The deadlines for the development of the A300 rocket for the Belarusian Polonaise-M have been announced

44
The Armed Forces of Belarus are preparing for future deliveries of an upgraded version of the MLRS Polonez-M. The system, together with the upgraded tactical ammunition A300, was once again presented at the arms exhibition. We are talking about the exhibition MILEX-2019.

The deadlines for the development of the A300 rocket for the Belarusian Polonaise-M have been announced




The development of Polonaise-M by Belarus is carried out jointly with a foreign partner. At the same time, there is no official information about who exactly is engaged in cooperation in the creation of this rocket launcher. It is assumed that we are talking about China.

The development of an upgraded version of the A300 rocket for the Polonaise-M will be completed, allegedly, by the 2021 year. In this regard, it becomes obvious that in a fully updated version of the MLRS for the AF of the Republic of Belarus will be purchased no earlier than 2021 of the year.

Recall that in the 2017, the test of ammunition for the Polonez in the Gomel region showed its ability to hit targets at a distance of almost 300 km. More specifically - 298,5 km. Initially it was reported that the target's range is 200 km. But then it was about the A200 rocket. Increased figures gave food for thought about modernization, which can significantly increase the capabilities of the MLRS.

Belarusian developers note that the new rocket is being designed taking into account its increased maneuverability. Also, the speed of its flight will be higher than its predecessor. The probability of a circular deviation from the target will be less than 30 m.

It should be noted that today the initial versions of the MLRS "Polonez" are in service with the armies of Belarus and Azerbaijan.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    44 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      9 June 2019 11: 28
      300km? Is it possible to attach special warheads too? But doesn’t plan to supply Butsk to Ukraine? Something of questions immediately arises to the prospects of this device what
      1. -4
        9 June 2019 11: 30
        Here is something else interesting. The MZKT, which is engaged in tractors for the military, apparently is still trying to twitch and stay afloat. But the Belarusian MAZ plant is so uncompetitive that we don't even want to buy (the plant itself, in the sense) A couple of years ago we did not want to negotiate - now " don't complain " laughing
        More and more "stability" begins to panic
        1. +6
          9 June 2019 11: 37
          Quote: Subergeil
          MZKT apparently still trying to twitch and stay afloat

          But is this a crime or not decent?
          Quote: Subergeil
          But MAZ we don’t even want to buy))

          Strange, here we have buses driving around the city with the inscription MAZ
          1. +1
            9 June 2019 11: 41
            So we have MAZ buses in Rostov-on-Don, only according to rumors, we rented them with the right to buy, and some of the buses were given by Belarusians for some sort of Russian debt to Belarus! hi
        2. +3
          9 June 2019 11: 49
          MZKT is also not a fountain. For profitability, you need something around the 300 chassis to collect per year. And only Russia could provide such an order. But no longer wants.
          1. +1
            9 June 2019 11: 56
            MZKT is also not a fountain. For profitability, you need something around the 300 chassis to collect per year. And only Russia could provide such an order. But no longer wants.


