Military Review

How the West surrendered Czechoslovakia to Hitler

33
80 years ago, in March 1939, Hitler sent troops into Bohemia and Moravia. Czechoslovakia ceased to exist, already in 1938, curtailed in favor of Germany, Poland and Hungary. 14 March Slovakia declared its independence, but in fact was under the control of the Third Reich. March 15 decree of Hitler, the Czech Republic and Moravia were declared protectorate of the German Empire.


prehistory

The Third Reich, taking advantage of the support of Western masters interested in the speedy restoration of the military and economic power of the German Empire, to throw it into a “crusade” to the East, against the USSR-Russia, quickly eliminated the restrictions of the Versailles system and began to round off its possessions at the expense of its neighbors.

Hitler was preparing for a big war and solved the task of reuniting all Germans in one empire. In March 1938, the task of reunifying Germany with Austria was solved. Berlin took the first important step in creating a "middle Europe" - Hitler's European Union. The Germans received a strategic base for capturing Czechoslovakia (previously it was part of the Austrian Empire) and further expansion from South-Eastern Europe.

At the same time, the German generals were afraid of Hitler’s so aggressive and reckless policy. He was warned against the seizure of Austria, and then action against Czechoslovakia. The Third Reich had not yet restored its military potential, was not ready for war. Even Czechoslovakia alone could then successfully confront the Reich, it needed only political support. But France and England could easily stop Germany with a harsh political reaction and concentration of troops on its western border. However, Hitler resolutely went to his goals, not listening to quite reasonable warnings of his military. The fact was that he was sure that he would not be stopped, confined to censure. The Fuhrer knew that the owners of the West would surrender to him a significant part of Europe, so that he would then go to the East.

Fascist Italy, which had previously prevented the seizure of Austria, and was stronger than the newly created Nazi state, was now battered in Spain and Abyssinia (Ethiopia). The Third Reich surpassed the former "elder brother" in technology and military and economic power. Now Rome obediently followed a strong partner. England and France closed their eyes to the seizure of Austria. The masters of London and of Paris, who passively followed him, relied on Hitler, increasing the power of the Reich in order to set the Germans against the Russians again. Therefore, the diplomacy of England and France was silent, while Hitler pressed political resistance to Vienna. Left alone, Vienna capitulated. Chamberlain’s British government showed a characteristic pattern of hypocrisy: at first it protested, condemned Berlin, and in April it formally recognized the seizure of Austria by Germany. The fact that the leading Western powers are not inclined to give a collective rebuff to Berlin’s aggressive policy, Moscow noted. At the Plenum of the League of Nations 21 September 1938, the Soviet delegation stated: "The disappearance of the Austrian state went unnoticed for the League of Nations."

Sudeten question

20 February 1938, the Hitler in the Reichstag, announced his desire to unite "10 millions of Germans living across the border." The German press actively demanded to satisfy the interests of the Germans in the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. Among the Sudeten Germans, the “Sudetenteme German party” Henlein was actively working. After the capture of Austria by the Reich, supporters of Henlein demanded territorial autonomy for the Sudetes. The same autonomy was demanded for Slovakia by the nationalist Glinka party.

Prague then had the opportunity to defend independence: the army was quite combat-ready, one of the best in Europe, had advanced equipment, good personnel, relied on strong frontier defensive lines and the military industry. However, the fate of Czechoslovakia was dependent on the decision of the owners of the West, primarily France, with whom Prague had an agreement on mutual assistance. Czechoslovak leaders themselves did not dare to confront Germany.

However, Paris was then in the wake of British politics. And London demanded that by all means avoid a collision with Germany. The fact is that the masters of London and Washington created the project “Hitler” in order to once again pit Germany and Russia. Therefore, Hitler was consistently given one position after another in order for Germany to strengthen and be able to attack the USSR. Later, Britain and the United States were to finish off Germany and establish their world order on the planet..

