Failure of the matrix. Reflections of Nikita Mikhalkov

139
Nikita Mikhalkov reflects on sore. Speech in the plot of the next release of his "Besogon" has come about what is the "price of money" for individual citizens. This is about those who allow themselves to keep foreign currency not even in millions, but in centners - in garages and in warehouses - in cash. For such people, the expense of money is not important, the factor of their accumulation is important. Fabulous sums of some against the backdrop of when millions of others remain below the poverty line.

Failure of the matrix. Reflections of Nikita Mikhalkov




Nikita Mikhalkov says that in this case it’s not even the scale of corruption, but the deeper one:

Where did this matrix crash happen?


The director cites episodes of modern broadcasts on federal channels, where swearing, obscene language, and discussion of “dirty laundry” has become the norm. According to Mikhalkov, we have a desire to savor not only the pain of others, other people's problems, but also someone else’s dishonesty.

We savor the endless scandals, betrayals, lies and filth

- says Mikhalkov.

He notes that all this falls out on the Russians daily.

This problem has been repeatedly raised in many projects, including materials on “VO”.

At this time, Mikhalkov, literally bit by bit, examines everything that flows from the screens. At the same time, the film director notes that he does not call for a ban on such content, but catches himself thinking that such programs make him distract and focus attention on themselves. Distract from much more important, pressing things. All the base qualities of man today for many are put above all that is usually called humanity.

139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    April 28 2019 15: 58
    Oh, about morality, the conversation went, is it with a liberal financial model?
    1. +29
      April 28 2019 16: 04
      Quote: Tank jacket
      Oh, about morality, the conversation went, is it with a liberal financial model?

      So Mikhalkov himself was the ancestor of all this. What, wiser or what? Or earlier, in the 90s. did not think to what consequences his "creativity" will lead?
      1. +11
        April 28 2019 16: 15
        hi welcome! There are either underpants or a cross ...
      2. +3
        April 28 2019 16: 51
        Flies versus "honey"?
      3. +27
        April 28 2019 17: 00
        The Mikhalkovs felt wonderful at different orders. Beginning even with tsarism. Praising the existing power and keeping your nose in the wind ... I feel like the changes are coming .. Once Mikhalkov began to criticize ..
        1. 0
          April 29 2019 12: 16
          Quote: 210ox

          The Mikhalkovs felt wonderful with different orders.

          Then the Surikovs ...
        2. +9
          April 29 2019 15: 13
          210 okv, I totally agree with you. Even under the communists, even under the "developed" socialists, even under the oligarchy - this family is always at the royal court, trying to be useful to the throne in a hypostasis suitable for him and herself ... I remember watching the film "I walk around Moscow", where Mikhalkov played one of the main roles, felt even not to the hero - to Mikhalkov himself an unpleasant feeling: major! Well, a guy from an ordinary Soviet family could not hold on like that. There was in him something of a barchuk, spoiled by impunity, not burdened with worries, but who knew very well what he needed from life, and was absolutely sure that he would receive his own - that is, that set of human qualities that cannot be hidden, they will manifest themselves in gestures , facial expressions, expression of eyes, manner of speaking and holding oneself ... And finally she took a dislike to him after the film "Dowry". The plot seemed to develop normally, but at the end this inexpressibly vulgar gesture, a quick wink at the accomplice, a nod of the head - they say, we take the heroine with us to Paris as a courtesan ... You know, it is impossible to play such a level of vulgarity, so that it manifests itself only on brief moment, highlighting the nature of not a hero, but an actor. To do this, the actor himself needs to be vulgar. At the same time, I do not impose an image on a person. I see the manifestation of a person in an image ...
          But then I had no idea who Nikita Mikhalkov was. And only after having watched several programs of "Besogon" a couple of years ago, having taken an interest, I finally learned from the Internet who teaches me morality. It turned out to be His Majesty's Bedner! Hereditary Knight of the Order of the Garter!
          Well, everyone has their own roles. Serebryannikov teaches not to love Russia (I saw his performances on "Culture"), Mikhalkov, with his whole life - to love power as Russia and to revere it.
        3. 0
          April 30 2019 10: 57
          Mikhalkovs felt great with different orders

          What did you attack him? ... He actually protects our values! ... Who was he under Yeltsin? Is there a difference?
          If a person's worldview changes under the influence of changing external circumstances - this is normal!
          In the 90s, I also believed in the bright ideals of democracy. And he voted for Yeltsin. Disappointed. Wrong ... So what? Is this "changing shoes in the air"? - how to express it here now ... This is called rethinking !!!
          And I am very sorry that not everyone has been given it - let's peck! request
      4. +6
        April 28 2019 18: 09
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        What, wiser or what?

        Most likely, as usual, I felt the direction of the blow ...
      5. +6
        April 28 2019 19: 40
        No, it's just that some media subjects occasionally go to Wikipedia to refresh their memory of the word "conscience". We must pay tribute to Nikita Sergeevich, he visits regularly, about once every six months (for the media, this is a record). Apparently he feels an imminent meeting with the Peter the Great ...
        PS. And could become a good marines ...
      6. +17
        April 28 2019 20: 13
        Mikhalkov analyzes everything that is pouring from the screens. The man who filmed the scene where the German pilot shows a naked aphedron from the cockpit complains about the quality of "modern broadcasts on federal channels, where swearing, obscenity, discussion of" dirty laundry "has become the norm." Does he have any desire to discuss the moral character of the director who directed Burnt by the Sun?
        1. +3
          April 29 2019 01: 00
          In one of their interviews, the Maestro complained that these films were slightly ahead of time, and therefore the viewer is still not able to appreciate the depth of the director's view and the conceptual freshness in revealing the topic.
        2. +2
          April 29 2019 10: 25
          Burnt by the sun Chernukha? Are you laughing? Do you compare with Malakhov?
      7. 0
        April 28 2019 21: 19
        The "blue thief" is immediately remembered.
      8. +5
        April 29 2019 10: 23
        What did you mean? Something I do not recall the chernukha at Mikhalkov.
      9. +3
        April 29 2019 12: 15
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        So Mikhalkov himself was the ancestor of all this. What, wiser or what? Or earlier, in the 90s. did not think to what consequences his "creativity" will lead?

