A machine gun in a tin can. Shelf Containers from Springfield Arsenal

46
At the end of World War II, the United States was left with monstrous quantities of diverse military equipment. Reducing the army to the requirements of peacetime led to the release of the material part, which had to go somewhere. The army sold or simply handed out property to the allies, allowed it for processing or sent for storage. Especially for long-term storage of small weapons Available models in the Springfield arsenal have developed special containers.

In 1945, the American command reasonably decided that in the future the reduced army would not need most of the available small arms, and this property should not be taken up in warehouses. On the other hand, everyone was waiting for the start of a new war, and weapons could be needed at any time. In this regard, the Springfield arsenal received a special task. He had to develop a new method of long-term storage of temporarily unnecessary small arms. This method was supposed to ensure the storage of weapons without any service, but with the possibility of its quicker return to service.



A machine gun in a tin can. Shelf Containers from Springfield Arsenal
Rifle container


The task was solved in 1946-47. Arsenal has developed special metal containers suitable for storing several weapons. At its core, these were the usual larger-sized cans. Due to the different internal equipment such containers could be used with weapons of all basic types. Containers and inner inserts had the simplest design, however, their preparation for storage differed a certain complexity. But the implementation of all instructions allowed to store weapons for many years.

Container and its contents


The container from the Springfield arsenal was a metal barrel of predetermined dimensions. Thus, the container for the M1 Garand rifles was 47 inches high (1,2 m) and 15,875 inch diameter (403 mm). Less high “cans” were intended for pistols, and it was proposed to store machine guns in long and narrow containers.


Rifle container and its contents. The photo on the left shows the restraint and the tin can itself.


The cylindrical wall of the container was made by stamping metal sheet and welded along the joint; it had transverse stiffeners. On the ends provided covers for the covers. The covers were also stamped and had to be welded to the wall. New products were proposed to be made of steel or aluminum sheet. Aluminum containers were designed for large-caliber machine guns, steel - for other weapons.

Inside the container should install a holding device for weapons. There were several types of such devices designed for different "cargo". The simplest was a device for rifles or carbines. It consisted of two metal discs connected by a vertical bar. On the latter two curved holders were fixed with slots for mounting weapons. Such a holding device was also complemented by several straps covering the outside load.


Split container layout with M2 machine gun


A device of this type could be used with M1 Garand rifles and M1 Carbine family products, as well as with M1918 automatic rifles. Self-loading rifles and carbines, distinguished by a small section, were placed in a container in the amount of ten pieces. Half was mounted on the holders vertically with the barrel upwards, another five units were muzzled down. Then they were covered with a pair of belts. Larger BAR rifles were stored in five pieces, all in one position. Together with the weapon in the containers should be placed all the necessary supplies.

Large machine gun M2, for obvious reasons, completely occupied one container. Before packing, it was necessary to remove the barrel, after which the disassembled weapon was fixed in a special holding system on the basis of clips. Machine gun, if available, was stored separately.

An interesting holding device was developed for storing M1911 pistols. In this case, 10 stamped disks consistently fit inside the container, each of which had a figured lodgment for two pistols and two stores (two more were in the arms of the weapon). Pistols and shops were placed as close as possible and fit into the container section. The container for the Colts contained 10 drives: 20 pistols and 40 stores. The empty space in the center of the container, between the pistols, could be occupied by various accessories.


Canned Guns Colt M1911


For opening containers developed a special device. The unit weighing almost 14 kg was an enlarged version of a household can opener with a rotating wheel. Used manual transmission with transmission on two rotating wheels. The strength of the knife was sufficient for cutting the lids of the containers. "Opener" could be used in a portable form or be installed on any platform.

Preservation process


Before conservation, small arms should be cleaned with any approved solvent. Then it was required to cover it with AXS-1759 anti-corrosion compound. The anti-corrosion film made it possible to protect metal parts, as well as to simplify and speed up the re-entry process. After that, the weapon should be covered with a preservative grease.


During the test. The container is dented but retains airtightness.


