India moved T-72 tanks to Kashmir, Pakistan responds with Al-Khalid and T-80UD

88
Judging by the recent reports from the Indo-Pakistan border, the conflict between the two powers with nuclear status is far from being resolved.

After the air battles that took place between the air forces of the two countries the day before, mutual shelling had already manifested itself on the ground. So, it became known that the Pakistani army opened fire at the border strip in Kashmir. Indian troops responded with their fire. About which one weapon used, and also about whether there are dead and wounded during this cross-border exchange of fire, not reported.



Against this background, it became known about the transfer of Islamabad and New Delhi tanks to the border - to the area of ​​the conflict.

According to the latest data, India is transferring T-72М1 tanks to Jammu and Kashmir. In the Indian version they are called "Aja." The transfer goes by rail. In addition to several dozen tanks, several army trucks were delivered to the conflict zone on railway platforms.

The author of the video claims that the video was shot literally the other day:


At the same time, Pakistanis are taking their tanks to the border. On the information channel
Gur Khan attacks! announced the transfer to the border of T-80UD tanks (Ukrainian production), "Al-Khalid" and other armored vehicles, including BREM M88, "Type 85-IIAP" (manufactured by the PRC). For reference: to the top of the 2000-x Ukraine put the Pakistan Armed Forces 320 T-80UD tanks.
  • Pakistani Armed Forces
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    28 February 2019 07: 51
    India moved T-72 tanks to Kashmir, Pakistan responds with Al-Khalid and T-80UD
    Well, Pakistan went with the trump cards, and I do not quite understand the step in response from India ... And where are the numerous T-90s and where are the "Arjuns"?
    1. +18
      28 February 2019 07: 55
      Hindus are not Jews, the population is a lot like the old tanks, they are not going to be protected ...
      1. +11
        28 February 2019 08: 37
        Quote: Ugolek
        Hindus are not Jews, the population is a lot like the old tanks, they are not going to be protected ...

        The main thing is that a nuclear conflict would not flare up.
        Scha Indians of their fighting elephants will drive to the border, then the packs cover.
        When the nuclear powers are fighting a little ridiculous, even a world fire would not have flared up.
        1. +8
          28 February 2019 09: 26
          Quote: volot-voin
          When the nuclear powers are fighting a little ridiculous, even a world fire would not have flared up.

          Well, there is no reason for tragedy. Of course there is a chance, but they were before. Nothing, we live for now. On the other hand. If (God forbid, of course) this happens, then there is a chance that someone will be brainwashed overseas and in the old world. They will see what it can lead to, and even decrease in arrogance.
        2. +12
          28 February 2019 09: 37
          What the hell are nuclear, a few dozen bombs with a capacity of up to 10 kt, this is for fear only, and they need to be delivered, plus there are no combat missions that can be solved with nuclear weapons. And the hysteria inflated by the West and picked up by our iksperdy, this is only a hysteria.
          1. +2
            1 March 2019 19: 28
            Quote: K-612-O
            What the hell are nuclear, a few dozen bombs with a capacity of up to 10 kt, this is for fear only, and they need to be delivered, plus there are no combat missions that can be solved with nuclear weapons. And the hysteria inflated by the West and picked up by our iksperdy, this is only a hysteria.

            The conclusion is correct, only introductory, somewhat not the same ... Pakistan, mainly, is sea-based from the only Navy base in Karachi, which the Indians, without much straining, can screw down. India has ballistic ones, which only cities can hit, after which the whole World will howl, and there is nothing to repulse, due to the extreme weakness of Indian air defense - there are still negotiations going on for S-400 ... So none of the sides will use nuclear weapons. No maniacs there ...
        3. +4
          28 February 2019 09: 44
          Quote: volot-voin
          When nuclear powers fight

          They’ve been fighting for 60 years. For now, it was enough to not use vigorous loaves.
          1. 0
            28 February 2019 10: 39
            Because they are stupidly not there, those archaic nuclear weapons that they have are laughing at and only, I understand of course that the club of an ancient person will kill ... and the murdered person will be violet, ultramodern or not! But to call India and Pakistan fully nuclear Powers in the full sense of the word, not very correct!
            1. +3
              28 February 2019 13: 33
              Quote: igorka357
              those archaic nuclear ammunition that they have is laughter and only

              Hiroshima power analogues ... so funny? request
              on the other hand, between us are high mountains and a wide strip of deserts ... so there will not be too much dust ... bully
              1. -1
                1 March 2019 19: 33
                Quote: ser56
                Hiroshima power analogues ... so funny?

