From the history of the development of artillery acoustics. H. 2

22 482 15
As noted, the impetus for the use of sound reconnaissance was the Russo-Japanese War. Artillery acquired the ability to shoot at long distances, at invisible targets. At the same time, artillery became invisible to the enemy. That's when the idea came to use sound for reconnaissance of firing guns and for shooting at them. True, during the Russo-Japanese War, no methods or techniques for determining the location of firing guns by sound were developed. However, some officers had already used the principle of the difference in the speed of light and sound. Noticing the gleam of a shot from a gun behind the closure, the observer determined the time it took for the sound to reach him - and judged the distance based on the measured time. Later, as a stopwatch-rangefinder, Boulanger proposed the first simple sound-measuring device based on this principle and allowing one to automatically obtain an approximate value of the range to a gun (Aparin A. A. Sound measurement. Voenizdat, 1931. P. 6.).

A more sophisticated and independent of optical surveillance, the proposal of the Russian officer N. A. Benoit 1909, appeared, which allows to determine the location of enemy batteries by the sound of a shot.




Artillery sound reconnaissance. M., 1993.

In foreign armies, such proposals appeared only at the beginning of the First World War 1914 - 1918. (Esclangon - in France, Paris - in England). In the work already cited Barsukov, we can read the following: “Experiments of the use of sound in Russian artillery arose in 3 - 4 year before the start of World War I, that is, earlier than anywhere else in foreign artillery. Before the war with these instruments (sound-measuring instruments), sound-measuring teams were formed and sent to the theater of war ”(Barsukov, T. I. I, S. 95.)

According to participants of the first experiments using sound intelligence in the 1914 - 1918 war, one of these teams went to the front in August 1914. The team consisting of 6 people first tried to turn around on the Lublin front, participating in the battles near the villages of Bykovo and Golenzovo - but before the end of the battle did not have time to turn around. But the second time, in the battles on the Vistula near the town of Kamen (September 1914), the team turned around and spotted three enemy batteries.

Nevertheless, although already at the beginning of the 1914 campaign, sound reconnaissance teams operated in the Russian army, their work was experienced until the very end of the war. Sound reconnaissance did not come out of the test stage, which was partly due to the imperfection of the material part: the sound stations available in 1916 in the Russian army: 1) VL (named after the designers Volodkevich and Zheltov) and 2) were not the inventor of Levin quite satisfactory. It should be noted that these two stations already at that time had a graphic record, therefore they provided documentation, as opposed to the third station available to the troops - chronographic. The latter (Benoit station) had an imperfect sound receiver - and the results of its work were ineffective. Unfortunately, the work of the first two stations almost did not preserve information.

Already at the end of 1917, the unsatisfactory nature of the organization of detachments of artillery observation stations became clear (as the sonometric detachments were called by that time) and the ineffectiveness of finding them on the fronts - as a result, they had to go to Tsarskoye Selo, to a reserve Heavy brigade - to be reorganized into new ones grounds.

At the same time, the Russian artillerymen widely used (for example, during the 1916 Offensive) the above-mentioned sound-light method of determining the range - for the production of artillery firing.

That is in short story sound reconnaissance in the Russian army until the end of 1917

Some information about the use of sound intelligence in the French army is found only at the beginning of 1915, and in the German army - even later. Abroad, as in Russia, at the beginning of the war, they clearly underestimated the role of this powerful tool.

This is what Academician Eksklangon, who was involved in sound measurement work in 1915, writes about this: “One general answered me that, in his opinion, this question has no practical significance.” And in another case: “In the bureau of the military ministry I was received by his chief, who was attentive to the proposal with kindness, but also skeptical. The young captains present were even ironic. ”

In the German army at the beginning of the war, the view was also dominant that only aerial reconnaissance and a preferential study of aerial photographs provided basic information for the use of artillery. By the end of the war, this view had changed radically. So, one officer, the German Army specialist, noted that in 1918, the use of a division without light and sound reconnaissance was unthinkable. The corresponding means gained recognition in foreign armies - and by the end of the war, sound-reconnaissance intelligence became one of the main assets of the enemy's artillery reconnaissance.

As an illustration, we cite a number of data characterizing the work of sonometric reconnaissance at the end of the war of 1914 - 1918. So, for example, in the 2nd French Army for the period from June 22 to August 13, 1918, from a stable front, of the 159 main positions of the enemy were determined: sound metering - 45 positions (or 28%); light measurement - 54 positions (or 34%); aviation - 60 positions (or 38%).

In the 1 of the French army for the period from April 7 to 8 in August, 1918 g was determined by soundometric intelligence 974 targets, photometric - 794 targets. These goals were identified with errors: when the distance to 50 meters was for 59% sound measurement and 34% photometry, when the distance from 50 to 100 meters was used for 34% sound metric and 48% photometry, and for distances above 100 meters - for 7% sound metric and light metering 18%.

And finally, the 4th French Army, in the period from July 18 to July 31, 1918, in the areas of the 21st and 8th Corps, received the following results for determining the location of targets: sound measurement - 367 targets; light measurement - 177 targets; tethered balloons - 25 targets; aviation - 56 targets; other means - 2 targets.

From the above material it can be seen that by the end of the First World War, sound reconnaissance came in first place in terms of the number of designated targets and in accuracy of work, compared to all other types of artillery reconnaissance. In particular, the French sound meters discovered the location of German ultra-long-range guns (“long Berthas”), who were firing on Paris.


Installation of the Paris cannon on the railway platform

However, there was so much skepticism about the work of sound specialists in the army circles that only after the end of the war the correctness of the information received by sound meters regarding the location of these long-range guns was confirmed.

