Scientists have announced a way to "save" the cat Schrödinger

97
Under the heading "Let's talk about science" today we will talk about the statements of scientists that they know "the method of capturing and saving the Schrödinger's cat." First, a few words about what (whom) is called Schrödinger's cat.





We are talking about the mental experiment proposed by Erwin Schrödinger on the description of quantum states, their superposition. The experiment was intended to show the incompleteness of quantum mechanics in the transition from elementary particles to objects of the usual "dimension" (macroscopic bodies). As a macroscopic object and a cat was proposed.

Omitting all Schrödinger's conclusions (they can be simply “google”), we note that we are talking about a state when a cat locked in “laboratory conditions” is either alive or dead - subject to observing it and its “state” connected with the state of the atomic nucleus . With superposition, he can be "alive and dead at the same time." The bottom line is that the nucleus of an atom must either be decaying or not decaying - in the case of external observation, the system “has to choose” one of the states without mixing them. As a result, the “Schrödinger cat” itself became the symbol of the problem of quantum superposition.

And so, at Yale University they said they could predict the “Schrödinger's Cat” jumps.

An article has been published in the journal Nature, which states that the discovery allows scientists to establish an early warning system about the inevitable jumps of artificially created atoms containing quantum information.

The author of the experiment is researcher Zlatko Minev. He declared the discovery of what contradicts the conclusions of the physicist Niels Bohr: the jumps of atomic states cannot be random.

From the article:

When developing quantum computers, researchers must deal with qubit jumps, which are errors in calculations.


Minev says that research is being conducted in the direction of studying "a preliminary signal that a jump in a moment happens" - and "Schrödinger's cat will be saved." If this signal is also studied, this, as stated, promises to be a giant breakthrough in the study of quantum states.

From the article:

The Yale team used a special approach to indirectly monitor an artificial atom, when three microwave generators emit an atom enclosed in a three-dimensional cavity of aluminum. The double indirect control method developed by scientists for superconducting circuits allows observing an atom with unprecedented efficiency.
  • https://ru.depositphotos.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    4 June 2019 08: 32
    the cat is either alive or dead

    sorry for the cat .... crying
    1. +4
      4 June 2019 08: 45
      we will believe. that he is alive and well!
      1. +16
        4 June 2019 09: 16
        Pictured is a cat in a cardboard box. Put the shoe box on the floor, and after a while you will find your cat in it. Mandatory. And it always has been. Apparently, cats tried and are trying to confirm or refute Schrödinger's law. We need to interview them.
        1. +4
          4 June 2019 09: 22
          And also put on the floor a bag or bag, and soon the cat will be in it!
          1. Cat
            +7
            4 June 2019 10: 55
            I carried a cat in a bag to the vet - he now shies away from her like from the worst cat nightmare
            1. 0
              5 June 2019 06: 03
              When my hind legs paralyzed 4 times I drove to the other end of the city, there was something indescribable !! 5 years later she lived ,,, in the family all the disabled and the cat became a heap ,,,,
        2. +4
          4 June 2019 10: 02
          Cats themselves are trying to solve the problem of quantum physics.
        3. Cat
          +3
          4 June 2019 10: 52
          I need to interview them

          It is necessary to interrogate the cotophobe Schrödinger. Well, what is the cat right ?! Or are there few dogs? Like in space - like a dog, and like in a box - like a cat. It's a shame recourse
          1. +2
            4 June 2019 13: 22
            A quantum cat will not catch mice. For progress in life, a living cat is better than a dead cat. what
            1. Cat
              +5
              4 June 2019 13: 28
              Quantum cat will not catch mice

              Cats do not catch mice - more zapadlo. Mice are caught by cats and brought to cats, and they are already showing prey to the owners - look, boss, I'm not in vain eating my food bully
              Although, when my grandfather served in the Far East, he took a reed cat kitten home - he grew up in a huge beast, tens of rats crushed. Fell at the age of 23, which is a record for cats.
          2. 0
            5 June 2019 02: 31
            Quote: Gato
            Well, what is the cat right away?