Britain, first through the press, and then through diplomatic channels began to put pressure on Prague. The Czechs were led to the idea that Britain and France would not fight for Czechoslovakia, so the Sudeten question should be resolved peacefully. Thus, in conversations with the Czech ambassador Massarik, the British foreign minister, Halifax, persistently urged him to prevent the war, to satisfy the demands of the Sudeten Germans. In the summer of 1938, the British and French recognized Hitler’s proposals on Czechoslovakia as acceptable, which became the basis for the future Munich Agreement.

July 22 London 1938 demanded that Prague take measures to "pacify Europe." The Czechs agreed to begin negotiations on the autonomy of the Sudeten Germans. However, Henlein and his associates were already few. July 29 Genlein made a declaration in Breslavl, where he proclaimed the principles of German Pan-Germanism: all Germans must live in one state and obey only German law. London immediately put pressure on Prague to conclude an agreement as soon as possible. Germany at that time put military pressure: they called on the reserve, started its mobilization, carried out military maneuvers, built new fortifications on the border of Czechoslovakia, German aircraft invaded Czech airspace, provocations began on the border, etc. threatened Prague that in the event of war Czechoslovakia would be crushed by Hitler's hordes, therefore it was necessary to yield. As a result, Prague was blamed for the fact that its tough stance could cause a general war in Europe.

In France, the military talked about the strategic need to protect Czechoslovakia. General Gamelin argued that Czechoslovakia can and must be protected, since it is a question of the security of France itself. The strongest army of Western Europe - the French, in alliance with the Czechoslovak army could stop the German aggression. However, French politicians were set differently. They believed that "a better world with Hitler than a war against him along with Voroshilov." Therefore, Daladier told the Czechs that France could not fulfill its allied obligations with respect to Czechoslovakia.

15 September 1938 was the meeting of Chamberlain with Hitler in Berchtesgaden. Hitler demanded the final and complete self-determination of the Sudeten Germans. After that, Chamberlain held a meeting with Daladier and Bonn. The British and French finally decided to donate Czechoslovakia in order to negotiate with Hitler. September 19 Prague was handed a note stating that, in order to prevent a European war, it should immediately hand over the Sudetenland to the Reich. Prague was promised an "international guarantee" of its new borders. In fact, London and Paris demanded suicide from Prague.

20 September Prague asked England and France to reconsider this decision and submit the issue to arbitration in accordance with the German-Czechoslovak agreement 1925 of the year. In the evening of the same day, the British warned the Czech government that if they persisted further, they would no longer "be interested in his fate." The French repeated this threat. September 21 Czechoslovak President Benes was presented an ultimatum: the demand for the immediate surrender of Czechoslovakia. Prague had to accept the Anglo-French plan, or it became "the only culprit of the inevitable war." Also, the Czechs warned that if they unite with the Russians, the war will take the form of a "crusade against the Bolsheviks." In the end, Prague capitulated. Thus, in fact, Czechoslovakia was crushed not by Germany, which Prague was ready to withstand the onslaught, but by “western friends” —England and France.

22 September 1938 of the year Chamberlain told Hitler during a meeting in Godesberg that the matter was settled - the issue of the Sudeten Germans was resolved in the interests of Germany. But now Hitler was not enough and this. He demanded that at the same time the territorial claims of Hungary and Poland to Czechoslovakia be satisfied. September 24 British transferred to Prague new demands of Berlin. On September 25, the Czechoslovak envoy Massarik presented Prague with a reply from the Chamberlain - the German proposals were called “absolutely unacceptable”. However, London continued its diplomatic pressure on Prague. In England and France, they staged a panic, "blackmail with war," fanning the threat of war with Germany over Czechoslovakia. Public opinion was inclined to "pacification" of Germany. Chekhov was shown as possible perpetrators of the start of a big war in Europe.