                Well? How many died in Hiroshima in the bombing, including those who died from radiation sickness after? How much for the "Nanking Massacre"? And what is the worst weapon?
                1. 0
                  2 March 2019 16: 24
                  Quote: AllXVahhaB
                  And what weapon is worse?

                  human nonsense ... bully
              2. 0
                1 March 2019 21: 56
                Quote: ser56
                Hiroshima power analogues ... so funny?

                It's funny, they’re saying nothing about the global strategic nuclear forces .. And no one is worrying about this conflict, there is nothing there that could harm everyone globally .. Yes, in the best case, 30% will play and what? Everything will settle in the Himalayas and no more ..
                1. 0
                  2 March 2019 16: 26
                  Quote: max702
                  Everything will settle in the Himalayas and no more ..

                  alas, not everything ... but worse than that - the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons will be lowered ... bully
        4. 0
          28 February 2019 11: 12
          Do not worry - this fire will only flare up in Pakistan and India.
        5. 0
          28 February 2019 12: 10
          Quote: volot-voin
          The main thing is that a nuclear conflict would not flare up.

          I very much doubt that Pakistan and India have nuclear missiles. Rather, air bombs, pieces of 300 on each side. Why do I think so ... the Indians had only two missile tests with nuclear weapons and that had a very strange result, but Pakistan has one. I think these two countries have nuclear charges in the form of air bombs, not missiles.
          Although of course, even if these bombs are used with nuclear weapons, the conflict will not become less nuclear than with missiles.
          From time to time, Pakistan and India systematically buttle ... now the 2-0 account is in favor of Pakistan and the Indians, if they do not win back, lose their face. Therefore, I think the conflict will drag on, but I think it won’t be in a nuclear format. The usual push of two neighbors with disputed territories.
        6. -2
          1 March 2019 19: 21
          Quote: volot-voin
          The main thing is that a nuclear conflict would not flare up.

          Will not flare up, nuclear weapons, in this case, this is a weapon of "last strike" ...
          Quote: volot-voin
          even a world fire would not have flared up.

          Why? India is supported by Russia and the United States (oddly enough), China stands behind Pakistan ... Parity ...
      2. +5
        28 February 2019 09: 11
        The tactics of exhausting the enemy with the old ....)))). Joke. With proper crew training, the T-72 is a formidable car!
      3. 0
        1 March 2019 19: 18
        Quote: Ugolek
        Hindus are not Jews, many people

        Pakistan has less, but also not a little, under 200 million already ...
    2. -8
      28 February 2019 08: 02
      And where are the numerous T-90s and where are the Arjunas?

      Scha Indians of their fighting elephants will drive to the border, then the packs cover. laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        28 February 2019 10: 40
        Have you seen how they have fighting cocks on the border changing the guard? Here there really is a cap .. laughing
      3. 0
        28 February 2019 14: 47
        and packs of donkeys armored and stuffed with explosives, such a jihad-donkey
    3. +7
      28 February 2019 08: 07
      so this is an emergency transfer. who was closer and went)
      1. +7
        28 February 2019 08: 11
        Quote: Bull Terrier
        so this is an emergency transfer. who was closer and went)

        Do not make me laugh. Then the question is, why are the units equipped with T-72s the closest to such a "hot spot"?
        1. +9
          28 February 2019 08: 14
          so they have almost 2000 of them and it’s the main one, as it were) 90 half as much. In my opinion, they had 4 quick deployment divisions. in service they are.
          1. +4
            28 February 2019 08: 17
            Quote: Bull Terrier
            so they have almost 2000 pieces and it’s main, as it were) 90 is half as much.

