Knights and chivalry of three centuries. Knights of Scotland (part 3)

32
Forgive you, mountains, and the North - goodbye
Here valor was born, here is the northern edge.
And wherever I was and where I wandered,
High mountains I have always loved.
(R. Burns. My heart is in the mountains. Author's translation)


We used to see in the Scots "men in plaid skirts," but as such they have become relatively recent. During Roman rule, the Picts lived in the lands of modern Scots. A very warlike people, whose soldiers were smeared with blue paint before the battle. The Romans did not waste their strength and people on conquering this cold and bleak world, but preferred to isolate themselves from it with a wall. At the time of Emperor Antonin, it was decided to erect a fortification between the west and east coasts, that is, between the bays of the Firth of Clyde and the Firth of Forth, in 160 km north of the previously constructed Adrian shaft, and called the Antoninov shaft. During the excavations on the territory of the Falkirk area lying here, archaeologists have found numerous traces of the presence of the Romans here. But then the Romans left here, and the centuries-old era of unrest and strife began.




Modern reenactors of the Battle of Bannockburn.

Well, during the period we are considering, that is, from 1050 to 1350 a year in the late Anglo-Saxon and Norman times, the Kingdom of Scotland was theoretically under English suzerainty. But when, at the end of the XIII and the beginning of the XIV century, British influence gave way to attempts at direct political control, this immediately led to wars of independence, the culmination of which was the defeat of England on the Bannockburn field in 1314.


They are, but larger. WITH historical the point of view is all very accurate. Unless the helmets are very shiny, their rust touched little. But at that time iron was of poor quality ...

At the same time, a process of cultural, political, and military unification was taking place inside Scotland, which, however, was never completed until the 18th century. The heart of the kingdom was the Pictish-Scottish state, known as the Kingdom of Alba, located in Scotland north of the line between the Firth of Forth and Clyde. Subsequently, the Vikings repeatedly landed here, so that the Anglo-Scottish border was moved away from this line far to the south.


Statue of King Malcolm III of Scotland from 1058 to 1093, (Scottish National Gallery, Edinburgh)

The Scottish monarchs also began a policy of feudalization, taking the Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Norman institutions as a model, and even called on the Normans to settle in Scotland, which ultimately had a profound influence on the Scottish military culture. Nevertheless, Scotland of the XI century was still not a single state, which was also due to such natural geographic reasons as lowland areas (“Lowland”) in the east and south and highlands (“Highlands”) in the north and west, which caused also differences in economic activities.


“The English Knights attack the Scots at the Battle of Bannockburn. Artist Graham Turner.

In the XI century, the military organization, tactics and equipment of the Scottish warriors of the low-lying areas were very similar to those in northern England, particularly in Northumbria, with cavalry playing only a minor role up to the 1000 year. Favorite weapons infantry had axes, swords and spears, and the warriors of most regions, for example, Galloway, had relatively light weapons with others throughout this era.

Knights and chivalry of three centuries. Knights of Scotland (part 3)

The handle of the Viking sword of the X century. (National Museum of the History of Scotland, Edinburgh)

Despite the appearance of even a small, but typical feudal elite in the XII-XIV centuries, the Scottish army still mainly consisted of infantry, armed at first with swords and short spears, and later with long spears or lances. Unlike England, where war has now become the lot of professionals, the Scottish peasantry continued to play an important role in military affairs, and war booty and looting were the main goal of military operations. At the end of the 13th and 14th centuries, the Scots learned to use the same siege weapons as the English, and archery was also widely spread among them.

At the same time, the war in the mountains and on the islands retained many archaic features, although even they changed over time. In general, it can be said that military equipment in many ways reflected the Scandinavian influence, and even in the XIV century the armament and armor of warriors of highland clans remained lighter than those of the “lowland” warriors, which, in turn, was old-fashioned compared to neighboring England .


The Holkham Bible 1320 miniature - 1330, presumably depicting the Battle of Bannockburn 1314 of the year. (British Library, London)

The main weapon of the Scottish spearmen was a spear 12 feet long, and an additional weapon was a short sword or dagger. Leather or quilted jackets, as well as chainmail gauntlets and corsets of iron plates linked with leather straps, served as armor for protection from arrows and swords. The head was covered with bascinet of conical shape or with wide brim. The exact ratio of spearmen and archers is unknown, but it seems that there were still more spearmen. The archer shot from a long bow (approx. 1, 80 cm) from a yew and had a quiver in which there were 24 arrows, one yard in length, with an iron petiole. In battle, the archers stepped forward, lined up, standing five or six steps away from each other, and fired on command, sending arrows at an angle to the horizon so that they fell at the target also at an angle or almost vertically. In the army of the English King Edward I, they were mainly archers from Ireland, northern England and from Wales. And from the same place archers and Scottish feudal lords recruited their troops.