Hitler, seeing that not everything is going according to plan, raged, made a mental attack. In the evening of September 26, he spoke at the Berlin Sports Palace with new threats against Czechoslovakia. “If by October 1,” the Führer said, “the Sudetenland will not be handed over to Germany, I, Hitler, will go, as the first soldier, against Czechoslovakia.” He promised that after the settlement of the Sudeten question, Germany would not have any territorial claims in Europe: "We do not need Czechs." At the same time, the Czechs were accused of atrocities and oppression against the Sudeten Germans. Germany was seized with military psychosis.

September 29 The Munich-based European leaders of Germany, England, France, Italy - Hitler, Chamberlain, Daladier and Mussolini met in Munich in September. The fate of Czechoslovakia was decided without her participation. The Czech envoys were accepted in Munich only to report the results of the conference. Prague was offered to transfer to Germany all areas bordering on it, and not just the Sudetenland. These areas of the Czechs had to clean up before October 1938 10 year. All military fortifications that were in these areas were handed over to the Germans. Prague also had to properly resolve the issue of minorities with Hungary and Poland. It was meant that Czechoslovakia should transfer the relevant areas of Hungary and Poland.

Prague, under the pressure of London and Paris, capitulated. October 1 1938, the German troops freely entered Czechoslovakia. They captured the Sudetenland and a number of other areas and cities where there were almost no Germans. Slovakia gave Hungary the southern and eastern regions where the Hungarians constituted the majority of the population. Hungary received a part of the Carpathian Rus. Poland simultaneously with Germany sent troops to the Cieszyn region. At the insistence of the Germans, President Benes resigns. Thus, Czechoslovakia partially lost its sovereignty, 38% of its territory, a significant part of the population and its industrial potential. Her military security was destroyed. Border fortifications were lost. The Germans were in 30 km from Prague, the Czechs were forbidden to build new fortifications on the new border.

How the West surrendered Czechoslovakia to Hitler

At the time of the signing of the Munich Agreement. From left to right: Chamberlain, Daladier, Hitler, Mussolini and Ciano

The liquidation of Czechoslovakia

Further pliability of London and Paris on various issues showed Hitler that he could complete the seizure of Czechoslovakia. In particular, London and Berlin developed the concept of "eternal peace" on the basis of the redistribution of the world between Britain and Germany. The British hinted that when moving eastward, the Germans would not encounter interference from England. London and Paris established diplomatic relations with the victorious Spanish regime of Franco without any preconditions. France made concessions to Spain and Italy.

Initially, Berlin began to put pressure on Prague, so that the Czechs would give autonomy to Slovakia and Carpathian Rus. 7-8 October 1938, the Czechoslovak government granted autonomy to Slovakia and Carpathian Rus. On the initiative of Hitler’s diplomacy in Vienna 2 on November 1938, a compromise decision was made between Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia. Czechoslovakia handed over to Hungary the southern regions of Slovakia (about 10 thousand km²) and the south-western regions of Carpathian Rus (about 2 thousand km²). In December, 1938 - January 1939, Berlin made it clear to Budapest that if the Carpathian Rus (Ukraine) were captured, the Hungarians would not meet Germany’s resistance. For this, Budapest promised to join the Anti-Comintern Pact, which was done in March 1939.

German diplomacy actively worked with Slovak nationalists. They were supposed to play the role of the Sudeten Germans, following the example of 1938 of the year. In Slovakia, the separatist movement was actively developing. In Germany, the press actively fanned the conflict between the Czechs and the Slovaks. Czech authorities accused of "atrocities." In Bratislava, a coup was organized. 9 March 1939, the Czech troops occupied the territory of Slovakia and removed the Slovak Prime Minister J. Tiso from power. The leaders of the Slovak separatists Tiso and Durchansky went to Hitler and asked for his protection from the Czech "oppressors". 13 March 1939 of the Year Tiso in Berlin declared the independence of Slovakia under the patronage of Germany. 14 March, the Slovak parliament declared independence. Tiso became prime minister and then president of “independent” Slovakia.

