NATO worried about the military power of Russia and called for the "return" of Crimea to Ukraine

102
In connection with the fifth anniversary of the reunification of the Crimea with Russia, the NATO Joint Staff released on Monday statementin which he expressed his concern about the increased military component of Russia on the peninsula and “suggested” that Crimea be returned to Ukraine.

NATO worried about the military power of Russia and called for the "return" of Crimea to Ukraine




A NATO statement said that five years ago, Russia by force annexed Crimea from Ukraine, but the alliance still considers it to be Ukrainian territory. In addition, NATO is deeply concerned about alleged violations of human rights committed by the Russian authorities against Ukrainians, Crimean Tatars, etc. These violations include: extrajudicial killings, abductions, enforced disappearances, violence, arbitrary detentions, arrests and torture.

The Alliance calls on Russia to urgently put an end to all violations, release all Ukrainian "political prisoners" and allow "international observers" to the Crimea.

We condemn the continued and large-scale buildup of Russia's military power in the Crimea and are concerned about Russia's efforts and announced plans to further strengthen military power in the Black Sea region. Russia must regain control of the peninsula of Ukraine. Crimea is the territory of Ukraine


- said in a statement.

The alliance warned that there will be no "old relations" between Russia and NATO until Moscow returns to "respect for international law and international obligations and responsibility."
102 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    18 March 2019 14: 57
    Why are these loud statements? Any sane person understands that Crimea has finally "floated away" from Ukraine.
    1. +31
      18 March 2019 15: 01
      This is a statement for the Ukrainian electorate. I think we better ignore this nonsense.
      1. +26
        18 March 2019 15: 22
        And we do not need these "old relations" between NATO and Russia. Russia will manage with Crimea even without these relations.
        1. +12
          18 March 2019 15: 28
          They are furious that at one time Crimea did not come under their subordination with the permission of Ukropia, and who wants to get acquainted with the affairs of the peninsula after reuniting with Russia and so come.
          1. +8
            18 March 2019 15: 31
            They are simply afraid to go to the Crimea through a Ukrainian checkpoint - they will rip them off as sticky there. laughing
            1. KAV
              +4
              18 March 2019 20: 09
              The alliance warned that there will be no "old relations" between Russia and NATO until Moscow returns to "respect for international law and international obligations and responsibility."
              Here I wouldn't even say "sorry, but ...". We will have such relationships that will no longer exist, and we will not get it for nothing! And thank God! Go and treat each other as much as you like, just don't meddle with us!
        2. +28
          18 March 2019 15: 59
          NATO is not a state, it is a military bloc. Enemy block. Created in order to kill us. It is with this sauce that any demands or promises should be taken.
          1. +3
            18 March 2019 23: 15
            More often it needs to be reminded! And then some do not even know this! angry soldier
          2. +4
            18 March 2019 23: 27
            Quote: Stock Officer
            NATO is not a state, it is a military bloc. Enemy block. Created in order to kill us. It is with this sauce that any demands or promises should be taken.

            Yeah! And how many times does RUSSIA have to stand against everyone? At a glance: the "turmoil" of the early 17th century and the invasion of the Poles, ended in 1612 with the victory of the militia. Everyone knows about the Swedes. About Napoleon the same way. But the "Crimean War" 1853-1856, it is also called the zero world war! All Europe is against Russia! Result? Yes, we lost this war, but the peace treaty was signed! And after that in the West for a long time the question "hung": who won this war? Then the Russian-Japanese, but this is in fact, and in fact, again all of Europe is against us, though the United States has already been added! Yes, Germany outwardly supported, but with the aim of removing the fleet from the Baltic, and they succeeded! Further WWI and World War II!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +5
        18 March 2019 15: 33
        Quote: Ramazan
        This is a statement for the Ukrainian electorate. I think we better ignore this nonsense.


        Not so many people in Ukraine are stupid to constantly believe in the tales of Pyotr Alekseevich and Co. When all this is boring.
        1. +5
          18 March 2019 15: 36
          Quote: NF68
          Quote: Ramazan
          This is a statement for the Ukrainian electorate. I think we better ignore this nonsense.

          Not so many people in Ukraine are stupid to constantly believe in the tales of Pyotr Alekseevich and Co. When all this is boring.