            And not only the cat - the effect of the "quantum dovecote":
            According to the principle, if you put three pigeons in two cells, then at least two pigeons should be in one cell. This is an obvious and fundamental principle of nature, the very foundations of combinatorics. A study by members of the Institute of Quantum Research (IQS) at Chapman University violates this principle. It demonstrates that you can put an arbitrarily large number of particles in two boxes, and no two particles will be in one box.
        4. +3
          4 June 2019 15: 38
          Quote: depressant
          Pictured is a cat in a cardboard box. Put the shoe box on the floor, and after a while you will find your cat in it. Mandatory.

          You can put any box, vase, jug, toilet bowl. The result will be the same.
          And one more thing: cats are water.




  2. -7
    4 June 2019 08: 33
    And Navalny also "studied" there.
    Cat Schrödinger catch.
    Aha
    That catches.
    “Schrödinger's cat will be saved”
  3. Cat
    +7
    4 June 2019 08: 35
    As if the cat would not take revenge on the egghead for such mental experiments ... At least he definitely shit in Schrödinger's slippers wassat
    1. +5
      4 June 2019 10: 00
      Quote: Gato
      At least in the shoes of Schrödinger, he definitely spoiled

      --------------------
      His slippers can certainly change their quantum state and be pissed and not pissed at the same time. Gridasov’s colleague probably has such a cat. Or he pisses with such urine. laughing
      1. Cat
        +4
        4 June 2019 10: 57
        what I'll go check my slippers for a quantum state sad
        1. +2
          4 June 2019 12: 17
          Quote: Gato
          I'll go check my slippers for a quantum state

          --------------------------
          Do you have a cat? Check the heap quantum state of his urinal tray. Surely it is already multidispersed. laughing hi
          1. Cat
            +2
            4 June 2019 13: 07
            Do you have a cat? Check the heap quantum state of his urinal tray. Surely it is already multidisperse

            Taki i have a cat fellow Only now the state of his pot obeys the laws of quantum physics - you never know exactly where he is. With some probability, he may be on my blanket. Then I’m remembering Schrödinger and his box, and the cat pretends that he has long been dead and doesn’t want to eat request
        2. 0
          5 June 2019 06: 05
          My all quickly weaned something to put on the floor!
  4. +7
    4 June 2019 08: 48
    It turns out that prior to this discovery, scientists simply ignored this "trivial" problem. Despite this, some even managed to create a "reliable" working channel. Naturally, I do not know much, but I guess that we do not have commercial communication lines that use qubits in their pure form. There are groups of photons using groups and I was very surprised that this is passed off as photon encoding since it is so far away from single photon state encoding technology.
  5. +4
    4 June 2019 08: 50
    If in a nutshell, before a quantum transition from one state to another, the frequency of flashes of light produced by an atom is Dramatically reduced. The duration of the process is approx. 45 μs.
    Ie quantum transitions are not INSTANT, and they can be predicted and "prevented" - to save the cat.
    ONCE AGAIN the "typically" English name of an American scientist touches me.
    1. +4
      4 June 2019 08: 55
      But after all, flashes of light are the transitions from one state to another. And the duration of the process - 45 μs - is simply enormous. Explain your statement.
      1. +2
        4 June 2019 12: 34
        And the process time is 45 μs
        I don’t know where the comrade took information from, but he was mistaken by an order of magnitude. In the original article, the figure 4.2 ± 0.03 μs appears.
        In the original article, the graph and signature look like this.

