Military Review

Anatoly Wasserman: Council for nationalities. Diversity needs unity

88
Anatoly Wasserman: Council for nationalities. Diversity needs unity

The Presidential Council for Nationalities is a new thing. In the same sense in which he used this word, Jacques Pesce — the writer of memoirs on behalf of Mademoiselle Rosa Bertin, the personal dressmaker of Queen Marie Antoinette. According to court etiquette, the queen had to appear in public each time in a new outfit. According to Pesce, once Berten didn’t have time to create another masterpiece and hastily reworked something from the royal wardrobe, and a reminder of etiquette was countered by the “New - well forgotten old”.

Structures on affairs of nationalities in the domestic government have existed since time immemorial. I don’t dare to understand the changeable management system of pre-revolutionary times, let me remind you only: in the first Soviet government, the people's commissariat for national affairs acted, created and headed it (concurrently with many other useful affairs) Joseph Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili. True, the 1923.07.07 Commissariat was abolished, but only because its duties were taken over by an elected body - the Central Executive Committee of the Councils of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics established by 1922.12.30.

By the way, Dzhugashvili himself objected to the establishment of the Union in the form of a confederation, preferring to pour all the fragments of the Russian empire into the united Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. Later experience justified his point of view: the collapse of the Soviet Union happened formally on the basis of the right of the Union republics to self-determination.

True, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, insisting on the confederative structure of the post-imperial country, had its reasons: The civil war contributed to the formation of freemen on the ground, wishing to preserve their privileges in peacetime.

Let us recall at least some (alas, I remember far from all) the demands of the Georgian national-communists: to leave in Georgia all taxes collected in it, but to grant it the right to subsidize it from the Union budget as needed; allow the Georgian government, at its own discretion, to deport any citizen of the USSR outside the republic and to dissolve mixed marriages; automatically deprive Georgian citizenship of a Georgian woman who married a person of a different nationality. Mikael Nikolozovich Saakashvili is only creatively developing some - far from everything - traditions of his predecessors.

A multinational empire is always experiencing difficulties that are absent in a mono-national kingdom. But she has much more opportunities. Not to mention the benefits of cross-fertilization of diverse cultures, let me remind you of the purely economic side of things. The division of labor increases its productivity. The larger and more diverse the society, the greater the division of labor in it, the more every citizen can do for others and receive from others.

True, there are many possible formats of multinationality. However, all of them are distributed between two extremes - colonial and continental. Moreover, intermediate variants rather quickly evolve to one of these extremes.

In the colonial empire, the number of representatives of the metropolis is negligible compared with the number of inhabitants of the distant (most often overseas) colony. The help is almost impossible: until the second half of the nineteenth century, the message to the metropolis about the possibility of rebellion often lasted several weeks, and the collection and sending of reinforcements took months. In such conditions, the only way to keep the colony in submission - continuous cruel suppression. Any opportunity to even think about disobedience is destroyed (along with its carrier) - not to mention taking control in place of colonial administrators.

In a continental empire, nations have long been living side by side and for centuries have been developing mutually acceptable formats of coexistence. Inevitable besperelschikov - like the Basques or Chechens - most often by joint efforts put pressure on all the neighbors, gradually accustoming them to a way of life that is safe for others. The tasks of the imperial administration are to organize the interaction of regions distant from each other and to maintain order so that the peoples do not divert themselves from the cause to the fight against lawlessness.

Often I give an example of the distinction between the two types of empires. When the top conspiracy forced Nicholas II Alexandrovich Romanov to abdicate the Russian throne - an exemplary continental - empire at the height of the First World War (and even when victory with the coveted Black Sea straits loomed as a trophy), the Emperor was only two generals from cavalry (which corresponds to the current general of the army and the marshal of the armed forces): the German Lutheran German Fyodor Arturovich, Count Keller, and the Armenian Azerbaijani Mus Ulmanin Huseyn Kelbalievich Khan Nakhichevan. In the same war in the allied Russian British and French - exemplary colonial - empires, even a colonel of foreigners was unthinkable. But the Basques and Bretons in France, the Welsh and the Scots in England - the people who joined in the format of continental empires - were perceived as their own, used almost equal opportunities.

Now we are diligently pushed onto the path of the colonial empire. Let us recall at least how often (as Andrei Ilyich Fursov put it) SMRAD - mass media advertising, agitation, misinformation - scornful names of representatives of ethnic groups, whose native lands were cut off from Russia in the devastating 1991, flash. Yes, and the ethnic diversity of the current Russian Federation was awarded many equally scornful nicknames. In Soviet times, such behavior of a journalist was impossible not only because of strict censorship, but also thanks to decades of education and self-education. And not only the Soviet. In imperial times, too, was the inadmissibility of driving wedges along ethnic joints.

In addition, the growth of contradictions within the Russian Federation scares other nations and slows the revival of our united Russia in all its scope and diversity. So, such insults - not to mention shouts like “Stop feeding the Caucasus”, deceitful not only politically but also economically - are beaten not only in our present calm, but in our upcoming flourishing.

Hence the immediate priorities of the current version of managing the country's multicolor: restoring mutual respect; creating a system of suppression of provocations; ensuring the equality of all national customs (even Russian, even Chechen, or even Udmurt), to the extent that they do not infringe upon the legitimate and equal interests of the bearers of other customs; the use of the capabilities of each group in the interests of all the people The main addressees of these tasks are also obvious: the media (they will have to be largely restored from the current SMRAD, so the task will inevitably affect many government agencies); law enforcement and the justice system; coordinators of economic activities, who will encourage the creation of enterprises in each region that rely as much as possible on local identity.

It is clear that in the course of the revival - and even more so of development - of the country, the inevitable emergence of new causes for conflicts. The Council for National Affairs will have to constantly monitor that the reasons did not turn into causes. To do this, it is necessary not only to study the current situation, but also to quickly make new forecasts. The list of tasks given by me is inevitably and quickly replenished. But you have to start somewhere! I have long been guided by the motto: “while no one is doing, nothing is being done”. I think this applies to the authorities.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.odnako.org
88 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Middle-brother
    Middle-brother 15 June 2012 12: 24
    +32
    "SMRAD - mass advertising, agitation, disinformation" is an excellent definition. Article plus, Wasserman. as always, great.
    1. Bunny
      Bunny 15 June 2012 13: 17
      +24
      Wasserman expresses obvious things, so obvious that officials simply do not see them! And they will not see! They live a self-sufficient life with us. Is it good, satisfying, to set off something?!.
      I still can’t understand, we’re taking some fools as officials, or are they fooling around there, on the spot? .. By the principle; was a man - he became an official.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 15 June 2012 13: 48
        +20
        You vote for the worst - look, a year later the boar sits on the TV, mugging that ass, it still teaches me how to live, you bastard!

        (BROTHER 2)
        1. Churchill
          Churchill 15 June 2012 14: 16
          +17
          vorobey,
          And the funniest thing is that it teaches that which Tsuka himself does not believe in!
          1. vorobey
            vorobey 15 June 2012 14: 29
            +11
            Sir Winston, taking off my hat with earflaps. as always to the point.
        2. 755962
          755962 15 June 2012 14: 30
          +18
          Quote: Bunny
          officials simply do not see them!