        Dexterously changing his shoes and what has to do with it not for the first time ... As he himself says about his kind: "The Volga flows in any regime" ...
        Why does he have so many phones in the background? Direct line with the President, direct line with the Patriarch and direct line with ... belay
      10. 0
        April 30 2019 10: 54
        It’s in vain that you run into Mikhalkov. Rummage through its history and the Internet and you will not find anything from what you accuse him of. If from the reaction to the communist past of the country, then it is possible. And yet, about the liberal financial model. And what could it be even under our own constitution, which was completely written off from the American? Mikhalkov is right that streams of dirt, obscenities and obscenities are pouring from our TV, indulging in the principles of impurity in discussing other people's underwear, the liberals are turning their entire seamy side so as not only to discredit not only the past of the country, but also our future.
    2. +13
      April 28 2019 16: 06
      What kind of morality can we talk about if in our state help goes only to moneybags, and no one thinks about the people. The people serve only to rip it off, like sticky. And each time more and more.
      1. +34
        April 28 2019 16: 13
        "Barin" likes to speculate on the themes of "morality", the Russian home, "the Russian way", etc. sitting in a "khatenka" worth about a million dollars, surrounded by works of art, antiques worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. smile
        1. +21
          April 28 2019 16: 23
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          "Barin" likes to speculate on the themes of "morality", the Russian home, "the Russian way", etc. sitting in a "khatenka" worth about a million dollars, surrounded by works of art, antiques worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. smile

          Mikhalkov, at least in his life produced something as a "product" and inherited something, unlike the nouveau riche who made their capital solely on privatization and acquisitiveness ...
          1. +13
            April 28 2019 16: 46
            Quote: Separ DNR
            Mikhalkov, at least something in his life produced as a "product" and inherited something

            -----------------------------
            And he didn't try to get royalties for "copyright" from discs and cassettes?
            1. +1
              April 28 2019 16: 53
              Quote: Altona
              And he didn't try to get royalties for "copyright" from discs and cassettes?

              I understand that not from disks and tapes Depeche Mode ? And the product on which are issued his copyrights?
              I, in fact, admit that I am very frivolous with copyright, but since certain laws are in force in the state regarding them, then if they "grab" me, then there is nowhere to go request It’s necessary to fork out if there is enough money wassat
              Nothing supernatural ...
        2. +12
          April 28 2019 16: 31
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          "Barin" likes to speculate on "morality"

          -----------------------------
          Barin is trying to pull the public consciousness characteristic of the Soviet social model onto the capitalist model. And he is sincerely surprised at the social vices that have arisen. The late Stanislav Govorukhin called himself and the artists at one creative meeting "girls with low social responsibility." He named himself for filming the false liberal propaganda campaign "Russia We Lost" in the 1990s. Well, at least he realized what happened, but the master is still in the process.
          1. -1
            April 29 2019 02: 57
            At the time of the Union, Barin probably had a bright image of capitalism. Probably like Govorukhin. But reality turned out to be far from their ideas. Although as a cultural figure, Mikhalkov certainly represents what the plots of modern life will lead to. But when did it open to him? What influenced this discovery? As a representative of the elite, Mikhalkov during the Union revolved among them, knew their dreams and supported them. But what went wrong that Mikhalkov began to see clearly? Or did he realize the worthlessness of the modern elite and decided to seek the support of the people? He understood what the current elite is headed for?
        3. +2
          April 28 2019 17: 41
          An old noble family .... What did you want? It’s their background, they won’t be able to do without it .. Slime pancakes.
        4. -1
          April 28 2019 19: 51
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          "Barin" likes to speculate

          Behind BARIN are generations of glorious ancestors. The experience and property accumulated by generations. Mikhalkov himself earns enough money for works of art and the things around him .. He is famous and rich in spirituality and morality. Unlike "suddenly" rich plebs, poor in soul and deeds of thieves!
          1. +2
            April 28 2019 20: 15
            Quote: 30 vis
            Mikhalkov himself earns enough for works of art

            Especially as a director.

            The last line is staggering. Did he have a movie by magic, and collected fees for 63 million? In general, for example, in the middle of the 90's I didn’t hear about the Fatigued.
            1. +3
              April 29 2019 03: 03
              Judging by the table, his films do not beat off costs !? Maybe this is his moralizing !? You need to live on something. So it is transmitting. Or maybe they don’t give him money to shoot.
              1. 0
                April 29 2019 09: 58
                Quote: Mister Creed
                Judging by the table, his films do not beat off costs!

                The Siberian barber is 35 million. And I remember very well how completely different numbers were voiced in 90. Higher. Far beyond 40 million. And Mikhalkov’s sponsors are government agencies, such as VTB.
            2. 0
              April 29 2019 10: 05
              I, the quote-book of MaoZedong, did not watch and do not watch the soap operas and did not hear, and did not read the materials of the 25th Congress of the CPSU Central Committee ...... So what? ! They are not here !!
              1. 0
                April 29 2019 10: 13
                Quote: 30 vis
                I, the quote-book of MaoZedong, did not watch and do not watch the soap operas and did not hear and did not read the materials of 25 of the Congress of the CPSU Central Committee ...... And so? ! They are not !!

