The UN called on the UK to return the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius

The United Nations General Assembly, by a majority vote, adopted a resolution calling on Britain to transfer control of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean to the northeast of Mauritius. The resolution is a recommendation.

UK Permanent Representative to the UN Karen Pierce

The resolution adopted by a majority vote implies that the UK will soon transfer control of the Chagos Islands group, which is an integral part of Mauritius. The document states that the separation of the archipelago from the island of Mauritius occurred without the "free and genuine will of the people."

116 countries voted for the document, including Russia, six were against, including the United States.

The proposal to withdraw the colonial administration from the archipelago within six months and return it to Mauritius provoked a negative reaction from the United Kingdom Permanent Representative to the UN Karen Pearce. The British representative said that she was disappointed with the results of the voting and explained that "this is a matter of bilateral relations, and it does not need to be submitted for international discussion."

Mauritius was a British colony with 1814 and gained independence in 1968. However, in the 1965 year, London separated the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius, thereby leaving it under its control. In 1966, Britain transferred the largest island to the United States, deported all residents from there. The United States built its airbase on the island and in 2016 year they extended the island's lease agreement to London for another 20 years.

Requirements of former residents of the island to return them to the land in the UK ignored, saying that the expelled islanders will never receive permission to return "to British territories."

Comments

[Fedor Sokolov]

Yesterday, only the British representative in NATO tore the hair at the fifth point demanding that Russia return Crimea to Ukraine, and now we’ll see how quickly the British return the Chagos Mauritius archipelago.

[Narcolog]

"This leg - who needs a leg!" (from)

[Tatyana]

The proposal to withdraw colonial administration from the archipelago within six months and return it to Mauritius provoked a negative reaction from British Permanent Representative to the United Nations Karen Pierce. The British spokesman said she was disappointed with the results of the vote and explained that "this is a bilateral issue and should not be brought up for international discussion."

Karen Pearce, UK's Permanent Representative to the UN, is a British goat with a two-horned DOUBLE standard.
With one horn in her face, Britain at the UN attacks other countries - for example, Russia - establishing its own "world order" on the planet, and with the other horn, it does not give back to anyone else, and does not even intend to give it back in fact!

[Den717]

Quote: Tatiana

it is a British "goat" with two-horned DOUBLE standards.

Racism is the essence of the life philosophy of the Anglo-Saxons, the equality of death for them is similar.

[Diana]

Well, show me an example "notdouble standards "! Respect the will of the peoples! Recognize the Republic of Kosovo and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus !!

[SASHA OLD]

Diana, take the pan off your head please

[Diana]

And I'm on my head nothing but a collection of wigs and so not wore - it’s a pity only my beloved fiery red mud is smelling strongly now.
PS So what about recognition of Kosovo and the TRNC ?? But I can remind about the SADR ... Which Union helped with weapons. But he didn’t dare to admit (the Great Union! - not some kind of RF there ...)

[kit88]

Oh guys, and who are these 6, who voted against? Perhaps pieces 4 can be guessed with a probability of 99,99%.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: kit88

Oh guys, and who are these 6, who voted against? Perhaps pieces 4 can be guessed with a probability of 99,99%.

Despite your confidence:

116 countries voted for the document, including Russia, only six opposed (including the USA and several African states), 56 countries abstained, including France and Germany.

I see it for the first time ...

[skif8013]

Quote: ROSS 42

Quote: kit88

Oh guys, and who are these 6, who voted against? Perhaps pieces 4 can be guessed with a probability of 99,99%.

Despite your confidence:

116 countries voted for the document, including Russia, only six opposed (including the USA and several African states), 56 countries abstained, including France and Germany.

I see it for the first time ...

One of the African states is not Ukraine by chance?)))

[Ushly_bashkort]

African states look at you disapprovingly for comparison with Ukraine. Even Somalia asks not to compare them with VNA U.

[Nastia makarova]

list in the studio)))

[PalBor]

Australia, VBR, Hungary, Israel, Maldives, USA. Africa has extended its tentacles to all continents.

[Nastia makarova]

thanks for the info))) and Hungary with what a fright there?)))))

[Metallurg_2]

5 can be guessed: Poland, tribales and country 404.

[luka57]

Quote: Narcolog

"This leg - who needs a leg!" (from)

"What a disgusting mug" (c)

[knn54]

Sergei, Erysipelas (with a capital letter), all the same, the Permanent Representative ...
PS Personally, I won’t drink so much ...

