USC promises to surrender Admiral Kuznetsov to the Russian fleet in 2021

58
The only Russian aircraft carrier cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" after repair will be transferred to the Naval the fleetas planned in 2021, but a delay of three to four months is not ruled out. This was announced by the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov.

USC promises to surrender Admiral Kuznetsov to the Russian fleet in 2021




Rakhmanov explained that the repaired aircraft carrier would be handed over to the Navy in the 2021 year, as planned, but with a possible delay of three to four months, due to the docking of the ship. Now, the docking of the Admiral Kuznetsov will be carried out at the 35-m shipyard in Murmansk, where dry docks are being modernized for this.

We may go three or four months to the right. But in the 2021 year, as planned, the ship will be handed over to the fleet. The plan is that the ship repair plant number XXUMX in Murmansk will be upgraded capacity. The first part of this process is the dry docks of the plant.


- said the head of USC.

Problems with the repair of the ship arose at the end of October last year, when during the launching in Murmansk under the "Admiral Kuznetsov" because of an emergency situation the floating dock PD-50 sank. Due to the fallen crane, the takeoff deck was damaged. Total ship received 52 damage, the estimated damage amounted to 70 million rubles. However, due to the flooding of the floating dock, it was impossible to carry out the second stage of the docking of the cruiser, which could delay the repairs indefinitely.

Now, according to Rakhmanov, everything must go according to schedule. Repair of the ship is scheduled for the end of the year 2020, testing - the beginning of the year 2021. Navy cruiser transmission is the middle of the 2021 of the year.

Earlier it was reported that during the modernization of the "Admiral Kuznetsov" will receive new air defense systems, it will change the power equipment, install new boilers, a number of new pumps and new systems of landing, monitoring and control.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    19 March 2019 14: 26
    Well, he already exists ... and this is a fact ... they will repair and let the sea-oceans plow
    1. +12
      19 March 2019 14: 50
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      Well, he already exists ... and this is a fact ... they will repair and let the sea-oceans plow

      To do this, a lot of things need to be changed at Kuz, starting with air finishers and ending with boilers. Kuznetsov, so that, as you said, to plow the seas and oceans, you need a CAP REPAIR, and not picking on the lag ...
      And knowing how our sovereigns love, and locally, to cut government money, I won’t be surprised if this modernization will drag on for 5 for years. Nakhimov’s modernization is an example of this. And something tells me that during the descent of Nakhimov, whose modernization has been going on for 6 years, then criminal cases of embezzlement will come up.
      1. +9
        19 March 2019 15: 33
        You do not need to go far, only "Vostochny" was handed over, "marriages" were raised and, accordingly, criminal cases.
        1. +2
          19 March 2019 15: 44
          marriages ... criminal matters ...
          Well, there is no way without it ... this is the current Russian reality ... smoothly turning into a "good" tradition ...
      2. 0
        19 March 2019 16: 31
        Duc second "Eastern"
      3. +3
        19 March 2019 20: 26
        To do this, you need to redraw half a ship! You are right, those boilers that are now only scrapped are like aerofinishers. They have long outlived themselves. Fundamentally new ones must be set. And we have no new ones. Alas, Obukhovskoe cannot offer anything new ...
        1. 0
          20 March 2019 09: 48
          And what can be done fundamentally new in the boiler vapor except for replacing the burner?
          Nothing, essentially.
      4. +1
        20 March 2019 09: 45
        Kuznetsov and Nakhimov are two different situations.
        Kuznetsov is a running ship, but Nakhimov stood in the sediment for 15 years, plus the volume of modernization for the Nakhim, in essence, the hull and the nuclear reactor remained native, everything else will be new. At Kuznetsovo, the boilers were replaced, the valves and electricians were revised, and it is possible that some of the weapons will be replaced.
  3. -1
    19 March 2019 14: 26
    The main thing is to crow, and there at least do not dawn.
    We know why all these promises, about what "everything should go according to schedule"stand.
    1. +2
      19 March 2019 14: 32
      Unfortunately, this has become a tradition. Maybe it’s better not to publish the deadlines at all. In fact, they did it and passed it. There is no need to promise.
      1. +2
        19 March 2019 14: 55
        "ebullient activity" consists in announcing the final dates, and then even more "final"
    2. 0
      19 March 2019 14: 33
      Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
      We know why all these promises

      And nobody promises you anything. Just announced the planned dates and all.
      And if you hadn’t announced it, then you would not have written what you wrote.
      Like Pavlov’s dogs, the right word. The light came on - saliva stood out.
      1. +1
        19 March 2019 14: 43
        And nobody promises you anything. Just announced the planned dates and all.