The ending should ...
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    24 February 2019 08: 23
    A little-known and all the more interesting review of artillery sonometry PMV.
    The Russian army was at the forefront of the processes, well
    1. +5
      24 February 2019 08: 46
      Quote: Albatroz
      A little-known and all the more interesting review of artillery sonometry PMV.

      With exemptions.
      The technologies used by Russia's allies in the Entente were also originally from Russia.
      Which allowed the Bolsheviks to destroy their developer together with his wife. On charges of "espionage"
      1. 0
        28 September 2019 14: 17
        Quote: Spade
        The technologies used by Russia's allies in the Entente were also originally from Russia.
        Which allowed the Bolsheviks to destroy their developer together with his wife. On charges of "espionage"
        What kind of "developer with wife"? The article contains 4 surnames: Benoit, Volodkevich, Zheltov and Levin.
        Or maybe the developer was an ardent, but hidden anti-Soviet, i.e. Russophobe, when instead of working for the good of the Russians, he was wrecking or was an active opponent of the population of his own country during the Civil years?
        And then repressed a lot of different trash ...
  2. +6
    24 February 2019 09: 03
    Wonderful article. The main thing is on the subject of the site. Informative.
    On my own behalf, for the former gunners: My uncle - "Vanka-platoon" in the Second World War, having heard the words from the song - "... they carry guns on cables" - came into a state of light passion (he did not differ in subtlety of feelings) and explained that this happens rarely and when it happens. It seems to me that such small details are very interesting to the reader. Sorry for the diversion from the topic of the article.
  3. +7
    24 February 2019 09: 04
    It was probably easier to pinpoint a Paris gun than guns of smaller calibers
    Although it was not disguised as soon as possible, including with the help of sounds from other specially selected guns.
    In general, many things on the subject of legs grow from the First World War. The Allies, before one of the tank offensives, masked the sounds from the tanks concentrated to the starting line of the aircraft by the airborne muzzle, again flying for the purpose of masking
  4. +5
    24 February 2019 10: 49
    Interesting article. I look forward to continuing. The problem is also in the refraction of a sound wave in the atmosphere, that is, a meteorological service is needed that provides an on-line temperature profile by altitude, and all this above the enemy’s territory. Naturally, without it, the accuracy of determining the location of the gun will be low.
    1. +1
      24 February 2019 14: 30
      Quote: Aviator_
      that is, a meteorological service is needed that gives an on-line temperature profile by altitude

      She is.
      1. 0
        24 February 2019 16: 36
        Starting with WWII - undoubtedly, such a service was organized.
        1. +1
          24 February 2019 16: 58
          It depends on who and where. For example, Russian coastal artillery took into account meteo since the 19th century. Field-no.
          Unlike German or French. Where specialized field weather stations and sounding posts already existed.
          1. 0
            24 February 2019 17: 53
            You can try to take into account. There were no direct measurements over the entire distance of the projectile, neither the Germans nor the French. The situation is saved only by the fact that atmospheric temperature inhomogeneities usually have a characteristic size of the order of 10 km or more, but when they are, it is possible to calculate the location of the gun from weather measurements over its territory. Naturally, the case of the location of the atmospheric front between the place of the shot and the place of impact of the shell is not considered.
            1. +1
              24 February 2019 18: 11
              Quote: Aviator_
              There were no direct measurements over the entire distance of the projectile, neither the Germans nor the French

              It is not necessary. Just a point is measured. temperature, wind speed and direction, pressure. It's enough.
  5. +2
    24 February 2019 13: 40
    Quote: Brutan
    as soon as they did not mask it, including with the help of sounds from other specially selected guns.

    You have noticed it correctly! As soon as a "sword" appears, people immediately "think" about a "shield". With the advent of sound (light) reconnaissance and the corresponding means, means and methods of counteracting detection are being developed... You mentioned one of the methods of counteraction (camouflaging a "main caliber" shot with shots from other guns...), and I wanted to tell you a story I once "heard" from the "category" of "both funny and sad". They came up with a "cunning" additive to gunpowder to "extinguish" the flashes of shots during night artillery fire... But, apparently, they did not really explain to the gunners "what is how much and for what..."; and the gunners could decide that they were being "pulled all over their heads" for nothing... "pulled the wool over their eyes..."! In short, having fired at night and having decided that everything was fine... they could fire during the day, they immediately carried out their daytime intention! After the very first shots, the artillery positions were enveloped clouds of smoke! It's all about the properties of the "additive"... Maybe it's a "story", but I've "heard" it... request
    1. +2
      24 February 2019 14: 14
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      But, apparently, they didn’t really explain to the artillerymen "what for how much and for what ..."; and the gunners could decide that for nothing they were "powdered with brains" ... "they were putting noodles on their ears ..."! In short, after shooting at night and deciding that everything is normal ... you can shoot during the day, we immediately realized our daytime intention! After the very first shots, the artillery positions were enveloped in clouds of smoke! It's all about the properties of the "additive" ... Maybe it's a "bike", but I had to "hear" ...

      Almost a bike.
      Such compositions were really used, but in most cases they could be removed from the charge before firing, well, or to prevent their regular "operation"
      Their daily use was associated either with erroneous actions (they stupidly forgot to extract) For unitars, also with the lack of the ability to shoot other shells (if it cannot be altered) or time for alteration, which required a rather complicated and long procedure for unscrewing the capsule sleeve and removing the powder "adapters "through it.
      1. 0
        24 February 2019 16: 51
        So (at least, "theoretically" ...) it could still be? wink
        1. +3
          24 February 2019 17: 08
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          So (at least, "theoretically" ...) it could still be?

          In the sense of "the brains powder" - rather not.
          But the fact that the unmasking occurred for one reason or another, with the highest probability. Either they simply forgot to pull it out, or there was no technical possibility to do it, or there was no time for it.