SU-57 (T48). Self-made lend-lease

19
Already in November 1941, the Soviet Union joined the Lend-Lease program, according to which the United States supplied its allies with military equipment, ammunition, strategic materials for the military industry, medicines, food, and another list of military goods. As part of the implementation of this program, the USSR also received armored vehicles, initially from the UK, then from the USA, for example, until 1945, Soviet troops received 3664 tank "Sherman" of various modifications. But among the armored vehicles supplied by the Red Army there were much rarer vehicles, the T48 anti-tank self-propelled guns based on the M3 half-tracked armored personnel carrier are rightly referred to such specific samples.

Initially, this self-propelled gun was created in the United States by order of the British military, and was immediately intended to be supplied under the Lend-Lease program. From December 1942 to May 1943, the Diamond T Motor Car Company workshops left the 962 anti-tank self-propelled guns T48. By this time, the British military lost interest in the installation, and the USSR agreed to supply this vehicle, becoming the largest operator of PT-SAU T48, which received a new index SU-57. In total, the Soviet Union received 650 self-propelled guns of this type, the machines were actively used by Soviet troops as part of separate self-propelled artillery brigades and motorcycle battalions and armored reconnaissance companies.



Т48 from idea to implementation


Already at the very beginning of the Second World War, a mixed British-American Arms Commission began its work in the United States. The commission’s task was to draw up a program for the development, design, and production of various types and types of military equipment. One such model was the 57-mm self-propelled gun based on the chassis of the M3 semi-tracked armored personnel carrier common in the US Army. On the basis of M2 and M3 armored personnel carriers, American designers designed a large number of self-propelled anti-aircraft installations, self-propelled installations with different artillery weapons, as well as self-propelled mortars. Some of them were manufactured by the American industry in fairly large batches; the vehicle based on semi-tracked armored personnel carriers adopted the US Army and the armies of the allied anti-Hitler coalition countries.


57-mm QF 6-pounder anti-tank gun


The possibility of using the chassis of an armored personnel carrier as a base for different types of weapons was liked by the English military. They showed interest in creating a tank destroyer based on the M3, which would be armed with the British QF 6-pounder anti-tank gun. This British anti-tank 57-mm gun was actively used during World War II, both on the wheeled carriage and as the main armament of armored cars and tanks of the British army. The guns debuted in North Africa, this happened during the April 1942 battles. The gun was also appreciated by the Americans, who adopted the British cannon by slightly modernizing the 57-mm gun, in the US Army the artillery system was held under the designation М1.

An armor-piercing projectile of the specified weapon from a distance of 900 meters punched up to 73 mm armor steel, located at an angle of inclination 60 degrees. For the 1942 of the year, these were acceptable numbers, but with the advent of new German tanks and the strengthening of the frontal booking of existing combat vehicles, the effectiveness of the 57-mm British anti-tank gun only decreased. The choice of this particular instrument for installation on the M3 armored personnel carrier was due to the fact that the British wanted to get equipment that would be comparable in terms of weaponry to their own, for example, Valentine and Churchill tanks. It was the gun that was the main and only armament of anti-tank self-propelled guns on the chassis of a semi-tracked armored personnel carrier, but in the combat units of the machine they could also be equipped with machine guns for self-defense.

The first copy of the new anti-tank self-propelled entered for the test program at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in April 1942. Armed with an adapted version of the British 6-pound (57-mm) gun armored car received the designation T48 - 57 mm Gun Motor Carriage. Already in October 1942, the American order for a new self-propelled gun was canceled, in the United States drew attention to the new artillery systems caliber 75 mm and tracked self-propelled guns. At the same time, the release of the new ACS under the British order continued, mass production was launched in December 1942 of the year. The assembly of cars involved the company Diamond T Motor Company. However, the British also lost interest in the 1943, the new British self-propelled gun, who realized that it was ineffective against the newest German medium and heavy tanks, and in the UK developed a new 17-pound gun (76,2-mm) QF 17 pounder, which became the best anti-tank a tool of the allies, having received an armor-piercing piercing projectile with a separating tray.


Half-track armored vehicle M3


As a result, the newly developed self-propelled gun was unnecessary to the main customers, the British received only 30 48 vehicles, and the Americans limited themselves to purchasing one anti-tank ACS, and they simply converted 282 ready-made self-propelled units back to M3-X1 armored vehicles. But the remaining 650 pieces found refuge in the USSR, the Soviet military showed interest in this car and ordered it as part of the lend-lease deliveries, the 241 car arrived in the Soviet Union in 1943, and 409 in 1944. However, only in the USSR, this anti-tank self-propelled gun was used for its intended purpose until the end of hostilities.

