Electronic warfare as a headache for the Pentagon

19
Modern warfare is not only the usual ways of influencing the enemy. Electronic or electronic components are a quite common component of the concept of the modern use of armed forces. The experiences of the conflicts of the last two decades have shown that in the suppression of artillery and aviation a quite significant competitor appeared - EW.





Everyone understands this. And we, and overseas. Moreover, the use of Russian EW complexes in the Donbass and in Syria has given food for thought in full. And since not only the sawflies of the budgets, but quite sane generals, are sitting in the Pentagon, they too are thinking about tomorrow's day.

Fortunately, the United States is a very peculiar country in terms of information. If there is something classified - it means classified. But if there is no neck, then here you are, dear taxpayers, comments and statements by people with stars on shoulder straps under the stars and stripes.



In the American media, a number of materials were immediately thrown out on the subject of electronic warfare. So they call it.

It is clear that the successful use of our complexes in Syria prompted such actions by the US military. Apparently, the electronic intelligence of the US Armed Forces, which was unambiguously present in the SAR, was able to provide detailed data that somewhat upset the command.

Especially jamming of GSM and GPS systems.

So it is not surprising that the US Department of Defense decided to create a working group to “restore US dominance in the electromagnetic spectrum.”

The head of the group, according to Al Monitor, is General Paul Selva, deputy chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.



The general and his comrades will have to work out a strategy to get out not so much of the crisis, but ... rather, of some thoughtfulness into which the American experts fell after they really came under the blow of the Russian “jammers”.

So this strategy, as well as the roadmap for the development of systems for countering electronic warfare, is all within the framework of "our response to the Russians." Quite so.

And just recently story got a sequel. US Deputy Secretary of Defense James Feist “suddenly” appealed to engineers and designers. It seems that the reason was normal, that is, the celebration of the day of the industrial worker, if in our opinion, but Feist was talking about business is not at all festive.

James Feist, by the way, is the deputy secretary of defense for defense engineering research and projects. And, by the way, himself a former EW-Air Force officer.

So, Feist at a meeting with designers and developers made it clear that he considers the US lag in the EW business to be accomplished, but by no means fatal.

Moreover, the deputy minister believes that this is a positive thing. Because it is the US lagging behind Russia in the development of electronic warfare that is what should stimulate new works and new successes.

In short, “catch up and overtake”.

And the defense industry of the United States must prepare for urgent and necessary actions to catch up.

Syrian lesson was not in vain.

Yes, today, according to the statements of many army specialists, Russia (in opinion from across the ocean) is demonstrating its EW potential for nothing. And with some hint, or something.

And the message to the US Department of Defense was adopted and understood, it is from here that all the aspirations to “catch up and overtake”. Experts (and they are in the United States, I repeat, there are) believe that bridging the gap between the Russian Armed Forces and the US Armed Forces precisely in terms of electronic warfare is one of the main priorities of today and tomorrow.

That, in general, is reasonable and fair.

Since the US military communications operators were in fact only heard about what the Russian EW complexes are, and the data on the use of EW in the Crimea and the Donbas were still more in terms of rumors.

But Syria began ... Which Americans today call the most difficult region precisely in matters of electronic warfare.

But when the EU-130Н, which Kompass Call got, was hit by the distribution, it hit it quite well, everyone here thought about it. And there it was completely clear that the EU-130 was not the object of influence, it really happened to be not where it was necessary.



And when the plane, which itself must suppress anyone, there is quite a decent complex “Rivet Fire”, worthy of respect, and suddenly it turns out to be in an unpleasant situation when you understand what you have worked for, but you can’t do anything ...

Unpleasant

But what do you want from the most aggressive in terms of the EW environment on the planet? Where are the Russians sticking out? And this is not me, this is the head of the US Special Operations Command, General Raymond Thomas, said. Just a quote, nothing more.

But in fact, that is how the ascent begins. Up. First we develop new complexes that can withstand the Russian systems, then we run these complexes in the same Syria, we experience ... We get from the Russians, who invented a new damn thing during this time, and so on.

But there is a goal and a path with a reference to the Polar Star. Although, by and large, all this is a race in a circle, nothing more.

But it is necessary to react. For any superiority of Russia in armaments is a potential threat. A superiority in the EW - doubly.

By the way, there is another region where it is still calm, but the prospect is the place to be. This is the Arctic. There, too, it may not be entirely calm, because in this zone there are very many interests.

Just a couple of months ago, the Norwegians shouted that they had 147% evidence that we had jammed GPS signals during the Trident Juncture exercise, NATO’s biggest war games since the end of the Cold War, conducted around Northern Europe and the Arctic in the end of 2018 of the year.

Well, in general, fairy tales are the maximum for which they worked there with “Murmansk” - this is via radio communication. But we are not fools, they understand that civilians can get under the distribution.

In general, the United States understands that the lag is not very good. And what should really catch up and overtake. The only question is that this is not always possible. A lot of problems. But the US military understands this, which sets them up for combat. It remains for us to wish them good luck in carrying out such a difficult task.

