US “strengthens” Ukrainian fleet with two more decommissioned boats

56
In light of the incident in the Kerch Strait, the United States will continue to support Ukraine and will continue to provide military assistance to Kiev to confront Russia in the waters of the Azov and Black Seas. In this case, the main will be the delivery of two more decommissioned patrol boats. This was stated by the Commander-in-Chief of the United Armed Forces (OVS) of NATO in Europe, American General Curtis Scaparotti, reports TASS.

US “strengthens” Ukrainian fleet with two more decommissioned boats




Speaking to the US Congress, he confirmed that the Pentagon plans to supply sniper to Ukraine in the future weapon, ammunition and marine systems. Also, according to him, the United States will continue to strengthen the Naval forces of Ukraine, supplying them with various equipment, but the main supply will be the transfer of two more decommissioned Island class patrol boats to replenish the composition fleet and confront Russian ships. At the same time, Scaparotti did not specify when exactly the United States would transfer boats to Ukraine. In addition, the United States will increase funding for some assistance programs to Kiev.

The United States has previously transferred two Island-class patrol boats to Ukraine. The ceremonial signing of the agreement, which was attended by President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, was held in Baltimore at the end of September last year. Boats are still in the US, in Ukraine they say that they will be introduced into the Navy of Ukraine this fall. In this case, before the transfer from the boats removed all weapons. Kiev pays for the modernization and repair of boats, their transportation to Odessa and personnel training.

The Ukrainian Navy said that after arriving in Odessa, they would supply weapons to boats and ship them to the Sea of ​​Azov to "confront Russian aggression."
  • USNavy
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    14 March 2019 15: 40
    Need to expand the parking lot in Kerch? Or wait ....
    1. +10
      14 March 2019 15: 47
      Wow, damn it! How many Crimean naval scrap metal they have left. We give it to them for nothing. So no, they drive the same thing from the USA, and even grandmas pay for it. fool
      1. +7
        14 March 2019 15: 51
        To what all the same humiliation the dill has sunk, they vparivayut trash written off and they are happy. As loudly said "they will resist the Russian warships", laughter and nothing more.
        1. +5
          14 March 2019 16: 07
          The skakuasas had problems with these toys :: Petro Lekseich threatened everyone that his enterprises would not put slingshots to these boats, since other weapons were already removed from these boats :: in addition, his team had disagreements about the caliber of the stones to be shot these slingshots (they say that they are intercontinental !!!) - I do not have enough education to capture the meaning of this power! laughing
        2. +4
          14 March 2019 16: 07
          Vtorsyrchermet, that’s the correct name for the Ukrainian fleet.
        3. +2
          14 March 2019 20: 17
          Quote: Spartanez300
          As loudly said "they will resist the Russian warships", laughter and nothing more.

          hi
          It's not funny, because the "exceptional" will not be limited to two old boxes to help the Nazi Ruin. After the withdrawal from the INF Treaty, calls are increasingly heard in Washington for the deployment of lethal American weapons (anti-ship missiles and the notorious medium-range missiles) on the territory of the Ruins, and this is no longer funny and requires an increased attitude from the Russian Federation.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      14 March 2019 16: 01
      oh and generous you, Cyril ... not counts ... if anything, the prisoners may hang out on barrels ...
  2. +1
    14 March 2019 15: 42
    Well, I still have American boats handed over to Ukraine to moor in the Crimea, and why such a collection, if of course they even reach the destination.
    Immediately I remembered the movie 'destination'
  3. +7
    14 March 2019 15: 43
    the main delivery will be the transfer of two more decommissioned Island class patrol boats

    All the stuff Khokhlam. lol
    1. +6
      14 March 2019 15: 52
      It is possible that the boat is still quite nothing. Especially by the standards of Khokhlyat. But they must also be kept. You can’t fill the oil later and do not delay it, well, yes, the second-hand one will require any repair.
      1. +4
        14 March 2019 15: 57
        Quote: Hagalaz
        But they must also be kept. You can’t fill the oil later and do not delay it, well, yes, the second-hand one will require any repair.

