They defeated Napoleon. Part of 2. Heroes of Eylau

19
The main character of Prolesis-Eylau, the first battle that Napoleon could not win, was certainly a Russian soldier. A true professional, who since the time of Peter I was made, was not only long and hard to teach military affairs, but also to feed, clothe, and shoe well, and also to provide the best weapons at that time.

Under the command of such generals as Rumyantsev and Suvorov, and then their students, a Russian soldier could defeat anyone. Napoleon’s comrades had time to feel it for themselves, and the 1805 campaign of the year was not easy for him, but at Austerlitz, the tragic mistakes of the headquarters and the actual elimination of M.I. Kutuzov, then a general from Infantry, were solved by the command.





Under Eylau, the Russian soldiers did everything they could to win, and even more. Fortunately, they did not have to repeat Weyrother's unsuccessful Austerlitz experience; they could only survive. In this essay, we will not again list examples of the surprising resilience of Russian soldiers, but only recall what the army commander, General Bennigsen, and only some of his closest comrades, as well as the last commander of the ally Prussia, General von Lestok

General Leonty Bennigsen, who became the head of the Russian army shortly before the battle at Eylau, is difficult to attribute to the number of “forgotten” heroes. Rather, too patriotic historians have chosen not to be credited in the first row, although a lot has been written about Bennigsen, including in the pages of Military Review (https://topwar.ru/109032-general-bennigsen-kovarstvo-i-otvaga. html).

They defeated Napoleon. Part of 2. Heroes of Eylau

General Leonty Bennigsen, the first who managed to resist in an open battle against Napoleon

Coming from Hannover, the same age as Kutuzov (born in 1745), he came to the Russian service as an 28-year-old major, with little experience of participating in the Seven Years War. Bennigsen was once better known as one of the main participants in the conspiracy against Paul I. It was even believed that Alexander I did not forgive him for this, which, however, did not prevent Beningsen from giving high appointments and showering him with awards. However, the field marshal's baton Bennigsen never received, unlike Kutuzov and much less deserved Wittgenstein and Saken.

And yet he has a very decent place in the military stories Russia, and contemporaries, it seems, generally considered him one of the best generals of Russia. Even Leo Tolstoy paid attention to this in the pages of “War and Peace”: “... They said, on the contrary, that there was still no one more efficient and experienced than Bennigsen, and no matter how you turn, you will come to him. .. ”- this is just one of many judgments about the candidacy of the commander-in-chief of the Russian army in 1812.

Even before the confrontation with Napoleon, during the first Polish campaign 1792-1794, he was commended by Suvorov, who wrote that Bennigsen "discovered the qualities of a good cavalry officer - ardor, courage, speed." The general did not lose these qualities to the beginning of the 1806 company in Poland, and under Pultusk with the 40-thousandth corps he inflicted a cruel defeat on Lann’s corps, reporting it as a victory over Napoleon himself. For which he received the Order of St. George 2 degree, as well as command of the army.

However, already in the course of the operation, which in the first days of February 1807 of the year led the Russians and French to Eylau, Bennigsen managed to miss several opportunities to beat Napoleon’s marshals Ney and Bernadot in parts. The general tried with all his might to cover Königsberg, and also sought connections with the Prussian corps of Lestoc, reinforced with several Russian regiments. The Prussians tried to rely on the seaside part of East Prussia, covering Danzig, from which uninterrupted supplies from England were established.

In the days of a slow retreat to the environs of Königsberg and the Russian border, General P.I. Bagration, led by the rearguard of the army of Bennigsen, had to fight back from the superior forces of the enemy. On the night of February 8 (all dates - in a new style) Bagration managed to keep the burning Aylau behind the Russians - in fact, an excellent defensive position. However, as a result of the terrible nighttime confusion, when Commander Bennigsen, having almost no idea of ​​the case, was virtually eliminated from leading the battle, the town was abandoned.


Preussis-Eylau, morning 8 February 1807 of the year. The French and Russians are at the starting positions. Davu is on the way, Ney is on the march, and Lestok is in a hurry for help.

But perhaps, when the strongest snowstorm started the next morning, it even played into the hands of the Russians, since the artillery received an unexpected opportunity to almost shoot French columns leaving the narrow streets of Eylau. By that time, having a French report intercepted by the Cossacks, Bennigsen knew that Napoleon was planning to deliver the main blow to his left flank. To this end, the 3 Corps of Marshal Davout hastily advanced to the battlefield. At the same time, the right flank was threatened with a detour of Ney, whose parallel course to the outskirts of Eylau was being moved to the von Lestoc regiments.

