Combat "Gremlins" US Air Force: the revival of the concept of aircraft carrier aircraft

21
The word "carrier" is usually associated with a huge ship carrying hundreds of aircraft and thousands of crew. However in development aviation many attempts have been made to use another aircraft-aircraft skeleton or airship as the carrier of aircraft.

Projects of aircraft carriers were developed back in the First World War. In the UK, the Bristol Scout fighter was deployed on the Porte Baby aircraft in order to increase the effectiveness of the fight against German airships.

In turn, the Germans considered placing fighters on board the airship to protect them from British fighters. In the 1917, the Albatros D.III fighter was dropped from the zeppelin L-35, which then made a safe landing.



Both the British and the German aircraft carrier projects have not gone beyond the test stage.


The Bristol Scout fighter on the Porte Baby aircraft and the Albatros D.III fighter under the airship L-35


After the First World War, the Americans took the baton. They made several attempts to create airships - carriers of fighters intended for marine reconnaissance. Huge airships fleet US Akron and Macon were to carry four to five Curtiss F9C Sparrowhawk fighters. Both aircraft carriers crashed, after which the US airship program was curtailed.


The airship USS Akron (ZRS-4) and the release of the fighter through the T-shaped notch in the hull


In the USSR, the project of the flying aircraft carrier "Link" was developed since the beginning of the 30-s of the XX century. The heavy bombers TB-1 and TB-3 were envisaged as carriers, and the bombers TB-7 and MTB-2 were considered in the future. As fighters, as the project progressed, the planes were intended: I-4, I-5, I-Z, I-16. The work was carried out quite actively, many conceptual projects were considered and practical tests were conducted. In the future, it was planned to create an aircraft with eight aircraft on board (two aircraft should be installed immediately and six more docked after takeoff). Plans prevented the war.

By the beginning of World War II, a project of an improved aircraft carrier Zveno-SPB (SBP, a composite dive bomber) was implemented. During the 1941-1942 years, the aircraft "Zveno-SPB" made several dozen combat missions, destroying the enemy’s target targets and engaging in combat with fighters. Several fighters were lost, but in general the experience can be considered successful.


Left experimental “Link-2” - three I-5 fighters on the upgraded TB-3, on the right a small-scale “Link-SPB” - two I-16 fighters under the wings of TB-3


Why the project has not received development? Initially, the war prevented, and then, perhaps due to the fact that the era of jet aviation was near, and with jets, such tricks are much more difficult to do. However, during the Cold War years, aircraft carrier projects were developed both in the United States and in the USSR.

At the beginning of the 50s of the 20th century, the United States was preoccupied with the aviation cover of the strategic bombers Convair B-36, which were intended to attack the Soviet Union. Since the existing fighters could not cover the bombers on the entire flight route due to the short range, the idea was born of creating a special fighter intended for transportation on a bomber. Such a fighter was implemented under the project of McDonnell - XF-85 Goblin. The tests were successful, the fighter developed speed to 1043 km / h and could operate at altitudes up to 14 249 meters, and generally flew well, despite the extremely specific design. The fighter’s armament consisted of four 12,7 mm machine guns with 1200 ammunition.

The program was closed due to difficulties with the docking of the fighter and the carrier, and the appearance of new fighters in the USSR, the flight data of which significantly exceeded the capabilities of the XF-85.


Test reset of the XF-85 fighter from the Boeing EB-29В bomber and the XF-85 Goblin itself close-up


In another American project, Tom-Tom, the concept was considered from a bunch of modernized EB-29A bomber and two EF-84B fighters docked to it. Fighters attached to the bomber for wingtips flexible attachments. The whole structure was extremely unstable, and its aerodynamics left much to be desired. After several incidents the project was closed.


Modernized EB-29A bomber and two fighters docked to it


During the Vietnam War, the US Air Force used reconnaissance Drones AQM-34 Firebee launched from a DC-130 control aircraft. After conducting reconnaissance, Firebees released a parachute and were picked up in the air by a multi-purpose helicopter.