        Semi-log plot of the histogram (shaded green) of the duration of times corresponding to | B〉 -measurement results, τB, for 3.2 s of continuous data of the type shown in Fig. 2a. Solid line is an exponential fit which yields a 4.2 ± 0.03 μs time constant.
        Maybe the comrade did not take into account that the scale along the X axis is not arithmetic, but logarithmic.
  6. +8
    4 June 2019 09: 09
    Using the function of a constant value of a number, namely, the property of a number about which few people know the superposition is determined by three parameters. Landau hinted at this. This means that the simultaneous state and position, there is no atom and not any other particle
    and an electronic magnetic impulse is determined not only by a superposition in two parameters is or not, but in nine parameters corresponding to the nat. row. A person in the basis of the existence of the mat of the world and in the form of the existence of the smallest particle of the world takes the basis of a single number or unit, this is called zero-dimensionality and in the future the analysis carries out exactly the unit form of calculations. That is, the number is one and everything is measured relative to it. the numbers of the nat series are, and the calculations are carried out as systemic ones and with a constant combination there is not or not, but a combination of nine numbers of the nat series. We are stupid because for us a unit is a parameter of something so vague. But if we take all the steps, then we immediately possess the parameters of any smallest material and mathematical object of space, and these parameters are defined as a system of triune properties - dimension, vectoriality
    development, and potentiality. And then we can construct any local space as a capacity and a combination of an incredibly large variative system, but with absolutely exact parameters of each point represented not by unity or zero, or even like, but as a complex of properties coming from the description by the numbers of the series. Therefore, quantum computers do not solve the problem of a high degree of analysis. Because the basis is still binary code that is not tied to a number and there is no system for distributing big data. There is no mathematics at the base. Therefore, first people and mathematicians must open the function of the constant value of the number and understand ,what it is.
    1. +7
      4 June 2019 09: 55
      Well, that’s a completely different matter, you know how, Gridasov!
      And about the article I almost broke my brains. Yes
      1. Cat
        +3
        4 June 2019 11: 00
        And about the article I almost broke my brains

        Call the cat - he will explain Yes
      2. +6
        4 June 2019 14: 46
        "Gridasov is the head! I wouldn't put a finger in his mouth" (I. Ilf, E. Petrov, "The Golden Calf")
        1. Cat
          0
          7 June 2019 12: 48
          I wouldn’t put a finger in his mouth

          And I'm so shy to say feel
      3. +1
        4 June 2019 20: 54
        Quote: Dym71
        Well, that’s a completely different matter, you know how, Gridasov!
        And about the article I almost broke my brains.

        take it for a week before bed and even Planck’s constant will not strain!

        1. 0
          4 June 2019 21: 14
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          and even "Planck's Constant" will not strain!

          But I guessed, Dmitry, that you are an insidious type! bully
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          take it before bed for a week

          Before or after love joys? wassat
          1. +1
            5 June 2019 06: 40
            Quote: Dym71
            Before or after love joys?


            after reading such works is not up to fun, drawn to the sublime more ..
            1. 0
              5 June 2019 09: 44
              Quote: Maki Avellievich
              after reading such works is not up to fun, drawn to the sublime more ..

              So before, the hint is understood, sir! bully
  7. +4
    4 June 2019 09: 29
    The article, in the form in which it is, is absolutely insignificant
    1. +6
      4 June 2019 09: 33
      That you have not read a collection of scholarly writings of Schrödinger himself ...
      1. Cat
        +1
        4 June 2019 11: 04
        That you have not read the collection of scientific works of Schrödinger himself