                I want to say that this last line is more like money laundering. So as not to ask why this gentleman is eating us. The numbers change over time like that. The budget of failed films by Mikhalkov (and over the past 20 years - they are all failed) in the media is decreasing for some reason.
        5. 0
          April 29 2019 01: 58
          Can an emigrant condemn him?
        6. +2
          April 29 2019 05: 19
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          "Barin" likes to speculate on the themes of "morality", the Russian home, "the Russian way", etc. sitting in a "khatenka" worth about a million dollars, surrounded by works of art, antiques worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. smile

          +100500
          and skimming the copyright content (note not yours)
          I remember that about 25 years ago I was traveling from St. Petersburg to Moscow on Strela, so this champion of morality in the next compartment spent the whole night of two young ladies teaching about morality and art.
        7. +1
          April 29 2019 10: 27
          Are you jealous? Mikhalkov is a talented actor and director! Unlike many television nouveau riche.
      2. +15
        April 28 2019 16: 58
        Ivan Efremov: writer, scientist, Man.
        All the destruction of empires, states and other political organizations occurs through the loss of morality. (1969)
        Generations accustomed to an honest lifestyle should die out over the next 20 years, and then the greatest catastrophe in history will occur in the form of a widely spread technical monoculture, the foundations of which are now being steadily introduced in all countries, and even in China, Indonesia and Africa. (1971 g.)
        1. +7
          April 28 2019 17: 01
          no friends, this is the case when the "besogon" himself needs a "besogon" ... or an exorcist rather.
          1. -14
            April 28 2019 17: 25
            Listen less to Goblin and Co.
            Suddenly it turns out that the world is not black and white.
            1. +6
              April 28 2019 17: 46
              Quote: Mestny
              Listen less to Goblin and Co.
              Suddenly it turns out that the world is not black and white.

              and "rainbow"? belay
              1. -10
                April 28 2019 18: 25
                I see ...
                I’ll say for sure - not black, not red and not white.
                Especially not red.
                So affordable?
                1. +3
                  April 29 2019 02: 02
                  And why are you so nervous about red? Or do you have capital acquired "honestly"? Therefore, such a fear of the red ... Yes, the "honest businessman" was not allowed to pamper there
                2. +1
                  April 29 2019 03: 05
                  Interesting! What color is the world? What color is capitalism? What color is Europe and the USA? From red it hurts the eyes, black does not like. And what pleases the eye?
                3. 0
                  April 30 2019 13: 38
                  The world consists of a gradation of gray. This has long been known. Mikhalkov did not like either under the USSR or now. Although man is undoubtedly not without talent. A courtier, a sham, finding themes for a response, rather a businessman ........ creative.
          2. +2
            April 29 2019 08: 45
            Quote: Aerodrome
            , most need "besogon".

            Did he pass the flasher? Ministry of Defense .... Interesting.
    3. +6
      April 28 2019 17: 52
      Those who are cleverly trying to read us morality, should more often look in the mirror:
      ... Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov deprived the chairman of the Public Council of his department of a flashing light, because the ministry cut the quotas for special signals, - told the Life News details of the scandal at the Ministry of Defense. - Mikhalkov in this new quota, it was decided not to include. The director, having learned about it, put an ultimatum to the military: either they leave a flasher, or he leaves the Council. The military department didn’t even think about it - Nikita Sergeevich was taken out of the Public Council of the Ministry of Defense ... in a scandalous interview with Life News, Mikhalkov declared in obscene form that he wasn’t going to part with his flashing light voluntarily, and said that he had permission to flash a blinker until the end of the year as chairman of the Public Council ...

      Из новости 2011 года: https://life.ru/t/%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/58972
    4. +3
      April 28 2019 19: 41
      Quote: Tank jacket
      Oh, about morality, the conversation went, is it with a liberal financial model?

      Morality is needed with any model and at any time!
      1. -4
        April 29 2019 03: 09
        Oh well! Only morality is different in different models. You can type in the search "Human Meat Shop". You can type "Made by them". Are these all signs of civilization and morality?
  2. +16
    April 28 2019 16: 06
    For such people, the money bill is not important, the factor of their accumulation is important.
    .
    When will you get drunk, moneymakers? Do not forget to make pockets on your coffin.
    No wonder they say that if a person has a conscience, then for sure there is no money.
    1. +1
      April 28 2019 21: 03
      Quote: Terenin
      No wonder they say that if a person has a conscience, then for sure there is no money.

      Something like this, but not always true. There are those who do not give as much as they want, anyway they will lower them to zero without a twinge of conscience, and there are those to whom even a little bit is enough to keep oneself from falling and to help one's neighbor to rise. Everything is conditional. The main thing to understand why?
    2. -1
      April 29 2019 03: 12
      They will answer that. So I'm not trying for myself! I am for my family, for my children! So that my children and grandchildren live in poverty! Well, how is that argument? Convinced? Or angry? And the man kind of said normal things. About family, children, grandchildren.
    3. +2
      April 30 2019 08: 36
      "... He who is without fear and reproach is always not with the money ..." (V. Vysotsky)
  3. +18
    April 28 2019 16: 12
    Does Mikhalkov expel demons from himself? smile Ranting the liberal gentleman ... after flogging the peasants at the stable ...
    1. -13
      April 28 2019 17: 27
      If from yourself - so God forbid everyone.
      Are you out of yourself - are you capable?
      1. +13
        April 28 2019 17: 45
        And what am I to expel from myself? I do not steal, and I do not rob, in due time the oath remained faithful, did not swear an oath ...
        1. -3
          April 28 2019 21: 08
          Quote: parusnik
          And what am I to expel from myself? I do not steal, and I do not rob, in due time the oath remained faithful, did not swear an oath ...

