. The disorder in the arrangement of the structural particles of matter occurs as a result of the loss of orientation of the magnetic and dipole electric moments of atoms, molecules, and ions. As a result, anisotropically interacting particles arise that form an isotropic medium (amorphous state of a substance, liquid or gaseous phases) in which isotropy is caused not only by the internal vibration of the atom and its chaotic motion, but also by the high-frequency rotation of the atoms themselves, which basically determines the previously mentioned difference order from the mess.
            Laboratory facilities have been developed. "
            1. +3
              11 June 2019 06: 37
              Well then, how do you explain the trajectory of the CMM?
              Is it chaotic or has a meaningful orientation?
              1. +1
                11 June 2019 06: 58
                There is no explanation. But the effect of magnetic fields in objects induced by a powerful magnetic field of ball lightning itself affects.
              2. +2
                11 June 2019 08: 03
                Quote: The same LYOKHA
                Is it chaotic or has a meaningful orientation?

                Yes, there is generally complete darkness.
                According to some evidence chaotic, according to others it is quite reasonable.
                I personally talked with both.
                I never engaged in CMM, but I personally talked to people who saw it. Of course out of curiosity. But for general development or something request
            2. +1
              11 June 2019 17: 22
              Popular presentation of the Certificate of FSUE "VNTITs" No. 73200500096 "The Krivitsky-Shakhparonov effect or the superpermiation effect"
              http://textarchive.ru/c-1128989.html
          2. +3
            11 June 2019 06: 35
            It's simple. Solid (from the point of view of science and man) objects are just the border of the transition between environments with different densities. Like the border between space and atmosphere, like the border between air and water. For objects like ball lightning (and / or UFOs) that use principles of movement that are still incomprehensible to us, the transition between physical media of different densities can be carried out either with meager energy costs, or the density of the medium does not affect at all due to the same physics of the process that we do not understand. Therefore, UFOs and "dive" into the mountains / water / atmosphere without any visible effort.
            1. 0
              12 June 2019 10: 55
              Quote: g1washntwn
              Solid (from the point of view of science and man) objects are just the boundary of the transition between media with different densities. As the border of space and atmosphere, as the border between air and water

              The nature of the surface itself is also a mystery.
              The boundaries of the medium-shell.
              The energy of the surfaces is very significant.
          3. +1
            11 June 2019 10: 41
            Very simple! A person perceives a CMM as a static object, and this is a dynamic system in which magnetic force flows form a breakdown at the contact of the external shell of the system. Therefore, when it is compressed in the stream, and therefore redistributes its shape, but not its potential, it is capable of compression and expand. while maintaining the overall energy process, i.e. it can be compared with the river flowing in a wide channel and shallow depths and in a narrow one with the same potential and throughput.
        2. 0
          8 July 2019 02: 23
          Quote: riwas
          CMM tore off along with nails slate from the roof of the house
          ...
          ball lightning contains a powerful charge of electrons, has powerful magnetic fields - this is proved by numerous eyewitness accounts.

          Likely to manage magnetic fields alone will not succeed.
          Maybe it makes sense to pay attention to the theory of V. Leonov and alternating electromagnetic fields? http://leonovpublitzistika.blogspot.com/2018/10/1-2017.html
          Reviewed by Academician D.S. Strebkova to the book: V.S. Leonov. Quantum energy. Volume 1. Theory of Superunification, St. Petersburg, 2017.
          Nowadays, few people know, but the foundation of the theory of Superunification was laid down by him in graduate school, when he discovered the effect of attraction by the bifilar winding of both magnetic and non-magnetic particles. Subsequently, the bifilar winding was used in dielectric separators to separate fine particles of loose mixtures, in particular, to isolate biologically valuable seeds in strong electromagnetic fields.
      2. 0
        11 June 2019 07: 59
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        The properties of CMM plasma have not yet been fully studied ... what is happening inside of it is completely incomprehensible.

        Where does a solid "white spot" come from and where does it disappear?
        1. 0
          11 June 2019 10: 45
          No spots for a long time. There is no popularization of an expanded worldview. A person wants to create a thermonuclear reactor, and does not try to interpret the mechanics of a device as a simple breakdown in a wire with voltage and current. In general, he does not bother to understand why a plasma breakdown in a circuit is associated with an increase in power in this circuit.
          1. 0
            11 June 2019 21: 31
            Quote: gridasov
            He doesn’t try to transform as a simple breakdown in a wire with voltage and current the mech devices into effective positive power.

