China's first aircraft carrier Type001A assembly sent to sea for trials

52
Chinese media reported that on the eve of the PLA Navy aircraft carrier Type001A left the port of Dalian and went to the open sea.

China's first aircraft carrier Type001A assembly sent to sea for trials




This happened literally a couple of days after another aircraft undergoing modernization at the Dalian shipyard, the Liaoning, went to the next test. Recall that the Type001A is the first aircraft carrier built by China. A "Liaoning" was laid in the 1985 year at the shipyard in Nikolaev under the name "Riga", was subsequently sold to Beijing by Ukraine.

The Chinese media say that the Liaoning went to sea for the next stage of testing the deck aviation. This is a test of the J-15 aircraft. These are fighters developed by the Chinese Shenyang Aircraft Corporation. The glider is made according to the concept of the Su-33.

Stated that the engines of the aircraft carrier Type001a launched 27 February.

Against this background, it became aware of the closure of one of the sea areas. This indicates that it is in them that aircraft carriers are tested. At the same time, as noted in the media, "Liaoning" has already completed its part of the tests and headed for the port of Qingdao. But the aircraft carrier Type001A, allegedly, will go to one of the Chinese ports on March 5. During this time, it is planned to test not only its driving characteristics, but also the take-off and landing of the mentioned J-15.

From a post on one of the Chinese blogs:
The first Chinese aircraft carrier of its own design was launched into the sea to check the performance of the main systems: communication systems, radar and navigation equipment, landing support systems for aircraft, ship control systems, etc.


It is known that for the aircraft carrier with the nomenclature designation Type001A already picked up the name. It will be called "Shandong" ("Shandong"). According to the latest data, this name is approved, and officially the ship will receive it by the end of March of the current year.
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    28 February 2019 08: 52
    Moreover, as noted in the media, Liaoning has already completed its part of the tests and headed to the port of Qingdao
    I wonder if the current "friction" between India and Pakistan will accelerate the process of selling it to Pakistan?
    1. +8
      28 February 2019 09: 04
      Mdya. This is the pace of construction. Soon they will have several "6 fleets", as the striped ones will.
      1. 0
        28 February 2019 10: 17
        Quote: tatarin_ru
        Mdya. This is the pace of construction. Soon they will have several "6 fleets", as the striped ones will.

        So they are Chinese - one and a half billion !!! Just think of this ... One and a half billion !! From each for ten bucks, that's "Shandong with Liaolin!" We are all, there is nothing and then we are puffing ..
    2. +12
      28 February 2019 09: 07
      China's first aircraft carrier Type001A assembly sent to sea for trials

      Quote: cniza
      It hurts, he doesn’t look like his own


      Whatever it was, but he is. In spite of the neighboring branch, where the bones are being "washed" to the not yet existing "Leader". And as a reproach to "effective managers" ...
      1. +8
        28 February 2019 09: 56
        Yes, these managers stuffed pockets full of light and go. I even think that they get another salary from (partners) for their (labor).
      2. 0
        28 February 2019 13: 41
        ..... only whether reproach to managers ???? And so even externally - a copy of the development of the times of the USSR.
        1. 0
          28 February 2019 15: 03
          Quote: Kent0001
          And so even externally - a copy of the development of the times of the USSR.

          Whose electronics are you around? wink
    3. 0
      28 February 2019 09: 34
      Interestingly, the current "friction" between India and Pakistan, accelerate the process of selling it to Pakistan?

      And the meaning is that China itself to remain with a bare ass? They kind of like after laying / building 2 more Liaoning aircraft carriers wanted to transfer
    4. 0
      28 February 2019 10: 30
      Quote: svp67
      I wonder if the current "friction" between India and Pakistan will accelerate the process of selling it to Pakistan?

      like speed up time and tomorrow will come 2028 year?
  2. +4
    28 February 2019 08: 57
    “The first Chinese aircraft carrier of its own design was put out to sea to test the operability of the main systems: communication systems, radar and navigation equipment, landing support systems for carrier-based aircraft, ship control systems, etc.



    It painfully does not look like his own, but well done ...
    1. +5
      28 February 2019 09: 43
      Well, this is the maximum that squeezed out of Krechet in fact. Plus, a full translation at the project level - under the norms, requirements and equipment relevant from China. Plus, an increase in the hangar due to the project redistribution of space. Plus, again - finally Av got a working radar monitoring system, not conditionally working Resistor and Mars with problems of beam transfer between the canvases. Moreover, it’s not unique (as mentioned above), but a large-scale one with a destroyer.