          You are a sinner Aleksey Bogomazov, although judging by the surname of your ancestors in church workshops, the faces on the icons wrote "Anointed God." This is called pride. Jesus said to be the first to throw a stone at me who is without sin. And are they, without sin then?
          1. +2
            April 28 2019 21: 31
            "And when they continued to ask Him, He lifted himself up and said to them: He who is without sin among you, first throw a stone at her." To be precise ... laughing
            1. +1
              April 28 2019 22: 03
              Quote: parusnik
              .... To be precise ... laughing

              Only a very rich person like N.M. can teach important and rigorous. WHO --- be victorious ---- should he listen, bow and nod ???? request
              1. -1
                April 28 2019 22: 09
                ... Honestly, I do not like to retell my comments, what I had in mind .. It's like telling a joke, and immediately explain what the salt is ... where's the joke-humor ...
                1. +1
                  April 28 2019 22: 15
                  Quote: parusnik
                  ... Honestly, I do not like to retell my comments, what I had in mind .. It's like telling a joke, and immediately explain what the salt is ... where's the joke-humor ...
                  For me, it happened in relation to the past. .... and ----- thanks for that.! Since it happens, some past events cannot be understood at all. Like no schoolboy answered --- who is the "policeman"? It happened that you "sent me" to Raikin.
          2. 0
            April 30 2019 05: 36
            ... Jesus Christos - Prince Andrey Bogolyubsky lacks blood on him ..
      2. +2
        April 28 2019 18: 15
        Quote: Mestny
        If from yourself - so God forbid everyone.
        Are you out of yourself - are you capable?

        In, manifested ... everything was able and ... rosy! lol
        1. -8
          April 28 2019 18: 27
          Are there two of you there?
          Well, here ... talk.
          1. +2
            April 28 2019 18: 45
            Quote: Mestny
            Are there two of you there?

            Millions of you, us of darkness and darkness and darkness ... etc.
            1. -9
              April 28 2019 19: 35
              Ah, got it.
              So far, in terms of the number of minuses, you are specifically 2, plus 2 more of some kind of patients for the whole liver.
              Colleagues by the glass?
              All the best to you, comrades.
              1. +3
                April 29 2019 07: 11
                Quote: Mestny
                Colleagues by the glass?

                And you, Mestny, goodbye! Someone hurts! (It's about the liver, so you understand) lol You would have married, or something, unsuccessfully: it would be possible to tear evil from your wife and mother-in-law! What are they splashing here in public ...hi Why are you visiting the site? Fight against communism ?! lol So you are doing poorly - they are not capable of spitting on anyone more than they can call! So everything is clumsy, that all the time there is a suspicion about .... a person is trying to work out! request
      3. +9
        April 28 2019 19: 17
        I will intercede for parusnik. He correctly noticed everything. And to translate arrows on the interlocutor, when there is nothing to say on the merits of the case, such as what you yourself are a sure sign of an angry demagogue. However, in VO is not one such mestny.
    2. +1
      April 28 2019 21: 06
      Quote: parusnik
      Does Mikhalkov expel demons from himself? smile Ranting the liberal gentleman ... after flogging the peasants at the stable ...

      It sounds normal, but it seems that no one listened to him, and probably didn’t hear of those of whom he was talking about. At the same time, the trivial talk shows continue. And the people to teach in a sympathetic tone ---- ambiguity after everything that happens around.
  4. +4
    April 28 2019 16: 21
    Mikhalkov, just like his father is a good fittest, he will be comfortable with any power, he has no principles, no faith, nothing, only selfish interest
    1. +6
      April 28 2019 19: 29
      I disagree. The Mikhalkovs have everything materially, but there is a family desire to spin close to the powerful and a sharpened sense of smell developed by generations for the exquisite satisfaction of the hidden desires of the leadership. Father his three times rewrote the words of the anthem in the range ... "Stalin raised us to be loyal to the people" ... (Registan, Mikhalkov), through ... "Lenin's party is the power of the people" to ... "God-protected native land." It had to be contrived.
      1. -1
        April 29 2019 03: 17
        I don’t quite (or rather don’t understand at all) understand the hidden desires of the leadership! Apparently I have no scent at all!
        1. +3
          April 29 2019 05: 25
          Because you don’t understand - you write in VO, and Mikhalkov wrote the words three times to the same anthem. Just like in a joke. Remember - from pro Mikoyan ...
      2. +2
        April 29 2019 05: 21
        Quote: mikh-korsakov
        Father his three times rewrote the words of the anthem in the range ... "Stalin raised us to be loyal to the people" ... (Registan, Mikhalkov), through ... "Lenin's party is the power of the people" to ... "God-protected native land." It had to be contrived.