[Tatyana]

Yes, the British Pierce generally has a UN attitude towards other countries at the level that "the Earth is flat"!

[PValery53]

Again, this English frau shines with a lack of intelligence.

[luka57]

I looked and wrote

[AVA77]

As an option

[luka57]

Quote: knn54

PS Personally, I won’t drink so much ...

In the morning after drinking in bed.
- How old are you?
- Women are not accepted to ask. As much as I look, there are so many ...
- Do not lie, so do not live

[Same lech]

You’re just not talking about the fifth point ... scary to even imagine.

[luka57]

Quote: Fyodor Sokolov

Now we’ll see how quickly the British return the Chagos archipelago to Mauritius.

And that fell from the floor, you can’t cut it with an ax
Still to force the Yankees to return their lands to the Indians.
Yes, they will flood the earth with blood, but they will not give

[knn54]

Fedor, they will not return. They are preparing a "regular" Boeing or similar. There is nowhere else.

[luka57]

Quote: knn54

They are preparing the next Boeing or similar

Not excluded

[Medvezhya lapa over Ki]

Visit the National Museum of Great Britain - here it is, a monument to world robbery!

[Incvizitor]

I wonder who pushed the resolution?

[Dreamboat]

We will ask Alaska from the USA. I don’t remember a free referendum there either!

[Ushly_bashkort]

They forgot about California. Part of us, part of Mexico.

[Maki Avellevich]

this one will definitely not give up

[Tarasios]

"Yesterday, only the British representative in NATO tore his hair at the fifth point, demanding that Russia return Crimea to Ukraine, and now we will see how quickly the British will return the Chagos archipelago to Mauritius."
Well Duc, Russia shows Britons what real subtle English humor is ...;)

[bessmertniy]

Here it is - the grin of British imperialism! It was necessary at the same time that the UN vote on the transfer of the Falkland Islands to Argentina, so that this territory would also be transferred to a country that has a more serious right to it than Great Britain.

[yehat]

the issue with the Falklands is rather tricky; you should not align it with the Crimea or Mauritius.
The British have quite a few formal rights to these islands.

[neri73-r]

Quote: yehat

The British have quite a few formal rights to these islands.

And in our Crimea, less?

[yehat]

about the same.
but there’s one thing - England didn’t pass the Falklands from anywhere,
but Crimea was handed over and disconnection was recognized within the borders of the Ukrainians.
those. we ourselves made the Crimea controversial,
but there is also Turkey, which can also talk about Crimea, and even Greece.

[KCA]

Turkey could when Crimea was part of independent Ukraine, but now it is in Russia and Turkey has no rights to it. All questions could start with the phrase "If Crimea does not belong to Russia", of course, approximately, in your own words

[Konstantin Shevchenko]

Turks and Greeks invaders are not considered. Is it written somewhere that the Hellenes belonged to Crimea?

[Medvezhya lapa over Ki]

In fact, the Greeks were there before the Christ era. And in Taman too. But that means nothing in today's world.
Maybe the idea should return both Americas, and the natives - Australia, the penguins - the Antarctic? Slavs - all of Europe? The Chinese - Tibet, the Ukrainians - Eden and the bottom of the Black Sea?

[Konstantin Shevchenko]

The Slavs are all who are beyond the Black Sea, the Greeks . Which Greeks did Crimea belong to?

In fact, the Greeks were there before the Christ era

Slavs, too, wherever they brought it.

[Wolf]

And who was before the Greeks?

[neri73-r]

Quote: yehat

but Crimea was handed over and disconnection was recognized within the borders of the Ukrainians.

Transferred by whom and where and was this a single country, and transferred in accordance with the Law or not? Was the collapse of the USSR legal? Voting of the majority of citizens of the USSR took into account, the vote of the Crimeans took into account? Yes, a fact is a fact, but a legally complete paragraph, so that the Malvian Islands and the situation with them rest, there is robbery in broad daylight by the Anglo-Saxons.

[luka57]

Quote: yehat

but Crimea was handed over and disconnection was recognized within the borders of the Ukrainians.