Design features SAU T48


The layout and appearance of the American self-propelled unit T48 were traditional for vehicles on such a base. Similar combat vehicles were available in the arsenal of the German army. The Germans also equipped their Sd Kfz 251 semi-tracked armored personnel carriers, known as the “Ganomag”, with artillery systems of various calibers: 37-mm anti-tank guns, short-barreled 75-mm guns, and by the end of the war and 75-mm long-barreled guns. Perhaps, having become acquainted with such combat vehicles at the front, the Soviet military decided to get their own counterpart, which led to the supply of 650 anti-tank SAU from the United States. In the Soviet Union, the car received a new designation SU-57. It is worth noting that our own armored personnel carriers in the USSR were not produced at all, therefore such equipment as a whole was of great interest for the Red Army.

The layout of the anti-tank self-propelled, built on the basis of the chassis of a semi-tracked armored personnel carrier, could be called a classic. The body of the self-propelled unit was distinguished by the simplicity of its forms and lines, the box-shaped design with vertically arranged sides and the stern walls was assembled using armor plates mounted on the frame from the corners. In the manufacture of self-propelled Т48 self-propelled guns were widely used commercial vehicles, mainly in the government and in the transmission. In front of the hull there was an engine hidden under an armored hood, behind it was the driver's cabin. At the same time, the American designers borrowed the hood part and cab from the Scout Car M3A1 wheeled reconnaissance armored vehicle that was supplied to the USSR and became the most massive BTR of the Red Army during the Second World War.

SU-57 (T48). Self-made lend-lease


The self-propelled armored hull of the top was opened and was distinguished by anti-bullet armor, the thickness of the armor of the front hull sheets reached 13 mm, and in general, armored steel sheets with a thickness of 6,5 mm were used in the design of the combat vehicle. The 57-mm M1 American anti-tank gun, which received a semi-automatic vertical wedge gate, was installed in the open body. The gun was installed on the machine T-5, which was placed in front of the hull immediately behind the control compartment. The gun was installed in a shelter sheltered from above with precipitation with a box-shaped shield that defended the calculation from bullets and shell fragments; the ammunition load amounted to 99 shells. The gun had excellent horizontal pointing angles - 56 degrees, vertical tool pointing angles ranged from -5 to + 16 degrees. Three types of unitary shots were used for firing 57-mm donuts: two armor-piercing (thick-headed tracer and sharp-headed tracer) projectile and a fragmentation grenade. At a distance of 500 meters, the gun allowed the calculation to punch up to 81 mm of armor (at a meeting angle of 60 degrees).

The 6 carburetor 160AH engine, developing 147 hp power, was a true heart of the self-propelled unit; a bit of a weaker engine — International RED-450-B; developing 141 hp power — was installed on some machines. Weak firepower and lack of armor were compensated by good mobility and speed. With a combat weight of about 8 tons, this engine provided the machine with specific power at the level of 17,1 hp. per ton. When driving on the SAU highway, the T48 accelerated to the speed of 72 km / h, the power reserve of the self-propelled gun was estimated at 320 km.



The front wheels of the self-propelled unit were steering. In relation to each side, the Lend-Lev self-propelled crawler propulsion unit consisted of four double rubberized support rollers, the rollers were combined in pairs into two balance carts. On the part of the self-propelled guns in the front of the body was placed single drum winch. At the same time on some combat vehicles, the winch was changed to a buffer drum with a diameter of 310 mm. With such a device, the ACS patency increased, the presence of a drum facilitated the process of overcoming scaffolds, ditches and trenches up to the 1,8 meter wide.

Features of the combat use of the SU-57


The semi-tracked chassis and low weight provided the anti-tank self-propelled gun with good cross-country ability even on weak soils and snow. In this case, self-propelled gun predictably lost in control. When turning the front wheels, the combat vehicle was not always ready to get into the necessary direction of movement. In fairness it should be noted that similar shortcomings were inherent in the German semi-tracked armored personnel carriers. An open battle with the enemy’s tanks left the T48 self-propelled guns no chance of success. The use of ACS data from ambushes and pre-reinforced positions was considered effective. At the same time, approximately for such actions on the battlefield, a new combat vehicle was originally created.