        But at the institutes we studied the differential equation of his name and got "excellent" for him. True, what for it is necessary, they did not understand wassat
        1. 0
          4 June 2019 14: 52
          To describe the behavior of microparticles. In the simplest version, the line spectra of atoms are described, and in solid-state physics (where Bloch wrote this equation for a crystal), the appearance of forbidden and allowed bands, which is the basis of the band theory and made it possible to create a transistor and so on.
      2. +3
        4 June 2019 11: 10
        hi
        I forgot who read physics to us in the university more than half a century ago. But the cleverest uncle. It happened that I took apart some of the paradoxes from different points of view, including showed several ways to calculate the equations of the special theory of relativity, incl. from the Pythagorean theorem. He also liked to fasten the laws of philosophy to physical laws. For example, the unity and struggle of opposites to the quantum and wave theories of light. He even denied uncertainty and contingency in microphysics. He said that chance was an unknown need and gave specific examples from the history of physics.
        But in general, he would have liked a joke:
        Two professors of physics are sitting on the boulevard. A beautiful woman passes by. One professor addresses another: - Colleague! Pay attention to how extremely interesting the atoms are grouped!
        He himself cited such an anecdote from the book "Physicists are joking":
        The archangel refers to the creator: - Lord! They determined the value of Planck's constant! - Gavryusha, but we will add a couple of nonlinear members to the general field theory!
        1. Cat
          +1
          4 June 2019 11: 24
          including showed several ways of calculating the equations of the particular theory of relativity, including from the Pythagorean theorem

          It didn’t come to that, yes ... Ohm's law was derived from the Schrödinger equation, but the Pythagorean theorem is already beyond request
        2. +1
          4 June 2019 12: 40
          Quote: My address
          He also liked to attach the laws of philosophy to physical laws. For example, the unity and struggle of opposites to the quantum and wave theories of light.

          ------------------
          And philosophy is by no means an abstract science and has applied significance. Many teachers demonstrate the applicability of laws and relationships that philosophy has opened up to other sciences.
        3. +3
          4 June 2019 13: 15
          Quote: My address
          randomness, this is an unknown need

          Chic definition! good
          1. Cat
            +2
            4 June 2019 13: 23
            I join, I will quote on occasion hi
            1. +1
              4 June 2019 21: 22
              So it’s kind of a hunter?
              chance is an unconscious need
  8. 0
    4 June 2019 09: 30
    The case of Mr. iPhone and Mr. Academician Ginsburg lives and wins!
    This is me about the work of the commission on pseudoscience at the RAS.
    As a result of the work of the commission's sages, all these "pseudo-scientific" nonsense - how to catch a cat with a net - are published in other countries, but not in Russia.
    By the way, in the United States there have recently been a number of publications on spintronics and Slavic names were present.
  9. +8
    4 June 2019 09: 47
    As I understand it, the British described Skripal's cat, which can be "alive and dead at the same time," depending on which box it is in at the moment. Such is the Skripal-Schrödinger effect. laughing laughing hi
  10. +1
    4 June 2019 09: 59
    And what does the Schrodinger cat have to do with it? It talks about the decay of a radioactive substance and the fact that until we observe (key point), the particle is in superposition, like the cat, the poor fellow, connected with it.
    And in this case, we are talking about observing and possibly predicting a quantum jump.
  11. -1
    4 June 2019 10: 00
    British scientists, leave the cat alone!

    laughing

    Especially the Sea Cat!
  12. +5
    4 June 2019 10: 15
    A cat was proposed as a macroscopic object.

    Cat is a good thing!
    1. Cat
      +4
      4 June 2019 11: 31
      Cat is a good thing!

      Wow .. Only eats a lot and ironing is always necessary. In this he is no different from his wife laughing
  13. +3
    4 June 2019 10: 20
    Title:
    Scientists have announced a way to "save" the cat Schrödinger

    But the article itself only speaks of intentions to develop such a method:
    Minev says that research is being conducted in order to study the “preliminary signal that a jump will happen in a moment” - and “the Schrodinger cat will be saved.”

    If we undertake to discuss the exact sciences, then we must express ourselves extremely accurately.
    Quote: Aviator_
    But after all, flashes of light are the transitions from one state to another. And the duration of the process - 45 μs - is simply enormous.

    It is true that precisely as a result of the transition of an electron from one level to another, a photon is emitted. Therefore, it is not clear what preliminary signals can be discussed.
    jumps in atomic states cannot be random.

