Group weapon support. From simplicity of design to shooting accuracy

50
Translation of an article published in the German Arms Magazine (Deutsche Waffenjournal, 2018 Year, No. XXUMX).


CMG-2




By the beginning of the 1950s in the NATO countries, a single cartridge 7,62x51 was adopted, as well as weapon under him: automatic rifles (individually) and machine guns as a weapon of support. The bet was made on the fight at large distances, and therefore required high efficiency against the "hard" and "soft" targets.

Weapons and ammunition in the aftermath of the 2 World War II had a large mass, which reduced the infantry's wearable ammunition. Another drawback was the low accuracy of shooting bursts due to strong recoil.

US Army Projects


For the above reasons, the US Army, regardless of NATO, adopted the 1963 XXNX “light individual weapon” М16 in the 5,56 year. A fighter armed with such weapons could carry almost twice as many cartridges as in the case of the M45 rifle. Proponents of the “large caliber” among the military were not thrilled and criticized the low efficiency of the low-pulse cartridge at long distances. In the middle of the 14-ies, the Organization for Training Fighters, Military Analysis and Strategy Development (TRADOC) developed the requirements for a new lightweight small-caliber machine gun. Each infantry unit, equipped with two such machine guns, was supposed to have firepower sufficient to force the enemy to the ground with intensive fire bursts.

Immediately began discussions about what caliber such machine guns should have. Suddenly, from the very beginning, the opinion prevailed that the powerful 7,62-x51 cartridge is not suitable for this purpose. At the same time, many experts thought that the available M193 cartridges and the M196 tracer of the 5,56x45 caliber were also too weak. Began the search for a compromise. They offered a completely new cartridge caliber 6х45 with a mass of 6,8 g bullet and an initial speed of 745 m / s. After years of testing and discussion, it was decided not to complicate the range of ammunition and leave the caliber 5,56x45, but with a new, improved bullet.

At first, an experienced cartridge of Federal Cartridge Corporation was selected. Compared with the M193 chuck, it was equipped with a Frankford Arsenal XMUMNUMX shell bullet with 287 weight. The American army gave the Canadian manufacturer of ammunition IVI an order to manufacture pilot lots of XM4,4 and XM287 cartridges (tracer).

At this point, the Colt firm, on its own initiative, was developing a light machine gun of a new caliber. The first option was CAR (Coltr Automatic Rifle) based on AR-15 with a more massive barrel and tape power. Then it was the turn of a full-fledged CMG-2 machine gun (Colt Machine Gun) with a vapor system and band feed.

It used the existing and time-tested structural elements available on the world arms market.

At the same time, Cadillak Gage from Michigan, with the Stoner 63 family of weapons, developed by experienced gunsmith designer Eugene Stoner, joined the race.

Group weapon support. From simplicity of design to shooting accuracy

Stoner 63 A


The Stoner 63 A was a light machine gun with venting automatics and band power. The shot was made from the open shutter. The military showed interest in this sample and assigned it the designation HM207. During the Vietnam War, it was used under the designation MK23 "seals", and at the beginning of 1970-x and army special forces. Despite this, this weapon was never officially adopted by any of the types of armed forces due to its complexity and lack of reliability.

The Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) 1970-1980 program


In the 1966 year, the Small Arms Weapon Study (SAWS) research program developed requirements for light weapons for infantry squad fire support. Its weight with ammunition in 200 cartridges should not exceed 10,5 kg. For comparison: the mass of the M60 machine gun with two hundred rounds of ammunition was 17,6 kg.

In 1970, the program was renamed “Small Automatic Weapon” (SAW). The weapon was to be served by one person, and in battle it occupied an intermediate position between individual small arms and МХNUMX machine guns.

In 1972, the US Department of Defense announced a competition for such weapons for general-purpose troops, but the US Army developed its technical requirements only in 1977. Four manufacturers were admitted to the competition.

XM248 LMG (Ford Aerospace USA)


A feature of this sample was simplicity. The number of its parts was on 40% less than that of other machine guns of this class. This meant lower costs in mass production. To improve the accuracy of shooting, balanced automatics were used, and the firing rate when shooting in bursts was reduced to 500 rounds per minute.



TTX

Caliber: 5,56x45
Patron: HM777 / HM778
Cutting step: 305 mm
Bullet weight:
lead shell - 3,5 g
tracer - 3,4 g

Automation: gas outlet
Food: tape
Weight: 5,3 kg
Rate of Fire: 500 fps. / Min.