          But the point is not in faith, but in propaganda. Everyone does his job, for which he receives his gesheft. Believe it or not, this is the second question. I think it’s unlikely that anyone cares in NATO.
          1. 0
            19 March 2019 15: 59
            Quote: Ramazan
            Quote: NF68
            Quote: Ramazan
            This is a statement for the Ukrainian electorate. I think we better ignore this nonsense.

            Not so many people in Ukraine are stupid to constantly believe in the tales of Pyotr Alekseevich and Co. When all this is boring.

            But the point is not in faith, but in propaganda. Everyone does his job, for which he receives his gesheft. Believe it or not, this is the second question. I think it’s unlikely that anyone cares in NATO.


            This current Ukrainian propaganda is very primitive. Could have come up with something smarter. And they still demonstrate their wretchedness.
            1. 0
              20 March 2019 15: 12
              Quote: NF68
              This current Ukrainian propaganda is very primitive.

              what is the target audience, so is propaganda. they believe that they’ve been fighting Russia for 5 years.
    2. +13
      18 March 2019 15: 18
      NF68 Any sane person understands that Crimea has finally "floated away" from Ukraine.

      Crimea did not "float away" from Ukraine. negative Crimea returned to Russia. Yes
      1. +8
        18 March 2019 15: 34
        Quote: askort154
        NF68 Any sane person understands that Crimea has finally "floated away" from Ukraine.

        Crimea did not "float away" from Ukraine. negative Crimea returned to Russia. Yes


        Swam away or returned, not so important. It is important that Crimea has not belonged to Ukraine for 5 years and that there is no terrible lawlessness on the territory of Crimea that the horses did in the east of Ukraine.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +9
      18 March 2019 15: 42
      We condemn the ongoing and widespread buildup of Russia's military power in Crimea

      A NATO military bloc created against our country under the control of the United States declared. And since when has the military bloc been concerned about human rights?
    5. +14
      18 March 2019 15: 47
      NATO and human rights. Interesting squiggle.
      Military block. The bombing of Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Syria.
      Hundreds of thousands of dead people.
      1. +4
        18 March 2019 18: 33
        millions unfortunately
    6. +8
      18 March 2019 16: 21
      Quote: NF68
      Why are these loud statements? Any sane person understands that Crimea has finally "floated away" from Ukraine.

      It's just that NATO has forgotten how Kosovo was cut off from Serbia with democratic missiles and bombs, and then, under the cover of Keifor forces, they let the Kosovar Albanians burn Orthodox churches and mock the Serbian population.
    7. +5
      18 March 2019 16: 54
      admit "international observers" to Crimea.

      So come NATO’s fools, for five years when Crimea returned home, not one of yours came to see how people live there, you would see with your own eyes, hear, and then blather the imperfections, those who visited Kiima and saw with their own eyes in a flash the kids shut up their mouths.
    8. +3
      18 March 2019 18: 01
      NATO's joint headquarters on Monday issued a statement in which it expressed concern about the increased military component of Russia on the peninsula and "offered" to return Crimea to Ukraine.

      Counter offer - and NATO in return, as a gesture of "goodwill" Expels from NATO countries that were formerly members of the Warsaw Treaty bloc and countries that were former union republics of the Soviet Union!
    9. +2
      18 March 2019 19: 05
      Why are these loud statements? Any sane person understands that Crimea has finally "floated away" from Ukraine.
      In the 50s-60s, to any sane person, it was clear that the USSR was the top of the perfection of mankind! You think very narrowly. GDP is not eternal. Just like everyone else. Common sense and other foundations of humanity are not connected with ideology in any way. Just open your eyes! GDP, in power is all that or what ... But how people began to think and what contradictions in society! And what will happen if some kind of Navalny comes (oh horror)? Yes, in 20 years! But, fortunately, you, among other things, most likely will not know about it .. Just like those who fought for the country in 41-45, they don’t know how their merits are used (literally in the worst sense of the word ) all and sundry!
    10. +2
      18 March 2019 20: 56
      Here, the ancient Ukrainians dig a canal along the Perekop Isthmus - then it will definitely come off the mainland and sail.
  2. +12
    18 March 2019 14: 58
    I liked the phrase - and allow "international observers" to enter Crimea. and who forbids them to enter ??
    1. +11
      18 March 2019 15: 16
      And I liked the expression "there will be no previous relationship"! This begs the question of what kind of previous ones? And what needs to be done for this, to surrender positions like a marked patch?
      1. +3
        18 March 2019 17: 55
        Quote: Hagalaz
        The question is what are the former?