Events in Slovakia found an immediate response in Carpathian Rus. The Voloshin government formed there 15 March also declared independence. Voloshin asked for independence under the protection of the Reich. However, Berlin refused and offered not to resist Hungary. Hungarian troops occupied the Carpathian Rus by March 18.


Tanking of the Hungarian occupation troops of the Italian production "Fiat-Ansaldo" CV-35 enter the streets of the Czechoslovak city of Hust

The Hungarian tankettes of the Italian production Fiat-Ansaldo CV-35 and the soldiers on the street of the captured Czechoslovak city of Hust in Carpathian Rus. March 1939 of the year. Photo source: http://waralbum.ru

On the night of March 15, German troops began the occupation of the remnants of Czechoslovakia. The Fuhrer demanded the arrival of the Czech President in Berlin. President Gah with Foreign Minister Khvalkovsky arrived in the German capital. Here they were presented with a finished document on the final liquidation of the state and national independence of Czechoslovakia. Hitler told Gaha and Khvalkovsky that now is not the time to talk and he only needs their signature on the document according to which Bohemia (Czech Republic) and Moravia were included in the German Empire. Under severe psychological pressure (threats to destroy Prague, etc.), the Czech representatives surrendered. 1939 March Bohemia and Moravia declared a protectorate of Germany.

By note of 17 March, 1939, Berlin informed the world about the establishment of a protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia. This was justified by the fact that "for a millennium the Bohemian-Moravian lands were the living space of the German people." And Czechoslovakia was an “artificial formation”, a “source of anxiety” and discovered “internal non-viability”, therefore the state actually collapsed. And Berlin intervened to restore the "foundations of rational order in Central Europe."

Moscow refused to recognize the inclusion of the Czech Republic in the Reich. England, France and the United States expressed a formal protest.


Czechoslovak President Emil Gaha and Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler. 15 March 1939


Residents of Brno meet German troops. March 1939

Results

Thus, the owners of the West surrendered Czechoslovakia Germany. Hitler received an important strategic territory in the center of Europe, a strong Czechoslovak army was eliminated, which with the support of Britain and France could withstand the expansion of Germany. Now Hitler could start a war in the west or east. The Germans got the arms and stocks of the 30 Czechoslovak divisions (including the 3 armored vehicles and equipment), powerful Czechoslovak industry, including the military. So, by the year 1942, up to 40% of all the arms and ammunition of the German Empire was produced in the territory of the former Czechoslovakia.

The Germans conducted the ethnic and professional Germanization of the Czech Republic. Many Czech workers and engineers agreed to "become" Germans and provided with their work the work of the war machine of the Third Reich. The anti-fascist underground in the Czech Republic was almost imperceptible; the first partisans appeared only in the 1944 year, when it became obvious that Germany was losing the war. Therefore, the military industry of the former Czechoslovakia until the end of the Great War, regularly worked on the Reich. Hundreds of thousands of Czechs in 1939 - 1945 worked in Germany itself. In addition, the Czechs served in the Wehrmacht and the SS troops.

The army created in Slovakia actively fought on the side of Nazi Germany. 50-thousand the Slovak army (3 infantry divisions and other units) participated in the war with Poland. Then the Slovaks took part in the war with the USSR. In July, the Slovak Army Corps (1941-I and 1-I Infantry Divisions) was a part of the German Army Group South, in 2, a total of about 45 thousand soldiers. The hull supported the Slovak Air Force's 63 aircraft. In August, 1941, the infantry divisions decided to withdraw to Slovakia, instead they formed a mobile and security divisions. As a result, Slovak troops fought for Germany until April 1945.