            Yes, about 700, and they have significantly more than in the Russian Armed Forces.
            Under no circumstances will it be a protracted "hot" conflict, and here whoever is stronger will win. And I don’t see something from the Indians yet of the desire to win this fight
            1. +1
              28 February 2019 08: 53
              Below, many write about "elections" and "small and victorious", but maybe in the country of Krishna and Bollywood it is more protracted and inglorious in price? Otherwise, explain the flights of the MiG-21 and the advance to the border of the T-72M1, in the presence of a solid fleet of much more modern technology, otherwise it will not work
              1. +6
                28 February 2019 10: 46
                Quote: skinar
                but maybe in the land of Krishna and Bollywood more protracted and inglorious in value?

                Yes, the Hindus do not need it. The Hindus have everything OK in the economy (the first in the world in terms of growth rates, third in terms of GDP) and there is no demand from the ruling forces for "unbearable unity of all segments of the population."
                In Pakistan, the war is a constant reason for maintaining the extremely high influence of the generals and the presence of paramilitary themes in almost all areas of politics.
            2. +2
              28 February 2019 10: 02
              Well, judging by the number of equipment being transported there, everyone does not see a particularly large conflict
            3. +3
              1 March 2019 19: 37
              Quote: svp67
              ... then whoever turns out to be stronger will win.

              hi, Sergei.
              In this situation, the winner is the one who turns out to be more self-possessed and smarter. Neither Pakistan, with its pale economy, nor India, with its growing economy, needs a war. If it does start, even in the non-nuclear version, the loss of population on both sides will be colossal. In this case, it is necessary to take into account the interest of China, which will certainly take the side of Pakistan, since it has long-standing "problems" with India. Russia needs to try to bring its opponents to the negotiating table and prevent war. Something is being done by our Foreign Ministry - Pakistan has already agreed to our mediation, it is up to India to decide.
              1. +1
                2 March 2019 04: 12
                Quote: Lelek
                In this situation, the one who will be more seasoned and smarter will win.

                As for the smarter, this does not seem to apply to India. Having "world-class IT workers", they could not determine exactly the coordinates of the "terrorist" camps and enter them into the bomb homing heads or did not want to, then there is a question for the Indian counterintelligence agencies
                1. +1
                  2 March 2019 11: 11
                  Quote: svp67
                  At the expense of smarter, this does not seem to be the case for India. With "world-class IT workers" ...


                  I mean "smarter" politically. Sometimes winking and smiling is much more productive than twirling a revolver drum at the temple of your vi-za-vi. Yes
                  1. +1
                    2 March 2019 15: 07
                    Quote: Lelek
                    Sometimes wink
                    You will "blink" and miss the first shot
                    1. +1
                      2 March 2019 18: 35
                      Quote: svp67
                      You will "blink" and miss the first shot

                      Well, that's also a possible option. Who does not take risks, he does not drink "Livizovsky" pepper. By the way, we still manage to "get along" with the opposing sides, the other day Shoigu was negotiating with the Indian Ministry of Defense. Probably for the purpose of calming and calling for the tabletop of negotiations. Let's see what time will tell.
    4. +2
      28 February 2019 08: 12
      Well, Pakistan went with trump cards, and I do not quite understand the step in response from India.

      Trump cards have not yet been used by anyone, that's how they start and the full scribe wakes up ........
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 08: 15
        Quote: spektr9
        Trump cards have not yet been used by anyone, that's how they start and the full scribe wakes up ........

        There are "trump cards" in every type and branch of the armed forces, in this case the tank models from the Pakistani side are exactly that. Could have sent the old T-59
        1. 0
          28 February 2019 08: 54
          Quote: svp67
          Then the question is, why were the units equipped with T-72s the closest to such a "hot spot"?

          Or maybe this is a military trick?
          During the day, T-72 cameras are brought up, and at night, the elite T-90s are driven away to the nearest jungle.
          They are digging trenches demonstratively and preparing for defense, while they themselves are preparing to attack decisively?
          1. +2
            28 February 2019 08: 57
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            Or maybe this is a military trick?

            Maybe this can be. It is only very difficult to do this, under the current control system, any movements of large masses of troops will be opened in a timely manner.
            1. +2
              28 February 2019 09: 16
              It is clear that it is very difficult.
              But here you need to understand that the military always act according to templates /// that they hone while studying in academies and during exercises ///. There are not so many of them, these very "templates" and the enemy often guesses roughly how the enemy will act. But these patterns can be applied in different sequences and on different sectors of the front, and this is how tactical surprise is achieved. By all accounts, the packs will be confident that the Indians will deliver a powerful blow. But where exactly such a blow will be struck --- there is always a chance to confuse the enemy, by creating false headquarters, demonstrative transfer /// as in our case ///, by the mode of activity on the front line and much more.
    5. +1
      1 March 2019 18: 17
      Quote: svp67
      ... And where are the numerous T-90s and where are the Arjunas?