By the 1943, the 57-mm gun had problems in fighting the new German Tiger and Panther tanks. At the same time she pierced the frontal armor of medium German tanks Pz.IV modifications G and H, it was possible to hit the Tiger or even the Ferdinand self-propelled gun, it was possible to board the hull. From a distance of 200 meters, one could try to hit the Tiger or the Panther directly in the forehead, but with such actions without a well-prepared and disguised position, it was a one-way ticket. It can be noted that with certain limitations, often very significant, the self-propelled gun still coped with its duties by actively participating in the battles on the Eastern Front.



If armor penetration made it possible to hit enemy equipment, albeit with a lot of restrictions, the impact of 57-mm guns on infantry and field fortifications was very weak. For the destruction of prepared defense lines and fortifications, such a weapon was not suitable. The power of 57-high-explosive high-explosive ordnance was clearly insufficient. The high-explosive shot of a similar gun weighed only 3,3 kg, and the mass of explosive was only 45 grams.

Lend-lease anti-tank self-propelled guns, which received the designation SU-57, were widely used in three separate self-propelled artillery brigades, each of which had 60-65 combat vehicles of this type. SU-57 were regular weapons for the 16, 19 and 22 (later 70 Guards) self-propelled artillery brigades, which fought in the 3, 1 and 4 of the Guards tank armies, respectively. In the Red Army, American self-propelled guns were also used by battalion and sub-divisional, in which case they were included in the composition of motorcycle battalions and separate reconnaissance companies on armored vehicles. In such units, ACS T48 were used particularly effectively, acting in its direct role - a semi-tracked armored personnel carrier with a reinforced armament complex.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    31 May 2019 18: 46
    ,, The Germans, in my opinion, did not throw anything.
    1. +1
      8 June 2019 01: 41
      So this is, come on, in Africa, and there they would be glad to receive any present. The supply was tight. And the Germans fought from one British fuel depot to another. I think they had no problems with captured parts and ammunition either.
      And the machine, apparently, was better than the German Demag.
      1. +1
        8 June 2019 16: 07
        Catfish
        hi ,, like in Tunisia.
  2. Alf
    +8
    31 May 2019 19: 07
    When turning the front wheels, the combat vehicle was not always ready to get out to the necessary direction of movement. In fairness, it is worth noting that similar shortcomings were inherent in the German half-track armored personnel carriers.

    The opposite is true.
    American armored personnel carriers suffered from this drawback much less due to the front drive axle.
    1. 0
      4 June 2019 19: 26
      The Hanomaghs could also turn caterpillars (on the tank) ...
  3. +12
    31 May 2019 19: 33
    I remembered a little about our experiments!
    Self-propelled guns ZIS-41

    Thanks to Sergey for the essay on SAU-57. To be honest, for me she remained a ghost machine for a long time. Since it was mentioned in the documents, but not really TTX, there was no description of it in the books of the late USSR!
    So thanks again!
    Regards, Vlad!
    1. +1
      31 May 2019 19: 47
      Kote Pane Kohanka (Vladislav) Today, 20: 33

      Vladislav hi Do you think this product (SU-57) took part in the Far East against the Japanese?
      1. +2
        31 May 2019 20: 56
        Good evening Sergey!
        Alas, to be honest I don’t know. Here it is necessary to carry out a sensible analysis of what was dragged from technology across the country in July and August 1945 to the east!
        By the way, captured equipment was thrown all in Germany, Austria and Hungary! The same Panthers and Ganomags who used our divisions remained where they found the end of the war!
        Although perhaps there was another option for the appearance of the SU-57 in the Far East - through the Pacific Ocean. But there is one thing, but all deliveries of the SU-57 to the USSR passed from 1943 to 1944!
        Although I am troubled by a vague doubt that I somewhere met the mention of the SUD-57 in the war with Japan! But I can’t say something! It is necessary to do a banal analysis. Who on May 9, 1945, “57” remained and with what they were going down to the Far East.
        Regards, Vlad!
      2. +1
        1 June 2019 01: 56
        The English Wikipedia page does not mention application in the Far East.
        The Soviets called it the SU-57 (Samokhodnaya ustanovka 57); under this designation it served in Operation Bagration and other fighting on the Eastern Front during World War II.

        Operation Bagration and other battles on the Eastern Front.
        although, of course, this is not proof.
  4. +2
    31 May 2019 19: 33
    Already in November 1941, the Soviet Union joined the Lend-Lease program.