          You can’t shove it under the rock and the horseradish."The difference between a statesman and a politician is that a politician is guided by the next elections,
          and a statesman for the next generation. "
          Winston Spencer CHURCHILL.
      2. Tersky
        Tersky 15 June 2012 15: 09
        +10
        Quote: Bunny
        They live with us their self-sufficient life

        Good health, Ekaterina! They do not have self-sufficiency, absolutely .., all their benefits at the expense of the people on whose neck they sit .... Self-sufficiency is complete independence from the external economy, that is, an economy that presupposes absolute sovereignty, but where is it among the "elite"? what can they except steal and promote? All their benefits are welded from the external economy, i.e. with us ..
      3. smile
        smile 15 June 2012 16: 08
        +11
        Bunny
        The bureaucracy is the System. Person. getting into it either breaks in, or grinds .... A small example - when we went to university at law school everyone at the interview asked - why are you going there? ... My God, what did we answer there - from building a bright society, devoid of crime. before the surrender of life in the struggle for morality and morality ...... And yet they wholeheartedly spoke (at least the majority) ... and now we went to work ... many to the organs (the Union had already collapsed) and ran into the System ... already decomposed with the collapse of the old morality. replaced by new ideals - live for yourself, the altruist is a sucker, honest is a beggar .... formalism .... the main thing is not to solve the crime - but to avoid unnecessary work, also cut the dough, along with sticks, etc ... ..
        The result - four classmates died in gang warfare, a couple are sitting (one - a former opera, twice, on serious charges), one last year in Sochi became a thief in law .....
        Therefore, when the current authorities criticize. that they can’t cope with corruption and cops, sorry, pontoons at once to be honest, for me it’s obvious that people are simply not able to understand. how heavy it is, how great the inertia of the System, affected by this corrosive disease, is brought into the body by those whose followers seek to return to food under the swampy swagger .... I, for example, see no other way out. except hard. cruel and severe measures of influence .... but how to implement it ... probably no one knows.
        Wasserman says everything very correctly, but how to put his wishes into practice ...... it would be better if he told about this. He is an intelligent man, and he would have spoken out what he thinks on this subject ....
        1. Paratov
          Paratov 15 June 2012 16: 22
          +10
          Quote: smile
          ... for example, I see no other way. except hard. cruel and severe measures of influence.

          So you yourself answered your own question! Carrot and stick. While we observe only gingerbread cookies ... Will is needed, iron will! And the head of state is obliged to monitor the implementation of his orders, and for non-compliance brutally punish. Otherwise, he is not the head, but the fifth point. Remember under Stalin, as soon as he did not comply, he dodged, and even more so sabotaged the order, he immediately overtook the reckoning, against the wall, like a spy, enemy, etc. for persuasiveness, but the main fault was not fulfilling the order!
          1. smile
            smile 15 June 2012 17: 05
            +6
            Paratov
            Oh-hoho ... I answered something, but how exactly is it ... What, death squads to create? Also not a matter .... damn it! Although we are setting our law enforcement agencies against each other so that they look for lice from each other ... it’s not a pity for other people's lice and competition, again ....
        2. Busido
          Busido 15 June 2012 17: 58
          0
          It is possible to speak sensibly. Will they understand it ?! If you can call it "stupid". It's easier, easier, why understand something?
        3. korrrnet
          korrrnet 15 June 2012 18: 28
          +4
          It was carried out already. And very successfully. It was called a dictatorship. The proletariat was not the lumpen proletariat.
          1. smile
            smile 15 June 2012 19: 39
            +4
            korrrne
            It's like that. but at that time the former bureaucratic apparatus either perished in the fire of the civil war, or emigrated. or shut up ... not so many have come to serve in the new state. And now ... where to put them, these millions? Shoot? You have to shoot too much - it will end badly. It is advisable to scare it with harsh measures ... but where can I get new ones ... it's like a snake biting its tail ...
            Of course, this is not what I mean. that you need to give up and sit. just get around ... There simply cannot be quick changes without blood! But I don’t want blood, I really don’t want it, the country is barely getting out like that! Of course, there are positive changes, no matter how much they criticize the authorities, but there are no real quick recipes.
            By the way, I can’t refrain from throwing another stone in the marshes - if the democrat Ksyusha found a similar amount in cash in the USA. then, without further ado, under the same circumstances, she would go to the bunk, and not for one year! So what is most about that. that in power thieves are shouting those who have their own hat on ....
        4. Ziksura
          Ziksura 15 June 2012 22: 04
          +2
          Quote: smile
          Therefore, when the current authorities criticize. that they can’t cope with corruption and cops, sorry, pontoons at once to be honest, for me it’s obvious that people are simply not able to understand. how heavy it is, how great the inertia of the System, affected by this corrosive disease, is brought into the body by those whose followers seek to return to food under the swampy swagger .... I, for example, see no other way out. except hard. cruel and severe measures of influence ....

          The words of a person who understands and is literate. Plus definitely.
          Quote: smile
          but how to do it ... probably no one knows.

          Not worth it so categorically. There are recipes. But this is either a lot of blood or a lot of work. And very, very, very long.
          1. smile
            smile 15 June 2012 22: 12
            +1
            Ziksura
            Yes, I agree with you .. completely agree! As for no one knows, I clearly got excited. I believe that we will succeed, and not through blood.
        5. smile
          smile 16 June 2012 04: 40
          +1
          Guys, an hour ago I found out that another classmate of mine was a 19 year old ... former head of the FSB of the Zelenograd district of the Kaliningrad region ... dad general of the KGB ... Igor Kepel resigned as captain ... businessssssss .... two corpses. ..... a rather vile story with a degree of certainty. which makes you pay attention to it ...... the guy was a good one ... we respected each other, being students - we helped out ..... he is 4 years older than me ... byo ..... proof 100. ..and Igor does not deny .... The system not only grinds - it changes people ... it hurts ...... it would be better if Igor shot himself ...... but would not demand a jury trial ...... I would shoot myself = I don’t know. that it prompted him to such a thing ...... but death is better than such a shame .... who cares, google, there probably is everything there .... damn it, I don’t want ...... but at least kill , I can’t take a shit about Igor, ..... this is such a dishonest creature .... and I’m not sure that being in the investigation team, I wouldn’t try to help him ... here’s something ... .and no president would have influenced me ..... so that I am the same g ... as those whom I criticize .....
      4. Ross
        Ross 15 June 2012 16: 56
        +11
        Bunny,

        I still can’t understand, we’re taking some fools as officials, or are they fooling around there, on the spot? .. By the principle; was a man - he became an official.


        Here is how Boris Tatishchev answers this question in his book "Aryan Fundamentalism":

        "Discovered and introduced into scientific circulation by Carl Gustav. Jung, the effect of" PSYCHIC INFLATION ", that is," self-identification, and without a hint of humor, with the position or title ... "accompanied by" atrophy of the individual's personality, as a result of which the a miserable creature, "may well be considered, along with hemorrhoids, the most typical" occupational disease "of the bureaucracy.
        In turn, the Aggregor of the BUREAUCRACY itself, which closes the thoughts and desires of the entire mass of bureaucrats on their corporate and clan interests, gives rise to an effect that is formulated in terms of the Theory of Control Systems as follows: "The contour of the control object exceeds the contour of the control system."
        To put it differently and simply, the bureaucracy posed OVER SOCIETY always ignores the interests of this society in order to satisfy its selfish-corporate, narrowly clan interests.
        The bureaucrat - a materialist, placed above society, simply cannot do otherwise. About the bureaucrats of the Satanists, not to mention at all.
        For ANY bureaucrat, corporate-clan interests and the “opinion” of superiors will be “above all” always, everywhere and in everything, OUT OF DEPENDENCE on him
        - IDEOLOGICAL color,
        - PARTY accessories and most
        - ENDLESS BENEFIT of his personal DESIRE, motives and PLANS.
        How this affects the state of affairs of society itself is not difficult to guess.
        Those who have realized this do not need an excess of mental effort to understand the fact that if there is a certain large enough, socially significant GROUP of ANY most ordinary people:
        - to distinguish from the “crowd”, artificially restricting access to this group by “nomenclature-personnel” selection or procedures of “democratic elections”,
        - to empower them with POWER FUNCTIONS and authority, providing TOTALLY REQUIRED SECRET Secret Advisers-Specialists (consultants, referents, experts and “assistants”),
        - put over society, while forcing
        - to rant about GOOD (“bright future”, “unity of the party and people”, “equal opportunities”, “socialist gains” or “democratic values” and so on) loudly and a lot,
        - but in fact - to carry a lot of people evil, mostly masked by "caring for working people" or "humanistic, universal values", then
        group STREOTYPES of the psyche of the overwhelming majority of the group (if not at all of all its members) will arise here quite definite and quite predictable.
        A similar practice, sooner or later, even in the EARLY NORMAL people, not to mention the degenerates infected with the “power complex”, creates a psychological stereotype, the essence of which some Western psychologists call the “PRINCIPLE OF HUMANITY”