UAVs AQM-34 Firebee under the wings of the aircraft DC-130 and the evacuation of the UAV by helicopter


In the USSR, a draft of a kind of two-stage bomber was considered. In the Tu-95H cargo compartment in a semi-submerged state, the RS supersonic bomber was to be placed at a speed of flight up to 3000 km / h. After resetting the RS outside the enemy’s air defense zone, the Tu-95H returned to the airfield, and the RS bomber carried out a supersonic throw to the target at an altitude of up to 30 000 meters, after which it returned to the base independently. The development of the project was stopped at the stage of creating a modernized aircraft carrier Tu-95H.


Sketch of a supersonic RS bomber intended for launch with Tu-95H


After this, the projects of air carriers for a long time have sunk into oblivion.

In the 21st century, active introduction of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) begins in the air forces of the leading countries of the world. In fact, it is more correct to call remote-manned vehicles (RPVs), since the main tasks are most often solved by the operator, sometimes located in the other hemisphere of the Earth, from the site of the UAV / RPV.

However, the development of automation tools allows you to shift more and more actions to control systems, allowing you not to fly a UAV, but to give it commands to perform certain actions.

The use of UAVs is considered both separately (individually or in groups), and in conjunction with manned combat aircraft and helicopters. Concepts of joint operations with UAVs are being actively developed for F-35 fighters and AH-64D / E Apache helicopters.


F-35 fighter with driven UAVs (concept)


One of the contenders for the role of the Slave for the F-35, F-22 and other combat aircraft was the recently demonstrated Kratos company XQ-58A UAV. This UAV has a wingspan of 8,2 m, its length is 9,1 m. A combat load of 272 kg can be placed on the external suspension and in the internal compartments. The drone is able to fly at altitudes up to 13,7 of thousands of subways and belongs to the class of near-sonic devices with a long range. The UAV XQ-58A Valkyrie project is considered one of the closest to adoption.


Slave XQ-58A Valkyrie UAV



Demonstration flight of the XQ-58A Valkyrie UAV, held in March 2019

Another project driven by UAV is being developed by Boeing. Flight range should be about 3700 km. It is planned to work together with such aircraft as the F-35, EA-18G, F / A-18E / F fighters, E-7 Poseidon anti-aircraft, and the E-8 anti-aircraft. Initially, the tasks of reconnaissance and electronic warfare (EW) are assigned to the UAV. The development and production of UAVs is supposed to be deployed in Australia to circumvent export procedures required by US law.

Combat "Gremlins" US Air Force: the revival of the concept of aircraft carrier aircraft

The concept of the slave UAV company Boeing


In Russia, the role of the slave is predicted on the prospective UAV Hunter. Supposedly, the Hunter UAV will be able to operate in conjunction with the fifth-generation fighter Su-57. It should be noted that the use of UAVs as slaves for fighters or AWACS aircraft may become the most realistic scenario for the Russian Air Force at the present time. The absence of global high-speed satellite communication channels limits the flight range of Russian UAVs when operating from ground points, and using an aerial platform as a command point will significantly expand their radius of action.


Su-57 multipurpose fighter and its alleged slave Hunter UAV


Thus, we can assume that the concept of the interaction of manned aircraft and helicopters with UAVs is one of the most promising areas for the development of the Air Force. But what does this have to do with aircraft carriers?

In September, 2015, the DARPA agency, announced the Gremlins program. The essence of the program is the creation of compact reusable multifunctional UAVs capable of being placed on air carriers - the C-17, C-130 Hercules transport aircraft and the B-52 Stratofortress, B-1B Lancer bombers, and later on tactical aircraft. Four companies were attracted to development: Composite Engineering, Dynetics, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems and Lockheed Martin.


Image of the Gremlins program from the DARPA website


The company General Atomics Aeronautical presented in 2016, the layout of the UAV, developed under the program Gremlins. The General Atomics presented UAV is designed to run from a C-130 Hercules transport aircraft. The drone received a folding wing and a jet engine and the device looks like a JASSM cruise missile. His trials are scheduled to begin in 2019.