        hi
        The former (before the Crimean events) relations between the Russian Federation and NATO were extremely bad, but now they are "out of hand." That is, having surrendered Crimea, we must return to extremely bad relations with the alliance, So why the hell do we need to surrender our land to the enemy, so that he does not attack us with a flail, but with an oryasin? fool bully
  3. +18
    18 March 2019 14: 58
    wow statement!
  4. +8
    18 March 2019 14: 59
    Marvelous, wonderful, wonderful miracle! They are worried, again ...
    Yes pah on you. Profukali deep-sea port at our borders, so do not physdipite.

    And Crimean happy holiday!
  5. +12
    18 March 2019 14: 59
    Crimea is the territory of Ukraine
    Well then, Kosovo is the territory of Serbia
    1. +6
      18 March 2019 15: 08
      Quote: svp67
      Crimea is the territory of Ukraine
      Well then, Kosovo is the territory of Serbia

      And Alaska is the territory of Russia.
      1. +4
        18 March 2019 15: 20
        Quote: Irokez
        And Alaska is the territory of Russia.

        Note, this topic is "taboo"
      2. +4
        18 March 2019 15: 52
        Quote: Irokez
        And Alaska is the territory of Russia.

        Gibraltar - Spain, Malvins - Argentina, Mayotte - Comoros, Texas - Mexico
      3. +2
        18 March 2019 18: 13
        Quote: Irokez
        And Alaska is the territory of Russia.

        hi
        Well, it's unlikely - the train left. By the way, the Alaskan "rulers" submitted an application to the US Senate that America should revise the treaty on the delimitation of zones of influence in the TO in order to annex part of the Russian Commander Islands to the US. How. fool
      4. +2
        18 March 2019 19: 26
        No, we, unfortunately, have sold Alaska and cannot apply for it. But they bought a part of the Baltic states.
    2. +2
      18 March 2019 18: 03
      Quote: svp67
      Well then, Kosovo is the territory of Serbia

      hi , Sergei.
      Speaking of Serbia, or rather about its President Vucic. Who is he - Alexander Vucic? While in Moscow, he bleated that the Serbs would never forgive the alliance for the bombing and death of thousands of its compatriots, and suddenly:
      1. +3
        18 March 2019 18: 09
        Welcome hi
        Quote: Lelek
        Who is he - Alexander Vuchich?

        And they noticed that they started a "Maidan" there, is it not clear who did it? So apparently decided to "dodge"
        1. +4
          18 March 2019 18: 17
          Quote: svp67
          So apparently decided to "dodge"


          Apparently so. We have no luck with "hetmans - two-faced Januses". "Castro, Che Guevars, Allendes" were translated.
  6. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 01
    The alliance warned that there would be no "old relationship" between Russia and NATO,
    Russia was upset, but continued to build a bridge, thermal power plants and roads, covering them regularly with new S-400s, along with other Bastions ... smile
  7. +2
    18 March 2019 15: 03
    Alliance calls on Russia to urgently put an end to all violations, release all Ukrainian "political prisoners" and allow "international observers" to enter Crimea.

    Is calling? Blows pipes and hits drums? If they ask to put an end to it - let’s put it, don’t hesitate! And we will give out the files so that the flies and strikers can be grinded. By the way, soap and ropes will bring your own from home ... laughing laughing lol
  8. -2
    18 March 2019 15: 06
    If Russophobes were not class-close to the Bandera Nazis in the Russian high-level cabinet of power, then they would have put things in order and shut up NATO. But so far only concerns express that they say it’s uncomfortable to sleep on the ceiling. An ostrich position, which has already been driven to the ceiling and continues to be entertained above it. But the reason is simple - not stolen in Russia, but from sworn friends, away from the eyes of their own citizens. Therefore, it is so uncomfortable to sleep on the ceiling.
    1. +4
      18 March 2019 15: 25
      Quote: Mayor_Vikhr
      If Russophobes were not class-close to the Bandera Nazis in the Russian high-level cabinet of power, then they would have put things in order and shut up NATO. But so far only concerns express that they say it’s uncomfortable to sleep on the ceiling.