        1. aksakal
          aksakal 15 June 2012 21: 40
          +4
          Ross, an informative and interesting post, plus .. It’s not written just how to destroy it. In principle, not very difficult.
          Quote: Ross
          For ANY bureaucrat, corporate-clan interests and the “opinion” of superiors will be “above all” always, everywhere and in everything, OUT OF DEPENDENCE on his — IDEOLOGICAL color — PARTY affiliation and the ENTIRE WELFARE of his personal DESIRE, motives and PLANS.
          - it is enough to throw a feedback loop from the welfare of society to corporate and clan interests and to the welfare of the bosses, to interconnect them. The deterioration of the welfare of society should inevitably worsen the welfare of the bosses and harm corporate and clan interests. Another thing is that the bureaucracy will in every way resist (and in the whole post-Soviet space it successfully resists to this day - am ) establishing such a connection.
      5. SF93
        SF93 15 June 2012 20: 19
        +3
        They climb into power not in order to help a simple person, but in order to profit, eat and crap on the same person’s head. An official is no longer a profession, the social class layer is far from the best in our society. Take away from them all the privileges, immunities and the feeder, they themselves will crawl like worms in their foreign villas.
      6. Old Man57
        Old Man57 15 June 2012 21: 38
        0
        The Russian official is the spiritual heir to the Golden Horde Baskaks: for him, as for the Baskak, the position is SINEKURA (lie down and receive only benefits ...) yes
      7. Cadet787
        Cadet787 16 June 2012 12: 03
        +1
        Bunny.
        The officials have one principle, they came to power, steal for the rest of their lives, and then the grass does not grow further.
    2. Neighbor
      Neighbor 15 June 2012 15: 05
      +1
      Quote: Middle Brother
      Wasserman. as always, magnificent.

      Clever man - there is no bazaar.
      Although strange. Well, like that - he lived his whole life - and a virgin! belay yes
      What about children? Well, really, I never wanted to have children - a son, a daughter? I won’t believe in life! wassat
      He says he made a vow of celibacy! To whom did he ask? I am the master of my word - I want it, I want it - I took it! laughing
      In general - like many very smart people - the roof leaks from Malets!
      1. lotus04
        lotus04 15 June 2012 19: 24
        +2
        Quote: Neighbor
        What about children? Well, really, I never wanted to have children - a son, a daughter? I won’t believe in life! wassat
        He says he made a vow of celibacy! To whom did he ask? I am the master of my word - I want it, I want it - I took it! laughing
        In general - like many very smart people - the roof leaks from Malets


        Do not judge, but do not be judged.

        I respect Wasserman! Zh_i_d and Jew - different concepts.
        1. Odinplys
          Odinplys 15 June 2012 21: 57
          0
          Quote: lotus04
          I respect Wasserman! Zh_i_d and Jew - different concepts.


          Yes ... only a certain Gunther ... a German seems .... recently wrote a poem ... so his media ... so branded ... the whole world gang of Zionists went wild ... and Wasserman writes out ... and neither ... nor the massad ... nor the US State Department ... nor the Russian SMRAD ... have no complaints ... I wonder who gave the go-ahead ...
          I think if Wasserman is a Jew of Russian nationality ... he will not be offended by my statements ... (because the Jews did ... be it ... and they are doing it now) ...
          That would write an article by Wasserman ... appeal to World Jewry ... with a proposal to repent publicly ... for the centuries-old genocide of the Russian People ...
          Well, we would be supported by the whole World ...
          And the article ... well, the article ... you think at the top they don’t understand what needs to be done to preserve the unity of peoples ... (you don’t have to go far to read Stalin ... everything is said there) ... understand ... only he wants some because Russia needs ... and the Zionists ... having huge finances ... because they need (the creation of world-controlled chaos) ... And the whole question ... as usual ... who whom ...
          So "minus" ... Neighbor (1) ... it's not worth it ... Jews have earned such authority for themselves for centuries ... and We have every moral right to them ... at least ... not to trust

          “But you have to start somewhere! For a long time I have been guided by the motto:“ while no one is doing, nothing is being done. ”I think this applies to the authorities as well.

          Here is an example of a call to what .... methods of influence can of course ... be changed ... and the result will not be long in coming ... but how many SMRADA ... are being poured on Stalin today ... for the greatest strategic breakthrough .. .for the salvation of our homeland ... from the enslavement of the Zionists ...
        2. wk
          wk 16 June 2012 02: 45
          +1
          Quote: lotus04
          Zh_i_d and Jew - different concepts.

          there are no Jews at all in Europe, including Russia .... Jews are European in all languages ​​alike ... the names began to be denied in Soviet Russia where in the early years of the revolution the liberal was rampant - Bolshevism was an ardent representative of which Trotsky was. .. Trotsky and K * dealt with, but they didn’t correct the tendency towards a national liberal and under Stalin they didn’t change it and the Stalinist government had many Jews ... they fought a lot under Khrushchev, but Brezhnev finally got rid ... and the official JEWISH was entrenched ... but I’m not at all against the Jews ... on the contrary, when among them there is an INTERDISTRACTOR who ceases to be loyal to the state in which they serve ... and this can only be one - the state of residence and citizenship, and all these conversations are two Homeland disgusting shame! VASSERMAN CITIZEN OF UKRAINE AND A RESIDENT OF ODESSA DOESN'T APPLY TO SUCH! ... Respect and respect!
        3. Konstantm
          Konstantm 16 June 2012 09: 31
          +1
          I agree. They say about such people: "He is more Russian than the Russians themselves."
  2. vorobey
    vorobey 15 June 2012 12: 29
    +13
    Now we are being carefully pushed onto the path of the colonial empire. Let us recall at least how often in (in the words of Andrei Ilyich Fursov) the SMRAD - mass media, agitation, misinformation - scornful nicknames of representatives of ethnic groups flashed, whose native lands were torn away from Russia in the disastrous 1991 year. And the ethnic diversity of the current Russian Federation has been awarded many equally contemptuous nicknames. In Soviet times, such a behavior of a journalist was impossible not only due to strict censorship, but also thanks to decades of upbringing and self-education. And not only Soviet. In imperial times, the inadmissibility of driving wedges along ethnic joints was also obvious

    I say - some kind of wrong Jew Wasserman. it turns out more Russian than even some of us.

    why is sitting idle. Or are such heads needed only for intelligent television games?
    1. NUT
      NUT 15 June 2012 12: 47
      +5
      Quote: vorobey
      I say - some kind of wrong Jew Wasserman ...
      ... why is sitting idle
      But because
      Quote: vorobey
      sitting idle.
      that
      Quote: vorobey
      it turns out more Russian than even some of us.

      drinks
    2. gojesi
      gojesi 15 June 2012 14: 52
      +7
      Quote: vorobey
      some kind of wrong Jew Wasserman. it turns out more Russian than even some of us

      ... to the question: what is your nationality? I.V. Stalin answered in exasperation: I, a Russian, of Georgian nationality!
      So Wasserman, IMHO ...
      1. Ross
        Ross 15 June 2012 17: 22
        +1
        gojesi,
        [hide]
        ... to the question: what is your nationality? I.V. Stalin answered in exasperation: I, a Russian, of Georgian nationality!
        So Wasserman, IMHO ...