Davout’s strike was preceded by the corps of Marshal Soult — on the right-wing Russian wing and Marshal Augereau — in the center. It was this corps that, due to the outbreak of a blizzard, shifted from Eylau to the right and came under the destruction of the 70-gun Russian battery. Bennigsen, whose headquarters were located near the village of Auklappen, traveled several times directly to the lines of the Russian infantry regiments, without letting go of the battle management, and this is recognized by all memoirists, up to the very critical Ermolov and Davydov.

Bennigsen gave orders to the Russian reserve commander, General Dokhturov, who led a counterattack against Murat and Bessière's cavalry, which almost broke through the Russian center. After the divisions of the Davout corps entered the battle and the entire left flank of the Russian position was practically overturned, two episodes occurred that still remain the subject of controversy for historians. Even during the annual reconstructions of the battle around present-day Bagrationovsk, disputes arise as to how to portray Bennigsen.



It was at that moment when Davout's troops captured Kuchitten and almost cut off the communications of the Russian army, Bennigsen hurried to the rear, and according to his memoirs, he met Lestok’s suitable corps. Whether Bennigsen and Lestok were met is still debatable. Somewhere in the vaults of German museums there are even pictures of this meeting, but critics of the Russian commander prefer to say that he either got lost or just ran away from the battlefield, considering the matter lost. We take for the main thing that Bennigsen returned.

Nevertheless, the old Prussian Lestoc, who was already almost 70, arrived in time, and really rushed at Davou in the front ranks of his hussars. Anton Wilhelm von Lestok, this old Prussian hussar, whose ancestors were fugitive French Huguenots, died peacefully with a 77-year-old, six months before the end of the Napoleonic wars. But still in 75 he continued to fight with Napoleon, and the famous: “a hussar, not killed in 30 years, is not a hussar, but rubbish,” that is about him.


General Anton Wilhelm von Lestok - in Russia his decent portrait is not easy to find

Recall, these words are attributed just to the French - and Marshal Lanna, and General Lassalle, and von Lestoc was just lucky. It was fortunate not to be killed in 30 years and survive as part of the regiment of Citten, who, even under Frederick the Great, was the first to be thrown into the thick of it. Lestoka was lucky to be with the Russians on the battlefield near Eylau and rightfully deserve the glory of the winner of Napoleon, more precisely, one of the winners.

But Bennigsen, returning to the bet, which had already moved to the rear of the right-flank Corps Tuchkov, had already managed to the next controversial episode. However, in this case, the role of Bennigsen is much less arguing, rather, the laurels are divided. And they divide the two much more famous, already for 1812 year, the general - Kutaisov and Ermolov.

Kutaisov turned out to be under Eylau as commander of horse artillery, with the rank of major general, although he was only 22 of the year. However, there is nothing to be surprised at, since Colonel Kutaisov’s guard managed to get already 15-year-old - thanks to the patronage of his father, the all-powerful favorite under Pavel I. another, from one battery to another. And yet, no one said and would not say that his horse companies were at the right time in the right place without the knowledge of Kutaisov. However, without the knowledge of Commander-in-Chief Bennigsen, they too could hardly be there.


General A.I. Kutaisov - the young genius of the Russian artillery who fell at Borodino

As for Yermolov, he is the 30-year-old veteran of the first Polish company 1790-ies and the Persian campaign, Suvorov’s ally who survived disgrace and arrest, could well be under Eylau in the same rank as Kutaisov-Major General. However, shortly before the second Polish company, with great difficulty, after nine years of service in one rank - a lieutenant colonel, he was finally promoted - to a colonel.

And under the command of Yermolov they gave only ... a company of horse artillery, and he simply could not help being jealous of Kutaisov. It follows from the memoirs of the future conqueror of the Caucasus that it was he who made the necessary decision and brought two more to the retreating left flank in order to “strike Davust”.



A.P.Ermolov - in the 1807 company of the year, this general had to be commanded only ... by a company of horse artillery

We will not even try to find out which of them, Kutaisov or Yermolov, promptly drove 36 guns of horse artillery under Auklappen and fought off a new onslaught of the Freean and Moran divisions. Much more important is the fact that the heroes of Eylau must be considered not only them, but Lestocq and even General Bennigsen. Let him give the order to retreat from the bloody field on which Napoleon for the first time could not win.