        You are probably talking about this:
        We may go three or four months to the right. But in the 2021 year, as planned, the ship will be handed over to the fleet. The plan is that the ship repair plant number XXUMX in Murmansk will be upgraded capacity. The first part of this process is the dry docks of the plant.
        - said the head of USC.


        In this case, I correct the comment:
        The main thing is to crow, and there at least do not dawn.
        We know what all these STATEMENTS, that "everything must go on schedule" are.

        Do you agree with this?
        1. +1
          19 March 2019 14: 52
          Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
          You are probably talking about this:
          "We may go to the right for three to four months. But in 2021"

          In November last year, the year 2022 was announced as the deadline for completion of work, so if the deadlines move to the right, then nothing bad will happen because they have already moved to the left before that)))
          Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
          We know why all these STATEMENTS, that "everything must go on schedule" are worth.

          The context has not changed much.
          Man assumes, but God disposes. Moreover, the device is exclusive and made by the Forerunner civilization. smile , therefore, requires a special approach.
          1. 0
            19 March 2019 15: 26
            you are right ... the approach is different ...
            that's just any terms in ship repair at all times were illusory concepts ...
            if the result and terms are important for shipbuilding ... then the process itself is important for ship repair ...
            and in the last 50 years it has always been like this ... it’s not without reason that a proverb was born in the Navy ... the ship’s repair is impossible to finish — it can only be stopped ...
      2. 0
        19 March 2019 15: 23
        Okay, the scheduled dates. Why do we need this? This information concerns the military and shipbuilders. This is for them. It is clear that we want to take it out. But lately, so many “deadlines a la Rogozin” have been announced. it is difficult to meet, there will always be some kind of problem. It remains to wish our shipbuilders good luck and conscientious work for the good of the Motherland. hi
  4. +1
    19 March 2019 14: 30
    So maybe Lazarev for repairs and upgrades to Murmansk in modernized docks?
    1. +5
      19 March 2019 14: 56
      Well, with Kuzey, everything is clear as they say seven feet under the keel to him, but what about the PD-50? Silence... hi
      1. +1
        19 March 2019 15: 08
        Quote: Black Sniper
        But what about the PD-50?

        If there is metal fatigue, then it must be cut into needles and removed so that it does not interfere.
        After all, Dumb will use it - then suddenly it will disperse in another place.
      2. +1
        20 March 2019 05: 14
        ... PD-50 settles in underwater all marine animals ..
  5. +3
    19 March 2019 14: 30
    Strange .. this is the person who put the minus, but what is it based on? No, I don’t care how many minuses or pluses, but for this particular comment, for what?
    1. +6
      19 March 2019 14: 32
      well, the very existence of Kuzi annoys some, like for example, the very existence of Russia annoys England ...
    2. +2
      19 March 2019 14: 37
      If you're talking about my minus, then the words "well, he already exists" smacks of a superficial attitude to the issue.
      He is our only and God forbid what.
      1. -1
        19 March 2019 15: 01
        This is what kind of scent, forgive me, you need to have. So that as you put it, "smells" ... ???)))
    3. +1
      19 March 2019 14: 40
      If you are offended, put it and I’m not offended.
      1. -2
        19 March 2019 16: 35
        Quote: stalki
        If you are offended, put it and I’m not offended.

        He gave you both the pluses. You - for the fact that they confessed to him - for the fact that in retaliation did not begin to minus you.
  6. -1
    19 March 2019 14: 37
    Quote: faiver
    well, the very existence of Kuzi annoys some, like for example, the very existence of Russia annoys England ...