        Three times I agree with these words.
    3. Old Man57
      Old Man57 15 June 2012 22: 37
      +1
      There was such an organization not long before the revolution (somewhere from 1905 to 1917) - the Union of the Russian People. In common parlance they were called "CHERNOCHOTENTS". Maybe you heard ?!
      It was based on shopkeepers, small merchants and other small entrepreneurs (the middle class as they say now), as well as janitors (then it was the lowest rank of police) ... there were also individual representatives of the intelligentsia
      ... Their main task was to fight all sorts of revolutionaries (to disperse a demonstration or rally of some sort ... to tell some zealous agitator ... to destroy the "office" of some public organization or newspaper associated with revolutionaries ... without interfering, so to speak , the police - on a "voluntary basis" in general.) They did not disdain the organization and conduct of Jewish pogroms (more precisely, they were their main organizers in Russia)
      So: the executive leader (that is, who "pulled all the work") and the two main ideologues of the movement were ... Baptized Russian Jews !!! Fortunately, in the Russian Empire, anyone who professed Orthodoxy and supported the Russian national idea, regardless of national roots, was considered Russian ... like this !!!
      And one more thing: after the February Revolution of 17, when everyone was overwhelmed by revolutionary euphoria and EVERYONE was rejoicing throughout Peter and Russia, there was only one person (more precisely, an organization) who directly and openly spoke out AGAINST.
      At one large meeting in Petrograd, where representatives of all parties and movements in Russia shouted from the rostrum "hurray hurray for the revolution, hurray hurray for the republic .. !!!" (even members of the House of Romanov), right from the same rostrum, in front of a crowd of revolutionary sailors and soldiers (and a revolutionary intellectual riffraff ...) he declared that he considered the revolution and the overthrow of the monarchy to be the GREATEST TRAGEDY in the history of Russia !!! This person was ZHEBOTINSKY - the leader of the movement of Russian ZIONISTS !!!
      So understand these Jews ... request laughing laughing
      1. Odinplys
        Odinplys 15 June 2012 23: 51
        -2
        Quote: Old Man57
        declared that he considers the revolution and the overthrow of the monarchy - the GREATEST TRAGEDY in the history of Russia !!! This person was ZHEBOTINSKY - the leader of the Russian ZIONIST movement !!!
        So understand these Jews ...


        And what is surprising here ... "on the thief and the hat is on" ... everything can be said when the deed has already been done ...

        World War II ... the Zionists raise Hitler (a Jew) ... give him Europe without a fight ... and send him to the USSR ... but feeling defeat from afar ... they launch a distraction ... the destruction of their own people ... Eastern Jews ... after the war, the Jews are striving for the formation of a "state" of Israel ... as if apologizing for their own ...
        Or Ms. ... to the masson Andropov .... and his henchman Gorbachev .... the humpbacked were driven to such a magnitude of power structures .... where he was able to deliver a decisive blow to the USSR ...
        Therefore ... one thing needs to be understood ... until the Jewish People publicly repents to the Peoples of Russia for their centuries of destruction ... their words are nothing more than a sound ...

        In all countries where Jews settled in large numbers, they lowered their moral standard, commercial honesty, isolate themselves and are not amenable to assimilation. They ridiculed and tried to undermine the Christian religion. They established a state in the state and, in case of opposition to them, seek to mortally strangle the country financially. If we, through the Constitution, do not exclude them / from the United States /, then in less than two hundred years they will rush in large numbers, gain the upper hand, swallow the country and change the form of our government. If you do not exclude them, then in less than two hundred years our descendants will work in their fields to provide them with food, while the Jews will rub their hands in money-changing offices. I warn you, gentlemen, that if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children will curse you in your graves.

        BENJAMIN FRANKLIN / 1706-1790 / American Physicist and a politician. From a speech in the discussion of the US Constitution in 1787
  3. Tersky
    Tersky 15 June 2012 12: 32
    +8
    Vesserman is right, such a concept as shame has been replaced by "SMRAD", and the trail of this amber stretches from wherever possible and impossible.
    1. gojesi
      gojesi 15 June 2012 14: 55
      +7
      Quote: Tersky
      such a thing as shame is replaced by "SMRAD", and it drags on

      one fifteen-year-old girl did not know what CONSCIENCE was ...
      And the other in a white nightie and in black stockings came to the graduation ... The purpose of SMRAD is to make animals of us. I note - it turns out they have a good idea !!!
  4. sergey261180
    sergey261180 15 June 2012 12: 34
    +3
    There is a Council for Nationalities, but there is no "nationality" column in the passport. What will the bureaucrats be guided by? And what will he (the council) decide? Whom to give subsidies, to whom not to give? No, you guys will decide: either we are all "Russians", or each of us in huts.
    1. Ustas
      Ustas 15 June 2012 13: 03
      +2
      There is a Council for Nationalities, but there is no "nationality" column in the passport
      .
      No, you guys will decide: either we are all "Russians", or each of us in huts.

      Well, right, abolish all the national republics in the province. Here Zhirik is right.
      1. Gavrilon
        Gavrilon 15 June 2012 13: 30
        +8
        after the collapse of the union and, in principle, even with it, the administrative division of the territory was done on a national basis (where is what nationality is such a republic and there) immediately disputes arise. In theory, it is necessary to completely change the administrative-territorial policy so that we can live in one subject: Russians, Udmurts, Tatars, Bashkirs within the Kama District (autonomous region), well, something like this.

        And the question will disappear by itself when everyone, regardless of nationality, will live in a particular subject bully .
        1. Churchill
          Churchill 15 June 2012 14: 32
          +8
          Gavrilon,
          The name has already been invented, this is the okrug. To create 30-35 federal districts that include several regions, and then blurring the borders to generalize the power structures, then divide the territories of the former regions into smaller lands subordinate only to the district center. on the basis of 2-3, create one, for example a county. Thus, the number of officials, deputies and generals will be reduced by 1,5 - 2 times.
          But in order to do all this and bring it to its logical end, in no case do you need to breed discussions, excite the unhealthy imagination of the average person, and systematically, step by step, bend the necessary line, naturally under specious and mutually beneficial pretexts.
  5. NUT
    NUT 15 June 2012 12: 43
    +2
    Everything is right, everything is right, everything to the point and you can drink with Anatoly Wesserman, although his surname is seriously alarming
    The national question today is one of the most acute, painful and vital issues on the whole Russian Land
    But until 1991, at least, even at the everyday level, it seemed that this was "not a question" and there simply cannot be such a question
    In tsarist times, places or the Pale of Settlement officially existed
    In Soviet times, the same place or trait did not exist officially
    And while this principle or scheme worked, there simply weren’t and couldn’t be any problems with the national question.
    Who does not believe, he can ask Moscow grandmothers: "Who lived in Moscow then?" Or Voronezh grandfathers: "Who traded in the bazaar then"
    What is happening today, everyone sees with their own eyes and does not need comments, because ADMIN will not miss all these comments ...
    1. volcano
      volcano 15 June 2012 14: 55
      +6
      Dear Walnut, do you really not know that in relations with people you do not need to look at the names and proceed from them to draw conclusions about the nationality and, accordingly, the person’s
      For example, a Jew is not a nationality, I would say a way of life.
      One can cite examples ad infinitum of both Jews and Germans, etc., who became Russians.
      Well offhand Evgeny Margulis, Bering, Barclay de Tolly, Lefort and many others.
      Our land and people are magical. We can relate a person of any nationality into Russian, if only the person was good.
      And vice versa, a very poor American, a German, is obtained from Russian, God forbid a Pole or an Estonian.
      The contradiction in the gene code is so strong that, as a rule, all kinds of evil ghouls are obtained from such people.
      It is not for nothing that even the first-wave émigrés and their descendants are still Russians and call themselves Russians despite the fact that they have been living in France, Belgium, Brazil for 70-80 years .... and so on.
      1. NUT
        NUT 15 June 2012 16: 12
        -1
        Quote: volkan
        in relations with people you do not need to look at surnames and draw conclusions from them