        Oil is not anyhow, fuel, too, rare parts, expensive. It’s expensive to keep junk in order. And besides, these are boats by the shore of the guard, not the Navy.bully
        1. +1
          14 March 2019 20: 21
          Quote: Evdokim
          Oil is not anyhow, fuel, too, rare parts, expensive. Expensive is a pleasure junk in order to contain

          So they are being forced into this stuff to complete a one-time task - to commit another provocation. And then everything will be as usual ..... "give Bandera for the sake of"
    2. +2
      14 March 2019 15: 56
      Not only that, trash, but also for the money. Repair, then you have to pay.
  4. -5
    14 March 2019 15: 47
    if in Kiev they bring the RCC to their minds, the candidates for installation are quite imagined.
    1. +3
      14 March 2019 16: 09
      for sure. here’s a weld from the channel and the launcher)
      1. -4
        14 March 2019 16: 11
        launchers are now all containerized; there is no big problem to fasten if there is space and displacement allows.
        Launch preparation equipment is oversized and not complicated
        1. +3
          14 March 2019 16: 11
          and they got launch containers?))))
          1. -3
            14 March 2019 16: 18
            in the video they started out of the pipe.
            But are there other PKR?
            1. +1
              14 March 2019 16: 22
              in this matter, that’s the essence) x 35 from my uranium jumped out on ships and does it have them?)
              or will they cut them off from missile boats?)
              1. -2
                14 March 2019 16: 26
                why did they let them in tests.
                maybe cut down.
                launcher is still easier than creating a rocket
                1. +1
                  14 March 2019 16: 30
                  Well, let's see what they rivet there) is most curious. it’s possible to remake an old rocket, but something from scratch, like a container, you can hardly believe in something. if they had already added them somewhere. were coastal complexes in Ukraine? I don’t remember nude at all.
                  1. +2
                    14 March 2019 17: 31
                    Quote: Bull Terrier
                    were coastal complexes in Ukraine?

                    Before the collapse of the Union, in Ukraine there was everything in huge quantities. The question is, is it now? And if it remains, then in what condition? I doubt that it is operational. In addition, no one was engaged in the full training of military personnel capable of correctly using and maintaining such systems. Specialists with more Soviet training left, and new ones, as it were not.
                    1. +1
                      14 March 2019 18: 07
                      Well, of course. it’s just curious and true how they want to launch RCC. Well, I do not believe that they themselves have already done the launcher. somehow it does not fit with the fact that they are releasing for the fleet. if we could have done this pepelats would have shown. for the same wheeled self-propelled guns they blinded from everything in a row and boast.
    2. +3
      14 March 2019 16: 12
      Quote: Avior
      if in Kiev they bring the RCC to their minds, the candidates for installation are quite imagined.

      RCC on a 110-foot boat with a displacement of less than 200 tons? Except as side boosters ...
      The maximum that you can put on it is some kind of overcooled ATGM (like the Hellfire modification that they wanted to stick on the LCS).
      1. -2
        14 March 2019 16: 19
        RCC are different. Uranium is about 200 kg.
        1. +2
          14 March 2019 17: 39
          Quote: Avior
          RCC are different. Uranium is about 200 kg.

          Is the Uranium anti-ship missile system the X-35 Harpoon? So there only one rocket weighs 620 kg.
          Plus TPK and PU. Plus a set of equipment. Plus reinforcements under the deck at the installation site at least PU.
          And now, after installing the anti-ship missile system on "Island", we get a nice object for diving. smile
        2. +1
          14 March 2019 17: 49
          Uranium is an anti-ship missile system, which includes the X-35 missile. If you are talking about her, then there is a starting weight of about 650 kg, as far as I remember. Where did you get that 200?
  5. -1
    14 March 2019 15: 48
    That’s it, I’m dumping from Russia.
  6. +1
    14 March 2019 15: 52
    Thunderstorm of the Navy laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    14 March 2019 15: 53
    The United States had previously handed over two decommissioned Island class patrol boats to Ukraine.

    Do they have semi-island boats? Ukraine would have liked ...
  8. 0
    14 March 2019 15: 55
    So the previous ones have not yet sailed. Or sailed?
  9. +3
    14 March 2019 15: 58
    Amerikosy thought out! They give dill a loan for the purchase of weapons and military equipment and impart to them the same junk and illiquid assets! And no need to bother with recycling laughing In a word Business and nothing personal!
  10. 0
    14 March 2019 16: 10
    Also, the price tag will be inflated for decommissioned boats. All that is not rubbish, everything is sold there, and Kiev is happy about it.
  11. +4
    14 March 2019 16: 13
    It seems that the Americans have solved the problem with the cost of recycling marine vehicles. Ukraine helped solve the problem.
    All the same, Trump, no matter what, is an intelligent businessman. Bravo! Elegant solution.
    1. +2
      14 March 2019 17: 24
      Quote: Nick
      Americans solved the problem with the cost of recycling marine vehicles

      Just wondering how much it costs to cut such a boat for scrap? Not at all 10 million dollars
      1. +1
        14 March 2019 17: 26
        Quote: orionvitt
        Just wondering how much it costs to cut such a boat for scrap? Not at all 10 million dollars