        you can’t crush genes with your finger.
        laughing
  5. +17
    April 28 2019 16: 21
    Is it possible to evaluate how adequate the acquisition of several yachts or aircraft (the ass is still one) ... moreover, yachts of this size. What not all ports accept? Is it possible to consider a healthy person who stuffs rooms with money? I think that a Russian oligarch or a bribe-taking official is still a diagnosis .... Channels are only a reflection of this position .. Lack of ideology of the state ... creates spirituality and corruption of society ... and only leads to degradation ...
    1. +1
      April 29 2019 03: 20
      Perhaps this can be regarded as a disease. A person does not have a sense of reasonable sufficiency, saturation, and brakes. This is like alcoholism. It is not necessary, but I really want to!
      1. +2
        April 29 2019 07: 05
        It’s just that these animals don’t understand what happiness is .... For me, happiness is walking your favorite dog, messing with your granddaughter, going fishing and mushrooms with friends ... in a bathhouse and barbecue ... and know that no one knocks on the door and they won’t sneak a million of smelly bucks from me ... They believe that I am promoting the miserable position of a loser ... but the fact is that I don’t need this smut ... at a mountain resort Sheregesh and Courchevel ... it’s not near .. that rafting down a mountain river I crack such tasty things that they haven’t heard about ... but are measured by the number of smelly grandmas and a long pussy .. sorry .. they are not the same age .. I feel sorry for them ... they lived their life they weren’t aware that my ass absolutely doesn’t care what toilet she is doing ... I feel sorry for them ...
  6. 0
    April 28 2019 16: 21
    Well, individuals are just collectors. Someone brand and they are money. And there were many such before. It's a disease. And about the fact that it pours from the screens, well, funny to her God. Watch culture channel or SPAS. Delov then press the button. Content is not taken from the air. Show what people want to see. They will not find in the broadcast network the Internet is in a hurry to help. We are covered by a century of open information. And eat a full spoon. But since not so long ago everyone was outraged by the new law on the Internet, everyone is happy with everything. And then why be surprised?)))
    1. +2
      April 29 2019 07: 24
      They want to see ... are you sure? What kind of people? ... those who are looking at the box and seeing a child dying of illness buy another yacht .. stealing money from his parents? Paying for the channels, they impose their position on society ... leading to degradation and decay .. Let the homosexual also be promoted ... People will watch it too ...
      1. +1
        April 29 2019 11: 22
        Do not look. It's that simple. This is your choice.
        1. +1
          3 May 2019 08: 02
          My? Suddenly ... a stoned major chases grandmothers on footpaths .. I get this news on all channels 15 times a day .. or a fight of socialites .. here's the news for a great country .. moreover, 20 channels have subsidies from the budget .. I have to also pay for this abomination .. again Malakhov ..
          1. -2
            3 May 2019 11: 00
            Turn on the channel culture and business) or buy a normal prefix and look at all what your soul wants. The choice is enormous. From children's channels with cartoons to channels where TV shows are available XNUMX hours a day)
  7. +15
    April 28 2019 16: 24
    Nikita Sergeevich first pokes Stalin into the cake with his face, and then talks about "a failure in the matrix". So all the same according to your beloved Stolypin, Nikita Sergeevich. They created "strong owners" from the peasants and immediately plunged into the bourgeois consciousness. Well, so that all around "expensive, bahato", that is, to look bigger than you really are and to press around the more refined and complex spheres of life. This is the age-old social mechanism in which money plays a major role. Well, the "people of art" will serve and justify all this vileness, daily and hourly.
    1. +7
      April 28 2019 18: 05
      Well, Comrade Stalin, he should not have fouled. If not for him, Mikhalkov's dad would have been a supernumerary hack. This is exactly the option when "thanks to Comrade Stalin for a happy childhood"
      1. +5
        April 28 2019 18: 17
        Quote: AS Ivanov.
        Well, he shouldn’t have fooled Comrade Stalin.

        Well, you give ... But what about the direction of the wind? laughing
        1. -1
          April 28 2019 19: 07
          Sometimes it's better to be silent than to speak.
  8. 0
    April 28 2019 16: 27
    Quote: Bull Terrier
    about since not so long ago everyone was outraged by the new law on the Internet, everyone is happy with everything. And then why be surprised?)))


    Actually it is not so))) "All" is only a part and rather small.
    1. -1
      April 28 2019 17: 06
      Well, well))) there are those who understand why he is 10 percent) the rest are yelling about stranglers of freedom)
  9. 0
    April 28 2019 16: 39
    According to Mikhalkov, we had a desire to savor not only someone else's pain, someone else's problems, but also someone else's dishonesty.
    He himself is a lover of savory, everything and everything. I would go to study, (before it’s too late) to make a good movie.
    1. +7
      April 28 2019 16: 44
      Quote: sagitch
      I would go to study, (before it’s too late) to make a good movie.

      He has long forgotten how.
  10. +19
    April 28 2019 16: 44
    Where did this matrix crash happen?


    the failure of the matrix occurred in the 90s when the authorities said "The survival of the people is no longer a matter of the state but a private matter of the people. Who survives will survive and who will die, we will not cry much" and this continues to this day. Therefore, some have bags of money warehouses, garages, and others live below the poverty line. Still others, having received psychological trauma in the 90s, clog their apartments with garbage from garbage dumps.
    Every citizen of Russia from the billionaire to the last beggar knows and understands that he can only rely on himself
    and the state is not something that will not help in trouble, but on the contrary will throw it into the street if it weakens and cannot pay taxes.
    Remember the syndrome of residents of the besieged Leningrad when the survivors of the siege, already in the old days when there were no problems with the products, they didn’t eat all that they were given completely, but hid it under a mattress for a rainy day.