        "All Jews - from Spinoza to Gruzenberg - cannot deny that when the word" Jews "is pronounced, everyone around them feels suspicion, mistrust, expecting something bad, expecting trouble for themselves ...
        ... That's what, my dear Russians: such a comprehensive mistrust from such ancient times - cannot but have a basis.
        And therefore, in every possible way shun the Jews and do not enter into any relationship with them.
        If, walking down the street, you see from a distance a figure "as if a Jew" - lower your eyes and thus will not see him. "
        V.V. Rozanov
        Quote: volkan
        One can cite examples ad infinitum of both Jews and Germans, etc., who became Russians.
        "A Jew will never be able to assimilate, he will never accept the morals and customs of other peoples, a Jew remains a Jew under all circumstances; any assimilation always remains purely external."
        Leopold Cohn
        1. volcano
          volcano 15 June 2012 16: 59
          0
          Walnut, yes I could give you many quotes about Jews. And even to agree with them, but upon reflection you will understand that there are Jews about whom all these quotes are, and there are Russified, who are only due to known reasons and surnames.
          1. NUT
            NUT 17 June 2012 04: 02
            0
            Judging by the thin "minuses" given to me and OdinPlys, that Leopold Conn is also
            Quote: OdinPlys
            I support ...
            doubts creep in, and maybe in truth:
            Quote: volkan
            there are Russified, who are only due to known reasons and surnames.
            albeit very hard to believe
        2. Odinplys
          Odinplys 15 June 2012 22: 35
          -1
          Quote: NUT
          "A Jew will never be able to assimilate, he will never accept the morals and customs of other peoples, a Jew remains a Jew under all circumstances; any assimilation always remains purely external."
          Leopold Cohn


          I support ... the top ten ... There is no Jewish Russian ... Jewish Tatar ... they will not let anyone in ... for that they want to be present in all nations ...
          By their hatred of the other Nations of the World ... they drove themselves to a standstill ... from which there is no escape ...
        3. Old Man57
          Old Man57 15 June 2012 23: 24
          +1
          Quote: NUT
          "A Jew will never be able to assimilate, he will never accept the morals and customs of other peoples, a Jew remains a Jew under all circumstances; any assimilation always remains purely external."

          The wonderful Russian bard ROSENBAUM (a purebred Jew - which is no secret to anyone) even in Soviet times wrote a wonderful series of songs dedicated to the Russian COSSACKS.
          In Soviet times, they (Rosenbaum, Vysotsky, etc.) tried not to allow them on the radio, and especially on television, but ... sometimes it did happen!
          Somewhere in the 80s, like (or even earlier), I had a chance to hear on the radio a Joke over which the whole Soviet Union was laughing (who knew and understood, of course). One of Rosenbaum's "Cossack" songs performed by the author was broadcast on the radio (it was a tape recording of course). But the funny thing was that before this performance the host of the program said (announced): "RUSSIAN COSSACK PEOPLE song performed by Alexander Rosenbaum ".
          Russian PEOPLE'S Cossack song written by a JEWISH - you can’t say better !!!
          By the way: as I heard, Vladimir Vysotsky is also half Jewish - according to the priest! But listening to most of his "serious" songs you feel that they were written by a man with a "Russian soul" who deeply loves and understands Russia !!!
          So ... fool laughing laughing
  6. Altor86
    Altor86 15 June 2012 12: 54
    +2
    Among the Jews, there is also a division into right and wrong. I liked the chaos. And he will sit idle. Because the right ones rule there.
  7. dmb
    dmb 15 June 2012 13: 11
    0
    Wasserman is right, as always. And the list of main tasks is to the point. The trouble is in one. Who will carry them out? The notorious Council, and it will have mechanisms for this? Just yesterday, everyone had the opportunity to make sure of reality. Sheluda journalistic scum publicly accused Bastrykin of participating in an organized criminal group in Kushchevskaya. Evidence of this complicity naturally did not lead. And instead of a state official of such a high level, being legally protected by this state, he still apologized to this evil spirits for being rude to her. In any other country, both the libel and his publication would have been ruined for completely legitimate reasons. Remember Mitkov and Sorokin. How much dirt these two poured onto the army .... Which of them answered for this. So the point is not in the Pale of Settlement, but in the fact that before all nationalities were united by one idea. and the principles of social justice were not an empty phrase. Today, create at least three hundred Soviets, no one will love Chubais, Usmanov, Fridman and Gorbachev with Putin. And at the same time they will not love their fellow tribesmen living nearby and differing in their financial situation. Probably, as Zhvanetsky said, something needs to be changed at the conservatory.
    1. Odinplys
      Odinplys 15 June 2012 22: 41
      -1
      Quote: dmb
      Probably, as Zhvanetsky said, something needs to be changed at the conservatory.


      Found an example to follow ... Zhvanetsky ... Zionist ... uy ... side ...

      Quote: dmb
      Today, create at least three hundred Soviets, no one will love Chubais, Usmanov, Fridman and Gorbachev with Putin.



      You forgot to add your surname to this list ... Ofigel ... to compare a hunchbacked man with Putin ...)))
      1. dmb
        dmb 16 June 2012 20: 45
        0
        Zhvanetsky is certainly not an example of imitation in everything, but in terms of the conservatory as applied to the problem posed in the article, its expression is most suitable. As for your wishes on the second question, I personally do not compile lists. My attitude towards the listed people is quite possibly different from yours, with the only difference being that the Uzbek Usmanov is happy with you, and the Uzbek Kahramon, who is sweeping in your yard, is not. Moreover, if you expel Kahramona, then you yourself will not go to his place. For judging by the comments you see yourself exclusively as a list compiler. In conclusion, I would like to recall the fate of many fans to make various lists. They also considered themselves the highest race.
  8. Odessa
    Odessa 15 June 2012 13: 37
    +4
    I don’t know how much Waserman is right, but if unity is needed for diversity, this is called anonymization, and if it is a nationality (which consists of religion, culture and tradition), then equalization is obtained - be it not who, be like everyone else, it’s cult came from the USA.
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 15 June 2012 13: 43
      +6
      Esther, let me disagree with you. It is easier to beat with a herd and dad, the parable of the broom, the parable of the sprayed fist, etc. That is what it is about. Find at least one similar rod in the broom, although all from the same tree.
      1. Odessa
        Odessa 15 June 2012 14: 32
        +3
        vorobey (1), the only time when I disagree with you, the opposition has already piled up on the `` father '' in Syria, so from time to time on a shard and get, notice both Arabs, a fist in a spread in a parable, this or give shake hands with five, or push in the face, a moot point! (Most are not always right!) True, the demo is not entirely in the subject, but the essence is clear.
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 15 June 2012 14: 45
          +6
          So the same thing awaits us. 65% support Assad, but there is no cohesion. therefore cut them. where the men of Syria why are not self-mobilizing in units to protect their women and children. When nations, despite their faith, their skin color and orientation, can defend one goal together, then they get a fist. And they’ll break it down a stick. I wrote already in one discussion. If we do not stop the Tatars better than the Bashkirs, the Mordvinians do not sit on the pot next to the Russian. Caucasus steers in the sandbox, etc. - we will all stand side by side in a pose with his pants down and say, how we were all wrong. It was necessary to be friends, and we were led like sheep to fairy tales about independence and divine blood.
        2. O.Tool
          O.Tool 15 June 2012 14: 57
          +9
          Regarding your photo: being in Germany at the FIFA World Cup in 2006, I rather rudely pushed the "rainbow" bastard away from me. Much to my surprise, the policeman "turned on the ignore" and even, as it seemed to me, smiled rather. And this, despite the fact that I was dressed from head to toe in Russian symbols. Looks like you have not all tolerance there !!! But here in Moscow, they almost sent him to "kichu" for giving him a little in the face, dirtyly reviling Serbs against the Anglo-Saxons.
    2. vladimir64ss
      vladimir64ss 15 June 2012 14: 37
      +3
      ,
      Quote: Odessa
      diversity needs unity, this is called depersonalization,