Read carefully
https://statehistory.ru/4536/Pravovoy-status-Kryma-i-Sevastopolya-s-18-go-veka-do-nashikh-dney/
One quote

In 1996, Ukraine adopted the Constitution, Art. 134 which recognizes Autonomous Republic of Crimea an integral part of Ukraine, and represents the authorities of Ukraine broad powers in the relations of Crimea.
Had the right to leave

Source: https://statehistory.ru/4536/Pravovoy-status-Kryma-i-Sevastopolya-s-18-go-veka-do-nashikh-dney/

[yehat]

I didn’t understand, but how does this affect Crimea if the entire population is against being in Ukraine?
it’s the same as Trump will hand over the state of Washington to the Russian Federation and push through a resolution in the Senate without asking anyone in the state.
the right to self-determination is higher than any assigned status.

[Dreamboat]

And also Mongolia, since the Crimean khans recognized themselves as vassals of the Golden Horde ...

[Graz]

they cannot have any rights, where is England and where are the Malvinas Islands, did you look at the map?

[yehat]

Argentina is inhabited by you know, if not Maya too.
there is a dispute of 2 robbers, whose jackpot.

[boathouse]

When the British discovered the Falkland Islands at the end of the 16th century, they were uninhabited. But Argentina did not physically exist then.

[Diana]

Who and when discovered the Falklands - reliably notit is known. But in 1820-1833. they were officially Argentinean.

[boathouse]

There, the only one who can challenge the right to pioneer is the French, and Argentina is no sideways here. By the way, the name "Malvinskie" is a French name.

[Diana]

So, we’re looking at a book from the library of my late Pope - Earth to him, rest in peace.
Elena Vladimirovna Mityaeva, "The Anglo-Argentine conflict over the Falkland Islands (Malvinas)", M., International Relations, 1985.
Page 4 lists Pathfinder candidates:
1) Amerigo Vespucci, 1502;
2) Esteban Gomez (commander of one of the ships of the Magellan expedition), 1520;
3) John Davis, 1592
Стр. 5. "In 1820, the young state (United Provinces of La Plata - modern Argentina - Approx. Mine.) Claimed the rights to the archipelago. Soon an Argentine settlement was founded there, the national flag was raised, and in 1829 a political and military command was established, headed by By Louis Vernet. "

[boathouse]

Thank you for your help But, let's look at the year of publication - 1985. Passions have not yet completely subsided after the 1982 war, where the USSR, if not openly and did not support Argentina, then sympathized with it unambiguously, and even transmitted data from its spy satellites. I remember in what way all the information was presented to us in the programs "Time" or "International Panorama". The year of publication, I will repeat it again, is 1985, therefore the respected author received the order for this book, I think, after the beginning of the conflict. Presumably she was "prompted" in what key the information should be presented. Therefore, forgive me generously, I would be careful to trust this information 100%. Sorry.

[Diana]

I reacted to what was written in this brochure regarding the current (at that time) socio-economic situation in the Falklands and the course of military operations (described there, incidentally, very superficially and in places - frankly illiterate). But I strongly doubt that the author needed to invent for some reason a version about the discovery of the islands Florentine Amerigo Vespucci. This does not affect the justification of the rights to the archipelago by either the Argentinean or the British side. Moreover, the first settlement in the Falklands was created by the French in general - and only in 1764.

[luka57]

Quote: Graz

where is england and where are the malvinas islands

where are the states and where is urcaine.
you need to scatter your dung everywhere

[Diana]

The British rights to the Falklands are based on two positions - the will of the population and the prescription of possession. The situation is similar to New Caledonia.

[Livonetc]

Cyprus formally and regularly demand that Britain stop occupying about 5% of the island’s territory occupied by their military bases.
At one time, the Britons received from the Ottoman Empire, in essence, for mercenary services in the Crimean War.

[boathouse]

Cyprus, like the Crimea, who only did not own in its entire history, starting with the Pharaohs.

[Livonetc]

Quote: varadero

Cyprus, like the Crimea, who only did not own in its entire history, starting with the Pharaohs.

A thief also owns a stolen item, but this does not cease to remain a filthy thief.
In the case of Cyprus, the thief is certainly cool and even owns nuclear weapons.
However, a thief, he is a thief.
So the petty British thieving aborigines off to their island!

[Rzzz]

Quote: Livonetc

A thief owns a stolen item too

Doesn't own. By definition: To own is to be able to lawfully use a thing in your own interests. The key word is "rightful", not a thief. Moreover, it is not necessary to own the thing that belongs to you, for example, by renting a car, you become its owner for the duration of the lease agreement, the owner gives you part of his rights, and during this time he ceases to be the owner. And another interesting point - the use of a thing "by proxy" is also not possession, because it is not "in one's own interests."
Not everyone understands this, by the way.