      So whose Crimea?
      If only concerns were expressed, who would he be?
      And so yes. This is your class-close Khrushchev gave the Crimea of ​​the Ukrainian SSR. And then even more class-close Gorbachev sold all this.
      Now we have to puff class-alien, return Crimea back.
      1. +2
        18 March 2019 15: 43
        Quote: Mestny
        So whose Crimea?
        If only concerns were expressed, who would he be?

        Block the Crimea from Bandera in 2014 - this is just 2 roads by and large to block. The population in Crimea is 99% pro-Russian. But what about the rest of the Bolsheviks' gifts to the Galician fascists and the thief oligarchs from Dnepropetrovsk? Trotsky banged under Stalin. And his work still lives on.
    2. +2
      18 March 2019 15: 37
      So NATO was worried, and not we, someone you are blaming from a sore head to a healthy one.
  9. +5
    18 March 2019 15: 07
    Who is talking about international law? London ignores the decision of the UN International Court of Justice to return the Chagos archipelago to Mauritius - there is an American-British military base there. US Senator Lindsay Graham believes the Golan annexed by Israel should be recognized as its integral territory. Not to mention the bombing of Syria, allegedly due to chemical attacks and shameless interference in Venezuela. First, let them give up their favorite double standards.
    1. +2
      18 March 2019 15: 43
      The fact is that they (the West) consider themselves only monopoly stewards, experts and copyright holders of the so-called "international law"
      Now it’s not customary for them to prove anything to anyone, “indictment law” is applied, naturally, someone else will always be guilty of them (Russia, China, etc.), with whom they argue, who does not obey them and is guilty and violates international law, but neon is in fact, therefore, it makes no sense to prove something, it’s also just counter-blaming and that’s all
  10. +1
    18 March 2019 15: 11
    These violations include extrajudicial killings, abductions, enforced disappearances, violence, arbitrary detention, arrests and torture

    In my opinion they are talking about the SBU ....
    1. +4
      18 March 2019 15: 14
      Kiev has already detained 36 Crimeans on charges of high treason and the like, and still wants to get hold of the captain of the ship "Nord" Gorbenko, who has returned home - he was still lucky to escape. But the terrorist Sentsov, who wanted to blow up the Lenin monument in order to "scare the Muscovites", is a "political prisoner" for the West.
      1. -1
        18 March 2019 22: 04
        Quote: Serjio
        the captain of the ship "Nord" Gorbenko, who returned home - he was still lucky to escape

        he was already released. He was quietly moving where he wanted, such a situation in the Russian Federation would not have been allowed
  11. +2
    18 March 2019 15: 12
    today is the day of idiotic statements and decisions or what?))) then sanctions then gunpowder burns now these are going crazy)))
  12. +5
    18 March 2019 15: 14
    Notably their nerds are torn, Crimea sailed away forever, but I wanted to open a base there, pichalka!
    In response, Russia should urge NATO to return Yugoslavia to its former borders.
    1. +1
      18 March 2019 15: 29
      There, to see the plans were key, connected specifically with the Crimea.
      Because the hysteria of them began then, and continues and only grows.
  13. +6
    18 March 2019 15: 14
    From the donkey Ears them, and not CRIMEA !!!
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 15
    I am concerned about the fate of 33 warriors and squirrels that the emeralds are getting through excessive hard labor on the occupied island of Buyan. Our Rugen!
  16. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 21
    A HUHU is not GOOD?
  17. +8
    18 March 2019 15: 23
    And also:
    Kosovo - Serbia,
    Texas - Mexico,
    Transcarpathia - Hungary,
    America to the Indians
    Northern Ireland - Ireland ...
  18. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 28
    NATO seems to like erotic walking
  19. +3
    18 March 2019 15: 28
    NATO's joint headquarters on Monday issued a statement in which it expressed concern about the increased military component of Russia on the peninsula and "offered" to return Crimea to Ukraine.