            - Gridasov, there is no such thing as "breakdown in the wire." In the electrical sense, the word "breakdown" is combined with words such as insulator, dielectric, PP junction, vacuum.
            So your synthetic phrase just doesn't make sense. Apart from what you could have invested in it, using the nonexistent concept of "breakdown in the wire".
            - And yes, there are a lot of grammatical errors in your texts ...
            1. 0
              11 June 2019 22: 16
              It is always interesting to hear that there is no such thing and probably a phenomenon as a breakdown of the electronic magnetic circuit. I agree about the mistakes, but laziness was born before me. And do not ask to edit the texts I will not
              1. 0
                12 June 2019 03: 32
                Yeah
                Quote: gridasov
                breakdown in a wire

                и
                Quote: gridasov
                breakdown of the magnetic circuit

                you have the same thing.
                The inventor of the terminology "we sing a song"!

                Gridasov, you are nevertheless more careful with the terminology.

                And by the way, why did it surrender to you
                Quote: gridasov
                transform a simple breakdown in a wire with voltage and current into the effective positive power of the fur devices
                ?
                In normal language, electric motors can transform electrical energy into mechanical energy with a very high efficiency.
                1. 0
                  12 June 2019 09: 10
                  I am not talking in this case about the formation of the density of magnetic fluxes through densification of winding and other methods. I'm talking about the moment of spark breakdown between the phase and neutral wires. Therefore, the conversation is not about the method of choosing terminology, but about the essence of the physical process.
                  1. 0
                    8 July 2019 02: 41
                    Quote: gridasov
                    about the essence of the physical process.

                    Dear Gridasov, I completely agree with the opinion of Zaits (Yuri). You do not write notes for yourself, but try to tell other people some information. Excessively free handling of words and technical terms significantly complicates the understanding of your texts.
                    Agree that the term "wire breakdown" is not clear to an unprepared reader.
                    Here the "spark breakdown of insulation between the phase and neutral wire" gives much more accurate information about the essence of the physical process.
                    Try to write so that your text is clear not only to you personally, but to any other educated person.
                    Otherwise, what's the point of writing comments?
    2. +2
      11 June 2019 06: 03
      Any natural phenomenon that we observe is perceived by us only through the prism of knowledge.
      The more knowledge, the better we understand this or that phenomenon.
      But understanding the phenomena and using the forces that brought to life this phenomenon is a long distance.
      When you look at the blazing lightning in a thunderstorm, it is breathtaking.
      And you understand how small and frail you are in comparison with these forces.
      But when you understand that these forces are insignificant even in the face of forces influencing the planet, then not only your hands will drop.
      And further upward.
      BUT strangely enough, the greatest forces are contained in the energy of the nucleus.
      The ratio of mass and energy of interaction in relation to space objects does not go into any comparison.
      This is where the main component of the modern world is laid.
      The possessor of intra-atomic forces owns the World.
      1. 0
        12 June 2019 11: 01
        Quote: demo
        When you look at the blazing lightning in a thunderstorm, it is breathtaking.
        And you understand how small and frail you are in comparison with these forces.
        But when you understand that these forces are insignificant even in the face of forces influencing the planet, then not only your hands will drop.

        Well, we are just a species and millions of years have been it. And recently acquired knowledge. First of all, instincts and emotions speak in us .. And the mind is somewhere there .. in the backyards.
        Therefore, all sharp events are instinctive fear, danger, escape, escape, hide, survive. Man survived through instincts. And society.
        And everything else we pass through ourselves. Anthropomorphic world, faith, events (we let everything through ourselves) .. so the world was known.
        And the world is not anthropomorphic. And to understand this, we are changing attitudes ... progress.
        So in order to learn new things, you need to be less human and an emotional machine (although all that drives us is animal curiositylaughing without it, we would not have achieved anything at all!
        what's the next corner? This is how we are developing. Overcoming and looking into a secret.
        1. 0
          12 June 2019 15: 56
          I hope that I will write now, you will understand.
          The study of the world around us over the past 100 years has brought us discoveries more than for the entire remaining period of the existence of our species.
          But there remains one corner of research, completely unknown and not understood - our brain.
          And even more mysterious and intangible, not amenable to any research - foresight, insight, prediction. Those. absolutely not rational, from the point of view of the mind, the manifestation of the completely unique capabilities of our brain.
          To see what he could not see under any circumstances. See the world through the eyes of a different species. Receive direct knowledge completely from "nowhere".
          This is both annoying and inspiring.
          I think that our biological species has mutational perspectives that could further develop a more intellectually developed species than homo sapiens.
          If until this moment we don’t bother each other.
          1. 0
            12 June 2019 23: 23
            Quote: demo
            But there remains one corner of research, completely unknown and not understood - our brain.