    Of course they can’t. But no one has yet come up with a mathematical apparatus for the exact calculations of such transitions. Therefore, we use what is - based on probability theory.
    But the cat is really sorry - for how many years he has not known whether he is alive or dead.
  14. -1
    4 June 2019 10: 56
    Why this article? What would you laugh?
    Well, I want about science, well, I would have sorted the basic equation of radar, its particular solutions.
    At the same time, they would explain why the stealth has significantly different EPR at different frequencies.
    For VO more useful ....
    1. +3
      4 June 2019 12: 14
      Why this article? What would you laugh?
      Well, I want to talk about science, well, I would have sorted the basic equation of radar
      This would absolutely not change anything, since for the vast majority of visitors to this section such topics are far beyond comprehension.
      In addition, this article is about an article about an article, so to speak. That is, the article itself, which was published in Nature, no one has read. Besides the fact that it is intended for specialists, you need to pay money for reading it - $ 9. Or have an annual subscription for 210 euros.
      Therefore, Jim Shelton's article is being discussed online, based on a brief press release published last year by a group of researchers and information from Yale University.
      Shelton, although he is the Deputy Secretary of the US Department of Education, is a bachelor of programmer by education and is still far from quantum physics, so he writes about the experiment in the most general details, and pays more attention to "Schrodinger's cat".
      Well, then journalists, even more far from understanding the issue, each put Shelton's article in their own way. As a result, we read the bravura message that "the discovery allows scientists to establish an early warning system for the imminent jumps of artificially created atoms containing quantum information", and the scientists themselves humbly say that "our findings should provide a new basis for research into interventions in real time in the control of quantum systems ".
      That is, journalists trumpet the discovery, and scientists inform that they have taken the next step on the road to discovery.
      Therefore, if we publish such materials, then they need a separate section and authors with an understanding of the topics discussed.
      1. -1
        4 June 2019 13: 28
        This would absolutely not change anything, since for the vast majority of visitors to this section such topics are far beyond comprehension.

        Well, about 20 percent would understand ... if you write well.
        Well, it's not about the radar equation, but about how the software is really hacked ...
        I mean to write an article on the topic on which people regularly do not understand anything in the comments.
        In this case, it is not even clear why this is to be applied.
        For example, I read a comment
        but I guess that we do not have commercial communication lines in their pure form using qubits.


        I tried to understand how this relates to the article and spat ...
        1. +1
          4 June 2019 14: 03
          In general, it cannot be said that the question of the article does not have any relation to VO. It is directly related to the topic of creating a full-fledged quantum computer, which so far is a hypothetical device. Well, computers and weapons are topics inextricably linked today.
          "but I guess we don't have commercial communication lines that use qubits in their pure form."
          I tried to understand how this relates to the article and spat ....
          This is directly related to the article. Thanks to the article, a person has yet unconsciously embarked on the path of understanding that there are "physical" qubits, thanks to which quantum communication functions, and "logical" qubits, thanks to which a quantum computer functions.
          If it’s good to write about it without pushing the cat, it will be very interesting. But for this, people like Sergey Petrovich Kapitsa are needed.
          1. -1
            4 June 2019 14: 14
            there are “physical” qubits, thanks to which quantum communication functions, and “logical” qubits, thanks to which a quantum computer functions.

            Well, what is logical understandable, but physical is a pair of entangled photons?
            1. +1
              4 June 2019 15: 40
              You know, I am extremely far from Sergei Petrovich, so my explanation may not be as interesting as "Obvious, incredible", but since there are no more people who want to cover the issue, I will try within the framework of my own knowledge.
              By "physical" is meant the modern qubit used in today's quantum networks. These qubits are extremely, shall we say, "fragile", they easily interact with the outside world and lose their quantum information very quickly.
              Even the simplest quantum calculations cannot be performed with their help. To do this, you first need to get exactly the "logical qubit", which can maintain quantum information for an infinitely long time by means of error correction.
              You yourself understand that it is not easy to describe the issue of physical implementation of the process in a clear and interesting way, as well as to find such an author for the site. With this, apparently, the tension, since in the section "Weapons" pro-missiles are written by a person who generally does not understand anything about them. So these are rockets. And then a quantum computer!
              1. -1
                4 June 2019 16: 16
                Understood thanks. I have never heard that they are called "physical qubit"
              2. -1
                4 June 2019 17: 37
                You know, I’m extremely far from Sergei Petrovich


                This is normal.