    We can give you a snout, both of them. Yes laughing
    How easy it is to declare "return" knowing that for this they will not be impaled and hanged. angry
    Return Alaska to us, and your territory to the Indians, so it will be more honest. Yes
  20. +3
    18 March 2019 15: 33
    Well, no words. They themselves are not tired, or the striped hegemon forces.
    1. Cry
      +2
      18 March 2019 15: 47
      The hegemon is looking for who will be the first to slaughter: It is better for him if there is a larger set for bullying a bear.
  21. +7
    18 March 2019 15: 36
    Right now, we can’t sleep and we can’t, as we want the previous relations with NATO laughing . Well, they can’t accept in any way that people themselves decided to leave, and most of all it infuriates them that no one began to fight. Hence the continuous tales about the Crimea and the human rights that they allegedly violate there. Erase the wretched. tongue All Happy Holidays, the Day of the Reunion of Crimea and Russia. hi
  22. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 40
    Russia must regain control of the peninsula of Ukraine. Crimea is the territory of Ukraine

    And the opinion of residents of the Crimea do not care?
  23. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 40
    I hope they (NATO) have already been sent ... by the forest? At such moments, you recall Lavrov and his famous phrase .....
  24. Cry
    +2
    18 March 2019 15: 43
    Who is NATO? - This is the enemy (a threat that does not change the essence of Aglitsky) of Russia. This is stated in the US military doctrine, and the USA is the Shining Hill of NATO, but the rest are banderlogs designed for cannon fodder. So the enemy sets an ultimatum and prepares the ground for the invasion.
  25. +3
    18 March 2019 15: 44
    but the alliance still considers it to be Ukrainian territory.

    Well then, try to do the exercises there! Ukrainians allow you to conduct exercises on their territory?
    The alliance warned that there would be no "previous relationship" between Russia and NATO until Moscow returns to "compliance with international law and international obligations and responsibilities."

    I didn’t really want to! Just let's end with the NATO transport corridor to Afghanistan through Russia ?!
    Russia must regain control of the peninsula of Ukraine.

    Not before mattresses return the lands to the Indians of North America and the Mexicans!
    Well, then we too!
    1. +2
      18 March 2019 19: 11
      "I didn't really want to! Just let's finish with the NATO transport corridor to Afghanistan via Russia ?!" Yes, it seems that the corridor has been closed for a long time. Maybe, of course, I'm wrong.
  26. +5
    18 March 2019 15: 44
    The alliance warned that there will be no "old relations" between Russia and NATO until Moscow returns to "respect for international law and international obligations and responsibility."
    -----------------------
    Have you had a relationship? Maybe they also promised to get married? laughing laughing
  27. +4
    18 March 2019 15: 45
    "...A widespread NATO statement says that five years ago, Russia annexed Crimea to Ukraine by force, but the alliance still considers it Ukrainian territory..."
    ======
    My God, what a "lovely" !!! This is WITHOUT a single shot, having at least THREE TIMES less military contingent - and so immediately "TAKE OUT" fool
    "...The Alliance calls on Russia to urgently put an end to all violations, release all Ukrainian "political prisoners" and admit "international observers" to Crimea..."
    ========
    Aha! Uh-uh-uh-uh! So they ran to return "to the bosom of the" Square "" (which has long been "stale" "!!!) Just put on slippers ....
    Better to wait until "Ukraine" joins Crimea! Even the name seems to have been thought up: "Northern Tavria"! bully
    Hello!!!
  28. +1
    18 March 2019 15: 58
    Yes, they would not have gone gay NATO to catch a butterfly farm!
    It begins, they will soon be threatening with missiles, it is not in vain that Europe has created a powerful grouping, there will soon be a real mess, summer is not winter, so we are waiting and it doesn’t matter what the weather is!
  29. +4
    18 March 2019 16: 00
    Well, you can’t be such truncheons. Russia is in line for the age of land after the United States (return of land to the Indians, England, Mexico, Russia ...), England, France, Spain ... Let NATO rush first ahead, and then it turns to us.
  30. +3
    18 March 2019 16: 32
    NATO, by definition, is a bloc whose activities are limited to NATO countries. Ukraine is not a member of them, so NATO’s statements on Crimea are a reason to laugh, and no more
  31. +5
    18 March 2019 16: 35
    We offer to return Alaska. So far so good
  32. +1
    18 March 2019 16: 36
    We condemn the ongoing and large-scale buildup of NATO military power in the Black Sea and are concerned about the efforts and stated plans of the United States to further strengthen military power in the Black Sea region. NATO countries and the United States must regain control of Ukraine to the people of this country and the newly elected Ukrainian government of national unity. NATO is an organization fomenting war, and it has no place in a civilized human society of the 21st century!
  33. +2
    18 March 2019 16: 49
    After the return of the integrity of bombed Yugoslavia
  34. 0
    18 March 2019 17: 04
    Russia must regain control of the peninsula of Ukraine. Crimea is the territory of Ukraine