            the brain is still an instrument of nature.
            It is completely evolutionarily formed and acting according to the needs of the body.
            The mind serves the body.
          2. +1
            14 June 2019 16: 42
            "But one corner of the study remains,
            completely unexplored and not understood - our brain "////
            ----
            With the structure of the brain just once in recent decades sorted out
            very detailed. From the moment we learned around 2000
            connect nerve endings and electrical wires, experiments
            with the brain became very clear and strict.
            The riddle of the work of "processors" (there are many of them), memory - more or less cleared up.
            But predictions, insights, intuition - there are many mysteries,
            Because here some external fields associated with the brain interfere.
            The brain in these cases works like a radio and a radio transmitter.
            There are no breakthroughs in this area yet.
            1. 0
              14 June 2019 20: 23
              And thank God.
              1. +1
                15 June 2019 13: 26
                Perhaps you `re right.
                There are clear benefits and hidden great benefits in brain research.
                danger.
                Benefits: 1) in the treatment of many diseases,
                2) to help people with disabilities - direct
                communication of the brain through wires and wi-fi with prostheses of arms and legs.
                (if a person’s spinal cord is paralyzed, for example).
                Danger: zombies, cyborgs, etc.
                1. 0
                  15 June 2019 15: 01
                  Your brain works great.
                  From my short wish you were able to draw voluminous conclusions.
                  Keep it up.
    3. +2
      11 June 2019 12: 10
      I was lucky to see ball lightning. When I was a teenager.
      She flew evenly and directly above the surface of the Gulf of Finland parallel to the shore. Flying a few hundred meters with a slight explosion disappeared. Thick yellow-red ball. Size is difficult to estimate. Around a soccer ball ...
    4. 0
      11 June 2019 20: 34
      The village and a residential building with a roof (a few hundred square meters), my God, a 3-room apartment with corridors and a toilet has 100-120 sq. M and this is only a wall but not a ceiling. On the roof-roof, 20-35 sq. M. And what a few hundred square meters of the roof of a residential building in a VILLAGE can be demolished by lightning. God, what a nonsense, Yes, there are no such houses (residential) in the village because the garden and other embers and, as a result, the log house, Never build such houses in the village. It's a lie quote about lightning because there are no such houses in the village and nobody will build them, several hundred torn slate roofs of one Residential building in the Galtsovka Village of Altai Territory (funny, but I live in a couple of hundred kilometers from it and I know this village at a time) , Sorry, this is a bom the size of the Luzhniki Stadium, it turns out that you’ve ever seen anything like this in a village, all over the world. So the race is for lightning and slate, and specifically it is a village in Altai.
      1. 0
        11 June 2019 21: 44
        Quote: evgen1221
        So the race is for lightning and slate, and specifically it is a village in Altai.