Effiygiya Alan Swinton, died. 1200, Swinton, Berwickshire, Scotland.
(From the monograph by Brydall, Robert. 1895. The monumental effigies of Scotland. Glasgow: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland)

An important source of information on the history of military affairs in Scotland is effigy - tombstone sculptures. There are quite a few such epiches that today are very valuable historical sources, but they are usually damaged much more than their counterparts in England. In addition, it is also possible that some of them were made south of the Anglo-Scottish border and, as such, may not quite accurately reflect the military equipment of the Scottish warriors. On the other hand, their characteristic coarse carving and old-fashioned style may indicate that, although their creators were inspired by effects from England, they were local products. Thus, the heavily damaged image of Count Stratharna depicts a man in a hauberg with a mail kufuzh on his head and a large and old-fashioned shield, clearly hinting that he still did not wear plate armor or even a cuirass made of leather under a surko, being content with only a mail. The sword is relatively short and straight.


Many Scottish effigii suffered greatly from time ... One of the priory Inchmahon effigy.


But the effect of Walter Stewart, Count Menteith, Perthshire, of the end of the 13th century, from the Priory Inchmahon in Scotland, where he is depicted with his wife. He has the same hauberg with chainmail “mittens” woven to its sleeves, which hang freely from the brushes. That is, they had slits in their palms through which their hands could be easily released if necessary. He also has a large shield with a flat top, although he is very worn out, and on the hips is a traditional belt with a sword.


The effigy of Sir James Douglas, (Lanarkshire, c.1335, the Church of the Holy Bride, Douglas, Scotland), one of the greatest barons of Scotland, has survived to our time, but on it is depicted in a very simple, almost elementary military equipment consisting from chain haberkas and chain mail gloves. He has a padded gambeson, a hauberk visible under the hem, and he has a beautifully decorated belt with a sword. The shield, however, is still very large, given the manufacturing date of effigy, and probably reflects its lack of plate armor.

Later images of the 14th and 16th centuries, for example, the effect from Finlaggan belonging to Dognald McGillespaw shows that a particular style of weapons and armor has been preserved in this region; style that has some parallels in Ireland. The departed is dressed in quilted clothes with a chain mail mantle. This fashion is unknown among the knightly class of England. And this can be the result of both isolation and lack of resources, as well as traditional tactics of the Scottish infantry and light cavalry. The man clearly wears separate mittens. On his thigh is a long equestrian sword with a large curved cross, but the sheath is supported in the old fashioned way. The design of the handle is surprisingly similar to the earliest images of the famous Scottish Claymore sword, dating from the end of the 15th century.


Donald McGillespay Effigy, ca. 1540 from Finlaghan, Scotland. National Museum of Scotland). The most expressive part of it is the sword!


Claymore, approx. 1610 –1620 Length 136, see Blade Length 103,5, see Weight 2068,5 (Metropolitan Museum, New York)

Thus, if the Scottish aristocratic knightly weaponry almost completely corresponded to the “English fashion”, although with some elements of anachronism, the infantry from the peasants was armed for a long time in the traditions of past eras, and the tactics used even the times of the Picts - that is, dense formations, bristling with long spears, which made them inaccessible to the enemy cavalry, including even the knight.

Использованная литература:
1. Brydall, R. The Monumental Effigies of Scotland, from the 13th to the 15th Century. Harvard University, 1895
2. Norman, AVB, Pottinger, D. Warrior to soldier 449 to 1660. L .: Cox & Wyman, Ltd., 1964.
3. Armstrong, P. Bannockburn 1314: Robert Bruce's Great Victory. Osprey Campaign No. 102, 2002.
4. Reese, P., Bannockburn. Canongate, Edinburgh, 2003.
5. Nicolle, D. Arms and Armor of the Crusading Era, 1050 - 1350. UK L .: Greenhill Books. Vol.1.
6. Gravette, K. Knights: The History of English Knighthood 1200-1600 / Christopher Gravette (Translated from English by A. Colin). M .: Eksmo, 2010.