      The next one, by the way, will be according to another CATOBAR scheme - and will be similar to Kitty Hawk most likely.
  3. -3
    28 February 2019 09: 10
    yes - the dragon grows stronger ...
    when will the "power of siberia" start working? they need to produce!
    1. 0
      28 February 2019 09: 25
      What do you know about Power of Siberia? More precisely, I see that you don't know anything, based on your comment ...
      Pure methane gas will go to China, and all components will remain in Russia, for this a giant chemical is being built. a factory in Russia ... but by the way, you do trolling ... you are not interested in the details ...
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 09: 39
        Quote: Nasr
        Pure methane gas will go to China, and all components will remain in Russia, for this a giant chemical is being built. factory in Russia

        that is, purified gas will go to China, and all harmful impurities and components will remain in Russia?
        1. -3
          28 February 2019 09: 46
          Quote: aglet
          ... and all harmful impurities and components will remain in Russia?

          Purified gas will go to China - precisely, it is suitable only as fuel! And "harmful", as you said, gas is a treasure ..
          "harmful" .... wassat
          1. +2
            28 February 2019 09: 48
            Quote: Nasr
            "harmful" ....

            Well, yes, it’s harmful, because the most useful part of natural gas, methane, will go to China
            1. -1
              28 February 2019 09: 51
              Quote: aglet
              Quote: Nasr
              "harmful" ....

              Well, yes, it’s harmful, because the most useful part of natural gas, methane, will go to China

              Do not hunt LikBez (eradication of illiteracy) to conduct .. look in net and understand

              I specially give you a reference - study, enlighten:
              http://neftianka.ru/amurgpp/
              1. +4
                28 February 2019 10: 40
                Quote: Nasr
                not hunting LikBez (elimination of illiteracy) to carry out ..

                I don’t need to conduct educational program, I worked for enough time in Gazprom to find out what gas consists of and what is in it. The task of this plant is to clean, dry gas, remove non-methane - the Chinese need pure methane. This is stated , and in plain text. it is their consumers who receive a complete set of everything that comes from the well, excluding sand and water. and the Chinese do not need this precious helium, dear ethane-propane, and especially nitrogen, and do not need it for nothing, and for money, all the more not needed. if all of these additives had at least some practical value, the Chinese would never give them away. they also forgot to mention hydrogen sulfide, which Siberian gas is extremely rich in, an extremely aggressive substance. in combination with water gives sulfuric acid. and now I am tormented by vague doubts that this GPZ was muddied just for him, so that the Chinese pipes would not rust. and all these excuses about helium, etc. are just excuses. everything is built on guesses and assumptions. all the more so, in nature there is nothing, everything is at the stage of development and deliberation. the Chinese simply don’t want to take gas with impurities, but Miller, well, really wants to sell, at any price, if only to sell
                1. 0
                  28 February 2019 10: 42
                  For a long time you climbed net ... laughing One question - why the Germans do not clean the gas? Moreover, they are categorically against the purification of our gas, because BASS will stop ... bully
                  And tell me where exactly did you work in Gazprom?
                  1. +2
                    28 February 2019 10: 57
                    Quote: Nasr
                    For a long time you climbed net ..

                    I explain, I typed for a long time, my fingers are thick, it’s hard to get one key. probably this is not stipulated by the agreement with the Germans. and the Germans themselves extract from it a bunch of everything, including motor oils, and motor fuel
                    .
                    Quote: Nasr
                    Pure methane gas will go to China

                    that’s just a clean, keyword. and methane, for your information, is not only fuel, but also raw materials for the chemical industry, and once again buying a Chinese plastic craft, you can proudly think to yourself - but we supply pure raw materials to China, and leave all unclean materials to ourselves. But I worked for Gazprom: in production, in transport, in storage
                    1. -1
                      28 February 2019 11: 07
                      What is most interesting, polymers and rubbers are obtained from ethane, propane, butane, pentane
                      1. +1
                        28 February 2019 11: 26
                        Quote: Nasr

                        What is most interesting, polymers and rubbers are obtained from ethane, propane, butane, pentane

                        probably the Chinese are not interested, because for the possible 5-6% ethane-butane, etc., they would get guaranteed 8-9% nitrogen and it is not known how much hydrogen sulfide. and they need it? here it is in the contract and wrote about cleaning
          2. +3
            28 February 2019 10: 02
            Quote: Nasr
            Purified gas will go to China - namely, it is suitable only as fuel!