Note: shot from the open shutter


XM262 (HK23A-1) Heckler und Koch


The basis for this weapon served as a machine gun HK21 caliber 7,62 x51, designed for the Bundeswehr, but never adopted. The weapon is similar to the automatic G3 rifle. Automatic equipment works due to return of a semi-free shutter with deceleration by rollers.



Heckler und Koch has joined the SAW program since the middle of 1970. In accordance with its requirements, the design of the machine gun was redesigned to use the cartridge 5,56 x45, and the weight is significantly reduced. Tests of weapons passed with standard cartridges M193 and M196. But the conditions have changed, and the Canadian HM287 and XM288 high power cartridges already mentioned above should have been used in weapons, and this weapon was not calculated for them. During the tests, frequent breaks of thin-walled shells occurred, which led to the failure of NK23А in the competition.

TTX

Caliber: 5,56x45
Patron: HM777 / HM778
Cutting step: 305 mm
Bullet weight:
lead shell - 3,5 g
tracer - 3,4 g

Automation: due to the return of the semi-free shutter with the slowing rollers
Food: tape
Weight: 7,6 kg
Rate of Fire: 800 fps. / Min.

Note: the shot is made from the closed shutter


XM106 - Heavy Barrel


This development began in 1978 and was funded by the US Army R & D Office for Armed Forces (US Army ARRADCOM). It was conducted by a ballistic research laboratory, the Aberdeen Proving Ground and Colt. The weapon was a modified M16А1 rifle, equipped with a thick-walled barrel with a quick-change mechanism and a bipedal bipod. Power was supplied from a standard magazine on 30 cartridges or from a drum cartridge, on a 83 cartridge.



TTX
Caliber: 5,56x45
Patron: HM777 / HM778
Cutting step: 305 mm
Bullet weight:
lead shell - 3,5 g
tracer - 3,4 g

Automation: gas outlet
Food: drum shop on 83 cartridge or standard shop M-16
Weight: 4,8 kg
Rate of Fire: 750 alt./min.

Note: shot from the open shutter


XM249 (FN MINIMI), Belgium


This light machine gun was introduced to the Belgian army as early as 1974, and was tested. Compared to his rivals in the SAW competition, he had the advantage that, as a result of these tests, the necessary changes were made to the design. For example, the power supply system of the store or tape, quick replacement of the barrel were worked out long before the start of the competition SAW. The cutting pitch has been optimized for S109 machineguns with a dual-core 4 gram bullet.



TTX

Caliber: 5,56x45
Patron: SS109 / L110
Cutting step: 178 mm
Bullet weight:
lead shell - 4,02 g
tracer - 4,00 g

Automation: gas outlet
Food: tape or store M-16
Weight: 6,5 kg
Rate of fire: 700-1000 alt./min.

Note: shot from the open shutter


SAW Tests


Trials planned to start in 1978 year. Each manufacturer had to submit 4 weapon samples in the 18 quarter. Six of them were tested in Aberdeen, nine were sent for military trials to Fort Benning (Georgia), the remaining three were kept as reference.

Comparative tests began in April 1979-th. For ten months, weapons samples were tested in the toughest conditions. They were exposed to sand, dust, dirt, after which they were tested for their performance, accuracy at distances up to 1000 meters, suitability for replacing the barrel in less than 10 seconds, safety, wear and tear of parts and their interchangeability, ergonomics. Total conducted 54 test.

The test results, which were evaluated in May 1980, showed that none of the samples submitted fully met the requirements. The best was recognized as HM249 FN MINIMI, which was recommended for adoption. With this positive conclusion for FN, the SAW competition was completed.

M249 SAW


However, FN had to make a number of changes to the design of the weapon. In 1982, FN presented a modified model HM249EX1, which after successful tests was adopted by the US Army under the designation M249, complete with a new improved cartridge of the caliber 5,56x45.

The first to acquire this weapon was the Marine Corps in the same year. It was followed by the army, ordering 68000 such machine guns. According to this order, the first 2000 samples could be made in Belgium. Since 1984, the production of the M249 was to be established in the city of Colombia (J. Carolina).

New cartridge for M249


In 1982, the United States acquired from FN the right to manufacture FN SS109 cartridges (US designation M855) with a dual core and a FN SS110 tracking cartridge (M856). Production was launched at the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant (LCAAP) cartridge plant.