The bridge over the Odra River (Oder), through which German troops enter the Czech city of Ostrava 15 March 1939.
Author:
33 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mimohod
    Mimohod 13 March 2019 05: 24
    +7
    And after that, to hear that only Hitler is to blame for everything is ridiculous, isn't it, the beast was raised and raised to a pedestal of power, quite apparently, decent people, but in fact accomplices of the Nazi criminal war, here they are friends of the Nazis, recently, the notorious "professor" , wanted to throw a bunch of shit at Molotov, Chamberlain turns out to be the best friend of Nazism and not even Hitler alone, but how many "friends" were behind this Chamberlain ????
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 March 2019 07: 55
      +15
      Quote: Mimohod
      recently, the notorious "professor" wanted to throw a bunch of shit at Molotov, Chamberlain turns out to be the best friend of Nazism

      The fact is generally well known. The USSR stopped trying to create a defensive European Union against Germany precisely as a result of the Munich crisis. And before him, it was the USSR that showed the maximum effort to create a European security system; he was the most consistent political opponent of Germany. The funny thing is that one of the best sources about how the USSR tried to save Europe from Hitler and the world from World War II is Churchill's memoirs, in which he gives, to put it mildly, soooo negative assessment to Chamberlain and his comrades.
      Churchill wrote quite frankly that the USSR had done everything to form a new Entente, but his efforts were rejected with contempt. And that the USSR simply had no choice but to try to negotiate with Hitler.
      That is, Churchill sees absolutely nothing infernal in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, and does not at all blame the Soviet Union for it. On the contrary, he says that the USSR simply forced the short-sighted policy of England and France to this, the surrender of which was the surrender of Czechoslovakia. That is, according to Churchill, it is England and France that are to blame for the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact.
      And the professor ... well, what do you want from him? :))))))))
      1. Mimohod
        Mimohod 13 March 2019 08: 39
        +3
        Churchill was directly spinning in this political cesspool and of course understood the whole component of Munich's betrayal, and he himself supported the anti-communist vector of that Europe, in Fulton, in 1946, he proved it well .....
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 March 2019 09: 16
          +5
          Quote: Mimohod
          Churchill himself spun in this political cesspool

          Not. Chamberlain was his political opponent, and Churchill at the time of the same Munich took a position ... approximately equivalent to a deputy in the State Duma. That is, in a political sense, his weight was negligible.
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 13 March 2019 11: 01
        +2
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        The funny thing is that one of the best sources about how the USSR tried to save Europe from Hitler and the world from the Second World War is Churchill's memoirs, in which he gives, to put it mildly, a very negative assessment of Chamberlain and his comrades.

        Comrade Churchill makes it easy ... smile
        In fact, in his memoirs, Churchill kicks Chamberlain in order to look like a wise and sagacious politician against his background and hide his mistakes that led to the situation in 1938. At the same time, Winnie is strenuously silent about inconvenient facts for him - his activities as Chancellor of the Treasury, which actually deprived Britain of the army and air force, as well as the efforts of Chamberlain's "peacemaker" to restore the British armed forces.
        It is interesting what Churchill would do if he accepted Britain in 1937 - and without at the time of Munich having neither the FAC, nor the ground forces? Then he would write in his memoirs - how wisely he acted, having gained time for the rearmament of Britain at the expense of surrendering to Czechoslovakia Hitler? wink
        1. evgic
          evgic 13 March 2019 11: 27
          +2
          I hate the fat hog, but he clearly understood all the consequences of the Munich agreement, and did not believe in Hitler's loyalty. "Between war and shame, we chose shame. But we will get war too."
          1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 March 2019 15: 59
            +3
            Quote: evgic
            I can not tolerate a thick hog

            Yes? And I treat him with respect, although it is the enemy.
            1. evgic
              evgic 13 March 2019 16: 07
              0
              So I respect, otherwise I would not quote. But I can not stand.
              1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 March 2019 17: 02
                0
                Quote: evgic
                So I respect, otherwise I would not quote. But I can not stand.