    From 01.10.1941/XNUMX/XNUMX.
    and the USSR agreed to supply this machine,

    Still would. For the level of Soviet artillery, 6 pounds was very much nothing.
    If the armor penetration allowed hitting the enemy’s equipment, albeit with a large number of restrictions, the impact of the 57-mm guns on the infantry and field fortifications was very weak. Such a weapon was not suitable for the destruction of prepared defense lines and fortifications. The power of the 57 mm high-explosive fragmentation ammunition was clearly insufficient.

    At the level of the Soviet 76 mm OS O-350A wartime. Those. approximately, like the T-34/76.
    But the armor penetration of 57 mm 6 pounds was noticeably better than 76 mm F-34.
    A high-explosive fragmentation shot of such a gun weighed only 3,3 kg, and the mass of the explosive was only 45 grams.

    From 2,85 to 2,97 (these are British models, later American ones were a bit heavier).
    The weight of the explosive was about 1,06 kg. TNT at all.
    1. +2
      1 June 2019 01: 49
      A high-explosive fragmentation shot of such a gun weighed only 3,3 kg, and the mass of the explosive was only 45 grams.

      it is armor-piercing, not high explosive.
      Brand - APC-T M86 Projectile
      1. +1
        1 June 2019 09: 27
        Yes, 45g of explosives in a fragmentation shell - somehow it would have come out very little. In theory, 300 grams should be.
        1. +1
          1 June 2019 10: 34
          Quote: CTABEP
          In theory, 300 grams should be.

          From 186 to 241 g.
    2. +2
      1 June 2019 09: 43
      At the level of the Soviet 76 mm OS O-350A wartime

      So you compared a high-explosive fragmentation shell to a purely fragmentation shell?
      Why not with OF 350?
      You claim that a projectile weighing less than 3 kg in terms of RP impact is the same as a projectile weighing more than 6 kg.
      Well you give.
      From 2,85 to 2,97 (these are British models, later American ones were a bit heavier).
      The weight of the explosive was about 1,06 kg. TNT at all

      And explain how you managed to cram more than 1 kg of TNT into a shell weighing less than 3 kg
      This is not a shell, but an aerial bomb.
      Strongly not looking, but fast - Shell Mk.10 - 153 gr! TNT. You were mistaken almost an order of magnitude.
      1. +1
        1 June 2019 10: 31
        Quote: Yuri_999
        oh have you compared a high-explosive fragmentation shell with a purely fragmentation shell?

        Those. I compared shells of the same purpose.
        Quote: Yuri_999
        Why not with OF 350?

        Because during the war they were not there.
        Quote: Yuri_999
        You claim that a projectile weighing less than 3 kg in terms of RP impact is the same as a projectile weighing more than 6 kg.

        Yes, a shell weighing 3 kg equipped with about 190 g of trotyl in terms of fragmentation is equivalent to a shell weighing 6,21 kg equipped with 490 g of ammatol A-80, or even A-90 with trotyl stopper.
        Quote: Yuri_999
        Well you give.

        Teach materiel.
        Quote: Yuri_999
        And explain how you managed to cram more than 1 kg of TNT into a shell weighing less than 3 kg

        The numbers are mixed up there. This is the weight of the propellant charge. The weight of explosives in different 57 mm OFS was from 186 to 241 g.
        Quote: Yuri_999
        Shell Mk.10 - 153 gr! TNT.

        Mark XT: weight 2.98 kg total; 186 g H.E.
        1. 0
          2 June 2019 00: 15
          Yeah, that is, "not 10, and not in preference ..........
          "
          Those. I compared shells of the same purpose.

          Where did you get the idea that fragmentation and high-explosive fragmentation are the same shells?
          A high-explosive fragmentation can be both high-explosive and high-explosive, but a high-explosive fragmentation cannot be high-explosive.
          A manual offensive grenade has almost only a high-explosive action, while a defensive one has a high-explosive fragmentation. Are these the same grenades? (Exaggerated).
          Because during the war they were not there.

          At the same time, HE shells are always mentioned in the description of 76,2mm ammunition, but I did not find pure fragmentation shells (O-350A). According to the description of the "diggers" and the links to the device of the shots, there is also the mass of the OF 350 and the absence of O 350A. So the statement that O 350A was, and OF 350 was not - requires proof. (Well, or links).
          Yes, a shell weighing under 3 kg equipped with about 190 g of trotyl in terms of fragmentation is equivalent to a shell weighing 6,21 kg equipped with 490 g of ammatol A-80

          That is, you say that the TNT equivalent of the BB of the O-350A shell was only 0,39. How so, if with simple ammonium nitrate it is already 0,42 (https://dpva.ru/Guide/GuideChemistry/burningandexolisions/DdetonationSpeedandREtnt/)
          And ammotol wins by high-explosive action.
          By the way, why exactly the A-80?
          At the same time, for some reason you indicate the weight of explosives - 490 grams, but in the O-350a its 540 grams. And in OF-350 it already has 710. Maybe 490 is just the TNT equivalent?
          And you completely forget about the number and mass of fragments.
          Teach materiel.