The spread of FN MINIMI in the world


Simultaneously with the SAW program in the USA in Europe, within the framework of NATO, a competition for a new cartridge was held. And here in the section “Light group weapons of support” the Belgian FN MINIMI with the SS109 cartridge had an advantage and was recommended for use in NATO armies. These successes brought to the Belgian concern numerous orders for MINIMI and its variants from 75 countries of the world, including from many NATO countries. In some countries, this weapon is still manufactured under license. Over the 35 years, it has perfectly manifested itself in numerous conflicts, including in the extreme conditions of the Middle East. In the middle of the 80's MINIMI, NATO was chosen as the only weapon for testing cartridges.

FN MINIMI Para. Landing option


Some armies needed a compact light machine gun to arm paratroopers and crews of combat vehicles. For this purpose, the developers shortened the MINIMI barrel by 125 mm, and the total length of the weapon by 350 mm. To improve the usability of the weapon was equipped with an adjustable butt and front pistol grip. The initial speed of the bullet with a shortened barrel fell by about 60 m / s, but at short distances, this does not matter much.



Adapted to the requirements of the American Army, the FN MINIMI Para was adopted there under the designation M249X4. He also entered service with the special forces of Great Britain under the designation L110A1, and then L110A2.

Light machine gun Hekler & Koch


The Bundeswehr only in 1995 adopted the 5,56x45 cartridge and the G36 assault rifle, which means that until that moment it did not feel the need for a light support weapon for this caliber. According to the Ministry of Defense, the MG3 machine gun of 7,62x51 caliber that was available at that time could perform the entire range of tasks facing the infantry units. As a result of this "supplier of His Majesty's court", Hekler & Koch did not develop light machine guns. Only the success of the FN MINIMI in the world market and the experience of operating the G36, the first N&K weapon with gas-operated automation, prompted N&K developers in the late 1990s to create a light MG34 machine gun for an intermediate cartridge. They carried out the work on their own initiative, but with an eye on the further adoption of the Bundeswehr. The MG34 was a gas-operated, belt-fed machine gun. The shot is fired from a closed bolt. Rate of fire-850 high / min. Since 2001, the Bundeswehr has joined the work. Hekler & Koch carried out their own extensive testing. Thanks to contacts with the American military, N&K was able to conduct them, including at the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. A survivability test was carried out in extreme conditions. Within six days, 34 shots were fired from the MG102000 prototype with two interchangeable barrels. There were no comments on the weapon.

The Bundeswehr showed interest, and together with the WTD91 Test Center of the Bundeswehr, the manufacturers of Dynamit Nobel AG and MEN cartridges, the machine gun was modified to use the already adopted DM11 dual-core cartridges and DM21 tracer.


DM11 cartridge


In 2004, the light machine gun was adopted by the Bundeswehr under the designation MG4


MG4 Machine Gun


New trends in the US


Based on the experience of the war in Iraq, on the initiative of the Marine Corps in 1999, the development of a light “infantry automatic rifle” (IAR) was started. But practical work began only six years later. The new weapon was supposed to have only store supply and also be lighter, more compact and more accurate than the M249.

In 2006, Colt, H&K and FN were invited to participate in the competition and presented technical requirements for the weapon. The winner was H&K with its NK416, but tests continued for two more years, including in real combat operations in Afghanistan.


M27 IAR


In 2011, H&K received an order for 6500 M27 IAR light machine guns. The number of M249s in the Marine Corps was reduced by the same number. This decision was met with controversy among the troops. Supporters of a full-fledged light machine gun emphasized the impossibility of conducting intensive automatic fire “to suppress” and the inconvenience of loading and replacing 30-seat magazines.

Proponents of the same concept praise the ease, convenience and low impact of new weapons. An important argument is the high accuracy of firing single long-range with good optics.

After tests conducted on the basis of the 2 battalion of the 7 regiment of the marines in a real combat situation, it was concluded that the new weapons are superior to the existing M249.

Prospects


How will the further development of light support weapons go? Most likely, the light machine gun with tape feed will remain as an important component of the infantry weapons. The only question is whether it will remain, as before, the most important weapon of the infantry department, or will it be at least partially replaced by new, automatic rifles adapted for this purpose. Partially this question will be answered by the upcoming replacement of G36 with a new weapon.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sen
    +3
    3 June 2019 08: 29
    Our experience in fighting in Afghanistan and the Caucasus is 7,62 mm PC. The new 5,45 mm light machine gun will go into service only Rosguard.
    1. +2
      3 June 2019 14: 08
      Quote: sen
      The new 5,45 mm light machine gun will go into service only Rosguard.

      You mean RPK-16?

      But there is also Kord 5,45 ("Turner 2") ...