                It is said that beyond planet Earth there are only three people who fully understand the theory of superstrings and ten people who fully understand quantum physics.

                The rest just pretend to understand.

                Yes
        2. +1
          5 June 2019 02: 48
          Quote: bk316
          I mean to write an article on the topic on which people regularly do not understand anything in this topic in the comments.

          Do you think these people will read such an article? request They already know everything ... Yes

          PS Although, I must admit, after reading some comments, such thoughts also flash ...
    2. Cat
      +1
      4 June 2019 13: 46
      would understand the basic equation of radar, its particular solutions

      Do you want people to break the brain in general? Let's get better about cats .. or about ba .. (sorry, about women) laughing
      1. +1
        4 June 2019 13: 53
        Quote: Gato
        Do you want people to break the brain in general?

        Nonsense, Gridasov will explain! smile
        1. Cat
          +1
          4 June 2019 13: 55
          Gridasov

          I'm not in the subject, but who is this? I hope he heard something about women wassat
          1. +3
            4 June 2019 14: 03
            Quote: Gato
            I'm not in the subject, but who is this?

            Dear, you have been on the site for six years and do not know "gridasov" - eh ??? belay
            Yes, your whole life has passed by in VO! fellow
            You can’t say a word for him, you must read it! Yes
            https://topwar.ru/user/gridasov/
            1. Cat
              0
              4 June 2019 14: 05
              don't know "gridasov"

              No, I don’t know, but is it worth it? There are some suspicions that this is a grade d..ma. And I don’t want to understand this. Or I'm wrong?
              1. +3
                4 June 2019 14: 12
                Quote: Gato
                No, I don’t know, but is it worth it?

                Your question is not easy, the question is from the bronchus!
                Mr. Gridasov (due to his own capabilities) reveals to us (due to our tight little mind) the method of scientific cognition of theoretical thinking, especially in "methods of mathematical analysis of super-intensive data" and this, like him, "dynamically transformed models of the motion of a hydro-gas-dynamic flow", how!
                1. Cat
                  +1
                  4 June 2019 14: 18
                  method of scientific knowledge of theoretical thinking

                  This is strong. And what is this adherent of the scientific method about? Anticipating your answer, with a 146% probability, about our money with you - or is it a martyr of pure science?
                  1. +1
                    4 June 2019 14: 27
                    Pure science!
                    And I beg you, erase in the comment from 14:05 about suspicions, why should a person be offended? He’s been in VO for seven years, and this is not Khuhra-Mukhra!
                    1. Cat
                      +1
                      4 June 2019 14: 31
                      why offend a person

                      I am ready to apologize. Where to deliver?
                      1. 0
                        4 June 2019 14: 33
                        Yes, erase quietly until he has read all the business. hi
                        If not deleted, I can complain about your comment to be deleted.
                      2. Cat
                        +1
                        4 June 2019 14: 36
                        until he read

                        You just scare me, now I’ll sleep under the bed with a shotgun in my arms belay
                      3. 0
                        4 June 2019 14: 40
                        Quote: Gato
                        You just scare me, now I’ll sleep under the bed with a shotgun in my arms