      First, brushwood is thrown into the firebox ...
      Grishkovets has a wonderful moment in his solo show "Dreadnoughts"
      -----------------------
      No, of course, at first they made many more dreadnoughts and ships less formidable than dreadnought ones. We’ve done a lot, many kinds of military vehicles ... well, there, tanks, planes ... But the dreadnoughts were, of course ... the most interesting gizmos. And for all this, they started a war.

      Of course, there were many significant reasons for the war and incredibly complex intricacies and political twists ... But the desire and opportunity to experience dreadnought in business was not the last reason, and most importantly very understandable. Well, that is, humanly understandable. Much more understandable than all these political twists.

      And the war began. Many countries took part in it, many generals, many people whose names were lost ... But I am interested in dreadnoughts.

      The war began, it began both on land and at sea. But the queue did not immediately reach the dreadnoughts. Both England and Germany were afraid to launch such magnificent and terribly expensive ships. But most importantly, no one has ever used anything like this, and no one knew what to do with these giants. Well, they swim fast, well, they shoot far, well, huge ... And then what? And suddenly some dreadnought stumbles upon some vulgar, cheap and small mine. And then what? And ... the Dreadnoughts stood at their bases, and the war began. And went without them ...

      And this is humanly very understandable. For example, you go around the market, and you see how some seller lays apples, good, tight apples. He wipes them, each with a cloth, and lays them out. And then you will see such apples, and even imagine how you bite your teeth into them, and they crunch, and even hiss. And you feel how the juice fills your mouth, and it makes your mouth turn sour ... And you buy these apples, and think about how you will eat them ... But you bring them home, and there in the vase there are several slightly dusty, wrinkled apples, which you bought once, and you think - well, do not throw them away, you must first get them. And from the fact that they are no longer fresh and tasteless, you eat them for a long time, and during this time the fresh ones got dusty and wrinkled ... And you never manage to eat good apples!
      -----------------------
      (Looped here - https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=11141&p=2)
    6. 0
      1 March 2019 19: 39
      Why substitute the most efficient forces under the first and most powerful strike? There are a lot of T72s and it’s not a pity, and after the first stage of battles you can throw a reserve in the form of T90s to attack to develop successes or to parry enemy attacks. And it is right. Most importantly, it says that Indians take everything seriously and take into account the possibility of war.
  2. -1
    28 February 2019 07: 56
    Well, exactly according to V.S. Vysotsky.
    1. 0
      28 February 2019 10: 57
      Quote: Lamatinets
      Well, exactly according to V.S. Vysotsky.

      Fisher destroys the defense / The old Indian at the moment / This reminds me a lot / The Indo-Pakistani incident is not yet visible. The Hindus made certain conclusions from that war long ago, and the British tactical "school" was replaced by the post-war Soviet one.
      Yasenpen, they are not at the forefront of military science (the Sikhs, who make up the bulk of the officers of the Indian army, have never shone with their mental agility), but they are quite normally ready for the "last war."
  3. -2
    28 February 2019 08: 02
    Of course, seventy-second in authority, but as far as it was possible to consider no protection without special gadgets
  4. +7
    28 February 2019 08: 06
    Rather than pandering to various revolutions and raids "for democracy" of the United States and its subjects ... The UN and the world community urgently (until it comes to the exchange of nuclear notes of protest) to stop the conflict ... otherwise it could provoke a local nuclear war with all the consequences for the WORLD on Earth with consequences ...
    And there is also the danger of launching missiles from nuclear war in the direction of third countries ... and provoking a global exchange of attacks ...
    Both countries are very unsuccessful for the possession of nuclear weapons ... for some, death is the beginning of a new life in the development chain ... for others, there is an eternal thrill in paradise with the guri ... this is the psychology of people responsible for using weapons ...
    1. 0
      1 March 2019 08: 33
      plus is the lack of modern Jaustraits and rocket launchers .. there are air bombs of the 1945-50 level ..
  5. +6
    28 February 2019 08: 09
    And the striped-eared sit and rub their palms am They are probably terribly interested to look at the nuclear conflict, recently there have been too many stuffing in the media on this subject. Yes
  6. +2
    28 February 2019 08: 11
    Conflict can erupt seriously! It would be necessary to somehow cool the fighting spirit of the parties.
    1. -2
      28 February 2019 11: 05
      Tashkent is no longer ours.
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 11: 21
        Quote: Lamatinets
        Tashkent is no longer ours.