            Fuel, this is energy, energy, this is production ...

            Powerful industry = powerful state.

            And for those who giggle from the outside, having "fused" the purified gas, and at the same time having done nothing to boost their own economy, they will suck on this very finger ...
            1. -4
              28 February 2019 10: 05
              No one argues that methane fuel ... and nothing more! But the Germans can’t get pure methane ... they need a chemical. industry worked and developed ...

              I gave the link above, read, a lot will become clear to you ...
              1. +1
                28 February 2019 10: 09
                Quote: Nasr
                I gave the link above, read, a lot will become clear to you ...

                Yes, I know that rabbits are not only valuable fur, but also three or four kilograms of easily digestible ... SALA fellow lol
                1. 0
                  28 February 2019 10: 11
                  Strange, you know, but write about some kind of "fingers" ...
                  really read ... and stop writing about "fingers" ..
                  1. +5
                    28 February 2019 10: 17
                    Quote: Nasr
                    really read and stop writing about "fingers"

                    I will stop, but only when your military-industrial complex will be able to produce not one Su-57 per year, but at least a dozen, when the USC launches the Leader destroyer into series, when the Armata enters the troops in a continuous stream, when the Superjet and "MS" will completely replace imports.

                    THEN ONLY. Only when your government ceases to draw fake statistical data, and conduct the long overdue industrialization of V 2.0 ...
                    1. -5
                      28 February 2019 10: 22
                      And you don’t worry about OUR defense industry, but pray that we would continue to support you ... and don’t redirect these funds to an additional batch of Su-57 or Armat ..
                      1. +5
                        28 February 2019 10: 28
                        Quote: Nasr
                        pray that we continue to support you

                        B-o-o-o-t as he spoke, Yevlampy Spiridonych.
                        Have you felt sorry for the money spent on the DPR and LPR, or are you unsure of the Russian Federation’s commitment to resolving the Ukrainian issue?

                        I am more than sure that the overwhelming majority of Russians will be torn apart for the Donbass. And such "regrets" as you ... The family is not without wassat
                      2. -3
                        28 February 2019 10: 30
                        Don’t spit in the well (in Russia) it’s useful to drink water ...
                      3. +4
                        28 February 2019 10: 32
                        Quote: Nasr
                        And do not worry about OUR defense industry, but pray that we continue to support you.

                        Yes, the main thing is not to talk about Rogozin, Perdyukov and Co. about the Chinese, otherwise they will be upset, and we will remain without the pillars of the state.
                      4. 0
                        28 February 2019 10: 33
                        Quote: tomket
                        Quote: Nasr
                        And do not worry about OUR defense industry, but pray that we continue to support you.

                        Yes, the main thing is not to talk about Rogozin, Perdyukov and Co. about the Chinese, otherwise they will be upset, and we will remain without the pillars of the state.

                        Well, this is what?
                      5. +1
                        28 February 2019 13: 40
                        Quote: Nasr
                        Well, this is what?

                        Moreover, suddenly Rogozin learns that aircraft carriers can be built not only in words and in a rich imagination. Will be upset.
                    2. 0
                      28 February 2019 11: 00
                      well yes. Well, yes ... we went through this. When we do a dozen, nagging will begin again. Like ten is garbage. that's when a hundred. then we'll talk. and 10 little things. and when a hundred. then again, these are ordinary ones, but they need to be transparent with squiggles. etc.
                      Well, even so, things are moving. Slowly, I do not argue. But the technique is on, R&D is taking place. After the pit that was, much better.
              2. +1
                28 February 2019 11: 37
                Quote: Nasr
                I gave the link above, read, a lot will become clear to you ...

                you don’t seem to have read this link, it’s not clearing up for you
              3. +1
                28 February 2019 11: 44
                Quote: Nasr

                No one argues that methane fuel ... and nothing more!