                        No, that you are, so he is a sincere person.
                      4. Cat
                        0
                        4 June 2019 14: 45
                        I am at a loss, I looked in pedivikia at the request of "Gridasov", all extremely respected people:
                        Gridasov, Vladimir Sergeevich (b. 1941) - production leader. Hero of Socialist Labor.
                        Gridasov, Grigory Makarovich (1922-1995) - participant of the Great Patriotic War, Hero of the Soviet Union.
                        Gridasov, Dmitry Matveevich (1916-1989) - Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Stalin Regional Council of Deputies.
                        Gridasov, Dmitry Tikhonovich (1925-1945) - a participant in the Great Patriotic War, Hero of the Soviet Union.
                        Gridasov, Fedor Ivanovich (1901 -?) - military leader, intelligence officer.
                      5. 0
                        4 June 2019 14: 46
                        Quote: Gato
                        I am at a loss, I looked in pedivikia at the request of "Gridasov", all extremely respected people:

                        Our from Odessa, I don’t know anything at all, chesslovo! Yes
                      6. The comment was deleted.
                      7. +1
                        4 June 2019 14: 51
                        Quote: Gato
                        .e., my version was confirmed - unknown to anyone

                        Not a fact, he can write under a pseudonym, and what's the difference, Gridasov still doesn't recognize the authorities, he is "Petliura himself!" (c) movie "Wedding in Malinovka"
                      8. Cat
                        +1
                        4 June 2019 14: 55
                        laughing We all do not recognize authorities and write under nicknames laughing
                      9. +1
                        4 June 2019 15: 58
                        Well, for some reason, I recognize and respect everyone. But, the main truth in science. Therefore, I believe that, nevertheless, the function of a constant value of a number is not nonsense, but the real properties of the number, which will make it possible to see the world real, and not through the prism of illusions, inaccuracies, approximations, etc. And the fact that it is easier to calculate magnetic force processes, build symmetries, build algorithms from numbers, see and comprehend numerical flows is a fact.
                      10. Cat
                        0
                        7 June 2019 13: 19
                        the main thing is science

                        Truth is only the point of view of the observer
                      11. The comment was deleted.
                      12. +2
                        4 June 2019 15: 50
                        If interested, then my last name is Alexander Danilovich Bogaychuk, who is a mining engineer, mechanic. And I'm 60 years old.
                      13. Cat
                        0
                        4 June 2019 18: 03
                        My last name

                        My last name approximately matches my nickname. I live in Kiev, Russian, by origin and belief. A notorious separatist and a little Makhnovist. But, to be honest, I want a revival of the USSR. I am fifty times
                      14. +1
                        4 June 2019 19: 03
                        Nice to hear. Greetings!
                      15. Cat
                        0
                        4 June 2019 21: 34
                        Me too. Mutually hi Although Gridasov
  15. -1
    4 June 2019 11: 10
    And how sideways such news has to do with the "military review"? ok it would be a "scientific review", then, yes
    1. Cat
      +2
      4 June 2019 11: 35
      Science develops only thanks to the militaristic inclinations of mankind - otherwise it makes no sense.
      1. +1
        4 June 2019 16: 05
        I absolutely agree with this! Therefore, when I talk about the concept of a fundamentally different relatively modern solutions, an engine for aviation, I think the military should be interested in this. Or about a nuclear reactor on non-radioactive materials and combining both an electric motor and an electric motor or about electric motors on a rotating magnetic flux and new induction coils, which still need to be thought of.
        1. Cat
          0
          4 June 2019 18: 26
          Ahh, now it’s clear who the grid is. Go away nasty
          1. 0
            4 June 2019 20: 22
            Quote: Gato
            Go away nasty