        Today is Tuesday Friday. Today is possible.
  6. +2
    11 June 2019 06: 10
    You don't have to go far, we fly on jet propulsion, not anti-gravity (rough) engines. Science naturally digs, but "TE" say and are surprised, they say, creating it is very simple and wonder why we still cannot create it (articles from the so-called contactees of witnesses).
    1. +1
      11 June 2019 07: 06
      Not so long ago, We flew only from the bell tower and straight down, and now we are discussing the flight of spacecraft to Mars as routine. But it is hardly useful to dwell on the practical application of science and knowledge to please globalists and consumption - without new problems, hypotheses and theories, knowledge is dead. The bystander contactees paradigm tells them antigravity is easy, but none of them have soared off the ground yet smile
      1. +1
        11 June 2019 07: 46
        Everything is true, only the contactees are within limits, they are ordinary witnesses, many of whom are liars.
        1. +1
          11 June 2019 10: 55
          Even more of those who in their own world of illusions are not able to figure out what reality is and what fantasy is.
    2. 0
      11 June 2019 10: 48
      Jet thrust flying, as well as the operation of all devices on the potential energy of substances causing impulse and fur movement, must be considered as a process of electronic magnetic interactions. Then the effective effectiveness of inventions will be much higher
  7. +1
    11 June 2019 06: 44
    The people, since they touched on the topic of weapons on new physical. principles, can someone tell me? In the 90s I looked thin. film: there, it seems, Germans used acoustic weapons in World War I (or against Germans) - people turned into porridge. What kind of movie is this?
    1. +1
      11 June 2019 10: 25
      I have not seen such a movie.
      But if you imagine a person as a vessel filled with liquid (and this is so), then generate a sound wave that will create a certain imbalance in the movement of molecules in the particles of matter, which can either slow down or accelerate linear motion.
      Sound-acoustic washing machines as an example.
      The problem is that soldiers do not run naked.
      The presence of clothing, metal parts of ammunition, weapons, etc. will "break" the sound wave.
      Or create a wave of such power that it even breaks through the tank.
      But the power will be terrible.
      And the installation is not too mobile.
      Those. dead end.
      Not rational.
  8. +2
    11 June 2019 09: 05
    It is strange that the Gridasov bot, so far, has not been noted in this topic. This is his patrimony.
    1. +1
      11 June 2019 10: 52
      What is this oddity? The fact that you have the opportunity to hear the rationale for a slightly different vision of processes. This is a smart chance to catch a thread.
      1. 0
        11 June 2019 11: 28
        So I'm waiting for the comments of a specialist in this field
    2. 0
      11 June 2019 10: 57
      Already noted above, you missed something hi
  9. 0
    11 June 2019 16: 14
    The author has some kind of mess in my head! How ammunition Corral-2 became gravitational to me personally is not clear. Or the author knows that so far all the scientific institutions of the world cannot determine. Namely, to catch the wave of gravity.
    1. 0
      20 July 2019 21: 36
      I wanted to write an answer, it turned out too well, I'll keep it a secret))) there is a way to feel gravity, a hint: ordinary matter (atom) does not cope badly with this
  10. +1
    11 June 2019 17: 18
    It has already been established that gravitational weapons are possible only in theory
    Is it already established that it is possible? I would like to know who it is and how it has already been established ... at least "only in theory"? Besides Gridasov?
  11. -2
    11 June 2019 17: 50
    You can, of course, laugh at the oddities-pro-professors, but ... what is wonderful and absurd today suddenly becomes obvious and attainable tomorrow. Gravity exists, it is one of the types of fields, poorly studied so far, most likely the result of the dualism of gravitational waves and gravitons, and if a physical phenomenon exists and is studied, sooner or later, a possible application will be discovered. And in this case, the first users to line up the military, well, as always.
    1. 0
      12 June 2019 17: 27
      Only a few days ago they published in a scientific journal that gravity is a weak interaction of elementary particles of dark matter with matter.
      1. -2
        14 June 2019 03: 22
        You confirm my forecasts, but I'm afraid the ears of war are already at the top of the head, and every new weapon is deadlier than the previous one.
  12. 0
    11 June 2019 18: 32
    All this in such an embryo as electricity in the 18th century.
    1. +1
      12 June 2019 11: 11
      Quote: Grandfather Eugene
      All this in such an embryo as electricity in the 18th century.

      electricity for several millennia.
      There is even less. This is more complicated all the same.
      The authors of the publication also talk about the "quantum engine" developed by Vladimir Leonov. By the way, Leonov is recognized as the "father of the theory of non-reactive movement in unsupported space." The achievements of this scientist are what creates new perspectives for the creation of weapons of the future.
      It must be recalled that the theories of Leonov in the Soviet Union were not accepted. The scientist was called a charlatan. At the same time, in the USA and China, allegedly, his projects were successfully used.
      Let's see what they find out at Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire
      1. -1
        8 July 2019 03: 22
        Quote: Antares
        By the way, Leonov is recognized as "the father of the theory of non-reactive motion in unsupported space."