[Livonetc]

Quote: rzzz

Quote: Livonetc

A thief owns a stolen item too

Doesn't own. By definition: To own is to be able to lawfully use a thing in your own interests. The key word is "rightful", not a thief. Moreover, it is not necessary to own the thing that belongs to you, for example, by renting a car, you become its owner for the duration of the lease agreement, the owner gives you part of his rights, and during this time he ceases to be the owner. And another interesting point - the use of a thing "by proxy" is also not possession, because it is not "in one's own interests."
Not everyone understands this, by the way.

Kamarad referred to the time of the pharaohs.
In this case, in my definitions, I relied on Roman law, which in fact is the basis of modern law.
According to Roman law, ownership is a fact of the ability to own one or another.
It may be legal, or it may be illegal.
posessio iusta is legal possession / possession.
posessio vitiosa - unlawful possession / possession.

[luka57]

Quote: varadero

starting with the Pharaohs.

Also pharaohs claim?

[boathouse]

It is necessary to send the Black Sea Fleet squadron there, demonstrate the flag and expose the biceps!

[luka57]

Quote: varadero

Demonstrate the flag and bare your biceps!

this is not very ... citizens are called "show-off pounding"

[Thrifty]

Let Gibraltar be returned to Ishpanians! !! In addition, there is another unpleasant question for Landon - the return of frankly stolen artifacts from Egypt, India, and other countries! So, it is necessary for British Russia, like the United States, not to open its mouth to Russia, otherwise it stinks from there it hurts too much. ..

[boathouse]

Here, in St. Petersburg and in museums and on the streets of Egyptian goodness is also enough. Return?

[Kuroneko]

Quote: varadero

Here, in St. Petersburg and in museums and on the streets of Egyptian goodness is also enough. Return?

Did we steal it, robbed it, or did it worth it, paying a considerable price with both money and Russian blood?

[luka57]

Quote: varadero

We, in St. Petersburg and in museums and on the streets of Egyptian good, are also enough

Do they demand it back?

[Thrifty]

Do not juggle Varadero, otherwise I’ll make you instantly return the Gollans to Syria But seriously, study history - for example, the Angkis stole these values, we received it as a gift, or we bought it legally, legally, and from the rightful owners! So do you understand? ??

[boathouse]

Syria, let them regain the fact that she has so far taken away all trash to this day. And he will forget about the Golan once and for all.

[yehat]

Gibraltar is the little things.
if India asks to return what was taken out of there, it will be enchanting.
40 years from there actually exported the GDP of the British islands themselves.

[DMoroz]

Well, actually it's not trifles, but a strategically important rock at the entrance from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean Sea. If desired, the UK can stop all shipping, not to mention the passage of our warships ...

[luka57]

Quote: yehat

if India asks to return what was taken out of there

and China compensation for cocaine genocide?

[yehat]

objectively not cocaine

[luka57]

Quote: yehat

objectively not cocaine

Well dope. What is the difference than poisoned

[yehat]

the less untruthful the easier it is to live
even if the essence is true, the wrong wrapper makes it difficult to understand or even perverts it.

[boathouse]

You talk about "how to divide everything", but confuse cocaine with opium.

[luka57]

Quote: varadero

You talk about "how to divide everything", but confuse cocaine with opium.

I am confusing. I did not try either.
But you are apparently special in this matter

[boathouse]

Yes, I will not confuse "nonche" and "hope".

[luka57]

Quote: varadero

Yes, I will not confuse "nonche" and "hope".

Well yes. It's easier in drugs.

[boathouse]

Do you smoke, sniff or specialize in veins? Be careful, my dear, that way, God forbid, you will not only confuse "coconut" with "gerych".

[luka57]

Quote: varadero

Be careful, my dear, that way, God forbid, you will not only confuse "coconut" with "gerych".

looking at your comments, at gunpoint I will not try anything.
thank you for your use case averted even try

[boathouse]

Yes, nothing, come again, always happy to help!

[Diana]

Let Gibraltar be returned to Ishpanians!

You can’t demand this from them. Gibraltar population v. And the will of the population must be respected.