            And it is interesting in principle - how this plant will be bent
            Those. Russia is generally the only and unique customer
            But they did not agree, and there all the balls about the delivery of wheeled vehicles in the whole world were reduced to one-time deliveries.
        3. +3
          9 June 2019 11: 51
          And even if they did buy it? What, would they invest in production? What happened to the ZiL .. Is there a queue behind these MAZs?
          1. -1
            10 June 2019 05: 27
            So, that's the only thing you need with ointment. There is Kamaz and Ural. And all sorts of krazy and maz should become history. According to the principle said by Taras Bulba: "I gave birth to you, I will kill you."
        4. +7
          9 June 2019 15: 25
          MZKT is engaged not only in tractors for the military, although "Topol" and "Yarsy" have traveled and still drive on transporters developed and produced by MZKT. This time. The problem of MAZ and the Minsk Tractor Plant (MTZ) is that these factories were once built for the mass production of cars and tractors for the national economy of the entire USSR. The products of these factories were supplied to all the CMEA countries and even to some capital cities, including Finland, Australia, etc. the ratio of price and quality of these products satisfied even the capricious Western buyer. Naturally, when the main market for these machines, i.e. The USSR collapsed, then it became incredibly difficult to keep these and many other Belarusian enterprises afloat, It also became difficult to maintain sales markets in cap countries. Nevertheless, the Belarusians did not panic and did everything to ensure that the main enterprises of the Belarusian industry survived and not only survived, but also brought income to the state. And we are talking not only about MAZ and MTZ, but also about dozens of other design bureaus, research institutes and factories of Belarus. Thanks to this, the Belarusians received pus and modest but salaries, pensioners, pensions and war veterans, the benefits they were entitled to, even when the Russians were sitting for many months without salaries and without pensions. Yes, there were repeated attempts on the part of the Russian oligarchy to buy up on the cheap the most tasty morsels of the Belarusian industry. But then they, the oligarchs, did not break off. So why endlessly roll barrels to Belarus? After all, Russia does not have many allies left whose people really treat Russians like brothers. Or Russia considers Syria, Iran, Turkey, India, Venezuela and the like to be more loyal allies. So these allies, at the first opportunity, will sell Russia to those who pay them more for it, as Egypt once sold. The fact that Belarus has its own point of view on what happened between Russia and Ukraine is its right as a sovereign state, especially since in these adventures Russia has a stigma in the gun. For example, if Russia worked more carefully with Poroshenko's predecessors and did not rely on a number of Poroshenko's predecessors, including the former convict and coward Yanukovych, and the "big Russian politician" V. Surkov would not try to tame the Maidan by force, then most likely everything in Ukraine would be calmed down and she would not have rushed under the wing of NATO. After all, nationalists such as Bandera have always been in Ukraine. And the leadership of the USSR, realizing that punitive actions against them did not give anything, managed to somehow come to an agreement with the Banderaites, declare an amnesty for them and thereby end the great terror that they staged after the war in Western Ukraine. Similar methods were used to restore order in Chechnya. Someone was forgiven, someone was paid, and so far it's quiet. What I mean, but to the fact that Newton's Law of Action and Reaction is very universal. More pressure, more resistance.
          Returning to Belarus, I would like to ask the especially zealous guardians of "Russia's national interests" to remember that other states also have their own national interests and, if possible, respect them. The union state and the controlled state are two big differences, as they say in the free city of Odessa and not only in it
          1. -1
            10 June 2019 05: 34
            What independence? There are only interests of Russia, and everything else, if RUSSIA allows it a bit. To live at the expense of Russia and to spoil it at the threshold is your independence? And if you break all economic ties with this miracle of state ownership, how long will this independence last? I was born and raised in Smolensk region, not far from the border, and I know the price of Belarusian friendship.
            1. 0
              11 June 2019 11: 07
              Is it possible for us to breathe without your permission, venerable Gennady?
              And with "shit under the threshold" is also a big question. It seems that you and your like-minded "patriety" are more crap Russia themselves than someone from the outside.
              Well, Russia will sever all ties with the outside world and what will it do? After all, even natural resources need to be sold to someone. After all, you will not drink oil and sniff gas, and no, as far as I know, in the Smolensk region there are special reserves of these resources.
              And the last. About national interests. There is a very competent opinion that the national interests of ANY state are nothing but the selfish interests of those in power in a given state. And in this regard, I do not see the fundamental differences between Russia and Belarus. Yes, there are variations, but not fundamental. In general, there is a proposal to make an Sha in relation to Belarus, as someone Gotsman used to say in a well-known series and drive into his brain that it is not at your level to decide the relations between the two allied states. Yes, pubs! hi
        5. -2
          10 June 2019 05: 23
          Thank God, our auto industry of the freight standards is functioning, + we are trying in every possible way to efficiently develop our multiaxial equipment and quite successfully. I don’t understand the other way how and who allows them to develop competitive equipment and weapons, instead of strangling it all in a mess. So that there is a direct dependence in everything on the Russian Federation and even seditious thoughts do not arise. Who in general allowed them so much independence?
      2. +2
        9 June 2019 11: 49
        It was never planned to install a special warhead. Belarus does not have nuclear weapons. But on the issue of real installation thereof, this is to China, since this is their rocket.
        1. +4
          9 June 2019 12: 38
          In general, the dubious thing turns out: MLRS, but with a range of tactical missiles. With such a range (taking into account the deviation, the mass and dimensions of the rocket, which should fly 300 km.), Such a MLRS does not provide a decent density of fire. The installation of corrected warheads deprives the MLRS of its main advantage over tactical missiles - the low cost of a salvo. It is still doubtful that it is cheaper to throw 8 warheads per 300 km with 8 different missiles or one multiple warhead of warheads of the same mass of one missile (GOS is definitely cheaper than the second, for engines too). It remains that the niche of the counter-battery fight against the enemy forces tightly covered by tactical air defense? But such and tactical or cruise missiles are not a pity.
          1. +1
            9 June 2019 13: 39
            So the installation was created not for practical reasons, but on the command of the Old Man. For Russia has wonders, and Belarus has nothing. They’ve done as directed, and now they’ll think about what needs to adapt. According to the mind, initially it was necessary to cooperate with Russia, then they did not receive a missile with low performance characteristics. I understand that someone won’s ambitions, but it’s sad that there were no people in the circle to point out the mistakes — they are afraid for their back-warmed places.
            1. 0
              10 June 2019 07: 36
              Quote: viralig
              According to the mind, initially it was necessary to cooperate with Russia, then they did not receive a missile with low performance characteristics