The prepared weapon was mounted on holders and, if necessary, secured with straps. Also on the restraints were fixed stores, regular belts for carrying and other accessories. Metal cans with several pounds of silica gel, designed to remove moisture from the air, were also placed in a container and rigidly attached. The holding device with the weapon was placed in the container in the required position and practically without gaps. The movement of the device and weapons was excluded for the safety of the contents.

Then, in its place with the help of oxy-acetylene welding, the top cover was fixed. After installing the cover checked tightness. For this, the container was placed in water with a temperature of 180 ° F (82 ° C). Hot water forced the air in the container to expand and create excess pressure. Poor welding manifested itself bubbles. If necessary, the container was boiled again.


The result of testing one of the containers. A can of silica is ripped off (right), one of the rifles is damaged.


Then painting was carried out, also intended to protect the container and weapons. The surface of the container was degreased with steam, then phosphated and dried. After that, the steel containers were painted. They were applied two layers of enamel color "olive". Each layer was baked with infrared lamps for 5 minutes, after which 10-minute cooling was performed. This mode of heating and cooling allowed to exclude overheating of the contents and the creation of pressure that can break through the welds. Aluminum containers remained unpainted. Upon completion of processing on the side surface, stencils were applied with information about the contents, place and date of packaging, etc.

Tests and series


In 1947, the Springfield Arsenal produced an experimental batch of containers designed for extensive testing. Products with internal inserts for different weapons were checked. The containers were tested with rifles, pistols and machine guns, which made it possible to study their properties in all conditions.

The filled containers were shaken imitating loading and unloading. They were dropped from a height of 4 feet (1,2 m) at different angles on different surfaces, and also subjected to other external influences. The containers were also placed in a pressure chamber and the pressure was lowered, simulating the transportation of a military transport aircraft in an unpressurized cabin. After such bullying, the containers carried multiple chips and dents, but remained airtight.


Opening and checking a container with M1 Garand rifles


Having opened the "barrels", the testers discovered a whole and efficient weapon. Only in one container did a metal can of silica gel fall from the bindings and crush the wooden parts of the rifles. According to the results of such inspections, containers of the Springfield Arsenal were recommended for production and operation.

Conservation of weapons using new tools began in the same year 1947 and lasted several years. The army planned to send for storage several hundred thousand weapons, and this required a lot of time. The necessary work was carried out by all major US arsenals. According to known data, in 1948, the 87,3 of thousands of M1 Garand rifles were conserved in 1949, and more than 220 of thousands of such items were put into containers in XNUMX, not counting weapons of other models.

Containers with weapons distributed among various military warehouses. Usually they were stored by the same compounds that were to use weapons in the event of war.


In the process of extracting M1 carbines


In the spring of 1959, the Springfield Arsenal opened several containers with different weapons to check the status of the latter. The weapon stayed in the 12 packaging for years, and after that it was possible to draw conclusions about the real possibilities of the original method of storage. It turned out that all samples retain good condition and after a short preparation can return to the service. The weapon had no mechanical damage, there was no rust or mold on it. It is curious that several Arsenal employees who participated in the opening and inspection of containers in the past contributed to their development or preparation for storage.

From storage to disposal


According to different sources, the containers of the Springfield Arsenal have been used for several decades. After that, they were abandoned for the most banal reasons. The army was gradually removing obsolete models like the M1 Garand and M1 Carbine. In parallel, various deliveries of weapons from stock to warehouses were carried out. Pistols, rifles and machine guns were removed from containers and sent abroad, to museums, to the civilian market or to the smelter.


"Tin" with BAR rifles


At a minimum, the vast majority of containers after opening were disposed of as unnecessary, often together with the contents. Several such items have survived and are now on display at the American Museum. First of all, the containers are at the museum at the Springfield arsenal. According to various estimates, individual containers may still remain in army warehouses, but such assumptions appear to be untrue.

Apparently, a number of containers could get into private collections, but only in the opened form. According to American law, a container of weapons can not be completely sold to a private person. It is necessary to prepare documents for each unit, for which the container should be opened. Naturally, this dramatically reduces its collection value.