Field Marshal Kutuzov, who, by the way, vehemently hated Bennigsen, but tolerated him at the head of his headquarters in 1812, also ordered him to retreat from Borodino. He also ordered to leave Moscow, for which he was hated by literally everyone. For a long time, Kutuzov endured insults, not responding to accusations and slander, in order to "defeat the invincible." But for the first time such a definition applied just to Bennigsen.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 March 2019 18: 30
    Expected a more detailed analysis.
    1. +1
      29 March 2019 13: 29
      A more detailed analysis is in the two-part description of the battle itself under Preussis-Eylau and Samsonov Alexander.
      1. The decisive battle of Preussis-Eylau https://topwar.ru/108042-reshitelnoe-srazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
      2. “What courage!” As Napoleon’s army was nearly defeated at Preilische Eylau https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut-bylo-ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish- eylau.html

      And then avoided replay
  2. +15
    28 March 2019 18: 45
    In a word - a draw. No wonder Napoleon drove his army before the battle
  3. +1
    28 March 2019 19: 40
    Kutaisov, although there was a major, but a fighting guy!
    Sorry, died early.
    Bright memory to all of them!
  4. BAI
    +1
    28 March 2019 20: 02
    And which of 12 is Napoleon's defeat?
    1. 0
      29 March 2019 13: 33
      Mr. Field Marshal, or Major, I can’t understand, the series is about 12 failures ... NB. And then a draw is worse than a defeat, see the comment to the article - “What courage!” As Napoleon’s army nearly failed at Preussis-Eylau https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut-bylo -ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html

      But if you really want to - this is the second and you can list all 12, but I wanted to finish, especially since the Spanish company as a whole is still in question. Napoleon himself did not tolerate failure there
  5. +2
    28 March 2019 20: 25
    The article is interesting, but the ending is definitely blurry. It feels like an article was being written in the subway and ended under the voice of the announcer: "Caution, the doors are closing." smile
    Much too long Kutaisov with Yermolov guns were driven into positions, apparently, there was not enough time in the article to shoot properly at the French. smile
    And what happened next? Bennigsen retreated, but Napoleon what? Come on? What ended the battle, the company?
    No, you need to finish loudly and solemnly, and not as if you are afraid that you will be caught in the tail of the door. smile
    1. 0
      29 March 2019 13: 38
      Mr. Colonel, the series deals with 12 failures ... NB.

      And then a draw is worse than a defeat, see my comment on the article - “What a courage!” As Napoleon’s army was almost defeated at Preisch-Eylau https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut- bylo-ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
      In general, the company 1807, too, has already been written, the author avoids repetitions ... The task was to write about the heroes of Eylau, sorry then that they broke the story too early. Let us correct ourselves ... There will probably be an essay about Lestocq, and following the example of Engels, who wrote about Blucher, we may perhaps describe in it the course and outcome of the war as a whole. Up to the shame of Tilsit.

      But if you really want to - Préysis-Eylau is the second failure of the Bonaparte ... and it's easy to list all the 12, but I would like to finish at the finish, especially since the Spanish company as a whole is still in question. Napoleon himself did not tolerate failure there
  6. 0
    28 March 2019 20: 26
    In this case, the Russian army did not lose rather than won. As Ney said: "What a massacre and to no avail."
  7. +2
    29 March 2019 04: 07
    -Very modestly and very scanty the episode is mentioned ... when, thanks to the ensuing bad weather, the French rearguard lost its orientation and went directly under the gunfire of Russian artillery batteries ... -Before that A.A. Arakcheev managed to "make" real professionals out of Russian artillerymen .. ...
    -And then it all worked ... -the French were literally mowed down by the fire of Russian artillery ... -they suffered such monstrous losses .. that this later played a decisive role in this bloody battle ...
    -And yet ... -For some reason, a very significant fact was missed ... -Napoleon himself almost got captured by the Russian troops ... -He at the last moment managed to recapture the ripened Murat from the Cossacks ...
  8. +1
    29 March 2019 04: 29
    This battle, like Borodinskaya, is the subject of controversy among historians, especially in light of the subsequent retreat of the Russian troops. I have a feeling that already at that time the commanders had a fear of the noses that paralyzed their will, preventing them from fully realizing their talents (whatever they were). And the same Bennigsen was also struck by her. After all, defeat the French vanguards of Bennigsen, the battle of Eilau might not have happened. Subsequent battles would certainly be, but not in the right place and with the wrong quality.
    1. +1
      29 March 2019 12: 15
      At the end of the article, one phrase is missing: "To be continued."
  9. -1
    April 1 2019 10: 56
    You would be tying to write about Bonaparte. From Eilau it was possible to make such an interesting story. Murat’s one attack will pull on an adventure novel. And here - fresh, dry, mediocre. And most importantly - where is the victory over the Emperor? My friend, you yourself have chosen the name - they won. Where is the victory?
    1. 0
      April 1 2019 11: 10
      https://topwar.ru/108042-reshitelnoe-srazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
      https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut-bylo-ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
  10. 0
    April 1 2019 10: 59
    Quote: gorenina91
    . -Napoleon himself then almost fell into captivity of the Russian troops ... -He at the last moment managed to recapture the ripened Murat from the Cossacks ...