    2. +1
      3 June 2019 15: 41
      But what about RPK-74?
      1. +5
        3 June 2019 17: 46
        Quote: YOUR
        But what about RPK-74?

        I have RPK-74. Already the second about the score. The first died in an unequal struggle with dill ...

        What one, what the other (both 1984 release, Tula,satisfiedIt would not hurt only to have a bar and optics, and a "tambourine" for 96 rounds ...
  2. +4
    3 June 2019 10: 13
    Quote: sen
    7,62 mm PC

    Only not PC, but PKP "Pecheneg".
    1. +2
      3 June 2019 15: 42
      There are not so many PKP "Pecheneg" in the main armament of motorized rifle units is PKM.
  3. +11
    3 June 2019 10: 22
    I do not understand how the Moronxovsky M27 IAR can replace the ribbon machine gun. For individual shooting - all is well.
    And when the machine gunner needs to conduct a defensive fire at 400-700,
    then one turn, when you drive the barrel from side to side - 20 rounds, at least. And the store is only 30. That is, you will have to constantly change stores.
    1. +2
      3 June 2019 11: 23
      Quote: voyaka uh
      then one turn, when you drive the barrel from side to side - 20 rounds, at least. And the store is only 30. That is, you will have to constantly change stores.

      There, neither the barrel nor the power are designed for barrage. Rather, the fire in short bursts of 2-5 rounds, instead of standard single shooting.
      1. +5
        3 June 2019 11: 38
        The barrel, like, they have visually thicker than the M-16. But still inflate it from long lines.
        Marpekhov throws something from one extreme to another. Then they planted as many as three light machine guns in the compartment. A flurry of fire. Everyone is carrying ribbons. This is overkill. Now - remove the light machine guns. If they leave one (like ours) - this is just right.
        So this IAR looks good.
        I once dreamed that my M-16 would be on legs and with a 3-4x wide-angle optical sight. And so: "dream come true"
        laughing )
        1. +1
          3 June 2019 21: 17
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Marpekhov throwing something from one extreme to another

          This is a constant story. How to fight, fire density or single, but accurate fire. Now the ILC has sharply rocked into the exact fire, machine guns in the department have outlived, but the attention to rifle training, they say, has grown sharply. That is, if a person shoots poorly, they do not prescribe two laps of cross-country, but seriously understand how he stands, how he breathes, etc.

          There is also the opinion of strangers that it’s more useful to carry heavy machine guns in the department today, but some Milkor SuperSix MRGL
        2. -1
          21 June 2019 17: 05
          never fired from bipods - really help a lot?
          1. +2
            21 June 2019 21: 07
            And how! Do not strain your muscles while holding your weapon on target.
            Just leaning forward on your butt and arms
            fixed: bipod - shoulder. Hands can be relaxed.
    2. +3
      3 June 2019 15: 44
      They have a different approach to fighting. It is believed that if a soldier shot 4-6 stores, then the battle was not planned properly.
      1. +2
        3 June 2019 17: 33
        We have, like the English. They shoot a little and only single (or cutoffs). Queues of individual weapons are generally prohibited. The lines are only machine guns. But the excess of machine guns in practice leads to chaos in the infantry. Since it is imperative that the backs of their shooters (in the heat of quick dashes) fall into the sector of one of their machine guns. And the officers will not have time to brake the fire.
        In general, light machine guns are useful, but they should not be many.
        1. +2
          4 June 2019 06: 31
          The British Ministry of Defense has decided to replace the infantry weapons. The British military department decided to write off three models of infantry weapons and is now urgently looking for a replacement, reports "Warspot" with reference to the portal ukdefencejournal.org.uk.
          L110A3 LMG machine guns, more commonly known as FN Minimi, fall under the cancellation. The reason for the cancellation is the heavy weight of the machine gun.
          In addition, the British infantry loses the so-called L86A2 Light Support Weapon (LSW) support weapon, which could be used as a light machine gun or as a sniper rifle at close and medium distances. This weapon will be completely replaced by a sniper rifle L129A1, and now this rifle will become standard for all infantry units.
          https://topwar.ru/145451-britanskaja-armija-nachinaet-perevooruzhenie-pehoty.html
        2. 0
          21 June 2019 17: 07
          and how do you arm groups that will sit on defensive positions in conventional "trenches" where the firing range is not less than 100m?
    3. +5
      3 June 2019 18: 14
      I do not understand how the Moronxovsky M27 IAR can replace the ribbon machine gun. For individual shooting - all is well.