The original solution using sealed metal containers was proposed due to a sharp reduction in the army and its active arsenals. Over time, the US armed forces got rid of the surplus military products accumulated as a result of the Second World War, and new arsenals were formed in accordance with current requirements. The need for special long-term storage containers disappeared. Over the past few decades, the US Army has been using sealed containers only for storing ammunition, while weapons are being sold with more traditional closures. "Tin cans" for small arms are a thing of the past.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    19 May 2019 05: 44
    It’s convenient for saboteurs to reset! You can go into the water without parachutes! It won’t drown.
    1. -1
      19 May 2019 05: 52
      without a parachute it will crash into water.
    2. 0
      19 May 2019 07: 38
      Quote: Theodore
      You can go into the water without parachutes! It won’t drown.

      Most likely drown. There, the weight of the hoo, buoyancy is clearly negative.
      1. +5
        19 May 2019 10: 56
        Quote: Kuroneko
        Most likely drown. There, the weight of the hoo, buoyancy is clearly negative.

        Let's estimate: the container for the M1 Garand rifles had a height of 47 inches (1,2 m) and a diameter of 15,875 inches (403 mm). We consider ... we get a volume of 150 liters.
        Self-loading rifles and carbines, characterized by a small cross section, were placed in a container in the amount of ten pieces.
        How much does a rifle weigh? Take 5 kg + 25 per barrel and brackets - we get 75 kg.
        A 150 liter barrel weighing 75 kg will float perfectly.
        1. +3
          19 May 2019 11: 29
          Actually pay attention to the photo in the article. Where the container is checked for leaks. He swims there.
          1. 0
            21 May 2019 04: 08
            Could check and empty.
            1. 0
              21 May 2019 10: 03
              What's the point?
              The text of your comment is too short and in the opinion of the site administration does not carry useful information.
              1. +1
                21 May 2019 17: 04
                Although no, I was mistaken with this assumption, it says under the photo that there are ten rifles in the container.
  2. +5
    19 May 2019 06: 03
    An interesting solution.
    As a continuation of the article, you could talk about the conservation of military aircraft in the USA.
  3. +4
    19 May 2019 06: 52
    They showed, somehow on TV, the warehouses where the captured weapons are stored, even from the time of the Great Patriotic War. Everything is chin-chinar: lubricated, laid and in working condition. Honestly, I was surprised.
    1. +7
      19 May 2019 07: 38
      Quote: kvs207
      Everything is chin-chinar: lubricated, laid and in working condition.

      It takes a lot of work

      And here, in principle, to take one step is to replace the oxygen-containing atmosphere in the container with something more adequate, and you will get almost eternal storage.
      1. +9
        19 May 2019 07: 43
        Quote: Spade
        And here, in principle, to take one step is to replace the oxygen-containing atmosphere in the container with something more adequate

        Not required. If the jar is airtight, the available oxygen will be consumed very quickly for oxidation (very small) and that’s all - this is an anaerobic environment. Here, rather, in the long run, some components of the lubricant can affect more.
        1. -1
          19 May 2019 07: 57
          Quote: Kuroneko
          Not required. If the jar is airtight, the available oxygen will be consumed very quickly for oxidation (very small) and that’s all - this is an anaerobic environment. Here, rather, in the long run, some components of the lubricant can affect more.

          The problem is preservative lubricant. I am sure it should not be. Therefore, the replacement of air with another gas.
          1. +6
            19 May 2019 08: 01
            Damn, I’m saying that this is simply not necessary. Oxygen will quickly leave and that's all, there will be nothing to oxidize. If later any other reactions from lubrication (alkaline or acidic - by the way, distinguish between oxide and acid, it sounds similar, but the essence is completely different), then they will go in an oxygen-free atmosphere and they will not care for the surrounding inert environment.
            1. 0
              19 May 2019 08: 03
              Quote: Kuroneko
              Oxygen will quickly leave and that's it