        This is what?
        1. +1
          28 February 2019 12: 35
          Probably about the Indo-Pakistani negotiations in Tashkent in 1965.
    2. +2
      28 February 2019 11: 13
      Send a batch of cold beer to both of them at the border - it may cool down.
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 11: 20
        Quote: Vadim237
        Send a batch of cold beer

        Good suggestion laughing
  7. -8
    28 February 2019 08: 11
    Some distant non-smart people are sitting in the government of India. Why exacerbate the conflict even more? There the situation escalated, after the terrorist attack which Pakistan was accused of (which allegedly supports terrorists) and instead of convening a UN Security Council meeting to conduct an official investigation of this incident, India is aggravating .... what can they achieve? Well, they will drive the army to the border, maybe there will be a ground conflict with the use of conventional weapons, and after all in the end it will not work, there will be losses on both sides, it will not work to punish the perpetrators (if the information is true), the Indian Armed Forces will not they’ll reach, and local skirmishes will not change the big picture .... in general xs what goals does India pursue this and what ultimately wants to achieve. The only thing that comes to mind is an attempt to squeeze the land from Pakistan, i.e. they have a territorial conflict. But taking into account the nuclear weapons in Pakistan and the army, you should not say so, such an option is unlikely, in general, the stupidity of the leadership of India is visible (IMHO).
    1. +3
      28 February 2019 08: 21
      Quote: Aleksandr21
      The only thing that comes to mind is an attempt to squeeze the land from Pakistan, i.e. they have a territorial conflict.

      they have not only a territorial conflict, but also a religious one, and lemongrasses are to blame for everything ...
      1. +7
        28 February 2019 08: 32
        Quote: PSih2097
        they have not only a territorial conflict, but also a religious one, and lemongrasses are to blame for everything ...

        this is obvious .... wherever you spit, where the conflict is, there the Aglitz dog, at one time, rummaged.
        1. +8
          28 February 2019 08: 55
          there aglitskaya dog, at one time, rummaged.
          - let's not talk straight rummaged, but shit ... hi
          1. +3
            28 February 2019 09: 14
            Vernyak sho both! Because how to dig both, never scoop up.
      2. 0
        28 February 2019 12: 38
        India and its Muslims are full, under 200 million.
    2. +2
      28 February 2019 08: 50
      And what's the point at the UN? This organization has not solved anything for a long time. And this time will not solve anything. Unless the United States reports explicit support for one of the parties. Then they can make some decision, but they will not fulfill it.
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 09: 15
        Obvious, unbelievable ..... but they haven’t come up with anything else.
    3. +1
      28 February 2019 09: 07
      Quote: Aleksandr21
      the stupidity of the leadership of India is visible (IMHO).