                Clear:))))
        2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 March 2019 15: 58
          +2
          Quote: Alexey RA
          In fact, in his memoirs, Churchill kicks Chamberlain in order to look like a wise and shrewd politician against his background and hide his mistakes that led to the 1938 situation of the year.

          Alexey, this is impossible. Churchill had absolutely no political weight to influence the politics of England in that period. I repeat, in the political sense, he was nobody at that time.
          Quote: Alexey RA
          At the same time, Vinnie stubbornly ignores inconvenient facts for him - his activities as Chancellor of the Treasury, which effectively deprived Britain of the army and air force

          Yes, Churchill failed as a financier, but it was his failure of the 20-s, when Hitler was still nothing at all. Churchill left this post in 1929, and can hardly have any relation to the events described. With 1929 g he is out of work.
          Quote: Alexey RA
          I wonder what Churchill would have done by taking Britain to 1937 - and not having KVVS or ground forces at the time of Munich behind?

          But France had them :)))) As we know, the postponement to 1939 was beneficial to Germany, and in 1937, I apologize, Germany could not withstand France. Thus, the defensive alliance of France, England, and the USSR, with determination to use force, stopped Germany completely reliably, even without the army and air force of England
          1. brn521
            brn521 13 March 2019 16: 36
            0
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            and the USSR

            The USSR must still be excluded. He seemed to be seen as a potentially more dangerous adversary, which should not be allowed into Europe under any circumstances. Especially in Czechoslovakia, where class and national contradictions escalated against the backdrop of industrial growth.
          2. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 13 March 2019 17: 48
            0
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Alexey, this is impossible. Churchill had absolutely no political weight to influence the politics of England in that period. I repeat, in the political sense, he was nobody at that time.

            This is how Churchill made his mistakes before Chamberlain came - when Vinnie still had power. The austerity of the military budget and the concept of "10 years without war" are precisely the legacy of Chancellor Vinnie, which Chamberlain had to urgently overcome.
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            But France had them :))))

            The problem is that France categorically did not want to fight. And this was clear even before Chamberlain came to power. Therefore, Britain had to rely on herself.
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            As we know, the postponement until 1939 benefited Germany, and in 1937, I’m sorry, Germany could not resist France.

            In 1936, Germany could resist France even less. And the reason was iron - a violation of the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles. So what? But nothing - France refused to fight. And following the results of the remilitarization of the Rhine region, Britain began to rebuild the armed forces. Which in 1936 the Island Empire simply did not have.
            1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 14 March 2019 00: 22
              0
              Quote: Alexey RA
              This is how Churchill made his mistakes before Chamberlain came - when Vinnie still had power. The austerity of the military budget and the concept of "10 years without war" are precisely the legacy of Chancellor Vinnie, which Chamberlain had to urgently overcome.

              I agree, but Alexey, we're talking about 2 different things here. I have never claimed that Churchill is such a sinless genius who did everything right. But Churchill led his economic policy long before Hitler came to power, so these are unrelated things.
              Quote: Alexey RA
              The problem is that France categorically did not want to fight.

              I do not agree, at the dawn of Nazism there were several cases when France was ready to announce mobilization. She was being held by Chamberlain
              Quote: Alexey RA
              In 1936, Germany could stand up to France even less. And the reason was iron - a violation of the provisions of the Versailles Treaty. So what? And nothing - France refused to fight.

              Refuse refused something, but how?
              "For France, this was a terrible blow. Sarrault and Flandin were inclined to immediately announce a general mobilization. If they were able to cope with their task, they would have done so and thereby forced others to follow their example. For France, it was vital Question: But she, apparently, could not act without the consent of England.
              However, this is an explanation, but by no means an excuse. This question was of vital importance to France, and any French government worthy of this name had to make certain decisions and remain faithful to the obligations assumed on the basis of the treaty. More than once in these unstable years, French ministers, who were part of endlessly changing governments, were content to find in English pacifism a justification for their own pacifism. In any case, in their intention to resist German aggression, they were not encouraged by the British. On the contrary, if they hesitated to take action, then their British allies did not hesitate to dissuade them "
              That is, France, in principle, could speak if she felt behind herself the support of England, at least political. But this did not happen
        3. The comment was deleted.
      3. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ 13 March 2019 16: 10
        0
        The fact is generally well known. The USSR stopped trying to create a defensive European Union against Germany precisely following the results of the Munich crisis.
        - Andrey from Chelyabinsk (Andrey)