      There is a version that it is only on paper replacement. KMP wanted to buy new 416 to replace the M4. But the budget is not rubber and they were refused, because even the army does not buy 416. So they came up with a way to update the arsenal.
    4. 0
      4 June 2019 05: 06
      The amers in the KMP platoon have three machine guns. Minimi Para. M4 rifles. All 5,56 caliber. In the short, everything is fine. But at long distances there are problems. Somewhere in Popenker I read that the M27 is an attempt in a roundabout way to smuggle Marksman rifles into the rank and file. It seems that it did not work out straight, as they wanted a version of a standard rifle with a heavy barrel and under 7,62. And just before that, the ILC had already adopted the FN SCAR. Congress said, "Are you fucking moaning rifle after rifle?" And so it's kind of like a machine gun with a high magnification telescopic sight. One machine gun in a platoon is replaced with an M27 and everything is ok.
      1. +2
        4 June 2019 10: 30
        "Amers in the ILC platoon have three machine guns" ///
        -----
        Not in the platoon, but in the squard squad (!).
        There are 13 people in the department. 3 teams (teams) of 4 people. And the commander. For each team - one light machine gun M249.
        This is overkill. And they decided to leave this.
        1. 0
          4 June 2019 13: 19
          But isn't Squad a platoon?
          1. +1
            4 June 2019 13: 49
            Niht. The platoon is "platoon". hi
            1. 0
              21 June 2019 17: 09
              and a platoon + thick ensign?
  4. +4
    3 June 2019 11: 19
    I immediately got goosebumps and fur on my back from these pictures.

    The language does not dare to call all of the above "light machine guns". Who is against - I can suggest running on a 10 km march with such a "light machine gun" on the hump.

    Do not want anymore...

    stop
    1. +1
      3 June 2019 11: 48
      Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
      The language does not dare to call all of the above "light machine guns". Who is against - I can suggest running on a 10 km march with such a "light machine gun" on the hump.

      What's the problem? I ran with a total mass of weapons and ammunition up to 8 kg 15 km. More dependent on equipment. In poor equipment, legs can be killed so that a person will not be able to walk for a week.
      The biathlete’s neighbor has a combat rifle weighing about 2 kg, but the training rifle is already 4. And nothing, she wears it normally, although she constantly knocks on her back — I wouldn’t be able to, although it is heavier than that.
      1. +7
        3 June 2019 12: 42
        Well, Duc, there’s a lot of youth running like this, but, like me, didn’t get any special pleasure from this.

        Personally, at 53, I no longer want to repeat such an experience.

        stop
        1. +2
          3 June 2019 13: 09
          Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
          Personally, at 53, I no longer want to repeat such an experience.

          Yes, you are a cool person, if you are capable of it at 53 years old. good drinks
          Many of my classmates have never been able to.
          1. +2
            3 June 2019 13: 48
            Alas, I ran back to my youth, I no longer run.

            drinks

            So, only in super-sprint IPSC ... and then either from a pistol or from a pistol caliber "carbine".
            1. +6
              3 June 2019 22: 01
              Hi, man! drinks Here I am reading you and my dear Young Lady, and involuntarily a "seditious" thought creeps into my head that I was really lucky with the service in the SA. Still, on a tank - this is not a run for you! smile
              1. +2
                3 June 2019 22: 10
                Well, this is how the card will fall. Burning in the tank is not pleasant enough, pah-pah-pah through the left.

                In the heat without an air conditioner, in the cold - carry batteries, when shooting - sniff gunpowder. Tanks are not mine. I, over there, could hardly fit in my "Seagull" KShM-145 in the radio room. Large. And if, God forbid, wounded and in the winter - hell, you get out of there yourself.

                drinks
                1. +7
                  3 June 2019 22: 46
                  Carrying batteries, and even a log for self-extraction - yes, especially in the cold. But in the same winter during the exercises: we left where we were ordered, got up, we did not turn off the engine, the crew lay down with cigarettes in the engine compartment, and even covered ourselves with tarpaulin from above - buzz! Nearby, infantry shovels in the snow and swallows the snot.
                  1. +3
                    3 June 2019 22: 59
                    ! A number of infantry shovels in the snow picks and snot swallows.