      And the same thing that the leadership of Israel, for example, is not visible? The transfer of tanks is not yet battles with the loss of equipment and personnel. It is possible that they are frightening: look, we have already moved in your direction, it’s better to give up without a fight, we are an order of magnitude more. On the other hand, if anything, then some troops are already at hand.
      Honestly, according to the information that is available, it seems that the leadership of the Indian Air Force is inadequate. Especially on the second flight. But it’s better not to judge anyone now, but to wait for reliable information.
  8. -11
    28 February 2019 08: 26
    vryatli Pakistanis will use nuclear weapons, because the breeze can blow in the direction of "great and immense" Israel, but there you just need that tiny cloud and now over Tel Aviv the black ash of radiation is falling beautifully, circling; that's why the sons of a certain david said no vigorous bombs to their Pakistani animals
    1. +1
      28 February 2019 08: 52
      Exactly. Moreover, the breeze can also inflate to itself. It’s stupid to hit with a nuclear weapon next door, but you’ll hit yourself. Obviously there are common bodies of water and others ... Plus, they have a dispute over the territory, each of them considers it his own, they won’t beat it.
  9. +2
    28 February 2019 08: 31
    Where is there, in India, what election campaign is planned?
    The authorities are the same everywhere, start a small victorious war before the elections, like a textbook .... watered technology, as they say now.
    Victories may not be, but they will be ringing in all the media.
    However, the reason for the act is really serious !!! Only these are mistakes, the weak work of special services, anti-terror units .... but this is not comme il faut.
    The election however!
    1. +1
      28 February 2019 12: 40
      In India, the army does not play an independent political role. It is completely controlled by the government. Unlike Pakistan, in all the years of independence, there has not been a single attempt at a military coup in India.
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 13: 33
        In any case, the army also fulfills the political wishes of the ruling political leadership.
        This is not news, nor news, the army often replaces the political leadership in a direct and figurative sense!
        Is this a good or bad option ??? everywhere in different ways .... it’s only obvious that the army, as a structure clearly structured, clearly operating and observing the hierarchy of subordination, is inclined to observe more order in everything.
  10. 0
    28 February 2019 08: 39
    We need to supply weapons to both. We’ve gotten enough ....
    1. +2
      28 February 2019 08: 49
      Yeah! Directly at the border of the Indian and Pakistani waters, open a floating shop and declare a ceasefire in this region - let them grab on both sides, pack up ...
      carry out promotions ...
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 08: 59
        Yes, anything. Money doesn't smell. In wars, everyone is welded. And if the suckers want to fight .....
    2. -2
      28 February 2019 08: 54
      Moreover, at least two different suppliers can weld. After all, whoever supplies one side will not be able to deliver the second.
      1. -1
        28 February 2019 09: 00
        Oh, you didn't read it carefully! "Right on the border and with a water truce .."
    3. +1
      28 February 2019 08: 56
      And as a result of losing both good fool
    4. -1
      28 February 2019 09: 13
      Do not have time.
      Quote: ROBIN-SON
      We need to supply weapons to both. We’ve gotten enough ....

      While the contracts are signed, while we deliver, while we train ... A couple more conflicts between them can take place. Here, if you're lucky, then send some ammunition, and then the probability is small.
      1. 0
        28 February 2019 11: 01
        So you can arrange a sale, they will come buy. And shipment at own expense ... Quickly and without hemorrhoids ...
  11. 0
    28 February 2019 09: 06
    Are they really going to fight? Is there someone who can stop these idiots before everything comes to fatal consequences? Lavrov - bro, this conflict is not in our favor, why are we silent?
    1. +1
      28 February 2019 09: 14
      Half the world is already in local conflicts. So these did not agree, they decided to aggravate. Why should we separate them? This is their business. Pakistan in Afghanistan badly ruined us. That Indians would help, at the same time and sell weapons technology. It seems to me that one should not worry about nuclear weapons, they will not shoot at each other, but they will fall into themselves in the end.
    2. +3
      28 February 2019 09: 51
      Lavrov said that the guys are calmer, there is diplomacy, negotiations. The Chinese said that they are for de-escalation and diplomatic efforts. Turkey (friend of the Packs) - said that the right to inviolability of the territory of Pakistan is sacred and India made a mistake by violating this. At the same time, they called for diplomatic efforts to resolve the situation (although Turkish Aerospace Industries there most likely already moves orders to Pakistan to be the first to ship 30 T-129 for 1,5 billion and UAVs ordered).
  12. +4
    28 February 2019 09: 12
    Judging by recent reports from the Indo-Pakistani border, the conflict between the two powers with nuclear status is far from permission.