        And why cut, they themselves will drown, somewhere near the Kerch bridge. winked
  12. +1
    14 March 2019 16: 26
    No, that won’t work! Why are we supposed to protect this junk !? Let's take something fresher, then you can collect the marine unit from these trophies.
  13. +2
    14 March 2019 16: 34
    Well, the boats are not written off, but mothballed, and this is like 2 big differences
  14. +1
    14 March 2019 16: 54
    More than 30 patrol boats of the Island class are still on guard at the US Coast Guard today.
    Ukraine does not have ships of a similar class and will not have their own production in the near future.
    1. +2
      14 March 2019 17: 20
      Quote: alta
      30 Island class patrol boats are on guard at the US Coast Guard today

      Coast Guard, this is not the Navy, it has different tasks. To catch a poacher, to drive small drug dealers, to catch illegal migrants. Ships of this class are not adapted for a full-fledged confrontation, even with a small guard, or a missile boat. Will be sunk in the second second of the battle.
      1. 0
        14 March 2019 22: 53
        Quote: orionvitt
        Ships of this class are not adapted for a full-fledged confrontation, even with a small guard, or a missile boat. Will be sunk in the second second of the battle.

        do they take them for battle?
        No, it’s just for these purposes that they performed the same functions in the USA in Ukraine.
        The fleet will not go bankrupt (new large ships) prefer to invest in missiles. Well, the little things.
        As for large ships, they will also refuse (Ukrainians themselves, as in the case of the Hornets), there is no way to service them. The World Cup pool is fairly well shot.
        1. +1
          14 March 2019 22: 58
          Quote: Antares
          do they take them for battle?

          If there is nothing else. In Ukraine, they are going to sink the Russian fleet from their inflatable boats. Proudly calling it the "mosquito fleet". And in general, the topic of any "development" in Ukraine of anything at all (except for corruption in the government and poverty among the people) is simply absurd in its essence. The complete degradation of everything, and in a geometric progression.
    2. -2
      14 March 2019 23: 03
      Ukraine does not have ships of a similar class

      There is. In the marine conservation. And even an excess amount.
  15. +2
    14 March 2019 16: 57
    judging by the fact that the previous vessels were never delivered, it will be a fleet in exile
    1. +2
      14 March 2019 18: 22
      This will be the naval base of Ukraine in the United States.
  16. +2
    14 March 2019 17: 03
    The boats are still located in the USA, in Ukraine they declare that they will be included in the Navy in the autumn of this year. At the same time, all weapons were removed from the boats before being transferred.

    Reminds of a bawdy anecdote ... "What, scary? - Oh, scary! The first time I will fuck so scary"!
  17. +2
    14 March 2019 17: 14
    If most of the "Ukrainian fleet" will be idle in the US, well, it will only benefit the world.
  18. +1
    14 March 2019 17: 22
    Quote: BerBer
    Not only that, trash, but also for the money. Repair, then you have to pay.

    According to official information, island-class boats have a displacement of 169 tons, a cruising range of 3300 nautical miles (more than 6100 kilometers), a maximum speed of 29,5 knots (almost 55 kilometers per hour), and autonomy for 5 days.
    Crew - 16 people (2 officers and 14 sailors and foremen).
    Armament - an automatic gun of 25 mm caliber and two machine guns of 12,7 mm caliber. Boats have a motor boat for inspection, landing and rescue operations.

    Compare these boats, which still serve in the USA today, with Russian ...
    1. 0
      15 March 2019 09: 48
      Which Russian? And by what parameters? Full analogues, yes, and really not. But our tasks are different.
  19. +1
    14 March 2019 18: 57
    ... the main [help] will be the delivery of two more decommissioned patrol boats.

    Eh, walk the flaw!
  20. 0
    14 March 2019 19: 09
    It’s purely for myself that I’m stupidly neighing: how can the decommissioned boats of the US Coast Guard, designed to drive away the fragile boats of Cuban emigrants, can somehow affect the potential of interaction between the Ukrainian Navy (God forgive me!) And the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy?
  21. 0
    14 March 2019 19: 17
    That's because the Yankee presses are talking about 2 more lousy katerishki with such a pomp as whether they give a pair of AB laughing
  22. 0
    14 March 2019 19: 50
    How will this metellol from the USA affect the Ukrainian Navy?
  23. 0
    14 March 2019 20: 08
    This is an occasion to make two more capras to the admirals.
  24. 0
    14 March 2019 21: 20
    There is no sense in transferring anything else to present-day Ukraine. Or quietly drink or ditch.
  25. 0
    14 March 2019 22: 32
    Well, well, they put their sniper rifles there. How many? 500? 1000? on the scale of the war it does not matter what.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"