To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    20 February 2019 10: 11
    And where did the iron come from? Swamp?
    1. +1
      20 February 2019 10: 18
      There were also ore deposits. For example, in southern Germany
      1. 0
        20 February 2019 10: 21
        Honestly, is it not expensive from Bavaria, for example, to buy armor? or iron to them, pay what the Scottes could? Purely economic issue. I'm just following this cycle with interest. I am born the question that high-quality iron, I don’t speak about steel, was expensive, and the Scottes were not burdened with wealth, what to offer in payment, a share in production. harvest, the other does not occur.
      2. +3
        20 February 2019 15: 48
        Germany is far away.
        From the 5th century BC open-pit mining of iron ore began in Forest of Din (Glamorganshire).
        After the Norman conquest of Great Britain (1066), mining of iron ore began in Radlan (Flintshire).
        The problem of the British is the low iron content in the ore - 22-33%. Good ore was mined only in the county of Cumberland.
        1. +3
          20 February 2019 19: 12
          As I understand it, the Japanese cost less ...
          1. +3
            20 February 2019 20: 46
            They are generally minimalists in everything!
            1. 0
              20 February 2019 22: 25
              Ms. the fleet in WWII riveted a hefty !!!!
          2. +3
            20 February 2019 21: 46
            Looking at how much patience was enough to enrich the raw materials. Magnetite itself, which the Japanese used as sand, contains up to 72% of iron. The question is how much magnetite is in river sediments, where did they get it from.
        2. -1
          20 February 2019 22: 42
          Thanks for the info !!!
  2. +4
    20 February 2019 10: 27
    Recently, the Swiss were discussed here with their tight formation of spearmen, they recalled the Battle of Courthray as the forerunner of the infantry’s victories over the knightly cavalry and completely forgot about the Battle of Stirling Bridge, where the Scottish Shiltrons defeated the English knights in an offensive battle. In the first two photographs, the reenactors are trying to depict precisely the shiltron. At the Battle of Bannockburn, just like at the Stirling Bridge, it was precisely the active offensive coordinated actions of the Scottish shiltrons, invulnerable to the knightly cavalry, who decided the outcome of the matter. I wonder why the Scots, being pioneers in the successful use of dense infantry constructions armed with pole arms against knights, and ahead of the Swiss by almost a hundred years, were unable to develop a military corporation similar to the Swiss ... Although the Scottish soldiers were appreciated in the continental Europe, in particular, at the French court, but they were far from the commercial success of the Swiss.
    I believe the answer to this question is that at the beginning of the XIV century. no one could have hired the Scots in large quantities (keyword) for the war on the continent - there simply was no money, and the logistical problems with the delivery of large contingents to France, Burgundy or Germany mattered.
    In general, the Scots and Swiss are somewhat similar - equally poor highlanders. smile
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, thanks for the article. hi
    1. +5
      20 February 2019 10: 32
      Here I am about economics, and even the clanishness of the Scots. It is difficult to expose a large unit to one clan, but you can from two, but the question is who breaks everything to whom it is subordinate.
  3. +2
    20 February 2019 11: 17
    Robert Bruce Textured Man
    from a knightly point of view
    1. +2
      20 February 2019 12: 45
      so the nobility, from Izmala learned to wield knives and on horseback, besides meat ration. I have one of my grandmother’s brothers from the Ural Cossacks, numerous, 1899, I found him and talked. such a small one, 167 cm. well, it was wiry and strong, so he told me that the saber was given into his hands at 4 years old, on a horse even earlier, and a lot of time was devoted to owning knives, a lance, and a horse, from 8 years old a firearm. So the diet was, as he said, meat 3 times a day, and not chicken, porridge, and radish often well, a very strong man
  4. +1
    20 February 2019 14: 55
    Claymore, approx. 1610 –1620 Length 136 cm. Blade length 103,5 cm. Weight 2068,5
    ,,, not frail guys probably "worked" with such a sword.
    1. +1
      20 February 2019 20: 16
      Yes, it wasn’t frail just that there was another sharpening on physics, the firearm went, a lot has changed. I talked with the reenactors from Rostov, waved a little saber. For about a minute and a half. well it in FIG. .Is more sensible such an example, I was engaged in football, the usual. reached 2 adults, but somehow I had to play tennis, at the age of 17, then my arm hurt, although I could play a keeper and played with tennis players, played mini feet, they didn’t keep their legs after 20 minutes, again. the preparation is not the same.
    2. +3
      20 February 2019 20: 40
      By the way, they didn’t work with a sword for a long time, again infa from the reenactors, even their physics didn’t allow it, for a maximum of 5 minutes, you just allow yourself (kendo will allow you to understand, but without it) you can wave a stick weighing 1.5 kg for three minutes, the sensations will be !!! and now to that. it’s not a stick. but a sword and you have chain mail, a helmet, gloves, all weighing, for example, up to 15 kg, and at the same time you are also fighting, and seriously, it’s impressive.
      1. 0
        20 February 2019 20: 45
        Usually swords were lighter than 900 g - 1 kg.
        1. +1
          20 February 2019 22: 31
          two-handed people calmly reached 3 kg. Again, what era, and even 1 kg. in armor, when they still beat you, it's just hard, but imagine getting a blow flat on the helmet, it's not nice. besides, nobody canceled daggers in battle, and this is another type of strike. purely stinging. I’ll recover, not always stitching, it’s possible to cut
          1. 0
            21 February 2019 08: 16
            There is a miniature in the Bible of Macieus, where a dagger is pricked in the eye!
  5. +1
    20 February 2019 18: 22
    Donald McGillespay Effigy, ca. 1540 from Finlaghan, Scotland. National Museum of Scotland). The most expressive part of it is the sword!