Model of the UAV announced by the General Atomics Aeronautical company according to the Gremlins program


Dynetics unveiled its Gremlins experience in March 2019. The design of the UAV should allow them to carry various types of payload, depending on the combat mission, and to participate in autonomous as well as group unmanned operations (as part of the "swarm"). After completing the mission, the aircraft carrier must take the UAV and deliver it to the operational base, where the ground crew prepares them for the next operation during 24 hours.


Image and prototype of the UAV company Dynetics program Gremlins



Capturing a Gremlin UAV and boarding a carrier



Gremlin UAV control point on board the aircraft



Presentation of the company Dynetics on the program Gremlin

According to the terms of reference of the DARPPA UAV Gremlin must be able to perform at least 20 launches from the aircraft carrier (limited-reusable design). Perhaps in the future, this figure will be adjusted.

How promising is this project for the Air Force? In my opinion, the potential of the Gremlins program is quite high.

One carrier based on a transport aircraft with dozens of UAVs. Gremlin will be able to control a huge territory, quickly receiving information about the enemy and, if necessary, making decisions about his destruction. Potentially, Gremlin UAV groups can serve as a huge aperture antenna for detecting subtle or distant objects.

Flocks of "Gremlins" can be used to break through the air defense (AD) of the enemy. In this case, part of the UAV can carry specialized ammunition, part of the EW equipment, and if necessary, Gremlins themselves can act as weapons of destruction.



As part of the ammunition of strategic bomber UAVs, Gremlin can be used for defense against enemy fighters, of course, provided they are equipped with the appropriate ammunition.

Opportunities for jamming the enemy can be compensated for by creating highly secure communication channels, for example, as a backup, a one-way optical communication channel can be used via a laser beam a certain point). Improving management systems, using the capabilities of neural networks, will increase the autonomy of the UAV in terms of decision-making, reducing their dependence on human control.

It is not necessary to dwell on the need for a tough bundle of UAV and carrier. Potentially, various tactical groups can be implemented, for example, a tactical group consisting of an ARLO aircraft, an unmanned tanker, and a group of four to eight UAVs. Such a tactical group can solve the tasks of air defense, isolation of the combat area, enemy air defense breakthrough and many others.

Thus, the program of aircraft carriers, not developed in the XX century, in our time can be implemented at a new technological level. The interaction of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles will determine the capabilities of the world air forces of world powers in at least the first half of the 21st century.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 8 2019 05: 38
    If it’s an air carrier, then I think the correct approach to creating a UAV with folding wings, similar to the KR. If you adjust the size, then the same bombers, carriers of the Kyrgyz Republic may well carry the same number of UAVs as missiles. And the issue with the carriers will be resolved.
    1. 0
      April 8 2019 06: 07
      do not pilot an UAV, but give him commands
      and exclude the "weak link" - the person!
      1. 0
        April 8 2019 06: 36
        For when exchanging UAVs for a manned aircraft, the party that lost the UAV wins.
  2. 0
    April 8 2019 08: 24
    Perspectives are promising!
    We have yet to see which concepts will be implemented in practice.
  3. 0
    April 8 2019 08: 55
    F-35 fighter with driven UAVs (concept)