            Well, why are you so, Sergey?
            A man to you with all his soul, and you?
            Tse not comme il faut! crying
  16. +1
    4 June 2019 12: 07
    Anticipating the questions, why is this bullshit here? -
    "The research was supported by the US Army Research Office."
    This is a step towards creating a full-fledged quantum computer.
    Accordingly, it is useful for military technology.
  17. +1
    4 June 2019 12: 12
    Good article., Capacious yes. Everyone is making fun of the cat ... and meanwhile we already have article 245 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - "Cruelty to animals." So stop pampering with the cat. This would be Sheldon Cooper from the TV series "The Big Bang Theory" that's who would definitely check out the article)))
  18. +2
    4 June 2019 12: 18
    Of course, the article on VO is written chaotically.
    In the original Yale article, the goal, as I understood it, was to prove that quantum transitions (more precisely, levels) are like states of a volcano or the origin of an atmospheric vortex. That is, they are strictly probabilistic in a large time scale. But on small time scales, the state of the systems (future) can be predicted by a certain group of secondary signs-parameters (indirectly).
    1. +1
      4 June 2019 13: 58
      Tolkovo, Pavel, even I pinched something.
      Quote: Shahno
      But on small time scales, the state of the systems (future) can be predicted by a certain group of secondary signs-parameters (indirectly).

      Like how the animals of force majeure smell, right?
      1. +1
        4 June 2019 14: 18
        Somewhere like that. In animals, this is called complex reflex intuition. There, the brain works intuitively, evaluating a group of factors.
        And here, as it were, a continuation of the synergetic approach, but to the quantum state.
        PS. Actually, this is already inherent in the Schrödinger equations. laughing
        1. 0
          4 June 2019 14: 22
          Quote: Shahno
          And here, as it were, a continuation of the synergetic approach, but to the quantum state.

          Pavel, but here finally, as explained twice two! You just need to look at the definition of the phrase "quantum state", the rest of the words I already know. wassat
          Thank you, my mind grows! fellow
          Quote: Shahno
          PS. Actually, this is already inherent in the Schrödinger equations.

          And here, I ask you, you don’t need to drive horses, otherwise you can rattle into a fool. recourse
          1. +1
            4 June 2019 14: 34
            I'm afraid it's a whole book talkwink But I will try to help with understanding, since such an article has been published.
            A state is a group of physical quantities of a certain object that have an unambiguous mathematical description (root of 2, five, green color of intensity 100).
            A quantum state is a collection of such states.
            And the cherry on the cake, these states are infinitely many.
            1. 0
              4 June 2019 14: 45
              Quote: Shahno
              (root of 2, five, intensity 100 green)

              O Lord God! Pavel, how did you get out of the union? belay
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +1
                4 June 2019 21: 02
                Quote: Dym71
                O Lord God! Pavel, how did you get out of the union?

                He painted koshak in green.
                1. 0
                  4 June 2019 21: 28
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  He painted koshak in green.

                  Too easy because it does not agree:
                  Quote: Shahno
                  root of 2, five

                  laughing
                  1. +1
                    4 June 2019 21: 33
                    Quote: Dym71
                    Too easy because it does not agree:

                    Yes, I like that koshak jumped on his chest and screamed a good mat. Here I gave him a pindule fellow
  19. 0
    4 June 2019 16: 58
    I don’t know what’s happening with the cat, but I can very definitely say that I don’t have more beer in the bottle, how many don’t look there (
    1. +1
      4 June 2019 17: 18
      Quote: 4UMA
      I can very definitely say that I don’t have more beer in the bottle, how many don’t look in there (

      Bottles, this is a separate issue, there’s no way to slip through the condachka. bully
      Need a systematic approach! wassat
  20. 0
    4 June 2019 21: 00
    Wow, mother dear ... Yes, pour the boarder, and all the cases ... Yes
  21. +1
    4 June 2019 21: 17
    Quote: Maki Avellevich
    Quote: Dym71
    Well, that’s a completely different matter, you know how, Gridasov!
    And about the article I almost broke my brains.

    take it for a week before bed and even Planck’s constant will not strain!


    This is stronger acting.
  22. 0
    7 June 2019 03: 18
    Well, that is, finally received yet another evidence of quackery with this CM. And that’s all: Einstein, Einstein ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"