[Roman070280]

In 1966, Britain leased the largest island to the United States, deporting all residents from there. US built its air base on the island

six were opposed, including the United States.

I’m even laughing ..))

[Invoce]

Nothing to be surprised! The important thing is not the event, but how it is presented in the media (the statement of the late Bzezhinsky).
And since the overwhelming majority of the media is under the control of "Western democracy" - hence the approach to problems and the creation of public opinion up to absurd statements on historical FACTS .... No one cares that Crimea has ALWAYS been Russian. Previously, it did not belong to any state that was not (not counting the Ottoman Empire), Ukraine had the Crimea (in every sense of the word) by chance, as, incidentally, it was also born, contrary to common sense, and thanks to the Marxist-Leninist theory of the consciousness of the proletariat ...
Crimea is the goal of the Americans in whose name the Maidan was spun ...

[Wolf]

Crimea was the goal of the Anglo-Saxons yet another Krimsk war, in fact, 100 years earlier!

[Thrifty]

Then, you really need to settle the inhabitants of this archipelago in England, and, at the expense of the English budget, allocate land for eternal use from home ownership! This will be the compensation of Landon for the illegal annexation of foreign lands.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

In our market there is a woman - a copy of the UK permanent representative! He sells vegetables. Often I see her. As I saw the photo, I was stunned. :-)
Maybe this is it? .. :-)

[luka57]

Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich

In our market there is a woman - a copy of the UK permanent representative! He sells vegetables. Often I see her. As I saw the photo, I was stunned. :-)
Maybe this is it? .. :-)

The FSB did not apply?
Bdim

[Thrifty]

Andrei Nikolaevich, which of the two posts does she combine, and which of the main ones was not asked? ??

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

,, and what main did not ask ??? ,,
Honestly, I’m not quite comfortable ... Suddenly, a woman will be offended. Which woman is pleased to compare herself with some kind of ,, permanent representative of Britain ,,? ..
Yes, and with dirty greasy hair, judging by the photo ..

[Warrior-80]

How was it in Shirley "I saw this ambassador selling wooden members"

[1536]

And what else and where else has Britain rejected without "the will of the people", divided, severed ties, ruined people, etc.? Every day it is necessary to make such "recommendatory resolutions" in relation to this kingdom, just according to the number of working days per year. They live in Britain, as if in the XNUMXth century, and there - democracy is taught to everyone in the world. What kind of democracy? Bye Bye!
Note: BBC, mind you, is silent, hide information from the people of their island.

[yehat]

The British very simply acted with the will of the people - staged genocide.
therefore, now far from everyone can claim to return something.

[Kuroneko]

Requirements of former residents of the island to return them to the land in the UK ignored, saying that the expelled islanders will never receive permission to return "to British territories."

I sincerely wish Ireland to finally successfully separate from this shit under the pretentious (full) name "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".
What the British did with the Irish is even worse than the publicized Holodomor. But everyone is tolerantly silent, of course. Hypocrisy and duplicity as it is.
PS Yapy with Ainu (and even Orthodox - yes, Russia managed to convert them to our faith) cost about the same, and even more. US with Indians? And so everyone knows.

[Duck]

The United States, Hungary, Israel, Maldives, Australia, 56 countries abstained along with this terrible aunt.

[Kuroneko]

Hungary would be ashamed to have tight graters with Ukraine about the Transcarpathian compact, where many ethnic Hungarians live. = _ =

[Duck]

Why Americans with little shaves voted against it is understandable, but it would be very interesting to see the basis of such a decision by the remaining participants in this gang-watering

[Kuroneko]

With Israel, everything is also clear (the 52nd state of the United States, and in terms of importance - so is the first). Maldives? It is also clear that Porosyonko will not let him lie, resting there allegedly during the "war" with the Russian Federation (and by the way, kakbe commander in chief Ukrainian troops ... if only Stalin had such a vacation in the Second World War, ne?).
Only Australia is incomprehensible. What political dividends are you looking for from this? Tasmania is like no one has disputed and is not going to.
Well, Hungary, but it has already been said about it.

[Duck]

Howling to the owner on their part is understandable, and is not subject to dispute; but the legal, the most official side of the validity of the vote would be to see

[Kuroneko]

Not quite clear. Personally, I am at a loss, WHY Australia needed it. F-22 one FIG will not give.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Kuroneko

Only Australia is incomprehensible.