        I want to correct you a little. Talking about the unsupported space as applied to V. Leonov’s engines is not entirely true. From the point of view of modern physics, unsupported (cosmic) space is, but speaking of V. Leonov’s theory of Superunification and quantum engines, unsupported space is an abstraction that does not exist in nature. According to this theory, space is a superhard and superelastic material environment on which you can very much rely.
        http://quanton.ru/scientific-discoveries/

        The scientist was called a charlatan.

        Currently does not exist serious scientific criticism of the theory of Superunification, but there are positive reviews from competent people.
        So it would be nice to add who calls V. Leonov a charlatan. For the most part, these are poorly educated people who poorly understand even school physics. Absolutely not understanding the essence of open and closed physical systems, they shout about an alleged violation of the laws of nature. They, by their stupidity, try to apply laws that are valid only for closed physical systems to open systems.
        I will give a very simple example. Consider a sailing boat as a closed physical system. This means that there is only a boat and only a sail, nothing else. But sometimes a real boat even very well floats and at the same time the laws of nature are naturally violated (we don’t consider the wind, having decided that the system is closed).
        Obviously, in the case Violations laws of nature, valid only for closed systems, we have a system open and you just need to carefully figure out which one "wind"blows in this system.
        1. 0
          8 July 2019 10: 01
          Scientists do not understand the principles of interaction of various structures of space, and especially at the level of elementary particles. There is no understanding of the continuity of space. There is no understanding of fractality and the vector of oadial interactions. Hence, there is no understanding that the primitive so-called material particle is not the particle itself, but a dipole formed simply by a mirror-mounted monopole. In any case, this is drawn in the pictograms in the margins. The depth of understanding of what is presented as magnetic fluxes is apparently not given to us at all. But even this is more sufficient to further argue that all interactions are realized precisely and only through magnetic fluxes. But then the whole description of these interactions can be carried out through the number and their properties expressed through their function of constant value and nothing more. That is, there is a real interaction process and there is a mechanism for its description. In the final analysis, therefore, unsupported motion is movement at the level of interaction of magnetic force processes.
          1. 0
            8 July 2019 14: 27
            Quote: gridasov
            dipole formed simply by a mirror-mounted monopole

            You are 50% percent right. Extend this idea a little to the space itself. Let the whole space be very densely packed with the smallest particles of weightless matter. Each particle contains a magnetic dipole formed by two opposite (S and N) magnetic quarks / monopoles. For symmetry, add to the magnetic dipole an electric dipole formed by two oppositely charged electric charges (+ e and -e). Now we have a minimal particle of space, if you like a quantum of space, consisting of two mutually perpendicular magnetic and electric dipoles. At large distances, the quanta of space are electrically and magnetically neutral, but at small distances between them super-powerful attractive forces act. For this reason, space has an ultrahigh density and is superelastic to allow light to have a very high propagation speed. Such a design easily allows you to describe любые electromagnetic processes. All four fundamental forces of nature are quite simply explained by electromagnetic processes in our superhard and superelastic space. This is a very convenient and beautiful model of the structure of the world.
            Details on the website http://quanton.ru/scientific-discoveries/

            PS Of course, all magnetic processes can be reduced to moving electric charges.
            It is also possible to explain all electrical phenomena only through magnetic fluxes.
            All this is possible, but for the sake of having such problems.
            Usually a simpler theory turns out to be more correct.
            V. Leonov’s Theory of Superunification impresses with its versatility and unique simplicity.
            Only four a quark with whole charges to describe the entire diversity of our world!
            1. 0
              8 July 2019 15: 26
              Nevertheless, I believe that electrical processes are derivatives of magnetic interactions. In addition, starting from the dipole interaction, all processes develop as fractal. Moreover, the function of the number expressed in its constant value allows us to build space in the literal sense identical to the construction of numbers — inextricably, intactorally algorithmic in relationships and potential in relationships. I already repeatedly repeat that starting from a dipole we have a dimension, and if there is a dimension, then the polarization including not only monopole and dipole, but also the dimension corresponding to all numbers. In general, you can not use words to describe the number of space.
              1. -1
                8 July 2019 19: 48
                Quote: gridasov
                Nevertheless, I believe that electrical processes are derivatives of magnetic interactions.