                you also have problems with chemistry — methane, like any hydrocarbon feedstock for the chemical industry — it produces heavy hydrocarbons, in particular ethylene and acetylene, which are used as chemical raw materials.
  4. +7
    28 February 2019 09: 13
    Chinese media reported that on the eve of the PLA Type001A aircraft carrier left the port of Dalian and went into the open sea.
    One cannot but rejoice at the Chinese comrades, who are not comrades at all to us. But nevertheless, respect.
    1. +2
      28 February 2019 09: 26
      Quote: loginovich
      We can’t but rejoice at the Chinese comrades who are not comrades at all to us

      So be it. If only they would become more active in drawing off the military might of our other "non-comrades".
      1. 0
        28 February 2019 15: 07
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        If only they would become more active in drawing off the military might of our other "non-comrades".
  5. +1
    28 February 2019 09: 38
    I envy white envy .... hi
  6. +1
    28 February 2019 09: 41
    My question is, what, China does not experience personnel shortages to ensure this number of ships? If anyone is in the know, please tell us about the training of pilots and technical staff.
    1. 0
      28 February 2019 10: 24
      Quote: Dmitry Bolotsky
      If anyone is in the know, please tell us about the training of pilots and technical staff.

      It seems like last month there was an article on VO that China has to decommission fairly modern aircraft with a good operational resource, such as the Su-30K, which simply stand idle due to the fact that they are quickly replaced by more modern generation 4 ++ aircraft and 5 generations (with a stretch of course). So, everything there is normal with training there.
  7. +2
    28 February 2019 09: 44
    You can be glad for the neighbors, the purposeful and meaningful development of the state allows China to strengthen its position on the world stage.
  8. +5
    28 February 2019 09: 54
    Soviet shipbuilding lives, although not with us. Sad
  9. +2
    28 February 2019 10: 08
    yeah, it started, but after another 5-7 years they will work on Western projects, and in 10 years they’ll start a series of some mutant made from an alloy of different shipbuilding schools, and by this time the remnants of the union’s industry will be finally optimized, and the leader’s layouts will finally be cost like a real ship, and we’ll twist the graphonium in the commercials to the level of youtuber, so then all of us will then be scared.
  10. +4
    28 February 2019 10: 22
    Quote: Dimy4
    Soviet shipbuilding lives, although not with us. Sad

    First you need to return Nikolaev with its shipbuilding .. Donbass with its coals, Kryvyi Rih, Zaporozhye steel .. Mariupol .. A lot of things are needed .. Or all this should be lifted from zero in Russia .. Collect ships in the cold of Severodvinsk!
  11. 0
    28 February 2019 11: 10
    Estimate what there could (judging by a photo). Another confirmation of how bad China is with the environment.
  12. +1
    28 February 2019 11: 39
    Well done The Chinese, what can I say facts on the face, work as an example to our shipbuilders and ministers very well, Well done.
    1. 0
      1 March 2019 16: 23
      today, large ships do not solve anything. Today is the time of small missile ships, today is the time of Zircons, Poseidons, Daggers ... We have no fools in the Moscow Region and have long understood this
      1. 0
        4 March 2019 05: 25
        Large ships do not solve anything, if you do not have nuclear weapons, and if you have one, then any country will heed you and the example of the United States, but if you are a Corn Republic without nuclear weapons, then all your ships and even aircraft carriers are useless, because no one will fight the nuclear Super powers such as Russia, China, unless of course he is a suicide, but at the expense of small ships with supersonic missiles, how they will patrol the ocean, and large ships can do any other operation in the ocean (especially against submarines) without air force cover it is suicide, it was understood both in the USSR and in the USA and China and India understand it (it is written in any military textbook).
  13. 0
    1 March 2019 16: 21
    A useless pile of iron China does not have a school for building navies.
    1. 0
      4 March 2019 05: 40
      Of course there’s no school, they’ve just been building their fleet for more than 60 years and now they have reached the 2nd place in the miter for the tonnage of warships and have bypassed us, and they also reconstructed our old aircraft carrier and built their own aircraft carrier and are building a competitor to the American aircraft carrier like Nimitz with catapults and they build destroyers with a displacement of about 10000 tons in 3 years, and we who build a naval fleet 320 years build a corvette with a displacement of only 3000 tons at the best and one of the oldest shipyards in Russia for almost 3 years! But from your words we have experience in building military fleets (there is a very old truth - everything is known in comparison), until you compare it with competitors, you will understand who is better and who is worse. And at the expense of a useless pile of iron, read above my answer to your colleague.