              What for? Worked with the Chinese? Well done. I think today we have an idea of ​​the directions and level of Chinese technical thought in this direction. This is not said out loud, but it must be borne in mind that the developers of military equipment, ours and Belarus, in similar circumstances, exchange information and samples. I see no reason for the commotion. An information channel on Chinese technologies has appeared. Do you think that Si, walking with Putin around Peter at night, will tell everything himself? Under low performance characteristics, what weapons do you mean?
              Quote: viralig
              I understand that somebody’s ambitions

              Or maybe the thought flew a little further than yours? Can't you imagine this?
        2. 0
          9 June 2019 18: 15
          so in the article rch about the rocket to increase the range of the complex, and it is Chinese
      3. +4
        9 June 2019 16: 08
        IL-18, what is "bam"? If you want to write in Belarusian, then "father".
        1. 0
          9 June 2019 18: 19
          Well, I'm not a Belarusian, I'm sorry. There is no great power chauvinism here. hi
      4. +1
        9 June 2019 19: 22
        You can send an official request with your questions. they will not answer here
    2. +1
      9 June 2019 11: 45
      That Belarusians began to break a niche in the global arms market! So with time, together with the Chinese, they will survive us from their arms market!
    3. -1
      9 June 2019 12: 03
      Recall that in the 2017, the test of ammunition for the Polonez in the Gomel region showed its ability to hit targets at a distance of almost 300 km. More specifically - 298,5 km. Initially it was reported that the target's range is 200 km. But then it was about the A200 rocket. Enlarged showed gave food for thought about modernization, which can significantly enhance the capabilities of the MLRS.


      But in general it is not clear why the Belarusians are engaged in this canoe.
      For their army this is superfluous.
      Who will target them to 300 km ??
      Neither aviation nor satellites they have
      Or will they hit major settlements?

      To cover these missile systems need air defense systems
      which they have not really.
      And the army as a whole does not shine
      So the idea of ​​worn with these MRLS - very strange.

      The Chinese are certainly necessary.
      But the Belarusians-it is not clear why.

      It is clear that Lukashenka needs to be shown - here we are so cool,
      modern weapons do
      In fact, given the state of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus, these complexes are a silly provocation, no more
      For the defense of the country, zero sense from them, and in order to cover their cities, the Poles will endure them immediately and tightly ...
      1. +3
        9 June 2019 12: 09
        Olezhek, well, drones can give them a central control over a secure channel! And this "baida" is already being sold by them to other countries! For this is a lucrative business - the arms business!
        1. -3
          9 June 2019 18: 21
          Olezhek - well, they can receive drones via a secure channel


          Also Belarusian-Chinese?

          And this "baida" is already being sold by them to other countries!


          To other countries is Azerbaijan?
          And not so much for sale as thanks to Lukashenko for anti-Armenian
          position on Karabakh

          I! For this profitable business is the weapon business!


          For serious manufacturers with their powerful research and production
          base
          But not for RB
      2. 0
        9 June 2019 12: 51
        Quote: Olezhek
        But in general it is not clear why the Belarusians are engaged in this canoe.
        For their army this is superfluous.
        Who will target them to 300 km ??

        Sell, for example. Those who will buy. At least China, at least Poland, at least Ukraine. We will be happy to sell to Russia at a discount, especially if all the products are bought up. Business, however.
        They say nothing about special warheads, but stuffing low-power charges into the volume of a conventional warhead is not a problem for those who produce nuclear weapons. Then the deviation of 30 m is "an exact hit in the epicenter".
        1. -2
          9 June 2019 18: 22
          Those who will buy. Although China


          Chinese missiles ?? belay
          1. 0
            10 June 2019 07: 19
            Quote: Olezhek
            Those who will buy. Although China


            Chinese missiles ?? belay

            Not. Installation.
            1. 0
              10 June 2019 18: 25
              Not. Installation.


              Native, the Chinese took with MZKT all the information of interest.
              (But father rasstaralsya for friends)
              tractors or installations based on MZKT (with their missiles!)
              they will not buy in serious quantities.
              China will do everything himself.
              1. 0
                10 June 2019 18: 58
                Quote: Olezhek
                Not. Installation.


                Native, the Chinese took with MZKT all the information of interest.
                (But father rasstaralsya for friends)
                tractors or installations based on MZKT (with their missiles!)
                they will not buy in serious quantities.
                China will do everything himself.