    And judging by the laws in Russia, the government more and more withdraws from itself at least some kind of social guarantees, even if they decided to transfer the cemeteries to private hands, then there was not a failure, but the destruction of the matrix along with the descent of the USSR flag.
    1. +3
      April 28 2019 18: 47
      Quote: lopvlad
      destruction of the matrix along with the descent of the flag of the USSR.

      one + I can only deliver, alas ... hi
    2. +2
      April 29 2019 17: 31
      The failure happened much earlier. Since the XX Congress. When people were told that what they believed was wrong. When they said that the private is more important than the public. Then people began to care about their own wealth more than about the welfare of the state, which means about the common welfare. This is very well shown in the movie A Noisy Day. Now it is often remembered that Stalin raised the country in a few years, and now, in the same time, there is no visible progress. Has anyone wondered if people will go to work for an idea now? And what should be this idea so that people are ready to endure inconvenience for it, but strive to achieve the goal?
  11. +4
    April 28 2019 16: 45
    People who have become rich, having "gorged on", if all is not yet lost, sometimes think about morality. Before that, they were not interested in such trifles. Then when the time comes to think about the eternal and about heirs, unwittingly morality becomes important. And before we thought about how to achieve apple trees blooming on Mars. Knowledge and humanity were valued.
    1. +2
      April 28 2019 18: 15
      Quote: Ali Kokand
      "having eaten", if all is not yet lost, sometimes they think about morality.


      you can think about morality if at least a part of this morality has been preserved from the one that the parents instilled in childhood. And if no one has laid this morality, then there will be nothing to think about.
  12. 9PA
    +7
    April 28 2019 16: 52
    As subtly noticed Zelensky people of Russia, the second oil for power)
    1. +5
      April 28 2019 18: 18
      Quote: 9PA
      the people of Russia are the second oil for power)


      the main thing is that not cannon fodder for the war is on the side of the West. Any people are a source of income for the country's authorities, even if your country is the United States and you are the American people.
  13. +9
    April 28 2019 16: 57
    But he didn’t throw Lenin out of the Mausoleum. And how much he talked about this ...
    And somehow strangely silent about Stalin.
    "We savor endless scandals, betrayals, lies and abomination," says Mikhalkov.
    Well yes. Someone relishes one and gets pennies, while someone relishes which Stalin and Lenin were monsters. And most importantly - before, they were communists, Komsomol members ... like the current Bandera in Ukraine.
    And who there demolished monuments to Dzerzhinsky, Lenin, Marx? Betrayal, lies and abomination?
    Well, from the creator of the anthem of Russia and the pope:

    Sergey Mikhalkov
    In the Museum of V.I. Lenin

    On sunday with my sister
    We left the yard.
    - I will lead you to the museum! -
    Sister told me.

    Here we go through the square
    And finally we enter
    In a big, beautiful red house,
    It looks like a palace.

    Moving from room to room,
    People are moving here.
    The whole life of a great leader
    It rises before me.

    I see the house where Lenin grew up
    And that creditable sheet
    What from the gymnasium brought
    Ulyanov-gymnasium student.

    Here the books are lined up in a row -
    He read them as a child,
    Above them many years ago
    He thought and dreamed.

    From childhood he dreamed that
    So that in their native land
    Man lived by his labor
    And was not in bondage ...

    Such a besogon!
  14. +13
    April 28 2019 17: 06
    I recognize a nickname .... Everyone is to blame and he is in white purple .. Because you and a louse pubic put his dirty paw to the collapse of what your parents built ...
    1. +13
      April 28 2019 17: 31
      The fact that he is a shifter, like all of our supposedly intelligentsia, it is enough to see his interview in the 90s, where he praises Borya Yeltsin, that Borya the drunk saved Russia from disaster. P si. It’s good that there is an Internet, everything that was said earlier can be freshened up in the memory of those who forgot.
  15. +4
    April 28 2019 17: 07
    Now, to indicate that the country is being planted, the principles are being affirmed - Divide and conquer, Bread and circuses, Do not steal, for a little while, or they will sway, Man is an official, enemies forever .... and so on, such things are possible. Especially when you have everything in chocolate and power caressed, because against her, you will never trample !!!
    In short, it says, to some extent, rightly, beautifully ... it just looks like LICENSE!
    After all, there is a simple rule that is always clear to everyone - START WITH YOURSELF!
    You can then all that you have done the necessary, useful, everywhere to cover, but at least shoot films about that !!!
    ONLY START DOING THE BUSINESS!
  16. +8
    April 28 2019 17: 16
    "Where did this matrix failure occur?"

    It is strange if a bison like Mikhalkov dwells on this question and does not give an answer to it, expressing concern. Has the matrix failed to pass through that layer in the people to which the asking question belongs - through the intelligentsia? Did NSM ask itself the question - what is the source of morality? What is the role of the intelligentsia in different periods over the past hundred years? Why the intelligentsia despised K.N. Leontiev, calling her to rapprochement with the people? Intellectually, the judgments of, for example, Andron M., K. Shakhnazarov are much more interesting.
    1. +1
      April 28 2019 18: 49
      Quote: Alexander Ra
      It’s strange if a bison like Mikhalkov

      headquarters? the bull is old, not the bison ...
    2. +4
      April 28 2019 22: 13
      Quote: Alexander Ra
      "Where did this matrix failure occur?"