              In a hundred years? These are not canned food, there is much more oxygen here.
              1. +5
                19 May 2019 08: 10
                Iron is also a little more than in organic, do not you? But for some reason, the bacteria do not really like to eat it. Well, formed, figuratively speaking, one rusty speck on one of the rifles. That's it (just in case, I’ll remind you that only 1/5 in the air is oxygen; almost everything else is just inert nitrogen and a bit of noble gases).
                And in poor-quality stew, the few available oxygen is consumed very quickly - the only problem is that the unfinished bacteria, and this little, is enough to clog the stew with toxins to toxicity. But we don’t seem to need to eat rifles, right?
                1. +4
                  19 May 2019 08: 17
                  Quote: Kuroneko
                  Iron is also a little more

                  Moreover, iron is mostly protected from corrosion

                  Quote: Kuroneko
                  Well, formed, figuratively speaking, one rusty speck on one of the rifles.

                  And it is formed in the most unpleasant places. Where to apply anti-corrosion coatings is impossible. For example, the bore
                  1. +4
                    19 May 2019 08: 20
                    Quote: Spade
                    And it is formed in the most unpleasant places. Where to apply anti-corrosion coatings is impossible. For example, the bore

                    Я more I repeat once again: there is enough oxygen there, hyperbolizing, only for the formation of exactly one or two small spots of rust (in fact, for the finest nano-foci, which even cannot be pulled by the slightest coating of rust). After that oxygen END!
                    And with rifles will be full of norms.
                    = _ =
                    PS Fe2O3 is iron oxide (Ferrum-2-O-3). Rust. And already from the formula it is clear that oxygen should be one and a half times more than this iron itself. And oxygen is a gas, it is very discharged on its own (and 1/5 in the atmosphere also). In short, there will always be negligible amount of rust in such a solid container!
                    1. 0
                      19 May 2019 08: 57
                      Quote: Kuroneko
                      I repeat once again: there is enough oxygen there, hyperbolizing, only for the formation of exactly one or two small spots of rust

                      Yes, the fir trees are burning ... It's not canned food, where there is a minimum of air, and oxygen is even less. In such containers, the main part of the volume is occupied by air
                      1. +1
                        19 May 2019 10: 23
                        Lopatov, Kuronenko rights.
                      2. 0
                        19 May 2019 10: 29
                        Naturally right. That is why all kinds of retrogrades are spent tons of pusala on ammunition in airtight tubes.
                      3. +2
                        19 May 2019 10: 37
                        There, a gel was laid to remove moisture from the air.
                        About "pushsalo" - so the usual gun grease will drain and open the unprotected metal - which theoretically can lead to a raid of rust. Which is erased without problems with ordinary rags or brushes.
    2. +3
      19 May 2019 08: 19
      Recently in the Baltic states they found a crypt, with several containers, of German saboteurs. Everything is in good condition.


      1. +3
        19 May 2019 10: 01
        Weapons, radio stations, Soviet banknotes, etc., were supplied by the British secret services to the Baltic forest brothers, whom the idea was to use in reconnaissance and sabotage work against the USSR in the 1950s. There is such a book "Blue Triangle" with documentary photographs of everything that was sent and found at the forest brothers.
    3. 0
      19 May 2019 11: 26
      Quote: kvs207
      They showed, somehow on TV, the warehouses where the captured weapons are stored, even from the time of the Great Patriotic War. Everything is chin-chinar: lubricated, laid and in working condition. Honestly, I was surprised.