    I can’t imagine how drones can be controlled in a single-seat aircraft.
    1. 0
      April 8 2019 10: 13
      In automatic mode, with reference to the airborne radar, as well as the initial distribution of targets among themselves.
    2. -1
      April 8 2019 14: 20
      "how drones can be controlled in a single-seat plane" ////
      -----
      Can. In F-35 - a developed autopilot. The pilot may not keep the helm (even on bends), but focus on controlling drones.
      1. 0
        April 8 2019 22: 34
        ))) on the bends)) hold on tightly to the driver the ram - which damn turns in the air and autopilots on airplanes have been developed and underdeveloped for at least 20-30 years.
      2. -2
        April 9 2019 09: 44
        But how does the plane know what to turn?
        IMHO, f-18 are much better suited for this purpose.
        especially growlers.
  4. +1
    April 8 2019 10: 29
    As a disorientation of the enemy’s air defense, a swarm of UAVs under the control of AWACS is also very successful. Otherwise, everything is very doubtful. Who will tolerate other people's drones in their airspace? They will either be knocked down or hammered in by obstacles and they themselves will fall to the ground.
    1. +3
      April 8 2019 12: 26
      where did you get the idea that the drone is easily hammered?
      it can have an autonomous task without external control
      for example, just fly in line to a new team
  5. +2
    April 8 2019 15: 22
    The task of the United States is the release of the overwhelming number of combat drones, the number of targets of a potential enemy.
  6. 0
    April 8 2019 17: 03
    In this case, part of the UAV can carry specialized ammunition, part of the electronic warfare, if necessary, the Gremlins themselves can act as weapons.

    Generally an interesting concept. He fired a cruise missile, and then she returned under the belly. As it all is "dumb".
  7. 0
    April 8 2019 22: 41
    It's all crap guys, the point is that you don’t take any drone if it has less detection and attack means on board than on a modern IFI, then there’s no sense in it. And if he has it all, he will be worth a little less than modern IFIs. That is, we again rest against modern IFIs.
    But high-speed, highly maneuverable fighters with cannon weapons, an optical guidance system and external command target designation, yes, they will probably go. They will be able to carry out both protection against missile defense, as well as the fight against MFIs - but then again only if they have hypersonic speeds otherwise it all makes no sense.
    Perhaps the use of such cannon drones in the size of the Kyrgyz Republic and good armor for ground attack, the speed of transonic protection from small arms, that is, machines for replacing a 10 and su 25, although it is also doubtful.
  8. +1
    April 9 2019 00: 22
    Gremlins region is an interesting and promising topic! Swarm attack, swarm interaction in battle there are a lot of issues that we have not worked out at all. In my opinion, only China and the United States are seriously studying this area today. More to such articles!
  9. +1
    April 9 2019 05: 57
    Well, a ground platform for a swarm of combat drones - not an option?
  10. -1
    April 9 2019 08: 28
    Yes, here we already need the S-1000.
  11. 0
    April 9 2019 10: 36
    A UAV is a dead-end branch of the development of shock systems in a series of local wars. With effective opposition, the UAV becomes almost one-time and economically loses initially to one-time missiles.
    1. 0
      April 9 2019 14: 48
      Quote: Sancho_SP
      A UAV is a dead-end branch of the development of shock systems in a series of local wars. With effective opposition, the UAV becomes almost one-time and economically loses initially to one-time missiles.


      What is effective opposition?
  12. 0
    April 10 2019 06: 10
    Weapons Yodu Udont must be used anti-swarm.
  13. 0
    16 May 2019 19: 25
    The United States is developing a drone launch system for the MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft in service with the United States Marine Corps. It is reported by "Nplus1" with reference to MarineCorpsTimes.

    In the United States, the development of a new drone was launched, intended to be launched from tweeterplanes, and work is being carried out by the US Marine Corps War Lab. It is planned that with the help of a new drone, the crew of the convertoplan will be able to reconnoiter the situation at the landing site, since the MV-22 do not have and cannot provide fire support during the landing.

    The program is supposed to equip the tiltrotor with one AFARS reconnaissance drone with a rocket engine, which will be launched from the tail section of the MV-22 Osprey, where it has a ramp.

    The developed drone itself has a 1,8 meter in length, is capable of rising to a height of up to 7,6 thousands of meters and carrying a payload of 2 kg. The flight range is 306 kilometers, while at a distance of up to 93 km from the carrier, it is capable of supporting data exchange with the operator. Other details of the project are not disclosed.


    https://topwar.ru/157925-konvertoplany-mv-22-osprey-kmp-ssha-osnastjat-razvedyvatelnymi-dronami.html