                    ,, the commander drove you a little, would make once the position equip ,, tank in a trench ,,. laughing in the winter ,, with a stringing tool ,,
                    1. +2
                      3 June 2019 23: 02
                      A self-digging tool for the tank should be of help.
                    2. +3
                      3 June 2019 23: 07
                      And we had BTU for this, and it happened only twice in three years. We were there for the support of the URA and the border guards. It took us no more than half an hour to walk from the PPD to the Amur, and then I went into battle, what kind of "trenches with all-round fire" are there. Fights, however, did not happen here. But the Chinese "little brothers" called us nothing more than Separate Punitive Tank Regiment under the command of Colonel Skew, they were having so much fun on the air. And our commander's name was I.A.Kosenko, and he had the Order of the Red Banner for Moravian Ostrava. hi
      2. 0
        4 June 2019 04: 02
        Respect and respect ... I am a medical service, and in our Far East it’s forbidden over personnel ...
    2. 0
      21 June 2019 17: 11
      Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
      run 10 km on a march with such a "light machine gun" on the hump

      biathlon ran with a breeze, but without pleasure. I'm tired of getting the barrel at the back of my head.
  5. +5
    3 June 2019 16: 40
    Thank. Hello everyone hi
    Stoner 63 A was a light machine gun with gas automation and tape power.
    XM249 (FN MINIMI), Belgium
    This light machine gun was introduced to the Belgian army back in 1974 and passed the tests.
    ... the Belgian FN MINIMI with the SS109 cartridge had an advantage and was recommended for adoption in the NATO armies.
    Some armies needed a compact light machine gun to arm paratroopers and crews of military vehicles.
    In 2004, the light machine gun was adopted by the Bundeswehr under the designation MG4
    In 2011, H&K received an order for 6500 M27 IAR light machine guns.
    1. +6
      3 June 2019 21: 55
      Sanchez hi , It’s time for you to take half of the fee from the authors. It will be honest. drinks
      1. +1
        4 June 2019 08: 36
        what ... Yes, well ... I'm an altruist
  6. +1
    3 June 2019 18: 42
    The determining factor in the choice of light machine guns is not their design, but the way of feeding cartridges - tape or magazine.

    The first provides an increase in the weight of the cartridge only 0,5 grams (plastic tape link), the second - 5 grams (the weight of the store in terms of one cartridge). At the same time, the reload rate of the tape is at the level of 30 seconds, the magazine is at the level of 3 seconds.

    The target is to develop a tape receiver that provides tape reload time at the store recharge level.
  7. +5
    3 June 2019 18: 50
    Quote: voyaka uh
    We, like the British. Shoot a little and only single (or cut-offs). The queues of individual weapons are generally prohibited.

    Swooping around like US marines in Afghanistan, who were also trained to fire single-handed in response to firing in bursts from the Taliban laughing

    1. +2
      3 June 2019 21: 56
      In vain you laugh, they have just everything in order.
    2. 0
      9 June 2019 09: 45
      in the comments they write that the video is fake
  8. 0
    3 June 2019 21: 18
    Small Automatic Weapon "(SAW).


    Probably more accurate is the Squad Automatic Weapon. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squad_automatic_weapon) The name is absolutely idiotic for my taste. Yes, and an abbreviation. There is a simple understandable "light machine gun", in their words Light Machine Gun, in the heat of battle, a soldier can simply shout "mashingan", which exhaustively and accurately determines which weapon is meant. Why fog up?
  9. +2
    4 June 2019 12: 02
    The Americans thought of the PKK! Amazing Just amazing!
    1. 0
      4 June 2019 16: 55
      Quote: the47th
      The Americans thought of the PKK! Amazing Just amazing!

      To this and went. Something very long.
    2. 0
      6 June 2019 08: 24
      Well, in fairness it must be said that before the need for something, akin to the RPD, they thought of it back in 60's. And in the 70-x advanced even a little further - the requirements of the program SAW included quick-change barrel. And the PKK, like the M27 IAR, is already decadence, a step backwards.
  10. 0
    7 June 2019 19: 21
    What kind of puns? Support weapons, low-pulse cartridge IKS-M is there. etc. pathos, they like to pour over from empty to empty. MANUAL MACHINE, that's all!
  11. 0
    7 June 2019 19: 28
    Quote: dokusib
    But isn't Squad a platoon?

    this branch
  12. 0
    7 June 2019 23: 08
    Quote: Operator
    who were also trained to shoot single in response to shooting bursts

    Demonstrative video.
    But the teaching methodology still did not change.
    Something is wrong with them, or the cartridges are cherished, or all the hope for optics, night vision devices, dreams that they will find and neutralize the enemy earlier.
  13. 0
    21 June 2019 17: 12
    Quote: bubalik
    in the winter ,, with a stringing tool ,,

    Well, by the spring we’d have time

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"