          I am not an ammunition specialist. But even I was struck by the inconsistency of the numbers. And you, declaring yourself a "specialist", wrote garbage
          The weight of the explosive was about 1,06 kg. TNT at all.
          , so learn the materiel yourself, or re-read what you write.
          However, considering how many mistakes and sketches you made in two messages, it became clear to me what kind of "expert" you are.
    3. +1
      1 June 2019 10: 33
      Quote: Urfin22
      The weight of the explosive was about 1,06 kg. TNT at all.

      Amendment is the weight of the propellant charge.
      Explosive weight from 186 to 241 g. Most often, in non-elongated shells, 186 g.
  5. +6
    31 May 2019 19: 59
    hi Thank you.
    ... When driving on a highway, the T48 self-propelled gun accelerated to a speed of 72 km / h, the range of a self-propelled gun was estimated at 320 km.
    T12 / M3 Gun Motor Carriage ”, a modified half-track M-3 With a 75 mm M1897A4 cannon. “The idea of ​​such a thinly armored vehicle opposing armored tanks may seem insane today, but the doctrine of an army tank destroyer at the time was 'shoot and run', where fast moving anti-tank vehicles would impede the advance of enemy armor by firing from closed positions, quickly retreating. and then repeating the process, destroying the enemy When they attempted to face off against German tanks at the Kasserine Pass in Tunisia, the results were disastrous, but as predicted they could be effective against Axis tanks at the start of the war.
    The M3s were soon replaced by the more efficient M10s in Europe, but were successfully used against the more lightly armored Japanese forces in the Far East and the Pacific Theater of War throughout the war, often as mobile artillery. Highlights of the film include field maintenance, shooting and field maneuvers .... hi
  6. +6
    1 June 2019 16: 53
    From combat use, I remembered:

    "With great success, the SU-57 self-propelled guns were used as part of reconnaissance groups of brigades and corps, essentially in the role of an armored personnel carrier with reinforced artillery weapons. In accordance with the instructions for using the SU-57 in the Red Army, its small arms ) was one DP or DT machine gun (since there was no American machine gun) and three PPSh assault rifles.
    On January 14, 1945, the 6th separate Cherkasy Order of Bohdan Khmelnitsky, 11th degree, a motorcycle regiment (1st Guards Tank Army, 1st Belorussian Front), while crossing the Odzuvol River (Poland), caught up with the outgoing German convoy, in the rear of which there were several “Panthers” ". In the regiment, in addition to two hundred motorcycles, there was a tank company of Valentine IX tanks of 10 vehicles, an artillery division of two-armed personnel of 8 self-propelled guns SU-57, a battery of 76-mm ZIS-3 guns, which were towed by an MZA1 Scout car, and machine-gun company "Maxim" (12 pieces) installed on the "Willis", and a company of machine gunners on 13 armored personnel carriers MZA1.
    After a brief meeting, it was decided not to hit the “tail”, but the “head” of the column, having previously cut off the Germans from the crossing.
    The commander of the 6th separate motorcycle regiment, V. N. Musatov, allocated for the operation the Dolgopolov tank company (Valentine IX) of six vehicles and the SU-57 division, landing assault rifles on armored personnel carriers. Major Ivanov was appointed to lead the group.
    At full speed, bypassing the column from the flank across the field, Soviet tanks and self-propelled guns seized the bridge and hit the head of the column. The Germans rose a terrible turmoil. The shooting started. Cars turned left into an open field, but there were many ditches. Throwing cars, the Germans began to run away, running already to the right to the forest. And then they were hit by machine guns of ripened motorcyclists ... The Panthers, marching in the rearguard of the column, did not get involved in the battle and hastened to leave the river, finding a ford.
    Since the German units were scattered, it was necessary to calculate the trophies and report on the results of the battle to a higher command. But the 1st Guards Tank Army was continuously advancing to the West, and the regiment was supposed to provide reconnaissance on one of its flanks. Therefore, a simple and clear report was sent to the army headquarters: "The regiment defeated the enemy column of 5 kilometers in length."

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"