    Murat? None of the Emperor didn’t beat anyone off; he is not a stranger’s wife. The Russian infantry broke through to the headquarters, which was repelled by the guard battalion on duty under the command of General Dorsen.
    1. 0
      28 May 2019 11: 22
      https://topwar.ru/108042-reshitelnoe-srazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
      https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut-bylo-ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html

      I consider it indecent to repeat myself ...
  11. 0
    April 1 2019 14: 27
    Quote: podymych
    https://topwar.ru/108042-reshitelnoe-srazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
    https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut-bylo-ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html

    Yes. Trouble is trouble. Nothing to say, only the links are ridiculous, really bad. But above your head - buckshot is not shit! That is said there, by General Lepik. Where is the mention of this phrase? Where is the story about the massacre of Augereau? Where is the loss analysis of the parties?
    1. 0
      28 May 2019 11: 22
      https://topwar.ru/108042-reshitelnoe-srazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html
      https://topwar.ru/108124-kakaya-otvaga-kak-armiya-napoleona-chut-bylo-ne-poterpela-porazhenie-pri-preysish-eylau.html

      I consider it indecent to repeat myself ...
  12. 0
    April 5 2019 14: 48
    Dear Alexey, thanks for your material, it was interesting to read, but I will allow myself a few comments.

    certainly there was a Russian soldier. A true professional, whom since the time of Peter the Great it has been decided not only to train military affairs for a long time and hard, but also to feed, dress and shoe well, as well as provide the best weapons at that time.
    Unfortunately, these words show that the material was written according to popular books and you are clearly not familiar with the primary sources of the era. The armament of the soldiers of the army of the Russian Empire after Peter I was certainly not retarded, but it was not the best among the armies of Europe (for banal reasons of economy). This situation lasted about 150 years - from Peter I until the abolition of serfdom and the industrial revolution under Alexander II.

    About training, to put it mildly, too, not everything is so rosy. Most of the officers and quartermasters robbed soldiers in every possible way, reduced the amount of food provided, and bullets and gunpowder were not simply given out, but sold, while the exercises were carried out only by "step exercises" and imitation of bayonet attacks.

    Yes, at the beginning of a serious war (in the same Seven Years or even in the 1812 year) UNEXPECTED it suddenly became clear that soldiers in many regiments of the Russian infantry ... could not shoot! Hence, incidentally, is the addiction to close combat with bayonets and butts ...

    It is in service. As regards the uniform of a Russian soldier, the situation was even worse; even the quality of materials for a uniform with Western European armies was not worth comparing (if we talk about simple infantry regiments and not about the court guard), and it changed for the better later than the situation with weapons , - only at the very end of the 19 century or even at the beginning of the 20.

    Under the command of such generals as Rumyantsev and Suvorov, and then their students, the Russian soldier could defeat anyone.
    Which were rare exceptions in general, unfortunately, in the army of the Russian Empire, and often they purchased gunpowder and bullets, and sometimes provisions (both for people and horses) for their best military training. Here is such a reality of the XVIII century.

    Sometimes, getting into the excitement of a card game, regimental commanders even laid down fodder for the horses of their regiment - this is the case when one of the friends of the well-known gene.Kulneva during the Russian-Finnish-Swedish war of the 1808-09 of the year, just lost a lot, just put he received the forage of his hussar regiment against his last loss and part of the forage of another regiment, and won. Yes, the horses of his regiment received food as a result, but what was the fate of another hussar regiment, which remained almost without forage among the snows and frosts of Finland, the sources are silent.

    Quote: Alexey Podymov
    Kutaisov was under Eilau as a commander of horse artillery, with the rank of major general, although he was only 22 of the year. However, there is nothing to be surprised at, since the colonel Kutaisov’s guards were already 15-year-old thanks to the patronage of his father, the omnipotent favorite under Paul I. But, according to eyewitnesses, he almost had fun on the horse, plying from one flank to different, from one battery to another. And yet, no one said and will not say that his horse companies were at the right time in the right place without the knowledge of Kutaisov.
    According to eyewitnesses, many wanted to shoot this "golden Turkish boy-general" both on that terrible day and in other battles precisely for inaction. Well, under Borodino, he finally caught a random core, and as a result, in general, half of the Russian artillery remained out of the battlefield.

    Unfortunately, it is known that the initiative and courage below standing officers cannot compensate for the presence of a skilled and competent artillery commander ...