                I'm not trying to drag you into my "faith" at all.
                You see, you can describe the real world in Russian, but you can also in English. The texts will be completely different, but they will correctly (I hope so) describe the realities of the world.
                It is quite possible to consider physical theories as different "languages" for describing the real world. Some languages ​​are simpler and more convenient, others less so.
                For example, compare the theory of Ptolemy's epicycles and the theory of Copernicus. Ptolemy's epicycles quite accurately described all the features of the motion of planets in the vault of heaven, but life has shown that the theory of Copernicus describes the motion of celestial bodies more simply and better.
                I just inform you that there is another, very nice physical theory and I suggest you get to know it better. The choice of which theory to use remains with you.
  13. 0
    8 July 2019 20: 31
    I choose all theories. I work with any information, up to a critical level of perception. All theories also line up in the system. Therefore, it is most likely worth talking first about the application of the method of working with large or capacious information data, and only then talking about theory. I still can not say that there is a method that allows you to analyze a complex of physical processes, even on the surface of the propeller blades. We did it. Therefore, to say that other methods would be productive would be premature.
    1. -1
      9 July 2019 15: 04
      Quote: gridasov
      to analyze the complex of physical processes, even on the surface of the propeller blades.

      The approach to choosing the appropriate theory is quite normal.
      But you mentioned the rotor blades and I had a question.
      When analyzing any phenomenon, we take into account the most significant components and completely abstract from small, irrelevant details. Any analysis for this reason is incomplete.
      Question: in your analysis, did the inertia forces arising in the surface layers of the blade be taken into account? Was it taken into account that the forces of inertia are of the same nature as the forces of gravity? According to the theory of V. Leonov, a deformation of the quantum density of space arises on the surface of the blade upon its contact with anything, which is the reason for the appearance of inertia forces.
  14. 0
    20 July 2019 21: 14
    Ha ha, it’s quite possible to create a gravitational weapon, since the earth creates gravity and it is quite real and tangible by everyone - why is it impossible! if it has not already been created and is not classified under the stamp! need a high velocity shell, then what process generates gravity and then ..... secret))) scientists will taste what is the point !!! you don’t have to rack your brains here, physics is based on the simplest principles, by the way, all atoms have their own gravity, we look at what processes in the atom lead to this, like two or two)) if you go deeper, then gravity and inertia are different processes
  15. 0
    28 August 2019 21: 03
    The best gravitational weapon is an iron from the 12th floor! ...
  16. 0
    21 October 2020 16: 18
    The author needs not only to select material, but also to delve into its essence deeper, or at least collect more information. What you wrote in the article speaks about your not deep knowledge of the topic of the theory of quantum gravity. Today it is already practically accepted by the scientific world, or, at least, has not been refuted by anyone. There is no official criticism. Pilot installations are also working. Therefore, it is enough to simply assume that in the future, quantum mechanics will help not only in the creation of flying vehicles, but also of new generation weapons. The working prototype is based on the Superunification theory of the Russian physicist and mechanic Vladimir Leonov.
    The seventy-year-old scientist, laureate of the Russian Government Prize is already called the father of the theory of non-reactive motion in the space vacuum, on March 3, 2018, he conducted public tests of his brainchild - KvD-1-2009 with horizontal and vertical thrust. The results, to put it mildly, stunned the scientific commission, which includes such respected people in the scientific world as Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor Georgy Kostin, member of the Expert Council of the State Duma Defense Committee, Lieutenant General Mikhail Sautin, Honored Tester of Space Technology of RSC Energia Alexander Kubasov and many other very, very respected researchers and scientists.
    A prototype made in Russia developed, in the presence of a high commission, a minimum specific thrust force of about 115 N / kW! For comparison: the best examples of modern rocket technology are not able to produce a specific force in excess of 0,7 N / kW.
    It turns out that the device, which is unprecedented in its nature of creating thrust, works 165 times more efficiently than the jet engine used by the modern space industry.
    In 2021, tests in space are scheduled, after the technical part is finalized and energy recovery becomes possible, the product will be able to "produce" a specific force of more than 1.000 N / kW, that is, 1.428 times more efficient than that of a liquid-propellant jet engine.
    I was very surprised by the inept review of this topic from Kiril Ryabov .. Usually, unlike other special correspondents of the Military Review, his reviews are more realistic and competent.