      The “clever men” from the RF Ministry of Defense have already “thought of” how to use all this rare trophy wealth to be melted down into the banal steps of the Central Church of the Ministry of Defense ?! request
      1. 0
        20 May 2019 19: 55
        Why store it? Most of the weapons in the Second World War due to lack of materials were produced using simplified technology and with the use of substitutes. This gunner is suitable only for short-term use, which during the war is justified. For example, the production of 1941-1945 TT after 700 framed shots can knock out your eye.
        1. 0
          20 May 2019 21: 30
          About TT and its resource, materials and technologies of its production in different years I am aware. Yes
          One of my American friends bought on the Internet from Finland (for a sum more than he bought the Bulgarian PM) a Soviet TT release in 1942, with traces of rust, from Finnish trophies, and pored over it, dismantled, assembled and gasped that this pistol was probably "with history" and "removed by the Finns from the killed Soviet officer" ?!
          In the same way, he acquired a "military edition" revolver Nagant. From TT and Nagant he shoots very rarely and no more than two magazines (drums), i.e. 16-14 cartridges a couple of times a year, ordered cartridges are delivered by mail and thrown under the door of the apartment - he said that his Negro neighbors have pistols of a completely different caliber, so no one steals these tetesh cartridges, and lie under the door while he himself will not pick up!
          And our post-Soviet collectors MMG (it is impossible to shoot from it!) And completely "on the drum" of what steel the blank sample is made, but the "authenticity of the parts", the year of issue and the "history" are also important - it is better when the weapon "was in action ", and not immediately went to the warehouse from the factory!
          So, weapons of military production, especially trophy ones (FACT EXACTLY IT WAS SPEAKED ABOUT!), Of the German Wehrmacht (it is known how much collectors and reenactors all over the world are "thrilled" over it), even made using ersatz technologies, provided with the corresponding documented " legend "can be sold very profitably, both combat and hollow!
          Attention, with the proceeds you can buy new machines and tools for arsenals or build houses and give apartments to servicemen! And it’s not stupid, mediocre and mismanaged to melt under the "far-fetched" symbolism - in winter and autumn, on icy, and in spring and summer, on wet SLIDING STEEL steps, a lot of people, especially old people and children, will break their legs and ankles and They will smash the backs of their heads going up or out of the temple - so people will curse this place !!!
          And the aura from the weapon that killed people, our people, is very bad — it would be unpleasant for me to think that these steps are made of weapons that killed and injured my relatives — one of my uncles died, having already met Victory in Berlin and having signed on the Reichstag- he wrote a letter from Berlin home that the war was over and he stayed to live, that he would return, but was killed near Brno on May 10, 1945, and is buried there!
          So, I am against such sacrilege and Defilement, so that lethal steps lead to the Main Army Temple !!! After all, the enemy banners that were abandoned at the Victory Parade of 1945, at the foot of the Mausoleum, were burned to the ground, swept out and washed away, so that their spirit would not exist, but here the enemy is going to perpetuate in this way ?! IMHO
  4. +2
    19 May 2019 07: 35
    Damn, cool, but a little expensive. Especially when you consider that the whole technical process - not much different from the production of stew - is started for essentially outdated weapons (well, that is, at the time of conservation, it can still be new, but it will inevitably become outdated). Unlike stew - which is always the topic when it rumbles in the belly.
    1. +1
      19 May 2019 18: 30
      I don’t understand this mismanagement! How are weapons out of date? Doesn't kill? Ammo no longer for him? Eat better - good, use it. But what is created why melt? You never know how life goes. And such canned food could be bred in cities and villages, so that in case of trouble people would not die unarmed.
      1. 0
        26 May 2019 13: 11
        how do you think canned food with ak how soon will become obsolete, svd? shteer there if? canning with brand?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +2
    19 May 2019 08: 08
    In our wooden crates, the metal parts of the weapons were simply covered with gun oil and the pistols were simply in the pads and on the shelving, this is what I saw among the Americans, it was apparently invented for the subsequent arming of pro-American formations in other countries by air discharge
    1. +4
      19 May 2019 08: 18
      Quote: CommanderDIVA
      by air discharge