Consider that in your ranking, these are vassals of Britons and at the same time 53 US states.

[Kuroneko]

Well, all the Anglo-Saxons friend for friend, yes (plus Jews, essno). But still - it’s not at all their sphere of interests, and what they hope to get from this is also unclear. Moreover, recently Amer F-35 in a heap of publications interfered with shit. Maybe they hope to get the F-22 in this way? But this is useless.

[DMoroz]

So Australia is the same colony of small-shavens (the Queen Mother will not let me lie) ...

[Kuroneko]

Former colony, yes.
But usually Australopithecus distance itself from global problems on the other side of the globe. Why now decided to intervene - it is not clear.

[Wolf]

The country of New Zealand remained silent and South Africa?

[parusnik]

How will they return if they gave the United States? Even if they were on lease, but they never gave what they got to the USA .. This is understood by everyone, therefore the resolution has a recommendatory character ...

[Fedor Sokolov]

The demands of the former residents of the island to return their land to them in the UK are ignored, saying that the exiled islanders will never receive permission to return "to British territories"

And so it was possible! Just kick the indigenous people out of their native land! Apparently this is the famous Anglo-Saxon democracy.

[Romka47]

"" This is a question of bilateral relations, and it does not need to be brought up for international discussion. "" How to speak against someone "small", so: "We do not climb one on one so honestly" as against Mother Russia so only a crowd can. In a country way: a typical outrageous, generally without fortitude.
Well, how to speak with this England once and again, this would be Mauritius happy, and another 2/3 of the world, and the mattresses would be pressed down the fifth point.

[kit88]

It should be noted that earlier the UN International Court of Justice declared illegal the seizure of Great Britain by the archipelago.
Well, citizens are lovers of freedom of democracy, if the British do not comply with the decision of the UN International Court of Justice, then we are gathering a Coalition led by the main fighter for democracy - the United States, of course, we are driving the aircraft carrier to the archipelago. We will drive out the US military base and the British colonialists. It’s so American-style to help local proud rebels against alien invaders. So says Hollywood!
The new generation brought up on Hollywood blockbusters with popcorn in their hands just requires America to make such a decision!
That's how the Americans themselves will bury themselves someday.

And besides jokes, such a proposal should be included in the agenda of Gen. UN Assemblies.

[novel66]

Let me remind you - on one of the islands the American base is just the same! will they cast themselves out?

[Evil 55]

And what about Gibraltar .. Drive the islanders home, otherwise "grandmother's infirmities" have spread all over the world, only the life of peaceful citizens is spoiled ..

[ODERVIT]

Freedom to the people of the archipelago from the yoke of the monarchy.

[Saboteur Holuy]

The British have good expeditionary forces, no chance

[Spiridonovich2]

I cannot remember that under the great son of the Russian people, Stalin I.V., at least one country in the world claimed the lands of the USSR. It was evidently more expensive. “We don’t need someone else’s land, but we won’t give up our top too.” Either now in the days of liberal democracy. The Chinese wanted, please take the lands abundantly watered with Russian blood. Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Norway and nothing is a pity for you. Japan is next.

[Horse, people and soul]

"We don’t need someone else’s land, but we won’t give up our inch either."

It is true only when the whole earth is ours.

The Yankees so consider theirs not only the whole Earth, but also the moon, and Mars and outer space.

We, too, should consider all of this as ours in order to be able to bargain. To state that ours is all.

Florida State? Our! New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Kentucky? Our all lands. Russian!

Russian Federation of Europe, Asia, Africa, both Americas, Australia and Antarctica. Except Kosovo. Kosovo - Railway Serbia!

[Alex013]

They will not give. A strategic facility that allows you to control the entire Indian Ocean.

[Horse, people and soul]

Chetarzhu ...

The United Kingdom will "impose" on this vote of the UN, just as Russia will "impose" on any vote on Crimea.

What will "impose"? The veto, of course, if it is discussed in the UN Security Council. And if not in the Council, then he will simply "impose" and that's it ...

[APASUS]

Western Democracy - it is!

[sharp-lad]

Wow "fluff" on the Anglo-Saxon snout!

[Durman_54]

Beautiful double standards in the comments. Come on, Britain will not give up the islands, just as Russia will not give up the Crimea. Both that, and another are wrung out with violation of international rights, as there is only one real thing - the law of force. Well, national pride will not. The rest - so, self-hypnosis to calm.