Gasparyan: In the Crimea, "ogrebali" everyone who came there

29
NATO once again called on Russia to leave the Crimea. NATO, which itself is not going to leave, for example, Kosovo, considers itself entitled to give advice to Russia on how we should act on our own territories.

Gasparyan: In the Crimea, "ogrebali" everyone who came there




Comment on the statements from representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance is the journalist Armen Gasparyan.

We are urged to return to the status quo. We might even be happy. But the Russians never leave the World Cup. And the Crimea is the place where for many centuries the World Rowing Championships are held in the sense that everyone who came there gathered in the Crimea. It is not in our tradition to desert from the ring.


In NATO, and mainly in the United States, they can’t come to terms with the fact that the Crimea, to which they pinned great North Atlantic hopes, was lost by them. Hence the constant attempts to force Russia to “give Crimea to Ukraine,” and in fact transfer it to NATO, to the United States of America. They cannot afford to go into open armed conflict, if only for the reason that there is no single “anti-Russian front” in NATO, and therefore the methods are sanctions, fakes, anti-Russian propaganda.

A full commentary by Armen Gasparyan on the NATO requirements for Russia in the Crimea is in the video:

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    24 May 2019 08: 25
    Crimea is ours, Russian! Everything, discussions are superfluous. And let them leave the calls to give for themselves.
    1. 0
      24 May 2019 09: 47
      NATO calls on Russia ... to liquidate the Black Sea Fleet.
      I will explain:
      About 50% were in Poti-Georgia.
      More than 30% were in Sevastopol, Odessa, Nikolaev / Ochakovo.
      What happened in Batumi, Kherson.
      Only Sevastopol remained.
      Novorossiysk is not rubber-based and border guards are based there.
      1. +1
        24 May 2019 11: 32
        Quote: knn54
        About 50% were in Poti-Georgia

        what What was there?
        1. 0
          24 May 2019 11: 51
          Divisions: anti-submarine ships, minesweepers, landing, training. A separate helicopter regiment of PLO ... "Krupnyak" was in the Crimea.
          % composition by quantity, not by class.
          1. 0
            24 May 2019 13: 44
            Quote: knn54
            Divisions: anti-submarine ships, minesweepers, landing, training. Separate helicopter regiment PLO

            5 MPK, 5 minesweepers, 2 raid minesweepers, 1 SKR, 1 artillery boat, 1 torpedo boat, 1 missile boat, 8 landing boats, 1 PKZ, 2 UTS, 3 cord stacker ??? Fear God !!!
            Quote: knn54
            "Krupnyak" was in the Crimea.

            Just a grain?
      2. 0
        25 May 2019 12: 10
        Quote: knn54
        Sevastopol, Odessa, Nikolaev / Ochakovo.

        Did Donuzlav and kvass eat? And there was a regiment of seaplanes, landing ships, marines and much more. And the bay is one of the best in the Black Sea, along with Sevastopol and Balaklava.
    2. +1
      24 May 2019 10: 01
      NATO has once again called on Russia to leave Crimea.