    And the US presence annoys me so much that everything is garlic
    1. +5
      19 March 2019 14: 49
      Speaking of the United States ... George W. Bush in a dry dock in Norfolk ...


      The ship is undergoing major repairs, which will last Until 2021 year (return to duty tentatively in the spring of 2021).



      1. +4
        19 March 2019 14: 55
        The states of such, Bush, a dozen.
      2. +4
        19 March 2019 15: 50
        Quote: Nasr
        Speaking of the United States ... George W. Bush in a dry dock in Norfolk ...
        The ship is undergoing major repairs, which will last until 2021 (return to service approximately in the spring of 2021).

        Moreover, most likely, they put Bush under repair as planned - when the time came. And not when the ship went out all the overhaul periods, limited in the intervals between cruises only to the restoration of technical readiness.
        1. 0
          19 March 2019 16: 05
          Quote: Alexey RA

          Moreover, most likely, they put the "Bush" under repair as planned - when the deadline came.

          Most likely ... it is necessary to take into account the capabilities of the United States in this matter - financial, dock, repairs without prejudice to the fleet (in the sense, there is always a valid replacement)
          Here's an example ... you can use a dock in Japan:
          Midway in the dry dock. Yokosuka, 1986.
          1. 0
            19 March 2019 19: 26
            By the way, and not bad "Midway" disguised itself - practically does not stand out against the background of roads and access roads. smile
      3. -1
        19 March 2019 20: 59
        Prefer Bush to sink
    2. 0
      19 March 2019 15: 01
      I am the United States and England, too, enrage, where do they put minus ??? Tell me ... laughing
  7. -1
    19 March 2019 14: 58
    And what is it for at all? Show flag? Very expensive. What are the practical benefits? Can you explain please. The second is not and will not be soon, if at all. Left for repairs and that's it. There is nothing else. In Thailand, it is at least a "royal yacht" sometimes, but what about us? There are much more problems with him than real sense. In my opinion, it should be permanently transferred to the category of training and to train deck pilots. "Thread" is good, but in the real sea it is completely different.
    1. 0
      19 March 2019 15: 12
      Shake the oligarchs and 3-4 such TAVKR enough!
      1. -3
        19 March 2019 15: 17
        And what are they "such" for? If we do, then a normal, full-fledged aircraft carrier. And the "oligarchs" to do with it? Again, "take everything and divide", it was already. Aircraft carriers did not appear from this.
    2. -2
      19 March 2019 15: 14
      Quote: varadero
      In my opinion, it should be permanently transferred to the category of training and to train deck pilots. "Thread" is good, but in the real sea it is completely different.

      Too expensive is the pleasure of having a ship as a training lane for pilots. Yes, and then why would deck aircraft be needed at all?
      1. 0
        19 March 2019 15: 20
        And suddenly, someday we will build a real aircraft carrier, and there are already trained crews!
    3. +3
      19 March 2019 15: 25
      Kuzya is an air defense carrier. it is needed to impart combat stability to the KUG in counteracting the enemy’s AUG. There are only fighters on it that will nullify the air strike on our ships. For barmaley it is not effective, which was proved in 2016.
      and more:
      The pair on duty in the air will timely detect the US AWACS aircraft and prevent the Super Hornets attack on our KUG. Read articles on VO comparing aircraft carriers in Russia, the United States, and Britain. It seems that the author is Timokhin ... But I will not lie. The articles describe the outfit of the American AUG forces for patrolling, strike group, cover for the strike group, tactics of use, the time of the rise of the strike group into the air, etc. It is substantiated that 12-15 Admiral Kuznetsov fighters will nullify the attack of the US AUG strike fighters. That is, the "Super-Hornets" that have broken through will no longer be able to guarantee the destruction of our KUG. Consequently - "Kuznetsov" with its air group is enough and is no longer needed. Naturally, it is hardly possible to fight off the AUG with two aircraft carriers (over 90 attack aircraft). I will add that WITHOUT an aircraft-carrying cruiser, the Northern Fleet's KUG from the US aircraft is guaranteed not to repulse.
      I quote myself, excuse me! Too lazy to write again.
      1. -2
        19 March 2019 15: 35
        And what will the Northern Fleet KUG do when the only TAVKR is under repair from 3 to 5 years? Sunbathe?
        1. 0
          19 March 2019 15: 45
          Hope for the air defense "Peter the Great", "Marshal Ustinov" and Project 22350 frigates.
  8. 0
    19 March 2019 15: 24
    Quote: varadero
    And suddenly, someday we will build a real aircraft carrier, and there are already trained crews!