      dialectics. There are ways to resolve such issues.
    3. Churchill
      Churchill 15 June 2012 14: 46
      +10
      Odessa,
      Culture, religion, traditions, cuisine, languages ​​- this is as much as you like! But in the politics of a multinational state, as well as the economy, nationality should not play any role. Otherwise, it will not be a state, but a powder keg. Before the first crisis, taking advantage of which cunning guys will ruin everything; and culture, and religion, and traditions ...
      The onset of civilization on humanity is so subtle that any extreme situation very quickly turns people into cattle, especially young and inexperienced.
      If everyone starts playing football according to their own rules, there will be no football! ..
      1. Odessa
        Odessa 15 June 2012 15: 07
        +5
        So, I’m talking about a compromise for you! Otherwise, you will get, as in Israel, religious Jews, this is a privileged caste who (in their majority) do not work, and for their prayers they are also subsidized by the state, and have a powerful party in the Knesset supported by such as an electorate. So, Churchill, in politics, a lot of national state, nationality still plays a role, no matter how you would like.
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 15 June 2012 15: 24
          +7
          Esther is a tactless question. I have Ukrainian-Russian-Mordovian-Tatar blood in my wife. Who should be considered her?
          1. Odessa
            Odessa 15 June 2012 15: 47
            +8
            vorobey (1), count your wife!
            Who cares who the person is by nationality?
            1. vorobey
              vorobey 15 June 2012 16: 03
              +6
              Here I am about that.
        2. Paratov
          Paratov 15 June 2012 15: 47
          +8
          Odessa,
          National hatred can only be defeated by love, passionate, hot, selfless! .. When a grandchild has all the grandmothers and children, then no matter how much they are at enmity with each other, they love their grandson equally, and the grandson loves them with all the strength of his modernized immunity!
          When one Russian peasant was asked how he relates to Jews, he immediately replied - no way! Then he thought for a second and added - "But it is much better for Jewish women! .." love love love
    4. swarog57
      swarog57 15 June 2012 15: 19
      +6
      Odessa "diversity needs unity, this is called depersonalization." I took this statement differently, all the diversity of cultures, religions, characters, etc. united by a common goal, for example, to defeat the enemy, to achieve success in the economy, to break the knots of interethnic contradictions ... And in this A. Wasserman is right, the article is correct.
      1. Odessa
        Odessa 15 June 2012 16: 44
        +4
        swarog57, not so much the article is correct, how much for the spite of the day. Read carefully the last paragraph, why create such a structure in Russia, according to the UN principle? Do people themselves not know how to live? And clarifications are needed? , regardless of nationality. And if anyone begins to row about ethnic grounds, then there are the police and other power structures. Remember once and for all that there are no bad nationalities, there are bad people!
        1. Odinplys
          Odinplys 15 June 2012 22: 46
          -2
          Quote: Odessa
          Remember once and for all that there are no bad nationalities, there are bad people!


          There is ... there is one bad tribe ... bringing Russia only misfortunes ... suffering for mothers ... and the People ... Zionist Jews ... they must leave Russia forever ... without the right of entry and residence .. .and preferably on your own ...
  9. O.Tool
    O.Tool 15 June 2012 13: 48
    +10
    First, it is necessary to stop the Zionist persecution of the common Russian people, I myself am not a Slav, but I admit that the cementing component of the existence of the Russian State is the Russian ethnos, and this in no way infringes on my National Identity !!! And the fact that Our Customs and way of life are slightly different, well, it does not interfere with respecting mine, I am not afraid of this word of the Brothers, albeit not by blood, but by spirit and worldview and Confession, which is no less important than genetic relationship. I, and the overwhelming majority of my fellow tribesmen, are well aware that if it were not for Russia, then the dilemma would be the same - if you Osman, or the fate of millions of Armenians !!! And it's enough for the "God's chosen" to scare us with terrible nationalists, of whom Miser Meager !!! Never, I repeat NEVER, in my almost 50 years, did not feel a little bit of discrimination on the part of the Russians, in relation to myself. And after all, he lived a lot, after university and in the Urals and Siberia. And how many trains ... And even the term "elder" brother "does not jar me, because it is pedaled by the liberoid Mpa3 with the obvious goal of the systematic disintegration of My State. When both my grandfathers fought for the country, there were no elders or younger ones. field of battle, before the face of Death, All Gemini! Well, if it is stupid to focus on the quantitative criterion in the ratio of the Nations, then let him be an elder, so God has given since the time of Babylon. Lord !!! Let's Just Respect and Love each other, remembering Fighting Brotherhood and Unity of our Ancestors, or in vain did they pour their Blood? !!! Neither Geyropa nor the United States has such a powerful component for Consolidation! That is why tolerance and stress on the description of historical realities, for the destruction of our Memory will inevitably lead to ethnic antagonism! Do not buy into Cheap Jewish tricks, and then a Strong and Prosperous Empire BE !!! And Zionist fascists and their multinational henchmen will burn in hell!stylistic confusion of this message. It's just a hangover syndrome after a birthday party drinks Py. Sy. Respect for Wasserman for sanity! This is rare among his fellow tribesmen. I want to believe that he is sincere in his maxims, and not a well-camouflaged setup!
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 15 June 2012 13: 51
      +6
      I put a big plus for a like-minded person.
      1. Odessa
        Odessa 15 June 2012 14: 36
        0
        O.Tool, really right, only advice is a waste of time, who will oversee it, the UN (think about the words of the abbreviation) is also an organization of the United NATIONS, but what's the use of them?
        1. 11Goor11
          11Goor11 15 June 2012 17: 05
          0
          And what would happen without the UN?
          So at least some possibility of order.
    2. Churchill
      Churchill 15 June 2012 14: 53
      +8
      O.Tool,
      This term "older brother" offends many and this is understandable, apparently someone either out of stupidity or deliberately, hoping for the opposite effect, introduced it into mass use, but in fact it should sound like "big brother", But you can't argue with such an interpretation. It seems that the meaning is the same, but how different interpretations are! ..
      1. O.Tool
        O.Tool 15 June 2012 15: 03
        +7
        Your definition is quite appropriate. Grateful. It was worthwhile to detail it yourself, but the cursing abstinence overcame wink
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 15 June 2012 15: 09
          +7
          Quote: O.Tool
          definition


          Quote: O.Tool
          withdrawal symptoms


          In my house, just do not bend. I feel myself illiterate.
          1. O.Tool
            O.Tool 15 June 2012 15: 14
            +6
            Sorry !!! I don’t choose the words, all the more, I don’t try to be clever, I just “talk as I say” I didn’t want to hurt in any way smile
            1. vorobey
              vorobey 15 June 2012 15: 20
              +6
              no problem, I was joking.
              1. Paratov
                Paratov 15 June 2012 16: 37
                +7
                Quote: vorobey


                Let’s do without these Teligent stuff! In our villages this is called existentialism! Although it certainly looks somewhat ambivalent, the sensuality of today's perception of reality does not undermine at all.
                1. vorobey
                  vorobey 15 June 2012 16: 48
                  +8
                  Another acadamic drew. With you, you will inevitably expand your horizons.

