A batch of upgraded Su-25CM3 attack aircraft entered the South Military District

Four deeply upgraded attack aircraft Su-25SM3 "Supergrach" entered one of the assault aviation Southern Military District, stationed in the Stavropol Territory, the press service of the South Military District.


A batch of upgraded Su-25CM3 attack aircraft entered the South Military District


According to the report, the new machines that arrived in the unit have already been tested by engineering and technical services and allowed to perform combat missions. Until the end of the year, the arrival of two more upgraded Su-25CM3 attack aircraft is expected.

Su-25M3 is a further modification of the Su-25CM attack aircraft. On the upgraded machines installed a digital display, which displays the ground and air situation, installed a new fire control system and satellite navigation GLONASS. The combat effectiveness of the machine has improved threefold compared with previous modifications. The aircraft is capable of hitting ground targets from a considerable distance, without entering into visual contact with a target, but only by coordinates.

The aircraft is designed to destroy small-sized mobile and stationary ground objects, as well as low-speed air targets.

Earlier it was reported that up to the level of the Su-25СМ3 it is planned to upgrade the entire existing fleet of Su-25 attack aircraft, including the Su-25СМ.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Piramidon April 18 2019 10: 56 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    new cars received in the unit

    New or old upgraded?
    1. kjhg April 18 2019 10: 59 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Of course modernized. They have not been released for a long time.
      1. Piramidon April 18 2019 11: 10 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Quote: kjhg
        Of course modernized. They have not been released for a long time.

        I know that they don’t let out. But it is written - "new."
      2. Labrador April 18 2019 22: 23 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The main thing is not sawed, but modernized! Good car. Still useful :)
    2. Tochilka April 18 2019 10: 59 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Old modernized. No one has been building a new one for a long time
    3. novel66 April 18 2019 11: 04 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      and will the Americans bring the A-10 to a super-teacher?
      1. spektr9 April 18 2019 11: 40 New
        • 2
        • 4
        -2

        and will the Americans bring the A-10 to a super-teacher?

        What is the sacred meaning in this?) If you need to bomb, that is, b-52 and use it

        If for a specific purpose, there are drones
        1. Piramidon April 18 2019 12: 58 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Quote: spektr9
          If you need to bomb, that is, b-52

          Have you confused strategists with attack aircraft?
          1. spektr9 April 18 2019 13: 00 New
            • 2
            • 8
            -6
            Have you confused strategists with attack aircraft?

            On the modern battlefield, the attack aircraft corpse defenses him for a sweet soul, bombing barmels with a strategist is several times cheaper than dropping attack aircraft towards them and throwing off bombs
            1. Piramidon April 18 2019 13: 23 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: spektr9
              bombing the barmalei with a strategist is cheaper at times,

              Please provide your calculations. How much cheaper, whom, when, and under what circumstances. You hinted about the “barmaley.” Do they have such a powerful air defense that you need to connect “strategists”? Then it’s better to hammer ICBMs on them.
              1. spektr9 April 18 2019 13: 30 New
                • 2
                • 5
                -3

                Please provide your calculations. How much cheaper, whom, when, and under what circumstances. You hinted about the “barmaley.” Do they have such a powerful air defense that you need to connect “strategists”? Then it’s better to hammer ICBMs on them.

                Let's calculate how much it costs to place attack aircraft on the basis of delivering fuel, shells and spare parts to them, how much it will cost to rent this base for the duration of the operation, how much money you need to spend on the RFP and delivering personnel to the base, how much it costs to cover it with air defense systems
                And how long will it take for one flight of a strategist whose bomb load is several times greater, who does not need a base near barmolei, and which are not guaranteed to be destroyed from portable air defense systems
                1. Piramidon April 18 2019 13: 39 New
                  • 3
                  • 2
                  +1
                  Quote: spektr9
                  Let's calculate how much it costs to place attack aircraft on the basis of delivering fuel, shells and spare parts to them ...

                  Dumb demagoguery, and stupid accounting. In your amateurish opinion, do strategists need neither service nor everything that you have listed here, which cost attack aircraft two orders of magnitude cheaper? negative
                  Py.Sy. If the "strategist" crashes, there will be much more graves and widows.
                  1. spektr9 April 18 2019 13: 44 New
                    • 2
                    • 7
                    -5

                    Dumb demagoguery, and stupid accounting. In your amateurish opinion, strategists do not need any service or everything that you have listed here, which is two orders of magnitude cheaper for attack aircraft

                    Build a fool out of yourself? lol Of course, building a base in another state (half the world from you), delivering attack aircraft to it and providing them with it, will be much cheaper than the flight of strategists, but with this tactic, attack aircraft are no longer two, but will be more expensive by ten orders of magnitude, and half bang them
                    So there’s nothing to bring nonsense, if the Russian Tu-95 weren’t converted to a missile carrier, they wouldn’t even send the Su-25 to Syria, although the Tu-160 and Tu-95 had to be used, there weren’t enough attack aircraft capabilities
                    1. Piramidon April 18 2019 14: 21 New
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      -1
                      Quote: spektr9
                      So there’s nothing to bring nonsense, if the Russian Tu-95 weren’t converted to a missile carrier, they wouldn’t even send the Su-25 to Syria, although the Tu-160 and Tu-95 had to be used, there weren’t enough attack aircraft capabilities

                      Did you understand that you stuffed it on your clave? A set of words of a drunk, dyavnoy amateur.
                      1. spektr9 April 18 2019 14: 23 New
                        • 2
                        • 6
                        -4
                        Did you understand that you stuffed it on your clave? A set of words of a dialect amateur.