    To paraphrase a classic - it is not clear whether the sword is fastened to the owner or the owner to the sword ...
  6. +1
    20 February 2019 19: 43
    Very interesting +
    And what's the net around the statue of King Malcolm?
    1. 0
      20 February 2019 20: 44
      Protective!
      Quote: Senior Sailor

      Very interesting +
      And what's the net around the statue of King Malcolm?
      1. 0
        21 February 2019 08: 51
        It's clear. But ... from the birds, from the vandals?
  7. 0
    20 February 2019 21: 51
    Again, all too feet, yards. Some foreign text is taken and almost literally translated. That's all, the article is ready. Even for such a simple operation as rummaging through a reference book, the authors have no desire.
    1. +1
      20 February 2019 22: 36
      But the author was looking, trying.
    2. +4
      20 February 2019 23: 03
      Quote: skeptic31
      Even for such a simple operation as rummaging through a reference book, the authors have no desire.

      And if you translate your feet into meters, say "there is 305 mm, and the author counted 300, he is too lazy to turn on the calculator." If you count 305, you say 304,8 is correct.
      Say thanks to the author and do not torment yourself with finding nitpicking.
    3. +1
      21 February 2019 08: 14
      You wrote everything correctly, Alexey. But ... you will not find these texts on your own, nor can you translate them. It turns out very funny through Google. And if it's not funny, I'm not sure that you know the language that much. And you also need to look for a photo. You can even imagine that writing such material is much easier than finding them. Sometimes it takes hours of hard work and correspondence. Therefore, there is simply not enough time for "simple operations" that everyone can do. It is very expensive for me. In addition, the plan contains 40 materials for this cycle. Which should illuminate the history of the weapons of this era among all peoples. This is a lot of work, but I don't have my own research institute.
      1. +2
        21 February 2019 08: 20
        translating specialized texts is difficult, especially about chivalry. I’m an example no, I don’t read the times, and so, despite the love of football, I simply don’t understand anything in their articles.
        1. +2
          21 February 2019 08: 24
          That is why before when applying for a job in the questionnaire in relation to a foreign language there was such a point: "I read and translate with a dictionary." Just your case.
          1. +2
            21 February 2019 12: 44
            As one movie hero said: - if you only know "Berlin" and "guten-tag" in German, you can safely write "I read with a dictionary"
  8. 0
    21 February 2019 10: 10
    Quote: Lamatinets
    two-handed people calmly reached 3 kg. Again, what era, and even 1 kg. in armor, when they still beat you, it's just hard, but imagine getting a blow flat on the helmet, it's not nice. besides, nobody canceled daggers in battle, and this is another type of strike. purely stinging. I’ll recover, not always stitching, it’s possible to cut

    As a re-enactor, I can say that even a knight trained from childhood could withstand no more than 5-10 minutes of the most active battle, only Karl the Great could withstand it more and even in legends). So there are even a lot of these 5-10 minutes, usually the fight takes about 2-3 minutes and there already either broke through the flank and go to the rear or lie on the ground. During the maneuvers, the hands rest.
  9. -1
    2 March 2019 23: 34
    I would like to know about the knights of Scotland themselves - local specifics, participation in the Crusades, how they lived in ordinary life, etc., etc ... hi

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"