    from: Government of the Russian Federation
    to: NATO

    LETTER

    INNA .....
  35. +1
    18 March 2019 17: 04
    These violations include extrajudicial killings, abductions, enforced disappearances, violence, arbitrary detention, arrests and torture.

    Let them name the "victims"! Or were they themselves witnesses ?!
    If they are so preoccupied with "violations," then let them answer for Guantanamo first!
  36. 0
    18 March 2019 17: 07
    From another parallel reality called Euro (Alliance, Parliament, Union), we hear voices about some kind of democracy. Do I need to respond to them? I really want to send back, like Tau-Kityan, but I have to comply with the orderly muzzle.
    1. 0
      18 March 2019 17: 52
      And where does the "decorous muzzle"? You send them where they constantly go laughing
  37. +5
    18 March 2019 17: 33
    Here are the hypocritical fools. But their uncontrollable hysteria sounds nice, twitched))
    From a dead donkey ears, a banana, not the Crimea.
  38. +2
    18 March 2019 17: 51
    The alliance warned that there would be no "old relationship" between Russia and NATO

    God grant that they were no longer!
  39. 0
    18 March 2019 17: 56
    Yes, yes, return, and always with all the new weapons in addition. And the population should be taken to Russia, they have no place in a democratic Ukraine!
  40. +1
    18 March 2019 17: 57
    return Kosovo to Serbia!
  41. 0
    18 March 2019 18: 22
    Well, have you lost your temper like an old nag, Ms Europe? Only figures and facts are objective, and fairy tales are you for your children at night. For some time now, only miserable people have bought your crap. As for the Crimea, do not scam as an institute. From sweet everything happens ...
  42. +1
    18 March 2019 18: 24
    But isn’t it for all of NATO to take a coordinated militant step towards the symbol of masculinity?
  43. +1
    18 March 2019 18: 29
    In NATO, as they say, in order to reassure the Ukrainians. But everyone knows that our Crimea, the Russian, and no one can and will not dare to take it.
  44. +1
    18 March 2019 18: 29
    as in childhood remember: Take away laughing
  45. +1
    18 March 2019 18: 30
    The referendum in Crimea and its result is an act of international law.
    1. +2
      18 March 2019 20: 43
      They are afraid of this, because they themselves violated everything - Kosovo and so on ...
  46. 0
    18 March 2019 18: 35
    Dear Colleagues. hi These statements, the usual informational preparation for the possible launch of real action. Not necessarily "partners" themselves under the tanks, there are Bandera, there is in Wed. Asian ISIS. In Russia there is a "successful" Government, there is just the 5th column, there are "guests" from 12-20 mln. I propose to look at the information of the RF Border Services, the results of entry-exit data. All options have long been described, rehearsed. The question is, where to start! No.
    Well, don't you think that "potential partners" who have invested so much in NATO are idiots, and so many things are being transferred to the borders of the Russian Federation.
    Investments in "NezalEzhnoy", especially since there are elections, and the best option to be "re-elected" without elections is ... Right!
    ISIS including to transfer ISIS fighters with experience to Afghanistan with their concentration on the border with the CIS.
    In our 5th column, that would have money for development and preparation - NO MONEY!
    А also in the mass delivery of guests, which may well be in place and in time. Let's remember Gaddafi in the middle of the war in Libya said that the so-called. "Rebels" are not Libyans, but visiting "migrant workers" are mostly young, trained and knowing why. Citizens lived, to put it mildly, very good. well.
    Almost Kosovo option only there they imported Albanians to help raise the edge. RAISED!
    T.ch. it is an inform war, informational preparation of the world for the justification of all possible options.
    It’s a pity that ours seems to have said something about Japan and its Russian debts. And the rest is just concern.
    Remind debts and contrast Yes :
    USA - Mexico - captured state of Texas. Where is the money for Alaska:
    Ukraine - that they legally abandoned everything that happened with the Pereyaslavka Rada. This means that it is within the boundaries of what has entered Russia (RI). And everything from the tsars and the secretaries-general is OUR - RUSSIA.
    And the same Poland, Romania, Hungary, there is something to ask from "NezalEzhna". Since they refused from Russia (RI, USSR). YOURSELF!
    Poland - we are the territory of Germany with access to the sea, as we surrendered to an ally. And since Russia was not a liberator, but an invader to bill for our 600 thousand dead. And the land of Germany from the invaders received back.
    Balts it is, in addition to part of Lithuania, the property of Russia in general (the Nishtat Peace and the transfer agreement, including paid for by Sweden - the mistress of their servants).
    It is necessary somehow, more professionally with them THEIR inform to conduct a war. feel
    И to prepare, what - is there in our mobility reserve from enterprises to the military, in civil defense, in the training of draftees? Not difficult years of stagnation, much in ... hi
  47. +1
    18 March 2019 18: 47
    achressors, what what
  48. +1
    18 March 2019 19: 18
    "Concerned"? It's good! But then, of course, "they are stupid!" rushing with might and main! To declare that according to the words of Ukraine in Crimea "everything is bad" and never come, look at reality for yourself, is the height of idiocy! They are really STUPID! :) And those who come and talk about the real situation are simply ignored! Well, in that case, Russia just needs to ignore the tyrants from NATO! My wife has all relatives - the Crimean Tatars, and they are personally pleased with the change in the Ukrainian devastation to more or less tangible interventions by Russia. Yes, not everyone is happy: many are accustomed to driving without a license, breaking the rules and laws, they are accustomed, in general, to the inaction of the Ukrainian system and authorities, but those who understand that order and laws are needed are quite happy with the changes.
  49. +3
    18 March 2019 19: 21
    There will be no previous relations until NATO returns to its former borders.
    1. +2
      18 March 2019 20: 42
      So, we must meet these requirements to meet them ...
  50. 0
    18 March 2019 19: 34
    Quote: Lexa-149
    These violations include extrajudicial killings, abductions, enforced disappearances, violence, arbitrary detention, arrests and torture.