                        I look at the arguments over, well, it’s not surprising that such nonsense is worth it. laughing
                      2. Piramidon April 18 2019 14: 31 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        Quote: spektr9
                        I look at the arguments over, well, it’s not surprising that such nonsense is worth it. laughing

                        The arguments on your part ended when you here stuttered into the account of "fools."
                      3. spektr9 April 18 2019 14: 49 New
                        • 3
                        • 5
                        -2
                        The arguments on your part ended when you here stuttered into the account of "fools."

                        Well, since I still have to call an individual who seriously believes that building a base for transferring attack aircraft to the n-place of the globe is cheaper than loading b-52 to send him to bomb undesirables? winked Sorry, I don’t see another term.

                        And notice that you have absolutely nothing to answer
                      4. novel66 April 19 2019 07: 21 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        Stepan hi , do not roll the beads, the right word is not in the horse ..
      2. novel66 April 18 2019 13: 00 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        there is a universal remedy - the death star!
  2. Piramidon April 18 2019 12: 51 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: novel xnumx
    and will the Americans bring the A-10 to a super-teacher?

    Take it cooler - with the billhook. good laughing
    1. novel66 April 18 2019 12: 53 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      about! two GAU-8 / A !!!! steepness immeasurable!
  3. Piramidon April 18 2019 12: 56 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: novel xnumx
    and will the Americans bring the A-10 to a super-teacher?

    Maybe before the chopper or the boar. laughing
  4. Paranoid50 April 18 2019 23: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: novel xnumx
    will bring the A-10 to a superbook

    About bringing - HZ (not a fact), but they extended their service, because in his "diocese" he has no alternative, like our "Rook". hi
    1. novel66 April 19 2019 07: 20 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      and there, a little higher, Mr. suggests replacing with strategists lol
      1. Paranoid50 April 19 2019 12: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: novel xnumx
        mister suggests replacing with strategists

        Only Sarmat, only hardcore !!! wassat
  • Civil April 18 2019 11: 51 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    This is the Soviet reserve for modernization.
  • g1v2 April 18 2019 11: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The most interesting - what will happen next? The Rook is not eternal. There is no state order for the development of a new generation attack aircraft and it seems that it is not expected, which means that in the future its functions will be assigned to someone else. For example, shock turntables and drones. request
    1. seti April 18 2019 11: 05 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Apparently not in vain is the development and development of a heavy shock drone.
    2. NKT
      NKT April 18 2019 11: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      PSH "Hornet-EP" seems to be forgotten.
      1. g1v2 April 18 2019 12: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Nothing is heard of this project at all and no work has been announced on it. So flashed infa in '12, but nothing serious. There was no further news. I didn’t hear that someone was really engaged in development. Again, the aircraft based on the su25 was voiced, that is, most likely it was about the next modernization of the rook.
        1. NKT
          NKT April 18 2019 13: 02 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          There was infa that Sukhoi was engaged in the development of an exclusive technical project of the ROC and even took a loan for this business. When upgraded to SM level, it was planned that they would last another 15-16 years and Hornet would replace them. Now, it’s clear that there isn’t, and a new upgrade has gone to SM3
      2. maximum 8 April 18 2019 12: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: NKT
        PSH "Hornet-EP" seems to be forgotten.

        In theory, a promising new-generation helicopter Kamov should replace the Su-25 attack aircraft in functionality in the future. At the end of last year, an article was posted on the site about a promising Kamov helicopter. Are the engines on the Su-25СМ3 attack aircraft interesting or are the new ones repaired?
        1. NKT
          NKT April 18 2019 13: 00 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Engines are old.

          .... In the process of modernizing the machine, it was decided not to touch the power plant - two R-95Sh turbojet engines with a thrust of 4100 kgf each, which before that had proved their vitality and reliability to the military. In addition, the fact that aircraft engines had a reserve to increase the resource was taken into account. At the same time, on Su-25 engines, by analogy with the Su-25T version, a revision was made related to surging ....
  • silberwolf88 April 18 2019 11: 11 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Attack aircraft will be in demand for a very long time ... and since it works in combat formations ... there are very great survivability risks ... therefore, its most promising direction will be its replacement in the future with strike drones ...
  • Warrior-80 April 18 2019 11: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It seems like on cm3, they put blocks against guided missiles. What significantly increases their survivability
  • Nikolaevich I April 18 2019 11: 51 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Mdaaa ... did not pass and ??? ... how many passed after the first messages about the modification of СМ3 ?!
  • Livonetc April 18 2019 15: 02 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: silberwolf88
    Attack aircraft will be in demand for a very long time ... and since it works in battle formations ... then there are very large survivability risks ... therefore, the most promising direction will be its replacement in the future with shock drones ...

    Friend
    Read the article.
    This is one of the most important distinguishing characteristics of the modernized machine.
    "The aircraft is capable of hitting ground targets from a considerable distance, without making visual contact with the target, but only in coordinates."
  • axiles100682 April 18 2019 21: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The attack aircraft is a workhorse. It will be in demand for a long time. If I’m not mistaken, the Americans also modernized their “warthog” not so long ago and refuse to assemble it. But the SU-25 is still handsome. good