                Surely. All acquired by overwork was given to the Chinese. And they could carry away? Something I do not see worthy of Chinese AK, SU, T. There are similar, similar (in quality) - no. I believe the same applies to the MZKT.
                And you personally brought out information to the Chinese, or so, the great GUGL reported, along with BBS.
                1. 0
                  10 June 2019 19: 40
                  In 1998, a joint assembly enterprise Sanjiang Walat Company, Ltd. was established in Xiogan (Hubei Province) to manufacture multi-axle wheeled tractors and various-purpose chassis with capacities from 20 to 75 t.



                  The founders of the joint venture with a capital of 52,2 million yuan were MZKT from the Belarusian side (its share in the authorized capital is 30%), from the Chinese side - the Sanjiang aerospace corporation (70%). MZKT has contributed technology and components.


                  Good luck bro!
                2. 0
                  10 June 2019 19: 52
                  Something I do not see worthy of Chinese AK, SU, T. Similar is, similar (in quality) - no. I suppose the same applies to MZKT.
                  And you personally carried the information to the Chinese


                  The same Military Parity reported that the Chinese company China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT) presented a model of a specialized ten-wheel vehicle for transporting and launching the CZ-11 launch vehicle (Chang Zheng-11 / “The Great March-11”) . According to some reports, the CZ-11 prototype has become an intercontinental solid-fuel ballistic missile Dong Feng - 31А (DF-31A).


                  Much less is known about the "pedigree" of the wheeled carrier, which will take out the rocket to the launch and serve as a launcher for it. Based on the photos of his model, one can confidently assert only that this machine will have ten axles and the layout of the chassis layout is similar to that of the MZKT products. It is possible that such a coincidence is accidental, and maybe it is a result of the cooperation of Belarusian and Chinese enterprises.


                  And you personally carried the information to the Chinese


                  What for???

                  Note that Lukashenko himself has repeatedly stated: he has no closed topics in dealing with Chinese leaders.
                  .
      3. -1
        9 June 2019 13: 35
        Dill to sell
      4. 0
        10 June 2019 07: 44
        Quote: Olezhek
        Who will target them to 300 km ??
        Neither aviation nor satellites they have

        There is a map and satellite grouping of an ally.
        Quote: Olezhek
        But the Belarusians-it is not clear why.

        From Minsk to Suvalki - 303 km. Is the idea clear?
        1. 0
          10 June 2019 18: 27
          There is a map.


          Map? With cities?

          and satellite ally constellation


          In the sense of China? ?
          1. 0
            10 June 2019 19: 40
            Quote: Olezhek
            Map? With cities?

            No, operational gluing on 54 sheets ... Yes, and China, if necessary, use mona ...
            1. 0
              10 June 2019 19: 47
              And China, on occasion, use mona ...


              You need China. lol
              1. 0
                10 June 2019 19: 49
                Quote: Olezhek
                You need China.

                And you? Are you someone, even your own?
              2. 0
                10 June 2019 19: 49
                Yes, and China on occasion use mona ..


                According to experts, Lukashenko’s foreign policy has long been suggesting the use of China as a counterweight to Russia. In this regard, Minsk, as some observers suggest, was actively engaged in the sale in the PRC of those Soviet military technologies that he had after the collapse of the USSR. Obviously, based on return investments in the economy of Belarus.



                So what? Have you waited for the "investment"?

                We note that Lukashenko himself has repeatedly stated: he has no closed topics in dealing with Chinese leaders.
    4. 0
      9 June 2019 12: 17
      300km - this is serious. Cool.
    5. +3
      9 June 2019 13: 25
      Outwardly, it looks good. Neat launchers. And "Astrologer" is quite a machine. Is it worse than the Tornado?
    6. 0
      9 June 2019 19: 22
      Well done, our designers did not advance beyond 120 km.
      1. +1
        9 June 2019 19: 47
        Over 12 km.? So further and not necessary.
        In the presence of "Tornado" and "Hurricane" for tens of years, their use is very rare, exceptional. Very expensive and excessive in range. More than 90% of tasks are solved by "Grad". Often, calculations for the service life do not carry out a single mass launch.
        More promising (in my opinion) is the creation of multi-caliber installations, which, depending on the task, change the ammunition to fit them.
        With the development of cruise and tactical missiles and UAVs (including strike and "barrage ammunition"), the range will be increased to 200 km. no longer saves the battery from return fire.
        1. 0
          9 June 2019 19: 57
          You made a mistake in the numbers, I indicated 120 km, and not 12000 km.
    7. 0
      9 June 2019 22: 44
      upgraded version of the MLRS "Polonaise-M"

      This is not an MLRS.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"