    Let them name the "victims"! Or were they themselves witnesses ?!
    If they are so preoccupied with "violations," then let them answer for Guantanamo first!

    They themselves do not know where this Crimea is located! They do not come to the "victims of atrocities", and whoever comes and sees everything for himself is ignored, or even fired! Everything from the words "honest Ukrainian!" So you should treat them as very dumb, mentally retarded, but rather insane people! :)
  51. +1
    18 March 2019 19: 52
    Only what is done on the bayonets of NATO members can be considered a democratic choice. Everything else is tyranny and annexation.
  52. +1
    18 March 2019 20: 41
    The alliance warned that there will be no “previous relations” between Russia and NATO until Moscow returns to “compliance with international law and international obligations and responsibilities.”


    So walk through the forest.
  53. +1
    18 March 2019 20: 57
    Crimea has already been returned, it remains to discuss other regions of Ukraine.)
  54. +1
    18 March 2019 21: 29
    Naive ... bully
  55. 0
    18 March 2019 22: 37
    Is your heart beating, is your chest bursting?
    Drink while you drink, forget everything!
  56. 0
    18 March 2019 23: 58
    Yeah, we’ll give it all up in a minute and return it, and then we’ll catch up and give Siberia as a gift laughing
  57. 0
    19 March 2019 05: 56
    There is no way they can survive this, such a base is gone.
  58. +1
    20 March 2019 11: 36
    We propose that the pen-do-hegemon immediately return Texas to Mexico and all the lands to the Indians.
  59. 0
    20 March 2019 11: 44
    Of course, as some Western experts correctly point out, the issue of Crimea should have been resolved in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, but Yeltsin did not need it and therefore the issue of return dragged on for many years. The West has lost and now there is nothing left to do but make statements in the spirit of North Atlantic solidarity; the next stage should be the liberation of all of Ukraine from US occupation and an end to the armed conflict in Donbass.