                  Useful to decrypt.
                  1. Winter
                    Winter 15 June 2012 22: 54
                    +1
                    Gentlemen, academicians, I certainly apologize wildly, but the word "definition" is written through E! .. Otherwise, indeed, through And somehow it looks ambivalent. request
  10. FREGATENKAPITAN
    FREGATENKAPITAN 15 June 2012 14: 10
    +1
    ... Onotole, as always, ..... + 100500,
    By the way, he is not sitting idle, he is a journalist and political consultant ......
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 15 June 2012 14: 18
      +3
      in fact of the matter Igor consultant can be listened to and you can bypass the ear.
      1. vladimir64ss
        vladimir64ss 15 June 2012 14: 42
        -2
        [quote = vorobey] consultant, you can listen, but you can [
        Wasserman, with his fame, can already be elected.
    2. Odinplys
      Odinplys 15 June 2012 23: 17
      0
      Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
      ... Onotole, as always, ..... + 100500,
      By the way, he is not sitting idle, he is a journalist and political consultant ......


      Who is our journalist and political consultant ...
      As earlier ... a month ago there could be an article on the site ... SOS ... Andrey Lenev ... lieutenant colonel of the special forces Sobr ... need help ... (lying unconscious from the beginning of the year ... a bullet wound to the head ) ... there it was about fundraising ... the funds come today ... for which his relatives are infinitely grateful ... But the thing is a little different ... you need to raise the public ... they refuse to transfer to the Burdenko clinic .. . supposedly an extremely hopeless condition ... today the guys called ... they started to open their eyes ... Treatment is possible only in Burdenko or Germany ... thanks to this site including funds ... almost raised ... The indifference of our officials is amazing ... It would be advisable to bum through the media ... and be more serious ...

      Well, not weak ... OUR ... reporters take the initiative ... ???

      http://vk.com/club38896767

      http://www.berdsk-online.ru/all-news/news-rarod/3026-druzya-pomozhem-russkomu-so
      ldatu
  11. AK-74-1
    AK-74-1 15 June 2012 14: 39
    +3
    Tolik Wasser anneals as always. It’s interesting at all in the country. Jews defend the Russian Empire. People with Polish roots debunk vile myths about Russia. Georgians revived the empire. Great article. I am for Russia to be a unitary state, with the appointment of governors from the center. Local self-government should be part of state authorities. Election of deputies and the head of state only. I want an empire
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 15 June 2012 15: 04
      +5
      Note that one empress, a German, exalted Russia, and the second, too, a German, after her husband and children, went to the scaffold.

      I want an empire
    2. O.Tool
      O.Tool 15 June 2012 15: 09
      +2
      Only now I'm afraid that without your "nickname" this empire, well, can not be defended. And this is regrettable ...
    3. vadimN
      vadimN 15 June 2012 15: 16
      +3
      I am joining! Only in the form of a unitary state is the existence of Russia possible! Everything else is a movement along the path of the USSR (in the sense - to collapse). National-territorial division is a time bomb under any state, and even less so under Russia.
      1. Old Man57
        Old Man57 20 June 2012 17: 17
        0
        Quote: vadimN
        Everything else is a movement along the path of the USSR (in the sense - to collapse).

        Strange logic: the period of the USSR was, it seems, the most totalitarian (and unitary) period of rule in the history of Russia! laughing
  12. Senzey
    Senzey 15 June 2012 15: 07
    +1
    “While no one does, nothing is done”


    Precisely noticed! Just talk from the TV without doing anything, change nothing in the country. Our peoples need unity, then we will be stronger and more confident.

  13. orel53
    orel53 15 June 2012 15: 55
    +1
    Wasserman, a smart man, and it would not hurt our bureaucrats to listen to him. Indeed, they are far from the people, due to which they and their geeks live, study, relax, buy property over the hill. They consider people to be cattle. They only think about their pocket, how to steal more. If you do not steal a salary, although their salaries are large compared to ordinary people, you can hardly buy a house in Russia. And to take at least a simple deputy, then they have such a scope, several apartments, several houses, plots. Where did all this come from? They dispose of the land, gas, oil, forest, as if their property is theirs, not their people’s. This should, if sold, be shared equally by the whole people, and not by a handful of oligarchs. We sell so much gas, oil, wood, various fossils, and the poorest country, and the people are miserable. Our Russia, with such resources, should live with dignity, and several times better than the West, and not exist, and not count a penny from salary to salary, or from pension to pension. Nothing is changing here, and they don’t want to change it. It’s good, satisfying and that’s all. But it can’t last long, it will be such a time and they will be dispossessed, as before, of all these folk leeches.
  14. atos_kin
    atos_kin 15 June 2012 16: 14
    +1
    Vasse plus (Vasku +). SMRAD is comparable in efficiency with the GRAD in the area of ​​defeat, and the reptile strikes around the clock.
    1. O.Tool
      O.Tool 15 June 2012 16: 36
      +2
      Dear atos_kin! I went to the Dynamo Kiev website for football news, and I was literally stunned by the amount of dirt and hatred at the Rossiyyan address. And "dirty pigs" and "under-donation", other epithets are even more disgusting. (The number of comments on the thread exceeds 400, and 90 percent, in the aforementioned style). Be so kind as to clarify, since I have not been in your country for a long time, is it possible that such a way of thinking and attitude towards Russia is so dominant in Ukraine today. I already didn't want to root for your team today, although of course I will be sick !!! Victory to you!
      1. atos_kin
        atos_kin 15 June 2012 17: 36
        +3
        No less respected O.Tool! "Thank you" for a minus if from you. But thank you for wishing the Ukrainian team victory.
        The subject of your question, of course, indirectly relates to the topic touched by Wasserman (respected by me), but it lies somewhat differently in the football plane.
        I will try to clarify. If you managed to notice by SMRAD conflicts with fans of Russia mainly occur in Poland. True, in Lviv (not far from Poland) the same were misunderstandings, but the vast majority of ordinary, not nourished burps of perestroika and born after the destruction of the USSR, Ukrainians, although it would be more correct to say the citizens of Ukraine, do not dominate the feelings of hatred towards the Russians. Rather, on the contrary, if Ukraine also flies out of the championship, they will root for the Russian team and this applies not only to football.
        At the forum that you noted, while there are more orange-fed "Nazis", under-educated (Wasserman not reading and not only him) fans (from the word to hurt your head).
        I am personally sorry that our "handlers" have taken peoples to different apartments, I emphasize not Ukrainians and Russians, but multinational peoples who have always (more than 300 years) lived together.
        1. O.Tool
          O.Tool 15 June 2012 17: 50
          +2
          Dyakuyu! Quite comprehensive! It is gratifying that svidominty is not held in high esteem! Minus is not mine, because I do not have the habit of making "arithmetic" judgments without justification. Here is a plus sign to greet a person without arguments)))
  15. black cat
    black cat 15 June 2012 16: 20
    -4
    Brad!
    the author writes By the way, Dzhugashvili himself objected to the establishment of the Union in the form of a confederation, preferring to pour all the fragments of the Russian Empire into a single Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic.
    Flies with cutlets.
    the author writes A multinational empire is always experiencing difficulties that are absent in a mono-national kingdom. But she has much more opportunities. Not to mention the benefits of cross-fertilization of diverse cultures, let me remind you of the purely economic side of things. The division of labor increases its productivity. The larger and more diverse the society, the greater the division of labor in it, the more every citizen can do for others and receive from others.
    The author confuses the multinational mono-state (Iceland, for example) with the federal (Russia for example). The division of labor in the production of a single product (computer or airplane) increases productivity. The division of labor according to the principle of Irkutsk makes airplanes, and Kalmykia makes koumiss, exposes the author's words in a funny way. True, the author is right that some can get more from others (the Caucasus), it is not clear how this will contribute to our future prosperity.
    History teaches that not one of the Federations composed on the basis of an alliance of different nations with its own territorial structure survived. While mono-states (Armenia, Iran, India, Korea) still exist.
    In essence, the author calls for the destruction of the Russian nation, with its transformation into a new mutant nation, on the basis of an incomprehensible community. Personally, I have no desire to say goodbye to the Russian nation, I am more likely ready to say goodbye to the Jews and Caucasians. Well, let them create a new nation somewhere on the island. And do not open your mouth to another loaf (to Russia).
    I am for the unification of the Russian regions in the Russian Republic as part of Russia. For starters, this will put us on a par with Chechnya and Tatarstan. And then if Russia collapses, it will be easier for the Russian Republic to concentrate on overcoming difficulties.
    1. AK-74-1
      AK-74-1 15 June 2012 17: 21
      +4
      You propose to carry out a new national division by creating a Russian republic. This will allow our "foreign partners" to promote separatist sentiments and tear away from Russia such a primordially Russian city as Kazan. It's much simpler. There must be a unitary state. Where there will be only the language of inter-territorial communication - Russian. Where there will be no division along ethnic lines, where the governors will fulfill the will of the head of state, and local peculiarities will be regulated by an elected body. It is necessary to completely change the territorial division of Russia. And those who want to develop their culture are allowed to do this through special commissions to control the financing of such activities. This will allow you to control spending and block the intervention of "democrats". Having created the same Russian republic, separatist groups will immediately be created inside for further division. I don't want the country to collapse. I WANT EMPIRE from SHIKOTAN to Kaliningrad with Przemysl and Bialystok and the Danube. And from Tiksi to Kushka.
    2. Vlaleks48
      Vlaleks48 15 June 2012 17: 27
      +6
      This is really nonsense!
      Unite respected in the territory of present Muscovy, as our well-wishers want it.
      And the question is about maintaining the territorial integrity of the Russian Empire!
      And mutants have long been living in Muscovy and in all bureaucratic offices and in the SMRADs!
      Well, to whom your words are like oil!
      No pipes for THIS EMPIRE !!!
      1. O.Tool
        O.Tool 15 June 2012 17: 36
        +1
        Dear AK-74-1 and Vlaleks48 !!! Yes, do not worry and do not argue with him! It is quite enough to look into the respondent’s profile at the place of residence indicated by him)))))))
  16. malera
    malera 15 June 2012 17: 47
    0
    Quote: Vlaleks48
    You propose to carry out a new national division by creating a Russian republic. This will allow our "foreign partners" to promote separatist sentiments and tear away from Russia such a primordially Russian city as Kazan.