      Today's TV distracts the public from real problems, it is better to let the people endure their negativity on "Shurygina" and Ukraine than on the Russian government, by the way, in the 90s soap operas distracted people from problems.
  17. +3
    April 28 2019 17: 25
    Failure of the matrix. Reflections of Nikita Mikhalkov

    Well, this is all described in the classic - the reason is the worship of the golden calf (Mammon).
  18. 3vs
    +6
    April 28 2019 17: 28
    All right, says Comrade Mikhalkov.
    And about the garage, stuffed with cash, and not to forward this question to the gentlemen
    Nabiullina, Gref, Sechin, Medvedev, Siluanov, Putin, etc. ...?
    Why should ordinary people raise money for operations for children ?!
    What, the state has nothing to do with us?
    Comrade Mikhalkov, to hell with them, with the market, ask this question to those in power!
    1. +3
      April 28 2019 18: 51
      Quote: 3vs
      All right, says Comrade Mikhalkov.

      "Comrade" master flashing lights, correctly fluger.
    2. -1
      April 29 2019 03: 27
      Pochinok also answered this question on one TV program during his lifetime. Leadership must not be a beggar!
  19. +1
    April 28 2019 17: 39
    And who or what makes people watch TV an abomination? Do not like, do not look. On the Internet there are a huge number of books and just interesting information.
  20. +2
    April 28 2019 18: 03
    Our TV (main channels) is led by the enemies of the people and the country with the goal of completely destroying the morality of people.
    1. +5
      April 28 2019 18: 52
      Quote: kriten
      Our TV (main channels) is led by the enemies of the people and the country with the goal of completely destroying the morality of people.

      let's face it, these are federal channels. bad conclusions, right?
      1. +3
        April 29 2019 03: 35
        Federal channels, this is the policy of the country's leadership. And all the talk about independent media is just talk. This is clearly seen in foreign funds. It seems independent, but at the hour X begin to blow in one tune. Type Russia is a threat to peace, Russia is an aggressor and so on. Therefore, all TV programs are in the interests of our leadership. Today there are channels telling about the achievements of the USSR? Che sort of show. But there were certainly repressions and executions! Without this, then they say nothing!
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. +3
    April 28 2019 19: 27
    Here Piotrovsky wears a black scarf, actor Boyarsky - burgundy, and Mikhalkov "put on" in a warm room some kind of colorful scarf. Are these different Masonic lodges? Or different "degrees"?
    1. 0
      April 29 2019 03: 39
      This is an attribute of the elite. Do not quibble. That's when the president and ministers start wearing scarves, then yes! Then there will be a color identification of pants! Kinza-za will come into reality!
      1. 0
        April 29 2019 05: 50
        Quote: Mister Creed
        Then there will be a color identification of pants!

  23. +8
    April 28 2019 19: 43
    Mikhalkov is not credible. Especially after the release of his program in honor of the Great Patriotic War, where he read out the alleged "diary of a Jewish girl", which was allegedly transported to the rear with other refugees. The text was read out hysterically and accompanied by "heartbreaking" music - a typical technique of rapport hypnosis. Nevertheless, I noticed that this is a stream of selective incoherent delirium, as if it were a retelling of a dream of a schizophrenic, anti-Soviet and Russophobia. As Peskov remarked "why exactly shoes", I ask Nikita Sergeevich - why exactly Jewish and why a stream of delirium? Is your shirt closer to your body? The people are all fools - and will not notice the delirium? Since then, Nikita has been a strong rejection in me. I do not like lies and hypocrisy. I don't like wolves in sheep's clothing
  24. +3
    April 28 2019 19: 47
    Yes, let the dupu stick out of the cab, and shit on it all. Not the first of April, right? What is this pure nonsense? Mikhalkov says that someone is stealing? And in the cauldron, for the movie that he shot, will he speak the same way? He also has a lot of good works, but what he leaked to the "barge" will burn for eternity. But he talks about his homeland ... Another trash patriot ...
    1. +1
      April 28 2019 19: 52
      In general, I said everything wrong. This is a very simple thing. Like a prostitute on the highway. Yesterday it was fashionable "behind", each underwear picked up and came up with a pose more vigorously. Today it is fashionable on the knees - lips with a bow, lipstick is brighter. That's all. There is no glitch here.
  25. -2
    April 28 2019 20: 24
    Very correct questions were raised by Mikhalkov. Topical. But the commentators are astounding. Not a word in essence. They set about discussing Mikhalkov himself.
    1. +5
      April 28 2019 20: 47
      And how can you believe the words of a man who makes hired workers of his dacha call him nothing but "Master" and who is ready to dance on the pulpit of a hopak for a kilogram of dollars ?! Authority, after all, is an insidious thing, it is earned for years, but it goes bad instantly.
    2. +1
      April 28 2019 21: 40
      To understand the essence, you need to consider the source. Why look hu from mister Mikhalkov
    3. +1
      April 28 2019 22: 26
      Did you even see what he’ve been filming lately? And for what money? Questions are correct, but not with his mouth to talk about it.
    4. +4
      April 28 2019 22: 31
      Quote: VIT101
      They set about discussing Mikhalkov himself.

      So let him take the log out of his eye. He put his nuts on his fingers and sits in his mansions, despite the fact that over the past twenty years all his paintings have failed miserably, and the losses from them amounted to 60 millions of at least dollars, only according to official figures. He also begged a billion for pancakes.
      1. +1
        April 29 2019 03: 44
        If you can’t overcome the protest, head it! He kind of tried to overcome the Soviet past, but could not. They rolled him with his convictions. Now he decided to lead the process. How is this version of behavior?
        1. +1
          April 29 2019 09: 11
          Quote: Mister Creed
          Now he decided to lead the process. How is this version of behavior?