      The fox, in the old fashioned way, wants to lure the crow into cheese. But the crow is not the same and wise experience!
      We missed a lot, the countries of the former socialist camp, the Union republics dissatisfied fled, but no one else will take the Crimea, at least with us!
  2. +4
    24 May 2019 08: 29
    NATO, give Kosovo to Serbia !!!
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      24 May 2019 09: 12
      in vain you are so ... Gasparyan, if you put aside the excessive ism, a very interesting publicist and journalist
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. -1
          24 May 2019 14: 04
          Apparently, for you, the Jews - this is some kind of personal question. :)
          I don’t know about his mother, he’s obviously an Armenian by his father — Sumbatovich’s middle name. Sumbat (Smbat) - Armenian male name.
  4. +1
    24 May 2019 08: 32
    Yes, if we go to an open armed conflict, it means again raking in full, but perhaps already all of Europe. Not much will seem. In the West, they understand perfectly well that anything can be done in language, but not in any way. good
    1. +2
      24 May 2019 08: 49
      Chernomyrdin is good about the language - "The government is not the body where, as many people think, only language can do it."
  5. -7
    24 May 2019 08: 34
    Regarding NATO’s requirements for Russia in the Crimea, this is all clear. Let’s bring life in the Crimea to the right level. Five years have passed, and it is impossible to acquire property legally, prices, roads, unemployment, bureaucracy, mismanagement.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      24 May 2019 08: 50
      unclear!! we don’t teach anyone how to live in their own country, let them roll away from us
    3. +2
      24 May 2019 09: 13
      My friend from Nizhnevartovsk is already buying a second apartment. The first in Sevastopol and the second in Feodosia. It is completely legal.
    4. -2
      24 May 2019 11: 52
      I was in Crimea, you can buy everything, real estate too, people are very satisfied. So that our Crimea, Russian, and no one dares to take it from us.
  6. +3
    24 May 2019 08: 34
    About the rowing championship is beautifully said!
  7. -4
    24 May 2019 08: 39
    And Crimea is the place where for many centuries the World Rowing Championships have been held in the sense that everyone who came there was rowed in the Crimea.
    And who raked interestingly ?! Judging by the number of peoples who settled it, at different times, it was the local population who was raking off ... Some kind of stupid, populist headline
  8. -1
    24 May 2019 08: 45
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    And Crimea is the place where for many centuries the World Rowing Championships have been held in the sense that everyone who came there was rowed in the Crimea.
    And who raked interestingly ?!


    Rowed everyone who came there ...
    1. -3
      24 May 2019 09: 02
      The Crimean Tatars really rounded up when the Nogai Tatars came to cut them, by order of Catherine II.
    2. 0
      24 May 2019 09: 35
      Quote: We_Smart
      Rowed everyone who came there ...
      in the 20th century, the Red Army knocked out the White Guards, after the Germans knocked out the Red Army in the Crimea, and then the Red Army knocked out the Germans ... In past centuries, Tatars, Goths, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Genoese, the Crimean War were again knocked out and so on and so on ... history would not hurt to know, otherwise I guess one TV, in the form of Kiselev, Skabeeva, Solovyov, etc. fellow
  9. +1
    24 May 2019 08: 52
    but forgot about the Crimean War? there was not much raking there, despite the heroism
    1. -1
      24 May 2019 13: 38
      I just wanted to note the same thing ... the author forgot how Russia lost its fleet in the Black Sea?
  10. +1
    24 May 2019 09: 43
      Crimea is Russia, but it’s absolutely not a topic of empty bluster.
    The British and French in Crimea in the middle of the nineteenth century achieved their own, and the country otgrebla, thanks to the chatterers of the publicists and the mediocre management of Emperor Nicholas I. It is necessary not to promote, but to engage in system management, including the sun.
  11. 0
    24 May 2019 10: 21
    Gasparyan - RESPECT !!
  12. 0
    24 May 2019 16: 31
    In the middle of the 19 century, the British and French in the Crimea did not rake. This is not to fight with the lazy Turks.
    1. 0
      25 May 2019 09: 24
      Quote: NF68
      In the middle of the 19 century, the British and French in the Crimea did not rake

      You look at the losses and then you say. They would have fought there a year or two and nothing would have remained of the army. Yes, formally Russia lost the war but Crimea remained Russian. This is not even half of Sakhalin surrendered to the Japanese
      1. 0
        26 May 2019 16: 15
        Quote: Pilat2009
        Quote: NF68
        In the middle of the 19 century, the British and French in the Crimea did not rake

        You look at the losses and then you say. They would have fought there a year or two and nothing would have remained of the army. Yes, formally Russia lost the war but Crimea remained Russian. This is not even half of Sakhalin surrendered to the Japanese


        The data on the losses of the parties in different sources are quite different. Russia lost its fleet. Well, it would have happened in battles with the allies. Themselves flooded. Then Rossi was banned from having a fleet in the Black Sea. In Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, the balance of forces was clearly in favor of the allies, but the "successes" of the allies were much more modest. It would be more correct to say: the allies did not have a bad shot there, although they should not have shot.
  13. -1
    25 May 2019 13: 06
    Zelensky decided to return Crimea to Ukraine, There is an option- Ukrainian region of the Republic of Crimea of ​​the Russian Federation, Only so!