    Not certainly in that way. I am in the framework of the current Constitution
    Article 66
    1. The status of the republic is determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the constitution of the republic.
    5. The status of the subject of the Russian Federation may be changed by mutual agreement of the Russian Federation and the subject of the Russian Federation in accordance with federal constitutional law.
    we, citizens of Russian nationality, can form from the Russian regions a new subject of the Russian Federation - the Russian Republic. It is possible on a unitary basis. If someone wants to join the national republics on a unitary basis, please.
    You speak: Having created the Russian republic inside, separatist groups will immediately be created for further division.
    If it is a unitary Russian republic, there will be nothing to divide, there will be no soil for separatism.

    You speak: It is necessary to completely change the territorial division of Russia. And those who want to develop their culture will be allowed to do this through special commissions to control the financing of such activities. .
    But this is against the law.
    I do not like the Kremlin (the current government), but I want to live by the law.

    You speak: This will allow our "foreign partners" to promote separatist sentiments and tear away from Russia such a primordially Russian city as Kazan.
    Note, I never spoke about the withdrawal of the Russian Republic from the Russian Federation.
    Regarding Kazan: I am not an invader. To consider Tatar Kazan a Russian city, take pity on the Tatars.
    .
  17. black cat
    black cat 15 June 2012 17: 50
    -3
    AK-74-1
    Quote: AK-74-1
    You propose to carry out a new national division by creating a Russian republic. This will allow our "foreign partners" to promote separatist sentiments and tear away from Russia such a primordially Russian city as Kazan.

    Not certainly in that way. I am in the framework of the current Constitution
    Article 66
    1. The status of the republic is determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the constitution of the republic.
    5. The status of the subject of the Russian Federation may be changed by mutual agreement of the Russian Federation and the subject of the Russian Federation in accordance with federal constitutional law.
    we, citizens of Russian nationality, can form from the Russian regions a new subject of the Russian Federation - the Russian Republic. It is possible on a unitary basis. If someone wants to join the national republics on a unitary basis, please.
    You speak: Having created the Russian republic inside, separatist groups will immediately be created for further division.
    If it is a unitary Russian republic, there will be nothing to divide, there will be no soil for separatism.

    You speak: It is necessary to completely change the territorial division of Russia. And those who want to develop their culture will be allowed to do this through special commissions to control the financing of such activities. .
    But this is against the law.
    I do not like the Kremlin (the current government), but I want to live by the law.

    You speak: This will allow our "foreign partners"to promote separatist sentiments and tear away from Russia such a primordially Russian city as Kazan.
    Note, I never spoke about the withdrawal of the Russian Republic from the Russian Federation.
    Regarding Kazan: I am not an invader. To consider Tatar Kazan a Russian city, take pity on the Tatars.

    Vlaleks48
    You think about the Empire, I think about the Russian people.
  18. Pancho
    Pancho 15 June 2012 18: 51
    -1
    I wish all Jews were like Wasserman.
    1. mind1954
      mind1954 15 June 2012 20: 55
      -1
      If everyone calling themselves Russian would be such citizens,
      like Wasserman !!! Just, as I understand it, he considers Russia his homeland.
      By the way, pay attention to his last name! Does she not tell you anything?
  19. scrack
    scrack 15 June 2012 20: 25
    0
    Tell our media that they are SMRAD, so howl will rise to heaven
  20. mind1954
    mind1954 15 June 2012 20: 47
    0
    Pitting everyone and everything! This is the goal of the raw thieves traitors,
    the masters of the fascist regime in the country!
    And all these demagogic "body movements" on national issues,
    the reaction of the regime to the indignation accumulated among the masses about this!
    An attempt to bleed off steam !!!
  21. makano
    makano 15 June 2012 22: 03
    0
    And Wasserman on the restoration of national equilibrium in Russia.
    Something does not fit the appointment of Rogozin’s right hand, comrade Bosykh, wearing a fascist sign instead of the Orthodox cross as the Head of the Federal Youth Agency under the government with
    "restoring mutual respect and creating a system for suppressing provocations" in society.
  22. Splin
    Splin 16 June 2012 01: 36
    +2
    I’ll get into the topic not entirely. Around me, everyone got drunk, children .. I understand. This is not pleasant for the Russians, technically the Ukrainian team played better in football. Hurray, the Russian team, that they will already reach the playoffs, but they won the lottery. God forbid, the Ukrainian team to reach the 1/8 finals, we and they will have to fight together and be blessed, who will win. I am not a fan of Ukraine or Russia, I am rooting for US!
    I have drunken Russians, Ukrainians and hell, you know who, they can only boil in English. Let's send all our politicians in the ass and next time we will root for Oltipiada !!!
    1. O.Tool
      O.Tool 16 June 2012 09: 35
      0
      Football is ALWAYS a topic !!! He kept rooting for you. Sorry!
  23. Messerschmitt
    Messerschmitt 16 June 2012 06: 14
    +1
    Officials are not keen to do anything. In my opinion, ethnic hatred is more profitable for them.
  24. gen.meleshkin
    gen.meleshkin 16 June 2012 14: 22
    -1
    More and more imbued with respect for this smartest person. Absolutely right!