    And will there be the same lane on this new ship as on Kuznetsovo? Are you kidding me?
    1. +1
      19 March 2019 17: 28
      If the new aircraft carrier is STOBAR, then +/- is similar.
      If CATOBAR - then from scratch it will be necessary to prepare only catapult service teams (Green, green-white and green-yellow vests in the American classification).
  9. +3
    19 March 2019 15: 29
    If only in 2021 the crane did not fall ...
  10. BAI
    +2
    19 March 2019 15: 39
    And about the dock is silence. Apparently - they will not raise it. Nobody wants to answer for death by negligence (or negligence?).
    1. +1
      19 March 2019 16: 52
      Quote: BAI
      And about the dock is silence. Apparently - they will not raise it. Nobody wants to answer for death by negligence (or negligence?).

      You see what the matter is, the fact is that the PD-50 legally belonged to Rosneft. In order to save, the oil company has optimized (reduced) the costs of maintaining and repairing the floating dock. This led to the fact that the diesel generators were faulty, and the workers obliged to service and repair them were reduced. Power supply became possible only from the shore. This was the main cause of the incident. Consequently, of course, Rosneft will not sue itself. The state may demand compensation from Rosneft only for damage sustained by Kuznetsov when the crane fell. Here is a situation, so to speak, typically Russian, resembling an accident at the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric power station.
  11. +1
    19 March 2019 17: 25
    Longish, but better than nothing. Personally, I want the repaired and modernized giants Nakhimov and Peter the Great more. I hope that Lazarev will be decided to return to duty. We need such monsters. Can you imagine, if the 1144 project to the eyeballs is loaded with Zircons, which monster it will be ...
    1. AAK
      -1
      19 March 2019 22: 00
      At the expense of the monster - you guessed it, your colleague ... But you just won't be able to "zircon" them to the eyeballs .... monsters will be enough just a couple of "seawulf" or "virginias" ...
  12. +1
    19 March 2019 17: 26
    Now in the comments will begin another cry of Yaroslavna
  13. -1
    19 March 2019 17: 31
    By the way, I heard that missiles are being dismantled from it (Granite seems to be), but in my opinion this is a mistake. In the World Cup, only aircraft-carrying cruisers (with their own weapons) are allowed, but not purely aircraft carriers. As far as I understand, if he loses the status of a cruiser, then he will lose the right to go to the World Cup
  14. 0
    19 March 2019 17: 32
    Quote: donavi49
    If CATOBAR - then

    That strip will be larger. All this can be worked out at NITK, and not support a whole cruiser just for the sake of the strip on the water.
  15. 0
    19 March 2019 17: 40
    Quote: Simferopol
    By the way, I heard that missiles are being dismantled from it (Granite like)

    These Granites Kuznetsov has not carried with him for a long time. And who needs this dismantling of launchers. Who will check?
  16. 0
    19 March 2019 19: 24
    It seems that everything is clear with Kuznetsov, but what about the PD-50.
    Where are the landing, effective managers?
  17. 0
    19 March 2019 19: 44
    And will the PD-50 be raised in the end, or a mustache?
  18. AAK
    -1
    19 March 2019 21: 54
    Hmmm, some kind of superficial repair, even if they do not even plan to cut out the "granite" mines and expand the hangar ... So Kuznetsov should be something like the Russian Lexington, so that there is at least something to train deck pilots on at sea. ...
    1. 0
      20 March 2019 16: 44
      But he can go into the Black Sea, but there are no Americans to aircraft carriers.
  19. 0
    20 March 2019 00: 52
    I doubt, however, that they will be in time on time.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"