        I will supplement you, Andrei, with the fact that the USSR, when creating the anti-Hitler union in Europe before the partition of Czechoslovakia, achieved the creation of bilateral defense alliances of the USSR-France and the USSR-Czechoslovakia.
        True, these treaties were practically unilateral and demanded only obligations from the USSR in the event of an attack on France or Czechoslovakia, and did not bear the corresponding reverse obligations.
        Before the partition of Czechoslovakia, the leadership of the USSR informed the leadership of Czechoslovakia and France about the readiness of about 30 divisions of the Red Army to help defend Czechoslovakia, the only question was crossing the territory of Poland, since there was no joint border between the USSR and Czechoslovakia at that time.
        The proposal of the Soviet leadership to help Czechoslovakia was then ignored because of the reluctance of the Polish leaders to let the USSR troops through their territory and the reluctance of the leadership of France and England to really fight Hitler.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 13 March 2019 17: 01
          +3
          I absolutely agree with you on all points, thanks for adding!
    2. solzh
      solzh 13 March 2019 09: 49
      0
      Quote: Mimohod
      seemingly decent people

      Even in appearance, in the photo of the signing of the agreement in the article, they all look like maniacs.
  2. avia12005
    avia12005 13 March 2019 06: 37
    0
    And these countries, which are now members of NATO, are going to fight the Russians again?
  3. Olgovich
    Olgovich 13 March 2019 07: 01
    -3
    The fact is that the owners of London and Washington created the Hitler project to once again pit Germany and Russia. Therefore, Hitler was successively given one position after another so that Germany would gain strength and be able to attack the USSR / Later Britain and the USA should to finish off Germany and establish its world order on the planet.

    So they installed it once already-Versailles in 1919 city request
    1. Prometheus
      Prometheus 13 March 2019 08: 26
      +2
      Quote: Olgovich

      So they installed it once already-Versailles in 1919 city request

      Good sarcasm)

      According to the article - here I look at the wedges, and I think: how people fit inside ...
  4. Lamatinets
    Lamatinets 13 March 2019 08: 09
    -1
    And now the situation is similar. And yet, the Czechs worked so hard throughout the war on the Reich, up to 30% of the equipment and weapons were manufactured in the Czech Republic, and only in May 1945 did they suddenly rise up against you)))) They smeared themselves, and they would have been declared a satellite of Nazism.
  5. Gardamir
    Gardamir 13 March 2019 08: 18
    +3
    I would like these words in the text to be highlighted
    Poland simultaneously with Germany sent troops to the Tieszyn region.

    So when did World War II begin?
    1. Lamatinets
      Lamatinets 13 March 2019 08: 40
      +2
      in 1931 it began in China
  6. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 13 March 2019 10: 33
    0
    The Third Reich, taking advantage of the support of Western masters interested in the speedy restoration of the military and economic power of the German Empire, to throw it into a “crusade” to the East, against the USSR-Russia, quickly eliminated the restrictions of the Versailles system and began to round off its possessions at the expense of its neighbors.

    And why would some collective West restore Germany if the USSR of the mid-30s with its 20 personnel divisions was crushed by a coalition of countries of the sanitary cordon and Japan?
    We are always trying to imagine the West of the 30s as a kind of monolith, which in a single impulse was going to defeat the USSR. But in fact, each of the countries of this West solved its problems at the expense of others. The same Britain revived Germany as a counterweight to France, which was too much strengthened on the continent after Versailles.
    The masters of London and Paris passively following him relied on Hitler, the growth of the Reich’s power, to again set the Germans against the Russians.