      8)))))
      Rather, it is imprisoned for transportation by sea.
      1. +2
        19 May 2019 08: 35
        Well, the aggressive effects of sea salt
    2. +2
      19 May 2019 08: 24
      Most often with us they are covered with an abundant layer of solid oil, and the wooden parts were covered with linseed oil, and in some cases the bayonets were covered with burnishing (but this was very rare).
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +3
    19 May 2019 10: 38
    Very interesting. Thanks to the author. hi
  8. +2
    19 May 2019 11: 13
    Interesting article! good Now I understood where the legs of American sealed containers for storage (in an inert gas environment) of spare aircraft engines (discovered in the warehouses of the Kamran naval base after the end of the American-Vietnamese war and studied by Soviet aviation specialists) are growing - it turns out that it is not "out of the blue" they were invented!
    1. 0
      19 May 2019 15: 24
      Quote: pishchak
      Now I understand where the legs of American sealed containers for storage (in an inert gas environment) of spare aircraft engines (found in the warehouses of the Kamran naval base after the end of the American-Vietnamese war) come from
      This is a protection against bacteria. "With the development of jet aviation, which uses kerosene as a fuel (fuel), the number of cases of bio-damage to aviation fuels is increasing. Fuels and fuel systems, as well as ground storage tanks for petroleum products, are damaged." https://everything.surf/article/18013385-bakterii-v-aviatsionnom-kerosine-i-chem-oni-opasny
  9. AB
    0
    19 May 2019 11: 24
    I wonder why they chose the shape of the container in the form of a cylinder. A bunch of inconveniences for warehousing, transportation, etc.
    1. +1
      19 May 2019 17: 22
      Quote: AB
      I wonder why they chose the shape of the container in the form of a cylinder.

      Minimum surface area with maximum volume for a given shape. It's simple - high school level geometry. Metal saving (the shape of cans or industrial steel barrel containers is also not just like that - cylindrical). Plus higher mechanical strength. Only a sphere is more economical in surface area, but spherical horses in a vacuum are really inconvenient to turn over (and to store the horses themselves inside).
  10. 0
    19 May 2019 14: 24
    Very interesting article))) Thanks to the author.
  11. +1
    19 May 2019 16: 10
    According to the practice of the 20th century - in dry, cool arsenals in wooden cases, weapons are stored longer than necessary.
  12. 0
    19 May 2019 22: 46
    Such labor costs !!! It’s easier with us, they heated it up, put it into it, raised it, cooled down. They put them in boxes and ... we sit smoking.
  13. 0
    26 May 2019 09: 29
    Some kind of garbage.
    And from a purely economic point of view.
    These warranties after the war were sold at a price of 5-10 dollars.
    And this conservation?
    1. The manufacture of a steel container, and even more so an aluminum one, with a rack inside and with a can of silica gel - money.
    2. Brew this container gently, without burning through the metal container. And to brew an ALUMINUM container - generally a song - is a lot of money and time.
    3. Be sure that welding and heating the metal of the container did not damage the contents of the container.
    4. It is not possible to monitor the status of the contents during storage, because To do this, the container will need to be opened, but in fact - destroyed. And the slightest fistula in a welded seam or rusted body will inevitably lead to damage to property.
    5. Storage of upright cylinders will take up a lot of space.
    6. And the three-line \ PPSh was greased with cannon fat or solid oil, laid in flat boxes and stacked even to the ceiling. At any moment, I opened the drawer, inspected the weapon and closed it again. I was in such a storage near Vladivostok.
    Conclusions:
    1. Either American idiocy and stupidity (see Zadornova).
    2. Or the desire to cut down the headstock for free.
    3. Or packing weapons for special operations to discharge, for example, from the air into water bodies for any rebels (Estonians, Poles, Albanians).
    4. Research work at the expense of the state like "What will happen if a cockroach is torn off 3 legs?"
    1. 0
      26 May 2019 13: 24
      Why brew? The technology is the same as that of canned food - ordinary crimping (even more so if under heating - I note that heating in this case can be - and will be - really point-like, like in soldering stations, for example). It works even better with aluminum. metal is very ductile even at "room temperature".
      Do not believe me - try to open a can of stew without a can opener - it's easy. Enough of any hard and rather rough surface (or file). Slightly cut the rim from all sides over the entire area - and voila, the can is open. When welding, such a hell would have happened.
      1. 0
        26 May 2019 16: 25
        This is you writing to me "Why brew?".
        I read in the article:
        --- "The cylindrical wall of the container was made by stamping from a metal sheet and welded along the joint; it had transverse stiffening ribs. The sides for the lids were provided at the ends. The covers were also stamped and had to be welded to the wall."
  14. 0
    5 July 2019 00: 40
    Wimps. At our place, the MO today has 3 million stores and 250 machine guns only of captured German Mausers. Our weapons are certainly no less.