    Well, Indians do not get used to it ....
  13. 0
    28 February 2019 09: 30
    that’s the question of the dough and it can be resolved: Ukraine can overtake tanks, it sells them to packs, India itself.
  14. +1
    28 February 2019 09: 50
    Clintonoids and some elites in Israel will receive a large bream for organizing this conflict from global elites. It was not your garden. We are waiting for the catch phrase from Trump-You are FIRED! A surprise will be unexpectedly unpleasant. Wrap around ...
  15. 0
    28 February 2019 09: 57
    For a long time already at the dance battle they would have found out who dances better than that and Kashmir. Our "T-XX", of course, maneuverable, but they do not convey all the subtleties of the dance.
  16. -2
    28 February 2019 10: 18
    Now is the time for the United States to admonish, especially since Pakistan itself turned to them for help. Help Pakistan in this conflict with the destruction of the T-72. Then reconcile everyone, release a devastating article and eventually offer India their tanks or tanks of the allies (Germany, France).
  17. +2
    28 February 2019 10: 50
    even if a nuclear stick is used a couple of times. and even if there will be no consequences. then it will be a disaster. Not for them. but for the world. Some in the world will think. but that we are sitting. But you can ... Since the 2nd World War was not applied. and begin to throw tactical charges wherever they want.
  18. Quote: hto tama
    And the striped-eared sit and rub their palms am They are probably terribly interested to look at the nuclear conflict, recently there have been too many stuffing in the media on this subject. Yes

    All who sell weapons to these countries are rubbing:
    "India and Pakistan are fighting with weapons purchased in Russia, Izvestia writes. During the air strike on the night of February 26-27, India used Su-30MKI fighters, Il-78MKI tankers and Phalcon flying radars based on the Il-76. The Chinese JF-17 fighters used by Pakistan are equipped with Russian components, such as RD-93 engines and air cannons. In addition, Pakistan also has an Il-78. India has almost 140 Mi-17V-5 helicopters, Pakistan has about 20 Mi- 171 and four Mi-35s. Russia also supplied India with BrahMos supersonic anti-ship missiles and KAB-500S-E guided bombs. "
  19. -3
    28 February 2019 14: 58
    Given that India and Pakistan do not have enough nuclear weapons for global armageddon (India has about 100 10-50Kt warheads, Pakistan has less), there is no need to be afraid of a nuclear disaster. It's just that you cannot see from overseas where the ears of the conflict got out ...
  20. +1
    28 February 2019 16: 19
    Quote: skinar
    Below, many write about "elections" and "small and victorious", but maybe in the country of Krishna and Bollywood it is more protracted and inglorious in price? Otherwise, explain the flights of the MiG-21 and the advance to the border of the T-72M1, in the presence of a solid fleet of much more modern technology, otherwise it will not work

    It has long been known that the cheapest way to dispose of obsolete weapons is to put them into battle. True, a problem arises - combat vehicles often die along with crews, but perhaps in India this is not considered such a problem, with their demographic situation.
  21. +1
    1 March 2019 17: 10
    If you look at the root, then Pakistan, as a public entity in this region - extra link! The Afghans themselves (the initiates), when the Soviet troops were brought in in December 1979, believed that the very introduction of troops into the DRA was a veil, and the Union’s main goal was to solve the problem - to eliminate the extra option of Pakistan at the India-DRA link! And there wasn’t a nuclear weapon in Pakistan in 1979! Recall: The Afghan campaign of the Red Army in 1929, which was a special operation aimed at supporting the ousted king of Afghanistan, Amanullah Khan.
    From what the Soviet leadership turned out to be so politically shortsighted in 1979, the Roar of the Tribunal of the restored New, Soviet RSFSR will still be sorted out.
    But what if you replay the region ??? Trying to negotiate India with Afghanistan? Turkeys have a real goal, and this is no longer Kashmir! In Afghanistan, internal processes are shaken up - The army, which is passive due to intra-tribal and ethnic strife, receives the object of attack - in the form of an external enemy, Pakistan and the goal: liberation from slavery of the Pashtun brothers and Tajiks "held" by evil Pakistanis on their territory to receive countless humanitarian aid the same Pakistan? And along the way, you can solve the problems with the pan-Islamist formations in the region and stop them !!!
    I believe that such tasks are beyond the power of the capitalist RF. Wimps! They ceased to fly into space even there! Weakness ...
    With Bolshevik greetings! For Our Soviet Motherland!
  22. 0
    2 March 2019 15: 18
    Quote: AllXVahhaB
    Quote: ser56
    Hiroshima power analogues ... so funny?

    Well? How many died in Hiroshima in the bombing, including those who died from radiation sickness after? How much for the "Nanking Massacre"? And what is the worst weapon?

    After the Nanjing massacre, there was no radioactive contamination of the area for 50 years, no rodents and no children were born!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"