Source.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    10 June 2019 06: 09
    But when the EU-130N, which was Compass Call, fell under the distribution, and it got pretty good, everyone thought about it.

    With humor written, offset.))
  2. +1
    10 June 2019 06: 41
    But in fact, that is how the ascent begins. Up. First we develop new complexes that can withstand the Russian systems, then we run these complexes in the same Syria, we experience ... We get from the Russians, who invented a new damn thing during this time, and so on.
    The eternal struggle of armor and shell
  3. +1
    10 June 2019 11: 59
    Author:
    Roman Skomorokhov
    Moreover, the use of Russian electronic warfare systems in the Donbass and Syria has provided food for thought for the full program ....
    Apparently, the electronic intelligence of the US Armed Forces, which was clearly present in the SAR, was able to provide detailed data, which somewhat upset the command.
    Especially jamming of GSM and GPS systems.

    There is nothing surprising in this, given that already in 1943 the first four SPECNAZ divisions appeared, which were created on the basis of the OSNAZ divisions, the main purpose of which was to suppress the radio networks of German troops. And they acted very successfully, suppressing the control networks of the Germans, in the end, this subsequently served as the basis for creating an independent management of the General Staff of the USSR Ministry of Defense.
    The Americans were very dismissive of our electronic warfare systems, because they had never really seriously faced them, which is why they have a slight shock after Syria.
    By the way, the delay in the development of our GLONASS system just happened because military experts immediately understood its vulnerability to modern electronic warfare systems, which is why in Soviet times it was considered as auxiliary and not particularly reliable.
  4. 0
    10 June 2019 13: 22
    Well, actually, every third plane on aircraft carriers is the F-18 Growler. Specialized jammer. Israel also usually fools the enemy’s radars before its attacks (in various ways).
    Rather, the Americans are not talking about strengthening their electronic warfare in front of their own missile attacks,
    and about some anti-EW measures.
    "Anti-electronic warfare defense", as we call it. Disable enemy electronic warfare equipment prior to combat.
    1. 0
      10 June 2019 15: 57
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Israel also usually fools the enemy’s radars before its attacks (in various ways).

      What are you humane steel. wink Previously, a PRR or other controlled means of delivering explosives to a radar simply flew in.
      1. 0
        10 June 2019 16: 00
        Now you can’t work so rudely.
        Diplomacy! The radar was destroyed only if it was from this complex that our aircraft was fired.
  5. -2
    10 June 2019 13: 58
    US backlog in defense systems is systemic and specific reasons
    firstly, this is not a business project with a specific benefit - it is an irrational liability,
    which is difficult to justify in cost.
    And the more the United States forgets about the fright of the Cold War, the worse it will have with defense systems.
  6. -1
    10 June 2019 14: 03
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Disable enemy EW before battle

    it’s not even utopia - but some kind of unstoppable fantasy.
    rather, we are talking about the simple stability of systems - the possibility of changing the frequencies of radar equipment, protecting against overload, duplication, changing the direction of the antennas, etc.
    almost any NATO combat aircraft can now be shot down with an anti-drone gun at low altitude.
    that's about sustainability
    1. +1
      10 June 2019 15: 38
      "Nowadays, almost any NATO combat aircraft can be shot down with an anti-drone gun at low altitude." ////
      ----
      And is it my uncontrollable fantasy? good laughing
      1. -2
        10 June 2019 15: 40
        this is the vulnerability of electrical control systems
        1. +1
          10 June 2019 15: 48
          But what about thunderstorms? Lightning strikes?
          Powerful magnetic fields in thunderclouds?
          Airplanes should roll from the sky like autumn flies. wink
          1. -3
            10 June 2019 15: 50
            so recently the fly-35 fell saying just because of a thunderstorm.
            1. +1
              10 June 2019 15: 56
              In vain they say. There were two accidents:
              one because of a marriage in the supply pipe of something to the engine. The second is Japanese.
              Oxygen supply? No thunderstorms.
              Thunderstorm aircraft withstand. And the anti-drone gun will withstand effortlessly.
              1. -1
                10 June 2019 15: 58
                Quote: voyaka uh
                Thunderstorm aircraft withstand. And the anti-drone gun will withstand effortlessly.

                oh do not rush to conclusions)))
                1. +1
                  10 June 2019 16: 01
                  Oh! I give up! belay
  7. 0
    15 December 2019 03: 47
    Any electronic warfare is nevertheless based on active counteraction, which means it radiates. And all will end with the creation of missiles that go to noise, similar to PRR from aviation.
  8. 0
    19 January 2020 20: 43

    Can someone explain what it is?
  9. -1
    1 February 2021 19: 18
    The US lagging behind in electronic warfare systems is not just a fake. It's much funnier ... lol
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. -1
    1 February 2021 19: 36
    Quote: yehat
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Disable enemy EW before battle

    almost any NATO combat aircraft can now be shot down with an anti-drone gun at low altitude.

    - It's simple very stupid nonsense.