          Rather, he covers the rear just in case. Suddenly, the next president will criticize Putin, as he also criticized.
    5. +2
      April 29 2019 05: 38
      But how can one not discuss such an outstanding character. Somehow I heard over the edge of his program where he spoke quite flatteringly about Stalin. Almost justified.
      And this is the man who made Burnt by the Sun! Charles!
      It is impossible to even imagine a greater hypocrite.
  26. +2
    April 28 2019 21: 12
    The Russian "elite" is no longer just slaves! They need cultured and intelligent, believers in God and the king. A generation of "evil cubs" is growing and maturing, whose purpose is money, money, and again money. What kind of spirituality can we talk about in the world of capitalism, especially such as in Russia? The priests are the commissars of the bourgeoisie,
    people can no longer lead to submission. And the stratification of society and flagrant injustice, only aggravate the contradictions between the rich and the poor. Let Mikhalkov take off his pink glasses, look and shudder at the society in which he lives. They stole it, but they don’t know what to do next with money wassat The program crashed in the 90s, after an illegal seizure of power, and changes to it are not reversible. To understand this, a great mind is not required. The Stalinist regime and the real one is another question, which is worse. The people seem to have already understood, and therefore the rating of Stalin in Russia is growing, and Putin is falling. hi
    1. +3
      April 28 2019 21: 38
      Mikhalkov himself is an evil lupus. His whole family has always been snickering. He doesn’t know what ordinary people feel.
    2. +2
      April 29 2019 03: 46
      Outperform Putin's achievements of Stalin and his rating would increase. And so one zero in favor of Stalin. Compare successes in at least five, at least ten years of rule of one and the other.
  27. +2
    April 28 2019 21: 37
    I catch myself thinking, at the end of the story, that there is no clear and orderly plot construction.
    There is a set of fragments that cause, from time to time, increasing indignation and disgust.
    And then a comparison of Mikhalkov with a famous historical character - pop Gapon came to mind. Secret agent.
    Mikhalkov is a provocateur who throws into the people the most vile facts from the life of "ours" and "not ours."
    But whoever says it matters!
    Mikhalkov, Mikhalkovs - this is too significant a family. And they are licked by power.
    And this clan knows what and when to speak.
    When to praise, when to blaspheme.
    For they are in the "cage".
    I DO NOT BELIEVE!!!!!!!!
    I don’t believe that Nikita Sergeevich (Khrushchev was very pleased) speaks from the bottom of his heart.
    Most likely, he has such a task - "to burn the hearts of people with a verb" and they will open.
    And there it is the work of other gavriks.
  28. +5
    April 28 2019 21: 48
    The matrix has always been crooked.
    Because Nikita did this when he drowned first for Yeltsin and then for Putin.

    And his last films, too, did not twist the matrix weakly.

    And now he is hypocritically indignant. And he does, a great master.
  29. +1
    April 28 2019 22: 49
    As Nero said to himself: "What an artist disappears!" And such an admiration for my game, stage control.
    Stanislavsky is not enough to view.
  30. +1
    April 29 2019 10: 07
    Quote: atalef
    all night two young ladies educated about morality and art.

    Wash this advantage, not a disadvantage !! Two -One-enlightened all night ... I envy black envy !!!
  31. 0
    April 29 2019 11: 27
    But Mikhalkov speaks very approvingly about the person with whom it all began (I write with a small letter Gorbachev) and about his affairs)
  32. 0
    April 29 2019 11: 44
    When Soviet rubles were preserved in glass jars, that was normal, but when they began to conserve currency, it was a "failure of the matrix." Nikit, and you take it, open the "canned food" and make a couple of films with money from your "canned food" - stop begging for money from the "Cinema Fund". Then the disadvantaged will have a penny more money.

    It is always nice to start looking for the guilty aside from your beloved.
  33. +1
    April 29 2019 15: 21
    I watched. And did not see the thought. "Bad" is smeared over the fact of the story. Here they are bad, and how many more are. Enrichment in any form is the basis of capitalism. He begins to squeeze freedom in this matter only when it comes to maintaining the pyramid of power. And what is it about our country, which has recognized the truth of the "free economy"? Well, here are the consequences ... and a whole generation and the "bourgeois" stratum. To appease their appetites with exhortation? No. Nika. Business and business. Landing and landing. That's all. Have you started? Okay. Strengthen.
  34. +1
    April 30 2019 08: 08
    Well done man! everything is painted on the case, at least someone opens the eyes of us and young people what is happening around. And let’s we discuss it, Barin, chtol themselves white and fluffy? It is human nature to learn all life and rethink our views on things based on experience. And his films are wonderful, and whoever does not agree, he simply did not understand.
  35. +2
    April 30 2019 09: 38
    Teaching through the teeth of slaves, the gentleman was serene with sybaritism ...
  36. 0
    April 30 2019 14: 33
    What kind of morality can we talk about, how the members of the lake cooperative live and how state employees, pensioners and other workers for a salary of 10-15 thousand rubles survive, everyone knows and sees. They see how the oligarchy and officials of a certain rank and closeness to the body are raging with fat. And all this is procrastinating with calls for some kind of breakthroughs and a bright future about which they have been balaboling for 20 years.
  37. 0
    3 May 2019 10: 29
    Mikhalkov raises topics that are very important for society, in which he now has no equal.
  38. 0
    9 May 2019 22: 28
    Little son came to his father. And the little one asked: "What is good, what is bad?" -
    Friends, is that familiar? And the question of continuity. Will we discuss it?
  39. -1
    18 May 2019 21: 18
    Mikhalkov knows what he is talking about! The dude has direct telephone lines with the main religious destinations of the planet + a multi-channel mini-PBX for communication with local kings, under which representatives of his famous surname, and he himself, always adapted, sucked, stuck and successfully experienced. Being a nit is not for everyone!