    If we take Munich, then the owners of London (more precisely, Chamberlain) desperately tried to buy time in order to prepare for the great war brewing in Europe. Because it suddenly turned out that the German fighting hamster had grown so much on American feed that it began to pose a threat to European powers (however, the hamster also desperately bluffed, trying to appear more powerful than it actually was). On the other hand, according to the results of the remilitarization of the Rhine region, it suddenly turned out that the French alone did not want to appease the Reich, and Britain actually had no armed forces. So they decided to feed the hamster every little thing with lime and hastily build up his army and the Air Force while he digests it.
  7. smaug78
    smaug78 13 March 2019 11: 29
    0
    If you remove the typical conspiratorial howls of the author, then a good article
  8. Fitter65
    Fitter65 13 March 2019 14: 11
    0
    Still, the Russian language is great and powerful. After all, this phrase ...
    Moscow refused to recognize the inclusion of the Czech Republic in the Reich. England, France and the United States expressed a formal protest.

    It can be interpreted that England, France and the United States formally protested the refusal of Moscow to recognize the inclusion of the Czech Republic in the Reich. laughing Of course, they expressed Germany’s protest, but Moscow’s refusal also revolted them very much, and they came up with a punishment later ... Germany wasn’t excluded for the Anschluss of Austria and the seizure of the Czech Republic from the League of Nations, and the USSR was expelled for pushing the bordering from Leningrad. ...
  9. NF68
    NF68 13 March 2019 17: 51
    0
    The Czechs themselves are still heaven's boobies. Whatever the Poles were between the world wars, the Poles decided to defend their country. Even if they were promised some kind of obvious or imaginary help from France and Great Britain.
  10. bone1
    bone1 13 March 2019 19: 50
    +1
    80 years have passed - and still there is no answer to a simple question - why, in general, did you have to surrender Czechoslovakia? belay
    1. Cetron
      Cetron 13 March 2019 23: 43
      0
      It was hoped that Germany, with Hungary and Poland (Poland then positioned itself as an ally of Germany), would occupy the Baltic states (they would not even rock the boat, Memel (Klaipeda) resigned meekly) and start a war with the USSR.
      1. bone1
        bone1 14 March 2019 17: 47
        0
        And Czechoslovakia here what side?
  11. Reklastik
    Reklastik 13 March 2019 23: 26
    0
    [quote] The Third Reich still regained its military potential, was not ready in the war [quote] - was not, Oga
  12. bandabas
    bandabas 14 March 2019 19: 02
    0
    As for the Czechs and Slovaks. Enterprises for the benefit of Germany worked there until the capture of these puppet countries by Soviet troops. Ah, the Prague uprising? Because of this, at the end of the war, tens of thousands of Soviet soldiers died, saving ... Well, they are not our brothers.
    1. Molot1979
      Molot1979 15 May 2019 08: 54
      0
      Not for Prague, our great-grandfathers sacrificed themselves after the Victory, but for the sake of eliminating the 900th Scherner group. Given Churchill’s ideas, sending the captured Germans to a new war with the USSR was not a whim, but a conscious necessity. Well, the Czechs just appeared along the way.
  13. Molot1979
    Molot1979 15 May 2019 08: 50
    0
    Who, excuse me, surrendered Czechoslovakia? I don't like the West, but the truth is more precious. I do not see much fault of the West. The Czechs themselves did not defend themselves. They had powerful fortifications and an army at least as good as the German one. But instead of resisting, the Czechs simply lay down and spread their legs. How could Western democracies ever force the Czechs to surrender? Threaten that they will be offended? No, what happened is the fault of the Czechs themselves. It's just that the old gentlemen suddenly returned and the slaves immediately remembered their place. Looking at such "Slavic brothers" it is not surprising that Adolf underestimated the Russian people.